ÿWPCÿ ¬b…LµW ûrS~Ü êkoçëÐ*ÕÔE[5†p0ÿ¦²[~‡ÜzOðhGÏb4_1<÷´ÓÛÀz­¨rϰ|Ë·¦JD½¡1÷z™.éyü V¨×Cšd©š †µÞTàN8sÊ~×Öæh‡B2ú_=)¡øƒ©Ò‰Ôñ;W”׈ÖèP/Ù|X®i~–¿ÿ8ýòÕ{Š=hF† (ƒ\2IdDö Ž2rv7¾Xì©#tVÑùÒ&%62áê`9™dh«äó6¡lV˜ £._^,nLóÈÿºG:@ñµ „îúyrX!3´É(ø{AUžRÛ­d¾Á•ƒ:A’bpŸHg·ùÙˆD ÿ~' ñ\J næ‹åèÊçÝæï^›¼¨×à–²æåbLÔI/Ñ‚(\ £pò_îIb–¬´”iÄÞÉbÆ'W*¡ªÈÎÀhhôµË°£ìs¦»©=Z<íEfC袜u_âÔ øi†ÓR¨Wz£¯¢'©ÒÈAE˜!ïæ;jùi¨^$ãW¥ŠÃb@=#j?ô# ÷žG1¿¹ŽÐá>̇dJÑ÷÷ §|Ð*b!¦u!6¨Õ"UT¤y¶H‰ÇžeZ#våíÀfdFvŠ•»|7*gK×S™…# F UNQ %Ÿ 0(¥ LÍ Ð 0lé w@U 4• © U:¸ 0Dò U:6lpU:ÜU:{PU:ËwU:|w¶è-U:éOU:888rLzz BÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆ D3ããã 0D AOZÆ©© 0Do D/³ Bâ˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLlÎ(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT ÆÒ°ÒÔ€ Xd´XXXÔÝ ƒüÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ýà ¸ àHobson€and€Bowlin€testified€to€these€events€at€trial.€€HobsonÐ ° Ðpleaded€guilty€to€exercising€control€over€stolen€property€valued€at€more€thanÏ$10,000€and€received€three€years€on€probation.€€At€the€time€of€Clardyððs€trial,€heÏwas€awaiting€trial€in€Mississippi€on€embezzlement€charges.€€Bowlin€was€notÏindicted.€((3üÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó žŸD D¡U¢D£¤D¥¦Ó€°uM%þ3|x», øð AZ"Arial Regular(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó, øð AZ"Arial Regular bÒ°ÒÔ€Xd´XXXÔÝ ƒüÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ýà ¸ àAt€trial,€Spencer€testified€that€the€cartons€numbered€1,381.€€OurÐ ° Ðcalculations€based€on€the€summary€indicate€that€the€number€was€1,364.€€TheÏactual€number€is€not€of€any€particular€significance€in€this€instance., øð AZ"Arial Regular,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular qÒ°ÒÔ€XsXXXÔÝ ƒüÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ýà ¸ àThis€case€is€before€us€on€a€grant€of€a€delayed€appeal.€€TheÐ ° Ðdefendant€was€sentenced€on€August€18,€1995.€No€motion€for€new€trial€was€filed.€ÏOn€September€14,€1997,€the€trial€court€found€that€the€defendant€had€receivedÏineffective€assistance€of€counsel€and€was€entitled€to€a€delayed€appeal.€ÏAppointed€counsel€filed€a€motion€for€new€trial€and€an€amended€motion€for€newÏtrial.€€The€trial€court€denied€the€motions€on€August€22,€1997,€and€the€notice€ofÏappeal€was€filed€four€days€later., øð AZ"Arial Regular mÒ°ÒÔ€Xd´XXXÔÝ ƒüÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ýà ¸ àThe€rule€provides€that€If€one€or€more€elements€of€an€offense€areÐ ° Ðcommitted€in€one€county€and€other€elements€are€committed€in€a€second€county,Ïthe€state€may€prosecute€the€offense€in€either€county.€€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€18(b)., øð AZ"Arial Regular mÒ°ÒÔ€ Xd´XXXÔÝ ƒüÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ýà ¸ àThe€rule€provides€that€if€one€or€more€elements€of€an€offense€areÐ ° Ðcommitted€in€one€county€and€other€elements€are€committed€in€a€second€county,Ïthe€state€may€prosecute€the€offense€in€either€county.