ÿWPCë# …UBV %˜U .žÌnXÜ 0P4 4„ ˜ 0”˜ 0D, w p 0Jz 0TÄ 0^ 0hv 0rÞ 0|P 0†Ì 0R 1uâ U,W 0dƒ Bç D3U,7 0@cU 6£B)ÙDC AMEE’U×Õ,„p…v~õvÓs AOF"Æ•" 0D[# D/Ÿ# BÎ#<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiX%ä2¼A`ArialTT3|X«<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXxþ6X@ÉJQX@%ä2¼A`ArialTTt10cpiXXXä2¼P±ŠQXP((­À$¡¡ÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  Óà~| (D(3¾Á$¤¤Ý ƒ­À!ÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà œ àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÓ€2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ d$$$$'ÿÿdxd< Œ 9p`(Monaco("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò< Œ 9p`(Courier New% Line 7 d////7Border 1dd€-0Cþÿ << Gÿÿ ;Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€"ÔÔ€.ÔÒ D ÒÒ ¦ ÒÝ  ÝÔ€ÔÔ€ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€XÔÌÌò òAprilÏ24,Ï1996ÌÌCecilÏCrowson,ÏJr.ÌÔ€ôÔAppellateÏCourtÏClerkó ó KÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€"ÔÔ€.ÔÒ D ÒÒ ¦ ÒÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€.ôÔÔ€ÔThe€defendant€was€indicted€in€August€1993€as€ð ðJenny€Wilson,€Alias.ðð€€In€the€technical€recordÏof€this€matter,€which€includes€several€earlier€indictments€also€referencing€the€name€ð ðJenny€Wilson,ÏAlias,ðð€is€an€order€entered€March€16,€1989,€whereby€these€other€indictments€were€amended€to€changeÏthe€name€to€ð ðDebra€Cole.ðð€€In€September€1993,€the€defendant,€by€her€attorney,€filed€a€motion€in€thisÏcase€in€which€her€name€is€listed€as€ð ðDeborah€Cole€Blue.ðð€€Subsequent€pleadings€in€this€case€alsoÏdesignate€her€name€as€ð ðDeborah€Blue.ðð€€The€defendantððs€presentence€report€lists€her€name€asÏð ðDeborah€Cole€Wilson€Blue.ðð€€The€report€also€indicates€that€she€is€currently€married€to€a€Mr.€Blue€and€thatÏher€ex„husbandððs€last€name€is€ð ðCole.ðð€€Her€maiden€name€is€ð ðWilson.ðð€€The€policy€of€this€Court€is€to€useÏthe€indicted€name.Ì ËÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€"ÔÔ€.ÔÒ D ÒÒ ¦ ÒÝ  ÝÔ€Ôà àà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÔ€ôÔBecause€all€three€indicted€offenses€arose€out€of€a€single€sale€of€cocaine,€principles€ofÏdouble€jeopardy€prohibit€the€defendant€from€being€convicted€of€all€three€offenses.€€òòState€v.€Williamsóó,Ï623€S.W.2d€121,€125€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1981).Ì zÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€"ÔÔ€.ÔÒ D ÒÒ ¦ ÒÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€.ôÔÔ€Ô€These€are€verbatim€repetitions€of€the€written€transcripts€of€the€recorded€phone€calls,€whichÏwere€introduced€into€evidence.Ô€.ÔÌ fÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€"ÔÔ€.ÔÒ D ÒÒ ¦ ÒÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€.ôÔÔ€ÔThis€is€also€a€duplicate€of€the€written€transcript€prepared€from€the€tape€recorded€conversationÏand€introduced€into€evidence.ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'@Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA:Op Monaco ÒÒ  BA:Op Monaco Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€"ÔÓ&€,,X„d&ÓÑ#€,,Xd#ÑÔ€.ÔÒ D ÒÒ ¦ ÒÝ  ÝÑ ` ÑÑ X ÑÑ7€—‰XXdÈdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÓ  ÓÔ€ÔÙ€€ÙßL€120;+'h|` 81 `€€Lß›à àà àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINALÏAPPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌà@ àAT€KNOXVILLEÌà àà àà àà àà àÌÓ  Óà@ àJANUARY€1996€SESSIONÌÌÌÌó óÌò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà à)ó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àò ò)ó óà àò òC.C.A.ÏNO.€œ03C01›„9508„CC„00221ó óÌà àà àAppellee,à àò ò€€€€€à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àœBLOUNT›ÏCOUNTYó óÌœVS›.à àà àà àà àà àà àò ò)ÌJENNY€WILSON,Ïa/k/a,à àà àà à)à àHON.€D.€KELLY€THOMAS,ÏJR.€,ÌDEBORAH€BLUE,€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à à)Ïà àJUDGEÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àó óAppellant.ò òà àà àà à)à àó ó(Possession€of€cocaine€with€intent€to€à àà àà àà àà àà àò ò)ó óà àsellÏor€deliver;€sale€of€cocaine;Ïà àà àà àà àà àà àò ò)ó óà àdelivery€ofÏcocaine)à àà àà àò òÌó óÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANT:óóà àà àà à€€€€€òòà àFOR€THEÏAPPELLEE:óóÌÌÌò òDONALD€A.ÏBOSCHà àà àà àà àCHARLES€W.ÏBURSONÌó ó2000€First€Tennessee€Plazaà àà àà àAttorneyÏGeneral€&€Reporterò òÌó óKnoxville,€TN€€€37929ò òÌó ó€€€€€€€(On€Appeal)à àà àà àà àò òà àEUGENEÏJ.€œHONEA›ó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àœAsst›.€Attorney€GeneralÌò òKEVIN€W.€SHEPHERDó óà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€Pkwy.à àÌ318€Court€St.à àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493ÌœMaryville›,€TN€€€37801à àà àà àà àÌ€€€€€€€(At€Trial)à àà àà àà àò òà àMIKE€FLYNNó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà àà àà àà àò òà àà àà àEDWARD€P.€BAILEY,€JR.ó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àœAsst›.€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àœBlount›€County€Courthouseà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àœMaryville›,€TN€€€37801Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àÌOPINION€FILED:____________________ÌÌÌÌò òAFFIRMEDó óÌÌÌò òJOHN€H.€PEAY,ó óÌJudgeÌÇÑ  Ñà@ àò òòòO€P€I€N€I€O€NÌÌÌó óóóÌÓ  ÓÓÓà àà àThe€defendant× ƒ3 ××  ×€was€indicted€for€possession€of€cocaine€with€intent€toÏsell€or€deliver,€the€sale€of€cocaine,€and€the€delivery€of€cocaine.€€After€a€jury€trial,€sheÏwas€convicted€of€all€three€offenses€which€the€trial€court€later€merged€into€a€singleÏconviction.× ƒ4 ××  ×€€In€this€direct€appeal,€the€defendant€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€theÏevidence,€and€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€denied€her€motion€for€a€newÏtrial€based€on€newly€discovered€evidence.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€below.Ìà àà àÌà àà àThe€defendant€was€apprehended€through€the€use€of€a€confidentialÏinformant,€Kim€Orange.€€Officer€Jim€Harris,€director€of€Blount€Metro€Narcotics,Ïarranged€with€Orange€for€her€to€make€cocaine€purchases.€€Orange€was€paid€fiftyÍdollars€($50)€per€purchase.€ÌÌà àà àOn€March€26,€1993,€Orange€contacted€Officer€Harris€and€told€him€sheÏð ðhad€a€cocaine€deal€set€up€for€that€afternoon.ðð€€Officer€Harris€then€met€with€OrangeÏand€furnished€her€some€surveillance€equipment,€including€a€tape€recorder€to€recordÏher€phone€conversations€and€a€radio€transmitter.