ÿWPCo  …# VU>a %Ÿ 0í¥UB’ 4Ô è n­÷ ¤ w@¬ 01ì 0D 0Ja 0T« 0^ÿ 0h] 0rÅ 0|7 0†³ 09 1uÉU,> 0dj BÎU,ëU6U.M D3{U*®B)Ø 0@DCA AM„Ñ)Pv~yvÓ÷ AOÊÆ 0Dß D/# BR ˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 <èÀ( 9Z &Courier RegularX(ÅÕÐ$¡¡Ñ  ÑÑ7€'CXXdÈXXdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÓiU°X` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXiÓ<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpi»{s 3|x «<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXxþ6X@ÉJQX@ í Dî Dï ó ô õ Dö E÷ ø Ó€ (á(3,$¤¤Ý ƒÕÐ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ7€^{XXdÈdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÓiU°X` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXiÓÝ  Ýà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ d< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(Courier New< Œ 9p`(Courier""""'ÿÿdxd< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò,,,,7Border 1dd€-.Cþÿ << Gÿÿ uÝ ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÓ` °˜XÓÝ  ÝÔ€+ÔÔ€+ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€+XÔÌÌò òJuly€26,€1996ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€+ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÓ` °˜XÓÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€+ÔÔ€+ôÔWe€note€that€at€the€April€1995€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€denied€the€defendant€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ïbond€pending€appeal.€€This€case€was€assigned€for€review€on€the€briefs€in€April€1996.€€The€record€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ïreflects€neither€a€review€of€the€bond€denial€nor€a€motion€for€expedited€appellate€review.€€Given€the€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ïfact€that€the€defendant€was€eligible€for€release€well€in€advance€of€the€case€being€assigned€in€this€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ïcourt,€the€issues€in€this€case€may€very€well€be€moot.€€ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHØ(d'`Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Monaco ÒÒ  BA Op Monaco Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÓ&€''X„d&ÓÑ#€''Xd#ÑÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÑ#€))Xd#ÑÑ#€))Xd#ÑÑ  ÑÓ` °˜XÓÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÙ€€ÙÑ  ÑÑ Ü ÑÓÓÑ\R AØ'\ÑÔ€+Ô›œßL€/0.;+'h|ñ` Å `€€Lß›€à8 àà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINALÏAPPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àAT€JACKSONà@ à€€€€€€€€€Ìà àà à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€APRIL€1996€SESSIONÌÌÓÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà à)à àÌ€à àà àà àà à)Ìà àAppellee,€à àà à)à àNo.€02C01„9508„CC„00230Ìà à€€€€€à àà à€€à à)Ìà àà àà àà à)à àHenry€CountyÌv.à àà àà àà à)€€€€€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà à)à à€Hon.€Julian€P.€Guinn,€Judge€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà à)ÌMARCUS€CORTEZ€ALDRIDGE,€à à)à à€(Aggravated€Assault)Ìà àà àà àà à)€€€€€€€€Ìà àAppellant.à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àÌÌòòFor€the€Appellantóó:à àà àà àà àòòFor€the€Appelleeóó:ÌÌW.€Jeffery€Faganà àà àà àà àCharles€W.€BursonÌAssistant€Public€Defenderà àà àà àAttorney€General€of€TennesseeÌ117€Forrest€Avenue€Northà àà àà àà àandÌP.O.€Box€663à àà àà àà àClinton€J.€MorganÌCamden,€TN€38320à àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€General€of€TennesseeÏà àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€Parkwayà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àG.€Robert€RadfordÌà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àP.O.