WPC 6G۱%.IuJy?οEwj"5x r/xh#x%Ӡٰ.zӏB^ G<K!O gc‚<8#XDL{+ZiˀZvq7Rg&:*NcRӘyJf?g.=Vӆִ.,/%!T>ZpY=n}r.Nܴg;7չ͔dI_GK>3O K[l0Rn!Z1Sjlg<鸎< i1U[ *\ehGݰ%H@Ñּ¼.^Vغ #dXV?6uvR*LA@wbظub]h1su“r+Qtz4jC$9diYQFDz|^9[+g RFIyNFCqLr53!ΤEN5` %@U.FtnX 0P4, @ 0H 0D w U:$ ^ Qf # Nx ^ z  m B AS  0V 0V+ 0D D5 X%2A`ArialTT3|X<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXx6X@JQX@%2A`ArialTTt10cpiXXX2PQXP(($D  Ӭsp'(D(3$ !D      0  (#$  0  ,cAZ"Arial Regular  G ["USUS.,  _ X X   Ad FILED XH X   December20,1999  Cecil_Crowson_,Jr. dd AppellateCourtClerkdAk HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 604(L U dZ[\]_E<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(.3$ !USUS.,  (.3$ !USUS.,  ($$   1  $$$$)!dxdx !D   _` X  TR[A'LegalX3' Letter A' Legal3'TXH XX X8 H  XXdd8xY_B2.jzL`  `@E6 ` ttx0Vn x  INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE `  @;;ATJACKSON ,  @qq6;OCTOBER1999SESSION    STATEOFTENNESSEE,     T )  v     L      T ) C.C.A.NO.W199901906CCAR3CD  \    Appellee,  򀀀   T ) B     L      T )  MADISONCOUNTY  (  VS.   L      T )      L      T )  HON.FRANKLIN_MURCHISON_,   LEEBELL,JR.,0 L      T )  JUDGEz L2%L2%    L      T ) `  0 0 2% 2%0L 2% 2% Appellant.   0L2%L2%0T2%2%)  (RevocationofCommunityFT2%T2%    L      T   Corrections)  ,  FORTHEAPPELLANT:     T   FORTHEAPPELLEE: $  GEORGE_GOOGE_ L      T   PAULG.SUMMERS v  DistrictPublicDefender     T   AttorneyGeneral&Reporter   \ VANESSAD.KING     T   PATRICIAC._KUSSMANN_ "(  Asst.PublicDefender     T   Asst.AttorneyGeneral  n#  227WestBaltimoreSt.     T   _Cordell_ԀHullBldg.,2ndFl. T$ Jackson,TN38301 L      T   425FifthAve.,North :%    L      T   Nashville,TN372430493  &   C.MICHAELROBBINS      T      \    !  '! 46NorthThirdSt. L      T   JERRY_WOODALL_  '" Suite719  L      T   DistrictAttorneyGeneral (r# Memphis,TN38103     T    )X $  (OnAppeal) L      T 0  DONALDH.ALLEN *>!%2%2%    L      T   Asst.DistrictAttorneyGeneral +$"&    L      T   LowellThomasStateOfficeBldg. j, #'    L      T   Jackson,TN38301 P-#(    L      T      L   OPINIONFILED:򀀀 0',  AFFIRMED  4 +0  JOHNH._PEAY_,  27-3 Judge 8.4   8/5 _X  @:; XXH OPINION#XH X;#Ԉ `        L Thedefendantpledguiltytothreecountsoftheftofpropertyunder   fivehundreddollars($500),twocountsofforgery,twocountsofcriminalimpersonation,  onecountofaggravatedcriminaltrespass,andwasfoundguiltybyajuryofonecount V oftheftofpropertyoveronethousanddollars($1000).Thedefendantreceivedan "  effectivesentenceofeightyearswithelevenmonths,twentyninedaystobeservedin N  confinementandsevenyearsandonedaytobeservedinacommunitycorrections   program.Apetitionwassubsequentlyfiledrequestingthatthetrialcourtrevokethe  defendantsalternativesentence.Afteranevidentiaryhearing,thetrialcourtremoved R thedefendantfromthecommunitycorrectionsprogramandorderedthatthedefendant ~ servetheremainderofhissentenceinconfinement.Thedefendantnowappealsthetrial J courtsrevocationofhissentenceinthecommunitycorrectionsprogram.Afterareview  oftherecordandapplicablelaw,wefindnomerittothedefendantscontentionsandthus   affirmthejudgmentofthecourtbelow. "N   Thedefendantfirstcontendsthatthetrialcourtsorderrevokinghis F&  communitycorrectionssentenceisvoid asitisgroundedonanillegalandvoidarrest (" warrant.Specifically,thedefendantcontendsthattheinformationprovidedbytheaffiant )~ $ whichwasusedtojustifythedefendantsarrestwasunsworn.Assuch,thedefendant +J"& argues,thewarrantisvoidabinitioandanyproceedingsbasedonthewarrantarevoid v-$( aswell.Thisissuewasnotlitigatedatthetriallevel.Inaddition,thearrestwarrantwas B/%* signedbythedefendantscommunitycorrectionsofficerunderthesectiontitled Affidavit 1', andthetrialjudgeissuedthewarrantthereon.Anyissueregardingadefectinthearrest 2z). warranthasbeenwaivedandcannotbeconsideredonappeal.SeeStatev.Lunati,665 4F+0 S.W.2d739,749(Tenn.Crim.App.1983). r6-2 Ї  Thedefendantnextcontendsthatthetrialcourtabuseditsdiscretionin `  revokinghiscommunitycorrectionssentenceandorderingthatheservetheremainder ,  inconfinement.Thetrialcourthasthediscretiontorevokeacommunitycorrections   sentenceuponafindingthatthedefendanthasviolatedtheconditionsofhisbehavioral d contract.SeeStatev.Harkins,811S.W.2d79,82(Tenn.1991).However,beforea 0 sentencemayberevoked,therecordmustcontainsufficientevidencetopermitthetrial \  courttomakeanintelligentandconscientiousdecision.Id.ThisCourtwillnotdisturb (  thetrialcourtsdecisionabsentafindingthatthetrialcourtabuseditsdiscretion.Id.In   ordertofindthatthetrialcourtabuseditsdiscretion,thisCourtmustfindthattherecord ` containsnosubstantialevidencetosupportthetrialcourtsconclusionthatthedefendant , violatedthetermsofthecommunitycorrectionsprogram.Id. X   Attherevocationhearing,thedefendantscommunitycorrectionsofficer,  ClarenceFitzhugh,testifiedthatalthoughthedefendantdidsignupfortheprogramand  \ signedthebehavioralcontract,thedefendantfailedtoreporttoanyoneintheprogram "( asisrequired.Inaddition,thedefendantfailedtopaysupervisionfees,courtcostsor T$ fines.Inhisdefense,thedefendanttestifiedthathetriedtoreporttotheprobationoffice  &  butwastoldhewasreportingtothewrongoffice.Whenhetriedtoreporttotheoffice '" towhichhewasdirected,hewasagaininstructedtoreportsomewhereelse.The )X $ defendantfurthertestifiedthathedidnotpayhissupervisionfeesandcourtcosts +$"& becausehewaspayingchildsupportinstead.Inlightoftheforegoing,therecordamply P-#( supportsthetrialcourtsfindingsthattheviolationsoccurred. /%*  Nevertheless,thedefendantcontendsthathefailedtofollowtheguidelinesofthe 2T). communitycorrectionsprogramduetoamentaldeficiencywhichwasnotedbythetrial 4 +0 judge.Attherevocationhearing,thetrialjudgestatedthat, L6,2  DAlthoughIwouldagree,[thedefendant]seemstohaveahard `  timeunderstandingthings...[thedefendant]seemstohavea F  difficulttimegettingthingsdoneandgettingthingsdoneright.He ,  reallydoes,butIthinkwevegoneaboutasfaraswecanwith   him.Hesnotevergoingtobeabletosuccessfullybeon   CommunityCorrectionsorprobation.Imgoingtosendhimto  ~ TDOCtoservehissentence....Hesviolated...his d CommunityCorrectionsprogram,inasubstantialway. J  L   &D Wefirstnotethat,otherthanthetrialcourtsstatements,thereisabsolutelynoproofin v  therecordsupportingthedefendantsallegationthatheismentallydeficienttosuchan B  extentthathewasunabletocomplywiththetermsofhiscommunitycorrections   sentence.Inanyevent,inthecontextofaprobationviolation,themajorityviewisthat z  amentaldefectmayonlybeconsideredasmitigatingevidence.Statev.JeffreyD. F Hunter,No.01C019608CC00334,WilliamsonCounty(Tenn.Crim.App.filedOctober r 30,1997,atNashville).Assuch,thetrialcourtmetitsobligationbyspecifically > consideringthedefendantsmentalconditioninmitigationofhisfailuretofollowthe   communitycorrectionsguidelines.However,thetrialcourtstillconcludedthatthe v defendantscommunitycorrectionssentenceshouldberevoked.Therecordfully !B supportsthisdecision. n#   Thedefendantfurthercontendsthatthetrialcourterredinrevokinghis '! communitycorrectionssentenceonthebasisofhisfailuretopaycourtcostsandfees. (r# Thedefendantarguesthathischildsupportobligationsandotherexpensesprevented *>!% himfrommakingtherequiredpayments.Thedefendantarguesthat,asaprobationary j, #' sentencemaynotberevokedonthenakedproofoffailuretopayrequiredfeesandthere 6.$) wasnoevidencethatthedefendantwillfullyrefusedtomakethepayments,thetrialcourt 0&+ erredinrevokinghiscommunitycorrectionssentence.However,thetrialcourtdidnot 1n(- revokethedefendantssentencesolelyonthebasisofhisfailuretomaketherequired 3:*/ payments.Thetrialcourtemphasizedthedefendantsfailuretoreporttotheprogram f5,1 whenmakingitsdecisiontorevokethedefendantssentence.Thedefendantsfailure 27-3 toreportissufficientgroundsuponwhichthetrialcourtcouldbaseitsdecisiontorevoke `  thedefendantssentence.SeeT.C.A.4035311;Harkins,811S.W.2dat82.Assuch, ,  thisissueiswithoutmerit.     Afterareviewoftherecordbeforeus,weconcludethattherecordcontains 0 sufficientprooftoenablethetrialcourttomakeanintelligentandconscientiousdecision. \  Thetrialcourtdidnotabuseitsdiscretioninrevokingthedefendantscommunity (  correctionssentence.Accordingly,thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.      L      T   ______________________________ ,    L      T   JOHNH.PEAY,Judge r CONCUR:   ______________________________ !B NORMAM.OGLE,Judge "( ______________________________  &  ALANE.GLENN,Judge '!