ÿWPCœ …# VUHa %© 0(¯×w@ß4 3 0JB 0TŒ 0^à 0h> 0r¦ 0| 0†” 0 1uª U, 0dK U,¯ U6Û U*B);DCd AM§ Bô"v~3vÓ± D3„ 0@· AO÷ÆF 0D  D/P B˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 <à09Z 0Courier (W1) RegularX($¡¡ tuDvwDxyzE{|Ó€†DÒ 3|x†2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(Courier New< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d""""7Border 1dd€-#Cþÿ << Gÿÿ d Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€ ÔÝ  ÝÔ€!ÔÔ€!ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€!XÔÌÌJune€20,€1996ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔ  Ôó óPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHØ(d'`Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Monaco ÒÒ  BA Op Monaco Ò%%%%'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÓ&€X„d&ÓÑ#€Xd#ÑÔ€ ÔÝ  ÝÒ 4 ÒÒ X ÒÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÓÓÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ7€íÎXdÈdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÔ€!Ô›à@ àòòIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEóóÌà@ àòòAT€NASHVILLEóóÌà@ àJANUARY€1996€SESSIONÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà à*à àC.C.A.€#€01C01„9505„CC„00143€Ìà àAppellee,à àà àà à*à àPUTNAM€COUNTYÌVS.à àà àà àà àà à*à àHon.€Leon€Burns,€Jr.,€JudgeÌMICHAEL€œLEON€CHAMBERS,›à àœ*›à à(Motion€to€Withdraw€Guilty€Plea)ÌÙ€€ÙœßL€$&#;+'h|S ` ç `€€Lß›à àAppellant.à àà àà à*ÌÌòòFor€Appellant:óóà àà àà àà àòòFor€Appellee:óóÌÓÓFrank€Buckà àà àà àà àà àCharles€W.€BursonÌBuck€&€Buckà àà àà àà àà àAttorney€General€&ÏReporterÌ124€West€Main€StreetÌSmithville,€TN€€37166à àà àà àCharlotte€H.€RappuhnÌ(on€motion€and€appeal)à àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àCriminal€Justice€DivisionÌH.€Marshall€Juddà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌAsst.€Public€Defenderà àà àà àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493Ì215€Reagan€StreetÌCookeville,€TN€€38501à àà àà àLillie€Ann€SellsÌ(at€guilty€plea)à àà àà àà àAsst.€District€œAttorney›€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà à145€South€Jefferson€AvenueÌà àà àà àà àà àà àCookeville,€TN€€38501ÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€œFILED:€€òò›€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌÌÌGARY€R.€WADE,€JUDGEÇà@ àòòOPINIONóóÌÌÓÓà àà àThe€defendant,€Michael€œLeon€Chambers,›€entered€a€plea€of€guilt€toÏtheft€over€$10,000.00.€€Thereafter,€the€trial€court€denied€a€motion€to€withdraw€theÏplea.€€In€this€appeal,€the€defendant€claims€that€his€plea€was€neither€knowingly€norÏvoluntarily€entered.€€œWe›€disagree€and€thus€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.ÌÌà àà àThe€indictment€by€the€grand€jury€provided€as€follows:€ÌÓÓà8 àà8 à[The€defendant]€did€unlawfully€and€knowingly€obtain€orÏexercise€control€over€property,€to€wit:€(1)€1986Ïconvertible€Mercedes€...€total€...€value€over€...€tenÏthousand€(10,000.00)€Dollars,€belonging€to€FredÏClemons€and€with€intent€to€deprive€the€owner€thereofÏand€without€the€owner's€effective€consent....ÌÌÓÓLater,€the€defendant€waived€his€right€to€a€jury€trial€and€pled€guilty€to€the€chargeÏwithout€the€state€having€made€any€recommendation€as€to€œthe€sentence.›€€The€trialÏcourt€denied€the€defendantððs€request€for€judicial€diversion€and€imposed€a€Range€I,Ïfive„year€sentence.€€The€defendant€was€ordered€to€serve€nine€months€of€theÏsentence€in€the€county€jail€and€was€to€be€granted€intensive€probation€for€theÏremainder€of€his€term.ÌÌà àà àAfter€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€defendant€employed€new€counselÏwho€filed€a€motion€to€withdraw€his€guilty€plea.