€Box€686Ìà àà àà àà àà àHuntingdon,€TN€38344ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:____________________ÌÌœÌAFFIRMED›ÌÌJoseph€M.€TiptonÌJudgeÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÇà@ àòòò òO€P€I€N€I€O€Nóóó óÌÌÌÓÓà àThe€defendant,€Marcus€Cortez€Aldridge,€was€convicted€of€aggravatedÏassault,€a€Class€C€felony,€pursuant€to€a€guilty€plea€in€the€Henry€County€Circuit€Court.€ÏHe€was€sentenced€to€thirty„seven€months€as€a€Range€I,€standard€offender.€€In€thisÏappeal€as€of€right,€he€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€his€request€for€aÏCommunity€Corrections€sentence€or,€in€the€alternative,€for€full€probation.ÌÌà àThe€record€reflects€that€on€September€4,€1994,€the€defendant€assaultedÏthe€victim,€Tarrel€Parker,€with€a€teeball€bat€during€an€argument€in€the€rear€parking€lot€ofÏa€McDonaldððs€restaurant.€€The€victim€suffered€a€three„inch€cut€to€his€head€that€requiredÏmedical€attention€at€the€local€emergency€room.€€The€defendant,€seventeen€years€old€atÏthe€time€of€the€offense,€was€transferred€to€adult€court€where€he€entered€a€guilty€plea€toÏaggravated€assault.€€In€his€statement€to€the€probation€officer,€the€defendant€claimedÏthat€during€the€altercation€and€after€his€companion€pulled€out€a€pistol,€the€victimÏreached€for€his€back€pocket€and€the€defendant€thought€that€the€victim€might€have€hadÏa€gun.€ÌÌà àAt€the€April€1995€sentencing€hearing,€the€defendant€sought€alternativeÏsentencing€and€argued€that€he€should€be€sentenced€to€the€community€correctionsÏprogram.€€He€testified€that€he€is€the€father€of€a€young€child€who€resides€in€his€care.€€HeÍalso€stated€that€he€has€been€employed€with€Taco€Bell€since€August€of€1994€and€isÏworking€about€thirty„five€hours€a€week€while€attending€high€school.€€He€explained€thatÏhe€missed€several€days€of€school€due€to€his€child€being€sick€and€that€he€did€not€haveÏenough€credits€to€graduate.€€Instead,€he€stated€his€intention€to€take€classes€towardÏobtaining€his€graduate€equivalency€degree€in€the€summer.€€The€defendant€admitted€toÏtwo€juvenile€offenses€„„€one€for€aggravated€burglary€and€another€for€underageÏconsumption€of€alcohol.€€He€also€admitted€that€he€had€been€suspended€from€riding€theÏschool€bus€for€spitting€on€another€student€and€had€been€suspended€for€fighting€onceÏduring€his€senior€year€of€high€school.€€He€expressed€remorse€for€his€actions€andÏacknowledged€that€he€should€not€have€struck€the€victim.ÌÌ€€€€€€à àThe€trial€court€denied€community€corrections€and€probation.€€It€stated€thatÏthere€were€needs€to€deter€others€from€resorting€to€using€deadly€weapons€to€settleÏarguments€and€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense.€€The€trial€courtÏalso€considered€the€potential€for€a€split€confinement€sentence,€but€concluded€thatÏthere€were€not€expert€or€other€resources€available€locally€for€dealing€with€such€aÏyouthful€prisoner,€and€it€determined€that€the€Department€of€Correction€would€haveÏbetter€tools€to€deal€with€the€defendant€in€terms€of€meeting€his€rehabilitative€needs.€€ÌÌà àAppellate€review€of€sentencing€is€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€on€the€record€with€aÏpresumption€that€the€trial€courtððs€determinations€are€correct.€€T.C.A.€ðððð€40„35„401(d)Íand€„402(d).€€As€the€Sentencing€Commission€Comments€to€these€sections€note,€theÏburden€is€now€on€the€appealing€party€to€show€that€the€sentencing€is€improper.€€ThisÏmeans€that€if€the€trial€court€follows€the€statutory€sentencing€procedure,€makes€findingsÏof€fact€that€are€adequately€supported€in€the€record,€and€gives€due€consideration€andÏproper€application€of€the€factors€and€principles€that€are€relevant€to€sentencing€underÏthe€1989€Sentencing€Act,€we€may€not€disturb€the€sentence€even€if€a€different€resultÏwere€preferred.€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).ÌÌà àFirst,€we€note€that€the€defendant€was€not€eligible€for€sentencing€under€theÏCommunity€Corrections€Act€because€only€persons€convicted€of€ð ðproperty„related,€orÏdrug/alcohol„related€felony€offenses€or€òòother€felonies€not€involving€crimes€against€theÏpersonóó€as€provided€in€.€.€.€€title€39,€chapter€13,€parts€1„5"€are€eligible€for€communityÏcorrections.€€T.C.A.€ðð€40„36„106(a)(2)€(emphasis€added).€€Aggravated€assault€isÏproscribed€by€T.C.A.€ðð€39„13„102,€which€obviously€is€a€crime€against€the€person€asÏprovided€in€Title€39,€chapter€13,€part€1.€€Also,€there€is€no€indication€in€the€record€thatÏthe€defendant€possesses€any€special€need€requiring€treatment€that€necessitates€thatÏhis€sentence€will€be€best€served€in€the€community.€€T.C.A.€ðð€40„36„106(c).ÌÌà àAlthough€probation€must€be€automatically€considered,€the€defendant€isÏnot€entitled€to€probation€as€a€matter€of€law.€€òòSeeóó€T.C.A.€ðð€40„35„303(b);€SentencingÏCommission€Comments€to€T.C.A.€ðð€40„35„303;€òòFletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€at€787.€€However,Ías€a€Range€I€standard€offender€who€has€been€convicted€of€a€Class€C€felony,€he€isÏpresumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€a€sentence€other€than€confinement,€if€thereÏis€no€evidence€to€the€contrary.€€òòSeeóó€T.C.A.€ðð€40„35„102(5)€and€(6).€€The€presumption€inÏfavor€of€alternative€sentencing€may€be€rebutted€if€(1)€ð ðconfinement€is€necessary€toÏprotect€society€by€restraining€the€defendant€who€has€a€long€history€of€criminalÏconduct,ðð€(2)€ð ðconfinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€theÏoffense€or€confinement€is€particularly€suited€to€provide€an€effective€deterrence€toÏothers€likely€to€commit€similar€offenses,ðð€or€(3)€ð ðmeasures€less€restrictive€thanÏconfinement€have€frequently€or€recently€been€applied€unsuccessfully€to€theÏdefendant.ðð€€T.C.A.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(A)„(C);€òòseeóó€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169.ÌÌà àThis€case€is€somewhat€of€an€anomaly.€€There€is€evidence€in€the€recordÏthat€would€favor€the€defendant€receiving€œa›€sentencing€alternative€that€would€œinclude›Ïsome€confinement.€€His€history€of€delinquency€and€disciplinary€problems,€coupled€withÏthe€circumstances€surrounding€the€present€offense,€justify€him€not€receiving€fullÏprobation.€€In€this€respect,€we€interpret€the€trial€courtððs€comments€to€mean€that€it€wouldÏhave€ordered€a€period€of€confinement€followed€by€some€form€of€community€release€if€itÏhad€believed€that€proper€resources€were€available€locally€to€deal€with€the€defendantððsÏparticular€housing€and€rehabilitation€needs.€€Thus,€it€is€apparent€that€the€trial€courtÏbelieved€the€interests€of€the€defendant€to€be€better€served€by€his€being€housed€in€aÏDepartment€of€Correction€facility.€€The€defendant€presents€nothing€to€refute€the€trialÍcourtððs€conclusion€that€local€resources€were€insufficient€in€this€case.€€Rather,€he€onlyÏargues€that€the€evidence€shows€that€he€is€entitled€to€supervised€probation.œ× ƒ1 ××  ×›ÌÌà àUnder€these€circumstances,€the€presumption€that€the€trial€courtððsÏdeterminations€are€correct€has€not€been€overcome.€€The€judgment€of€conviction€isÏaffirmed.ÌÓÓà àÌà àà àà àà àòòà à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌà àà àà àà àà àJoseph€M.€Tipton,€Judge€ÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Judge€ÌÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌJerry€L.€Smith,€Judge€€€