WPC6 uPOMׇP?ɍ#:ƻ jK~PQ8=tf#:&6RoL5_FWX)e^~G 00LF!zyr og \ 1,ޢͷ6(ͤ lo QvȓM>24N5+DPˏ<7;0X҆&Btfqg2,fPl̠zWluuBk-AT.l$x~M)(L!|* SH #ut쁺]$,a,d Y[{t' ⓿Pupg7Kv dnU bc]%GI4j y6[j 1yؕN 9k)#0!W2ǘB''Ӄl"e< h#_{.~F:i,U.h %bU:Bn[ 0(cU :w4w A 0 0De U : U: U: &W D3} U: 0D B.... AQK 0Db 0D D/ B<6X9`(CourierX ,cAZ"Arial Regular 8 *XR}XXX `   1     Theissueoftheelementofmensreabeingomittedfroman `  indictmentandthehabeascorpuscountsfailuretoreviewtheissuewaived.Tenn.R.App.P.____. x (XXXX `   1     Theissueoftheelementofmensreabeingomittedfroman `  indictmentandthehabeascorpuscourtsfailuretoreviewtheissuearenotpresentedonappeal.We,therefore,deemtheseissueswaived.Tenn.R.App.P.13(b).3|x{.<6X9`(CourierXx6X@`7X@($,  AZ"Arial Regular9.D:.;.<.E=.>.D?.@.DA.B.EC.D.DE.F.G.DH.DI.BeJ.DK.g.h.Ei.j.Ek.l.Em.n.Eo.p.ӀV& 7 *X2XXX `   1     Theissueoftheelementofmensreabeingomittedfroman `  indictmentandthehabeascorpuscountsfailuretoreviewtheissuewaived.Tenn.R.App.P.____.(I(2($  !  XXXX `   0  (#$  0  ,cAZ"Arial Regular,cAZ"Arial Regular,cAZ"Arial Regular  ("  XXXX>XX   Ad FILEDXX>   April20,1999  CecilCrowson,Jr. XXAppellateCourtClerk """"'dxd,cAZ"Arial Regular(3$  !   d'(!)*C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$  !  ($$   1  ++' dxdP Pd  !  I.I.I.I.`   TR[A'Legal3'A' Legal3'T XbkXXX7 bk XXdd7  $X,XX$I.I. p.r&<,(j 8` `@Ef ` ttx$` rߛp.@ INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE `  ̀@::'ATKNOXVILLE @  @#DECEMBER1998SESSION     TROYLEONBROADRICK,    )   `     h     ) p  p   `  Appellant, h     ) p C.C.A.No.03C019801CC00011 `   `     h     )vs. `     h     ) p BledsoeCounty x  @   `     h     ) STATEOFTENNESSEE, h     ) p Hon.J.CurtisSmith,Judge      `     h     ) p  `  Appellee. h     ) p (HabeasCorpus) `  `     h     FORTHEAPPELLANT: h      p FORTHEAPPELLEE:    TROYLEONBROADRICK(prose)   p JOHNKNOXWALKUP   Rt.4Box600   h      p AttorneyGeneral&Reporter  Pikeville,TN373673243  h    `     h      p R.STEPHENJOBE   p  `     h      p AssistantAttorneyGeneral `     h      p 425FifthAve.N.,2dFloor  "P   `     h      p Nashville,TN372430493 #@  `     h      p JAMESMICHAELTAYLOR %   `     h      p DistrictAttorneyGeneral  p&  `     h      p      `     h      p JAMESW.POPEIII  P(!  `     h      p AssistantDistrictAttorney `     h      p TwelfthJudicialDistrict  0* #  `     h      p 265ThirdAve.,Suite300 `     h      p Dayton,TN37321 OPINIONFILED:________________AFFIRMEDJAMESCURWOODWITT,JR.,JUDGE  30*-  <26S @qq* OPINION  `  XXX Xbk-,, XX,X- Thepetitioner,TroyLeonBroadrick,appealsfromtheBledsoeCountyCircuitCourtsorderdismissinghispetitionforhabeascorpusrelief.In1987,ajuryconvictedthepetitionerofninecountsofaggravatedrape,threecountsofrape,andonecountofsexualbattery.Thejudgesentencedhimtoaneffectivesentenceof63yearsintheDepartmentofCorrection.Heappealedhisconvictions,andthiscourtaffirmedonJune29,1989.SeeStatev.TroyBroadrick,No.88257III(Tenn.   Crim.App.,Nashville,June29,1989).OnJuly28,1997,hefiledaprosepetition t forhabeascorpusrelief.# XbkXXXñ#XXX XbkThecourtbelow# XbkXXX#XXX Xbkdismissedtheactionwithoutahearing# XbkXXX#XXX Xbk @ becausethecourtfoundthatthepetitionerdidnotassertgroundswhichwouldentitlehimtothewritofhabeascorpus.# XbkXXXÀ#Thepetitionercontendsthatthetrialcourt 8 erredinnotaddressingI.I.issuesI.I.presentedinthepetition,notorderinganevidentiaryhearing,andnotappointingcounsel.XXX XbkTheissuespresentedI.I.onI.I.thepetitionare:(1)   whethertheindictmentsweredefectivebecausetheydidnotstateamensreaor " didnotstateaspecificdatefortheoffensecharged,orboth,I.I.I.K.K.K.K.I.I.I. #  1      K.K.I.I.J.wJ.I.I.I.I.(2)I.I.whetherhiswife, $P atthetimeofprosecution,wascoercedtotestifyagainsthiminviolationofTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection241201,andI.I.(3)whetherI.I.sheshouldhavetestifiedI.I.inviewofI.I.thefactthatshewasunderpsychiatriccarewithheavyI.I.medication.# XbkXXX$#I.X2XX X2# X2XXX2#I.XXX XbkFollowingI.I.areviewoftherecordandthebriefsoftheparties,weaffirm +"& thetrialcourtsdismissalofthepetition.# XbkXXX#XXX XbkԀ# XbkXXX# -L$( I.I. XXX XbkThepetitionerfiledanuntimelynoticeofappeal,butthiscourtmay X1', waivethetimerequirementforfilinganoticeofappeal intheinterestofjustice.Tenn.R.App.P.4(a);seeStatev.Scales,767S.W.2d157(Tenn.1989).The 4+0 untimelyfilingbythepetitionerhasnotprejudicedthestate;therefore,wewaivethisrequirementintheinterestofjustice.# XR}XXXR}#XR}XX XR}ԀSeeStatev.Mullins,767S.W.2d668,669   (Tenn.Crim.App.1988).Accordingly,wewilladdressthemeritsofthepetition.# XR}XXXR}#  I.I. Habeascorpusreliefisverylimitedbecauseitisonlyavailablewhen itappearsuponthefaceofthejudgmentortherecordoftheproceedingsuponwhichthejudgmentisrenderedthataconvictingcourtwaswithoutjurisdictionorauthoritytosentenceadefendant,orthatadefendantssentenceofimprisonmentorotherrestrainthasexpired.Archerv.State,851S.W.2d157,164(Tenn.1993) @ (quotingStatev.Galloway,45Tenn.(5Cold.)326,33637(Tenn.1868)).Inother   I.I.words,exceptforcasesofexpiredsentences,I.I.habeascorpusreliefisgrantedonlywhenajudgmentisvoid. Avoidjudgmentisoneinwhichthejudgmentisfaciallyinvalidbecausethecourtdidnothavethestatutoryauthoritytorendersuchjudgment.Dykesv.Compton,978S.W.2d528,529(Tenn.1998)(citingArcher, #@ 851S.W.2dat161).Apetitionforhabeascorpusreliefmaybesummarilydismissed [i]f,fromtheshowingofthepetitioner,theplaintiffwouldnotbeentitledtoanyrelief.Tenn.CodeAnn.2921109(1998);seealsoJamesR.Twittyv. @)" HowardCarlton,No.03C019707CR00310,slipop.at5(Tenn.Crim.App.,  +!$ Knoxville,Jan.6,1999)(citingPassarellav.State,891S.W.2d619,627(Tenn. -#& Crim.App.1994)).Thecourtneednotappointcounselif,fromthefaceofthepetition,therearenogroundsforrelief.SeeEarlThomasMitchell,Jr.v.Howard 0`'* Carlton,No.03C019704CR00125,slipop.at3(Tenn.Crim.App.,Knoxville,Jan. 2@), 12,1998). Wemustfirstdetermineiftheallegationsmadebythepetitionermaybereviewedinahabeascorpusproceeding.XR}XX XR}First,thepetitionercontendsthatthe  :04 indictmentsweredefectivebecausetheydidnotstateaI.I.specificI.I.datefortheoffenseI.I.charged.# XR}XXXR} $#I.I.InDykesv.Compton,theTennesseeSupremeCourtaddressedtheissue @  ofwhetherachallengetoindictmentscouldbereviewedinahabeascorpusproceeding.Thecourtstatedthat thevalidityofanindictmentandtheefficacyoftheresultingconvictionmaybeaddressedinapetitionforhabeascorpuswhenthe  indictmentissodefectiveastodeprivethecourtofjurisdiction.Dykes,978S.W.2d `  at529.̀ Thepetitionerchallengescertainindictmentsbecausespecificdateswerenotstatedforthetimeoftheoffenses.I.I.Rather,lessI.I.specifictimes,suchI.I.as heretoforeonoraboutmidSummer,I.I.1984,werelistedoncertainindictments.Thepetitionercontendsthathecouldnotprepareanadequatedefensewithoutspecificdatesstatedintheindictments. TheruleoflawiswellestablishedinTennesseethattheexactdate,oreventheyear,ofanoffenseneednotbestatedinanindictmentorpresentmentunlessthedateortimeisamaterialingredientintheoffense.Statev.Byrd,820S.W.2d739,740(Tenn.1991)(quotingTenn.Code %  Ann.4013207(1991)).Examplesofatimeordatebeingamaterialingredientofanoffensearestatutesrequiringanoffensetooccuronacertainday,suchasaSunday,oratacertaintime,suchasatnight.See,e.g.,Tenn.CodeAnn.39  +!$ 171702(1997)(TheChildCurfewActof1995requiresindividualsundereighteenyearsofagetobeawayfrompublicplacesbycertaintimesoncertaindays.Inordertoprosecuteanindividualunderthisact,theindictmentwouldhavetospecifytheexactdayandtimeoftheoffense).Theoffensesofaggravatedrape,rapeandsexualbatterydonotrequireanexactdayortime.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.392 4 +. 603,604,607(1986)(repealedI.I.1989);Statev.West,787S.W.2d790,79293 `6-0 (Tenn.Crim.App.1987).I.I.Becausetimeisnotamaterialingredientoftheoffensescharged,thestatedidnothavetospecifydatesintheindictment.Byrd,820S.W.2d  :04 at740. Ifitisnotapparentfromthefaceoftherecordthatajudgmentisvoid,thenhabeascorpusreviewisnotappropriate.SeeArcherv.State,851S.W.2d  157,164(Tenn.1993);Passarellav.State,891S.W.2d619,627(Tenn.Crim.App.  1994).Fromreviewingtherecord,wefindthatthetrialcourtpossessedjurisdictionoverthepetitionerandthesubjectmatter,andpossessedthestatutoryauthoritytorenderthejudgments.Inthiscase,thepetitionerwouldhavetoproveprejudicetohisdefenseduetothestatesinabilitytospecifydatesintheindictment.Statev. ` Ealey,959S.W.2d605,609(Tenn.Crim.App.1997).Thiswouldrequireproof @ beyondtherecorditself,whichI.I.maybeI.I.appropriateinapostconvictionproceeding,butnotinahabeascorpusproceeding.Dykesv.Compton,978S.W.2d528,529  (Tenn.1998).AstheTennesseeSupremeCourtstatedinArcher, [t]hepetitionin  thiscase,...,allegesonlythat,uponintroductionoffurtherproofandafterappropriatefindingsoffactbythetrialjudge,thefaciallyvalidjudgmentmaybe #@ voided.Archer,851S.W.2dat164.Thelackofspecificdatesintheindictments %  doesnotrenderthejudgmentsI.I.voidI.I.I.I..Therefore,I.I.thisissueisnotcognizableinahabeascorpusproceeding.I.I.I.I.XR}XX XR}I.I. I.I.Next,I.I.thepetitionercontendsthathiswife,atthetimeofprosecution, -#& shouldnothavebeencoercedtotestifyagainsthim,andsheshouldnothavetestifiedbecauseshewasunderpsychiatriccarewithheavymedication.# XR}XXXR}h4# 0`'* I.I.Th..is../.ese/.I.I.I.I.issue0.s0.I.I.I.I.1.is1.2.are2.I.I.notcognizableinahabeascorpusI.I.proceeding.4.Thisisacollateralattackonanotherwisevalidconviction;therefore,reviewofthisissuewouldbeproperinapostconvictionproceeding,butnotinahabeascorpusproceeding.4.5.5.SeeArcherv. 2@), State,851S.W.2d157,164(Tenn.1993).I.I. 4 +.  Whenclaimsarenotcognizableinahabeascorpusproceeding,acourtmaytreatapetitionforhabeascorpusreliefasapetitionforpostconviction  :04 relief.Tenn.CodeAnn.4030205(c)(1997).Inordertotreatthispetitionasoneforpostconvictionrelief,thepetitionmustcomplywiththeprovisionsofthePostConvictionProcedureActof1995.I.I.6.Accordingly6.7.Undertheact7.,I.I.thepetitionistimebarredbecauseitwasfiledbeyondtheoneyearstatuteoflimitationsperiod.Tenn.CodeAnn.4030202(a)(1997).ThepetitionerhasstatednoreasonI.I.for8.avoiding8.I.I.thestatuteofI.I.limitations9.tobewaivedundertheseparticularfacts.Ad9.:..Ad:.ditionally,I.I.thepetitionisI.I.barred;.asoneforp;.<.;.sot;.<.=.ostconvictionϜrelief=.g.g.h.g.nrvudrg.h.j.i.nri.j.k.bk.l.k.4ck.l.m.ecam.n.m.iusem.n.o.useito.=.is=.>.becausethepetitionerdid>.I.I.notI.I.fil@.?.d?.@.eA.d,asrequA.B.A.yA.B.C.ired,inC.D.inthecorrectcourtforpostconvictionrelief,whichisD.I.I.thecourtinwhichtheconvictionoccurred.Tenn.CodeAnn.4030204(a)(1997). BecausewefindthatthepetitiondoesnotstategroundsI.I.forF.habeascorpusF.E.E.G.G.reliefH.inahabeascorpusproceedingH.,I.I.weaffirmthetrialcourtsdismissalofthepetitionwithoutahearing.    h     ________________________________    h     JAMESCURWOODWITT,JR.,JUDGECONCUR:_______________________________DAVIDG.HAYES,JUDGE_______________________________JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE