ÿWPCä ¬QDµŒ.¯4åäÇCarùPi º×÷¡"ç¡® ³I‡¤b˜r=º4’×°«?öêÀhVá2±8>ÿ¥­Ö3kN‡Bó6_`â5ÇQ툰òº-{ñQ,j*ÿùµ_p¤‚ñb0F¤IGøä?füL_É|Öò \~³O0ç~ÿuØ¿_¿ØeR*Klênª¶ã Šså(7’¯HþÌœ.íûmØÉ瀣GƒG{ \®ê8σäÌÔÚO®ÇèÎ>œù¢§¦G>±9ïn ðR¼xÑ®ÌJÔ·™ñLÖ1/rõ¸LïÄÕ~@'· ¦nóXŽ=õÂ\…*G+›ÑùYŸÂo¢Yת£ Í\÷üQWwf¶wjž~¯›•I.n”FµBÖÿ)Ö€u)_QÞò 5M)ú|éžÔÔÚjm6MÇ÷ê0é·´w(Ûɰ–›s¤ÑWŠMªT&––üp:ähqcßµ£D¢¹Z&l±kŸ÷äÙ°‹‘ôcöçÎ³Š‚sù…ã¶ã®ñùa¤òLæCäòljÊ÷…nô¯)Ö8T7 ãä‚ò“ö§<8) i…5‹är÷{¯Ø.CÿiÅ”ÚĘ:”LÌ”0ËþõEÉlRî|ž®~²) %>U:D 0(~UN¦ÓôU:Ç  w 4- A mC Z 0li 0DÕ B 6 U:8 r z z z z z z z z z z z z AQ‚ ÆÓ 0D™ 0DÝ 0D!! D/ee B” D3±X, øð AZ‹"Arial Regular($¡¡(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman Regular ÉÒ°ÒÓ  ÓÝ ƒ üÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝSpecifically,€the€trial€court€pronounced€from€the€bench€the€following:€€ð ðCount€one,Ð ° Ða€two€year€sentence.€€Count€two,€a€three€year€sentence.€€Count€four,€a€two€year€sentence.€ÏCount€five,€a€two€year€sentence.€€Count€six,€a€two€year€sentence€.€.€.€.€€Count€seven€is€a€nolleÏ.€.€.€.€€Count€eight€is€a€two€year€sentence.€€Count€nine€is€a€two€year€sentence.€€Count€ten€is€aÏone€year€sentence.€€Those€cases€shall€all€run€consecutive,€which€will€mean€an€aggregateÏsentence€of€eighteen€years€in€the€Department€of€Corrections.€€The€balance€of€the€sentencesÏshall€run€concurrently€in€this€case.ðð€€When€added,€these€sentences€total€only€sixteen€years.€ÏThe€judgment€form€for€count€three,€unmentioned€by€the€judge€in€his€oral€ruling,€reflects€aÏtwo€year€consecutive€sentence,€bringing€the€total€to€eighteen€years.€€However,€whileÏdefendant's€plea€agreement€for€count€four€reflects€a€two€year€sentence€as€recited€by€the€judge,Ïthe€judgment€form€for€count€four€indicates€a€three€year€consecutive€sentence.€€Thus,€the€totalÏeffective€sentence€according€to€the€judgment€forms€for€counts€one€through€ten€is€nineteenÏyears.€, øð AZ"Arial Regular Ò°ÒÓ  ÓÝ ƒ üÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝAlthough€not€challenged€by€defendant,€we€also€find€correct€the€trial€court's€rulingÐ ° Ðthat€defendant€is€an€offender€whose€record€of€criminal€activity€is€extensive.Ó€ n~<$ôddÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ3|x ((3úÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóüÿP Pd øÝ ƒ!¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€X äXXXÔÔ€úXX äÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X äXúÔÐ  ÐÌJuly€22,€1999ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó,–ûyAZ‹"Arial Regular  !"#%Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó'÷ÿ dxd d'''''ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÔ€X äXXXÔÓ  ÓÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7€'¬XXdædÈ7ÑÑ  Ññ ñññßr€(<,(j 8` `€€@Eȱ` ttx0°ð árßñññ ññ ñßt€(>.*jxû×ü` `€€@Eð` ttx0û°ð àtßñ ñà@ àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÌÌà@ŽŽ(àAT€JACKSONˆÌÌà@dd%àMAY€1999€SESSIONˆÌÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,ó óà@÷÷-à)ˆÐ à 0 Ðà@÷÷-à)ˆà p àò òNO.€¢02C01£„9901„CC„00020ó óÐ Æ   Ðà ` àAppellee,à@÷÷-à)ˆÐ ¬ ü  Ðà@÷÷-à)ˆà p àò òDECATUR€COUNTYó óÐ ’â  Ðò ò¢VS£.ó óà@÷÷-à)ˆÐ xÈ  Ðà@÷÷-à)ˆà p àò òHON.€C.€CREED€¢MCGINLEY£,Ð ^®  ÐJOE€FRANK€BOYD,ó óà@÷÷-à)ˆà p àò òJUDGEó óÐ D”  Ðà@÷÷-à)ˆÌà ` àAppellant.à@÷÷-à)ˆà p à(Sentencing)Ð ` ÐÌÌÌÒ(ä „¸ @(#(#(Òò òòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:Ð ¨ø ÐÌ¢CARTHEL£€L.€SMITH,€JR.Ìó ó85€East€Church€St.Ð Zª ÐLexington,€TN€€€38351Ð @ Ðò òòòFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:Ð ¨ø ÐÌPAUL€G.€SUMMERSó óÐ tÄ ÐAttorney€General€and€ReporterÌÌò òR.€STEPHEN€¢JOBE£ó óÐ &v ÐAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌ¢Cordell£€Hull€Building,€2nd€FloorÌ425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÌNashville,€TN€€37243„0493ÌÌò òROBERT€("GUS")€¢RADFORD£ó óÐ Š Ú# ÐDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌò òJERRY€W.€WALLACEó óÐ <#Œ& ÐAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌP.O.€Box€637ÌParsons,€TN€€€38363Ð î%>!) ÐÒ(ä „¸ @ìì(ÒÌÌÌÌÌÌò òOPINION€FILED:€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ -n(/ ÐÌÌÌAFFIRMED;€REMANDEDÌFOR€ENTRY€OF€PROPER€JUDGMENTSÌÌÌÌJOE€G.€RILEY,ÌJUDGEÐ  6j19ÿ Ðó óÌà@ÉÉ'àò òòòO€P€I€N€I€O€NˆÐ –æ Ðóóó óÌÌÓÓà ` àDefendant,€Joe€Frank€Boyd,€pled€guilty€to€one€hundred€forty„one€counts€ofÏClass€C,€D€and€E€thefts.€€Sentences€for€each€offense€were€agreed€upon€inÏdefendant's€plea€agreement.€€However,€the€manner€of€service€and€theÏconsecutive/concurrent€nature€of€service€were€left€to€the€trial€court.€€After€a€hearing,Ïthe€trial€court€ordered€partial€consecutive€sentencing€for€an€effective€sentence€ofÏeighteen€years.€€In€this€appeal€as€of€right,€defendant€challenges€the€trial€court'sÏimposition€of€consecutive€sentencing.€€Upon€our€review€of€the€record,€we€ò òAFFIRMó óÐ ` Ðthe€trial€court's€decision€to€impose€partial€consecutive€sentencing.€€However,Ïbecause€the€record€contains€discrepancies€as€to€the€actual€number€of€yearsÏdefendant€was€ordered€to€serve,€we€must€ò òREMANDó ó€this€matter€for€entry€of€properÐ tÄ Ðjudgments.€€ÌÌà@ËË+àò òòòFACTSˆÐ Ø( Ðóóó óÌà ` àDefendant€owned€Boyd€Funeral€Home.€€During€the€years€1988€through€1997,Ïdefendant€sold€"pre„need"€funeral€contracts€to€numerous€people.€€The€funds€heÏreceived€for€these€contracts€were€required€to€be€held€in€a€trust€account.€€However,Ïdefendant€converted€over€$670,000€of€these€funds€to€his€own€use.€€He€testified€thatÏhe€used€most€of€the€converted€funds€in€his€funeral€home€business.€€He€spentÏapproximately€$111,000€on€medical€expenses€for€his€child.ÌÌà ` àThe€proof€established€that€defendant€had€been€untruthful€to€a€stateÏinvestigator€on€numerous€occasions.€€As€a€result,€he€was€able€to€continue€hisÏconversion€scheme€for€several€more€years.€€The€proof€also€established€thatÏdefendant€sold€these€contracts€even€while€not€licensed€to€do€so,€and€that€he€forgedÏtrust€account€documents.€€ÌÌÐ Ì84: Ðà ` àIn€sentencing€defendant,€the€trial€court€noted€that€there€had€never€been€aÏcrime€in€Decatur€County€which€directly€affected€so€many€people.€€The€judgeÏdescribed€defendant's€activities€as€"pervasive,"€"far€reaching,"€and€"traumatic."€€TheÏtrial€judge€further€stated:ÌÓÓà ` àà8 ¸ àIn€this€case€the€evidence€is€quite€strong€that€the€defendant€inÏthis€case€derived€if€not€all€of€his€income€certainly€a€majority€ofÏit€from€his€predatory€acts€on€members€of€the€public€here€inÏDecatur€County.€€He€„„€his€own€accounting€showed€thatÏaccording€to€his€figures€that€he€lost€money€through€his€funeralÏbusiness€and€that€he€supported€himself€wholly€and€solely€onÏthe€funds€that€he€stole€from€these€people.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà ` àà ¸ à.€.€.€ÌÌà ` àà8 ¸ àAs€I€have€indicated,€the€Court€finds€that€essentially€this€personÏis€a€thief,€he's€a€liar€or€a€prevaricator€or€teller€of€falsehoods,Ïhowever€one€wants€to€classify€it.€€He's€a€predator€that€hasÏvictimized€the€elderly,€the€poor€of€this€county.€€And€he€hasÏengaged€in€a€sustained€pattern€of€criminal€activities€over€a€longÏperiod€of€time€and€he€has€in€fact€relied€upon€those€activities€asÏhis€major€source€of€livelihood.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà ` àà ¸ à.€.€.€Ìà ` àÌà ` àà8 ¸ àThe€Court€finds€that€it's€necessary€to€incarcerate€him€in€thisÏcase,€that€essentially€the€public€deserves€protection€from€hisÏfuture€criminal€activity.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà ` àà ¸ à.€.€.€ÌÌà ` àà8 ¸ à[¢G]iven£€the€pattern€of€deception€[with]€the€regulatory€agencies,Ïpattern€of€deception€in€telling€various€people€that€he€wouldÏmake€their€contract€good€and€issuing€bad€checks€and€has€not,Ïthe€potential€„„€there€is€just€no€indication€that€if€.€.€.€society€wereÏnot€protected€from€him,€as€was€pointed€out€through€witnessesÏwho€indicated€that€very€well€if€he€offered€pre„need€contractsÏthey€might€subscribe€to€them€in€the€very€near€future.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà ` àà8 ¸ àThe€Court€feels€.€.€.€that€if€this€man€is€at€liberty€the€public€is€atÏrisk€for€further€activities€involving€his€crime€[sic]€nature[,]€.€.€.€Ï[and]€that€it€would€not€be€in€the€best€interest€of€society€to€putÏthis€man€back€out€at€liberty€so€that€he€could€continue€hisÏcriminal€life.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌÓÓÌThe€trial€court€further€noted€defendant's€lack€of€candor,€total€lack€of€remorse,€andÏthat€his€"potential€for€rehabilitation€is€just€very,€very€negative."€€Based€upon€these€Ìfindings,€the€trial€court€denied€an€alternative€sentence€and€ordered€the€sentences€ÌÌÐ Ì84: Ðfor€counts€one€through€ten€(excepting€seven)€to€be€served€consecutively€to€oneÏanother€for€a€total€effective€sentence€of€eighteen€years.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Ð |Ì ÐÔ‡Xo8XXXßÒÔÌà@šš$àò òòòSTANDARD€OF€REVIEWóóó óˆÐ ( x ÐÌà ` àÔ#†XßÒXXXo8ò#ÔThis€Courtððs€review€of€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€is€òòde€novoóó€withÐ è 8  Ða€presumption€of€correctness.