€€The€purpose€of€the€transmitter€wasÏto€enable€officers€stationed€near€Orangeððs€residence€to€simultaneously€monitor€andÏrecord€her€conversations€with€people€within€her€house.€€Officer€Harris€also€providedÏOrange€the€cash€needed€to€make€the€buy.ÌÌà àà àAfter€giving€her€the€equipment,€Officer€Harris€returned€to€his€office.€ÏShortly€thereafter,€Orange€called€him€and€told€him€that€she€had€recorded€a€phoneÏcall.€€Officers€Harris€and€Scott€Carpenter€then€stationed€themselves€near€OrangeððsÏhouse,€arriving€at€2:20€p.m.€€About€thirty€minutes€later,€Leonard€Brantley€drove€upÏand€went€into€Orangeððs€residence.€€While€he€was€in€the€house,€the€officers€listened€toÏand€taped€his€conversation€with€Orange.€€After€two€minutes,€Brantley€left€and€droveÏaway.€€The€police€did€not€follow€him.€€A€few€minutes€later,€Orange€walked€to€theÏofficersðð€car,€returned€the€surveillance€equipment,€and€delivered€a€plastic€bagÏcontaining€cocaine.ÌÌà àà àPrior€to€Brantleyððs€arrival,€Orange€recorded€two€phone€calls€with€theÏdefendant€made€at€approximately€2:10€p.m.€€The€first€of€these€phone€calls€consistedÏof€the€following€conversation:ÌÒ ô ÒÒ ¦ ÒÓÓÌDefendant:à àHello.ÌÌOrange:à àHey,€Jenny.ÌÌDefendant:à àYeh.ÌÌOrange:à àI€forgot.€€Uh€.€.€.€uh€.€.€.€you€canððt€get€more€than€a€œ16th›€forÏme€can€you?ÌÌDefendant:à àYeh,€yeh,€but€let€me€know€what€you€want,€I€need€to€knowÏwhat€you€want,€I€mean,€I€mean,€I€canððt€be€œguessin›ðð€what€you€want.ÌÌOrange:à àHow€much€uh,€how€much€would€an€eight€ball€run?ÌÌDefendant:à àI€donððt€like€to€talk€on€the€phone,€you€know€that.ÌÌOrange:à àWell€then€just€do€the€œ16th›€then.ÌÌDefendant:à àAlright,€letððs€see€.€.€.€about€160€or€something€like€that€.€.€.Ï170€or€something€like€that€.€.€.€I€think.ÌÌOrange:à àNo,€just€get€the€œ16th›€and€I€check€back€with€you€orÏà àsomething€next€time.€€Ok€bye.ÌÌDefendant:à àOk.ÌÌÌÒ D ÒÒ ¦ ÒThe€second€recorded€phone€call€went€as€follows:× ƒ5 ××  ×ÌÒ ô ÒÒ ¦ ÒÌÌDefendant:à àYeh?ÌÌOrange:à àDid€you€get€to€hold€to€him?ÌÌDefendant:à àYeh,€.€.€.€theyððre€on€their€way€now€to€come€and€get€it€forÏyou.ÌÌOrange:à àThey€gotta€come€to€your€house€.€.€.€?ÌÌDefendant:à àYeh.ÌÌOrange:à àAnd€then€they€be€straight€on€here?ÌÌDefendant:à àYeh.ÌÌOrange:à àOk,€bye.ÌÌÌÒ D ÒÒ ¦ ÒÓÓà àà àAt€2:47€p.m.,€Brantley€arrived€and€had€the€following€conversation€withÏOrange€in€her€house:× ƒ6 ××  ×ÌÓÓÌÒ ô ÒÒ ¦ ÒOrange:à àWhat€have€you€got€for€me?€.€.€.€What€you€got?ÌÌBrantley:à àRocks.ÌÌOrange:à à.€.€.€(illegible)[sic]€.€.€.€ninety„five?ÌÌBrantley:à àYes.ÌÌOrange:à àWhat€you€been€up€to€today?ÌÌBrantley:à à.€.€.€(illegible)[sic]€.€.€.€ÌÌOrange:à àœRippin›€and€running?ÌÌBrantley:à àHad€to€go€to€work.ÌÌOrange:à à[blank]ÌÌBrantley:à àSaid€I€had€to€go€to€work€today.ÌÌOrange:à à(Counting)€60,€80,€90,€95.€€That€should€take€care€of€you.ÌÌBrantley:à àI€hear€you.ÌÌOrange:à àœAllright›.€€Appreciate€it.€€I€might€holler€at€you€later.ÌÌBrantley:à àOk.ÌÌOrange:à àTell€her€I€said€appreciate€it.ÌÌBrantley:à àOk.ÌÌÌÌÒ D ÒÒ ¦ ÒÓÓà àà àBoth€Officer€Harris€and€Orange€testified€that€they€recognized€the€voiceÏin€the€phone€calls€as€the€defendantððs.€€Officer€Harris€also€testified€that€an€ð ðeight„ballððÏis€an€eighth€of€an€ounce€of€cocaine,€or€approximately€three€and€one„half€grams,€andÍthat€a€ð ðsixteenthðð€is€one„half€of€an€eight„ball.