ÿWPC~ QIѸt=¿ä„7²¸Uy-•é ™¡ÊZE–Úèj– ZTA=ŒdGKÔNKR€œPx2Ëäp𥿼ç;êŠi+ëºÍò·@iyoElŒ'•0ÛQ©íÊÕèÌZ1Ê9ý#«!% Ðto€ensure€he€would€spend€no€further€time€in€confinement€on€the€current€charges.€€However,€he€claimsÐ Ô&$"& Ðthat€TDOC€bases€his€parole€eligibility€on€the€longest€sentence€he€has€in€its€system,€which€is€eighteenÐ º' #' Ðyears€and€not€twelve€years.€€Furthermore,€petitioner€claims€federal€authorities€will€not€give€himÐ  (ð#( Ðcredit€for€time€served€until€he€is€released€from€state€custody€and€moved€to€a€federal€prison.€Ð †)Ö$) ÐTherefore,€petitioner€claims€he€now€faces€a€potential€of€six€additional€years€of€incarceration€aboveÐ l*¼%* Ðthat€intended.€€Thus,€he€contends€trial€counsel€should€have€confirmed€with€€TDOC€that€his€sentenceÐ R+¢&+ Ðwould€operate€as€the€parties€intended,€and€further€claims€he€would€not€have€pled€guilty€had€he€beenÐ 8,ˆ', Ðinformed€he€could€face€additional€incarceration.€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ð ° ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€found€the€defendantððs€trial€counsel€rendered€effective€representation.€€The€trialÐ |Ì Ðcourt€noted€it€was€without€jurisdiction€to€address€potential€problems€relating€to€serving€the€federalÐ b² Ðsentence.€€Furthermore,€it€held€the€defendant€failed€to€show€his€state€parole€possibilities€would€Ð H˜ Ðactually€be€based€upon€eighteen€years.€€The€trial€court€also€noted€the€petitioner€had€not€establishedÐ . ~ Ðthat€he€cannot€receive€federal€credit€until€he€is€in€federal€custody.€€In€summary,€the€trial€court€notedÐ  d Ðthat€the€petitionerððs€arguments€were€merely€speculative.€€We€agree€with€the€trial€courtððs€findings.€Ð ú J ÐÌà  àThis€court€has€held€that€erroneous€parole€eligibility€advice€by€counsel€may€give€rise€to€aÐ Æ   Ðclaim€of€€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel.€€òòóóòòWalton€v.€Stateóó,€966€S.W.2d€54,€55€(Tenn€Crim.€App.Ð ¬ ü  Ð1997).€€However,€unlike€òòWaltonóó,€in€the€instant€case,€petitioner€conceded€trial€counsel€did€not€adviseÐ ’â  Ðhim€he€would€be€paroled€within€any€specified€period€of€time.€òòóóÐ xÈ  ÐÌà  àWe€conclude€that€petitioner€received€the€exact€sentences€agreed€upon,€namely,€twelve€yearsÐ D”  Ð(prior€state€sentences)€plus€a€consecutive€105€months€(prior€federal€sentence)€with€the€instantÐ *z  Ðeighteen„year€sentence€to€run€concurrently€with€both€prior€sentences.€€If€petitioner€feels€aggrievedÐ ` Ðby€the€TDOC€method€of€calculation€of€parole€eligibility,€the€proper€remedy€is€through€theÐ öF ÐAdministrative€Procedures€Act.€€òòSeeóó€òòBrigham€v.€Lackóó,€755€S.W.2d€469,€471€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð Ü, Ð1988);€òòTray€D.€Turner€v.€Stateóó,€No.€03C01„9902„CR„00088,€1999€WL€1081331,€at€*1€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð Â ÐApp.,€Knoxville,€Dec.€1,€1999).€€As€noted€by€the€trial€court,€we€will€not€speculate€as€to€when€federalÐ ¨ø Ðauthorities€will€take€custody€of€petitioner,€nor€will€we€speculate€as€to€how€federal€authorities€willÐ ŽÞ Ðat€some€point€in€the€future€calculate€credits€toward€its€sentence.€€If€petitioner€feels€aggrieved€by€theÐ tÄ Ðaction€taken€or€not€taken€by€federal€authorities,€we€assume€he€can€seek€relief€in€the€appropriateÐ Zª Ðfederal€forum.€€For€these€reasons,€we€conclude€that€petitioner€has€not€established€ineffectiveÐ @ Ðassistance€of€counsel,€nor€has€he€established€that€his€plea€was€unknowing.€€Ð &v ÐÌà  àWe€also€observe€that€petitioner€was€indicted€on€nineteen€counts€of€aggravated€burglary€(ClassÐ òB ÐC€felonies),€one€count€of€theft€over€$10,000€(Class€C€felony),€five€counts€of€theft€over€$1,000€(ClassÐ Ø( ÐD€felonies),€and€one€count€of€burglary€(Class€D€felony).€€The€transcript€of€the€guilty€plea€reveals€thatÐ ¾ Ðthe€petitioner€had€ð ðconfessed€to€all€these€burglariesðð€and€was€at€least€a€Range€II€offender€facing€sixÐ ¤ô Ðto€ten€years€for€òòeachóó€aggravated€burglary,€six€to€ten€years€for€theft€over€$10,000,€four€to€eight€yearsÐ Š Ú Ðfor€burglary,€and€four€to€eight€years€for€òòeachóó€theft€over€$1,000.€€Furthermore,€he€faced€the€very€realÐ p!À  Ðpossibility€of€consecutive€sentencing€based€upon€his€extensive€prior€criminal€history.€€òòSeeòòóó€óóTenn.Ð V"¦! ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(b)(2).€€Furthermore,€the€petitioner€had€just€been€sentenced€to€twelve€yearsÐ <#Œ" Ðplus€105€months€in€other€courts.€€Under€these€circumstances,€counselððs€ability€to€negotiate€RangeÐ "$r# ÐI€sentences€of€eighteen„years€concurrent€with€the€prior€sentences€does€not€constitute€ineffectiveÐ %X $ Ðassistance€of€counsel.Ð î%>!% Ðà  àÌÌÓ  Óò òCONCLUSIONòòÐ  (ð#( ÐÌóóó óÓ  Óà  àBased€upon€our€review€of€the€record,€we€conclude€that€the€defendantððs€trial€counsel€renderedÐ l*¼%* Ðeffective€assistance€during€the€plea€negotiations€and€guilty€plea€proceeding.€€We€further€concludeÐ R+¢&+ Ðthat€petitionerððs€guilty€plea€was€knowingly€and€voluntarily€entered.€€Thus,€the€judgment€of€the€trialÐ 8,ˆ', Ðcourt€is€affirmed.Ð ° ÐÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à_____________________________________Ð . ~ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGE