ÿWPCÈ $Œœþ)Žr€½%a“ÊÔÜ‚gâ´÷„œkµ&5=toSÊã‡Fî­-`ˆõÞÄÜr<[‰¿"öMö95®“(e“ÿšúB”K´¼_h|Ëû’Ò¿#Á ã Ò†àŽñAÕ¹«¼±Oô,_r°ÑM|טÎVˆžÖÉʳ¢k/›µÈb€ö¹æ*¼Ö|Ìò´”è.¹QaY ÑWQr×gHz!%­ÿ =;SÎ…¢Z#*Fôø'ïüäkƃî]Ê«ggúc¹ SŸ-N?ËÞeØȲØ%‡£D2ú”­ÂÔÎ^UͭˆhN+wp~Jgµ–/FÒ—^W-hnë3 ’x ^ faN,f.”#!– m·fÎ 4Æ:ÆÆÆÆŒÆR BÀ5õf aÿ"Î!‡ïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïï D5vvvv 0D««« AQïï 0D@ 0D„<þ6X9`(CourierX ù #Ñ#€Xd#Ñ Ñ  Ñ tÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÑ\R AØ'Legal\Ñ3|x«<þ6X9`(CourierXôxþ6X@ɹ`7ûX@($¡¡, øð AZ"Arial RegulartpO' PTOSHAEddinsHigbeeHigbeesSchnecklothBustamonteJacuminRoberson(I(2C$¤¤Ý ƒ !ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XùÖXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular Ï4 ' Tom Kulaga0Tom Kulaga .   ]¬'L TÄTABLE A \Ñ\R AØ'ÿ Legal\Ñ ˜HP LaserJet 8000 DN PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ \Ñ\R AØ'ÿ Legal\ÑHLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 d ¶Ý ƒC$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XùÖXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€defendantððs€pre„sentence€report€showed€that€he€was€convicted€ofÐ `  Ðone€aggravated€burglary,€nine€auto€burglaries,€nine€thefts,€and€one€DUI€offense,Ïall€committed€when€the€defendant€was€eighteen€years€old.€€That€same€year€heÏwas€also€convicted€of€driving€while€his€license€was€suspended. Ý ƒb¯#"ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€‰yXXÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€XùÖX‰yÔÐ  ÐÌDecember€29,€1999ÌÌCecil€Ô_ÔCrowsonÔ_Ô,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAYÔó ó°¸TABLE C õÝ ƒC$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XùÖXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€defendantððs€indictment€included€a€charge€for€theft€of€property€valuedÐ `  Ðunder€$500,€but€the€charge€Ô‡ XùÖXXXùÖÔwas€subsequently€nolle€Ô_ÔprosequiedÔ_Ô€as€part€of€theÐ F æ Ðplea€agreementÔ#†XùÖXX XùÖü#ÔÔ‡ XùÖXXXùÖÔ.Ô#†XùÖXX XùÖ±#Ô€ ÄÝ ƒC$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XùÖXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€defendantððs€indictment€included€a€charge€for€escape,€but€that€Ô‡ XùÖXXXùÖÔchargeÐ `  Ðwas€subsequently€nolle€Ô_ÔprosequiedÔ_Ô€as€part€of€the€plea€agreementÔ#†XùÖXX XùÖÅ#ÔÔ‡ XùÖXXXùÖÔ.Ô#†XùÖXX XùÖ#Ô }Ý ƒC$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XùÖXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔHe€was€also€indicted€for€driving€on€a€revoked€license,€Ô‡ XùÖXXXùÖÔbut€that€charge€wasÐ `  Ðsubsequently€nolle€Ô_ÔprosequiedÔ_Ô€as€part€of€the€plea€agreement.Ô#†XùÖXX XùÖ·#Ô"""")ÿÿ!dxdx(3¯#$££Ý ƒ !ÝÝ  Ýb]cYCþÿ<<Cÿÿ(3¯#$¢¢Ý ƒ !ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óÝ ƒ !ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ` °ÑÒ°ÒÓ  ÓÑTR[° AØ'Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€ XùÖXXXÔÔ_ÔÌÑ€Ñò òÑ€ÑÑ€ÑÑ€Ñà@˜ ˜ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ F æ ÐÌà@FF'àAT€NASHVILLEˆÌÌßx€`%YB2.jzÄÿ¿`  `€€@ÿEŒµ` 8ttxPÄö ð ¿ xßà@#àDECEMBER€1999€SESSIONó óˆÐ ö – ÐÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÔ*~ƒ&'ddd Xdd Xdd X(#(#~ÔÔ,Å d ÔÔ,Âdd ÔÔ,™ d ÔÔ+  ÔÐ  ²  Ðò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à h à€ó óÐ v  ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àAppellee,ÌÌvs.ÌÌò òJOHNNIE€SHANE€CAPLEY,ó óÐ à€ ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àAppellant.Ð  ²R Ð)Ì)Ì)Ì)Ì)Ì)Ì)Ì)Ì)Ì)Ì)Ì)Ð  X ø# ÐC.C.A.€No.M199900353CCAR3CDÌÌÌWilliamson€CountyÌÌHon.€Timothy€L.