WPC 4-}ڶz3zxk7V#,!i{r?1"{s*7d7<_&ZqN M 4.j$OxתaRT.m p +F; ^ ܬNpY4:EmTgk<0.#F/F$k/ Fe5Im|8OE6|Ve % H5H[e%LǔRn_{`| A*o5@jRm떮3`+sz~|qّg366ߥ&qvD̚u\P*dӽjZ)ɼ_W?>/iH⥬mROHɏUYRC'"/iȞqF7UBfmMK9x2a3,gcxV3"8B,& lhϺ&(V͌9m# \U.F %t bz ~ U:  n  0( U: w 4 0 0Db U: B D3 0D0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 AOt 0D D/ B<6X9`(CourierX  XXXXdXX   Ad FILEDd   June22,1999  CecilCrowson,Jr. AppellateCourt  Clerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular3|x:&<6X9`(CourierXx6X@`7X@($,  AZ"Arial Regular&&{&E&&E&&E&&E&&E&&&E &!&Te"&#&$&E%&&&E'&(&E)&*&e+&,&D-&U.& e/&Ӏh&(I(2'$  !  XXXX `   0  (#$  0  ,cAZ"Arial Regular d""""'dxd(3$  !  -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd  !  .&.&.&*&*&.&*&!&!&*&!&!&`   TR[A'Legal3'A' Legal3'T XXXX7  XXdXXd7  /&r*<,(j 8 `@Ef  tt0"H` rߛ/& @ INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE P  ̀@::'AT!&!&KNOXVILLE!&!& 0  @dd%!&!&MAY!&!&1999SESSION   !&!& GLENMARSHALLCHEEK!&!&    !&!& )!&!& p   `     h     ) p  `   `  Appellant, h     ) p C.C.A.No.!&!&03C019809CR00335!&!& P   `     h     )vs. `     h     ) p !&!&Hamilton!&!&County x  0   `     h     ) STATEOFTENNESSEE, h     ) p Hon.!&!&DouglasA.Meyer,!&!&Judge  p   `     h     ) `  `  Appellee. h     ) p !&!&(PostConviction)!&!& P  `     h     FORTHEAPPELLANT: h      p FORTHEAPPELLEE:  !&!& ARDENAJ.GARTH h !&!&     p !&!&PAULG.SUMMERS!&!&   !&!&DistrictPublicDefender h   !&!&   p AttorneyGeneral&Reporter   `    !&!&DONNAROBINSONMILLER!&!&     p !&!& MARVINS.BLAIR,JR. !&!& !` !&!&AssistantPublicDefender!&!&     p !&!&Assistant!&!&AttorneyGeneral "P !&!&701CherryStreet,Suite300!&!&     p !&!&425!&!&FifthAve.N.,2dFloor  #@ !&!& Chattanooga,TN37402!&!& h      p !&!&Nashville,!&!&TN372430493 $0  `     h      p !&!&WILLIAMH.COXIII!&!& p&  `     h      p DistrictAttorneyGeneral  `'  !&!& `     h      p 600MarketStreet,Suite310 P(!  `     h      p Chattanooga,TN37402 !&!& @)"  `     h      p !&!&OPINION!&!&FILED:________________*&*&AFFIRMED"&RULE20"&*&*&JAMESCURWOODWITT,JR.,JUDGE  @8.2 !&!& <26 !&!&'X, XX'@qq* OPINION  `  XXX X !&!&The!&!&petitioner,!&!&GlenMarshallCheek,!&!&appealsfromthe!&!&Hamilton!&!&   CountyCriminalCourtsorderdismissinghispetitionfor!&!&postconviction!&!&relief.Thepetitioner!&!&wasconvictedof!&!&aggravatedsexual!&!&batteryonNovember5,1993.On!&!&!&!&March!&!&!&!&25,!&!&!&!&1997,!&!&hefiledaprosepetition!&!&forpostconvictionreliefallegingthathis $  convictionwasbasedonanindictmentwhichdidnotstatetheculpablementalstate# XXXXO#XXX X.The!&!&trialcourtdenied!&!&relief!&!&becauseitfound!&!&theindictment!&!&!&!&wassufficient   pursuanttoStatev.Hill,# XXXX/#954S.W.2d725,727(Tenn.*&*&1997)XXX X.#&Uponreview,wefind  no#&$&#&r#&$&%&erroroflawrequiringreversalanda%&&&%&i%&&&'&ffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtpursuanttoCourtofCriminal'&(&'&C'&(&)&AppealsRule20.)&!&!&*&*& !&!& # XXXXb#Thestatecontendsthatthepetitionisbarredbythestatuteof 0 limitations.UnderthePostConvictionProcedureActof1995,petitionsfiledafterMay10,1995,mustbefiledwithinone(1)yearfromthedateofthefinalactionofthehigheststateappellatecourttowhichanappealistakenor,ifthereisnoappeal,withinone(1)yearofthedatethatthejudgmentbecamefinal.SeeTenn. &P  CodeAnn.4030202(a)(1997).However,theactgavepetitioners,whosethreeyearstatuteoflimitationsunderthepreviousacthadnotalreadyexpired,oneyearfromtheeffectivedateoftheact,May10,1995,inwhichtofileapetitionforpostconvictionrelief.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4030201,CompilersNotes(1997).A 0.$( petitionfiledbeyondtheoneyearstatuteoflimitationscanonlybeconsideredifcertainstatutoryexceptionsapply.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4030202(b)(1)(3) 1(, (1997).XXX X # XXXX# 3p*.  Thepetitionerfailedtofilehispetitionforpostconvictionreliefwithintheapplicablelimitationsperiod.Thepetitionerdoesnotcontendthatanyofthe p904 statutoryexceptionsapplytohisclaim.Instead,thepetitionercontendsthatthestatuteoflimitationsshouldnotbarhispetitionbecauseapplicationofthestatuteoflimitationswouldnotaffordhimareasonableopportunitytohavehisclaimreviewed.SeeBurfordv.State,845S.W.2d204,208(Tenn.1992).Thepetitioner  hasstatednoreasonswhydueprocessrequiresthestatuteoflimitationsnotbeappliedtohiscase.Wefindthepetitionisbarredbythestatuteoflimitations..&.&+& X/XX X/However,thelowercourtreviewedthepetitionersclaimandfound   theindictmentsufficient.Weagreethattheindictmentwassufficienttonotifythepetitioneroftheoffensecharged.Theindictmentstatedthepetitioner didunlawfullysexuallypenetrate[victim],whoislessthanthirteen(13)yearsofage.&&0,X XX, X0# X/XXX/#&   &TheindictmentinHillstatedthatthedefendant didunlawfullysexuallypenetrate  thevictim.Statev.Hill,954S.W.2d725,727(Tenn.1997).&&+&&&The&&+&&O&+&&&U&&+&&u&&r&+&&&&&+&&&+&&&S&&+&&supremecourt  foundthislanguage&+&&&tobe&&+&&sufficient&+&&&and&&+&&,thereforetheindictmen&+&&&i&&+&&tinthiscasewassufficient.&+&.&.&.&.&.&.&,&,&.&.&.&.& Accordingly,thejudgmentofthetrialcourt&&s&& &dismissingthepetition &isaffirmedpursuanttoCourtofCriminalAppealsRule20.!&!& !&!&.&.&!&!&-&-&.&.&.&.& !&!&  !&!& h     ________________________________    h     JAMESCURWOODWITT,JR.,JUDGECONCUR:_______________________________!&!&JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,!&!&JUDGE_______________________________!&!&ALANE.GLENN,!&!&JUDGE