ÿWPCÎ áCÂ|wL%s§Øò ]k`‚=™ïõ¥Û«°!¹î^è·\à"¿ex”5ƱXb@Iþ2’¾ÎÓµ Â47ý‡u'0f¬'¤ÞxÖãñ‘+ÎÁÏ-ïéõŒ[ÁÀF}Çc²ÞBy+Ä®?¯!w<ÕFÎó_)ºÒÙæé"§Yÿ=¶Á[-„!^Ëc.êÇ`èÑksS®7f~jŠä SÏ@·äú  Ýý [ªÖÙœö‚Ͷ~óñkkf—Ïà•¢tá9ámE±ª6É‚›>¬µ¨k{ñk« 9>ÓÆ:£ *—ƒ‹n†—ô¨9®>Òó„?þxþùazÈ)àxQƒî£YkQß®hQZ 1Ír|·ÁÁnuW+-·¼à/LŸÞ²¾Y‰R^ÓÚµ¬6'T’{Q^š"ˈ]lމÕb‚Ž)x©)¡Ü“xÓP( # šUN¥ %ó 0(ùU:!b[w@c4£·Æ˜HP LaserJet 5/5M - StandardHPPCL5G,,,,0nLÈÍ(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡,Ù¹6 AZ‹"Arial Regular- ù- 5E6789H:;<{=>eNƒK&3|x>Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýñ>ñ›ñ>ñÑ` °ÑÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€ŠÅDŠXXÔÔ€ŠSÍŠŠŠÅDÔÑTR[¬ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ€ÑÑ7€¾ŠXXdðdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÓ  Óò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÐ `  ÐÌAT€NASHVILLEÌÌJANUARY€SESSION,€1999ÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓGARRY€E.€COLLINS,à h àà À àà  à)à p àC.C.A.€NO.€01C01„9806„CR„00240€Ð €  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àó óÐ „$  Ðà ` àà ¸ àAppellant,ò òà h àà À àà  à)à p àÐ ˆ(  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àWILSON€COUNTYÐ Œ,  ÐV.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)€€€€€€€Ð 0  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àÐ ”4  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àHON.€BOBBY€CAPERS,€JUDGE€€€€ó óÐ ˜8 Ðò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,€à À àà  à)à p àÐ œ< Ðó óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àò òà  à)ó óà p àÐ  @ Ðà ` àà ¸ àAppellee.à h àà À àò òà  à)à p à(POST„CONVICTION)Ð ¤D Ðó óÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à h àà À àà  àòòà p àFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:Ð ´T ÐÌò òB.€KEITH€WILLIAMS€à h àà À àà  àà p àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUP€Ð ¼ \ Ðó óAttorney€at€Law€à  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÐ À!` ÐÌò òBRODY€N.€KANEó óà  àà h àà À àà  àò òà p àTIMOTHY€BEHAN€Ð È#h Ðó óAttorney€at€Lawà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÐ Ì$l ÐTaylor,€Taylor,€Lannom€&€Williamsà  àà p à2nd€Floor,€Cordell€Hull€BuildingÐ Ð%p Ð102€East€Main€Streetò òà h àó óà À àà  àà p à425€Fifth€Avenue€North€Ð Ô&t ÐLebanon,€TN€37087à h àà À àà  àà p àNashville,€TN€€37243Ð Ø'x ÐÌò òà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àó óà À àà  àà p àò òTOM€P.€THOMPSON,€JR.Ð à)€  Ðó óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÐ ä*„!! Ðà ` àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òDAVID€DURHAMÐ ì,Œ## Ðó óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÐ ð-$$ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à119€South€College€StreetÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àLebanon,€TN€37087„3609ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED€________________________ÌÌAFFIRMED€PURSUANT€TO€RULE€20ÌÌTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGEÐ  $;Ä11 ÐÓ  ÓÔ€°@°ŠŠSÍÔò òòòORDERóóó óÔ€ŠSÍŠ°°@ÔÐ `  ÐÌÌÓ  ÓÓÓà ` àà ¸ àIn€this€case,€the€Petitioner/Appellant,€Garry€E.