€Easter,€JudgeÌÌ(simple€possession€of€marijuana,€Ìburglary,€theft€over€$1,000,Ïaggravated€burglary,€theft€overÏ$10,000,€evading€arrest,€autoÏburglary)Ð X ø/ Ðò òó óÌÌÌÔ*~ƒd($ãdÅ d Âdd ™ d &'(#(#~ÔÔ,‡dÔÔ,™ d ÔÔ+  ÔÐ   $À2 Ðò òFOR€THE€APPELLANT:ó óÐ „$$3 Ðò òòòóóEUGENE€J.€HONEAó óÐ p%4 ÐAsst.€Public€DefenderÌ407„C€Main€StreetÌFranklin,€TN€37065„0068ÌÐ  )®8 Ðò òFOR€THE€APPELLEE:ó óÐ „$$9 Ðò òPAUL€G.€SUMMERSó óÐ p%: ÐAttorney€General€&€ReporterÌÌò òELIZABETH€T.€RYANó óÐ ((È= ÐAsst.€Attorney€GeneralÌ425€Fifth€Ave.€NorthÌ2d€Floor,€Cordell€Hull€Bldg.ÌNashville,€TN€€37243„0493ÌÌò òRONALD€L.€DAVISó óÐ ’-2$C ÐDistrict€Attorney€Generalò òó óÐ ~.%D ÐÌò òJEFFREY€PRESTON€BURKSó óÐ J0ê&F ÐAsst.€District€Attorney€GeneralÌWilliamson€Cnty.€CourthouseÌFranklin,€TN€37065„0937ÌÐ è3ˆ*J ÐÌÌOPINION€FILED:________________ÌÌò òÌAFFIRMEDÌÐ n:1P ÐJAMES€CURWOOD€WITT,€JR.,€JUDGEó óÐ  Z;ú1Q ÐÑÑâ âÑ8€!ÑXXdêXXdæ8Ñâ âÑ  Ñâ âÑÑÑ  ÑÑTR[° AØ'Legal[° AØ'Legal AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ LegalTÑâ âÑ  ÑÔ  ÔÑ  ÑÓ'X‚X¸ ˜Xÿÿ°œX'ÓÑ8€ ùÖ XXdìXXdê8ÑÑ€†ÑÑ€† ÑÓ Óà@qq*àò òòòOPINIONó óóóˆÐ `  ÐÓÓà ¸ àThe€defendant,€Johnnie€Shane€Capley,€appeals€from€his€sentencesÏimposed€for€his€Williamson€County€Criminal€Court€convictions.€€The€defendantÏpleaded€guilty€to€simple€possession€of€marijuana,€a€Class€A€misdemeanor;€burglary,Ïa€Class€D€felony;€theft€of€property€valued€over€$1,000,€a€Class€D€felony;€aggravatedÏburglary,€a€Class€C€felony;€theft€of€property€valued€over€$10,000,€a€Class€C€felony;Ïevading€arrest,€a€Class€A€misdemeanor;€and€auto€burglary,€a€Class€E€felony.€€AfterÏa€sentencing€hearing,€the€defendant€was€sentenced€to€an€effective€term€of€25€yearsÏin€the€Department€of€Correction€as€a€Range€III,€persistent€offender.€€In€this€directÏappeal,€the€defendant€complains€that€his€sentences€were€improper.€€Following€aÏreview€of€the€record,€the€briefs€of€the€parties,€and€the€applicable€law,€we€affirm€theÏdefendantððs€sentences.Ìà ¸ àDespite€being€only€25€years€old€at€the€time€of€his€sentencing€hearing,Ïthe€defendant€in€the€case€at€bar€has€an€extensive€criminal€history.€€When€theÏdefendant€was€eighteen€years€old,€he€went€on€a€crime€spree,€committing€a€stringÏof€auto€burglaries€and€theft€offenses€over€a€seven€month€period.׃$×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€He€received€anÐ ,&Ì  Ðeffective€sentence€of€five€years€for€those€offenses.€€After€serving€almost€two€yearsÏof€that€sentence€in€the€Department€of€Correction,€the€defendant€was€granted€parole.€ÏHe€violated€parole€and€served€another€year€before€his€sentences€expired€in€1996.Ìà ¸ àIn€1997,€he€was€arrested€for€marijuana€possession€and€driving€with€aÏrevoked€license.€€He€was€subsequently€convicted€of€those€offenses.€€The€defendantÏwas€placed€on€probation€for€two€years€after€his€conviction€on€March€30,€1998€forÏâ âmarijuana€possession.€€While€out€on€bail€for€the€marijuana€possession€offense€andÐ Œ4,+0£ Ðduring€the€first€week€of€January,€1998,€the€defendant€burglarized€a€church€and€stoleÏvarious€tools.€€He€was€indicted€for€burglary€and€theft€of€property€valued€over€$1000.Ìâ âà ¸ àOn€May€5,€1998,€after€being€placed€on€probation€for€the€marijuanaÏpossession€conviction,€the€defendant€was€arrested€for€driving€on€a€revoked€licenseÏand€simple€possession€of€marijuana.€€The€defendant€was€indicted€for€simpleÏpossession.׃+×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€€As€a€result€of€this€arrest,€his€car€was€impounded.€€A€week€later€whenÐ (È  Ðthe€defendant€was€picking€up€his€car€from€the€impound€lot,€he€saw€a€VCR€in€the€carÏnext€to€his.