ÿWPC* …# VUNa %¯ 0 (µ4Ýñ 0 l 0Dt w@¸ 0Jø 0TB 0^– 0hô 0r\ 0|Î 0†J 0Ð 1u` U ,Õ 0À BÁU,Þ D3 U>=U*{ 0@¥B)åDC AMQ,ž…ÊçOz6ѰNâÏN±%ÿv~$!vÓ¢" AOu(ÆÄ( 0DŠ) D/Î) Bý)˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 (ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡ypÑ ppppdp3|x((3üÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó ôEõVö¨÷PøaùPúDûEüýÓ€2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernPp ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓÑ\R€€\Ñ d< Œ 9p`(Monaco$$$$'ÿÿdxd< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman< Œ 9p`(Arial("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò% Line 7 d00007Border 1dd€-2Cþÿ << Gÿÿ "Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€+ÔÝ  ÝÔ€,ÔÔ€,ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€,XÔÌÌò òJuly€23,€1996ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€,ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó {Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€+ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÔ€,ÔÔ€,&ÔThese€sentences€were€ordered€to€be€served€consecutive€to€a€sentence€from€which€theÏappellant€had€previously€been€on€parole.€€Ô€,XÔÌ ÝÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€+ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÔ€,ÔÔ€,&ÔThe€driver€of€the€car,€Brandon€Noble€Cody,€was€also€arrested€and€the€two€were€triedÏtogether.€€Although€found€guilty€of€evading€arrest€and€possession€of€drug€paraphernalia,€Mr.ÏCodyððs€case€forms€no€part€of€this€appeal.Ô€,XÔ€€Ì pÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€+ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÔ€+&ÔÔ€,ÔThe€State€argues€that€the€appellant€does€not€have€standing€to€challenge€the€validity€ofÏthe€stop€of€the€vehicle.€€Because€we€determine€that€the€stop€was€lawful€we€decline€to€reach€theÏissue€of€whether€the€appellant€had€standing€to€challenge€the€stop€of€the€vehicle.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.ÏDavid€M.€Gooch€&€Kenneth€Morganóó,€No.€88„118„111€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€at€Nashville,€JanuaryÏ31,€1989).Ì ÇÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€+ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÔ€+&ÔÔ€,ÔThe€disorderly€conduct€statute€provides,€in€pertinent€part,€that€it€is€an€offense€to€ð ðmakeÏunreasonable€noise€which€prevents€others€from€carrying€on€lawful€activities.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ïðð€39„17„305(b)€(1991€Repl.).€The€court€found€that€while€the€state€could€not€prove€beyond€aÏreasonable€doubt€that€the€€statute€€had€been€violated,€the€loud€stereo€gave€Officer€Spriggs€aÏreasonable€suspicion€that€an€offense€was€taking€place.€€Ô€,XÔÔ€+ÔÌ DÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€+ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÒ € ÒÒ X Ò€Ô€+&ÔÔ€,ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114€(1)€(1995€Supp.)Ô€+ÔÔ€+XÔ.Ì ØÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€+ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÔ€+&ÔÔ€,ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114€(8)€(1995€Supp.).€€We€note€that€this€factor€is€technicallyÏinapplicable€because€it€requires€a€previous€unwillingness€to€comply€with€conditions€of€aÏsentence€involving€release€into€the€community.€€òòState€v.€Hayesóó,€899€S.W.2d€175,€185„86Ï(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€€Enhancement€factor€(13)€would€apply,€however,€because€theÏappellant€was€on€parole€when€he€committed€these€crimes.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114Ï(13)(B).€€Ô€+ÔÔ€+XÔÌ DÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€+ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÒ € ÒÒ X Ò€Ô€+&ÔÔ€,ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113€(1)€(1990€Repl.).Ô€,XÔÔ€+ÔÌ Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€+ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÔ€,ÔÔ€,&Ô€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113€(13)€(1990€Repl.).ÌPtPtStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Monaco ÒÒ  BA Op Monaco Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÓ&€))X„d&ÓÑ#€))Xd#ÑÔ€+ÔÝ  ÝÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÑ7€¦%XXdìdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€,ÔÑ\R AØ'\ÑÓ ` °œXÓÙ€€ÙßL€342;+'h|` Å `€€Lß›à@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINALÏAPPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌà@ àAT€KNOXVILLEÌÌà@ àAPRIL€1996€SESSIONÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà à)à àNO.€03C01„9508„CC„00245Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌà àà àAppelleeà àà àà à)à àSULLIVAN€COUNTYÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)ÌV.à àà àà àà àà àà à)à àHON.€R.€JERRY€BECK€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àJUDGE€ÌBRENT€ALLEN€BLYE,à àà àà à)à àÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à à€(Possession€of€Cocaine€with€Intent€toÏà àà àà àà àà àà à)à à€€€Sell;€Evading€Arrest)Ìà àAppellantà àà àà àà à)à à€€ÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à àà àà àà àòòFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:ÌÌGreg€Lauderbackà àà àà àà àà àCharles€W.€BursonÌ434€Shelby€Street€€€à àà àà àà àAttorney€General€and€ReporterÌP.O.€Box€976à àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌKingsport,€Tennessee€37660à àà àà àNashville,€Tennessee€37243„0493ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àElizabeth€T.€RyanÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€Atty.€Gen.€&€ReporterÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àNashville,€Tennessee€37243„0493ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àH.€Greeley€Wells,€Jr.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àDavid€OverbayÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àP.O.€Box€526Ïà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àBlountville,ÏTennessee€37617„0526Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóà àÌÌAffirmedÌÌWilliam€M.€Barker,€JudgeòòÌÌÓ Ð ÓÌÓÓà@ àOPINIONóóÌThe€appellant,€Brent€Allen€Blye,€appeals€as€of€right€from€the€judgment€of€theÏCriminal€Court€of€Sullivan€County.€€The€appellant€was€found€guilty€by€a€jury€ofÏpossession€of€over€0.5€grams€of€cocaine€with€the€intent€to€sell,€and€evading€arrest.€ÏThe€jury€affixed€fines€of€$50,000€for€the€conviction€of€possession€of€cocaine€andÏ$2,500€for€the€evading€arrest€conviction.€€The€trial€court€ordered€the€appellant€toÏserve€concurrent€sentences€of€ten€(10)€years€for€the€drug€conviction€and€eleven€(11)Ïmonths€and€twenty„nine€(29)€days€for€the€evading€arrest€conviction.× ƒ6 ××  ×€€ÌOn€appeal,€the€appellant€presents€two€issues€for€our€review:ÌÓ` °„XZÀ–XÓÓÓà8 à1.à8 àWhether€the€trial€court€erred€by€denying€theÏdefendantððs€motion€to€suppress€evidence.ÌÌà à2.à8 àWhether€the€trial€court€erred€by€enhancing€theÏdefendantððs€sentence.ÌÌÓÓAfter€a€careful€review€of€the€record€on€appeal,€briefs€of€the€parties,€andÏapplicable€law,€we€determine€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€denying€the€appellantððsÏmotion€to€suppress€evidence€or€in€the€imposition€of€the€sentences.€€ÌÌà@ àò òFACTUAL€BACKGROUNDó óÌWhile€on€routine€patrol€on€July€8,€1994,€Officer€Dion€Spriggs€of€the€KingsportÏPolice€Department€spotted€a€black€Chevrolet€Cavalier€being€driven€on€the€street€withÏits€stereo€blaring€loudly.€€Officer€Spriggs€estimated€that€the€car€was€approximately€75Ïto€100€feet€away€from€him€when€he€first€heard€the€music.€€He€followed€the€car€a€shortÏdistance,€activated€his€blue€lights,€and€ultimately€stopped€the€car.€€Officer€SpriggsÏtestified€that€the€purpose€of€the€stop€was€not€to€issue€a€citation€to€the€driver,€but€toÏinform€him€that€he€was€violating€a€city€noise€ordinance€which€prohibits€one€fromÏmaking€unnecessary€noise€that€can€be€heard€over€25€feet€away.€€Immediately€uponÏstopping€the€car,€the€officer€began€to€radio€his€position€to€the€dispatch€officer.€ÏHowever,€before€the€officer€could€transmit€his€location€and€the€purpose€of€the€stop€toÏdispatch,€the€appellant,€who€was€a€passenger€in€the€car,€stepped€out€of€the€car.€€TheÏofficer€immediately€ordered€the€appellant€to€get€back€into€his€car.€€The€appellantÍrefused€the€officerððs€command,€stating€that€he€did€not€have€to€stay.€€The€appellantÏthen€fled€on€foot€into€a€nearby€housing€project.€€At€about€the€same€time,€two€otherÏofficers€of€the€Kingsport€Police€Department€appeared€on€the€scene.€€When€OfficerÏDavid€Samples€saw€Officer€Spriggs€chasing€the€appellant,€he€joined€in€the€chase.€ÏDuring€the€pursuit,€Officer€Spriggs€saw€the€appellant€drop€a€clear€plastic€bagÏcontaining€what€was€ultimately€determined€to€be€cocaine.€€After€the€appellant€wasÏapprehended,€arrested,€and€placed€in€a€patrol€car,€the€officers€went€back€to€whereÏthe€appellant€had€dropped€the€bag€of€cocaine€and€recovered€it.× ƒ8 ××  ×€€ÌIn€addition€to€recovering€11.6€grams€of€cocaine,€the€officers€seized€$558.70Ïand€a€package€of€cigarette€rolling€papers€during€a€search€of€the€appellant€which€wasÏmade€incident€to€his€arrest.€€Ìà@ àò òÌà@ àMOTION€TO€SUPPRESSó óÌThe€appellant€filed€a€motion€to€suppress€in€the€trial€court€asserting€that€theÏseized€items€should€be€suppressed€as€the€fruits€of€an€unlawful€stop€of€the€vehicle€inÏwhich€the€defendant€was€riding€as€a€passenger.€€The€appellant€contended€that€whenÏOfficer€Spriggs€stopped€the€car,€he€did€not€have€a€reasonable€suspicion,€supportedÏby€specific€and€articulable€facts,€that€an€offense€had€been€or€was€about€to€beÍcommitted€as€required€by€òòTerry€v.€Ohioóó,€392€U.S.€1,€88€S.Ct.€1868,€20€L.€Ed.€2d€889Ï(1968).× ƒ: ××  ×€€The€trial€court€overruled€the€appellantððs€suppression€motion.€Ì€The€findings€of€the€trial€court€on€a€motion€to€suppress€are€conclusive€onÏappeal€unless€the€evidence€preponderates€against€the€judgment.€€òòState€v.€Tateóó,€615ÏS.W.2d€161,€162€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1981).€€The€trial€court€found€that€there€was€a€loudÏnoise€blaring€from€the€car€prior€to€Officer€Spriggs€stopping€the€car.€€The€court€furtherÏstated;ÌÓÓà8 à€ððthere€is€evidently,€a€city€ordinance€in€Kingsport€asÏ[Appellantððs€counsel]€alluded€to€in€writing€in€his€pleading,Ïand€cited.€€Mr.€Hickman€asked€.€.€.€questions€from€it,€andÏthe€officer€described€it,€and€[the€assistant€district€attorney]Ïasked€questions€about€it;€but€nobody€ever€introduced€it.€ÏSo,€I€just€know€there€is€a€city€ordinance,€and€everybodyÏseems€to€agree€that€it€applies€to€noise.ððÌÓÓÌHaving€found€that€there€is€a€noise€ordinance€in€Kingsport,€the€trial€courtÏfurther€found€that€the€loud€stereo€playing€from€the€car€gave€Officer€Spriggs€aÍreasonable€basis€to€stop€the€car€both€under€the€city€ordinance€as€well€as€under€theÏdisorderly€conduct€statute€found€at€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€39„17„305.× ƒ> ××  ×ÌIn€òòState€v.€Stephen€C.€Cloydóó,€Washington€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€atÏKnoxville,€March€21,€1985)€(No€number€in€original)€òòperm.óó€òòtoóó€òòappealóó€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.Ï1985),€this€court€upheld€the€stop€of€a€vehicle€where€the€basis€of€the€stop€was€aÏviolation€of€the€Stateððs€muffler€law€found€at€Tennessee€€Code€Annotated€section€55„9„202(a).€€Subsequent€to€the€stop,€the€officer€had€reason€to€believe€the€driver€wasÏintoxicated€and€ultimately€arrested€him€for€driving€under€the€influence.€€€Likewise,€inÏthe€case€at€bar,€the€apparent€noise€ordinance€violation€gave€Officer€Spriggs€aÏreasonable€basis€upon€which€to€stop€the€vehicle€in€which€the€appellant€was€riding.€ÌThe€appellant€does€not€argue€that€Officer€Spriggs€had€no€lawful€right€toÏchase€him€as€he€fled€the€scene€of€the€traffic€stop.€€Nor€does€he€contest€that€theÏrecovery€by€the€officer€of€the€cocaine€which€the€appellant€abandoned€while€fleeingÏwas€proper.