ÿWPCü …# VU>a %Ÿ 0 ¥UB® 4ð  n­ À w@È 0M 0DU 0J™ 0Tã 0^7 0h• 0rý 0|o 0†ë 0q 1u 0dv BÚU6÷U.-U*[B)…DC® AMñ D3>{qtì 0@`f v~vÓ„ AOWƦ 0Dl D/° BߘHP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 <èÀ( 9Z &Courier RegularX(á—6$¡¡Ò°ÒÒX°ÒÑ  ÑÑ7€’XXdðXXdð7ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÓiU°X` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXiÓ<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiÔ¡¨ 3|xß«<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXxþ6X@ÉJQX@ ÍÎÏÐÑDÒÓÔÕÖÓ€(ý(3‹­$¤¤Ý ƒ—6!ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÑ  ÑÑ7€¾XXdÈdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÓiU°X` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXiÓÝ  Ýà ¸ àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ d< Œ 9p`(Courier New< Œ 9p`(Courier< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d''''7Border 1dd€-(Cþÿ << Gÿÿ'ÿÿdxd qÝ ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€$ÔÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÓ` °˜XÓÝ  ÝÔ€&ÔÔ€&ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€&XÔÌÌOctoberÏ17,Ï1996ÌÌCecilÏW.ÏCrowsonÌAppellateÏCourtÏClerkÔ  Ôó ó jÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€$ÔÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÓ` °˜XÓÝ  ÝÔ€&ÔÔ€&ôÔÑ7Àÿ¡XXdðXXdð7Ñà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóó€An€abuse€of€discretion€standard€of€review€applies€to€a€trial€courtððs€decision€to€revoke€a€communityÏcorrections€sentence.€€òòState€v.€›Harkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.€1991).€€However,€in€this€case,€the€defendant€doesÏnot€challenge€the€revocation€of€his€community€correction€sentences.Ì("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò \Ñ\R AØ'\ÑPtPtHPð€ÿÜÿìô”(üHPð€P € €'Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Geneva ÒÒ  BA Op Geneva Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€$ÔÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÑ  ÑÑ#€%%Xd#ÑÑ#€%%Xd#ÑÑ  ÑÓ` °˜XÓÝ  ÝÙ€€ÙÑ  ÑÑ Ü ÑÓÓÔ€&ÔÑ\R AØ'\Ñ›œßL€)+(;+'h|` ´- `€€Lß›à8 àà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINALÏAPPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àAT€NASHVILLEà@ à€€€€€€€€€Ìà àà à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€œJUNE€1994›€œSESSION›ÌÌÓÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà à)Ìà àAppellee,€à àà à)à àNo.€01C01„9404„CC„00120Ìà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà à)à àMaury€CountyÌv.à àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà à)à àHon.€œJim€›T.€Hamilton,ÏJudgeÌà àà àà àà à)ÌMICHAEL€ALDERSON,€€à àà à)à à(Sentencing)Ìà àà àà àà à)Ìà àAppellant.à àà à)ÌÌÌÌòòFor€the€Appellantóó:à àà àà àòòà àFor€the€Appelleeóó:ÌÌGregory€D.€Smith€€à àà àà àà àCharles€W.€BursonÌContract€Appellate€Defenderà àà àAttorney€General€ofÏTennesseeÌOne€Public€Squireà àà àà àà àà àandà àÌClarksville,€TN€37040€€€€€€€€€à àà àKimbra€Spann€€€€€Ì(AT€TRIAL€AND€ON€APPEAL)à àà àAssistant€Attorney€General€ofÏTennesseeÌà àà àà àà àà à450€JamesÏRobertson€ParkwayÌJohn€P.€Damronà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493ÌDistrict€Public€DefenderÌP.O.€Box€1208à àà àà àà àT.€Michael€Bottoms€€€€€€€€ÌPulaski,€TN€38478à àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€Generalà àÌ(At€TRIAL)à àà àà àà àà àP.O.€Box€459Ìà àà àà àà àà àLawrenceburg.€TN€38464„0459Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àandÌà àà àà àà àà àRobert€C.