ÿWPC%% …# VUNa %¯ 0(µw@Ý4 1 U.@ 0†n 0Dô 0J8 ‚ 0TŠ 0^Þ 0h< 0r¤ 0| 0†’ 0 1u¨ 0d BU>žB)ÜDC AMHë•l€ D3ìÐ v~ï 0@mvÓ­ AO€#ÆÏ# 0D•$ D/Ù$ B%˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLlÎ(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡ rsDtDuvDwxUyUzD{Ó€Úƒç"3|x†%ä2¼A`ArialTT(6(2Ä$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ d< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d%%%%7Border 1dd€-&Cþÿ << Gÿÿ áÝ ƒ!ÝÔ€$ÔÝ  ÝÔ€ ÔÔ€ ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€ XÔÌÌò òAugust€12,€1997ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó bÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€$ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÓ  Óà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  Ý€Smith€was€acquitted€of€the€manufacture€of€marijuana€and€possession€of€drugÏparaphernalia.€€However,€the€jury€found€him€guilty€of€possession€of€marijuana€and€evadingÏarrest.Ì""""'ÿÿdxd Æ Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€$ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÓ  Óà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  Ý€Defendantððs€counsel€in€his€brief€made€a€poignant,€pointed,€persuasive€plea€to€thisÏCourt€relating€to€the€staleness€of€these€prior€convictions.€€He€writes:ÌÌà8 àà àTo€put€these€prior€convictions€into€historical€perspective,€appellantÏwould€once€again€review€for€this€Court€the€facts.€€In€1960,€Dwight€DavidÏEisenhower€was€still€President€of€the€United€States.€€Hawaii€had€beenÏadmitted€to€Statehood€less€than€a€year€before.€€A€U„2€spy€plane€piloted€byÏFrancis€Gary€Powers€was€shot€down€over€the€Soviet€Union€creatingÏpolitical€controversy,€and€at€the€tender€age€of€seventeen,€while€still€a€minor,ÏHoyt€Carroll€was€arrested€for€public€intoxication.€€By€1965,€John€F.ÏKennedy€had€served€three€years€of€his€presidency,€only€to€be€felled€by€anÏassassins€bullet.€€Camelot€was€over,€and€Lyndon€Johnson€had€won€his€ownÏterm€as€president.€€Martin€Luther€King€marched€on€Montgomery,€Alabama.€Ïð ðWestyððs€Warðð€escalated€when€the€new€American€army€commander€inÏVietnam,€General€William€C.€Westmoreland,€requested€and€got€the€firstÏinstallment€of€combat€troops.€€Oh,€and€Hoyt€Carroll€was€arrested€andÏconvicted€of€his€second€public€intoxication€charge.€€Three€years€later,€inÏ1968,€Walter€Cronkite,€commenting€on€the€Tet€Offensive,€confided€to€hisÏtelevision€audience€that€he€no€longer€believed€the€Vietnam€war€wasÏwinnable.€€Lyndon€Johnson€announced€he€would€not€seek€another€term€asÏpresident.€€In€Tennessee,€Martin€Luther€King€was€assassinated€in€Memphis,Ïand€Hoyt€Carroll€was€convicted€for€the€third€time€in€eight€years€of€publicÏintoxication.€€He€was€now€twenty„five€years€old.€€Hoyt€Carroll,€who€hasÏnever€in€his€life€been€charged€or€convicted€of€a€drug€offense,€never€againÏwas€charged€or€convicted€of€an€alcohol€related€offense.€€Counsel€for€theÏAppellant€was€four€years€old€when€last€the€Appellant€was€convicted€ofÏPublic€Drunkenness€more€than€twenty„eight€years€ago€.€.€.ÌÌAs€interesting€and€accurate€as€this€historical€analysis€may€be,€it€unfortunately€was€of€onlyÏmarginal€benefit€in€our€determination€as€to€whether€the€defendant€had€a€ð ðprevious€history€ofÏcriminal€convictions.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1).€€We,€nevertheless,€some€fiveÏyears€after€defendantððs€most€recent€conviction,€commend€counsel€(whom€we€assume€to€beÏapproximately€32€years€of€age)€for€his€zealous€advocacy.€€ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'h("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  ÒStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€$ÔÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÙ€€ÙÓ  ÓÔ€ ÔÑ\R AØ'\ÑßR€'(&A1-j|` Å `€€@ÿRß›Þ ÞÌà@ àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌà@ àAT€KNOXVILLEÌÌà@ àAPRIL€1997€SESSIONÌÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,ó óà@ à)Ìà@ à)à àò òNO.€03C01„9607„CC„00254ó óÌà àAppellee,à@ à)Ìà@ à)à àò òHAWKINS€COUNTYó óÌò òVS.ó óà@ à)Ìà@ à)à àò òHon.€James€E.€Beckner,ÏJudgeÌHOYT€EDWARD€CARROLL,ó óà@ à)Ìà@ à)à à(Manufacture€of€Marijuana€andÌà àAppellant.à@ à)à àPossession€of€DrugÏParaphernalia)ÌÌÌÌò òòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à àà àà àà àòòFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:ÌÌGREG€W.€EICHELMANà àà àà àà àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPó óÌDistrict€Public€Defenderà àà àà àà àAttorney€General€and€ReporterÌÌò òR.€RUSSELL€MATTOCKSà àà àà àCLINTON€J.€MORGANó óÌAssistant€District€Public€Defenderà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌ1609€College€Park€Drive,€Box€11à àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌMorristown,€TN€37813„1618à àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àò òC.€BERKELEY€BELL,€JR.ó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àò òG.€DOUGLAS€GODBEEó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€AttorneyÏGeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àHawkins€County€CourthouseÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àRogersville,€TN€37857ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àò òMICHELLE€GREENó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€AttorneyÏGeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àGreene€County€CourthouseÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àGreeneville,€TN€37743ÌÌÌÌò òOPINION€FILED:€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌÌÌÌAFFIRMED€AS€MODIFIEDÌÌÌÌJOE€G.€RILEY,ÌJUDGEÇÑ7€ÅXXdìXXdì7ÑÓÓà@ àòòOPINIONóóó óÌÌà àThe€defendant,€Hoyt€Edward€Carroll,€was€indicted€on€one€(1)€count€of€theÏmanufacture€of€more€than€one„half€(ðð)€ounce€but€less€than€ten€(10)€pounds€ofÏmarijuana,€one€(1)€count€of€possession€of€drug€paraphernalia,€and€one€(1)Ïcount€of€€evading€arrest.€€A€Hawkins€County€jury€convicted€him€of€theÏmanufacture€of€marijuana€and€possession€of€drug€paraphernalia.€€The€trial€courtÏsentenced€him€to€two€(2)€years€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction€forÏthe€manufacture€of€marijuana,€and€eleven€(11)€months€and€€29€days€in€theÏcounty€jail€for€the€possession€of€drug€paraphernalia.€€The€sentences€wereÏordered€to€run€concurrently.€€On€appeal,€he€contends€that€the€evidence€wasÏinsufficient€to€sustain€his€convictions,€his€sentences€are€excessive,€and€the€trialÏcourt€erred€in€denying€alternative€sentencing.€€We€€AFFIRM€€his€convictions,€but€ÏMODIFY€€his€misdemeanor€sentence.ÌÌà@ àò òòòFACTSó óóóÌÌà àThe€stateððs€proof€at€trial€showed€that€the€Hawkins€County€SheriffððsÏDepartment€had€information€that€some€marijuana€was€growing€in€a€field€nearÏWar€Creek€Road€in€Hawkins€County.€€On€July€26,€1995,€four€officers€with€theÏsheriffððs€department€began€a€surveillance€operation€in€that€area.€€The€officersÏsearched€the€area€and€found€approximately€sixty€(60)€marijuana€plants€growingÏin€the€field.€€Almost€every€plant€had€a€green€string€attached€so€that€the€plant€wasÍtied€down.€€At€the€base€of€each€plant€was€at€least€one€green€bottle€containing€aÏliquid€substance€which€smelled€like€ammonia.Ìà àThe€officers€then€set€up€their€video€equipment.€€œEventually›€two€men,€laterÏdetermined€to€be€the€defendant€and€co„defendant,€Rick€Coy€Smith,€approachedÏthe€plants.Ìà àOfficer€Gerald€Gibson€testified€that€he€saw€the€men€observing€a€plant€andÏð ðpicking€around€on€it€.€.€€and€one€of€them,€at€one€point,€even€took€the€bottle€.€.€.€Ïthat€was€sitting€there€and€dashed€something€around,€like€he€was€pouringÏsomething€around€in€the€roots.ðð€€One€of€the€men€pulled€leaves€off€of€the€plantÏand€put€them€in€a€white€bag.Ìà àAfter€several€minutes€passed,€the€officers€came€out€from€hiding€andÏidentified€themselves.€€Defendant€submitted€to€the€officersðð€requests,€but€hisÏcompanion€tried€to€run€away€from€the€officers.€€One€of€the€officers€was€able€toÏstop€Smith€before€he€left€in€his€truck.Ìà àSubsequently,€the€men€were€arrested€and€searched.€€Defendant€hadÏseveral€green€strings€in€his€front€pocket,€and€a€marijuana€leaf€was€foundÏbetween€his€shoe€and€sock.€€The€white€bag€containing€marijuana€leaves€wasÏfound€after€Smith€dropped€it€in€his€attempt€to€evade€arrest.€€The€officers€alsoÏsearched€Smithððs€truck€and€found€three€bottles€containing€ammonia.Ìà àDetective€Joel€Hunt€testified€that€when€he€arrived€at€the€scene,€heÏrequested€that€the€officers€pull€the€plants.€€The€leaves€were€stripped€from€theÏplants€and€those€leaves,€along€with€those€in€the€white€bag,€were€tested€andÏfound€to€be€marijuana.€€He€further€testified€that€ammonia€is€a€fertilizer.Ìà àDefendant€testified€on€his€own€behalf.€€He€stated€that€he€had€been€in€theÏarea€picking€blackberries€when€he€noticed€some€plants€with€green€strings€onÏthem.€€He€took€some€strings€off€of€one€of€the€plants€and€put€the€strings€in€hisÏtruck.€€He€testified€that€he€told€Smith€that€he€had€found€some€marijuana€andÏshowed€him€the€strings.€€Smith€wanted€to€get€some€marijuana€for€his€own€use,Ïso€defendant€agreed€to€show€him€where€the€plants€were.Ìà àDefendant€and€Smith€proceeded€to€the€area€where€he€found€the€plants.€ÏSmith€began€collecting€the€marijuana.€€Defendant€claimed€that€he€was€merelyÏlooking€at€the€plants€when€the€officers€identified€themselves.Ìà àThe€jury€convicted€œdefendant›€of€the€manufacture€of€marijuana€andÏpossession€of€drug€paraphernalia.× ƒ) ××  ×€€The€trial€court€sentenced€him€as€a€Range€I,ÏStandard€Offender,€to€two€(2)€years€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€CorrectionÏfor€the€manufacture€of€marijuana,€a€Class€E€felony,€and€eleven€(11)€months€and€Ï29€days€in€the€county€jail€for€the€possession€of€drug€paraphernalia,€a€Class€AÏmisdemeanor.ÌÌà@ àòòò òSUFFICIENCY€OF€THE€EVIDENCEóóó óÌÌà àIn€his€first€argument,€defendant€contends€that€the€evidence€wasÏinsufficient€to€sustain€the€verdicts€of€guilt€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€HeÏclaims€that€there€is€no€evidence€that€he€did€anything€more€than€examine€œa›€plant.€ÍTherefore,€he€argues€that€the€evidence€against€him€is€merely€circumstantial€andÏinsufficient€to€sustain€the€juryððs€verdict.Ìà àGreat€weight€is€given€to€the€result€reached€by€the€jury€in€a€criminal€trial.€€AÏjury€verdict€accredits€the€stateððs€witnesses€and€resolves€all€conflicts€in€favor€ofÏthe€state.€€òòState€v.€Bigbeeóó,€885€S.W.2d€797,€803€(Tenn.€1994);€òòState€v.€Harrisóó,Ï839€S.W.2d€54,€75€(Tenn.1992).€€Questions€concerning€the€credibility€of€theÏwitnesses,€the€weight€and€value€to€be€given€the€evidence€as€well€as€all€factualÏissues€raised€by€the€evidence,€are€resolved€by€the€trier€of€fact,€not€this€court.€ÏòòState€v.€Tuttleóó,€914€S.W.2d€926,€932€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€€On€appeal,€theÏstate€is€entitled€to€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€and€allÏreasonable€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€therefrom.€€òòBigbeeóó,€885€S.W.2d€atÏ803;€òòHarrisóó,€839€S.W.2d€at€75;€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.Ï1978).Ìà àMoreover,€a€guilty€verdict€removes€the€presumption€of€innocence€whichÏthe€defendant€enjoyed€at€trial€and€raises€a€presumption€of€guilt€on€appeal.€ÏòòState€v.€Graceóó,€493€S.W.2d€474,€476€(Tenn.€1973).€€The€defendant€has€theÏburden€of€overcoming€this€presumption€of€guilt.€€òòIdóó.Ìà àIn€the€present€case,€defendant€and€Smith€were€found€in€a€remote€areaÏexamining€a€marijuana€plant.€They€immediately€began€tending€to€the€plant€byÏpouring€fertilizer€on€it€and€tying€the€plant.€€Defendant€was€carrying€green€stringsÏlike€those€that€were€used€to€tie€the€plants€down.Ìà àAlthough€the€evidence€of€his€guilt€is€circumstantial€in€nature,Ïcircumstantial€evidence€alone€may€be€sufficient€to€support€a€conviction.€€òòState€v.ÍTharpeóó,€726€S.W.2d€896,€899„900€(Tenn.€1987);€€òòState€v.€Gregoryóó,€862€S.W.2dÏ574,€577€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993);€òòState€v.€Buttreyóó,€756€S.W.2d€718,€721€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.€1988).€€Therefore,€we€find€that€the€evidence€was€sufficient€for€aÏreasonable€trier€of€fact€to€find€defendant€guilty€of€both€offenses.€€This€issue€isÏwithout€merit.ÌÌà@ àò òòòSENTENCINGó óóóÌÌà@ àò òA.ó óÌà àIn€his€second€and€final€assignment€of€error,€defendant€argues€that€hisÏsentences€are€excessive.€€He€claims€that€the€trial€court€misapplied€twoÏenhancement€factors€and€did€not€give€enough€weight€to€the€only€mitigatingÏfactor.€€He€further€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€some€form€ofÏalternative€sentencing.€€As€a€result,€he€claims€that€his€sentences€should€beÏreduced.Ìà@ àò òB.ó óÌà àWe€first€note€that€the€trial€judge€in€announcing€the€sentence€forÏmanufacturing€marijuana€imposed€a€ð ðdeterminate€sentence€of€two€(2)€years.ðð€ÏThe€trial€judge€further€stated€that€ð ðprobation€and€community€corrections€andÏalternative€sentencing€should€be€denied.€.€.ðð€€Yet,€the€judgment€itself€shows€aÏtwo€(2)€year€sentence€to€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction€with€theÏfollowing€notation:€€ð ðSplit€confinement€365€days€in€jail.ðð€€There€is€no€indication€ofÏthe€length€of€probation€after€serving€the€365€days.Ìà àWhen€there€is€a€conflict€between€the€court€minutes€or€judgment€and€theÏtranscript,€the€transcript€controls.€€òòState€v.€Mooreóó,€814€S.W.2d€381,€383€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.€1991);€òòState€v.€Davisóó,€706€S.W.2d€96,€97€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1985).€ÏTherefore,€we€assume€the€imposed€sentence€to€be€two€(2)€years€in€theÏDepartment€of€Correction.€€We€also€believe€this€to€be€the€sentence€intended€byÏthe€trial€court.€€The€judgment€shall€be€modified€to€delete€the€reference€to€ð ðSplitÏconfinement€365€days€in€jail.ððÌà@ àò òC.ó óÌà àThis€Courtððs€review€of€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€is€òòde€novoóóÏwith€a€presumption€of€correctness.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€ThisÏpresumption€is€conditioned€upon€an€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€theÏtrial€judge€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€andÏcircumstances.€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€The€burdenÏis€upon€the€appealing€party€to€show€that€the€sentence€is€improper.€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€40„35„401(d)€Sentencing€Commission€Comments.Ìà àAt€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€found€that€two€enhancementÏfactors€applied:€(1)€the€defendant€had€a€previous€history€of€criminal€convictions;Ïand€(2)€the€defendant€was€the€leader€in€the€commission€of€an€offense€involvingÏtwo€or€more€actors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1)€and€(2).€€In€mitigation,€theÏtrial€court€found€that€defendantððs€criminal€conduct€neither€caused€norÏthreatened€serious€bodily€injury€but€gave€it€little€or€no€weight.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ïðð€40„35„113(1).€€The€trial€court€then€sentenced€defendant€to€the€maximumÏsentence€for€both€offenses.Ìà àIf€no€mitigating€or€enhancing€factors€for€sentencing€are€present,€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(c)€provides€that€the€presumptive€sentence€shall€be€theÏminimum€sentence€within€the€applicable€range.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805ÏS.W.2d€785,€788€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€However,€if€such€factors€do€exist,€aÏtrial€court€should€start€at€the€minimum€sentence,€enhance€the€minimumÏsentence€within€the€range€for€aggravating€factors€and€then€reduce€the€sentenceÏwithin€the€range€for€the€mitigating€factors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(e).€€NoÏparticular€weight€for€each€factor€is€prescribed€by€the€statute,€as€the€weight€givenÏto€each€factor€is€left€to€the€discretion€of€the€trial€court€as€long€as€its€findings€areÏsupported€by€the€record.€€òòState€v.€Mossóó,€727€S.W.2d€229,€237€(Tenn.€1986);ÏòòState€v.€Santiagoóó,€914€S.W.2d€116,€125€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995);€òòseeóó€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210€Sentencing€Commission€Comments.Ìà àDefendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erroneously€found€that€he€had€aÏprevious€history€of€criminal€convictions.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1).€€ÏDefendant€has€two€(2)€prior€convictions€for€driving€on€a€suspended€license,€aÏconviction€for€contempt€of€court,€a€conviction€for€disorderly€conduct€and€three€(3)Ïconvictions€for€public€drunkenness.€€His€most€recent€conviction€was€in€1991,€butÏmany€of€his€€convictions€date€back€over€twenty€years€prior€to€his€sentencing€onÏthe€present€case.œ× ƒ+ ××  ×›€€The€fact€that€defendantððs€prior€record€consists€of€oldÍmisdemeanor€convictions€does€not€mean€that€this€factor€does€not€apply.€€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1)€does€not€require€the€prior€convictions€to€be€recentÏconvictions€or€felony€convictions.€€œòòSeeó󛀜òòState€v.€Maurice€Garneróó,€C.C.A.€No.Ï02C01„9508„CR„00223€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€filed€May€19,€1997,€at€Jackson);ÏòòState›€v.€William€D.€Pewittóó,€C.C.A.€No.€01C01„9411„CC„00375€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ïfiled€August€22,€1996,€at€Nashville);€òòState€v.€Jerome€Dixonóó,€C.C.A.€No.€02C01„9508„CC„00247€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€filed€July€26,€1996,€at€Jackson).€€The€trialÏcourt€properly€applied€this€enhancement€factor.Ìà àDefendant€also€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€applying€as€anÏenhancement€factor€that€he€was€the€leader€in€the€commission€of€an€offenseÏinvolving€two€or€more€actors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(2).€€Although€SmithÍwas€acquitted€of€manufacturing€marijuana,€he€was€convicted€of€the€lesserÏoffense€of€simple€possession€of€marijuana.€€The€jury€obviously€concluded€theÏdefendant€was€the€actual€grower,€and€Smith€was€there€to€assist€defendant.€€ThisÏenhancement€factor€was€properly€applied.Ìà àDefendant€further€complains€of€the€trial€courtððs€finding€that€the€onlyÏmitigating€factor€applicable€was€entitled€to€little€or€no€weight.€€As€a€mitigatingÏfactor,€the€trial€court€considered€that€defendantððs€conduct€neither€caused€norÏthreatened€serious€bodily€injury.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(1).€€However,Ïthe€trial€court€gave€the€mitigating€factor€little,€if€any,€weight.€€In€a€case€involvingÏdrugs,€this€mitigating€factor€is€generally€entitled€to€little€weight.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.ÏMarlos€Mannóó,€C.C.A.€No.€02C01„9504„CC„00101€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€filed€Oct.Ï18,€1995,€at€Jackson).€€The€trial€court€did€not€abuse€its€discretion€in€giving€thisÏfactor€little€value.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Mossóó,€727€S.W.2d€at€237;€òòState€v.€Santiagoóó,€914ÏS.W.2d€at€125.Ìà àWe€conclude€the€two„year€sentence€for€manufacturing€marijuana€was€anÏappropriate€sentence.€€However,€fairness€dictates€that€the€misdemeanorÏsentence€of€eleven€(11)€months,€29€days€be€modified.€€Defendant€will€beÏeligible€for€release€on€the€two„year€felony€sentence€upon€reaching€his€releaseÏeligibility€date.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„501(a)(3).€€Yet,€it€is€conceivable€thatÏdefendant€at€that€time€would€not€be€eligible€for€release€on€the€misdemeanorÏsentence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„302.€€The€misdemeanor€sentence€isÏmodified€to€six€(6)€months.Ì̛̜à@ àò òòòALTERNATIVE€SENTENCINGó óóóÌÌà àUnder€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989,€trial€judges€areÏencouraged€to€use€alternatives€to€incarceration.€€An€especially€mitigated€orÏstandard€offender€convicted€of€a€Class€C,€D€or€E€felony€is€presumed€to€be€aÏfavorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing€options€in€the€absence€ofÏevidence€to€the€contrary.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(6).Ìà àIn€determining€if€incarceration€is€appropriate,€a€trial€court€may€considerÏthe€need€to€protect€society€by€restraining€a€defendant€having€a€long€history€ofÏcriminal€conduct,€the€need€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense,Ïwhether€confinement€is€particularly€appropriate€to€effectively€deter€others€likelyÏsimilar€to€commit€similar€offenses,€and€whether€less€restrictive€measures€haveÏoften€or€recently€been€unsuccessfully€applied€to€the€defendant.€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€40„35„103(1);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€œat›€œ169;›€òòState€v.ÏMillsapsóó,€920€S.W.2d€267,€œ271›€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).Ìà àA€court€may€also€consider€the€mitigating€and€enhancing€factors€€set€forthÏin€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113€and€114€as€they€are€relevant€to€the€ðð€40„35„103€considerations.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(b)(5);€òòState€v.€Bostonóó,€938ÏS.W.2d€435,€438€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€€Additionally,€a€court€should€considerÏthe€defendantððs€potential€or€lack€of€potential€for€rehabilitation€when€determiningÏif€an€alternative€sentence€would€be€appropriate.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(5);€òòState€v.€Bostonóó,€938€S.W.2d€at€438.Ìà àIn€determining€whether€to€grant€or€deny€probation,€a€trial€court€shouldÏconsider€the€circumstances€of€the€offense,€the€defendant's€criminal€record,€theÏdefendantððs€social€history€and€present€condition,€the€need€for€deterrence,€andÏthe€best€interest€of€the€defendant€and€€the€public.€€òòState€v.€Grearóó,€568€S.W.2dÏ285,€286€(Tenn.€1978);€òòState€v.€Boydóó,€925€S.W.2d€237,€244€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ï1995);€òòState€v.€Blackóó,€924€S.W.2d€912,€917€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).Ìà àThere€is€no€mathematical€equation€to€be€utilized€in€determiningÏsentencing€alternatives.€€Not€only€should€the€sentence€fit€the€offense,€but€itÏshould€fit€the€offender€as€well.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(2);€òòState€v.€Boggsóó,Ï932€S.W.2d€467€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€€Indeed,€individualized€punishment€isÏthe€essence€of€alternative€sentencing.€€òòState€v.€Dowdyóó,€894€S.W.2d€301,€305Ï(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994).€€In€summary,€sentencing€must€be€determined€on€aÏcase„by„case€basis,€tailoring€each€sentence€to€that€particular€defendant€basedÏupon€the€facts€of€that€case€and€the€circumstances€of€that€defendant.€€òòState€v.ÏMossóó,€727€S.W.2d€at€235.Ìà àIn€the€present€case,€we€find€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€denyingÏalternative€sentencing.€€Defendant€was€untruthful€in€his€trial€testimony€and€didÏnot€accept€responsibility€for€his€actions.€€The€defendant's€lack€of€credibility€is€anÏappropriate€consideration€and€reflects€on€a€defendant's€potential€forÏrehabilitation.€€òòState€v.€Chestnutóó,€643€S.W.2d€343,€353€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1982).€ÏAlso,€as€noted€by€the€trial€court,€incarceration€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciatingÏthe€seriousness€of€the€offense€and€to€serve€as€a€œdeterrent.›€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Dykesóó,Ï803€S.W.2d€250,€260€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1990).€The€trial€court€properly€deniedÍalterative€sentencing.ÌÌà@ àò òòòCONCLUSIONóóó óÌÌà àIn€conclusion,€we€find€that€there€is€sufficient€evidence€for€a€reasonableÏtrier€of€fact€to€find€defendant€guilty€of€the€manufacture€of€marijuana€andÏpossession€of€drug€paraphernalia.€€Furthermore,€the€sentences€imposed€by€theÏtrial€court€are€appropriate,€except€that€the€felony€judgment€shall€be€modified€toÏdelete€the€reference€to€ð ðSplit€confinement€365€days€in€jailðð€and€theÏmisdemeanor€judgment€shall€be€modified€to€reflect€a€sentence€of€six€(6)€months.€ÏAccordingly,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court,€as€modified.ÌÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà àà àòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àò òJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGEÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌœòòÌÌÌ›€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌJERRY€L.€SMITH,€JUDGEÌÌÌœòòÌÌÌ›€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌCHRIS€CRAFT,€SPECIAL€JUDGEó ó