ÿWPCM( …# VU:a %› 0Û¡w@| 4¼ Ð 0ß 0Dþ 1mB 0d¯  0J 0Te 0^¹ 0h 0r 0|ñ 0†m 0ó 1uƒU,ø 0d$ BˆU,¥U*ÑB)ûDC$ AMgÍ´ D3n´v~" 0@ vÓà 0³ 0ŠB 0 Ì 0´l! 0Ç " 0Ûç" 0ïÂ# AO±$Æ% 0÷Æ% 0D½' D/( B0(˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 ,c½¬AZ‹"Arial RegularX(³%ü$¡¡Ñ  ÑÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal[  AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ LegalTÑÒ4°ÒÒh°ÒÑ7€IµXXdìXXdì7Ñ ™šD› œžDŸ &e¡¢Uo„p3|x(Ï(3¤$¤¤Ý ƒ%ü!ÝÑ  ÑÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÒ4°ÒÒh°ÒÑ7€zþXXdædæ7ÑÝ  Ýà Œ àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó tuvwxyz#,37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)(<1$´´Ô2Ô6.Ú  Ú0Ú  ÚÔ3  Ôà0  à2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ d< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d&&&&7Border 1dd€-'Cþÿ << Gÿÿ ÃÝ ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€%ÔÑ  ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÒ 4 ÒÒ h ÒÑ#€d#ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€%ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€%XÔÌÌFebruaryÏ29,Ï1996ÌÌCecilÏW.ÏCrowsonÌAppellateÏCourtÏClerkÔ  Ôó ó""""'ÿÿdxd dÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€%ÔÑ  ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÒ 4 ÒÒ h ÒÑ#€d#ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  Ý€€Ô€%ôÔIn€Dickson€County€case€number€CR„1355€the€defendant€was€convicted€of€possession€ofÏcocaine€and€diazepam€for€resale€occurring€on€October€8,€1993,€and€received€an€effective€sentence€ofÏeight€years€suspended€after€the€service€of€sixty€days.€€Ô€%XÔÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'@("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  ÒStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA: T Monaco ÒÒ  BA: T Monaco Ò(gfi$µµà0  àÔ2(ÆÔ6.Ú  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ú  Ú0Ú  ÚÔ3  Ôà0` (#(#à(bÕä$¶¶à0  àà0` (#(#àÔ2ˆAÔÚ  ÚÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0¸ ` (#` (#à(xâr$··à0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àÔ2ˆAÔ(Ú  Ú0Ú  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0¸ (#¸ (#à(ŒU$¸¸à0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àÔ2ˆAÔ(Ú  ÚaÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0h(#(#à(Ÿ@Æ$¹¹à0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àà0h(#(#àÔ2ˆAÔ(Ú  ÚÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0Àh(#h(#à(³ýt$ººà0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àà0h(#(#àà0Àh(#h(#àÔ2ˆAÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0À(#À(#à(Çñû$»»à0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àà0h(#(#àà0Àh(#h(#àà0À(#À(#àÔ2ˆAÔÚ  ÚaÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0p(#(#à€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(Ï3þd$¢¢Ý ƒ%ü!ÝÑ  ÑÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal[  AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ LegalTÑÒ4°ÒÒh°ÒÑ7€zþXXdæXXdæ7ÑÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÓ&€$$X„d&ÓÑ#€$$Xd#ÑÔ€%ÔÑ  ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÒ 4 ÒÒ h ÒÑ#€Xd#ÑÑ#€Xd#ÑÝ  ÝÙ€€ÙÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÑ Ü ÑÓ` °‚X˜XÓ›ßL€()';+'h|` ´- `€€Lßà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINALÏAPPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌà@ àAT€NASHVILLEÌÌà@ àDECEMBER€SESSION€1995ÌÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à àNo.€œ01C01›„9506„CC„00164Ìà àAppellee,à àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à àHickmanÏCountyÌà àà àà àà àà à)Ìv.à àà àà àà àà à)à àHon.ÏCornelia€A.€Clark,€JudgeÌà àà àà àà àà à)à àà àà àà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà à)à à(SimpleÏPossession€of€Cocaine)ÌTHOMAS€EDWARD€CAPPS,à àà à)à àÌà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌà àAppellant.à àà àà à)ÌÌÌÌÌòòFor€the€Appellant:à àà àà àà àà àFor€theÏAppellee:à àÌà àà àóóÌJohn€H.€Hendersonà àà àà àà àà àCharles€W.ÏBursonÌAssistant€District€Public€Defenderà àà àAttorneyÏGeneral€of€TennesseeÌ407€C€Main€Street€à àà àà àà àà àà àandÌP.O.€Box€68à àà àà àà àà àà àSarah€M.ÏBranchÌFranklin,€TN€37065„0068à àà àà àà à450€JamesÏRobertson€ParkwayÌà àà àà àà àà àà àNashville,ÏTN€37243„0485ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àJoseph€D.€Baugh,€Jr.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àandÌà àà àà àà àà àà àDonald€SchwendimannÌà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà à481€East€Main€StreetÌà àà àà àà àà àà àHohenwald,€TN€38462ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€ÌÌÌóóAFFIRMEDÌòòÌÌóóJoseph€M.€TiptonÌJudge€ÌÌÌà@ àò òòòO€P€I€N€I€O€Nó óóóÌÌÓÓÌà àThe€defendant,€Thomas€Edward€Capps,€appeals€from€his€convictions€inÏthe€Circuit€Court€of€Hickman€County€for€three€counts€of€simple€possession€of€cocaine.€ÏHe€received€sentences€of€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€for€each€offense€withÏtwo€sentences€to€be€served€concurrently€with€one€another€but€consecutively€to€theÏthird.€€All€three€sentences€were€ordered€to€be€served€consecutively€to€a€priorÍunserved€sentence€in€Dickson€County.€€In€this€appeal€as€of€right,€the€defendantÏcontends€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€ordering€two€of€the€sentences€to€be€servedÏconsecutively€to€the€third,€by€ordering€the€sentences€to€be€served€consecutively€to€theÏDickson€County€sentence€and€by€denying€him€probation€for€the€present€offenses.à àÌÌà àIn€case€number€94„5017CR,€the€defendant€entered€guilty€pleas€to€twoÏcounts€of€simple€possession€of€cocaine€for€offenses€committed€on€January€13,€1994Ïand€October€8,€1993,€respectively.€€In€case€number€94„5093CRB,€the€defendantÏentered€a€guilty€plea€for€simple€possession€of€cocaine€for€an€offense€committed€onÏMay€5,€1994.€€At€the€sentencing€hearing€held€on€January€11,€1995,€the€trial€courtÏsentenced€the€defendant€to€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€to€be€served€atÏseventy„five€percent€for€each€offense.€€The€trial€court€ordered€the€sentences€in€caseÏnumber€94„5017CR€to€be€served€concurrently€with€one€another€but€consecutively€toÏthe€sentence€in€case€number€94„5093CRB€based€upon€its€finding€that€the€defendantÏwas€a€professional€criminal€who€devoted€himself€to€criminal€acts€as€a€major€source€ofÏhis€livelihood€and€an€extensive€criminal€history.€€òòSeeóó€T.C.A.€ðð€40„35„115(b)(1)€andÏ(2).€€It€ordered€the€sentences€to€be€served€consecutively€to€the€defendantððs€priorÏunserved€sentence€from€Dickson€County.€€The€trial€court€denied€probation€because€ofÏits€doubts€about€the€defendantððs€truthfulness€at€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€need€toÏavoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense,€the€need€to€deter€drug€offenses€inÏthe€community€and€its€belief€that€the€defendant€was€not€subject€to€rehabilitation.€€€€ÌÌà àAppellate€review€of€sentencing€is€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€on€the€record€with€aÏpresumption€that€the€trial€courtððs€determinations€are€correct.€€T.C.A.€ðððð€40„35„401(d)Ïand€„402(d).€€As€the€Sentencing€Commission€Comments€to€these€sections€note,€theÏburden€is€now€on€the€appealing€party€to€show€that€the€sentencing€was€improper.€€ThisÏmeans€that€if€the€trial€court€followed€the€statutory€sentencing€procedure,€madeÏfindings€of€fact€that€are€adequately€supported€in€the€record,€and€gave€dueÏconsideration€and€proper€weight€to€the€factors€and€principles€that€are€relevant€toÏsentencing€under€the€1989€Sentencing€Act,€we€may€not€disturb€the€sentence.€€òòState€v.ÏFletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€In€fact,€the€weight€to€be€givenÏany€applicable€sentencing€factor€is€left€to€the€discretion€of€the€trial€court.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.ÏSheltonóó,€854€S.W.2d€116,€123€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1992);€T.C.A.€ðð€40„35„210,ÏSentencing€Commission€Comments.ÌÌà àRelative€to€the€trial€courtððs€finding€that€the€defendant€has€an€extensiveÏrecord€of€criminal€activity€to€justify€the€imposition€of€consecutive€sentences,€theÏpresentence€report€reflects€that€the€defendant€has€two€prior€convictions€forÏbootlegging€whiskey€that€date€back€to€1963€and€1970.€€Otherwise,€the€defendantððsÏprior€record€consists€only€of€the€Dickson€County€conviction€for€which€he€was€on€bailÍwhen€two€of€the€present€offenses€were€committed.× ƒ+ ××  ×€€In€addition€to€these€priorÏconvictions,€the€trial€court€considered€the€defendantððs€taped€statements€made€to€aÏconfidential€informant€regarding€his€extensive€dealings€in€drugs.€€The€record€supportsÏthe€trial€courtððs€finding€of€extensive€criminal€activity.Ì€€Ìà àRelative€to€the€trial€courtððs€finding€that€the€defendant€was€a€professionalÏcriminal,€in€a€taped€conversation€that€was€played€for€the€trial€court,€the€defendant€toldÏa€confidential€informant€that€he€had€a€lot€of€people€to€supply€cocaine€to€and€that€heÏalways€kept€a€little€on€hand.€€He€also€told€the€informant€that€six€hundred€dollars€andÏsome€cocaine€had€been€stolen€from€his€home.€€At€the€sentencing€hearing,€theÏdefendant€claimed€that€his€only€source€of€income€was€monthly€social€security€benefitsÏof€approximately€five€hundred€dollars;€yet,€when€arrested€in€Dickson€County,€he€hadÏseven€hundred€dollars€in€his€pocket.€€After€the€Dickson€County€arrest,€the€defendantÏagreed€to€a€search€of€his€home€in€Hickman€County.€€Sergeant€Stuart€Goodwin€of€theÏDickson€County€Sheriffððs€Department€Vice/Narcotics€Division€testified€that€during€theÏsearch,€the€defendant€received€four€telephone€calls€from€individuals€wanting€to€buyÏdrugs.€€The€defendant€also€offered€ambiguous€explanations€of€a€deposit€slip€forÏtwenty€thousand€dollars€that€was€recovered€during€a€search.€€These€facts€adequatelyÏsupport€the€trial€courtððs€finding€that€the€defendant€is€a€professional€criminal.Ì€€Ìà àRegarding€the€Hickman€County€sentences€being€served€consecutivelyÏto€the€Dickson€sentences,€we€note€that€œ›œ›Rule€32(c)(2),€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.,€givesÏdiscretion€to€the€trial€court€to€impose€consecutive€sentences€when€a€defendant€hasÏ"additional€sentences€not€yet€fully€served."€€This€court€has€previously€held€that€theÏexercise€of€discretion€under€Rule€32(c)(2)€essentially€involves€the€consideration€of€theÏconsecutive€sentencing€criteria€provided€in€T.C.A.€ðð€40„35„115(b).€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€LarryÏG.€Hartóó,€No.€92C01„9406„CC„0001,€Hardin€Co.€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€June€28,€1995),Ïòòopinion€on€pet.€for€reh'góó€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€July€26,€1995);€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòState€v.€William€R.ÏWaters,€Jr.óó,€No.€01C01„9404„CR„00145,€Davidson€Co.€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€Dec.€22,Ï1994),€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€May€1,€1995).€€In€this€respect,€the€trial€court's€conclusionsÏthat€the€defendant€has€an€extensive€record€of€criminal€activity€and€is€a€professionalÏcriminal€are€applicable.€€Finally,€we€believe€that€the€defendant's€criminal€history,Ïincluding€his€commission€of€offenses€while€released€on€bail€for€other€offenses,Ïwarrants€the€conclusion€that€the€consecutive€sentences€the€defendant€received€areÏnecessary€to€protect€the€public€from€him€and€reasonably€reflect€the€severity€of€hisÏrepeated€commission€of€drug€offenses.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Wilkersonóó,€905€S.W.2d€933Ï(Tenn.€1995).€€ÌÌà àRelative€to€the€trial€courtððs€denial€of€probation,€a€defendant€who€isÏeligible€for€probation€has€the€burden€of€establishing€suitability€for€probation.€€As€theÍSentencing€Commission€Comments€to€T.C.A.€ðð€40„35„303(b)€state,€althoughÏð ðprobation€must€be€automatically€considered€as€a€sentencing€option€for€eligibleÏdefendants,€the€defendant€is€not€automatically€entitled€to€probation€as€a€matter€ofÏlaw.ðð€€òòSeeóó€òòFletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€at€787.€€However,€as€the€defendant€does€not€meet€theÏdescription€of€one€who€should€be€given€first€priority€regarding€a€sentence€involvingÏincarceration€under€T.C.A.€ðð€40„35„102(5),€and€has€been€convicted€of€misdemeanors,Ïhe€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€probation€in€the€absence€of€evidenceÏto€the€contrary.€€ÌÌà àThe€defendant€committed€one€of€the€offenses€in€case€number€94„5017CR€while€on€bail€for€the€Dickson€County€offense.€€Later,€he€committed€theÏoffense€in€case€number€94„5093CRB€while€on€bail€for€the€earlier€Hickman€CountyÏoffenses.€€The€defendantððs€repeated€involvement€with€cocaine,€even€while€on€bail,Ïreflects€unfavorably€on€his€chances€for€rehabilitation.€€The€trial€court€found€significantÏthat€the€defendant€admitted€to€possessing€cocaine€in€the€presentence€report€but€at€theÏsentencing€hearing,€changed€his€account€of€the€events€and€stated€that€he€did€notÏdeliver€any€cocaine.€€Such€a€lack€of€candor€may€be€a€major€factor€for€denyingÏprobation.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Dykesóó,€803€S.W.2d€250€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1990);€òòState€v.ÏJenkinsóó,€733€S.W.2d€528€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).€€We€hold€that€the€trial€court€did€notÏerr€in€denying€probation€under€these€circumstances.ÌÌÇà àIn€consideration€of€the€foregoing€and€the€record€as€a€whole,€theÏjudgments€of€conviction€are€affirmed.ÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà àòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌà àà àà àà àà àà àJoseph€M.€Tipton,€JudgeÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌJoe€B.€Jones,€Presiding€JudgeÌÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌPaul€G.€Summers,€JudgeÌÌ€€€€€€