€€He€broke€into€that€car€and€stole€the€VCR.€€The€defendant€was€indictedÏfor€auto€burglary.׃)\×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð Œ, Ðà ¸ àLess€than€a€week€after€stealing€the€VCR,€the€defendant€burglarizedÏthe€home€and€workplace€of€Vernon€Patterson.€€Mr.€Patterson€testified€at€theÏsentencing€hearing€that€approximately€$30,000€of€personal€property€and€tools€wereÏstolen.€€He€has€recovered€less€than€one„fifth€of€his€property,€and€his€automobileÏrepair€business€suffered€because€of€his€lack€of€tools.€€The€defendant€was€arrestedÏin€Davidson€County,€and€while€being€transported€to€Williamson€County,€he€escapedÏfrom€the€officers€when€he€was€being€transferred€from€a€Metro€patrol€car€to€aÏWilliamson€County€patrol€car.€€He€was€apprehended€the€following€day.€€TheÏdefendant€was€indicted€for€aggravated€burglary,€theft€of€property€valued€overÏâ â$10,000,€and€evading€arrest.׃*Ö×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Ð P-ð#( Ðà ¸ àWhile€in€jail€awaiting€trial€for€the€above€offenses,€the€defendantÏâ âescaped€from€jail.€€His€girlfriend€smuggled€a€saw€into€the€jail€and€he€escaped,€takingÏsix€other€prisoners€with€him.€€After€his€recapture,€he€was€convicted€of€escape€andÏsentenced€to€six€years€as€a€career€offender.Ìà ¸ àThe€defendant€pleaded€guilty€to€the€above€indicted€offenses€whichÏwere€committed€in€1998.€€As€part€of€the€plea€agreement,€he€was€to€be€sentencedÏas€a€Range€III,€persistent€offender.€€The€defendant€received€an€effective€sentenceÏof€25€years€for€the€five€felony€and€two€misdemeanor€convictions.ÌÓ Óà@üü(àò òSentencingó óˆÐ Xø ÐÓ ÑÓà ¸ àThe€defendant€complains€that€he€received€excessive€sentences.€ÏWhen€there€is€a€challenge€to€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,Ïit€is€the€duty€of€this€court€to€conduct€a€de€novo€review€of€the€record€with€aÏpresumption€that€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40-35-401(d)€(1997).€€This€presumption€is€"conditioned€upon€theÏaffirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencingÏprinciples€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances."€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2dÐ ø'˜" Ð166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€"The€burden€of€showing€that€the€sentence€is€improper€isÏupon€the€appellant."€€Id.€In€the€event€the€record€fails€to€demonstrate€the€requiredÏconsideration€by€the€trial€court,€review€of€the€sentence€is€purely€de€novo.€€òòId.óó€€IfÐ \-ü#( Ðappellate€review€reflects€the€trial€court€properly€considered€all€relevant€factors€andÏits€findings€of€fact€are€adequately€supported€by€the€record,€this€court€must€affirm€theÏsentence,€"even€if€we€would€have€preferred€a€different€result."€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,Ð À2`). Ð805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).Ìà ¸ àIn€making€its€sentencing€determination,€the€trial€court,€at€theÏconclusion€of€the€sentencing€hearing,€determines€the€range€of€sentence€and€thenÐ ð906 Ðdetermines€the€specific€sentence€and€the€propriety€of€sentencing€alternatives€byÏconsidering€(1)€the€evidence,€if€any,€received€at€the€trial€and€the€sentencing€hearing,Ï(2)€the€presentence€report,€(3)€the€principles€of€sentencing€and€arguments€as€toÏsentencing€alternatives,€(4)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€the€criminal€conductÏinvolved,€(5)€evidence€and€information€offered€by€the€parties€on€the€enhancementÏand€mitigating€factors,€(6)€any€statements€the€defendant€wishes€to€make€in€theÏdefendant's€behalf€about€sentencing,€and€(7)€the€potential€for€rehabilitation€orÏtreatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-210(a),€(b)€(1997);€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÏ40-35-103(5)€(1997);€òòState€v.€Hollandóó,€860€S.W.2d€53,€60€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.1993).Ð À` Ðà ¸ àThe€record€reflects€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€relevant€factorsÏin€determining€the€defendantððs€sentences.€€Accordingly,€its€determination€is€entitledÏto€the€presumption€of€correctness.ÌÓ Óà@óóàòòa)€Sentencing€ConsiderationsóóˆÐ ˆ"( ÐÓ X'Óà ¸ àThe€defendant€complains€that€the€trial€court€improperly€considered€theÏsentencing€considerations€contained€in€Code€section€40„35„103.€€We€disagree.€€TheÏtrial€court€found€that€the€defendant€was€not€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidateÏfor€alternative€sentencing€options€because€he€was€not€an€especially€mitigated€orÏstandard€offender.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-102(6)€(1997).€€Also,€theÐ ˆ+("& Ðdefendant€was€not€eligible€for€probation€for€his€sentences€which€exceeded€eightÏyears€in€length.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-303(a)€(1997).Ð  /À%* ÐÓ Óà ¸ àThe€pertinent€portion€of€Code€section€40„35„103€provides€that€ÌÓ )*ÓÓ$ XœXX‚X¸ ˜X$ÓÓÓà8 ` à(1)€Sentences€involving€confinement€should€be€based€on€the€followingÏconsiderations:Ð ` Ð ` Ð  ÐÓ(X‚X¸ ˜XXœX¢*(ÓÓ$ XœXX‚X¸ ˜X$Óà8 ` àà ¸ à(A)€Confinement€is€necessary€to€protect€society€by€restrainingÏâ âa€defendant€who€has€a€long€history€of€criminal€conduct;Ð8¼.4` Ð ` Ð  Ðà8 ` àà ¸ à(B)€Confinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€theÏâ âseriousness€of€the€offense€or€confinement€is€particularly€suited€toÏprovide€an€effective€deterrence€to€others€likely€to€commit€similarÏoffenses;€€orÐ ` Ð ` Ð  Ðà8 ` àà ¸ à(C)€Measures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€have€frequentlyÏor€recently€been€applied€unsuccessfully€to€the€defendant.Ð ` Ð ` Ð  ÐÓ(X‚X¸ ˜XXœXw+(ÓÓÆ*ÓTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40-35-103€(1997).€€In€the€case€at€bar,€the€trial€courtÏfound,€and€the€record€amply€supports€its€finding,€that€the€defendant€has€a€longÏhistory€of€criminal€conduct€and€measures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€haveÏbeen€unsuccessful€in€the€past.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„103(1)(A)€&Ð ô”  Ð-103(1)(C)€(1997).€€The€trial€court€also€found€that€the€defendantððs€past€recordÏshowed€his€lack€of€potential€for€rehabilitation.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(5)Ð Œ, Ð(1997).€€The€record€shows€that€the€defendant€violated€parole€and€committedÏnumerous€offenses€while€out€on€bail€and€on€probation.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÓ Óà@::#àòòb)€Length€of€SentenceóóˆÐ ¼ \ ÐÓ ý0Óà ¸ àIn€determining€the€sentences,€the€trial€court€applied€threeÏenhancement€factors€to€all€the€convictions:€(1)€a€previous€history€of€criminalÏconvictions€and€behavior,€(8)€a€previous€history€of€unwillingness€to€comply€with€theÏconditions€of€release€in€the€community,€and€(13)€the€offenses€were€committed€whileÏon€bail€or€probation.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-114(1),€(8),€(13)€(1997).€€Also,Ð ¼)\ $ Ðthe€trial€court€applied€enhancement€factor€(6)€to€the€convictions€of€aggravatedÏburglary€and€theft€of€property€valued€greater€than€$10,000.