€€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€18(b). ÞÔ€X@XXXXÔÔ€Ÿ:XX@XÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X@XXŸ:ÔÐ  ÐÌJanuary€14,€1999ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAMÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular ßÔ€X@XXXXÔÔ€Ÿ:XX@XÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X@XXŸ:ÔÐ  ÐÌDecember€22,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAMÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial RegularC:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT d'ÿÿdxd(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýñ¦ñ›ñ¦ñÒ°Òò òÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€ XsXXXÔÑ7€ÜÐXdðXXdð7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  Ññ°ññ¦ñßr€*<,(j 8` `€€@Eȱ` 8ttxP°ð  rßñ¦ññ°ññ°ñßr€*<,(j 8` `€€@Eȱ` 8ttxP°ð  rßñ°ññ¦ñ›ñ¦ñà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÌÌ€à@@@'àAT€NASHVILLEˆÐ à Ðó óÌò òà@ÓÓ"àSEPTEMBER€1998€SESSIONó óˆÐ pÀ ÐÌÌÌò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à h àà À àó ó)à  àNo.€01C01„9710„CC„00457Ð 0 € Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àÐ  p  Ðà ` àAppelleeà  àà h àà À à)à  àÐ `  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àMontgomery€CountyÐ P  Ðvs.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àà p àÐ ð@  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àHonorable€John€H.€Gasaway,€JudgeÐ à0  Ðò òHARRY€D.€CLARDY,à h àà À àó ó)Ð Ð  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  à(Theft€of€property)Ð À Ðà ` àAppellant.à  àà h àà À à)à  àÐ ° Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àÌÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à h àà À àà  àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:Ð pÀ ÐÌGREGORY€SMITHà  àà h àà À àà  àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPÐ P  Ð(On€Appeal€Only)à  àà h àà À àà  àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÐ @ ÐAssistant€Public€Defenderà h àà À àà  àà p àÐ 0€ ÐOne€Public€Squareà  àà h àà À àà  àKAREN€M.€YACUZZOÐ  p ÐSuite€321à ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÐ ` ÐClarksville,€TN€37040à h àà À àà  àCriminal€Justice€DivisionÐ P Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à425€Fifth€Ave.€NorthÌN.€REESE€BAGWELLà h àà À àà  à2d€Floor,€Cordell€Hull€Bldg.Ð à0 Ð(At€Trial)à ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àNashville,€TN€37243„0493à x àÐ Ð  ÐAttorney€at€LawÌ116€S.€Second€St.à  àà h àà À àà  àJOHN€WESLEY€CARNEY,€JR.Ð °"  ÐClarksville,€TN€37040€€à h àà À àà  àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÐ  #ð! Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àARTHUR€BIEBERÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à204€Franklin€St.,€Suite€200Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àClarksville,€TN€37040ÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€____________________ÌÌÌò òAFFIRMEDó óÐ Ð/ +. ÐÌÌJAMES€CURWOOD€WITT,€JR.€ÌJUDGEÌÌÌÐ  `6°15W ÐÓ  Óà@qq*àò òOPINIONÓÓÓlX°X°` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXlÓó óˆÐ ° Ðà ¸ àThe€defendant,€Harry€D.€Clardy,€appeals€pursuant€to€Rule€3€of€theÏTennessee€Rules€of€Appellate€Procedure€from€his€judgment€of€conviction€in€theÏCriminal€Court€of€Montgomery€County€for€exercising€control€over€stolen€propertyÏvalued€at€more€than€$10,000,€a€Class€C€felony.€He€was€sentenced€to€serve€fifteenÏyears€in€the€Department€of€Correction€as€a€Range€III,€persistent€offender.€In€thisÏappeal,€the€defendant€contends€that€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€establish€that€theÏgoods€stolen€were€worth€more€than€$10,000€and€that€the€trial€in€MontgomeryÏCounty€Circuit€Court€violated€due€process€because€the€theft€occurred€in€DavidsonÏCounty.