ÿWPCü kttr¯¿·ÂÀ9^iÆÅü]ú4Þº$šÅUj¯€isÙ0ÂÀïòü‚èÙÐmêñšW9ÞcE‹Ú7ÿ_  [ìÙIøFèJ5´sî i¢@À¨I6\$Íð•µ_JpN9[G4i”„pïL¹„ÅÒühâP6Ôt,¡ ¹§ú–‚ýØÉFè;²U.V¿|Îó0è4UÙíHp žRå9â‡ÏÒ^åW$òtF¨n]i&Ì(¥‰‹dïã$WÈÐ:ïýÛU= 0wCkÜ¿<;Ý8Æ„•™4þ~µvzG<¡!QfnÂÖ¯´ckvF0„c<û4¦Tð|5ãã¹ÿø¹þl­Í4'íßݘ¹ Sˆ”HÀ"ÏGt–ö€hÈÎX†a "°zwÏÅ¬Ñ ³†s‘ö{ÝjgÅÅsd²0@©z((‘Q( ¹,äç8O=NÖ \WÓÂ}ày†%§=Š÷ŸVº¹&7k†ú4‚o$ÇEªnÞ.Æç™Bqq2 X¨e£lKŒ‰&ɤèB¿–z"9vR^¤¶YÊP"eßè6쌪m½À×S(Å¡fÉq´r£Í[”µ z[{šŠÎ©?.pî‹ÄOÚ2àVò”1ÚÊ…#!F %g UNm 0Æ»  4‰  U:¬ 0&æ w@ U:L 0D†"ÊU>ìˆ*U:²Nìî mððððU: BAAAAAA D3^^^ 0â‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 0âssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss AQUƦ¦ 0Dl D/° BߘHP LaserJet 8000 DN PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0X(ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman Regular(žjÆ$¡¡Ñ` ` ÑÑÜÜÑÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal[  AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ LegalTÑÓÓ{Z='3|xŸ, øð AZ"Arial Regular(Ö(2Zˆ$¤¤Ý ƒjÆ!ÝÑ` °ÑÑܰÑÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÓÓÝ  ÝÒ44ÒÒXXÒà Œ àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó –—E˜™šD›œQežUŸÓ€,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó Ô€X¹XXXÔÔ€îaùîXX¹ÔÓ  ÓÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€‹ŒîîaùÔÐ  ÐÌò òSeptember€9,€1999Ð ¸¸ ÐÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ô³Ëõ‹ŒÔAppellate€CourtÐ ˜˜ ÐClerkó ó<@ˆÐ9Z &Courier Regular ~Ý ƒ J$ÝÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÓÓÒ44ÒÒXXÒà Œ àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÓÓÔ€X#ªXXXÔÔ‡ò¨‹òXX#ªÔÔ‡ò¨‹òòò¨‹ÔThe€first€four€criteria€are€found€in€òòGrayóó.€€A€fifth€category€in€òòGrayóó,€based€on€a€specific€numberÐ `  Ðof€prior€felony€convictions,€may€enhance€the€sentence€range€but€is€no€longer€a€listed€criterion.€€òòSeeóóÐ  ¾ ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115,€Sentencing€Commission€Comments.Ô#†ò¨‹òòò¨‹Ý#ÔÔ‡òa‚òòò¨‹Ô,c½¬AZ‹"Arial RegularÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular d$$$$'ÿÿdxd(º3Û7$££Ý ƒjÆ!ÝÑ` °ÑÑܰÑÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÓÓÝ  Ý(º3Û7$¢¢Ý ƒjÆ!ÝÑ` °ÑÑܰÑÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÓÓÝ  Ý€_-‚*Cþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒjÆ!ÝÑ` °ÑÑܰÑÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÓÓÝ  Ýññ›ññÑ8€w$XdìdÈ8ÑÑ  ÑÔ€ X¹XXXÔñŸñßr€ *<,(j 8 `€€@Ehf tt0( ` ¨ÞrßñŸñÔ_Ôà@g g ÚàòòIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEóóˆÐ `  Ðà@*ÚàòòAT€KNOXVILLEóóˆÐ , Ì Ðà@(ÚàJULY€1999€SESSIONˆÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à ” àà ì à*à D àC.C.A.€#€03C01„9811„CR„00401€€Ð 0 Ðà Œ àAppellee,à < àà ” àà ì à*à D àSULLIVAN€COUNTYÐ \ü  ÐVS.à Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì à*à D àHon.€Phyllis€H.€Miller,€JudgeÐ (È  ÐÓÓKYLE€ROBERT€BALL,à ” àà ì à*à D à(Aggravated€Burglary€and€Ð ô”  ÐÌà Œ àAppellant.à < àà ” àà ì à*à D àTheft€Under€$500.00)€Ð À` ÐÌÌÌÌÌòòFor€Appellantóó:à < àà ” àà ì àà D àòòFor€Appelleeóó:Ð $Ä ÐÌJulie€A.€Rice,€Attorney€à ” àà ì àà D àPaul€G.€Summers€Ð ð ÐP.O.€Box€426à < àà ” àà ì àà D àAttorney€General€and€ReporterÐ Öv ÐKnoxville,€TN€€37901„0426€à ì àÐ ¼ \ Ð(on€appeal)à ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àMarvin€S.€Blair,€Jr.à L àà ¤ àÐ ¢!B Ðà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌRichard€A.€Tateà < àà ” àà ì àà D àCriminal€Justice€DivisionÐ n# ÐAssistant€Public€Defenderà ” àà ì àà D à425€Fifth€Avenue€North€Ð T$ô ÐSecond€Judicial€Districtà ” àà ì àà D àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493Ð :%Ú ÐP.O.