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð T-ô#( Ððð€40-35-114(6)€(1997)€(the€amount€of€damage€to€property€was€particularly€great).€ÏThe€trial€court€found€mitigation€factor€(1)€applicable,€but€found€that€it€wasÏoutweighed€by€the€enhancement€factors.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(1)Ð ¸2X). Ð(1997)€(conduct€neither€caused€nor€threatened€serious€bodily€injury).Ìà ¸ àConsidering€both€the€defendantððs€prior€criminal€conviction€history€andÏhis€admission€of€the€use€of€marijuana€and€cocaine,€the€record€adequately€supportsÐ è9ˆ06 Ðthe€application€of€enhancement€factor€(1),€that€the€ð ðdefendant€has€a€previous€historyÏof€criminal€convictions€or€criminal€behavior€in€addition€to€those€necessary€toÏestablish€the€appropriate€range.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1)€(1997).€€TheÏdefendantððs€plea€agreement€was€for€him€to€be€sentenced€as€a€Range€III,€persistentÏoffender,€although€he€had€been€convicted€as€a€career€offender€for€escaping€fromÏjail€while€awaiting€trial€for€the€current€offenses.€€òòCompareóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð \ü  Ð107€(1997)€(persistent€offender)€òòwithóó€ðð€40„35„108€(1997)€(career€offender).€€Also,Ð (È  Ðduring€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€defendant€testified€to€illegal€drug€use,€even€whileÏhe€was€incarcerated.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€òòState€v.€Vanderfordóó,€980€S.W.2d€390,€407€(Tenn.Ð À` ÐCrim.€App.€1997)€(holding€enhancement€factor€(1)€proper€when€defendant€admittedÏto€a€history€of€drug€use).Ìà ¸ àThe€trial€court€applied€enhancement€factor€(6),€that€ð ðthe€amount€ofÏdamage€to€property€sustained€by€or€taken€from€the€victim€was€particularly€great,ðð€toÏthe€convictions€of€aggravated€burglary€and€theft€of€property€valued€over€$10,000.€ÏòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(6)€(1997).€€This€court€has€held€that€normally€itÐ T$ô Ðwould€be€improper€to€further€enhance€a€sentence€by€applying€factor€(6)€to€a€theftÏoffense,€which€is€graded€by€the€value€of€property€taken.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ ì'Œ" Ð39-14-105€(theft€of€property€valued€over€$10,000,€but€under€$60,000,€is€a€Class€CÏfelony);€òòState€v.€Jeffery€A.€Mikaóó,€No.€02C01„9508„CR„00244€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,Ð „+$"& ÐJackson,€Feb.€25,€1997)€(holding€that€offense€of€theft€is€graded€according€to€theÏamount€of€property€taken);€òòState€v.€Mike€Wayne€Tateóó,€No.€03C01„9204„CR„127Ð /¼%* Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€Mar.€4,€1993)€(holding€that€value€of€property€taken€isÏelement€of€theft).€€However,€there€was€testimony€by€the€victim€of€these€offenses€thatÏhe€suffered€particularly€great€losses€other€than€the€value€of€the€property€taken.€ÏVernon€Patterson€testified€that€his€automobile€repair€business€was€shut€down€forÏthree€weeks€and€his€one€employee€could€not€be€paid€for€the€month€following€theÏtheft.€€He€stated€that€he€lost€customers€because€his€shop€was€shut€down.€He€furtherÐ ä9„06 Ðtestified€that€he€had€to€have€other€shops€repair€the€cars€that€he€was€working€on€atÏthe€time€of€the€aggravated€burglary€and€theft,€and€this€was€done€at€his€expense.€ÏBecause€of€these€great€losses€suffered€by€the€victim€which€were€separate€from€theÏvalue€of€the€property€taken,€we€conclude€that€the€record€supports€the€application€ofÏenhancement€factor€(6)€to€the€convictions€for€aggravated€burglary€and€theft€ofÏproperty€valued€over€$10,000.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Mason€Thomas€€Wilbanksóó,€No.