€Collins,€appeals€the€orderÏof€the€Wilson€County€Criminal€Court€dismissing€his€petition€for€post„conviction€relief.€ÏPetitioner€argues€that€his€trial€counsel€was€ineffective.€€ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àAfter€a€full€hearing,€the€trial€court€found€in€its€order€denying€the€petitionÏfor€post„conviction€relief,€that€the€testimony€of€two€attorneys€who€representedÏPetitioner€at€the€trial€court€proceedings,€ð ðclearly€and€ñ>ñconcvincinglyñ>ññ>ñconvincinglyñ>ñðð€rebutted€theÏtestimony€of€the€Petitioner€and€his€mother€on€each€allegation€raised€by€Petitioner€inÏhis€pleadings€and€orally€from€the€witness€stand.€€The€trial€court€specifically€found€thatÏthe€clear€and€convincing€weight€of€the€evidence€was€contrary€to€the€allegationsÏmade€by€Petitioner,€and€that€his€claims€of€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel€wereÏwithout€merit.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àIn€this€pñ6ñroceeding,€the€action€of€the€trial€judge€was€not€a€determinationÏof€guilt,€and€the€evidence€in€the€record€does€not€preponderate€against€the€findingsÏof€the€trial€judge.€€Furñ6ññ8ñthñ8ññ8ññ7ñgñ7ññ8ññ7ññ6ñhñ6ññ7ññ8ññ6ñtñ6ññ8ññ6ñermore,€ñ6ññ9ññ6ñthere€is€ñ6ññ9ññ6ñno€error€of€law€requiring€a€reversal€of€the€judgmentÏñ6ññ:ñis€ñ:ññ6ñapparent€on€the€record.€€ñ6ññ;ñAccordingly,€it€is€hereby€ordered€that€the€ñ;ññ5ññ4ñorñ4ññ5ññ6ñOn€October€7,€1992,€Petitioner€pled€guilty€to€first€degree€felonyÏmurder€and€was€sentenced€to€life€imprisonment.€€Defendant€filed€a€petition€for€post„conviction€relief€on€September€25,€1995.€€On€March€13,€1997,€a€panel€of€this€CourtÏreversed€the€trial€courtððs€summary€diñ6ññ;ñsmissal€of€the€petition€and€remanded€for€a€hearing.€€òòSeeóóÐ È-h$# Ðñ;ñòòñ;ñGarry€E.€Collinsñ;ñóóñ;ñjudgment€of€theÐ È-h$# Ðtrial€court€is€affirmed€in€accordance€with€Rule€20€of€the€Court€of€Criminal€Appeals€ofÏñ;ññ<ññ;ñTennesseeñ;ññ<ññ<ñTennesseeñ<ññ;ñ.Ìñ;ññ;ñ,Ð È-h$# ÐC.C.A.€No.Ð È-h$# Ð01C01›„9603„CR„00120,›€Wilson›€County›€(Tenn.›€Crim.›€App.,›€Nashville,›€Mar.›€13,›€1997).›€›€Petitioner›€then›€filed›Ïan›€amendeñ;ññ=ñd›€petition€for€post„conviction€relief€on€March€4,€1998.€€Following€an€evidentiaryÏhearing,€the€trial€court€dismissed€Petitionerððs€petition€on€March€6,€1998.€€In€thisÏappeal,€Petitioner€contends€that€his€guilty€plea€was€the€product€of€ineffectiveÏassistance€of€counsel.Ð ø9˜0/ Їà ` àIn€post„conviction€proceedings,€the€burden€is€on€the€petitioner€to€prove€hisÏgrounds€for€relief€by€clear€and€convincing€evidence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„30„¼210(f).€€This€Court€must€give€the€findings€of€the€trial€court€the€weight€of€a€jury€verdict,Ïand€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€will€not€be€reversed€unless€the€evidence€containedÏin€the€record€preponderates€against€the€findings€of€fact€made€by€the€trial€court.€€òòStateÐ €  Ðv.€Bufordóó,€666€S.W.2d€473,€475€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1983).Ð ˆ(  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àÌà ` àIn€determining€whether€counsel€provided€effective€assistance€at€trial,€the€courtÏmust€decide€whether€counselððs€performance€was€within€the€range€of€competenceÏdemanded€of€attorneys€in€criminal€cases.€€òòBaxter€v.€Roseóó,€523€S.W.2d€930,€936Ð ¨H Ð(Tenn.€1975).€To€succeed€on€a€claim€that€his€counsel€was€ineffective€at€trial,€aÏpetitioner€bears€the€burden€of€showing€that€his€counsel€made€errors€so€serious€thatÏhe€was€not€functioning€as€counsel€as€guaranteed€under€the€Sixth€Amendment€andÏthat€the€deficient€representation€prejudiced€the€petitioner€resulting€in€a€failure€toÏproduce€a€reliable€result.€€òòStrickland€v.€Washingtonóó,€466€U.S.€668,€693,€104€S.€Ct.Ð Ð%p Ð2052,€80€L.€Ed.€2d€674,€òòrehððgóó€òòdeniedóó,€467€U.S.€1267€(1984);€òòCooper€v.€Stateóó,€849Ð Ø'x ÐS.W.2d€744,€747€(Tenn.€1993);€òòButler€v.€Stateóó,€789€S.W.2d€898,€899€(Tenn.€1990).€Ð à)€  ÐTo€satisfy€the€second€prong€the€petitioner€must€show€a€reasonable€probability€that,Ïbut€for€counselððs€unreasonable€error,€the€fact€finder€would€have€had€reasonableÏdoubt€regarding€petitionerððs€guilt.€€òòStricklandóó,€466€U.S.€at€695.€€This€reasonableÐ ø/˜&& Ðprobability€must€be€ð ðsufficient€to€undermine€confidence€in€the€outcome.ðð€€òòHarris€v.Ð 2 (( ÐStateóó,€875€S.W.2d€662,€665€(Tenn.€1994)€(citation€omitted).€€In€regard€to€guilty€pleas,Ð 4¨** Ðthe€petitioner€must€establish€a€reasonable€probability€that,€but€for€the€errors€ofÏcounsel,€he€would€not€have€entered€into€the€plea.€€òòAdkins€v.€Stateóó,€911€S.W.2d€334,Ð 8¸.. Ð349€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994).Ð  :À00 Ðà ` àÌà ` àWhen€reviewing€trial€counselððs€actions,€this€Court€should€not€use€the€benefitÏof€hindsight€to€second„guess€strategy€and€criticize€counselððs€tactics.€òòHellard€v.€Stateóó,Ð p  Ð629€S.W.2d€4,€9€(Tenn.€1982).€€Counselððs€alleged€errors€should€be€judged€at€theÏtime€they€were€made€in€light€of€all€facts€and€circumstances.€€òòStricklandóó,€466€U.S.€atÐ €  Ð690;€òòseeóó€òòCooperóó,€849€S.W.2d€at€746.Ð ˆ(  ÐÌà ` àInitially,€we€note€that€Petitioner€has€failed€to€include€a€transcript€of€the€guiltyÏplea€hearing.€€It€is€Petitionerððs€duty€to€have€prepared€an€adequate€record€in€order€toÏallow€a€meaningful€review€on€appeal.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(b);€òòState€v.€Ballardóó,€855Ð ¨H ÐS.W.2d€557,€560€(Tenn.€1993);€òòState€v.€Goodwinóó,€909€S.W.2d€35,€43€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð °P ÐApp.€1995).€€Thus,€normally€his€issues€should€be€waived.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.Ð ¸X Ð24(b).€€However,€we€choose€to€address€Petitionerððs€issues€on€the€merits.€€The€StateÏdoes€not€argue€on€appeal€that€there€should€be€a€waiver€for€not€including€theÏtranscript€of€the€guilty€plea€hearing.€€The€State€did,€however,€move€to€make€it€anÏexhibit€at€the€post„conviction€hearing€and€Petitioner€made€no€objection€to€itsÏadmissibility.