€SandersÌà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€Attorney€General€€€€€€€€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà àà à22€Public€SquareÌà àà àà àà àà àColumbia,€TN€38402„1619Ìà àà àà àà àà à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:_______________________ÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌ€€€€€€ÌJoseph€M.€TiptonÌJudgeÌÌÓÓà@ àòòò òO€P€I€N€I€O€Nóóó óÌÌà àThe€defendant,€Michael€Alderson,€appeals€as€of€right€from€the€sentencesÏimposed€by€the€Maury€County€Circuit€Court€after€it€revoked€his€placement€in€the€South€CentralÏTennessee€Community€Correction€Program.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant,€as€aÏRange€I,€standard€offender,€to€a€four„year€term€in€the€custody€of€the€Department€of€Correction€forÏaggravated€assault,€a€Class€C€felony,€a€consecutive€one„year€term€for€selling€a€counterfeitÏcontrolled€substance,€a€Class€E€felony,€and€a€concurrent€eleven„month„twenty„nine„day€term€forÍevading€arrest,€a€Class€A€misdemeanor.€€The€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€byÏenhancing€the€aggravated€assault€sentence€to€one€year€above€the€minimum€and€by€requiringÏthe€two€felony€sentences€to€be€served€consecutively.€€He€does€not€contest€the€revocation.ÌÌà àThe€record€on€appeal€reflects€that€pursuant€to€a€plea€agreement,€on€December€4,Ï1990,€the€defendant€entered€a€guilty€plea€to€aggravated€assault€and€a€judgment€of€convictionÏwas€entered.€€The€judgment€provides€that€a€sentence€of€three€years€was€imposed,€ð ðsuspendedÏupon€time€servedðð€œand€that›€three€years€probation€was€granted.ÌÌà àOn€February€4,€1991,€pursuant€to€a€plea€agreement,€the€defendant€entered€guiltyÏpleas€to€sale€of€a€counterfeit€controlled€substance€and€evading€arrest.€€The€judgments€ofÏconviction€provide€that€for€the€sale,€a€sentence€of€one€year€was€imposed€consecutive€to€theÏaggravated€assault€sentence,€and,€for€the€evading€arrest,€a€thirty„day€sentence€was€imposed,Ïconcurrent€to€the€one„year€sentence.€€These€sentences€were€to€be€served€on€probation.€€Thus,Ïat€this€point,€the€defendant€was€serving€an€effective€sentence€of€four€years€on€probation.ÌÌà àThe€record€indicates€that€a€probation€violation€warrant€was€issued€on€October€7,Ï1991,€and€amended€on€January€6,€1992.€€On€the€latter€date,€the€trial€court€entered€an€orderÏrevoking€the€felony€probations€for€the€defendantððs€failure€to€report€to€his€probation€officer€andÏfailure€to€meet€the€schedule€for€payment€of€his€fees€and€costs.€€The€order€recites€that€theÏdefendant€is€to€serve€the€felony€sentences€in€the€Department€of€Correction€but€also€states€thatÍhe€is€to€be€placed€in€the€community€corrections€program.€€A€transcript€of€the€revocation€hearingÏis€not€in€the€record.ÌÌà àAlthough€no€subsequent€revocation€warrant€is€in€the€record,€a€hearing€was€heldÏon€January€3,€1994,€at€which€the€defendantððs€community€corrections€supervisor€testified€that€heÏfiled€a€warrant€on€June€23,€1993,€because€the€defendant€had€failed€to€report€and€could€not€beÏfound€for€about€three€months.€€Apparently,€the€defendant€was€then€allowed€to€stay€on€theÏprogram€with€further€court€review€to€be€conducted€on€November€30,€1993.€€œHowever,›€theÏdefendant€ð ðabsconded€again,ðð€which€resulted€in€another€revocation€warrant€being€filed€onÏOctober€13,€1993.€€In€late€October,€after€the€defendant€turned€himself€in,€a€drug€screenÏperformed€on€the€defendant€showed€the€presence€of€cocaine.