€01C01„Ð \ü  Ð9804„CR„00184,€slip€op.€at€8€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Nashville,€May€21,€1999)€(holdingÏfactor€(6)€applicable€because€there€was€evidence,€aside€from€the€value€of€propertyÏtaken,€that€the€ð ðlosses€were€particularly€devastating€to€the€students€and€staff€.€.€.€inÏthat€school€pride€was€diminished,€educational€opportunities€and€benefits€were€lostðð);ÏòòState€v.€Barbara€D.€Frankóó,€No.€03C01-9209-CR-00303,€slip€op.€at€9€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð Xø ÐApp.,€Knoxville,€Dec.€22,€1993)€(enhancement€factor€(6)€applied€becauseÏembezzlement€theft€of€$52,000€approached€the€Class€B€felony€range€and€lossesÏwere€particularly€damaging€to€owners€of€the€victim€business).€€€Ìà ¸ àThe€record€properly€supports€application€of€enhancement€factor€(8),Ïthat€the€defendant€has€a€ð ðprevious€history€of€unwillingness€to€comply€with€theÏconditions€of€a€sentence€involving€release€in€the€community.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ ì'Œ" Ð40„35„114(8)€(1997).€€The€defendant€was€released€on€parole€from€his€1992Ïconvictions€and€was€subsequently€incarcerated€in€1995€after€violating€parole.€€TheÏdefendant€alleges€that€a€sentence€in€which€the€prisoner€is€granted€parole€is€not€aÏð ðsentence€involving€release€in€the€community.ðð€€However,€we€are€mindful€of€theÏdefinition€of€the€term€ð ðparole.ðð€€Code€section€40„28„105(4)€defines€parole€as€ð ðtheÏrelease€of€a€prisoner€to€the€community€.€.€.€prior€to€the€expiration€of€such€prisoner'sÏterm.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-28-102€(1997€&€Supp.€1999).€€Ìà ¸ àThe€defendant€argues€that€applying€factor€(8)€to€parole€violationsÏwould€be€Ô_ÔoverbroadÔ_Ô€because€almost€all€incarcerative€sentences€involve€parole.€Ð ä9„06 Ðц Ñâ âÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal[° AØ'Legal AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ LegalTÑâ âÑ  ÑHowever,€the€defendant€cites€no€authority€for€this€argument,€and€we€are€notÐ `  Ðpersuaded.€€We€note€that€the€purpose€of€enhancement€factors€is€to€provide€greaterÏpenalties€for€those€whose€conduct€justifies€a€departure€from€the€minimum€sentence.€ÏòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114,€Sentencing€Commððn€Comments€(1997);€ðð40„Ð Äd Ð35„210€(Supp.€1999).€€It€is€no€matter€that€almost€every€incarcerative€sentenceÏinvolves€parole€because€it€is€the€defendantððs€conduct€while€on€parole€thatÏdetermines€the€application€of€the€enhancement€factor.€€Accordingly,€we€concludeÏthat€factor€(8)€is€supported€by€the€defendantððs€previous€parole€violation.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,Ð ô”  ÐòòState€v.€Adamsóó,€973€S.W.2d€224,€230€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997)€(holdingÐ À` Ðenhancement€factor€(8)€established€by€evidence€of€parole€violation€and€supportedÏby€evidence€of€juvenile€probation€violations);€òòState€v.€Kernóó,€909€S.W.2d€5,€7€(Tenn.Ð Xø ÐCrim.€App.€1993)€(holding€enhancement€factor€(8)€appropriate€where€appellantÏadmitted€to€a€pending€parole€violation).€€Ìà ¸ àThe€defendant€complains€that€the€trial€court€found€that€enhancementÏfactor€(13)€applied€because€the€offenses€were€committed€while€the€defendant€wasÏon€probation.€€The€defendant€alleges€that€he€was€not€on€probation,€but€he€was€outÏon€bail€at€the€time€of€the€offenses,€and€he€admits€that€the€enhancement€factorÏapplies€in€his€case.