€Box€889ÌBlountville,€TN€€37617à ” àà ì àà D àBarry€P.€Staubus€Ð '¦! Ð(at€trial)à ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÐ ì'Œ" Ðà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àP.O.€Box€526Ìà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àBlountville,€TN€€37617ÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:__________________________ÌÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌÌÌGARY€R.€WADE,€PRESIDING€JUDGEÐ  L6ì,2 ÐÓÓà@33-ÚàòòOPINIONóóˆÐ `  Ðà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant,€Robert€Kyle€Ball,€was€convicted€of€aggravated€burglaryÏand€one€count€of€theft€under€$500.00.€€The€trial€court€imposed€a€Range€II€sentenceÏof€ten€years€on€the€aggravated€burglary€and€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€forÏthe€misdemeanor€theft.€€Fines€imposed€totaled€$2,000.00.€€The€sentences€are€to€beÏserved€consecutively€to€each€other€and€consecutive€to€a€prior€sentence€for€whichÏparole€had€been€revoked.ÌÌà Œ àà ä àIn€this€appeal€of€right,€the€defendant€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€theÏevidence€and€contends€that€the€sentence€is€excessive.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€ofÏthe€trial€court.ÌÌà Œ àà ä àOn€the€evening€of€July€4,€1997,€there€was€a€break„in€at€the€KingsportÏapartment€of€the€victim,€Dexter€ññœññCarl€Morelock,ññ›ññññññ€Jr.,€during€which€an€AMT€Mark€ññœññIIIññ›ññññññ€.30Ïcaliber€carbine€pistol,€a€reloading€die,€and€two€boxes€of€.30€caliber€ammunition€wereÏstolen€from€a€bedroom€closet.€€Earlier€that€afternoon,€between€6:00€and€6:30€P.M.,Ïthe€defendant,€who€"was€drinking€pretty€heavily,"€stopped€as€he€drove€his€vehicle€byÏthe€apartment€of€the€victim.€€The€victim,€who€was€standing€in€the€front€yard,€had€justÏreturned€from€a€shooting€practice€range€and€had€in€his€possession€the€AMT€pistol.€ÏThe€weapon€was€unusual€because€it€fired€rifle€cartridges.€€The€victim,€who€hadÏknown€the€defendant€for€fifteen€or€twenty€years,€had€not€seen€him€for€two€or€threeÏyears€prior€to€the€meeting€at€the€apartment.€€When€the€defendant€saw€the€pistol,€heÏasked€the€victim€if€he€would€sell€it,€to€which€the€victim€replied,€"No,€sir."€€TheÏdefendant€then€asked€permission€to€use€the€victim's€bathroom€and€did€so,€afterÏwhich€the€victim€invited€the€defendant€to€a€July€Fourth€picnic€at€his€wife's€mother'sÏresidence.€€During€the€time€before€the€victim€and€his€wife€left€to€go€to€the€picnic,€theÏdefendant€persisted€in€his€effort€to€purchase€the€pistol.€€Although€the€victim€agreedÐ 8¸.4 Ðto€purchase€a€television€from€the€defendant€for€$75.00,€the€victim€was€adamant€thatÏthe€pistol€was€not€for€sale.€€By€then,€the€victim€had€placed€the€pistol,€a€reloading€die,Ïand€two€boxes€of€ammunition€in€a€bedroom€closet.€€The€defendant€again€asked€forÏand€received€permission€to€use€the€restroom.€€When€he€did€not€return€for€severalÏminutes,€the€victim€looked€for€the€defendant€and€discovered€him€coming€out€of€theÏbedroom€where€the€pistol€was€stored.€€At€that€point,€the€victim€directed€theÏdefendant€to€leave€the€bedroom€whereupon€both€men€left€the€apartment€to€attend€aÏpicnic.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant€stayed€at€the€picnic€for€only€a€short€period€of€time.€ÏLater,€when€the€victim€discovered€that€he€had€forgotten€fireworks€he€had€intended€toÏdisplay,€he€returned€to€his€apartment.