WPC )$9 >(("Pnї=Gys5>\Yom_S/\N2_#%!GU!Cg@1ͷ<FlxseW!fm03E9jR8*_ 1EmW:!jh7 2bP. /[w-yTzcP>h)XWv(lp9S=SՂ6hXiѧu`{Wf|a z6 ioF]ʛ[VkzyHEa@ޡidU`Ԩ`P6m8q@*̳9 ;\]b\z]k8QNKEo'm<8y?!nbKޠuGs&4t6+w8ɣSBg e- <(K-d|K ?wqOL a" Ʒ4,U6F %|  n 0e? #  4 U:  w@ E {4. U:b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b B D3 0D AO0 0DE D/ B'`Boldface PSX3|n%'`Boldface PSXn P[ʘ9XP(=]$  44XX:HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLhuM%,rAZ"Arial Regular DDDDӀ  X XXX (X X    Ad FILED X X (  December11,1998CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerkdAM ( T$  ,cAZ"Arial Regular d%%%%'dxd(3$ !  -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd ]!  44XX:  T TR[A'Legal3'A' Legal3'TX4s44444s  r *<,(j 8` `@E ` 8ttxPX  rߛ@ D X XINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @rr-DATNASHVILLEo[X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?AXoSTATEOFTENNESSEE, h    D )  \  `     h    D ) p C.C.A.NO.01C019808CC00354 3   ` Appellee,   h    D ) p (No.9209Below)    `     h    D ) VS. `     h    D ) p MAURYCOUNTY h   `     h    D ) p TheHon.JimT.Hamilton ?   HOUSTONGRADYCHAPMAN,   D )  f   `     h    D ) p (DenialofMotiontoCorrectSentence)   =   ` Appellant.    h    D )     `     h    D ) p AFFIRMEDPURSUANTTORULE20   @kk/DORDER  G t: `  ThismatterisbeforetheCourtuponthestatesmotionrequestingthatthejudgmentintheabovestyledcausebeaffirmedpursuanttoRule20,TennesseeCourtofCriminalAppealsRules.Uponreviewingtherecord,theappellantsbrief,andthestatesmotion,wefindthatitisanappropriatematterforaffirmanceunderRule20. `  Fromtherecord,itappearsthatonAugust21,1996,theappellantentereda bestinterestpleatotwocountsofattemptedseconddegreemurderandonecountofaggravatedburglary.Aspartoftheagreement,hewassentencedtotenyearsforeachcountofattemptedseconddegreemurder,tobeservedconsecutively,andtothreeyearsforaggravatedburglary.Subsequently,onMarch30,1998,thepetitionerfiledamotiontocorrectillegalsentence.Counselwasappointedtorepresenttheappellant,andahearingwasheldonAugust14,1998.Onthesamedate,thetrialcourtenteredanorderdenyingthemotion. `  Onappeal,theappellantcontendsthathisconsecutivesentencesareillegalbecausethetrialcourtfailedtoinquireormakefindingsoffactastothecriteriasupportingconsecutivesentencesandbecausethefactsdonotsupporttheimpositionofconsecutivesentences. `  InHicksv.State,945S.W.2d706(Tenn.1997),theSupremeCourtheldthat 4/:  aknowingandvoluntaryguiltypleawaivesanyirregularityastooffenderclassificationorreleaseeligibility.Id.at709.Previously,inPatrickWilliamsv.State,No.01C019506 7 3> CR00190(Tenn.Crim.App.,filedMay9,1996),thisCourthadappliedthesamereasoningtotheimpositionofconsecutivesentencingpursuanttoapleaagreement, ;f6B holdingthatstatingthatthe applicabilityofconsecutivesentencingisalsobasedonfaceandisthereforesubjecttopleanegotiation.Slip.Op.5.ThesameappliestothecasenowbeforetheCourt.Accordingly,theCourtholdsfindsthattheappellantsconsecutivesentencesarenotillegalandcannotbesetaside. `  ITIS,THEREFORE,ORDEREDthatthestatesmotiontoaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtunderRule20,TennesseeCourtofCriminalAppealsRules,isgranted,andthejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.Itappearingthatthepetitionerisindigent,costsoftheseproceedingsaretaxedtothestate.t `     h    D  p _____________________________ `     h    D  p JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGECONCUR:_____________________________  JOHNH.PEAY,JUDGE_____________________________DAVIDH.WELLES,JUDGE