ÿWPC>" …# VU>a %Ÿ 0í¥UB’ 4Ô è n­÷ U:¤ Þ w@æ 01& 0DW 0J› 0Tå 0^9 0h— 0rÿ 0|q 0†í 0s 1u 0dx BÜU6ùU./U*]B)‡ D3°DCã AM& 0@s`³êåýfâv~HvÓÆ AO™ Æè 0D®! D/ò! B!"˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLHÎ<èÀ( 9Z &Courier RegularX(ÅÕÐ$¡¡Ñ  ÑÑ7€'CXXdÈXXdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÓiU°X` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXiÓ<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiÔ¡¨ 3|x=«<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXxþ6X@ÉJQX@,†r‰AZ‹"Arial Regular +,D-D.D/D0D12E3E4Ó€(á(3lM$¤¤Ý ƒÕÐ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ7€ËËXXdÈdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÓiU°X` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXiÓÝ  Ýà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ d< Œ 9p`(Courier New< Œ 9p`(Courier< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d'ÿÿdxd))))7Border 1dd€-+Cþÿ << Gÿÿ("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò VÝ ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€&ÔÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÓ` °˜XÓÝ  ÝÔ€(ÔÔ€(ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€(XÔÌÌJune€30,€1997ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔ  Ôó ó àÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€&ÔÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÓ` °˜XÓÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  Ý€Ô€(ÔÔ€(ôÔFor€post„conviction€petitions€filed€after€May€10,€1995,€petitioners€have€the€burden€of€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ïproving€factual€allegations€by€clear€and€convincing€evidence.€€T.C.A.€ðð€40„30„210(f)€(Supp.€1996).Ì ÛÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€&ÔÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÓ` °˜XÓÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÔ€(ÔÔ€(ôÔ€Ñ7ÀËÖXXdÈdÈ7Ñà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóó€As€a€matter€of€fact,€the€record€reflects€that€the€petitionerððs€real€complaints€dealt€with,Ïaccording€to€him,€how€the€Department€of€Correction€was€computing€his€parole€eligibility€for€his€sentencesÏin€a€manner€differently€than€he€had€expected.€€Thus,€his€ð ðgoalðð€in€this€proceeding€was€to€have€the€trialÏcourt€vacate€his€convictions€in€order€for€him€to€renegotiate€and€restructure€a€plea€agreement.Ì \Ñ\R AØ'\ÑPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€&ÔÑ  ÑÑ#€''Xd#ÑÑ#€''Xd#ÑÑ  ÑÓ` °˜XÓÝ  Ý›Ñ  ÑÑ Ü ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÓÓÑ\R AØ'\ÑÔ€(ÔÑ7€ Ìâ XXdæXXdÈ7ќـ€ÙßR€,.+A1-j|` ç `€€@ÿRß›Þ ÞÌà8 àà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àAT€NASHVILLEà@ à€€€€€€€€€Ìà àà à€€€€€€€€€€€€FEBRUARY€1996€SESSIONÌÌÓÓWILLIAM€œLEE›€BRAMLETT,à àœ)›à àÌ€à àà àà àà à)Ìà àAppellant,à àà à)à àNo.€01C01„9506„CC„00207Ìà à€€€€€à àà à€€à à)Ìà àà àà àà à)à àHumphreys€CountyÌv.à àà àà àà à)€€€€€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà à)à à€Honorable€Allen€W.€Wallace,€Judge€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà à)ÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,€€€€€à à)à à€(Post„Conviction)Ìà àà àà àà à)€€€€€€€€Ìà àAppellee.à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àÌÌòòFor€the€Appellantóó:à àà àà àà àòòFor€the€Appelleeóó:ÌÌShipp€R.€Weemsà àà àà àà àCharles€W.€BursonÌDistrict€Public€Defenderà àà àà àAttorney€General€of€TennesseeÌ€€€€€€€€€andà àà àà àà àà àà àandÌRobbie€T.€Bealà àà àà àà àSarah€M.€BranchÌAssistant€Public€Defenderà àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€General€of€Tennessee€ÌP.O.€Box€160à àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€Parkwayà àà àÌCharlotte,€TN€37036à àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àDan€Mitchum€AlsobrooksÌà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àCourt€Square,€P.O.€Box€580Ìà àà àà àà àà àCharlotte,€TN€37036„0580ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àGeorge€C.€SextonÌà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àHumphreys€County€Court€House€Ìà àà àà àà àà àWaverly,€TN€37185ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:____________________ÌÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌJoseph€M.€TiptonÌJudgeÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÓÓà@ àòòò òO€P€I€N€I€O€NÌó óóóÌà àThe€petitioner,€William€Lee€Bramlett,€appeals€as€of€right€from€theÏHumphreys€County€Criminal€Courtððs€dismissal€of€his€petition€for€post„conviction€relief.€€ÏThe€petitioner€pled€guilty€to€four€counts€of€grand€larceny,€two€counts€of€obtainingÏmoney€under€false€pretenses,€statutory€rape,€contributing€to€the€delinquency€of€aÏminor,€vandalism,€forgery,€passing€a€forged€instrument,€and€three€counts€of€passingÏworthless€checks.€€In€exchange€for€his€pleas,€he€received€an€effective€sentence€of€tenÏyears€for€the€various€convictions,€to€be€served€under€the€Community€Corrections€Act€ofÏ1985,€and€the€state€agreed€œto€the›€œdismissal€of›€several€other€charges.€€His€communityÍcorrections€sentence€was€eventually€revoked,€and€the€trial€court€ordered€that€he€serveÏhis€ten„year€sentence€in€the€Department€of€Correction.€€On€July€19,€1991,€the€petitionerÏfiled€a€òòproóó€òòseóó€petition€for€post„conviction€relief.€€Although€somewhat€rambling,€theÏpetition€alleged€that€the€petitioner€received€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel€andÏentered€an€involuntary€plea.€€The€trial€court€summarily€dismissed€the€petition.€€ThisÏcourt€reversed€the€summary€dismissal€and€remanded€the€case€for€the€appointment€ofÏcounsel.€€òòWilliam€Lee€Bramlett€v.€Stateóó,€No.€01C01„9202„CC„00049,€HumphreysÏCounty€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€May€19,€1994).€€After€the€appointment€of€counsel€and€anÏevidentiary€hearing,€the€trial€court€denied€the€petition€because€it€concluded€that€theÏpetitioner€understood€the€terms€of€his€original€plea€and€that€his€original€counsel€wasÏeffective€in€his€pretrial€preparation.€€The€petitioner€contests€these€findings€and€claimsÏthat€the€trial€court€improperly€refused€to€grant€his€request€for€a€copy€of€the€transcriptÏfrom€his€guilty€plea€submission€hearing.€ÌÌà àThe€petitioner€was€the€only€person€to€testify€at€the€post„convictionÏhearing.€€He€complained€that€his€trial€attorney€failed€to€explain€the€specifics€of€hisÏœcommunity›€œcorrections›€sentence.€€He€said€that€his€attorney€never€told€him€that€he€couldÏbe€resentenced€if€he€violated€the€terms€of€his€sentence.€€Although€he€recalled€meetingÏwith€his€attorney€and€a€corrections€officer€at€his€attorneyððs€office,€he€said€that€theÏcorrections€officer€only€told€him€that€he€would€be€required€to€serve€ninety€days€onÏhouse€arrest€and€would€be€required€to€enroll€in€a€GED€program.€€He€said€that€hisÍattorney€told€him€that€once€he€served€ninety€days€on€house€arrest,€paid€restitution,€andÏperformed€two€hundred€hours€of€public€service,€the€rest€of€his€sentence€would€beÏserved€on€probation.€€The€petitioner€also€complained€that€his€attorney€failed€to€Ïinvestigate€the€facts€of€his€case€adequately.ÌÌà àDuring€cross„examination,€the€petitioner€recalled€that€when€he€enteredÏhis€plea€he€knew€what€the€charges€were€against€him€and€knew€the€charges€to€whichÏhe€was€pleading€guilty.€€He€said€that€he€understood€that€he€had€œthe›€right€to€a€jury€trial,Ïthe€right€to€choose€whether€to€testify€and€the€right€to€cross„examine€witnesses.€€HeÏalso€said€that€he€understood€that€there€would€not€be€a€trial€if€he€pled€guilty.€€TheÏpetitioner€testified€that€he€understood€that€in€exchange€for€his€plea€he€would€receiveÏtwo€five„year€sentences€ð ðrun€togetherðð€with€all€of€his€other€sentences€to€be€servedÏconcurrently.€€He€again€criticized€his€attorney€for€telling€him€that€he€would€only€have€toÏserve€ninety€days€on€house€arrest€and€that€the€rest€of€his€sentence€would€be€onÏprobation.€€He€said€that€the€trial€judge€never€informed€him€that€he€may€end€up€servingÏthe€entire€ten„year€sentence.€€ÌÌà àThe€petitioner€recalled€being€told€that€he€would€serve€ten€years€at€thirtyÏpercent€when€he€violated€house€arrest.€€He€said€that€he€thought€he€would€have€toÏserve€thirty€percent€of€his€sentence€but€complained€that€he€had€already€served€fourÏyears€and€would€not€be€eligible€for€parole€again€for€another€two€years.ÌÌà àUnder€questioning€from€the€court,€the€petitioner€testified€that€he€enteredÏthe€plea€in€order€to€take€care€of€his€family€and€avoid€going€to€prison.€€He€admitted€thatÏthe€trial€court€explained€to€him€that€he€was€receiving€a€community€correctionsÏsentence€and€not€a€probationary€sentence.€€However,€he€said€that€he€did€notÏremember€the€court€ever€explaining€the€difference€between€the€two.€€He€also€admittedÏthat€he€signed€the€last€page€of€the€presentence€report,€a€behavioral€contractÏagreement,€and€a€restitution€agreement.€€The€paragraphs€directly€above€theÏdefendantððs€signature€on€the€presentence€report€œand›€the€restitution€agreement€warnÏthat€a€violation€of€the€terms€of€the€agreements€can€result€in€incarceration€andÏtermination€from€the€community€corrections€program.€€ÌÌà àThe€trial€court€concluded€that€the€petitioner€had€been€fully€advised€and€Ïwell€represented€by€counsel€when€he€entered€his€plea.€€In€reaching€its€decision,€theÏcourt€noted€that€it€did€not€increase€the€petitionerððs€sentence€when€he€violated€the€termsÏof€his€community€corrections€sentence,€although€an€increase€would€have€beenÏjustified.ÌÌò òà@ àIÌó óà àThe€petitioner€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€denying€him€post„conviction€relief€based€upon€his€claim€of€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel.€€He€arguesÍthat€in€the€absence€of€proof€from€the€state,€the€trial€court€should€have€granted€him€reliefÏon€the€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel€claim€based€on€the€allegations€in€the€òòproóó€òòseóóÏpetition€and€on€the€petitionerððs€testimony€concerning€his€attorneyððs€failure€toÏinvestigate€possible€defenses€and€failure€to€advise€him€of€his€rights.ÌÌà àThe€burden€was€on€the€petitioner€in€the€trial€court€to€prove€his€allegationsÏthat€would€entitle€him€to€relief€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence.œ× ƒ/ ××  ×›€€òòBrooks€v.€Stateóó,Ï756€S.W.2d€288,€289€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988).€€On€appeal,€we€are€bound€by€the€trialÏcourtððs€findings€unless€we€conclude€that€the€evidence€preponderates€against€thoseÏfindings.€€òòBlack€v.€Stateóó,€794€S.W.2d€752,€755€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1990).€€In€this€respect,Ïthe€petitioner€has€the€burden€of€illustrating€how€the€evidence€preponderates€againstÏthe€judgment€entered.€€òòIdóó.€Ìà àÌà àIn€òòBaxter€v.€Roseóó,€523€S.W.2d€930,€936€(Tenn.€1975),€our€supreme€courtÏdecided€that€attorneys€should€be€held€to€the€general€standard€of€whether€the€servicesÏrendered€were€within€the€range€of€competence€demanded€of€attorneys€in€criminalÏcases.€€Further,€the€court€stated€that€the€range€of€competence€was€to€be€measured€byÏthe€duties€and€criteria€set€forth€in€òòBeasley€v.€United€Statesóó,€491€F.2d€687,€696€(6th€Cir.Ï1974)€and€òòUnited€States€v.€DeCosteróó,€487€F.2d€1197,€1202„04€(D.C.€Cir.€1973),€òòcert.óóÍòòdeniedóó,€444€U.S.€944€(1979).€€Also,€in€reviewing€counsel's€conduct,€a€"fair€assessmentÏof€attorney€performance€requires€that€every€effort€be€made€to€eliminate€the€distortingÏeffects€of€hindsight,€to€reconstruct€the€circumstances€of€counsel's€challenged€conduct,Ïand€to€evaluate€the€conduct€from€counsel's€perspective€at€the€time."€€òòStrickland€v.ÏWashingtonóó,€466€U.S.€at€689,€104€S.€Ct.€at€2065;€òòseeóó€òòHellard€v.€Stateóó,€629€S.W.2d€4,€9Ï(Tenn.€1982)€(counsel's€conduct€will€not€be€measured€by€"20„20€hindsight").€€Thus,€theÏfact€that€a€particular€strategy€or€tactic€failed€or€even€hurt€the€defense€does€not,€alone,Ïsupport€a€claim€of€ineffective€assistance.€€Deference€is€made€to€trial€strategy€or€tacticalÏchoices€if€œthey›€are€informed€ones€based€upon€adequate€preparation.€€œòòHellardóó,›€629ÏS.W.2d€at€œ9;›œ€òòDeCosteróó,›€487€F.2d€at€1201.€€ÌÌà àAlso,€we€note€that€the€approach€to€the€issue€of€the€ineffective€assistanceÏof€counsel€does€not€have€to€start€with€an€analysis€of€an€attorney's€conduct.€€If€prejudiceÏis€not€shown,€we€need€not€seek€to€determine€the€validity€of€the€allegations€aboutÏdeficient€performance.€€òòStrickland€v.€Washingtonóó,€466€U.S.€at€697,€104€S.€Ct.€at€2069.ÏIn€this€vein,€the€petitioner€had€the€burden€of€demonstrating€that,€but€for€his€counselððsÏerrors,€he€would€have€insisted€on€having€a€trial.€€òòSeeóó€òòHill€v.€Lockartóó,€474€U.S.€52,€59,Ï106€S.€Ct.€366,€370€(1985);€òòBankston€v.€Stateóó,€815€S.W.2d€213,€215€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ï1991).€€ÌÌà àThe€petitioner€argues€that€his€trial€counsel€was€deficient€for€failing€toÏadvise€him€of€his€rights€and€failing€to€investigate€his€cases.€€However,€he€has€failed€to€Ïdemonstrate€that€he€was€prejudiced€by€the€alleged€deficiencies.€€According€to€theÏpetitionerððs€testimony,€he€understood€that€he€was€waiving€his€right€to€a€trial,€right€toÏcross„examine€witnesses€against€him,€and€the€right€not€to€testify€when€he€entered€hisÏplea.€€The€petitioner€also€testified€that€the€trial€court€informed€him€he€was€receiving€aÏcommunity€corrections€sentence€and€that€he€pled€guilty€to€avoid€going€to€prison.€€TheÏpetitioner€does€not€claim€that€his€counselððs€errors€caused€him€to€plead€guilty.€€To€theÏcontrary,€the€petitionerððs€attorney€informed€the€court€during€the€post„conviction€hearingÏthat€if€the€petition€for€post„conviction€relief€was€granted,€the€petitioner€would€seek€toÏenter€into€another€plea€agreement.œ× ƒ0 ××  ×›€€Under€these€circumstances,€the€trial€court€did€notÏerr€in€denying€post„conviction€relief€on€the€ground€of€ineffectiveness€of€trial€counsel.ÌÌà@ àò òIIÌó óà àThe€petitioner€also€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€denying€his€post„conviction€petition€because€the€record€does€not€demonstrate€that€he€was€adequatelyÏadvised€by€the€court€as€to€his€rights€or€his€understanding€of€the€terms€of€the€pleaÏbargain.€€He€argues€that€in€the€absence€of€proof€to€the€contrary,€this€court€must€assumeÍthat€the€trial€court€failed€to€advise€him.€€The€state€counters€that€the€petitioner€failed€toÏmeet€his€burden€of€proving€that€his€plea€was€involuntary€and€that€the€petitionerððs€ownÏtestimony€was€sufficient€to€establish€that€he€entered€a€knowing€and€voluntary€plea.€€WeÏagree.€ÌÌà àThe€issue€concerning€invalid€guilty€pleas€is€controlled€by€òòState€v.€Nealóó,Ï810€S.W.2d€131€(Tenn.€1991)€and€òòJohnson€v.€Stateóó,€834€S.W.2d€922€(Tenn.€1992),Ñ€1ÑÇwhich€bear€upon€the€procedural€and€substantive€requirements€for€the€entry€of€a€guiltyÏplea€in€order€that€a€valid€judgment€of€conviction€may€be€obtained€and€for€subsequentÏreview€of€the€validity€of€a€conviction€based€upon€a€guilty€plea.€€These€cases€stem,€inÏpart,€from€òòBoykin€v.€Alabamaóó,€395€U.S.€238,€243,€89€S.€Ct.€1709,€1712€(1969)€in€whichÏthe€Supreme€Court€stated€that€entry€of€a€guilty€plea€effectively€constituted€a€waiver€ofÏcertain€consti‚tutional€rights:€€the€right€against€compulsory€self„incrimina‚tion,€the€right€toÏconfront€one's€accusers,€and€the€right€to€trial€by€a€jury.€€òòBoykinóó€held€that€a€valid€waiverÏof€such€a€right€required€the€intentional€relin‚quishment€or€abandonment€of€a€knownÏright€and€that€such€a€waiver€may€not€be€presumed€from€a€silent€record.€€òòId.óó€€TheÏpetitionerððs€testimony€reflects€that€he€understood€at€the€time€he€entered€his€plea€thatÏhe€was€waiving€his€constitutional€rights€to€be€free€from€compulsory€self„incrimination,Ïto€a€trial€by€jury,€and€to€confront€and€cross„examine€witnesses.€€Therefore,€no€òòBoykinóóÏviolation€occurred.€€€ÌÌà àAlso,€there€is€nothing€in€the€record€before€us€to€indicate€that€the€petitionerÏwas€coerced€into€entering€his€plea.€€When€the€post„conviction€court€asked€theÏpetitioner€how€he€was€coerced€into€pleading€guilty,€the€petitioner€replied€that€he€pledÏguilty€because€he€wanted€to€take€care€of€his€family€and€avoid€going€to€prison.€€TheÏœpresentence›€report€and€the€restitution€agreement€the€petitioner€signed€explicitlyÏwarned€the€petitioner€that€he€could€be€incarcerated€if€he€failed€to€comply€with€the€termsÍof€his€sentences.€€The€record€supports€the€trial€courtððs€finding€that€the€petitionerÏknowingly€and€voluntarily€entered€his€pleas.€€€€€€Ìò òÌó óà@ àò òIIIó óÌà àFinally,€the€petitioner€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€not€grantingÏhis€request€for€a€transcript€of€his€guilty€plea€submission.€€When€the€post„convictionÏcourt€inquired€as€to€why€the€petitioner€needed€a€transcript€of€the€guilty€pleaÏsubmission,€the€petitionerððs€attorney€responded€that€the€transcript€was€needed€to€showÏthat€the€petitioner€was€not€advised€that€he€could€be€resentenced€if€he€violated€hisÏcommunity€corrections€sentence.€€The€trial€court€refused€to€grant€the€transcriptÏbecause€it€concluded€that€the€petitioner€was€not€entitled€to€relief€even€if€the€court€failedÏto€give€him€such€advice.€€We€agree€with€the€trial€courtððs€conclusion€under€theÏcircumstances€in€this€case.ÌÌà àUnder€T.C.A.€ðð€40„30„113(1990)€[repealed€1995],€a€post„conviction€courtÏhas€the€authority€to€furnish€an€indigent€petitioner€with€ð ðcertified€copies€of€suchÏdocuments€or€parts€of€the€record€on€file€in€his€office€as€may€be€required.ðð€€However,€theÏtrial€court€is€not€obligated€to€furnish€an€indigent€petitioner€a€transcript€unless€œit›€ð ðmay€beÏof€reasonable€assistance€to€the€petitioner€in€establishing€his€right€to€the€relief€sought.ðð€ÏòòDotson€v.€Stateóó,€477€S.W.2d€763,€64€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€œ1971).€€Obviously,›€once€theÍtrial€court€assumed€the€truth€of€the€only€fact€that€the€petitioner€sought€to€prove€with€theÏœtranscript,€in€the€present€case,›€the€transcript€was€not€needed.ÌÌà àIn€the€context€of€this€case,€the€trial€courtððs€failure€to€advise€the€petitionerÏthat€he€could€be€resentenced€for€violating€the€terms€of€the€community€correctionsÏprogram€does€not€rise€to€the€level€of€constitutional€error€that€would€entitle€the€petitionerÏto€post„conviction€relief.€€As€previously€noted,€the€petitionerððs€testimony€establishedÏthat€he€understood€that€he€was€receiving€an€effective€ten„year€community€correctionsÏsentence.€€The€presentence€report€and€the€restitution€agreement€the€petitioner€signedÏexplicitly€warned€the€petitioner€that€he€could€be€incarcerated€if€he€failed€to€comply€withÏthe€terms€of€his€sentence.€€Although€the€petitioner€sought€a€copy€of€his€guilty€pleaÏsubmission€transcript€to€prove€that€he€was€not€advised€of€the€potential€for€resentencingÏunder€the€Community€Corrections€Act,€it€is€significant€that€his€resentencing€was€for€theÏsame€term€of€years.€€Moreover,€he€never€claimed€that€he€would€not€have€pled€guilty€ifÏhe€had€been€advised€of€the€potential€for€resentencing€upon€revocation.€€We€agree€withÏthe€trial€courtððs€assessment€that€the€petitioner€entered€a€knowing€and€voluntary€pleaÏeven€if€the€trial€court€failed€to€advise€him€that€he€could€be€resentenced€under€theÏCommunity€Corrections€Act.€€Thus,€the€trial€court€was€justified€in€denying€theÏpetitionerððs€request€for€a€transcript€of€the€plea€submission€hearing.ÌÌà àIn€consideration€of€the€foregoing€and€the€record€as€a€whole,€the€judgmentÏof€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.ÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà àòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌà àà àà àà àà àà àJoseph€M.€Tipton,€Judge€€ÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌPaul€G.€Summers,€JudgeÌÌòòÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌDavid€H.€Welles,€Judgeà à