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€This€presumptionÏis€conditioned€upon€an€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€judgeÏconsidered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.€ÏòòState€v.€¢Ashby£óó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€Ð l ÐÌà ` àIf€our€review€reflects€that€the€trial€court€followed€the€statutory€sentencingÏprocedure,€imposed€a€lawful€sentence€after€giving€due€consideration€and€properÏweight€to€the€factors€and€principles€set€out€under€sentencing€law,€and€the€trialÏcourtððs€findings€of€fact€are€adequately€supported€by€the€record,€then€we€may€notÏmodify€the€sentence€even€if€we€would€have€preferred€a€different€result.€€òòState€v.Ð ä4 ÐFletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€at€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€Ð °!  ÐÌÔ‡Xo8XXXßÒÔà ` àA€court€may€order€sentences€to€run€consecutively€if€the€court€finds€by€aÐ H%˜ $ Ðpreponderance€of€the€evidence€that:ÌÓÓ€à8 ` à(1)€[¢t]he£€defendant€is€a€professional€criminal€who€has€knowinglyÐ )X$( Ðdevoted€himself€to€criminal€acts€as€a€major€source€of€livelihood;€orÐ ` Ð ` Ð  ÐÌÐ Ø+('+ Ðà8 ` à(2)€[¢t]he£€defendant€is€an€offender€whose€record€of€criminal€activity€isÏextensive.Ð ` Ð ` Ð  ÐÌÓÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(b);òò€see€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Blackóó,€924€S.W.2d€912€(Tenn.Ð €Ð ÐCrim.€App.€1995).€€Furthermore,€the€court€is€required€to€determine€whether€theÏconsecutive€sentences€(1)€are€reasonably€related€to€the€severity€of€the€offensesÏcommitted;€(2)€serve€to€protect€the€public€from€further€criminal€conduct€by€theÏoffender;€and€(3)€are€congruent€with€general€principles€of€sentencing.€€òòState€v.Ð P  ТWilkerson£óó,€905€S.W.2d€933,€939€(Tenn.€1995).Ð à0  ÐÌà@xx àò òòòPRESUMPTION€OF€CORRECTNESSˆÐ  ð Ðóóó óÌà ` àIn€this€case,€the€record€demonstrates€that€the€trial€judge€considered€theÏsentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.€€Thus,€theÏpresumption€of€correctness€attaches€to€his€findings.€€The€trial€court€specificallyÏfound€that€the€defendant€was€both€a€professional€criminal,€and€that€his€Ô#†XßÒXXXo8B#Ôrecord€ofÐ P Ðcriminal€activity€is€extensive.€€Moreover,€the€court€found€that€defendant's€crimesÏwere€very€severe,€and€that€the€public€needed€protection€from€further€criminalÏconduct€by€him.€€The€trial€judge€made€clear,€via€the€entirety€of€his€careful€andÏthorough€findings,€that€he€considered€this€sentence€appropriate€under€the€relevantÏsentencing€principles.€€ÌÌà@#àòòò òPROFESSIONAL€CRIMINALóóˆÐ ¬*ü%) Ðó óÌà ` àDefendant€€argues€that€he€should€not€be€classified€as€a€professional€criminalÏbecause€he€earned€substantial€other€income.€€The€record€belies€this€assertion.€€TheÏproof€established€that,€during€the€years€1988€through€1996,€his€business€generatedÏa€total€net€loss.€€Clearly,€defendant€was€relying€heavily€on€stolen€funds€to€stay€inÏbusiness.€€Furthermore,€a€defendant€may€earn€substantial€other€income€and€stillÏmeet€the€definition€of€professional€criminal.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€òòState€v.€Troy€¢Carney£€and€Ð L7œ27 ÐÐ 9l49 ÐJames€Andrew€Slaughter,€Jr.óó,€No.€¢01C01£„9412„CR„00425,€Davidson€County€(Tenn.Ð ° ÐCrim.€App.€filed€February€23,€1996,€at€Nashville).€€ÌÌà ` àDefendant€also€contends€that€he€is€not€a€professional€criminal€because€of€hisÏefforts€at€restitution.€€At€the€time€of€the€sentencing€hearing,€approximately€$100,000Ïhad€been€paid€toward€the€total€restitution€of€$670,000.€€However,€a€largeÏpercentage€of€this€money€came€from€his€wife's€retirement€fund.€€Indeed,€the€trialÏjudge€stated€that€defendant's€efforts€regarding€restitution€"have€been€extremelyÏcavalier€at€best."€€Furthermore,€efforts€at€restitution€do€not€mitigate€defendant'sÏactions€in€knowingly€devoting€himself€to€stealing€for€a€period€of€almost€ten€years.€€ÌÌà ` àDefendant€also€relies€upon€this€Court's€decision€in€òòState€v.€Eddie€L.€Howardóó,Ð tÄ ÐC.C.A.€No.€¢03C01£„9604„CC„00167,€Hamblen€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€filed€MarchÏ12,€1999,€at€Knoxville).€€In€that€case,€the€defendant€was€convicted€of€four€cocaineÏsales€of€$200€each€occurring€over€a€two€week€period.€€The€defendant's€prior€recordÏconsisted€of€€a€"retail€theft"€in€Illinois€and€one€or€two€convictions€for€driving€withoutÏa€license€in€Tennessee.€€The€trial€court€determined€that€the€defendant€was€aÏprofessional€criminal€on€the€basis€that€he€was€earning€only€$25€to€$50€per€week€atÏhis€job.€€This€Court€disagreed€with€the€trial€court's€determination€because€there€wasÏno€evidence€in€the€record€that€the€defendant€obtained€his€livelihood€almost€entirelyÏthrough€criminal€activity.€€ÌÌà ` àThe€òòHowardóó€case€is€clearly€distinguishable€from€the€case€at€bar.€€ContraryÐ 8,ˆ', Ðto€defendant's€argument,€it€does€not€hold€that€a€defendant€can€be€found€aÏprofessional€criminal€only€if€he€has€an€extensive€prior€criminal€record;€otherwise,€theÏstatutory€provision€for€professional€criminal€would€be€superfluous€to€that€forÏoffenders€with€extensive€records.€€We€are€required€to€construe€statutes€so€that€noÏpart€is€rendered€"inoperative,€superfluous,€void€or€insignificant."€€òòState€v.€Hallóó,€976Ð 45„06 ÐS.W.2d€121,€174€(Tenn.€1998).€€In€this€case,€defendant€systematically€stole€overÏ$670,000€from€the€members€of€his€community€over€the€course€of€a€decade.€€SinceÐ Ì84: Ðhis€business€was€not€generating€enough€money€to€sustain€itself,€the€stolen€fundsÏwere€defendant's€major€source€of€livelihood.€€ÌÌà ` àThe€trial€court's€determination€in€this€case€that€defendant€is€a€professionalÏcriminal€within€the€context€of€consecutive€sentencing€was€correct.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.Ð à 0 ÐFrank€¢Whitus£óó,€C.C.A.€No.€¢01C01£„9301„CR„00038,€Sumner€County€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð °  ÐApp.€filed€July€22,€1993,€at€Nashville)€(defendant€who€systematically€defrauded€theÏTennessee€Housing€Development€Authority€over€three€years,€€involving€twenty„¼seven€fraudulent€loans€amounting€to€over€$1,000,000,€was€a€professional€criminal).€ÏThis€issue€is€without€merit.€€Ìà@-àò òòòˆÌà@»»$àòòWILKERSONóó€FINDINGSó óóóˆÐ „Ô ÐÌà ` àDefendant€also€argues€that€there€is€no€indication€in€the€record€that€he€posesÏa€threat€to€the€public,€or€that€he€is€likely€to€engage€in€future€criminal€activity.€€òòSeeóóÐ ôD ÐòòState€v.€Wilkersonóó,€905€S.W.2d€933,€939€(Tenn.€1995).€€He€contends€that€this€wasÐ Ä Ða€"crime€of€opportunity"€and€that€the€opportunity€no€longer€exists€because€he€hasÏlost€his€licenses€to€operate€as€a€funeral€director€and€embalmer.€€This€argumentÏignores€defendant's€prior€conduct€in€selling€pre„need€contracts€while€¢unlicensed£€toÏdo€so.€€It€also€ignores€the€fact€that,€at€the€time€of€the€hearing,€defendant€wasÏworking€for€another€funeral€home,€and€that€one€of€his€customers€testified€he€wouldÏbuy€a€pre„need€contract€from€defendant€in€the€future€if€he€could.€€Indeed,Ïdefendant's€employer€testified€that€he€had€hired€defendant€for€his€connections€in€theÏcommunity,€and€"[t]here's€a€lot€of€people€that€still€likes€(sic)€Joe€Frank€Boyd."€€TheÏtrial€judge,€in€a€much€better€position€to€judge€the€credibility€of€the€defendant€thanÏthis€Court,€specifically€found€that€the€public€needed€protection€from€defendant'sÏcriminal€activity.€€The€evidence€does€not€preponderate€against€this€finding.€€ÌÐ T5¤06 Ðà@xx(àò òòòCONCLUSIONˆÐ ° Ðó óóóÌà ` àDefendant€failed€to€carry€his€burden€of€proving€that€the€trial€court€erred€inÏsentencing€him.€€We€ò òAFFIRMó ó€the€trial€court's€determination€that€defendant€serveÐ  p Ða€portion€of€his€sentences€consecutively€for€an€effective€sentence€of€eighteen€years.€ÏHowever,€because€the€trial€court's€pronouncement€from€the€bench€omittedÏdefendant's€sentence€for€count€three,€and€because€the€judgment€form€for€count€fourÏreflects€a€different€sentence€than€that€stated€by€the€judge€and€agreed€to€byÏdefendant,€we€must€ò òREMANDó ó€this€matter€in€order€for€the€trial€court€to€correct€theseÐ (x Ðinconsistencies.€€We€further€note€that€each€of€the€judgment€forms€for€counts€elevenÏthrough€one€hundred€sixty€indicates€that€the€sentence€for€each€of€those€offensesÏruns€consecutively€to€counts€one€through€ten€(but€concurrent€with€one€another).€ÏThis,€too,€appears€inconsistent€with€the€trial€judge's€ruling.€€Accordingly,€on€remandÏthe€trial€court€shall€enter€corrected€judgments€to€reflect€that€those€sentences€runÏconcurrently€with€counts€one€through€ten.€€In€all€other€respects,€the€judgment€belowÏis€affirmed.€€ÌÓÓÌÌÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à____________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGEó óÐ &b!% Ðò òÌÌCONCUR:Ìó óÌÌÌ____________________________ò òÐ t,Ä', ÐJOHN€H.€¢PEAY£,€JUDGEÌó óÌÌÌ____________________________ò òÐ ø0H,1 ÐTHOMAS€T.€¢WOODALL£,€JUDGEó óÐ Þ1.-2 ÐÌÌÌÌ