€€The€trial€court€nonetheless€refused€to€allow€it€at€that€time.€€Hence,€weÏwill€not€consider€Petitionerððs€issues€waived.€€We€find€that€the€transcript€from€theÏguilty€plea€hearing€should€be€made€an€exhibit€upon€remand€at€the€new€hearing€andÏit€should€be€made€part€of€the€record€on€appeal.Ìà ` àÌà ` àAs€to€his€first€issue,€Petitioner€claims€that€his€attorneys€wrongfully€advised€himÏthat€he€would€be€released€after€serving€seven€years€of€his€sentence.€€PetitionerððsÏmother€testified€at€the€hearing€that€the€attorneys€told€her€that€her€son€would€serveÏapproximately€seven€to€seven€and€one„half€years€on€a€guilty€plea€to€felony€murder.€Ð  :À00 ÐBoth€counsel€denied€this,€but€one€of€his€attorneys€testified€that€he€told€Petitioner€thatÏð ð20€years€would€probably€be€the€minimum€he€would€have€to€serve€before€he€wouldÏbe€eligible€for€parole.ðð€€This€attorney€also€said€he€knew€he€advised€Petitioner€that€heÏwould€have€to€serve€30€percent€ð ð[œo]f›€life,€which€was,€I€believe,€calculated€at€60€yearsÏat€the€time.€€So,€whatever€„„€that€would€be€20€years,€is€what€I€told€him.ðð€€ÌÌà ` àThis€Court,€in€òòWalton€v.€Stateóó,€966€S.W.2d€54,€55€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997),Ð 0  Ðheld€that€erroneous€advice€regarding€parole€that€induces€a€defendant€to€forego€hisÏor€her€right€to€a€jury€trial€can€be€used€to€establish€a€claim€of€ineffective€assistanceÏof€counsel.€€If€Petitioner€can€establish€that€his€defense€counsel€did€in€factÏerroneously€advise€him€of€parole€eligibility,€then€he€can€satisfy€the€first€prongÏrequirement€under€òòœStrickland›óó.€€òòIdóó.€€Once€established,€the€burden€still€remains€onÐ ¸X ÐPetitioner€to€show€that€but€for€trial€counselððs€erroneous€advice€he€would€have€notÏpled€guilty.€€€òòIdóó.€€The€trial€court€found€the€following€in€its€Order€denying€PetitionerððsÐ È#h Ðpetition€for€post„conviction€relief:ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à[The€attorneys€who€testified],€two€of€Petitionerððs€fourÏappointed€counsel€at€the€trial€level[,]€testified€as€to€eachÏand€every€allegation€raised€by€the€Petitioner€in€his€PetitionÏand€Amended€Petition,€and€which€Petitioner€raised€orallyÏfrom€the€witness€stand,€and€their€testimony,€accompaniedÏby€the€record€.€.€.€clearly€and€convincingly€rebut€theÏtestimony€of€the€Petitioner€and€his€mother€who€testified€onÏhis€behalf€that€trial€counsel€was€ineffective,€and€that€hisÏguilty€plea€was€therefore€unknowingly€and€involuntarilyÏmade.€€The€Petitioner€has€the€burden€of€provingÏallegations€of€fact€by€clear€and€convincing€evidence,ÏœT.C.A.›€40„30„210(f).€€The€clear€and€convincing€weight€ofÏthe€evidence€is€contrary€to€Petitionerððs€allegations.€ÏConsequently,€all€issues€raised€by€the€Petitioner€as€toÏineffective€assistance€of€counsel€are€without€merit.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÓÖ2Óà ` àÐ 7´-- Ðà ` àThe€trial€court€made€no€specific€finding€as€to€this€specific€issue,€so€we€mustÏremand€this€case€for€a€new€hearing.