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð à ÐÌà ¸ àThe€proof€introduced€at€trial€shows€that€on€October€25,€1994€€BobbyÏGray,€an€ex„police€officer,€became€suspicious€when€he€saw€the€driver€of€a€tractor„¼trailer€truck€attempt€to€back€into€a€parking€lot€at€Bellamy€Auction€in€Clarksville.€€TheÏtruck€missed€the€turn€and€went€into€a€ditch.€€The€back€doors€came€open€and€severalÏboxes€fell€out.€€He€recognized€the€defendant€who€was€standing€alongside€theÏvehicle€trying€to€guide€it€into€the€lot.€€Gray€called€the€police€on€his€cellular€phone.€ÏHe€continued€to€watch€as€the€driver€jockeyed€the€truck€back€and€forth€in€hisÏunsuccessful€attempt€to€back€into€the€lot.€€Just€as€the€police€arrived,€the€driverÏpulled€the€truck€into€the€street€near€the€curb.€€When€the€officers€ran€the€VINÏnumbers€they€discovered€that€the€tractor€belonged€to€L€&€M€Enterprises€inÏMississippi,€that€the€trailer€was€owned€by€Dollar€General€Stores€Inc.,€and€that€L€&ÏM€did€not€deliver€for€Dollar€General€Stores.€€At€that€time,€neither€business€wasÏaware€of€the€theft€of€its€property.€€The€police€arrested€the€defendant€and€Bobby€JoeÏHobson,€the€truck€driver.€€Ð °1-0 Їà ¸ àThe€resulting€police€investigation€discovered€that€Hobson,€anÏemployee€of€L€&€M,€left€Mississippi€on€Oct.€23€with€a€load€of€furniture€to€be€deliveredÏin€Detroit.€€Hobson€had€become€seriously€addicted€to€crack€cocaine,€and€instead€ofÏproceeding€to€Detroit,€he€stopped€in€Nashville€and€sold€the€contents€of€the€trailer€forÏ$1,400.€€He€abandoned€the€empty€trailer€in€a€lot€and€spent€the€money€on€crack.€ÏDuring€the€course€of€the€evening,€he€encountered€the€defendant€and€a€womanÏnamed€Mary€Bowlin.€€When€the€money€ran€out,€Clardy€suggested€that€they€pick€upÏa€loaded€trailer€from€the€lot€at€RAM„3€Distribution€Services.€€Hobson€followedÏClardyððs€directions€to€the€lot€and€selected€a€loaded,€sealed€trailer.€€Hobson€attachedÏthe€trailer€to€the€ð ðbobtail,ðð€and€the€threesome€drove€to€Clarksville€where€theyÏattempted€to€sell€the€contents€of€the€trailer€at€Bellamy€Auction.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Hobson€and€BowlinÐ ¨ø Ðboth€testified€that,€at€one€point,€they€decided€to€abandon€the€trailer.€€They€emptiedÏsome€of€the€cartons€and€packed€the€goods€in€the€sleeper.€€Hobson,€however,€€hadÏbroken€a€pin€in€the€ð ðfifth€wheelðð€when€he€attached€the€trailer,€and€he€was€unable€toÏrelease€the€mechanism.€€Clardy€managed€to€sell€a€few€of€the€loose€items€along€theÏroad.€ÌÌà ¸ àAccording€to€Nancy€Bellamy,€Clardy€came€to€Bellamy€Auction€at€aboutÏ3:00€p.m.€on€Oct.€25€and€offered€to€sell€her€the€contents€of€the€trailer.€€€He€showedÏher€a€blanket,€a€kerosene€lamp,€and€a€tea€kettle.€€She€asked€him€if€he€had€a€bill€ofÏsale,€and€when€he€said€that€he€did,€she€agreed€to€take€a€look€at€the€merchandise.€ÏBecause€of€the€difficulties€Hobson€encountered€in€trying€to€back€into€the€parking€lotÏand€the€arrival€of€the€police,€she€never€actually€saw€any€of€the€merchandise€in€theÏvehicle.ÌÌà ¸ àAt€trial,€Mark€Spencer,€Dollar€General€Corporationððs€traffic€œmanagerñ‘ñ,ñ‘ñ›Ïtestified€that€the€trailer€itself€was€worth€approximately€$7,000.€€He€submitted€aÐ h3¸.4 Ðdetailed€summary€sheet€which€specified€the€exact€contents€of€the€trailer€and€theirÏvalue.€€According€to€the€summary,€the€trailer€contained€1,364€cartons€valued€atÏ$47,089.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€When€he€examined€the€trailer,€approximately€30€or€40€of€the€cartonsÐ H˜ Ðwere€missing;€however,€the€cabððs€sleeper€was€packed€full€of€blankets€and€otherÏitems.€ÌÌà ¸ àAfter€hearing€the€testimony,€the€jury€found€the€defendant€guilty€of€theftÏof€property€valued€at€more€than€$10,000.€€The€defendant€now€complains€that€theÏevidence€at€trial€is€legally€insufficient€to€support€his€conviction.€€We€disagree.ÌÌà ¸ àWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€anÏappellate€courtððs€standard€of€review€€is,€whether€after€considering€the€evidence€inÏthe€light€most€favorable€to€the€prosecution,€any€rational€trier€of€fact€could€have€foundÏthe€essential€elements€of€the€crime€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòJackson€v.Ð  \ ÐVirginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€317€(1979);€òòState€v.€Duncanóó,€698€S.W.2d€63,€67€(Tenn.Ð Ø( Ð1985);€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€€13(e).€€Because€a€jury€conviction€removes€the€presumptionÏof€innocence€with€which€a€defendant€is€initially€cloaked€and€replaces€it€with€one€ofÏguilt,€a€convicted€defendant€has€the€burden€of€demonstrating€on€appeal€that€theÏevidence€is€insufficient.€€òòState€v,€Tuggleóó,€639€S.W.2d€913,€914€(Tenn.€1982).€€OnÐ %X $ Ðappeal,€the€ññœñññŒñSñŒñññsññtateññ›ññ€is€entitled€to€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€and€allÏreasonable€or€legitimate€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€therefrom.€€òòState€v.€Harrisóó,Ð  (ð#( Ð839€S.W.2d€54,€75€(Tenn.€1992).€€ÌÌà ¸ àIn€determining€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€this€court€should€notÏreweigh€or€reevaluate€the€evidence.€€òòState€v.€Matthewsóó,€805€S.W.2d€250,€œ253ñ¡ñÐ Ð/ +0 Ðñ¡ññ¢ñÐ  œ1ì,2 Ðñ¢ñ(Tenn.›€Crim.€App.€Tenn.€1990).€€Questions€concerning€the€credibility€of€theÏwitnesses,€the€weight€and€value€of€the€evidence,€as€well€as€all€factual€issues€raisedÏby€the€evidence€are€resolved€by€the€trier€of€fact.€€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2dÐ 45„06 Ð833,€835€(Tenn.€1978).€€This€court€may€not€substitute€its€inferences€for€those€drawnÏby€the€trier€of€fact€from€the€evidence.€€òòLiakas€v.€Stateóó,€199€Tenn.€298,€286€S.W.2dÐ |Ì Ð856,859€œ(1956),›€òòcertóó.€òòdeniedóó€325€U.S.€845,€77€S.€Ct.€39€(1956);€€òòFarmer€v.€Stateóó,Ð H˜ Ð574€S.W.2d€2d€49,€51€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1978).€€It€is€the€appellate€courtððs€duty€toÏaffirm€the€conviction€if€the€evidence,€viewed€under€these€standards,€was€sufficientÏfor€any€rational€trier€of€fact€to€have€found€the€essential€elements€of€the€offensesÏbeyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€317,€99€S.€œCñžñtñžññŸñTñŸñ.›€2781,Ð xÈ  Ð2789;€òòState€v.€Cazesóó,€875€S.W.2d€253,€259€(Tenn.€1994);€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(e).€Ð D”  ÐÌœñ ñÌñ ñ›à ¸ àThe€defendant€contends€that€the€record€does€not€prove€that€the€valueÏof€the€stolen€property€exceeded€$10,000.€€Our€legislature€has€defined€theft€ofÏproperty€as€follows:ÌÓÓà8 ¸ àA€person€commits€theft€of€property€if,€with€intent€toÏdeprive€the€owner€of€property,€the€person€knowinglyÏobtains€or€exercises€control€over€the€property€withoutÏthe€ownerððs€effective€consent.Ð ¸ x¸ x ÐÌÓÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„14„103€(1997).€€Another€section€grades€the€offense€of€theftÏaccording€to€the€value€of€the€property€involved.