WPCT& k)S]6Q8y)" <ĩ"_ uv7,c: A>IZj?u41$N+5twoZn$2 u` Bdӓش|ml y6BH@M-m?yP^̆[@x4phQ0LuaZ󉠷^sJ.*GR)ׁף! /~Z8{S@i(at+g?a~HuuFrp*$k 5e<+\,_["r~Kz!/VvBri>!{}݈1nA#CMq4yp?F}s:{5/ݱ*y }UF/߾i"Q@MA!;lW~L,Љ$?Qd")nghaFiWD`U.@ %nbt-x~8nH 0(U:% w_ 4c #!w 0 0D1 U :u N  ^ m 1 1] 72 1u 72 f 0c#)f 72 1F B 72 1 72U,fUef 1 72f 1# 72f 1B 72 1 72 1 72A 1s 72! 14! 72!f!fS" 1" 72@#fr#f################### AQ>$$ 0DU% 0D% 0D%% D3!&<6X9`(CourierX  ##Xd#    t    \RA'Legal\3|x<6X9`(CourierXx6X@`7X@($,  AZ"Arial RegulartpO'HP LaserJet 8000 DN PS0(I(2$  !  X9XXX `   0  (#$  0  ,cAZ"Arial RegularR'L U(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(CEKQW]cioAutoList2A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.1.##37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i) \\RA' Legal\(;3$2#  0  .3  0    d$XvXXX `   2    _Contrarytothedefendantstestimony,hiswifestestimonyminimizedher `  culpabilityforandknowledgeofthedefendantscrimes. d$XvXXX `   3    _Thedefendantswifedeniedshewashavinganaffairatthetimeofthe `  defendantscrimes. \\RA' Legal\A.(CEKQW]cioAutoList3A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A. d!A.(CEKQW]cioAutoList4A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.$A.  d$XvXXX `   1    _Accordingtothedefendantswife,shewasthedefendantslegal `  guardianforpurposesofreceivinghisSocialSecuritychecks.Apparently,the F  SocialSecurityAdministrationhaddeterminedthatthedefendantwasunableto ,  managehisownfunds.The_presentence_ԀreportrevealsthattheSocialSecurity   paymentswereformentaldisability.Thedefendanthasafamilyandpersonal   historyofmentalillness.Thedefendanthasalsostruggledwithalcoholanddrug  ~ abuse.,  AZArial  \\RA' Legal\ K [#"  X9XXX XX9  _  Ad FILEDJ   October18,1999Cecil_Crowson_,Jr.AppellateCourt_ClerkdAx _   d$XvXXX `   4    _Thedefendantarguesinhisbriefthatthetrialcourtfound, `  inappropriately,thathewas aprofessionalcriminalwhohasknowinglydevoted F  [his]lifetocriminalactsasamajorsourceoflivelihood.SeeTenn.CodeAnn. ,  4035115(b)(1)(1997).Althoughthecourtcommentedthatthedefendantwas    anoffenderwhoserecordofcriminalactivityisextensive,weviewthis   commentaspartofitsrationaleinfindingthedefendantadangerousoffender.  ~ Inanyevent,evenifthecourthadmadeaninappropriatefindingofprofessional d criminality,consecutivesentencingisindependentlysupportedbecausethe J defendantisadangerousoffender,asdiscussedbelow. \\RA' Legal\(uhCEKQW]cioAutoList51.1.1.1.1.1.1.1..1. \\RA' Legal\(ڽCEKQW]cioAutoList6A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.2A. \\RA' Legal\(hCEKQW]cioAutoList71.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.61.(CEMU]emu}AutoList8(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)9(1)(hCEKQW]cioAutoList91.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.;1.(GEGOW_gowAutoList10(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)=(1)(:EGMSY_ekqAutoList11A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.?A. \\RA' Legal\ \\RA' Legal\(EGMSY_ekqAutoList121.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.C1. \\RA' Legal\ \\RA' Legal\Z[\]_C<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3#$  !  (3#$  !  ($$   1  """"'dxd  !  _`   TR[A'Legal3'A' Legal3'T X9XXX _vY)_@0,j: `@Ef tt` \v__@ INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE `  ̀@=='ATKNOXVILLE 8  @"SEPTEMBER1999SESSION     STATEOFTENNESSEE, h     ) N  `     h     ) `  Appellee, h     ) p C.C.A.No.03C019903CC00104    `     h     )vs. `     h     ) p CockeCounty x  L   `     h     ) CARYCARLCAUGHRON,    ) p Hon.RexHenryOgle,Judge      `     h     )   0 ` 0 ` (#` (#  Appellant.     ) p (4cts.FelonyMurder, (# (#  `     h     )0 p AggravatedArson,pp(#p(#  `     h      p AttemptedFirstDegreeMurder) FORTHEAPPELLANT: h      p FORTHEAPPELLEE: " EDWARDCANTRELLMILLER     p PAULG.SUMMERS  n DistrictPublicDefender h      p AttorneyGeneral&Reporter Z  SUSANNALAWSTHOMAS      p GEORGIABLYTHEFELNER  & Asst.DistrictPublicDefender     p CounselfortheState   102MimsAve.0  0h(#(#     p 425FifthAve.North h(#h(# Newport,TN378213614  h      p 2dFloor,CordellHullBldg. !~  `     h      p Nashville,TN372430493 `     h      p ALFREDG.SCHMUTZER  $0  `     h      p DistrictAttorneyGeneral |%  `     h      p 125CourtAve.,Rm.301E `     h      p Sevierville,TN37862   H'!  `     h     OPINIONFILED:________________ AFFIRMEDJAMESCURWOODWITT,JR.,JUDGE  N1',  8&XXdd8     TR[A'Legal[A'Legal A' Legal A' LegalT   _TR[A' Legal[A'Legal A' Legal A' LegalT8 <0 XXdXXd8† †(† -†0†5†A†B†E†F†  @qq* OPINION  `   `  Thedefendant,CaryCarlCaughron,isbeforethiscourtforthethird @  timeforhisconvictionsoffourcountsoffelonymurder,onecountofaggravated   arson,andonecountofattemptedfirstdegreemurder.Hereceivedhisconvictions  atajurytrialintheCockeCountyCircuitCourt,andthejurysetthepunishmentfor  eachofthemurderconvictionsatlifeimprisonment.Thereafter,thetrialcourt `  imposed25yearsentencesforaggravatedarsonandattemptedfirstdegree @  murder.Thecourtorderedthelifesentenceseachservedconsecutivelytoeach   other,butconcurrentlytotheaggravatedarsonandattemptedfirstdegreemurder ` convictions.Thedefendantappealed,andweaffirmedtheconvictionsbutmodified @ theimpositionofconsecutivesentencingtoconcurrentserviceofallsixsentences.   SeeStatev.CaryCaughron,No.03C019310CR00181(Tenn.Crim.App.,  Knoxville,Sept.20,1994)(CaughronI).Thereafter,thesupremecourtgranted  applicationtoappealforthepurposeofremandingthecasetothiscourtfor !` reconsiderationinlightofStatev.Wilkerson,905S.W.2d933(Tenn.1995) #@ (consecutivesentencing).Onremand,wefoundtherecorddevoidofthenecessary %  findingsforreconsiderationofconsecutivesentencingunderWilkerson.SeeState `'  v.CaryCaughron,No.03C019310CR00181(Tenn.Crim.App.,Knoxville,Jan. @)" 26,1996)(CaughronII).Therefore,weremandedthemattertothetrialcourt,which  +!$ conductedahearing,madefindings,andimposedthelifesentencesconsecutively -#& toeachotherandconcurrentlytotheothertwosentences.Itisfromthis .%( determinationthatthedefendantnowappeals.Uponreviewoftherecord,the 0`'* briefsoftheparties,andtheapplicablelaw,weaffirm. 2@),  `  Thefactsofthiscasearedivulgedindetailinthiscourtsfirstopinion. `6-0 SeeCaughronI,slipop.at24.Briefly,thedefendantsetfiretoabuildingwhich @8.2 containedseveralapartmentsbecauseoneofthetenantshadtakenaknifefrom  :04 him,andhehadbeenunabletogetthewomantoreturntheknife.Fourindividuals `  perishedinthefire. @   `  Attheresentencinghearing,thetrialcourtreceivedanupdated  presentencereportandheardthetestimonyofthedefendantandhiswife.Both  testifiedabouttheeventsofthenightoftheoffenses.Thedefendantclaimedhe `  hadbeenunableforseveralyearstorecalltheeventsofthenightinquestion; @  however,afterhestoppedtakingmedicationandseeingpsychiatriccaregivers   aboutthreeyearsago,hismemorystartedtoreturn.& #  1      ׀Heclaimedthathedidnot ` intendtoharmanyone;heonlywantedtoscarethewomanwhotookhisknife.He @ testifiedheandhiswifebrokeintothebuildingandknockedonalltheapartment   doors,butnooneanswered.Theythentriedtoborrowashotgunfroman  acquaintance,buttheywereunsuccessful.Theywenthome,andthedefendant  siphonedsomegasolinefromoneoftheirvehicles.Thedefendantswifedrovehim !` totheapartmentbuilding;hewentinsideandpouredthegasdowninthehallway #@ andstartedthefire.Theyleftthescenebutreturnedlater,andthedefendantwas %  arrested. #  2      ׀Thedefendantclaimedhiswifecouldhavestoppedhimthatnight. `'  However,hebelievesshemayhavemanipulatedhimthatnightsohewouldend @)" upinprisonandshecouldbewithherallegedlover.n  #  3        +!$ _ -#& 'X<0XX X<0 `  Inthisappeal,thedefendantquestionswhetherthetrialcourtproperly `  imposedconsecutivesentencesforeachofthefelonymurderconvictions.# X<0XX'X<0>'#XvXX X<0When @  thereisachallengetothelength,range,ormannerofserviceofasentence,itis $  thedutyofthiscourttoconductadenovoreviewoftherecordwithapresumption  thatthedeterminationsmadebythetrialcourtarecorrect.Tenn.CodeAnn.40 ` 35401(d)(1997).Thispresumptionis conditionedupontheaffirmativeshowing ,  intherecordthatthetrialcourtconsideredthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevant X  factsandcircumstances.Statev._Ashby_,823S.W.2d166,169(Tenn.1991). $   Theburdenofshowingthatthesentenceisimproperisupontheappellant.Id.  Intheeventtherecordfailstodemonstratetherequiredconsiderationbythetrial \ court,reviewofthesentenceispurelydenovo.Id.Ifappellatereviewreflectsthe ( trialcourtproperlyconsideredallrelevantfactorsanditsfindingsoffactare X adequatelysupportedbytherecord,thiscourtmustaffirmthesentence, evenifwe $ wouldhavepreferredadifferentresult.Statev.Fletcher,805S.W.2d785,789   (Tenn._Crim_.App.1991). "\  `  Inthepresentcase,thetrialcourtconsideredtheproperfactorsand T&  madeappropriatelysupportedfactualfindingsontherecord.Thus,ourreviewis  (" denovowiththepresumptionofcorrectness. ) $ # X<0XXXv?(#'X<0XX X<0 `  Consecutivesentencingmaybeimposedinthediscretionofthetrial -<$( courtuponadeterminationthatoneormoreofthefollowingcriteriaexist: |/&* ` (1)0 Thedefendantisaprofessionalcriminalwhohasknowingly \1', devotedhimselftocriminalactsasamajorsourceof L2(- livelihood;<3).  (2)0 Thedefendantisanoffenderwhoserecordofcriminalactivity 5+0 isextensive; 6,1  (3)0 Thedefendantisadangerousmentallyabnormalpersonso 7.3 declaredbyacompetentpsychiatristwhoconcludesasa 8|/4  0 resultofaninvestigationpriortosentencingthatthe `  defendant'scriminalconducthasbeencharacterizedbya P  patternofrepetitiveorcompulsivebehaviorwithheedless @  indifferencetoconsequences;0   (4)0 Thedefendantisadangerousoffenderwhosebehavior  indicateslittleornoregardforhumanlife,andnohesitation  aboutcommittingacrimeinwhichtherisktohumanlifeis  high;  (5)0 Thedefendantisconvictedoftwo(2)ormorestatutory `  offensesinvolvingsexualabuseofaminorwithconsideration P  oftheaggravatingcircumstancesarisingfromtherelationship @  betweenthedefendantandvictimorvictims,thetimespanof 0  defendant'sundetectedsexualactivity,thenatureandscope   ofthesexualactsandtheextentoftheresidual,physicaland p mentaldamagetothevictimorvictims;`  (6)0 Thedefendantissentencedforanoffensecommittedwhileon @ probation;or0  (7)0 Thedefendantissentencedforcriminalcontempt.  ` Tenn.CodeAnn.4035115(b)(1997).InStatev._Wilkerson_,905S.W.2d933,  93738(Tenn.1995),thesupremecourtimposedtwoadditionalrequirementsfor  p consecutivesentencingunderthedangerousoffendercategorythecourtmust "P findconsecutivesentencesarereasonablyrelatedtotheseverityoftheoffenses $0 committedandarenecessarytoprotectthepublicfromfurthercriminalconduct. p& # X<0XX'X<0>/# `  Afterreceivingtheevidence,thetrialcourtfoundthatthedefendant 0* # wasadangerousoffender.+ #  4      ׀SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4025115(b)(4)(1997). ,"% Specifically,thecourtobservedthatthedefendantknewhewascreatingahighrisk -$' tohumanlife,yethechosetoproceed.Further,thecourtfoundthathehadnever /p&) _presidedoveracaseinwhichhumanlifehadbeentakensoneedlessly.Thecourt `  observed, Ifeveracasesupportsthesefactorsin4035115,ifthefactsinthis @  casedontsupportit,thenthereisnopersonwhodeservesconsecutive   sentencing.WithrespecttotheWilkersonfactors,thecourtfoundconsecutive  sentencesreasonablyrelatedtotheseverityoftheoffenseinthatthedefendantset  firetoanoccupiedbuildingona whim.Thecourtexpressed nodoubtthatunder `  similarcircumstancesthedefendantwouldcommitthecrimesagain;accordingly, @  thecourtfoundthatsocietycouldnotbeprotectedfromthedefendantexcept   throughextensiveincarceration. `  `  Upondenovoreviewaccompaniedbythepresumptionofcorrectness,   weconcludethatthetrialcourtsfindingsoffactareadequatelysupportedbythe  record.Moreover,thefindingscomportwiththerequirementsoftheSentencing  ReformActandWilkerson.Thetrialcourtproperlyimposedconsecutivesentences !` forthedefendantsfourfelonymurderconvictions. #@  `  Insoholding,wehaverejectedthedefendantsargumentthatthe `'  statesfailuretointroduceanyevidenceattheresentencinghearingmandatesa @)" reversal.Thestateintroducedandthecourtreceivedthepresentencereportatthe  +!$ resentencinghearing.Additionally,thecourtproperlyconsideredtheevidence -#& previouslyreceivedbythecourtattrial,aswellastheevidencethedefendant .%( offeredatthehearing,inmakingitsassessment.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035 0`'* 210(b)(Supp.1998). 2@),   :04  `  Weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. `   `     h     ________________________________   `     h     JAMESCURWOODWITT,JR.,JUDGE  CONCUR: `  _______________________________ p GARYR.WADE,PRESIDINGJUDGE ` _______________________________   JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE