ÿWPCÐ …UBV %˜U.žÌnXÜ 044 h w@p 4° 0JÄ 0T 0^b 0hÀ 0r( 0|š 0† 0œ 1u, U,¡ 0dÍ U,1U6]B)“DC¼ AMÿþL BJv~gvÓå D3¸ 0@ë AO+Æz 0D@ D/„ B³<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiX%ä2¼A`ArialTT3|Xæ«<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXxþ6X@ÉJQX@%ä2¼A`ArialTTt10cpiXXXä2¼P±ŠQXP( ¤T$¡¡Ó  Ó ÒÓDÔÕÖרÙÚÓ€æ»{s 2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(Courier New% Line 7 d!!!!7Border 1dd€-"Cþÿ << Gÿÿ ôÝ ƒ!ÝÔ€ÔÔ€ ÔÝ  ÝÔ€ÔÔ€ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€XÔÌÌò òJune€28,€1996ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó dPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHØ(d'`Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Monaco ÒÒ  BA Op Monaco Ò%%%%'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÓ&€X„d&ÓÑ#€Xd#ÑÔ€ ÔÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓ  ÓÑ\R AØ'\ÑÔ€Ô›IN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌÙ€€ÙœßL€#$";+'h|3` Å `€€Lß›AT€JACKSONÌÌSEPTEMBER€1995€SESSIONÌÓ  ÓÌÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà à€€€€€€€€€APPELLEE,à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àNo.€02„C„01„9408„CR„00165Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àShelby€CountyÌv.à àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àJoseph€B.€Brown,€Jr.,€JudgeÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)à à(Felony€Murder€and€AggravatedÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)à à€€Assault)ÌGEORGE€CAMPBELL,€JR.,à àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àAPPELLANT.à à)ÌÌÌÌÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à àà àà àà àà àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:ÌÌBrett€Steinà àà àà àà àà àà àà àCharles€W.€BursonÌAttorney€at€Lawà àà àà àà àà àà àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÌ100€North€Main€Buildingà àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌMemphis,€TN€38103à àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493ÌÌWayne€Chastainà àà àà àà àà àà àEugene€J.€HoneaÌAttorney€at€Lawà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌ66€Monroe€Avenue,€Suite€804à àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌMemphis,€TN€38103à àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àJohn€W.€PierottiÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà à201€Poplar€Avenue,€Third€FloorÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àMemphis,€TN€38103ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àThomas€D.€HendersonÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àAsst.€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà à201€Poplar€Avenue,€Third€FloorÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àMemphis,€TN€38103ÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:______________________________ÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌÌJoe€B.€Jones,€Judgeà àà à€ÌÌÑ7€_/XXdæXXdÈ7ÑÓ  Óò òO€P€I€N€I€O€Nó óÌÓ  ÓÌÌÌÓÓà àThe€appellant,€George€Campbell,€Jr.€(Campbell),€was€convicted€of€felonyÏmurder€and€aggravated€assault€by€a€jury€of€his€peers.€€The€jury€sentenced€theÏappellant€to€confinement€for€life€in€the€Department€of€Correction€for€the€felony€murder.€ÏThe€trial€court€found€that€the€appellant€was€a€multiple€offender€and€imposed€a€Range€IIÏsentence€of€confinement€for€ten€(10)€years€in€the€Department€of€Correction.