ÿWPCF2 …UNV %¤U:ªä 0 ôþ w@ 4F 0NZ 0D¨ 1mì 0cY 0J¼ 0T Z 0^` 0h¾ 0r& 0|˜ 0† 0š 1u* 0dŸ BU> U *^B)ˆDC± D3ô AM'—t 0@  K=Ti‘púv~j$vÓè% 0w»+ 0Š2, 0 ¼, 0´\- 0Ç. 0Û×. 0ï²/ AO¡0Æð0 0D¶1 D/ú1 B)2(ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular3|xm(â,A$¡¡Ñ  ÑÔ€Xå6XXXÔÔ€XÛÃXXXå6ÔÑ` °ÑÑܰÑÑÑÑ  ÑÑTRY 3Ø'Letter3Ø' 3Ø' Letterÿ3Ø'TÑÓ  Ó WXHYHZ[\H]^U_Ó€k·‚^!(þ(3ë$¤¤Ý ƒ,A!ÝÑ  ÑÔ€X5XXXÔÔ€XKƒXXX5ÔÑ` °ÑÑܰÑÑÑÑ  ÑÑTRY3Ø'Letter3Ø' 3Ø' Letterÿ3Ø'TÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóótuvwxyz#,37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)(;s˜$´´Ô2,ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  à2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  ÔHÙ2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ d< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d((((7Border 1dd$$$$'ÿÿdxd€-)Cþÿ << Gÿÿ Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€&ÔÑ  ÑÔ€'ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÑ\R3Ø'\ÑÝ  ÝÔ€'ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€'XÔÌÌò òMarch€25,€1997ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€'ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò ÿÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€&ÔÑ  ÑÔ€'ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÑ\R3Ø'\ÑÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ @ ÑÑ\R3Ø'\Ñà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóóà àThe€trial€court€ordered€her€to€serve€a€minimum€of€30%€of€a€oneÏyear€sentence€in€the€Knox€County€facility.Ì 3Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€&ÔÑ  ÑÔ€'ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÑ\R3Ø'\ÑÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ @ ÑÑ\R3Ø'\Ñà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóóà àThe€rule€is€as€follows:Ìà àà àà àc)€€Concurrent€or€Consecutive€Sentences.Ìà àà8 àà à(1)€Multiple€Sentences€From€One€Trial.€€If€theÏdefendant€is€convicted€upon€one€trial€of€more€thanÏone€offense,€the€trial€judge€shall€determine€whetherÏthe€sentences€shall€be€served€concurrently€orÏconsecutively.€€Unless€it€is€made€to€affirmativelyÏappear€that€the€sentences€are€consecutive,€they€shallÏbe€deemed€to€be€concurrent.€€If€the€court€order€thatÏthe€sentence€be€served€consecutively€orÏconcurrently,€the€order€shall€specifically€recite€theÏreasons€for€such€ruling€and€such€judgment€isÏreviewable€on€appeal.ÌÌTenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(c)(1).Ì _Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€&ÔÑ  ÑÔ€'ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÑ\R3Ø'\ÑÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ @ ÑÑ\R3Ø'\Ñà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóóà àThe€fact€that€the€Knox€County€judgments€were€final€is€simplyÏirrelevant.€€If€the€original€order€needed€modification,€our€law€provides€that€a€trialÏcourt€has€the€authority€to€correct€an€illegal€sentence€at€any€time.€€òòState€v.ÏBurkhartóó,€566€S.W.2d€at€873;€òòTaylor€v.€Morganóó,€909€S.W.2d€17,€20(Tenn.€Crim.ÏApp.€1995).€€The€trial€court€in€Knox€County€could€have€corrected€the€judgmentÏorder€any€time€it€received€notice€of€the€Blount€County€sentences.Ì fÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€&ÔÑ  ÑÔ€'ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÑ\R3Ø'\ÑÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ @ ÑÑ\R3Ø'\Ñà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóóà àWe€recognize€that€in€òòState€v.€Burkhartóó,€a€case€involving€a€guiltyÏplea€and€an€illegal€sentence,€the€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€remanded€theÏcase€for€a€hearing€to€determine€whether€the€guilty€plea€was€predicated€onÏconcurrent€sentencing.€566€S.W.2d€at€873.€See€also€òòHenderson€v.€Stateóó,€220ÏTenn.€520,€419€S.W.2d€176,€(Tenn.€1967);€òòState€v.€Clyde€Smithóó,€No.€01C01„9204„CC„00144€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Nashville,€Nov.€18,€1992);€€òòRonald€LeeÏLyons€v.€Stateóó,€No.€01C01„9104„CC„00119€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Nashville,€Oct.Ï10,€1991).€€No€remand€is€necessary€in€this€case.€€Nothing€in€the€records€indicateÏthat€appellantððs€guilty€pleas€were€entered€contingent€upon€concurrentÏsentencing.€€In€fact,€the€record€indicates€that€the€Knox€County€Court€wasÏunaware€of€the€Blount€County€convictions€when€it€entered€judgment.€€Moreover,Ïthe€Knox€County€convictions€are€not€at€issue€in€this€appeal.€€Appellant€disputesÏonly€the€validity€of€the€order€of€the€Blount€County€Court.ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò(OÞ{$µµà0  àÔ2,ÔÚ  ÚaÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0` (#(#à(b²D$¶¶à0  àà0` (#(#àÔ2,ÔÚ  ÚÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0¸ ` (#` (#à(xÓñ$··à0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àÔ2,Ô(Ú  Ú0Ú  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0¸ (#¸ (#à(ŒÆ‚$¸¸à0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àÔ2,Ô(Ú  ÚaÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0h(#(#à(Ÿù…$¹¹à0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àà0h(#(#àÔ2,Ô(Ú  ÚÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0Àh(#h(#à(³¶4$ººà0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àà0h(#(#àà0Àh(#h(#àÔ2,ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0À(#À(#à(Ǫ»$»»à0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àà0h(#(#àà0Àh(#h(#àà0À(#À(#àÔ2,ÔÚ  ÚaÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0p(#(#à€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€&ÔÑ  ÑÔ€'ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÑ\R3Ø'\ÑÝ  Ý›Ò  ÒÒ ° Òò òÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ7€5XXdìdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÞ ÞÌà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEE̜ـ€ÙßR€+,)A1-j|` Å `€€@ÿRߛ̀à@ àAT€Ìó óÌà@ àò òKNOXVILLE€ÌÌà@ àJANUARY€1997€SESSIONó óà@ àÌÌÌÌò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,€à àœó ó)›Ìà àà àà àà àà àœ)›à àÌà àà àAppellee,à àà àœ)›à àC.C.A.€No.€03C01„9603„CC„00118Ìà àà àà àà àà àœ)›Ìvs.à àà àà àà àà àœ)›à àBlount€Countyà àÌà àà àà àà àà à)Ìò òROBIN€N.€CLARK,à àà àà àó ó)à àHonorable€D.€Kelly€Thomas,ÏJudge€Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌà àAppellant.à àà àà àœ)›à à(Jail€Credit,€Speedy€Trial)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à à€Ìà àà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àÌÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à àà àà àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:ÌÌMACK€GARNER€(On€Appeal)à àà àCHARLES€W.€BURSONÌDistrict€Public€Defenderà àà àà àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÌÌNATALEE€HURLEY€(At€Trial)à àà àM.€ALLISON€œTHOMPSON›ÌAssistant€Public€Defenderà àà àà àCounsel€for€the€StateÌ419€High€St.à àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌMaryville,€TN€37804à àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493à àÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àPHILLIP€MORTONÌà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà à363€Court€St.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àMaryville,€TN€37804„5906ÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€____________________ÌÌÌò òAFFIRMEDó óÌÌÌCURWOOD€WITT,€ÌJUDGEÌÌÌÇà@ àOPINIONÓÓÓ` °‚X˜XÓÌÌà àThe€appellant,€Robin€N.€Clark,€appeals€as€of€right€from€the€BlountÏCounty€Circuit€Courtððs€order€revoking€her€probation.€€In€1993,€Clark€pled€guiltyÏto€œfour€counts›€of€uttering€a€forged€instrument.€€The€trial€judge€sentenced€her€toÏtwo€years€on€each€count€with€the€sentences€to€be€served€concurrently.€€SheÏwas€placed€on€intensive€probation€after€completing€a€drug€rehabilitationÏprogram.€€ÌÌà àThe€appellant€concedes€that€she€violated€the€rules€of€probationÏand€does€not€contest€the€order€to€serve€the€balance€of€her€sentence€in€theÏDepartment€of€Corrections.€€In€this€appeal,€she€contends€that,€(1)€the€trial€courtððsÏrefusal€to€grant€her€jail€credit€for€time€served€in€four€Knox€County€convictionsÏconstitutes€an€improper€modification€of€her€sentence,€and€(2)€the€stateððs€failureÏto€bring€her€before€the€Blount€County€Court€on€the€probation€revocation€warrantÏduring€the€time€she€was€incarcerated€in€Knox€County€on€a€concurrent€sentenceÏviolated€her€right€to€a€speedy€trial.€€€ÌÌà àFor€the€reasons€discussed€below,€we€find€that€appellantððsÏsentences€imposed€in€the€Knox€County€cases€were,€as€a€matter€of€law,Ícumulative€with€those€imposed€by€the€Blount€County€Court,€and,€therefore,€sheÏwas€not€entitled€to€any€jail€credit€for€the€time€served€in€Knox€County.€€Moreover,Ïwe€find€that€the€four„month€delay€between€her€incarceration€in€Knox€County€andÏthe€probation€revocation€hearing€in€Blount€County€did€not€violate€appellantððsÏright€to€a€speedy€trial.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.ÌœÌÌ›à àClark€committed€the€offenses€relevant€to€this€appeal€on€July€24,Ï1992€in€Blount€County,€Tennessee.€€In€December,€1992€and€April,€1993,€sheÏcommitted€four€forgeries€in€Knox€County.€€She€pled€guilty€to€the€Blount€CountyÏoffenses.€€On€June€15,€1993,€the€trial€court€conducted€a€sentencing€hearing€andÏplaced€Clark€on€intensive€probation.€€A€warrant€of€violation€of€probation€issuedÏon€August€1,€1994.€€She€was€sentenced€on€four€Knox€County€charges€inÏOctober,€1994€and€received€a€œone„year€sentence›€œon€each€conviction€to›€beÏserved€concurrently€in€the€Community€Alternatives€to€Prison€Program€(CAPP).€ÏThe€Knox€County€judgment€orders€make€no€mention€of€the€Blount€CountyÏsentences€or€the€pending€warrant.€€ÌÌà àOn€June€15,€1995,€appellant€turned€herself€in€to€Knox€County€forÏfailure€to€report€to€the€CAPP€program.€€She€began€serving€her€sentence€in€theÍKnox€County€cases€on€June€25.œ× ƒ. ××  ×›€€€€After€serving€approximately€four€months,€sheÏwas€returned€to€Blount€County€for€a€probation€revocation€hearing.€€At€theÏhearing,€the€Blount€County€trial€court€found€that€she€had€violated€her€probationÏand€required€her€to€serve€the€balance€of€her€two„year€sentence€in€theÏTennessee€Department€of€Corrections.€€The€trial€court€refused€to€grant€appellantÏcredit€for€the€jail€time€she€had€accrued€in€the€Knox€County€Jail.ÌÌà àClark€contends€that€in€denying€her€this€jail€credit€the€Blount€CountyÏCourt€improperly€modified€the€sentence€originally€pronounced€in€the€KnoxÏCounty€cases.€Since€the€Knox€County€judgment€orders€do€not€require€her€toÏserve€her€sentences€consecutive€to€the€existing€Blount€County€sentences,Ïappellant€argues€that€the€sentences€must€be€served€concurrently€and€that€jailÏtime€served€in€Knox€County€should€apply€equally€against€her€Blount€CountyÏsentences.€€We€respectfully€disagree.ÌÌà àThe€unstated€premise€underlying€the€appellantððs€argument€is€thatÏunless€the€trial€courtððs€order€affirmatively€reflects€that€sentences€are€to€runÏconsecutively,€they€shall€be€deemed€to€be€concurrent.€€This€is€a€correctÍstatement€of€the€law,€but€only€in€those€instances€where€a€defendant€is€convictedÏin€a€single€trial€of€more€than€one€offense.€€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(c)(1).× ƒ/ ××  ×€€€The€ruleÏdoes€not€apply€in€this€case€where€the€sentences€resulted€from€separateÏproceedings€in€different€counties.€€The€fact€that€the€judgment€orders€in€the€KnoxÏCounty€convictions€do€not€order€that€the€sentences€be€served€consecutively€toÏthose€in€Blount€County€does€not€require€that€the€sentences€be€deemedÏconcurrent.ÌÌà àMoreover,€if€the€trial€court€had€ordered€that€the€appellant€serve€theÏKnox€County€sentences€concurrently€with€those€in€Blount€County,€the€sentenceÏwould€have€been€contrary€to€law€and€void.€€Tennessee€Code€AnnotatedÍSection€40„20„111(b)€provides€that€if€a€defendant€commits€a€felony€while€out€onÏbail€and€is€convicted€of€both€offenses,€"the€trial€judge€shall€not€have€discretionÏas€to€whether€the€sentences€shall€run€concurrently€or€cumulatively€but€shallÏorder€that€such€sentences€be€served€cumulatively."€€€An€order€of€a€trial€court€thatÏis€in€direct€contravention€of€an€express€statutory€provision€is€a€nullity.€€òòState€v.ÏBurkhartóó,€566€S.W.2d€871,€873€(Tenn.€1978);€òòState€v.€Archeróó,€594€S.W.2d€751,Ï752€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1979)€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1980);€òòState€v.ÏJohnny€Fred€Baylesóó,€No.€02C01„9511„CC„00332€slip€op.€at€3€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,ÏJackson,€June€28,€œ1996)€òòperm.€to€appeal€grantedóó€(Tenn.1997).›€€ÌÌà àIn€addition,€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Criminal€Procedure€state:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 à€œ(3)€òòMandatory€Consecutive€Sentencesóó.›€Ïà àWhere€a€defendant€is€convictedÏof€multiple€offenses€from€one€trial€òòorÏwhere€the€defendant€has€additionalÏsentences€not€yet€fully€served€as€theÏresult€of€the€convictions€in€the€same€orÏother€court€and€the€law€requiresÏconsecutive€sentences,€the€sentenceÏshall€be€consecutive€whether€theÏjudgment€explicitly€so€orders€or€not.óó€ÏThe€rule€shall€apply:€.€.€.ÌÌà8 àà8 à€€œ(C)›€€€€€to€a€sentence€for€a€felony€whereÏthe€defendant€was€released€on€bail€andÏthe€defendant€is€convicted€of€bothÏoffenses.ÌÌTenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32€œ(3)(C)(emphasis›€added).€€ÓÓThe€rules€of€criminal€procedure,Ïlike€the€other€rules€of€procedure€are€"laws"€of€this€state.€òòTennessee€Dept.€ofÏHuman€Services€v.€Vaughnóó,€595€S.W.2d€62,€63€(Tenn.€1980).€€The€Knox€CountyÏjudgment€orders€do€not,€by€their€silence,€require€appellant€to€serve€thoseÏsentences€concurrently€with€sentences€resulting€from€other€proceedings.€€€€€TheÏRules€of€Criminal€Procedure€deem€that€such€sentences€are€to€be€servedÏconsecutively€even€if€the€judgment€order€does€not€explicitly€order€that€result.× ƒ0 ××  ×€€ÌÌ€à àThe€trial€court€in€Blount€County€did€not€illegally€modify€theÏjudgment€order€entered€in€Knox€County.€€€Modification€of€the€Knox€CountyÏjudgments€was€unnecessary€because€consecutive€sentencing€was€mandatedÏwhether€the€trial€court€entered€an€explicit€order€or€not.€€€The€trial€court€did€not€errÍin€denying€appellant€credit€for€the€four€months€she€served€on€the€Knox€CountyÏconvictions.× ƒ1 ××  ×€€€Ìà àClark€also€contends€that€the€state€violated€her€right€to€a€speedyÏtrial€by€failing€to€provide€her€with€a€probation€revocation€hearing€during€her€four„month€incarceration€in€Knox€County.€€€She€bases€this€argument€on€theÏassumption€that€the€Knox€County€sentences€were€concurrent€to€those€in€BlountÏCounty.€€Given€our€disposition€of€the€first€issue,€we€conclude€that€ClarkððsÏconstitutional€rights€were€not€violated€by€the€brief€delay.ÌÌà àThe€United€States€and€Tennessee€Constitutions€guarantee€theÏcriminally€accused€the€right€to€a€speedy€trial.€€U.S.Const.€amends.€XI€&€XIV;ÏTenn.€Const.€art.€I,€ðð€9.€€Ô% € ÔA€probation€revocation€proceeding€is€a€continuation€ofÍthe€criminal€prosecution€and€the€defendant€has€a€constitutional€right€to€aÏspeedy€œÌÌtrial›€on€the€offense€of€probation€violation.€€òòAllen€v.€Stateóó,€505€S.W.2d€715€(Tenn.Ï1974);€òòState€v.€Futina€M.€Carltonóó,€No.€01C01„9512„CR„00417€slip€op.€at€1Ï(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Nashville,€April€26,€1996)Ì€€€€€Ìà à€The€United€States€Supreme€Court€has€identified€the€following€fourÏfactors€to€be€considered€in€determining€whether€a€defendant€had€been€denied€aÏspeedy€trial:€(1)€length€of€delay,€(2)€reason€for€delay,€(3)€defendant's€assertionÏof€his€or€her€right€to€a€speedy€trial,€and€(4)€prejudice€to€the€defendant.€€òòBarker€v.ÏWingoóó,€407€U.S.€514,€533,€92€S.€Ct.€2182,€2193,€(1972);€òòState€v.€Bishopóó,€493ÏS.W.2d€81,€83„84€(Tenn.€1973).€€€The€length€of€the€delay€is€a€"triggeringÏmechanism"€to€inquire€into€the€other€three€factors.€€òòState€v.€œWoodsóó,›€œ924€S.W.2dÏ342,€346€(Tenn.›€œ1996).€€The›€facts€and€nature€of€each€case€determine€whetherÏthe€delay€is€presumptively€prejudicial€in€that€instance.€€òòState€v.€Ronnie€Croweóó,ÏNo.€02C01„9112„CC„00274€slip€op.€at€8€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Jackson,€Jan.€20,Ï1993).€€ÌÌà àWe€have€found€nothing€in€the€record€to€indicate€that€œin›€this€case€aÏfour„month€delay€should€be€considered€presumptively€prejudicial.€€Moreover,€itÏis€readily€apparent€that€appellant€suffered€no€actual€prejudice.€€Tennessee€lawÏrequires€that€the€sentences€for€the€Blount€County€offenses€and€the€sentencesÏfor€the€Knox€County€offenses€be€served€consecutively.€€Clark€could€not€haveÏobtained€credit€toward€her€Blount€County€sentences€for€the€time€served€in€KnoxÏCounty€had€she€been€transported€to€Blount€County€on€the€day€she€surrenderedÏto€Knox€County€authorities.€€ÌœÌÇ›à àA€careful€review€of€the€law€and€the€facts€discloses€no€errorÏrequiring€reversal€or€modification€of€the€trial€courtððs€probation€revocation€order.€ÏThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.ÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà à_____________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àCurwood€Witt,€JudgeÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌ_______________________________ÌœGary€R.€Wade,€Judge›ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà à€€Ì_______________________________ÌœJoseph€M.€Tipton,€Judge›Ì