€€The€trial€court€denied€the€motion,Íruling€that€(1)€the€defendant€pled€guilty€to€theft;€(2)€there€was€no€duty€to€explainÏlesser€included€offenses;€and€(3)€there€was€no€manifest€injustice€by€allowing€theÏplea€to€stand.€€By€subsequent€order,€the€trial€court€held€that€the€defendant€hadÏvoluntarily,€knowingly,€and€understandingly€waived€his€rights,€including€those€toÏtrial€by€jury,€and€that€there€was€an€adequate€factual€basis€for€the€plea.ÌÌà àà àWhether€to€grant€a€motion€to€withdraw€a€guilty€plea€rests€within€theÏsound€discretion€of€the€trial€court.€€òòState€v.€Haynesóó,€696€S.W.2d€26,€29€(Tenn.€Crim.ÏApp.€1985).€€In€order€for€us€to€reverse€the€trial€court's€decision,€the€defendant€mustÏdemonstrate€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€denying€the€motion.€€òòState€v.ÏDavisóó,€823€S.W.2d€217,€220€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€The€withdrawal€of€a€plea€ofÏguilty€is€governed€by€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(f).€€When€the€motion€is€filed€after€theÏimposition€of€sentence,€as€done€here,€the€standard€to€be€applied€is€whether€there€isÏ"manifest€injustice."€€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(f);€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòState€v.€Davisóó,€823€S.W.2d€atÏ219„20.€€Whether€there€has€been€"manifest€injustice"€is€determined€by€the€courts€onÏa€case€by€case€basis.€€òòState€v.€James€Howard€Turneróó,€No.€01C01„9404„CR„00122Ï(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€at€Nashville,€Sept.€20,€1995),€òòperm.óó€òòtoóó€òòappealóó€òòdeniedóó,€(Tenn.Ï1996)(for€publication).€€ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àà àA€œtrial€court€may€permit€the€withdrawal€of€a€plea€›Ïœof€guilty›€to€prevent€"manifest€injustice"€when€it€isÍestablished€that€the€plea€was€entered€due€to€(a)Ï"coercion,€fraud,€duress€or€mistake,"€(b)€"fear,"€(c)€aÏ"gross€misrepresentation"€made€by€the€district€attorneyÏgeneral,€or€an€assistant,€(d)€the€district€attorney€general,Ïor€an€assistant,€withholds€material,€exculpatoryÏevidence,€which€influences€the€entry€of€the€plea,€or€theÏplea€of€guilty€was€not€voluntarily,€understandingly,€orÏknowingly€entered.€€Conversely,€the€trial€court€will€not,Ïas€a€general€rule,€permit€the€withdrawal€of€a€plea€ofÏguilty€to€prevent€"manifest€injustice"€when€the€basis€ofÏthe€relief€is€predicated€upon€(a)€an€accused's€"change€ofÏheart,"€(b)€the€entry€of€the€plea€to€avoid€harsherÏpunishment,€or€(c)€an€œaccusedððs›€dissatisfaction€with€theÏharsh€punishment€imposed€by€the€trial€court€or€a€jury.ÌÌÓÓòòIdóó.,€slip€op.€at€12„13€(footnotes€omitted).€€Our€scope€of€review€is€limited.€€TheÏfindings€of€the€trial€judge€on€questions€of€fact€are€conclusive€on€appeal€unless€theÏevidence€preponderates€against€the€judgment.€€òòClenny€v.€Stateóó,€576€S.W.2d€€12Ï(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1978).€€ÌÌà àà àThe€defendant€argues€that€his€guilty€plea€was€not€knowingly€andÏvoluntarily€made€because€he€was€not€properly€advised€of€the€nature€of€the€charge.€ÏMore€specifically,€he€makes€the€following€assertions:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 à(1)€The€theft€of€property€statute,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„14„103,€requires€a€permanent€intent€to€deprive€an€ownerÏof€his€property;ÌÌà8 àà8 à(2)€because€ðð€39„14„103€requires€a€permanent€intent€toÏdeprive€an€owner€of€his€property,€the€defendant€wasÏnever€apprised€of€the€nature€of€the€charges€against€him;ÌÌà8 àà8 à(3)€because€the€defendant€was€never€apprised€of€theÏnature€of€the€charge€against€him,€his€guilty€plea€wasÏinvoluntary€and€must€be€set€aside;ÌÌà8 àà8 à(4)€the€trial€court's€failure€to€apprise€the€defendant€of€theÏnature€of€the€charge€against€him€and€its€failure€toÏestablish€a€factual€basis€for€his€plea€constitutedÏprejudicial€error;€and€ÌÌà8 àà8 à(5)€alternatively,€the€defendant's€conviction€should€beÏreduced€to€joyriding€and€the€case€remanded€to€criminalÏcourt€for€proper€sentencing.ÌÌÌÌÓÓà àà àWe€will€attempt€to€adequately€address€each€of€these€œassertions.Ì›Ìòòò òœ›à@ àIntent€Required€for€Theft€of€Propertyó óóóÌà àà àTheft€of€property€occurs€when,€"with€intent€to€deprive€the€owner€ofÏproperty,€the€person€knowingly€obtains€or€exercises€control€over€the€propertyÏwithout€the€owner's€effective€consent."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„14„103.€€If€a€personÏtakes€another's€car€without€the€owner's€effective€consent€but€does€not€have€theÏintent€to€deprive€the€owner€of€the€car,€then€the€person€has€only€committed€theÏoffense€of€joyriding.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„14„107.€€Recently,€in€òòState€v.€œBrooksóó,›Ï909€S.W.2d€854,€859„60€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995),€this€court€addressed€the€differentÏintent€requirements€for€theft€and€joyriding€and€whether€an€intent€to€òòpermanentlyóóÍdeprive€the€owner€of€property€is€required€under€the€theft€statute.€€In€making€thisÏdetermination,€the€court€relied€upon€the€statutory€definition€of€"deprive":ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àà à(A)€Withhold€property€from€the€owner€permanentlyÏòòoróó€for€such€a€period€of€time€as€to€substantially€diminishÏthe€value€or€enjoyment€of€the€property€to€the€owner;ÌÌà8 àà8 àà à(B)€Withhold€property€or€cause€it€to€be€withheld€forÏthe€purpose€of€restoring€it€only€upon€payment€of€aÏreward€or€other€compensation;€or€ÌÌà8 àà8 àà à(C)€Dispose€of€property€or€use€it€or€transfer€anyÏinterest€in€it€under€circumstances€that€make€itsÏrestoration€unlikely[.]ÌÌÓÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„106(a)(8)(emphasis€added).€€Under€this€statute,€theÏintent€to€permanently€deprive€an€owner€of€his€property€is€only€one€of€severalÏalternative€definitions€of€"deprive"€which€would€satisfy€the€statutory€definition€forÏtheft€of€property.€€If€permanent€deprivation€was€not€applicable€here,€the€defendantÏmay€have€qualified€under€one€or€more€of€the€other€alternatives.€€ÌÌò òòòà@ àNature€of€the€Chargeóóó óÌà àà à"Adequate€notice€of€the€nature€of€the€charges€is€a€constitutionalÏrequisite€in€any€criminal€prosecution."€€òòBryan€v.€Stateóó,€848€S.W.2d€72,€75€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.€1992);€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòBlankenship€v.€Stateóó,€858€S.W.2d€897,€904€(Tenn.Ï1993);€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€11.€€"[T]here€is[,€however,]€no€constitutional€requirementÍthat€a€trial€court,€in€litany€fashion,€explain€each€element€of€every€offense€to€whichÏan€accused€is€pleading€guilty."€€òòBryan€v.€Stateóó,€848€S.W.2d€at€75.€€Here,€theÏindictment€followed€the€statutory€definition€of€the€offense.€€The€mere€fact€that€termsÏwithin€that€definition€may€also€be€statutorily€defined€elsewhere€does€not€impose€aÏduty€on€the€trial€judge€at€all€guilty€plea€hearings€to€define€each€term€and€phrase€asÏhe€would€for€a€jury.€€In€our€view,€the€defendant€was€sufficiently€advised€that€he€wasÏpleading€guilty€to€the€offense€of€theft€of€an€automobile€over€$10,000.00.€€ÌÌò òòòà@ àVoluntariness€of€Pleaóóó óÌà àà àIn€òòBoykin€v.€Alabamaóó,€395€U.S.€238€(1969),€the€United€StatesÏSupreme€Court€ruled€that€defendants€should€be€advised€of€certain€of€theirÏconstitutional€rights€before€entering€pleas€of€guilt.€€Included€among€those€requiredÏwarnings€are€the€right€against€self„incrimination,€the€right€to€confront€witnesses,Ïand€the€right€to€a€trial€by€jury.€€òòIdóó.€at€243.€€The€overriding€òòBoykinóó€requirement,Ïhowever,€is€that€the€guilty€plea€must€be€knowingly€and€voluntarily€made.€€òòIdóó.€atÏ242„44.€€In€òòState€v.€Mackeyóó,€553€S.W.2d€337€(Tenn.1977),€our€supreme€courtÏestablished€a€procedure€for€trial€courts€to€follow€in€accepting€guilty€pleas.ÌÌà àà àThe€petitioner€asserts€that€he€did€not€understand€what€was€required€toÏcommit€the€offense€and€that€he€did€not€therefore€voluntarily€and€knowingly€enter€hisÍplea.€€We€cannot€agree.ÌÌà àà àThe€record€contains€an€affidavit€by€the€defendant€wherein€it€is€allegedÏthat€his€prior€counsel€never€advised€him€that€a€permanent€intent€to€deprive€isÏrequired€to€substantiate€the€offense.€€Another€affidavit€provides€that€his€priorÏcounsel€acknowledged€that€he€had€not€told€the€defendant€of€the€permanencyÏrequirement.€€The€record,€however,€establishes€that€the€defendant€acknowledgedÏat€the€guilty€plea€hearing€that€he€had,€in€fact,€been€fully€advised€by€his€counsel€ofÏthe€charges€made.€€While€the€defendant€made€statements€that€he€did€not€intend€toÏdamage€the€vehicle,€the€primary€concern€of€the€defendant€at€the€submissionÏhearing€was€in€being€treated€similarly€to€a€codefendant€for€whom€the€state€hadÏagreed€to€recommend€judicial€diversion.€€The€state€had,€however,€opposed€judicialÏdiversion€for€the€defendant.€€The€defendant€may€not€œnow›€seek€to€withdraw€his€pleaÏbecause€he€is€unhappy€with€the€sentence€ultimately€imposed.€€òòSeeóó€òòHenning€v.ÏStateóó,€184€Tenn.€508,€511„13,€201€S.W.2d€669,€670„71€(1947).€€There€is€noÏrequirement€for€equal€sentences€among€codefendants.€€Individual€factors€must€beÏtaken€into€consideration.€€None€of€these€assertions€would€necessarily€establish€thatÏthe€plea€was€not€knowingly€and€voluntarily€entered.ÌÌòòò òà@ àFactual€Basis€for€Plea€and€Reduction€to€Joyridingóóó óÌà àà àThe€defendant€also€claims€that€the€record€does€not€establish€a€factualÏbasis€for€the€plea.€€The€state,€however,€provided€the€œfollowing›€summary€at€theÏsubmission€hearing:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àThese€individuals€stole€a,€I€believe€it€was€a€MercedesÏthat€belonged€to€a€Fred€Clemons€here€in€PutnamÏCounty.€€They€took€it,€they€took€it€out,€left€it,€rode€itÏaround€and€eventually€abandoned€it€down€at€Center€HillÏLake€or€down€below€the€dam,€and€just€ruined€the€carÏbasically,€Your€Honor,€so€that's€what€the€crime€is.ÌÌÓÓThe€defendant€now€attempts€to€argue€that€he€did€not€have€the€requisite€intent€toÏcommit€the€theft€and€therefore€was€guilty€of€joyriding€at€worst.€€While€we€agree€thatÏthe€defendant€may€have€advanced€this€theory€had€the€case€gone€to€trial,€this€doesÏnot€render€as€inadequate€the€factual€basis€for€his€plea.€€These€stipulated€facts€areÏsufficient€to€establish€the€elements€of€the€offense.€€That€the€defendant€"just€ruinedÏthe€car"€would,€for€example,€qualify€as€a€substantial€diminution€of€"the€value€orÏenjoyment€of€the€œproperty."›€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„106(a)(8)(A).€€ÌÌà àà àThus,€we€agree€that€there€was€no€manifest€injustice€which€requiredÏthat€the€guilty€plea€be€set€aside.€€Accordingly,€the€judgment€is€œaffirmed.ÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà à__________________________________›Ìœà àà àà àà àà àà àGary›€R.€Wade,€Judge€ÌœÇCONCUR:›ÌÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Judge€ÌÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌJoseph€M.€Tipton,€Judge€