€€The€trialÏcourt€ordered€that€the€two€sentences€be€served€consecutively.Ìà àFour€issues€are€presented€for€review.€€The€appellant€contends€that€(1)€the€stateÏfailed€to€provide€him€with€the€McGary€statement€which€contained€exculpatory€evidenceÏand€€the€trial€court€committed€prejudicial€error€œby›€(2)€denying€his€pretrial€motion€for€aÏcopy€of€the€McGary€statement€and€to€dismiss€on€speedy€trial€grounds,€(3)€failing€toÏstrike€the€state's€proffer€of€a€photograph€depicting€a€blue€truck,€and€(4)€denying€hisÏmotion€for€judgment€of€acquittal€at€the€conclusion€of€the€state's€case€in€chief.Ìà àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ìà àCampbell,€Vander€Moore,€and€Lontina€McGary€conspired€to€commit€robberiesÍin€Memphis€and€the€surrounding€area.€€Campbell€master„minded€the€scheme.€€HeÏinvestigated€and€chose€the€location€of€the€robbery,€he€furnished€transportation€to€andÏfrom€the€site€of€the€robbery,€he€supplied€the€handguns€used€by€Moore€and€McGaryÏduring€the€commission€of€the€robberies,€and€they€returned€the€guns€to€Campbell€afterÏthe€robbery.€€Campbell€also€told€Moore€and€McGary€how€they€should€commit€theÏrobberies.Ìà àOn€the€afternoon€of€April€22,€1991,€Campbell€called€McGary€and€told€her€thatÏthey€had€a€"hit,"€meaning€a€robbery.€€They€agreed€to€meet€at€the€Southland€Mall,€whichÏis€located€in€southwest€Memphis.€€When€McGary€arrived€at€the€mall,€Campbell€andÏMoore€had€already€arrived.€€They€left€the€mall€in€Campbell's€truck.€€Campbell€gaveÏMoore€and€McGary€the€handguns,€he€explained€what€they€were€to€do€and€how€theyÏwere€to€gain€access€to€the€residence,€and€he€drove€by€the€residence,€located€inÏShelby€County,€so€that€Moore€and€McGary€could€see€it.€€They€exited€the€truck,Ïobtained€a€package€of€speakers€from€the€bed€of€the€pickup€truck,€and€went€to€the€frontÏdoor€of€the€residence.€€The€residence€was€occupied€by€Anthony€Bean,€his€sister,ÏPhyllis€Ann€Dodson,€his€girlfriend,€Markette€Marsh,€and€Bean's€minor€son.€€Bean'sÏnephew€who€also€lived€in€the€residence€was€not€at€home.€€The€victim,€KevinÏMcConico,€owned€an€entertainment€newspaper€and€had€gone€to€the€residence€toÏdiscuss€a€new€advertisement€for€a€beauty€supply€business€owned€by€Bean€andÏDodson.Ìà àWhen€Moore€and€McGary€rang€the€front€door€bell,€Bean€told€them€that€the€frontÏdoor€was€stuck€and€directed€them€to€the€side€door.€€Bean€became€suspicious.€€HeÏasked€his€girlfriend,€Markette€D.€Marsh,€to€answer€the€side€door.€Bean€went€to€aÍbedroom€located€on€the€second€floor,€retrieved€his€handgun,€and€waited.€€When€Ms.ÏMarsh€opened€the€side€door,€McGary€stated€that€the€box€had€been€delivered€toÏMcGary's€home€by€mistake.€€As€McGary€passed€the€box€to€Ms.€Marsh,€both€Moore€andÏMcGary€drew€the€handguns€and€ordered€Ms.€Marsh€and€the€victim€to€lay€on€the€floor.€ÏMarsh€complied€with€the€request.€€The€victim€retrieved€his€briefcase€and€beganÏrunning€to€the€rear€of€the€residence.€€Moore€œgrabbed›€him,€they€wrestled,€and€MooreÏmaneuvered€him€into€the€foyer€near€the€front€door.€€As€McGary€and€Bean€exchangedÏgunfire,€Moore€shot€the€victim€in€the€head€over€his€left€eye.€€Thereafter,€Moore€andÏMcGary€left€the€residence,€ran€to€Campbell's€truck,€and€left€the€neighborhood.Ìà àAn€autopsy€was€performed€on€the€victim's€body.€€It€revealed€that€the€projectileÏfired€from€Moore's€gun€penetrated€the€victim's€skull€and€passed€completely€through€hisÏbrain.€€There€was€stippling€of€the€skin€around€the€point€where€the€projectile€penetratedÏthe€skull.€€This€meant€that€Moore€was€holding€the€handgun€very€close€to€the€victim'sÏhead€when€he€fired€the€fatal€shot.€€The€œvictim›€died€the€following€day€as€a€result€of€theÏgunshot€wound.Ìà àWhen€Moore€and€McGary€entered€the€house,€Campbell€returned€to€his€truckÏand€drove€to€the€intersection€of€Afternoon€Lane,€where€the€Bean€residence€wasÏlocated,€and€Trout€Valley.€€He€pulled€to€the€curb€and€left€the€motor€running.€€TwoÏpeople€who€lived€near€the€intersection€saw€the€pickup€truck.€€One€witness€said€it€wasÏoccupied€by€an€African„American.€€Both€witnesses€described€the€truck€as€being€anÏolder€model.€€One€witness€thought€it€was€a€General€Motors€product,€but€he€did€notÏknow€the€make€of€the€truck.€€Photographs€of€the€pickup€truck€were€shown€to€theÏwitnesses.€€Both€witnesses€said€the€pickup€truck€depicted€in€the€photographs€wasÍconsistent€with€the€pickup€truck€that€was€stopped€at€the€intersection.€€Later,€one€of€theÏwitnesses€saw€two€African„Americans€run€to€the€pickup€truck.€€These€individuals€gotÏinside€the€pickup€truck€and€the€truck€drove€away.Ìà àThe€state€established€that€a€pickup€matching€the€description€given€by€the€twoÏwitnesses€was€registered€to€Campbell.€€The€license€plate€on€the€pickup€truck€depictedÏin€the€photographs€matched€the€license€plate€registered€to€Campbell.Ìà àà à€€ÌÓ  Óò òI.ó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àCampbell€filed€a€pleading€entitled€"Motion€to€Compel€the€State€to€Turn€OverÏPrior€Statements€of€Codefendant€Prior€to€Trial."€€The€statement€sought€was€"the€thirty„five€(35)€page€type€written€statement€of€the€codefendant,€Lontina€McGary€as€well€asÏthe€tape€recording€of€the€said€statement.€.€.€."€€The€motion€states€in€part:ÌÓÓÌÒ ¸ ÒÒ  ÒYour€defendant€would€further€show€that€the€defendant'sÏconstitutional€rights€as€set€forth€in€the€Sixth€Amendment€of€Ïthe€Constitution€of€the€United€States€guaranteeing€his(sic)Ïthe€right€to€effective€assistance€of€counsel€would€be€violatedÏif€defense€counsel€was€(sic)€not€furnished€with€theÏcodefendant's€statement€prior€to€trial.ÌÌÌÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓÓWhen€defense€counsel€argued€this€motion,€he€predicated€his€argument€on€the€denialÏof€the€effective€assistance€of€counsel€theory.€€He€subsequently€œstated:€›€œð ðThis›€is€not€aÏRule„16€issue.€€And€I€want€the€record€to€be€clear,€this€is€a€[S]ixth€[A]mendment€right€toÏeffective€assistance€of€counsel.€.€.€."Ìà àIn€the€motion€for€a€new€trial,€the€issues€pertaining€to€receipt€of€McGary'sÍstatement€prior€to€trial€œare›€based€on€the€theory€that€the€statement€constitutedÏexculpatory€evidence€within€the€meaning€of€òòBrady€v.€Marylandóó,€373€U.S.€83,€83€S.Ct.Ï1194,€10€L.Ed.2d€215€(1963).€€He€further€contends€that€the€statement€wasÏdiscoverable€before€trial€pursuant€to€Rule€16,€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€€The€appellant€arguesÏthe€exculpatory€evidence€theory€in€his€brief.€€€Ìà àThis€issue€is€waived.€€First,€the€appellant€does€not€tell€this€Court€in€the€argumentÏportion€of€the€brief€where€the€motion€can€be€found€in€the€technical€record,€where€theÏargument€can€be€found€in€support€of€the€motion,€where€the€state€suppressed€thisÏstatement€or€how€he€was€prejudiced€by€the€failure€to€receive€this€statement€prior€toÏtrial.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€27(a)(7)€and€(g);€€Tenn.€Ct.€Crim.€App.€R.€10(b);€€òòState€v.ÏKillebrewóó,€760€S.W.2d€228,€233„34€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1988);€ÏòòState€v.€Smithóó,€735€S.W.2d€859,€862€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).€€Second,€the€appellantÏchanged€his€theory€regarding€the€statement€in€mid„stream.€€As€noted,€the€motion€wasÏbased€on€the€Sixth€Amendment€right€to€the€effective€œassistance€of›€counsel,€and€theÏargument€made€in€support€of€the€motion€was€also€predicated€on€the€Sixth€AmendmentÏright€to€counsel.€€The€first€argument€€asserting€a€due€process€right€appears€in€theÏmotion€for€a€new€trial.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Matthewsóó,€805€S.W.2d€776,€781€(Tenn.€Crim.ÏApp.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1990);€€òòState€v.€Aucoinóó,€756€S.W.2d€705,€€715€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.€1988),€òòcertóó.€òòdeniedóó,€489€U.S.€1084,€109€S.Ct.€1541,€103€L.Ed.2d€845Ï(1989);€€òòState€v.€Dobbinsóó,€754€S.W.2d€637,€641€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóóÏ(Tenn.€1988).€€Finally,€the€appellant€has€not€included€the€statement€in€the€appellateÏrecord€for€this€Court€to€review.Ìà àThis€Court€parenthetically€notes€that€if€this€issue€œwere€addressed›€on€the€merits,ÍCampbell€would€not€be€entitled€to€relief.€€The€state€furnished€defense€counsel€with€aÏcopy€of€the€statement€after€McGary€testified,€and€defense€counsel€used€the€statementÏto€cross„examine€McGary.€€In€essence,€he€received€the€maximum€benefit€from€theÏstatement.€€This€was€the€only€manner€in€which€this€statement€could€be€used.€ÏCampbell€fails€to€establish€how€he€was€prejudiced€by€not€receiving€the€statement€priorÏto€trial.€€This€Court€finds€no€prejudice.Ìà àCampbell€was€not€entitled€to€McGary's€statement€prior€to€trial€pursuant€to€RuleÏ16,€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€€McGary€entered€a€plea€of€guilty.€€Moore€was€tried€separately.€ÏMoreover,€McGary€was€not€a€co„defendant€as€that€term€is€used€in€Rule€16.€€It€appearsÏthat€McGary€and€Moore€were€indicted€jointly.€€The€indictment€in€this€case€only€namesÏCampbell.Ìà àRule€16(a)(1)(A),€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.,€provides€in€part:€€"Upon€a€determination€byÏthe€ÌState€to€place€co„defendants€on€trial€jointly,€the€State€shall€promptly€furnish€eachÏdefendant€who€has€moved€for€discovery€under€this€subdivision€will€all€informationÏdiscoverable€under€this€subdivision€as€to€each€co„defendant."€€Based€upon€the€facts€inÏthis€case,€Campbell€was€clearly€not€entitled€to€McGary's€statement€prior€to€trial.Ìà àThis€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÓ  Óò òII.ó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àCampbell€contends€that€the€trial€court€"erred€when€[it]€denied€Defendant's€pre„trial€motion€to€dismiss€because€of€the€denial€of€his€right€to€speedy€trial€as€well€as€hisÏpre„trial€motion€for€the€prosecution€to€produce€McGary's€29„page€statement."€€ThisÍissue€has€not€been€briefed.€€He€states€that€he€"has€sufficiently€presented€the€case€lawÏin€support€of€this€ground€in€his€discussion€of€the€first€ground€for€a€new€trial."Ìà àThis€issue€cannot€be€considered€by€the€Court.€€First,€the€record€is€insufficient€forÏthis€Court€to€review€this€issue.€€The€record€contains€a€motion€to€dismiss€forÏpreaccusation€delay.€€Campbell€contends€in€the€motion€that€the€twenty€(20)€monthsÏbetween€the€killing€of€the€victim€and€the€return€of€the€indictment€against€him€resulted€inÏprejudice€to€his€defense.€€The€minutes€of€the€trial€court€reflect€that€the€trial€court€tookÏthe€motion€under€advisement,€but€the€record€does€not€reflect€that€the€trial€court€ruledÏupon€the€merits€of€the€motion.€€The€hearing€on€this€motion€was€not€included€in€theÏrecord.€€The€record€is€not€sufficient€for€appellate€review€of€this€issue.€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.ÏBanesóó,€874€S.W.2d€73,€82€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1994);€ÏòòState€v.€Robertsóó,€755€S.W.2d€833,€836€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.Ï1988).€€Also,€this€issue€has€not€been€briefed.€€There€is€no€authority€cited€and€there€areÏno€references€to€where€these€events€can€be€found€in€the€record.€€òòSeeóó€òòKillebrewóó,€760ÏS.W.2d€at€231„32;€€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€735€S.W.2d€at€862;€òòState€v.€Arnoldóó,€719€S.W.2dÏ543,€550€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1986).Ìà àThis€Court€parenthetically€notes€that€if€this€issue€was€considered€on€the€merits,ÏCampbell€would€not€be€entitled€to€relief.€€Preaccusation€delay€is€treated€differently€thanÏdelay€occurring€after€an€indictment€or€presentment€has€been€returned€by€the€grandÏjury.€€òòSeeóó€òòUnited€States€v.€Marionóó,€404€U.S.€307,€92€S.Ct.€455,€30€L.Ed.2d€468€(1971);€ÏòòState€v.€Grayóó,€œ917›€S.W.2d€œ668›€(Tenn.€1996).ÌÌÓ  Óò òÇIII.ó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àCampbell€contends€that€the€trial€court€committed€error€of€prejudicial€dimensionsÏin€denying€"Defense€Counsel's€oral€motion€for€court€(sic)€to€suppress€admission€of€aÏblue€truck."€€The€argument€in€support€of€this€issue€is€disjointed,€fragmented,€and,€quiteÏfrankly,€incomprehensible.€€The€argument€vacillates€between€discussions€of€the€truck,Ïthe€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€and€the€admissibility€of€photographs.Ìà àA€trial€objection€to€the€introduction€of€evidence€is€a€far€cry€from€a€motion€toÏsuppress€evidence.€€The€purpose€of€a€motion€to€suppress€evidence€is€to€prevent€theÏstate€from€introducing€evidence€that€was€obtained€by€violating€a€constitutional€right€ofÏthe€accused.€€If€this€Court€was€to€address€the€issue€as€the€denial€of€a€motion€toÏsuppress,€the€issue€would€be€summarily€denied.€€A€motion€to€suppress€as€to€the€truckÏwas€not€filed€prior€to€trial.€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€12(f).€€The€motions€to€suppress€that€wereÏfiled€do€not€conform€to€Rule€47,€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.,€and€did€not€warrant€an€evidentiaryÏhearing.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Burtonóó,€751€S.W.2d€440,€445€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.Ïòòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1988).Ìà àThe€only€issue€this€Court€can€discern€from€the€appellantððs€argument€is€anÏobjection€based€on€a€lack€of€foundation€for€entering€the€photograph€of€the€truck€intoÏevidence.€€This€Court€finds€that€the€proper€predicate€was€laid€for€the€introduction€of€theÏphotographs€depicting€Campbell's€pickup€truck.€€Two€disinterested€witnesses€wereÏshown€photographs€of€an€older,€blue€pickup€truck.€€Both€witnesses€testified€that€theÏtruck€was€consistent€with€the€truck€they€saw€at€the€intersection€of€Afternoon€Lane€andÏTrout€Valley€on€the€date€in€question.€€One€witness€testified€that€an€African„AmericanÍwas€sitting€in€the€truck.€€Both€witnesses€saw€two€individuals€running€from€the€directionÏof€the€situs€of€the€killing,€get€into€the€truck,€and€the€truck€drive€away.€€One€of€theÏwitnesses€stated€these€two€individuals€were€also€African„Americans.€€The€state€alsoÏintroduced€the€registration€of€the€pickup€truck€into€evidence.€€It€was€registered€toÏGeorge€Campbell,€Jr.,€the€appellant€in€this€proceeding.Ìà àIt€has€long€been€established€that€the€admission€of€photographs€rests€within€theÏsound€discretion€of€the€trial€court.€€òòState€v.€Van€Tranóó,€864€S.W.2d€465,€477€(Tenn.Ï1993),€òòcertóó€òòdeniedóó,€_____€U.S.€____,€114€S.Ct.€1577,€128€L.Ed.2d€220€(1994);€€òòStateÏv.€Bowersóó,€744€S.W.2d€588,€590€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.Ï1988).€€An€appellate€court€will€not€interfere€with€the€exercise€of€this€discretion€absentÏclear€abuse€on€the€face€of€the€record.€€òòVan€Tranóó,€864€S.W.2d€at€477;€òòState€v.€Barnardóó,Ï899€S.W.2d€617,€623€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1994).€€The€trial€courtÏdid€not€abuse€its€discretion€by€permitting€the€state€to€introduce€the€photographs€intoÏevidence.€€The€photographs€of€the€pickup€truck€were€highly€relevant,€and€the€probativeÏvalue€of€the€photographs€far€outweighed€any€danger€of€unfair€prejudice.€€Tenn.€R.ÏEvid.€403;€òòState€v.€Banksóó,€564€S.W.2d€947,€951€(Tenn.€1978).Ìà àThis€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÌÓ  Óò òIV.ó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àCampbell€contends€that€the€trial€court€committed€error€of€prejudicial€dimensionÏby€denying€his€motion€for€judgment€of€acquittal€because€the€evidence€introduced€byÏthe€state€was€insufficient,€as€a€matter€of€law,€to€support€a€conviction€for€felony€murderÍor€aggravated€assault.€€The€argument€in€support€of€this€issue€does€not€tell€us€whetherÏhe€is€addressing€the€motion€for€judgment€of€acquittal€made€at€the€conclusion€of€theÏstate's€case€in€chief€or€post„trial.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€29.Ìà àThis€issue€has€been€waived.€€The€brief€does€not€tell€this€Court€where€the€factsÏrecited€in€the€argument€supporting€the€issue€can€be€found.€€Nevertheless,€this€CourtÏwill€consider€the€issue€on€the€merits.Ìà àA€motion€for€judgment€of€acquittal€raises€a€question€of€law€for€the€determinationÏof€the€trial€court.€€òòState€v.€Adamsóó,€916€S.W.2d€471,€473€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995);€òòStateÏv.€Hallóó,€656€S.W.2d€60,€61€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1983).€€InÏresolving€this€question,€the€trial€court's€only€concern€is€the€legal€sufficiency€of€theÏevidence.€€òòHallóó,€656€S.W.2d€at€61.€€The€trial€court€is€not€permitted€to€weigh€theÏevidence€in€reaching€its€determination.€€òòAdamsóó,€916€S.W.2d€at€473.Ìà àIn€determining€whether€the€evidence€is€sufficient€to€sustain€a€conviction,€the€trialÏcourt€must€consider€the€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€State€of€Tennessee.€ÏòòState€v.€Thompsonóó,€549€S.W.2d€943,€946€(Tenn.€1977);€òòAdamsóó,€916€S.W.2d€at€473;€ÏòòHallóó,€656€S.W.2d€at€61;€òòState€v.€Stoweóó,€634€S.W.2d€674,€675€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1982).€ÏIn€addition,€the€trial€court€must€afford€the€State€of€Tennessee€all€reasonable€andÏlegitimate€inferences€that€may€be€drawn€from€the€evidence€adduced€in€favor€of€theÏstate's€theory.€€òòThompsonóó,€549€S.W.2d€at€946;€€òòHallóó,€656€S.W.2d€at€61;€€òòStoweóó,€634ÏS.W.2d€at€675.€€The€trial€court€must€also€disregard€any€countervailing€evidence€thatÏthe€accused€may€have€introduced€during€the€trial.€€As€this€Court€said€in€òòState€v.€Hallóó:€Ï"[I]f€.€.€.€there€is€any€dispute€as€to€any€material€determinative€evidence,€or€any€doubt€asÏto€the€conclusion€to€be€drawn€from€the€evidence€of€the€State,€the€trial€judge€should€.€.€.Íoverrule€the€motion.€.€.€."€€656€S.W.2d€at€61.Ìà àOn€appeal,€this€Court€must€apply€the€same€standard€as€the€trial€court€whenÏresolving€issues€predicated€upon€the€grant€or€denial€of€a€motion€for€judgment€ofÏacquittal.€€œòòAdamsóó,›€916€S.W.2d€at€473.€€This€Court€will€now€resolve€this€issue€basedÏupon€the€foregoing€legal€principles.Ìà àThere€is€ample€evidence€contained€in€the€evidence€to€support€a€conviction€forÏfelony€murder€and€aggravated€assault.€€Campbell,€as€an€aider€and€abettor€of€theseÏcrimes,€is€just€as€guilty€as€Moore€and€McGary.€€The€only€real€bone€of€contention€isÏwhether€the€testimony€given€by€McGary,€an€accomplice,€was€sufficiently€corroborated.€ÏThis€Court€is€of€the€opinion€that€McGary's€testimony€was€sufficiently€corroborated.Ìà àThe€witnesses€saw€the€appellant's€pickup€truck€sitting€at€the€intersection€ofÏAfternoon€Lane€and€Trout€Valley€with€the€motor€running.€€A€witness€described€theÏpickup€truck€as€an€œold,›€blue€truck.€€Campbell's€truck€was€in€fact€an€old,€blue€pickupÏtruck.€€Another€witness€could€tell€that€an€œAfrican„American€was€operating€the€pickupÏtruck.€€Campbell€is€an€African„American.€€The€two€witnesses€testified€that€the€pickupÏtruck€was€consistent€with€the€truck€that€they€saw€on€the€evening€in€question.€€OneÏwitness€saw€two€people€running€from€the€situs€of€the€murder€and€get€inside€the€pickupÏtruck.€€The€witnesses€said€the€two€people€running€were€African„Americans.€€BothÏMoore€and€McGary€are€African„Americans.€€The€state€introduced€the€registration€forÏthe€license€number€affixed€to€the€pickup€truck.€€The€registration€stated€that€it€was€anÏolder€blue€truck,€and€it€was€registered€to€George€Campbell,€Jr.,€the€appellant.Ìà àThis€evidence€was€more€than€sufficient€to€corroborate€McGary's€testimony.€ÏThese€facts€coupled€with€McGary's€testimony€are€sufficient€to€support€Campbell'sÍconvictions€for€felony€murder€and€aggravated€assault€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.Ìà àThis€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà à________________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à€€€€JOE€B.€JONES,€JUDGEÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ________________________________________Ìà à€€JOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌ__________________________________________Ìà à€JOHN€K.€BYERS,€SENIOR€JUDGE€€€€€€€€