ÿWPCÀ 5ûÎd ÝFAwŠG]û°.çÄ5 ¢RŠ`^¨™«zÄTc\q)åï¯Íb¯ÓöƒÕ–§>Éi‚!¡kåB/aê0W¶†”ÈSЧ®…ÈF3XÈZ‡êChí3æÉ ƒf‘EæÆ]¨B·‘¾Þ¸aùsywNÜÆº³e¸Þ…ЏL˜~À“ %;`àÕkÜå1×…m7eGº¢aLÂ|*{޹5B·ôè—t a‡¦·‹ÎN†åR!ÞL|\ï·sEÍ7 ü¢ÅZl%Ò+»)5ZP™²AS]•+eNÌA‹ÅÀ˜EaÄy™e.Ù‡'‰•b#Á\ % ^ # 0ˆ/ U N· w 4 z Ò— i x mz ‘ Æ™ Æ_ Æ% Æë ë N±±±E³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³bµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµ 0ë½½½½ B¨¨ 0¤Å D3i D-œ 0KÉÉ ASÆg 0¤- 0DÑ A«˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0»Ïyü( (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularÖJ~'Ø’Ÿê:i¢Ø ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- ù-(|G2(È$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€F»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€X+|X»»Ô d(|3–q$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€F»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3–q$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€F»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€F»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€¼F»»»ÔÑ8€+|XXdæ»»d8Ñà@HHìàIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@§§$ìàAT€NASHVILLEˆÐ ¾ ÐÔ‡X+|X»¼FÔà@;;!ìàAPRIL€2000€SESSIONˆÐ Ì ÐÌò òÔ#†¼F»XX+|k#ÔÓ  ÓRODNEY€Ô_ÔBUFORDÔ_Ô€v.€STATE€OF€TENNESSEEó óÐ ˜è ÐÓëÓÌÔ€X+|X»¼FÔà@  ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔHickmanÔ_Ô€CountyˆÐ ´  Ðà@í í ìàNo.€99„5075C„I€Timothy€L.€Easter,€Judge€ˆÐ š ê ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<K` A߈Ð Lœ  ÐÌà@8 8 ìàNo.€M1999„00487„CCA„R3„PC€„€Filed€July€28,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_Ô€ˆÐ A‘  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE< ` AßÐ  ]  Ðó óÌThe€petitioner,€Rodney€Ô_ÔBufordÔ_Ô,€is€serving€an€effective€sentence€of€life€plus€twenty€years.€€HisÐ R  Ðpetition€for€habeas€corpus€relief€was€properly€dismissed€by€the€trial€court€because€the€judgment€isÐ è8 Ðnot€facially€invalid€and€the€sentence€has€not€been€served.€€Ð Î ÐÌò òà@! ! ìàTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€Affirmed.ó óˆÐ šê ÐÌòòGary€R.€Wade,€Ô_ÔP.J.Ô_Ô,€óó€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJohn€Everett€Williamsóó€andÐ f¶ ÐòòRobert€W.€Ô_ÔWedemeyerÔ_Ô,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð Lœ ÐÌRodney€Ô_ÔBufordÔ_Ô,€Only,€Tennessee,€Pro€Se.€€Ð h ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter,€Marvin€E.€Clements,€Jr.,€Assistant€AttorneyÐ ä4 ÐGeneral,€and€Ronald€L.€Davis,€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.€€Ð Ê ÐÌà@55'ìàò òOPINIONó óˆÐ –æ ÐÌà  àThe€petitioner,€Rodney€Ô_ÔBufordÔ_Ô,€appeals€the€trial€court's€denial€of€habeas€corpus€relief.€€In€thisÐ b ²  Ðappeal€of€right,€the€petitioner€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€refusing€to€grant€relief€from€a€lifeÐ H!˜! Ðsentence.€€The€judgment€is€affirmed.Ð ."~" ÐÌà  àThe€record€indicates€that€the€petitioner€was€indicted€for€seven€offenses€in€April€of€1989.€Ð ú#J$ ÐAlmost€one€year€later,€in€two€separate€proceedings,€the€petitioner€entered€pleas€of€guilt€to€four€countsÐ à$0 % Ðof€armed€robbery€and€one€count€of€felony€murder.€€The€remaining€two€counts€of€the€indictment€wereÐ Æ%!& Ðdismissed.€€The€trial€court€imposed€sentences€of€ten€years€on€each€of€the€armed€robbery€offenses€andÐ ¬&ü!' Ða€life€sentence€on€the€felony€murder.€€Because€two€of€the€robbery€sentences€were€ordered€to€beÐ ’'â"( Ðserved€consecutively,€the€effective€sentence€is€life€plus€20€years.Ð x(È#) ÐÌà  àIn€his€1999€petition€for€habeas€corpus€relief,€the€petitioner€claimed€that€the€conviction€andÐ D*”%+ Ðsentence€for€felony€murder€were€void€because€he€was€sentenced€under€the€Criminal€SentencingÐ *+z&, ÐReform€Act€of€1989,€which€took€effect€November€1€of€that€year,€rather€than€the€1982€Act.€€He€pointsÐ ,`'- Ðout€that€release€eligibility€under€the€1982€Act€is€30€years.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€40„35„501(f)Ð ö,F(. Ð(repealed€1989).€€Release€eligibility€for€a€life€sentence€under€the€1989€Act€is€60%€of€60€years,€or€36Ð Ü-,)/ýµ ÐÔ_Ôyears.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„501(h)(1).€€In€support€of€his€claim,€the€petitioner€cites€òòState€v.Ð ° ÐPearsonóó,€858€S.W.2d€879€(Tenn.€1993),€wherein€our€supreme€court€ruled€that€defendants€who€areÐ –æ Ðsentenced€after€the€effective€date€of€the€1989€Act€for€crimes€committed€before€the€effective€date€ofÐ |Ì Ðthe€Act€are€entitled€to€the€lesser€of€the€sentences€required€after€comparing€the€terms€of€the€1982€ActÐ b² Ðand€the€1989€Act.€€The€petitioner€submits€that€the€sentencing€procedure€utilized€by€the€trial€courtÐ H˜ Ðviolated€the€ex€post€facto€provisions€of€both€the€Tennessee€and€the€United€States€Constitutions.€€InÐ . ~ Ðsummary,€he€contends€that€the€facial€invalidity€of€the€conviction€and€the€illegality€of€the€sentenceÐ  d Ðwarrant€habeas€corpus€relief.Ð ú J ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€concluded€that€habeas€corpus€relief€is€available€only€when€the€judgment€isÐ Æ   Ðvoid€or€the€sentence€of€imprisonment€has€expired.€€òòSeeóó€òòArcher€v.€Stateóó,€851€S.W.2d€157€(Tenn.Ð ¬ ü  Ð1993).€€After€concluding€that€a€life€sentence€was€appropriate€under€either€the€1982€Act€or€the€1989Ð ’â  ÐAct,€the€trial€court€determined€that€the€sentence€was€lawful,€whether€there€were€dual€calculations€asÐ xÈ  Ðrequired€by€òòPearsonóó€or€not.€€The€trial€court€concluded€that€because€the€petitioner€was€in€the€custodyÐ ^®  Ðof€the€Department€of€Correction,€any€disputes€regarding€time€credits€or€parole€were€internalÐ D”  Ðadministrative€issues€controlled€by€the€Uniform€Administrative€Procedures€Act€and€inappropriateÐ *z  Ðfor€consideration€in€a€habeas€corpus€proceeding.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€4„5„101,€et€seq.€€Ð ` ÐÌà  àIn€this€state,€a€writ€of€habeas€corpus€may€be€granted€only€when€a€petitioner€has€establishedÐ Ü, Ðlack€of€jurisdiction€for€the€order€of€confinement€or€when€he€is€otherwise€entitled€to€immediateÐ Â Ðrelease€because€of€the€expiration€of€his€sentence.€€òòSeeóó€òòUssery€v.€Averyóó,€222€Tenn.€50,€432€S.W.2dÐ ¨ø Ð656€(1968);€òòState€ex€rel.€Wade€v.€Norvellóó,€1€Tenn.€Crim.€App.€447,€443€S.W.2d€839€(1969).€€AÐ ŽÞ Ð"person€imprisoned€or€restrained€of€his€liberty,€under€any€pretense€whatsoever,€.€.€.€may€prosecuteÐ tÄ Ða€writ€of€habeas€corpus,€to€inquire€into€the€cause€of€such€imprisonment€.€.€.€."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ Zª Ð29„21„101.€€A€writ€of€habeas€corpus,€however,€is€available€only€when€it€appears€on€the€face€of€theÐ @ Ðjudgment€or€the€record€that€the€trial€court€was€without€jurisdiction€to€convict€or€sentence€theÐ &v Ðdefendant€or€that€the€sentence€of€imprisonment€has€otherwise€expired.€€òòArcheróó,€851€S.W.2d€at€164;Ð  \ ÐòòPotts€v.€Stateóó,€833€S.W.2d€60,€62€(Tenn.€1992).€€Trial€courts€may€summarily€dismiss€a€petition€forÐ òB Ðwrit€of€habeas€corpus€without€the€appointment€of€a€lawyer€and€without€an€evidentiary€hearing€ifÐ Ø( Ðthere€is€nothing€on€the€face€of€the€judgment€to€indicate€that€the€convictions€addressed€therein€areÐ ¾ Ðvoid.€€òòPasserella€v.€Stateóó,€891€S.W.2d€619€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994).€€Ð ¤ô ÐÌà  àBecause€habeas€corpus€relief€is€limited€to€instances€where€the€judgment€is€void€or€the€termÐ p!À  Ðof€imprisonment€has€expired,€the€petitioner€is€not€entitled€to€relief.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€ex€rel.€Kuntz€v.€Bomaróó,Ð V"¦! Ð214€Tenn.€500,€504,€381€S.W.2d€290,€291„92€(1964).€€The€transcript€of€the€submission€hearing€isÐ <#Œ" Ðin€the€record.€€There€is€no€reference€to€release€eligibility.€€Because€the€range€of€sentence€was€theÐ "$r# Ðsame€under€both€the€1982€Act€and€the€1989€Act,€there€is€no€facial€invalidity.€€Clearly,€the€petitionerÐ %X $ Ðis€not€entitled€to€immediate€relief.€€Because€the€petition€does€not€establish€any€basis€for€a€habeasÐ î%>!% Ðcorpus€claim,€the€trial€court€properly€dismissed€it.€€Ô_ÔÐ  Ô&$"& Ðà  àAccordingly,€the€judgment€is€affirmed.€€Ð ° ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à____________________________________Ð H˜ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àGARY€R.€WADE,€PRESIDING€JUDGEÐ . ~ Ð