ÿWPC×( …U .V %„bŠŽn­žK 0 (SU:{w@µ4õ 0J 0™S 0Dì U:0 0Tj 0^¾ 0h 0r„ 0|ö 0†r 0ø 1uˆ 0dý BaU *~B)¨DCÑ AMa D3xf«? 0@PÄàTè4qv~vÓ ! 0TÞ& AO2'Æ' 0DG( D/‹( Bº(<þ6X9`(CourierX ù3|x9«<þ6X9`(CourierXôxþ6X@ɹ`7ûX@($¡¡, øð AZ"Arial Regular %g&d'g(g)g*d+v,*e-e.Ó€Úƒç"2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô(I(2”$¤¤Ý ƒ !ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XˆKXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó, øð AZ"Arial Regular2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ d< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d&&&&7Border 1dd€-'Cþÿ << Gÿÿ Ý ƒ !ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÔ€%ÔÔ€%ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€%XÔÌÌò òJuly€25,€1997ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€%ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó""""'ÿÿdxd \Ñ\R AØ'\Ñ 5Ý ƒ !ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÔ€%Ôà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€appellant's€alleged€failure€to€notify€her€probation€officer€of€a€changeÏof€address€was€not€alleged€in€the€warrant.Ì("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò ºÝ ƒ !ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÔ€%Ôà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€record€is€devoid€of€proof€of€any€substance€abuse€problem€otherÏthan€the€fact€that€the€appellant€had€been€convicted€of€sale€of€cocaine€and€DUI.€ÏThe€issue€of€the€appellant's€"problems€with€drugs€and€alcohol"€is€raised€only€inÏthe€appellant's€brief.Ì ÖÝ ƒ !ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÔ€%Ôà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝParticularly,€we€note€that€the€appellant's€medical€excuse€from€herÏtreating€physician€excused€her€from€work€for€four€to€six€months€from€March€10,Ï1995.€€The€revocation€hearing€was€held€on€March€22,€1996.€€TheÏuncontradicted€evidence€at€that€time€was€that€the€appellant€had€neitherÏperformed€any€of€her€community€service€requirement€nor€paid€her€probationÏfees.€€She€furnished€the€court€with€no€additional€medical€documentation€andÏprovided€no€excuse€for€her€behavior€other€than€that€she€had€been€unable€toÏwork€at€the€time€of€the€previous€revocation€hearing€because€she€hadÏundergone€three€surgeries.€€Additionally,€the€appellant€did€not€contradict€theÏprobation€officer's€testimony€that€she€"has€to€be€begged€to€come€in€to€report"Ïand€shows€up€only€when€warned€of€her€last€chance€to€report.Ì ÞÝ ƒ !ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÔ€%Ôà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€court€announced€at€the€conclusion€of€the€hearing€it€had€"consideredÏall€the€elements€required€to€be€considered€in€the€òòStilleróó€case,€withoutÏenumeration."€€This€is€likely€a€reference€to€òòStiller€v.€Stateóó,€516€S.W.2d€617Ï(Tenn.€1974),€which€deals€with€the€defendant's€right€to€appeal€a€denial€ofÏprobation€at€the€time€of€sentencing.€€Although€òòStilleróó€is€not€controlling€of€theÏissue€that€was€before€the€lower€court,€the€court's€inapt€citation€to€that€case€isÏharmless€error.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€36(b);€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€52(a).Ì gÝ ƒ !ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÔ€%Ôà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝDue€process€requires€the€court€conducting€the€probation€revocationÏhearing€to€make€findings€of€fact.€€òòGagnon€v.€Scarpellióó,€411€U.S.€778,€93€S.€Ct.Ï1756€(1973);€òòDelpóó,€614€S.W.2d€at€397.€€In€this€case,€the€revocation€orderÏcontains€findings€of€fact€that€"the€defendant€has€been€guilty€of€violating€the€lawsÏof€this€State,€and€has€otherwise€violated€the€conditions€of€her€probation."€€WhileÏa€more€specific€enumeration€of€how€the€appellant€"otherwise€violated€theÏconditions€of€her€probation"€is€preferable,€any€arguable€deficiency€is€notÏprejudicial€to€the€appellant€in€light€of€the€specific€finding€she€violated€the€laws€ofÏthe€state,€which€itself€is€a€sufficient€ground€for€revocation.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.Ï36(b);€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€52(a);€òòseeóó€òòState€v.€Miltonóó,€673€S.W.2d€555,€557€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.€1984)€(probationer€who€was€not€prejudiced€by€proceduralÏdeficiencies€at€revocation€hearing€not€entitled€to€reversal).ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò(—8$——ÔªÔò òòòóóó óÔªÔ€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ !ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÝ  Ý›Ò  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÓ  ÓÑ\R AØ'\ÑÔ€%ÔÑ7€rXXdÈdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÞ ÞÌÌÑ€Ñò òœÙ€€ÙßR€()'A1-j|` Å `€€@ÿRß›à@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌ€à@ àAT€KNOXVILLEÌó óÌà@ àMAY€1997€SESSIONÌÌÌÌò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà àó ó)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌà àà àAppellee,à àà àà à)à àC.C.A.€No.€03C01„9608„CR„00314Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìvs.à àà àà àà àà àà à)à àKnox€Countyà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìò òYVONNE€BURNETTE,€ALIAS,ó óà àà à)à àHonorable€Ray€L.€Jenkins,ÏJudge€à àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌà àà àAppellant.à àà àà à)à à(Probation€Revocation)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à à€Ìà àà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àÌÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à àà àà àà àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:ÌÌMARK€E.€STEPHENSà àà àà àà àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPÌDistrict€Public€Defenderà àà àà àà àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÌÌPAULA€R.€VOSS€(Appeal)à àà àà àà àGEORGIA€BLYTHE€FELNERÌDAVID€GALL€(Hearing)à àà àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌAssistant€Public€Defendersà àà àà àCriminal€Justice€DivisionÌ1209€Euclid€Avenueà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌKnoxville,€TN€€37921à àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493à àÌà àÌà0 àà0 àà0 àà àà àà àà0 àRANDALL€E.€NICHOLSÌà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àLEON€FRANKSÌà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àAsst.€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà0 àà0 àP.O.€Box€1468Ìà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àKnoxville,€TN€€37901„1468ÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€____________________ÌÌÌò òAFFIRMEDó óÌÌÌCURWOOD€WITT€ÌJUDGEÌÌÌÑ€+ÑÇÑ7€rXXdðXXdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑØØÓÓÑ  ÑÑ7€ ˆK XXdðXXdð7Ñà@ àò òòòOPINIONó óóóÌà àà àThe€appellant,€Yvonne€Burnette,€appeals€the€Knox€CountyÏCriminal€Court's€revocation€of€her€probationary€sentence.€€As€a€result€of€theÏprobation€revocation,€she€is€currently€serving€her€8€year€sentence€for€sale€ofÏcocaine,€a€Class€B€felony,€in€custody€of€the€Department€of€Correction.€€In€thisÏappeal,€she€contends€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€revoking€herÏprobation.€€Having€reviewed€the€record€of€the€proceedings€below,€we€find€noÏreversible€error€and€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€lower€court.ÌÌà àà àThe€appellant€was€convicted€of€sale€of€cocaine€following€her€guiltyÏplea€on€€January€5,€1994.€€On€March€30,€1994,€she€was€given€a€sentence€of€8Ïyears€in€the€Department€of€Correction,€suspended€in€favor€of€probation.€€A€fineÏand€court€costs€were€assessed.€€On€January€31,€1995,€a€probation€violationÏwarrant€was€issued€for€the€appellant€based€on€her€alleged€failure€to€makeÏpayments€toward€her€court€costs€and€to€comply€with€community€serviceÏrequirements.€€Counsel€was€appointed.€€The€Knox€County€Criminal€CourtÏthereafter€dismissed€the€warrant,€apparently€after€the€appellant€furnished€proofÏof€a€medical€condition€excusing€her€failure€to€comply€with€the€terms€ofÏprobation.€€A€second€warrant€was€issued€on€February€15,€1996,€this€timeÏalleging€the€appellant€had€broken€several€rules€of€probation,€including€failing€toÏobey€the€law€(having€been€arrested€for€DUI,€failure€to€appear€and€criminalÏtrespass),€falsely€representing€that€she€had€not€had€any€contact€with€lawÏenforcement€officers,€failing€to€report€to€her€probation€officer€as€instructed,€usingÍintoxicants€to€excess,€and€failing€to€pay€probation€fees.€€Counsel€wasÏappointed,€and€the€matter€came€on€for€hearing€on€March€22,€1996.ÌÌà àà àAt€the€probation€revocation€hearing,€the€state€presented€evidenceÏof€DUI€and€criminal€trespass€convictions€the€appellant€received€since€beginningÏher€probationary€term,€her€failure€to€report€multiple€new€criminal€charges€sinceÏbeing€placed€on€probation,€her€false€statements€that€she€had€not€had€contactÏwith€law€enforcement€officers,€the€difficulties€the€probation€officers€had€in€gettingÏher€to€report€twice€a€month,€her€failure€to€pay€the€funds€owed,€and€her€failure€toÏreport€a€change€of€address.× ƒ, ××  ×€€The€appellant€admitted€she€had€violated€the€termsÏof€her€probation€by€committing€other€crimes;€however,€she€generally€denied€theÏother€allegations.€€She€testified€she€did€not€understand€she€had€to€report€anyÏsubsequent€charges€unless€she€ultimately€received€a€conviction,€she€was€neverÏtold€she€had€to€report€to€her€probation€officer€more€than€once€a€month,€she€hadÏnot€moved€from€the€address€given€the€probation€officer,€and€she€had€beenÏunable€to€pay€court€costs€because€she€had€undergone€surgery.€€The€appellantÏacknowledged€she€had€not€complied€with€all€of€the€terms€of€probation€andÏasked€the€court€for€a€second€chance.€The€trial€court€revoked€probation,Ïreasoning,€"There€is€a€point€at€which€the€patience€and€understanding€of€the€trialÏcourt€is€exhausted,€and€we've€reached€it€in€this€case.€€Let€the€probation€beÏrevoked,€required€to€serve€the€complete€sentence."ÌÌà àà àIn€her€appeal,€the€appellant€pleads€for€a€second€chance€at€a€non„incarcerative€sentence€due€to€her€family€obligations€and€substance€abuseÏproblems,× ƒ. ××  ×€notwithstanding€her€admitted€violation€of€the€terms€of€probation.€€InÏthat€vein,€she€urges€us€to€consider€the€objectives€of€the€Criminal€Code€and€theÏSentencing€Act€and€impose€a€measure€less€severe€than€incarceration,€such€asÏmore€stringent€terms€of€probation.€€ÌÌà àà àThe€standard€of€review€upon€appeal€of€an€order€revokingÏprobation€is€the€abuse€of€discretion€standard.€€òòState€v.€Harkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€79,Ï82€(Tenn.€1991).€€In€order€for€an€abuse€of€discretion€to€occur,€the€reviewingÏcourt€must€find€that€the€record€contains€no€substantial€evidence€sufficient€toÏsupport€the€conclusion€of€the€trial€judge€that€the€violation€of€the€terms€ofÏprobation€has€occurred.€€òòHarkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€at€82;€òòState€v.€Delpóó,€614€S.W.2dÏ395,€398€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1980).€€The€trial€court€is€required€only€to€find€that€theÏviolation€of€probation€occurred€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence.€€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„311(d)€(Supp.€1996).€€ÌUpon€a€finding€of€a€violation,€the€trial€court€is€vested€with€the€statutory€authorityÏto€"revoke€probation€and€suspension€of€sentence€and€cause€the€defendant€toÏcommence€the€execution€of€the€judgment€as€originally€entered."€Tenn.€CodeÍAnn.€ðð€40„35„311(d)€(Supp.€1996).€Furthermore,€when€probation€is€revoked,Ïð ðthe€original€judgment€so€rendered€by€the€trial€judge€shall€be€in€full€force€andÏeffect€from€the€date€of€the€revocation€of€such€suspension."€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÏ40„35„310€(1990).€The€trial€judge€retains€the€discretionary€authority€to€order€theÏdefendant€to€serve€the€original€sentence.€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Dukeóó,€902€S.W.2d€424,Ï427€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€ÌÓ  ÓÌà àà àThe€defendant€admitted€violation€of€the€terms€of€probation.€€This€isÏsubstantial€evidence€of€record€to€support€the€trial€court's€revocation€order.€€òòSeeóóÏòòState€v.€Michael€Emleróó,€No.€01C01„9512„CC„00424,€slip€op.€at€4€(Tenn.€Crim.ÏApp.,€Nashville,€Nov.€27,€1996)€(where€the€defendant€admits€violation€of€theÏterms€of€probation,€revocation€by€the€trial€court€is€not€arbitrary€or€capricious);Ïòòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Mitzi€Ann€Boydóó,€No.€03C01„9508„CC„00246,€slip€op.€at€3Ï(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€Nov.€1,€1996).€The€lower€court€was€statutorilyÏauthorized€to€impose€the€original€sentence€upon€revocation€of€probation.€€òòSeeóóÏTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„310€(1990).€€Contrary€to€the€appellant's€assertion,€weÏare€not€required€at€this€stage€to€reconsider€the€sentencing€principles.€€òòState€v.ÏHoward€Luroy€Williamson,€Jr.óó,€No.€02C01„9507„CC„00201,€slip€op.€at€4€(Tenn.ÏCrim€App.,€Jackson,€Sept.€30,€1996)€(citation€omitted).€€We€note€that€theÏappellant€has€made€minimal€efforts,€at€best,€to€comply€with€the€terms€ofÏprobation€and€rehabilitate€herself.€€Based€on€her€track€record,€she€gave€the€trialÍcourt€no€reason€to€believe€her€performance€would€improve.× ƒ/ ××  ×€€We€cannot€say€theÏtrial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€ordering€the€appellant€to€serve€the€terms€ofÏher€original€sentence,€that€is,€eight€years€in€the€Department€of€Correction.ÌÌà àà àIn€reaching€this€conclusion,€we€do€not€disregard€the€appellant'sÏarguments€that€the€lower€court€relied€on€inappropriate€authority€as€the€basis€forÏrevoking€probation× ƒ0 ××  ×€and€failed€to€make€findings€of€fact€on€the€record.× ƒ1 ××  ×€€ThoseÍissues€are€not€dispositive€of€this€appeal.ÌÌà àà àThe€judgment€of€the€lower€court€is€affirmed.ÌÌÇÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà à_______________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àCURWOOD€WITT,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌÌ_______________________________ÌJOSEPH€B.€JONES,€PRESIDING€JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌ_______________________________ÌJOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€JUDGEÌÌà àà àà àà à