€€Again,€the€appellant€argues€that€the€initial€stop€of€the€vehicle€wasÏwithout€authority€and€that€the€money,€cigarette€rolling€papers€and€cocaine€seizedÏsubsequent€to€the€vehicle€stop€were€all€the€ð ðfruit[s]€of€the€poisonous€tree.ðð€€òòSeeóó,€òòe.góó.,ÏòòWong€Sun€v.€United€Statesóó,€371€U.S.€471,€485,€83€S.Ct.€407,€417,€9€L.Ed.2d€441Í(1963).€òòSeeóó€òòalsoóó€òòHughes€v.€Stateóó,€588€S.W.€2d€296,€307„08€(Tenn.€1979).€€We€holdÏthat€the€stop€of€the€vehicle€was€lawful.€€Therefore,€the€subsequent€seizure€of€theÏcocaine,€money,€and€rolling€papers€did€not€violate€the€appellantððs€right€to€be€freeÏfrom€unreasonable€searches€and€seizures.€€The€trial€courtððs€denial€of€the€appellantððsÏmotion€to€suppress€is€affirmed.ÌÌà@ àò òSENTENCING€ó óÌThe€appellant€also€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€imposed€a€tenÏ(10)€year€sentence€for€the€cocaine€conviction.€€As€a€Standard€Range€I€offenderÏconvicted€of€a€class€B€Felony,€the€offense€carried€with€it€a€range€of€punishmentÏbetween€eight€and€twelve€years.€€€€Ì€When€there€is€a€challenge€to€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€aÏsentence,€it€is€the€duty€of€this€court€to€conduct€a€òòde€novoóó€review€with€the€presumptionÏthat€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn€€Code€Ann.€Ô€+ÔððÔ€,Ô€40„35„401€(d)€(1990€Repl.).€œThis›€presumption€is€"conditioned€upon€the€affirmative€œshowingÏin›€œÇÓ  ÓÑ  Ñthe›€œrecord›€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevantÏfacts€and€circumstances."€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.€2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€Ìœà àIn›€sentencing€a€person€convicted€of€a€criminal€offense€the€trial€court€is€to€takeÏinto€consideration€€(1)€the€evidence,€if€any,€received€at€the€trial€and€at€the€sentencingÏhearing;€(2)€the€pre„sentence€report;€(3)€the€principles€of€sentencing€and€argumentsÏas€to€sentencing€alternatives;€€(4)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€the€criminalÏconduct€involved;€(5)€evidence€and€information€offered€by€the€parties€on€theÏenhancement€and€mitigating€factors€in€sections€40„35„113€and€40„35„114;€and€(6)Ïany€statement€the€defendant€wishes€to€make€in€his€own€behalf€about€sentencing.€ÏTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40„35„210(b)€(1995€Supp.).€€Ìœà àThe›€trial€court€found€that€the€appellant€had€a€previous€history€of€criminalÏconvictions€× ƒ@ ××  ×€and,€noting€that€he€was€on€parole€at€the€time€of€his€arrest,€found€that€theÏappellant€had€a€previous€unwillingness€to€comply€with€the€conditions€of€a€sentenceÏinvolving€release€into€the€community€œ× ƒA ××  ×›.€€The€court€considered€the€fact€that€theÍappellantððs€crimes€neither€caused€nor€threatened€serious€bodily€injury€× ƒB ××  ×€and€that€theÏappellantððs€parole€would€be€revoked€× ƒC ××  ×€as€mitigating€factors.€€However,€the€trial€courtÏfound€that€the€appellantððs€prior€criminal€history€outweighed€the€mitigating€factors€andÏtherefore€enhanced€the€sentence€to€ten€(10)€years.€€The€appellantððs€argument€is,Ïessentially,€that€the€trial€court€did€not€properly€weigh€the€applicable€enhancementÏand€mitigating€factors€in€this€case.€€Because€we€find€œthe›€trial€court€properlyÏconsidered€œ›€œthe€purposes›€and€principles€of€the€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989€ourÏreview€is€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€with€the€presumption€of€correctness.€€Accordingly,€we€concludeÏthat€the€trial€court€properly€sentenced€the€appellant€in€this€case€and€we€decline€toÏdisturb€the€trial€courtððs€judgment.€€€ÌThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed€in€all€respects.ÌÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌà àà àà àà àà àWILLIAM€M.€BARKER,€JUDGEÌÌœ›ÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌòòÌÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌGARY€R.€WADE,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌDAVID€H.€WELLES,€JUDGE