€€As€he€approached€the€apartment€building,€heÏsaw€a€vehicle€which€resembled€that€of€the€defendant.€€When€he€walked€to€the€backÏdoor€of€his€unit,€he€found€that€the€door€was€ajar.€€The€outside€light€had€been€turnedÏoff€and€a€stone€had€been€used€to€break€the€glass.€€When€the€victim€checked€theÏinside€of€his€apartment,€he€discovered€that€ññœññonly€hisññ›ññññññ€pistol,€the€ammunition,€and€theÏreloading€die€were€missing.€€Several€other€guns,€which€were€also€stored€inside€theÏapartment,€had€not€been€stolen.ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€victim€reported€the€crime€to€the€Sullivan€County€Sheriff'sÏDepartment€and€Officer€Joe€Delp€ññœññinvestigated.ññ›ññññññ€€On€the€following€Monday,€the€victimÏand€his€wife€ññœññdrove€throughout€Kingsport€lookingññ›ññññññ€for€the€ññœññdefendant.€€When€they€sawÏhim€walkingññ›ññññññ€along€Center€ññœññStreet,€theññ›ññññññ€defendant€ññœññranññ›ññññññ€but€ññœññthe€victim€caughtññ›ññññññ€up€with€himÏin€his€car.€€According€to€the€victim,€the€defendant€immediately€apologized€forÏstealing€the€pistol€and€offered€$600.00€in€restitution.€€When€the€victim€stated€that€heÏwould€rather€have€the€gun,€the€defendant€remarked€that€he€did€know€whether€heÏcould€get€it€back.€€The€defendant€never€returned€the€gun€and€never€compensatedÐ 8¸.4 Ðthe€victim€for€his€loss.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant€did€not€testify€and€offered€no€proof€at€the€trial.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àInitially,€the€defendant€claims€that€the€state€failed€to€prove€beyond€aÏreasonable€doubt€that€he€burglarized€the€apartment€or€that€he€took€the€items€withÏthe€intent€to€deprive€the€owner€ññœññthereof,ññ›ññññññ€as€required€by€the€ññœññtheft€statute.ññ›ññññññ€€TheÏdefendant€contends€that€the€evidence€did€not€exclude€the€possibility€of€anotherÏhaving€burglarized€the€apartment€and€having€taken€the€pistol,€the€ammunition,€andÏthe€reloading€die.€€He€argues€that€the€failure€on€the€part€of€the€victim€to€identify€theÏdefendant€as€a€suspect€when€the€matter€was€ññœññfirst€reportedññ›ññññññ€to€the€police€supports€hisÏargument€that€the€evidence€is€insufficient.€€The€defendant€submits€that€the€victimÏwas€motivated€to€lie€by€the€lack€of€insurance€coverage€for€the€items€stolen€and€hisÏdesire€to€identify€a€suspect€with€a€prior€criminal€record€in€order€to€extort€aÏsettlement.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àOn€appeal,€the€state€is€entitled€to€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€theÏevidence€and€all€reasonable€inferences€which€might€be€drawn€therefrom.€€òòState€v.Ð ì'Œ" ÐCabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832€(Tenn.€1978).€€When€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€isÐ ¸)X $ Ðchallenged,€the€relevant€question€is€whether,€after€a€review€in€the€light€mostÏfavorable€to€the€state,€any€rational€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€the€essentialÏelements€of€the€crime€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòState€v.€Williamsóó,€657€S.W.2dÐ /¼%* Ð405€(Tenn.€1983);€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(e).€€This€court€may€neither€reweigh€norÏreevaluate€the€evidence.€€Nor€may€a€court€substitute€its€inferences€for€those€drawnÏby€the€trier€of€fact.€€òòLikas€v.€Stateóó,€286€S.W.2d€856€(Tenn.€1956).Ð €4 +0 ÐÌà Œ àà ä àTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„14„402€provides€that€a€"person€commitsÐ 8¸.4 Ðburglary€who,€without€the€effective€consent€of€the€property€owner€...