€€We€note€that€we€do€find€Petitioner€wasÏmisinformed€that€he€would€be€eligible€for€parole€in€20€years€or€30€percent€of€a€sixtyÏyear€sentence.€€At€the€time€the€present€offenses€were€committed,€release€eligibilityÏfor€ð ða€defendant€receiving€a€life€sentence€for€first€degree€murder€shall€occur€afterÏservice€of€sixty€percent€(60%)€of€sixty€(60)€years€less€sentence€credits€earned€andÏretained€by€the€defendant.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„501€(œSupp›.€1991).€€Therefore,ÏPetitioner,€who€did€receive€a€life€sentence€for€first€degree€murder,€would€not€haveÏbeen€eligible€for€release€until€he€had€served€36€years,€less€any€sentence€credits.€ÏPetitionerððs€attorneys€testified€at€the€post„conviction€hearing€that€they€did€not€informÏPetitioner€that€he€could€be€released€after€seven€years,€but€at€least€one€instead€toldÏhim€he€would€be€eligible€for€parole€at€a€30€percent€eligibility€rate€or€after€20€years.€ÏSince€the€attorney€admitted€this€misinformation,€the€first€prong€of€the€òòœStrickland›óóÐ À!` Ðrequirements,€that€the€attorneysðð€performance€was€deficient,€has€been€met.€€ÏHowever,€Petitioner€must€establish€a€reasonable€probability€that,€but€for€the€errorsÏof€counsel,€he€would€not€have€entered€into€the€plea.€€òòSeeóó€òòœAdkins›óó,€911€S.W.2d€atÐ Ø'x Ð349.€€Therefore,€we€remand€this€case€for€the€trial€court€to€determine€whetherÏPetitioner€would€not€have€entered€the€plea€but€for€the€erroneous€œadvice.ñ=ññ<ñ›ñ<ññ=ñÌ›Ìà ` àSecondly,€Petitioner€also€alleges€that€his€trial€attorneys€failed€to€show€him€anyÏdiscovery€material€and€failed€to€include€him€in€defense€preparation.€€Petitionerððs€trialÏattorneys€testified€otherwise€at€the€post„conviction€hearing.€€One€attorney€testifiedÏthat€he€spent€a€total€of€29.5€hours€with€Defendant€either€in€jail€or€in€court.€€HeÏtestified€that€he€went€to€see€Petitioner€at€the€jail€at€least€eight€times€and€spoke€to€himÏon€the€phone€at€least€five€times.€€Both€counsel€testified€that€they€filed€and€argued€43„Ð  :À00 Ð45€motions€pertaining€to€Petitionerððs€case.€€One€attorney€testified€that€he€did€notÏrecall€giving€Petitioner€a€copy€of€his€file,€but€that€the€discovery€was€always€availableÏto€him€and€that€he€always€took€the€file€with€him€when€he€met€with€Petitioner.€€HeÏfurther€said€that€he€did€not€remember€Petitioner€ever€requesting€a€copy€of€the€file.€ÏBoth€attorneys€testified€that€Petitioner€actively€participated€in€preparation€of€hisÏdefense.€€We€find€this€issue€to€be€without€merit.ÌÌà ` àBased€on€all€the€foregoing,€we€reverse€and€remand€for€a€new€hearing,€limitedÏto€the€issue€of€determining€whether€Petitioner€would€not€have€entered€a€guilty€pleaÏbut€for€the€attorneysðð€erroneous€advice€regarding€parole€eligibility.Ìñ=ññ<ñœñ<ññ=ñœñ=ñÌÓÓà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à____________________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JudgeÌÌÌÐ ø9˜0/ ЇCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌDAVID€H.€WELLES,€Judgeà À àÐ t ÐÌÌ___________________________________ÌJERRY€L.€SMITH,€JudgeÌ