ÌÌà àà àOrange€testified€that€Brantley€had€delivered€to€her€the€same€amount€ofÏcocaine€that€she€had€ordered€from€the€defendant.€€She€testified€that€Brantley€œhadÏhad›€no€way€of€knowing€to€deliver€that€quantity€of€cocaine€to€her,€or€how€much€he€wasÏsupposed€to€be€paid€for€it,€except€through€her€œconversations›€with€the€defendant.€€SheÏalso€testified€that€she€had€not€known€Brantley€would€be€the€delivery€boy€until€he€gotÏthere,€although€she€also€testified€that€he€had€a€reputation€as€a€ð ðrunning€boy.ðð€€OnÏcross„examination,€she€denied€that€the€cocaine€had€already€been€in€her€house.€€SheÏalso€denied€ever€having€dealt€drugs,€although€she€admitted€that€she€had€usedÏcocaine€in€the€past,€having€quit€using€it€in€1991.ÌÌà àà àThe€defendant€argues€that€no€one€testified€to€having€seen€her€inÏpossession€of,€selling€or€delivering€the€cocaine;€that€no€one€testified€that€BrantleyÏhad€picked€up€the€cocaine€from€her;€and€that€no€one€testified€that€Brantley€hadÏdelivered€the€buy€money€to€her.€€She€argues€that€all€of€the€evidence€against€her€isÏcircumstantial€and€that€it€is€not€sufficient€to€support€her€conviction.ÌÌà àà àA€defendant€challenging€the€sufficiency€of€the€proof€has€the€burden€ofÍillustrating€to€this€Court€why€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€support€the€verdictÏreturned€by€the€trier€of€fact€in€his€or€her€case.€€This€Court€will€not€disturb€a€verdict€ofÏguilt€for€lack€of€sufficient€evidence€unless€the€facts€contained€in€the€record€and€anyÏinferences€which€may€be€drawn€from€the€facts€are€insufficient,€as€a€matter€of€law,€forÏa€rational€trier€of€fact€to€find€the€defendant€guilty€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòState€v.ÏœTuggle›óó,€639€S.W.2d€913,€914€(Tenn.€1982).ÌÌ€à àà àWe€must€review€the€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€theÏprosecution€in€determining€whether€"òòanyóó€rational€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€theÏessential€elements€of€the€crime€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt."€€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,Ï443€U.S.€307,€319,€99€S.Ct.€2781,€61€L.Ed.2d€560€(1979).€€We€do€not€reweigh€or€re„evaluate€the€evidence€and€are€required€to€afford€the€State€the€strongest€legitimateÏview€of€the€proof€contained€in€the€record€as€well€as€all€reasonable€and€legitimateÏinfer‚ences€which€may€be€drawn€therefrom.€€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835Ï(Tenn.€1978).€ÌÌà àà àQuestions€concerning€the€credibility€of€witnesses,€the€weight€and€valueÏto€be€given€to€the€evidence,€as€well€as€factual€issues€raised€by€the€evidence€areÏresolved€by€the€trier€of€fact,€not€this€Court.€€òòCabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835.€€A€guiltyÍverdict€rendered€by€the€jury€and€approved€by€the€trial€judge€accredits€the€testimonyÏof€the€witnesses€for€the€State,€and€a€presumption€of€guilt€replaces€the€presumption€ofÏinnocence.€€òòState€v.€Graceóó,€493€S.W.2d€474,€476€(Tenn.€1973).Ìà àà àÌà àà àAlthough€much€of€the€evidence€of€the€defendant's€guilt€is€circumstantialÏin€nature,€it€is€a€well€established€principle€of€law€in€this€state€that€circumstantialÏevidence€alone€may€be€sufficient€to€support€a€conviction.