€€The€record€also€indicates€thatÏthis€was€the€second€positive€drug€screen€obtained€from€the€defendant,€the€first€having€resultedÏin€the€defendant€being€required€to€enter€a€drug€rehabilitation€program.ÌÌà àThe€defendant€did€not€testify€at€the€hearing,€although€he€elicited€testimony€fromÏhis€program€supervisor€that€he€had€performed€his€community€service€and€met€his€fees€and€costsÏpayment€requirements.€€His€counsel€requested€that€he€be€given€another€chance€and€offered€forÏhim€to€enter€another€rehabilitation€program.€€The€trial€court€refused€and€sentenced€theÏdefendant€to€an€effective€sentence€of€five€years,€a€one„year€sentence€for€his€sale€of€a€counterfeitÏcontrolled€substance€to€be€served€consecutively€to€a€four„year€sentence€for€aggravated€assaultÏand€concurrently€to€an€eleven„month„twenty„nine„day€sentence€for€evading€arrest.€€ÌÌà@ àò òIó óÌà àThe€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€improperly€enhanced€his€sentence€forÏaggravated€assault.€€He€asserts€that€a€notice€of€enhancement€factors€was€never€filed,€òòseeóó€T.C.A.Ïðð€40„35„202(b)(1),€and€that€the€trial€court€failed€to€make€factual€findings€on€the€recordÏsupporting€enhancement€of€the€sentence.€€òòSeeóó€T.C.A.€ðð€40„35„210(f).€€The€state€counters€thatÏthe€requirements€of€the€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989€do€not€apply€to€resentencing€decisionsÏmade€after€revocation€of€a€community€corrections€sentence€œand,›€œthus,›€the€trial€courtððs€impositionÏof€a€four„year€sentence€for€aggravated€assault€was€proper€even€though€it€did€not€make€factualÏfindings€in€support€of€its€decision.ÌÌà àWe€disagree€with€the€stateððs€assertion€that€the€1989€act€is€inapplicable€toÏsentencing€decisions€made€after€revocation€of€a€defendantððs€community€corrections€sentence.€ÏBy€its€terms,€the€act€applies€to€the€sentencing€of€all€persons€who€commit€crimes€on€or€afterÏNovember€1,€1989:ÌÓ  ÓÓÓà8 àò òà àApplicability€of€chapter.€ó ó„„€(a)€All€persons€who€commitÏcrimes€on€or€after€November€1,€1989,€shall€be€tried€and€sentencedÏunder€the€provisions€of€this€chapter.Ó  ÓÌÓÓT.C.A.€ðð€40„35„117.€€A€sentence€imposed€under€the€Tennessee€Community€Corrections€Act€ofÏ1985€must€also€comply€with€the€sentencing€considerations€and€purposes€of€the€1989€act.€€òòStateÏv.€Smithóó,€898€S.W.2d€742,€746€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994);€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó,€òòState€v.€Pattyóó,€922€S.W.2dÍ102,€103€(Tenn.€1995)€(applying€principles€of€the€1989€act€to€resentencing€after€revocation€ofÏcommunity€corrections€sentence).ÌÌà àUnder€the€1989€act,€appellate€review€of€sentencing€is€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€on€the€record€withÏa€presumption€that€the€trial€court's€determinations€are€correct.€€T.C.A.€ðððð€40„35„401(d)€and€„402(d).× ƒ, ××  ×€€As€the€Sentencing€Commission€Comments€to€these€sections€note,€the€burden€is€nowÏon€the€appealing€party€to€show€that€the€sentencing€is€improper.€€This€means€that€if€the€trial€courtÏfollowed€the€statutory€sentencing€procedure,€made€findings€of€fact€that€are€adequatelyÏsupported€in€the€record,€and€gave€due€consideration€and€proper€weight€to€the€factors€andÏprinciples€that€are€relevant€to€sentencing€under€the€1989€sentencing€act,€we€may€not€disturb€theÏsentence€even€if€a€different€result€were€preferred.