€(3)€[e]nters€aÏbuilding€and€commits€or€attempts€to€commit€a€felony,€theft€or€assault€....€€TheÏoffense€is€aggravated€when€the€burglary€is€committed€in€a€place€of€"habitation."€ÏTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€ññœññ39„14„401ññ›ññññññññœññññ›ññññññññœññ€to€„403.€€ññ›ññññññÌÌà Œ àà ä àA€misdemeanor€theft€is€committed€when€the€value€of€the€property€isÏ$500.00€or€less€if€the€perpetrator€"with€the€intent€to€deprive€the€owner€of€property€...Ïknowingly€obtains€or€exercises€control€over€the€property€without€the€owner'sÏeffective€consent."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€39„14„103,€„105.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àIn€this€instance,€there€was€circumstantial€evidence€that€the€defendantÏññœññenteredññ›ññ€the€apartment€of€the€victim€without€his€consent€and€for€the€purpose€ofÏcommitting€a€theft.€€Here,€of€course,€the€jury€was€entitled€to€accredit€the€testimonyÏoffered€by€the€witnesses€of€the€state€and€reject€the€defense€theory.€€The€recordÏshows€that€the€state€offered€proof€against€the€defendant€of€each€of€the€elements€ofÏtheft:€€(1)€an€intent€to€deprive€the€owner€of€the€property;€(2)€knowingly€obtainingÏcontrol€of€the€property;€and€(3)€a€failure€to€gain€the€consent€of€the€owner.€€It€was€theÏjury's€prerogative€to€accept€the€testimony€of€the€victim€who€claimed€that€theÏdefendant€acknowledged€having€stolen€and€then€having€sold€the€pistol.€€Certainly,Ïthe€accompanying€circumstances€proved€by€the€state€at€trial€ññœññtendññ›ññññññ€to€corroborate€theÏclaim.€ññœññññ›ññññññÌÌà Œ àà ä àNext,€the€defendant€complains€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€imposingÏthe€maximum€sentence€possible€for€aggravated€burglary€and€by€ordering€theÏsentences€to€be€served€consecutively.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àÔ‡X#ªXX X#ªÔWhen€there€is€a€challenge€to€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€ofÐ 8¸.4 Ða€sentence,€it€is€the€duty€of€this€court€to€conduct€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€with€aÐ `  Ðpresumption€that€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€This€presumption€is€"conditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showingÏin€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevantÏfacts€and€circumstances."€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991);€òòseeóóÐ 0 ÐòòState€v.€Jonesóó,€883€S.W.2d€597€(Tenn.€1994).€€"If€the€trial€court€appliesÐ \ü  Ðinappropriate€factors€or€otherwise€fails€to€follow€the€1989€Sentencing€Act,€theÏpresumption€of€correctness€falls."€€òòState€v.€Sheltonóó,€854€S.W.2d€116,€123€(Tenn.Ð ô”  ÐCrim.€App.€1992).€€The€Sentencing€Commission€Comments€provide€that€the€burdenÏis€on€the€defendant€to€show€the€impropriety€of€the€sentence.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àOur€review€requires€an€analysis€of€(1)€the€evidence,€if€any,€received€atÏthe€trial€and€sentencing€hearing;€(2)€the€presentence€report;€(3)€the€principles€ofÏsentencing€and€the€arguments€of€counsel€relative€to€sentencing€alternatives;€(4)€theÏnature€and€characteristics€of€the€offense;€(5)€any€mitigating€or€enhancing€factors;€(6)Ïany€statements€made€by€the€defendant€in€his€own€behalf;€and€(7)€the€defendant'sÏpotential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„102,€„103,€and€œñžñÌñžñ„210;›€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€735€S.W.2d€859,€863€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).€€The€record€inÐ ì'Œ" Ðthis€case€demonstrates€that€the€trial€court€made€adequate€findings€of€fact.€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àPrior€to€the€enactment€of€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989,Ïthe€limited€classifications€for€the€imposition€of€consecutive€sentences€were€set€out€inÏòòGray€v.€Stateóó,€538€S.W.2d€391,€393€(Tenn.€1976).€€In€that€case€our€supreme€courtÐ è0ˆ', Ðruled€that€aggravating€circumstances€must€be€present€before€placement€in€any€oneÏof€the€classifications.€€Later,€in€òòState€v.€Tayloróó,€739€S.W.2d€227€(Tenn.€1987),€theÐ €4 +0 Ðcourt€established€an€additional€category€for€those€defendants€convicted€of€two€orÏmore€statutory€offenses€involving€sexual€abuse€of€minors.€€There€were,€however,Ð 8¸.4 Ðadditional€words€of€caution:€€ÌÓÓà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à[C]onsecutive€sentences€should€not€routinely€be€imposedÏ.€.€.€and€.€.€.€the€aggregate€maximum€of€consecutiveÏterms€must€be€reasonably€related€to€the€severity€of€theÏoffenses€involved.òòÓ]4ÓÐÞ ~ä Ð ä Ð  ÐTayloróó,€739€S.W.2d€at€230.€€The€Sentencing€Commission€Comments€adopted€theÐ ªJ Ðcautionary€language.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115.€€The€1989€Act€is,€in€essence,Ïthe€codification€of€the€holdings€in€òòGrayóó€and€òòTayloróó;€consecutive€sentences€may€beÐ Bâ  Ðimposed€in€the€discretion€of€the€trial€court€only€upon€a€determination€that€one€orÏmore€of€the€following€criteria׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€exist:Ð Úz  ÐÓÓà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(1)€€The€defendant€is€a€professional€criminal€who€hasÏknowingly€devoted€himself€to€criminal€acts€as€a€majorÏsource€of€livelihood;Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(2)€€The€defendant€is€an€offender€whose€record€ofÏcriminal€activity€is€extensive;Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(3)€€The€defendant€is€a€dangerous€mentally€abnormalÏperson€so€declared€by€a€competent€psychiatrist€whoÏconcludes€as€a€result€of€an€investigation€prior€toÏsentencing€that€the€defendant's€criminal€conduct€hasÏbeen€characterized€by€a€pattern€of€repetitive€orÏcompulsive€behavior€with€heedless€indifference€toÏconsequences;Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(4)€€The€defendant€is€a€dangerous€offender€whoseÏbehavior€indicates€little€or€no€regard€for€human€life,€andÏno€hesitation€about€committing€a€crime€in€which€the€riskÏto€human€life€is€high;€€€€à D à€€€€ÐÒ(r#ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(5)€€The€defendant€is€convicted€of€two€(2)€or€moreÏstatutory€offenses€involving€sexual€abuse€of€a€minor€withÏconsideration€of€the€aggravating€circumstances€arisingÏfrom€the€relationship€between€the€defendant€and€victimÏor€victims,€the€time€span€of€defendant's€undetectedÏsexual€activity,€the€nature€and€scope€of€the€sexual€actsÏand€the€extent€of€the€residual,€physical€and€mentalÏdamage€to€the€victim€or€victims;Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(6)€€The€defendant€is€sentenced€for€an€offenseÏcommitted€while€on€probation;Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÐ €4 +0 Ðà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(7)€€The€defendant€is€sentenced€for€criminal€contempt.Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌÓz7ÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(b).ÌÌà Œ àà ä àIn€òòGrayóó,€our€supreme€court€ruled€that€before€consecutive€sentencingÐ Äd Ðcould€be€imposed€upon€the€dangerous€offender,€as€now€defined€by€subsectionÏ(b)(4)€in€the€statute,€other€conditions€must€be€present:€€(a)€that€the€crimes€ññœññinvolveññ›ññññññÏaggravating€circumstances;€(b)€that€consecutive€sentences€are€a€necessary€meansÏto€protect€the€public€from€the€defendant;€and€(c)€that€the€term€reasonably€relates€toÏthe€severity€of€the€offenses.ÌÌà Œ àà ä àIn€òòState€v.€Wilkersonóó,€905€S.W.2d€933,€938€(Tenn.€1995),€our€highÐ Xø Ðcourt€reaffirmed€those€principles,€holding€that€consecutive€sentences€cannot€beÏrequired€of€the€dangerous€offender€"unless€the€terms€reasonably€relate[]€to€theÏseverity€of€the€offenses€committed€and€are€necessary€in€order€to€protect€the€publicÏ(society)€from€further€criminal€acts€by€those€persons€who€resort€to€aggravatedÏcriminal€conduct."€€The€òòWilkersonóó€decision,€which€modified€somewhat€the€strictÐ T$ô Ðfactual€guidelines€for€consecutive€sentencing€adopted€in€òòState€v.€Woodsóó,€814Ð  &À  ÐS.W.2d€378,€380€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991),€described€sentencing€as€a€"humanÏprocess€that€neither€can€nor€should€be€reduced€to€a€set€of€fixed€and€mechanicalÏrules."€€òòWilkersonóó,€905€S.W.2d€at€938.€Ð „+$"& ÐÔ#† X#ªXXX#ªÊ*#ÔÔ‡X#ªXX X#ªÔÌÔ#† X#ªXXX#ªêC#Ôà Œ àà ä àInitially,€the€defendant€concedes€that€the€trial€court,€which€found€five€Ð /¼%* Ðenhancement€factors€applicable,€properly€determined€the€presence€of€fourÏenhancement€factors€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114:€€(1)€a€previous€criminalÏhistory€of€criminal€convictions€...€in€addition€to€those€necessary€to€establish€theÏappropriate€range;€(8)€a€previous€history€of€unwillingness€to€comply€with€theÏconditions€of€a€sentence€involving€release€in€the€community;€(13)€(B)€€the€felony€wasÐ 8¸.4 Ðcommitted€while€on€...€parole;€and€(20)€that€the€defendant€was€adjudicated€to€haveÏcommitted€a€delinquent€act€as€a€juvenile€that€would€have€constituted€a€felony€ifÏcommitted€by€an€adult.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant€argues€that€he€did€not€violate€a€position€of€private€trust,Ïas€adjudged€by€the€trial€court,€€because,€in€fact,€the€victim€did€not€actually€entrustÏthe€victim€with€the€items€stolen€and€was€so€suspicious€of€his€behavior€that€he€soughtÏout€the€defendant€after€the€latter's€second€trip€to€the€restroom.€€The€defendant€alsoÏcontends€that€the€trial€court€did€not€give€sufficient€weight€to€a€mitigating€factor,€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(1),€that€"the€defendant's€criminal€conduct€neither€causedÏññœññnorññ›ññ€threatened€serious€ññœññbodily€injury."ññ›ññññññ€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àAs€a€Range€II€offender,€the€defendant€could€have€received€a€sentenceÏas€little€as€six€years€and€as€much€as€ten€years.€€The€record€demonstrates€that€theÏtrial€court€carefully€considered€each€of€the€enhancement€factors€and€expressedÏparticular€concern€about€the€defendant's€prior€criminal€history€and€his€failure,€on€aÏnumber€of€occasions,€to€comply€with€a€sentence€involving€release€into€theÏcommunity.€€Those€factors,€in€our€view,€would€warrant€an€enhanced€sentence.ÏMoreover,€there€was€a€violation€of€private€trust.€€The€defendant€and€the€victim€hadÏbeen€in€high€school€together€and€had€known€each€other€for€over€twenty€years.