€€òòState€v.€œButtrey›óó,€756ÏS.W.2d€718,€721€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988).€€However,€in€order€for€this€to€occur,€theÏcircumstantial€evidence€"must€be€not€only€consistent€with€the€guilt€of€the€accused€butÏit€must€also€be€inconsistent€with€his€[or€her]€innocence€and€must€exclude€every€otherÏreasonable€theory€or€hypothesis€except€that€of€guilt."€€òòState€v.€œTharpe›óó,€726€S.W.2dÏ896,€900€(Tenn.€1987).€€In€addition,€"it€must€establish€such€a€certainty€of€guilt€of€theÏaccused€as€to€convince€the€mind€beyond€a€rea‚sonable€doubt€that€[the€defendant]€isÏthe€one€who€committed€the€crime."€€òòœTharpe›óó,€726€S.W.2d€at€896.€€Moral€certainty€as€toÏeach€element€of€the€offense€is€required,€but€absolute€certainty€is€not.€€òòœTharpe›óó,€726ÏS.W.2d€at€896.ÌÌà àà àWhile€following€the€above€guidelines,€this€Court€must€remember€thatÏthe€jury€decides€the€weight€to€be€given€to€circumstantial€evidence€and€that€"[œt]he›Íinferences€to€be€drawn€from€such€evidence,€and€the€extent€to€which€the€cirƒcumstances€are€consistent€with€guilt€and€inconsistent€with€innocence€are€questionsÏprimarily€for€the€jury."€€òòœMarable›€v.€Stateóó,€313€S.W.2d€451,€457€(Tenn.€1958);€òòState€v.ÏœCoury›óó,€697€S.W.2d€373,€377€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1985);€òòœPruitt›€v.€Stateóó,€460€S.W.2dÏ385,€391€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1970).€€ÌÌà àà àThe€testimony€at€trial€established€that€Orange€had€three€phoneÏconversations€with€the€defendant,€two€of€which€were€recorded,€in€which€sheÏrequested€to€purchase€a€ð ðsixteenthðð€of€cocaine,€and€in€which€the€price€of€this€buy€wasÏset.€€The€testimony€further€established€that,€within€less€than€an€hour€of€theseÏconversations,€Brantley€drove€up€to€Orangeððs€house€and€delivered€the€agreed€uponÏamount€of€cocaine€for€the€agreed€upon€price.€€There€was€no€evidence€whatsoeverÏthat€Brantley€had€obtained€the€cocaine€from€anyone€other€than€the€defendant.ÌÌà àà àAlthough€the€defendant€spends€many€words€arguing€that€the€StateÏnever€proved€that€she€possessed€the€cocaine€either€actually€or€constructively,€weÏdisagree.€€The€second€recorded€phone€call€between€the€informant€and€the€defendantÏreveals€that€the€person€who€will€deliver€the€cocaine€must€first€come€to€theÏdefendantððs€house€to€pick€it€up.€€Specifically,€when€the€informant€asked€if€ð ðtheyðð€haveÍto€come€to€ð ðyour€houseðð€to€get€ð ðit,ðð€the€defendant€replied€yes.€€Thus,€the€jury€couldÏreasonably€conclude€that€the€cocaine€was€located€at€the€defendantððs€residence.€€ð ðIf€itÏcan€be€shown€that€a€defendant€was€an€owner€or€had€possession€of€the€premisesÏ[where€the€drugs€are€located],€an€inference€is€created€that€the€defendant€had€controlÏover€or€possession€of€the€contraband.€€It€is€a€jury€question€as€to€ownership€of€drugsÏbased€on€occupancy.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ashóó,€729€S.W.2d€275,€280€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1986)Ï(citation€omitted).€ÌÌà àà àThe€evidence€in€this€case€was€sufficient€for€a€rational€trier€of€fact€toÏconclude€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€the€defendant€possessed€the€cocaine€atÏissue€with€the€intent€to€sell€or€deliver€it,€that€she€did€sell€it,€and€that€she€arranged€forÏits€delivery.€€Accordingly,€the€defendantððs€conviction€is€affirmed.ÌÌœ›à àà àAs€to€the€defendantððs€contention€that€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€did€notÏgrant€her€motion€for€new€trial€based€on€newly€discovered€evidence,€we€againÏdisagree.Ô€.Ô€Ô€ÔWhen€deciding€whether€or€not€the€evidence€merits€the€granting€of€a€newÏtrial,€the€trial€court€must€determine€whether€the€result€of€the€trial€would€likely€beÏchanged€if€the€evidence€were€produced.€€òòEvans€v.€Stateóó,€557€S.W.2d€927,€938Ï(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1977).€€The€granting€or€refusal€of€a€new€trial€on€the€basis€of€newlyÍdiscovered€evidence€rests€within€the€sound€discretion€of€the€trial€court.€€òòœHawkins›€v.ÏStateóó,€220€Tenn.€383,€417€S.W.2d€774,€778€(1967).€€ÌÌà àà à€€The€ð ðnewly€discovered€evidenceðð€in€this€case€consisted€in€part€ofÏOrangeððs€œmisdemeanor›€arrest€for€drug„related€activity€which€she€allegedly€engagedÏin€after€the€trial.€€The€trial€court€found€that€this€was€not€ð ðthe€type€of€evidence€that€isÏcontemplated€by€newly„discovered€evidence€to€justify€a€new€trial.ðð€€The€trial€courtÏwas€correct€in€this€respect€because€the€activity€for€which€Orange€was€arrestedÏoccurred€after€the€trial.€€€The€concept€of€newly€discovered€evidence€involvesÏevidence€which€actually€existed€as€of€the€time€of€trial,€but€went€undiscovered€throughÏno€lack€of€diligence€on€the€part€of€the€defendant€(or€her€counsel).ÌÌÓÓà àà àAlso€presented€as€newly€discovered€evidence€was€Brantleyððs€testimony€ÌÌthat€he€had€not€obtained€the€cocaine€from€the€defendant€on€the€day€in€question,€and€ÌÌthat€he€had€not€delivered€any€cocaine€to€Orange€on€the€day€in€question.€€BrantleyÏhad€ÌÌbeen€served€on€the€morning€of€the€new€trial€hearing€with€an€indictment€charging€him€ÌÌwith€possessing,€selling€and€delivering€cocaine€in€the€same€incident€for€which€the€ÌÌdefendant€was€convicted.€€After€hearing€€Brantleyððs€testimony,€the€trial€court€found€ÌÌÌÒ ô ÒÒ ° Òthat,€number€one,€he€[Brantley]€has€a€serious€felony€record,€[and]Ïnumber€two,€he€has€trafficked€in€drugs€before€and€.€.€.€he€isÏcharged€as€a€co„defendant€or€is€indicted€for€the€same€transactionÏthat€[the€defendant]€was€convicted€of.€€His€demeanor€on€theÏwitness€stand€does€not€do€anything€to€help€his€credibility.€€AndÏwhen€taken€together€with€his€record€and€his€testimony€about€hisÏdealings€in€controlled€substances,€his€testimony€that€he€was€notÏat€Ms.€Orangeððs€home€on€that€day,€I€donððt€think,€is€going€to€carryÏmuch€weight€and€is€not€very€apt€to€affect€the€outcome.ÌÌÌÌÒ D ÒÒ ¦ ÒÓÓà àà àThe€defendant€has€not€shown€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€inÏdetermining€that€Brantleyððs€testimony€was€not€likely€to€have€resulted€in€her€acquittal.€ÏAccordingly,€we€agree€with€the€trial€courtððs€denial€of€the€defendantððs€motion€for€a€newÏtrial,€and€the€judgment€below€is€affirmed.€Ìà àÌÓÓÌà àà àà àà àà àà à______________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àJOHN€H.€PEAY,€JudgeÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ_________________________________ÌJOE€B.€JONES,€JudgeÌÌÌÌ_________________________________ÌDAVID€H.€WELLES,€Judge