€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.€1991).€ÌÌà àHowever,€"the€presumption€of€correctness€which€accompanies€the€trial€court'sÏaction€is€conditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€consideredÏthe€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances."€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2dÏ166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€In€this€respect,€for€the€purpose€of€meaningful€appellate€review,ÌÓ  ÓÓÓà8 àthe€trial€court€must€place€on€the€record€its€reasons€for€arriving€atÏthe€final€sentencing€decision,€identify€the€mitigating€andÏenhancement€factors€found,€state€the€specific€facts€supportingÍeach€enhancement€factor€found,€and€articulate€how€the€mitigatingÏand€enhancement€factors€have€been€evaluated€and€balanced€inÏdetermining€the€sentence.€T.C.A.€ðððð€40„35„210(f)€(1990).€€ÌÓÓÌÓ  ÓòòState€v.€Jonesóó,€883€S.W.2d€597,€599€(Tenn.€1994).ÌÌà àAlthough€the€record€in€this€case€does€not€reflect€that€the€trial€court€properlyÏconsidered€all€of€the€relevant€sentencing€principles,€enhancement€of€the€defendantððs€convictionÏfor€aggravated€assault€remains€justified.€€The€defendantððs€use€of€cocaine€œshows›€criminalÏbehavior,€òòseeóó€T.C.A.€ðð€40„35„114(1),€and€he€has€also€demonstrated€his€inability€to€abide€byÏconditions€of€a€sentence€involving€release€into€the€community.€€òòSeeóó€T.C.A.€ðð€40„35„114€(8).€€ÌÌà àInitially,€the€defendant€was€to€serve€his€sentence€for€aggravated€assault€€onÏprobation.€€However,€he€violated€the€conditions€of€his€probation€by€failing€to€report€œand€by›€failingÏto€meet€the€scheduled€fee€payments.€€He€was€then€granted€a€community€corrections€sentence.€ÏIn€the€two€years€that€the€defendant€was€serving€his€community€corrections€sentence,€twoÏrevocation€warrants€were€filed.€€The€first€resulted€from€his€failure€to€report€to€his€communityÏcorrections€officer€for€a€period€of€three€months.€€He€was€allowed€to€stay€on€the€program€but€wasÏrequired€to€enter€a€drug€rehabilitation€program€because€he€tested€positive€for€cocaine.€€It€wasÏnot€until€the€defendant€violated€the€courtððs€trust€again€by€failing€to€report€œand€by›€testing€positiveÏfor€cocaine€that€the€trial€court€revoked€the€defendantððs€community€corrections€sentence.€€TheÍdefendantððs€unwillingness€to€comply€with€conditions€of€release€warrants€enhancement€of€hisÏaggravated€assault€conviction€by€a€year.€ÌÌà@ àò òIIÌó óà àNext,€the€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€ordering€that€hisÏsentence€for€sale€of€a€counterfeit€controlled€substance€be€served€consecutively€to€his€sentenceÏfor€aggravated€assault.€€However,€when€the€defendant€entered€his€guilty€plea€for€sale€of€aÏcounterfeit€controlled€substance,€œhe€agreed€that›€consecutive€sentencing€was€proper.€€TheÏconsecutive€nature€of€the€defendantððs€sentence€is€no€less€appropriate€after€his€misconduct€whileÏon€probation€and€in€the€community€corrections€program.ÌÑ€.ÑÇà àIn€consideration€of€the€foregoing€and€the€record€as€a€whole,€the€defendantððsÏsentences€for€aggravated€assault€and€sale€of€a€counterfeit€controlled€substance€are€œaffirmed.ÌÓÓÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ìóóà àà àà àà àà àà àà àJoseph€M.€Tipton,€Judge€›ÌœÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ___________________________ÌDavid€H.€Welles,€JudgeÌÌÌÌ___________________________òòÌóóStephen€M.€Bevil,€Special€JudgeòòÌÌÌÌóó›