€€TheÏvictim€invited€the€defendant€into€his€home€based€upon€their€long€acquaintanceship,Ïconsented€to€his€use€of€the€restroom€facilities,€and€invited€him€to€attend€anÏIndependence€Day€picnic€at€his€mother„in„law's€residence.€€The€defendant,€in€ourÏview,€took€advantage€of€the€knowledge€he€had€acquired€through€the€relationshipÏboth€to€identify€the€items€he€desired€and€to€enter€the€apartment€to€commit€a€theft€atÏa€time€he€knew€the€victim€and€his€wife€would€be€absent.€€While€the€recordÏdemonstrates€that€the€trial€court€gave€little€weight€to€the€trust€factor,€this€courtÐ 8¸.4 Ðconcludes€that€there€was€sufficient€evidence€of€a€violation€of€private€trust.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àFurthermore,€the€record€shows€that€the€trial€court€did,€in€fact,€giveÏsome€weight€to€the€ññœññmitigatiñ”ñoñ”ñnñ•ñgñ•ñññ›ññññññ€factor€identified€by€the€defendant€ññœñññ–ñ(iñ–ññ—ññ–ñ/ñ–ññ—ññ˜ñ.e.,€ñ˜ññ™ñthe€absence€ofÏserious€bodily€harm)€ñ™ñbutññ›ññññññ€concluded€ññœññññœññthat€thatññ›ññññ›ññ€should€not€lessen€the€sentence€fromÏten€years.€€That,€in€our€view,€was€a€proper€exercise€of€discretion.€€The€conclusion€isÏpresumptively€correct€and€one€that€this€court€will€not€disturb.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àFinally,€the€defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€determiningÏthat€the€defendant€was€a€professional€criminal€and€by€finding€his€prior€record€ofÏññœñññšñcriminal›Ïrecord›€of›Ïñšñcriminalññ›ññññññ€activity€was€so€extensive€as€to€warrant€consecutive€sentences.€€TheÏdefendant€submits€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€concluding€that€the€public€required€aÏperiod€of€long„term€protection€from€the€defendant€and€that€the€effective€ten„year,Ïeleven€month€and€twenty„nine€day€sentence€reasonably€related€to€the€severity€of€theÏoffenses.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant's€criminal€history€included€a€number€of€felonyÏconvictions€and€spanned€over€a€period€of€thirteen€years.€€There€were€severalÏconvictions€for€automobile€burglary€and€felony€theft€and€two€prior€aggravatedÏburglaries.€€The€defendant€had€been€found€guilty€on€prior€occasions€of€vandalismÏand€escape.€€Whereas€the€evidence€did€not€support€the€trial€court's€conclusion€thatÏthe€defendant€had€"knowingly€devoted€[his]€life€to€criminal€acts€as€a€major€source€ofÏlivelihood,"€it€is€nonetheless€apparent€that€the€defendant€qualified€as€"an€offenderÏwhose€record€of€criminal€activity€is€extensive...."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40„35„¼115(B)(1)€&€(2).€€Despite€the€fact€that€the€criminal€offenses€committed€by€theÏdefendant€were,€as€argued€by€the€defendant,€"non„violent,€non„threatening€propertyÏoffenses,"€the€statute€does€not€limit€the€term€"extensive€criminal€activity"€to€purelyÐ 8¸.4 Ðviolent€crimes.€€Here,€the€ññœññdefendantñ›ñ'sñ›ñññ›ññññññ€record€was€clearly€extensive.€€ññœñññœñIn€that€regard,Ïhe€qualified€for€a€consecutive€sentence.€€ñœñInññ›ññññññ€our€view,€the€trial€court€acted€within€itsÏdiscretion€when€it€determined€that€the€aggregate€sentence€imposed€fit€the€entirety€ofÏthe€circumstances.€€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àAccordingly,€the€judgment€is€affirmed.€ÌÌÓÓà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D à________________________________Ìà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àGary€R.€Wade,€Presiding€Judge€ÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌDavid€H.€Welles,€JudgeÌÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌJoe€G.€Riley,€Judge€