€€Theft€is€a€Class€D€felony€if€the€valueÏof€the€property€obtained€is€more€than€$1,000€but€less€than€$10,000.€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€39„14„105(3)€(1997).€€If€the€property€is€valued€at€more€than€$10,000€but€lessÏthan€$60,000,€theft€is€a€Class€C€felony.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„14„105(4).ÌÌà ¸ àBobby€Gray,€Nancy€Bellamy,€and€one€other€witness€testified€that€theÏdefendant€was€with€the€stolen€vehicle€and€that€he€attempted€to€sell€at€least€someÏof€its€contents.€€Bobby€Hobson€and€Mary€Bowlin€testified€that€the€defendant€directedÏthem€to€the€lot€where€the€trailer€was€parked,€that€he€was€present€when€the€trailerÏwas€stolen,€that€he€rode€with€them€to€Clarksville,€and€that€he€actively€œparticipatedñ£ñÏñ£ññ¤ñÐ  ¶0,1 Ðñ¤ñin›€the€attempts€to€dispose€of€the€stolen€merchandise.€€The€representative€of€theÏDollar€General€Stores€testified€that€the€trailer€itself€was€worth€about€$7,000.€€TheÏcompany€records€introduced€at€trial€indicate€the€value€of€the€merchandise€was€moreÏthan€œ$47,000.›€ÌÓÓÐ ²95; ÐÓÓà ¸ àAlthough€it€is€true€that€there€is€no€direct€proof€that€the€trailer€wasÏactually€loaded€with€the€merchandise,€a€criminal€offense€may€be€establishedÏexclusively€by€circumstantial€evidence.€€€€òòDuchac€v.€Stateóó,€505€S.W.2d€237€(Tenn.Ð H˜ Ð1973);€òòState€v.€Jonesóó,€901€Ô‡Xd´XX Xd´ÔS.W.2dÔ#† Xd´XXXd´j2#Ô€393,€396€Ô‡Xd´XX Xd´Ô(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€19Ô#† Xd´XXXd´¼2#Ô95);€òòState€v.Ð  d ÐLequireóó,€634€S.W.2d€608€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).€€The€circumstantial€evidence€inÐ à 0 Ðthe€record€is€more€than€sufficient€for€a€rational€jury€to€conclude€that€the€cartonsÏlisted€on€the€summary€sheet€were€actually€loaded€onto€the€trailer.€ÌÌà ¸ àFirst,€Hobson€testified€that€he€and€the€defendant€looked€for€a€trailerÏwith€a€òòsealóó€because€they€knew€that€a€seal€indicated€that€the€trailer€was€full.€€He€alsoÐ Ü, Ðtestified€that€he€removed€the€seal€from€the€trailer€and€threw€it€away.€€HobsonÏdescribed€the€trailer€as€being€filled€with€cartons€ð ðfrom€top€to€bottom€and€front€toÏback.ðð€€Nancy€Bellamy€and€Bobby€Gray€saw€cartons€fall€out€of€the€truck€when€itÏbacked€into€the€ditch.€€Charles€William€Poff€testified€that€the€defendant€approachedÏhim€with€a€blanket€and€a€kerosene€lamp€and€asked€him€where€he€could€sell€aÏtruckload€of€such€merchandise.€€Moreover,€the€summary€provided€by€Dollar€GeneralÏStores€indicates€that€the€cartons€contained€a€variety€of€merchandise€includingÏblankets,€kerosene€lamps,€and€tea€kettles.€€Piles€of€blankets€and€other€items€wereÏfound€in€the€cab€of€the€truck.€€ÌÌà ¸ àThe€defendant€contends€that€both€Hobson€and€Bowlin€are€liars€andÏthat€their€testimony€is€incredible.€€This€court,€however,€does€not€determine€theÏcredibility€of€the€witnesses€or€the€weight€and€value€of€the€evidence€€òòState€v.Ð 8,ˆ', ÐCabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€833,€835€(Tenn.€1978).€€€The€jury€as€the€trier€of€fact€resolvesÐ .T). Ðany€conflicts€in€the€testimony€as€well€as€issues€of€credibility€and€weight.€€òòIdóó.€€In€thisÐ Ð/ +0 Ðinstance,€the€jury€accredited€the€evidence€presented€by€the€stateððs€witnesses€andÏresolved€the€conflicting€testimony€in€favor€of€the€state.ÌÌà ¸ àThe€evidence€is€more€than€sufficient€to€prove€beyond€a€reasonableÏdoubt€that€the€goods€described€in€the€Dollar€General€Storesðð€paperwork€was€in€theÐ Ì84: Ðtrailer€when€Hobson€and€the€defendant€removed€it€from€the€RAM„3€lot€in€NashvilleÏwithout€the€consent€of€its€owner.€€The€evidence€is€also€legally€sufficient€to€show€thatÏthe€defendant€unlawfully€and€knowingly€exercised€control€over€the€stolen€propertyÏin€Clarksville.€€According€to€Dollar€Generalððs€invoices,€the€value€of€the€load€was€inÏexcess€of€œ$47ñ›ñ9ñ›ñ,000.›€€The€trailer€was€valued€at€$7,000.€€We€find€that€the€stateÏestablished€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€the€value€of€the€stolen€property€wasÏgreater€than€$10,000.€€The€defendantððs€challenge€to€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidenceÏis€without€merit.ÌÌà ¸ àIn€his€amended€motion€for€new€trial,€the€defendant€contended€that€theÏtrial€court€lacked€jurisdiction€to€try€him€in€Montgomery€County€as€the€theft€occurredÏin€Davidson€County.€€On€appeal,€he€argues€that€Rule€18€of€the€Tennessee€RulesÏof€Criminal€Procedure€violates€due€process€because€it€allows€a€case€to€be€tried€inÏmultiple€venues.€€It€is€well€established€in€this€state€that€a€party€may€not€take€oneÏposition€regarding€an€issue€in€the€trial€court,€change€its€strategy€or€theory€inÏmidstream,€and€advocate€a€different€ground€or€reason€in€this€Court.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.Ð ¤ô ÐAucoinóó,€756€S.W.2d€705,€715€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988),€òòState€v.€Dobbinsóó,€754Ð p!À  ÐS.W.2d€637,€641€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988).€€Therefore,€the€issue€is€waived.€€òòSeeóóÐ <#Œ" ÐTenn.€R.€App.€P.€36(a).€€ÌÌà ¸ àMoreover,€the€general€rule€is€that€an€offense€shall€be€prosecuted€inÏthe€county€where€the€offense€was€committed.€€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€17(a).€€In€thisÏinstance,€the€defendant€€was€charged€with€theft€by€exercising€control€over€theÏloaded€Dollar€General€box€trailer€in€Montgomery€County€with€the€intent€to€œdepriveñœñÐ  .T). Ðñœñññ›€ññthe›€Dollar€General€Stores€of€that€property.€€The€proof€at€trial€overwhelminglyÏdemonstrates€that€he€was€in€possession€of€the€property€and€that€he€exercisedÏcontrol€over€that€property.€€He€showed€the€merchandise€which€he€and€his€co„¼defendant€removed€from€the€cartons€to€at€least€two€persons€in€an€attempt€to€sell€it,Ïand,€in€fact,€he€sold€a€few€of€the€items€for€twenty€dollars.€€Without€question,€theseÏactions€took€place€in€Montgomery€County.€€Even€though€the€trailer€was€stolen€fromÏa€lot€in€Davidson€County,€the€defendant€committed€the€offense€for€which€he€wasÏindicted€in€Montgomery€County.€€On€these€facts,€no€viable€issue€exists€concerningÏeither€the€trial€courtððs€jurisdiction€or€the€constitutionality€of€Rule€18(b).ñ¥ñœ×ƒ×ñ¥ññ¥ñ׃×ñ¥ñÝ ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×›€Ð ` ÐÌà ¸ àFor€the€reasons€discussed€above,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trialÏcourt.ÌÓÓà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à______________________________Ìà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJAMES€CURWOOD€WITT,€JR.,€JudgeÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌ______________________________ÌGARY€R.€WADE,€Presiding€JudgeÌÌÌÌ______________________________ÌTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JudgeÌ