€€The€pre„sentence€report,€which€was€uncontested€at€theÏsentencing€hearing,€clearly€shows€that€the€defendant€was€on€probation€for€hisÏmarijuana€possession€conviction€when€he€committed€all€the€offenses€except€for€theÏtwo€Class€D€felonies,€which€the€defendant€committed€while€he€was€out€on€bail€forÏthe€marijuana€possession€charge.€€Accordingly,€we€conclude€that€enhancementÏfactor€(13)€applies.Ìà ¸ àFinally,€the€trial€court€applied€mitigating€factor€(1),€that€the€defendantððsÏconduct€neither€caused€nor€threatened€serious€bodily€injury.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð 8¸.4 Ððð€40„35„113(1)€(1997).€€The€defendant€testified€at€the€sentencing€hearing€thatÐ ä9„06 Ðbefore€committing€the€aggravated€burglary,€he€determined€that€the€homeownersÏwere€not€home.€€This€factor€weighs€in€favor€of€the€defendant.Ìà ¸ àÔ‡XùÖXX XùÖÔThe€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€to€the€maximum€(15€years)€forÐ Äd Ðthe€two€Class€C€felonies.€€òòÔ#† XùÖXXXùÖ–R#ÔSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„103€(1997)€(theft€ofÐ 0 Ðproperty€valued€over€$10,000);€ðð€39„14„403€(1997)€(aggravated€burglary).€€For€theÔ‡XùÖXX XùÖÔÐ \ü  Ðtwo€Class€D€felonies,Ô#† XùÖXXXùÖïS#Ô€Ô‡XùÖXX XùÖÔthe€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€to€the€mid„point€(10Ð (È  Ðyears).€€òòÔ#† XùÖXXXùÖ\T#ÔSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„14„103€(theft€of€property€over€$1000);€ðð€39„14„Ð ô”  Ð402€(burglary).€€The€trial€court€Ô‡XùÖXX XùÖÔsentenced€the€defendantÔ#† XùÖXXXùÖ‚U#ÔÔ‡XùÖXX XùÖÔ€to€the€maximum€(6€years)Ð À` Ðfor€the€single€Class€E€felony.€€òòÔ#† XùÖXXXùÖÛU#ÔSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„14„402€(1997)€(autoÐ Œ, Ðburglary)Ô‡XùÖXX XùÖÔ.€€Ð Xø Ðà ¸ àFor€the€two€misdemeanors,€the€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€toÏeleven€months,€twenty„nine€days.Ô#† XùÖXXXùÖ¾V#Ô€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„17„418€(1997)Ð ¼ \ Ð(simple€possession€of€marijuana);€ðð39„16„603€(evading€arrest);€ðð€40„35„302€(1997)Ï(misdemeanor€sentencing).€€Ô‡XùÖXX XùÖÔHowever,€the€trial€court€did€not€set€a€percentage€of€theÐ T$ô Ðsentence€which€must€be€served€as€required€by€statute.€€Ô#† XùÖXXXùÖCX#ÔThe€misdemeanorÐ  &À  Ðsentencing€statute€provides€that€the€trial€court€ð ðshall€fix€a€percentage€of€theÏsentence€which€the€defendant€shall€serve.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40-35-302(d)Ï(1997).€€Further,€the€statute€provides,€"If€no€percentage€is€expressed€in€theÏjudgment,€the€percentage€shall€be€considered€zero€percent€(0%)."€€òòId.óó€€Accordingly,Ð P-ð#( Ðwe€conclude€that€the€misdemeanor€sentences€are€to€be€served€at€zero€percent.Ìà ¸ àGiven€the€trial€court's€proper€application€of€the€enhancement€andÏmitigating€factors,€we€agree€with€the€state€that€the€defendant€has€failed€to€carry€hisÏburden€of€overcoming€the€presumption€of€correctness€of€the€trial€court's€decision.ÌÓ Óà@ŠŠ!àòòc)€Consecutive€SentencesóóˆÐ ä9„06 ÐÓ Ò[ÓÓ Óà ¸ àThe€defendant€also€complains€about€the€imposition€of€consecutiveÏsentences.€€Consecutive€sentences€may€be€imposed€in€the€discretion€of€the€trialÏcourt€only€upon€a€determination€that€one€or€more€of€the€following€criteria€exist:ÌÓ F\Óò òó óÓÓÓ$ XœXX‚X¸ ˜X$Óà8 ` à(1)€The€defendant€is€a€professional€criminal€who€has€knowinglyÐ Äd Ðdevoted€himself€to€criminal€acts€as€a€major€source€of€livelihood.€€Ð ` Ð ` Ð  Ðà8 ` à(2)€The€defendant€is€an€offender€whose€record€of€criminal€activity€isÏextensive;Ð ` Ð ` Ð  Ðà8 ` à(3)€The€defendant€is€a€dangerous€and€mentally€abnormal€person€soÏdeclared€by€a€competent€psychiatrist€who€concludes€as€a€result€of€anÏinvestigation€prior€to€sentencing€that€the€defendant's€criminal€conductÏhas€been€characterized€by€a€pattern€of€repetitive€or€compulsiveÏbehavior€with€heedless€indifference€to€consequences;Ð ` Ð ` Ð  Ðà8 ` à(4)€The€defendant€is€a€dangerous€offender€whose€behavior€indicatesÏlittle€or€no€regard€for€human€life,€and€no€hesitation€about€committingÏa€crime€in€which€the€risk€to€human€life€is€high;Ð ` Ð ` Ð  Ðà8 ` à(5)€The€defendant€is€convicted€of€two€(2)€or€more€statutory€offensesÏinvolving€sexual€abuse€of€a€minor€with€consideration€of€theÏaggravating€circumstances€arising€from€the€relationship€between€theÏdefendant€and€victim€or€victims,€the€time€span€of€defendant'sÏundetected€sexual€activity,€the€nature€and€scope€of€the€sexual€actsÏand€the€extent€of€the€residual,€physical€and€mental€damage€to€theÏvictim€or€victims;Ð ` Ð ` Ð  Ðà8 ` à(6)€The€defendant€is€sentenced€for€an€offense€committed€while€onÐ T$ô Ðprobation;€orÐ ` Ð ` Ð  Ðà8 ` à(7)€The€defendant€is€sentenced€for€criminal€contempt.€Ð ` Ð ` Ð  ÐÓi]ÓÓ(X‚X¸ ˜XXœX{](ÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-115(b)€(1997).€€In€òòState€v.€Wilkersonóó,€905€S.W.2d€933,Ð Ò(r# Ð937-38€(Tenn.€1995),€the€supreme€court€imposed€two€additional€requirements€forÏconsecutive€sentencing€under€the€dangerous€offender€category--the€court€must€findÏconsecutive€sentences€are€reasonably€related€to€the€severity€of€the€offensesÏcommitted€and€are€necessary€to€protect€the€public€from€further€criminal€conduct.€Ð 0¢&+ ÐòòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Laneóó,€___€S.W.2d€___€(Tenn.€1999).Ð Î1n(- Ðà ¸ àThe€trial€court€imposed€consecutive€sentences€based€upon€threeÏgrounds€which€are€amply€supported€by€the€record.€€First,€the€trial€court€found€theÏdefendant€to€be€a€professional€criminal€based€on€the€defendantððs€prior€record€andÐ þ8ž/5 Ðц Ñâ âÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal[° AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ LegalTÑâ âÑ  Ñlack€of€proof€of€any€substantial€income€other€than€that€of€criminal€activity.€€òòSeeóóÐ `  ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-115(b)(1)€(1997).€€Second,€the€defendant€has€anÏextensive€criminal€history.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-115(b)(2)€(1997).€€Third,Ð ø ˜ Ðthe€defendant€was€on€probation€when€the€present€offenses€were€committed,€exceptÏfor€the€two€Class€D€felonies€which€were€committed€while€he€was€out€on€bail.€€òòSeeóóÐ 0 ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-115(b)(6)€(1997).€€Any€of€these€grounds€is€sufficient€toÏsupport€the€trial€courtððs€determination€that€the€sentences€for€the€Class€C€felonyÏconvictions€are€to€be€served€consecutively€to€the€other€sentences.€€Additionally,Ïignoring€the€third€ground€above,€the€first€two€grounds€amply€support€the€trial€courtððsÏdetermination€that€all€of€the€defendantððs€sentences€are€to€run€consecutively€with€theÏsentence€he€received€for€his€conviction€of€escape€while€awaiting€trial€on€the€instantÏoffenses.€€Ìà ¸ àIn€consideration€of€the€foregoing€and€the€record€as€a€whole,€theÏsentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.ÌÓÓÓ ÓÌà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à________________________________Ìà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJAMES€CURWOOD€WITT,€JR.,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGEÔ% € ÔÌÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGE