WPC gBTfW:D;Xsډ!<^NLUE75֔D,s: bQ(ANgVkڛg&U(y}u[Ã=gtIV鰭\_ fZ&`U-PXN mKΚ3d<Qo`to-uk  ,EM=Dz郆L6(襧Ov]U8L_zFY+^]+>jQL+Y+1I\Bj LXI\sC"0!1T@|>Kwe\m)Srr^QNoYwf/oXE 5L9)䣰B=B*{I҆uo %)wbMha‘ƌ;`<'u@'nxiġS@#vH鏵,9DZTi{x瞽b %\^ b 0nUNwD4H\ zk m # |  _ 0D%NikkEssssssssssssssssssssssssbuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu 0}}}} Bhh 0 D3) D-\ 0K AS' 0 0D A&) (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularJ~'3|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptUHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 60 r Rh$      1  XmX  _zXXmԀUndertheapplicablestatuteatthesentencing,suchdiversionmayhavebeenimproper.Atthecontested  revocationhearing,thedefendantstatedthathehada1994convictionforD.U.I.(drivingundertheinfluence),aClass n Amisdemeanor.PriorconvictionofaClassAmisdemeanoroffensewouldprecludediversionunderTennesseeCode ,| Annotated4035313(a)(1)(A).#XmXz~#ԁLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#$  0   - -(|G2h$ !.8dd8         0  XmX d(|3s$ !.8dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3s$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _8mXXdd8@HHINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @$ATNASHVILLE    June2000Session  XmX #XXm#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.JAMEST.COOPERXmX    @@ DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforLawrenceCounty   @@No.18974StellaL._Hargrove_Ԁ,TrialJudge   @@*AV) ` dE<Y` A Z  @@QQNo.M199901132CCAR3CDFiledAugust2,_2000_Ԁ O  AV) ` dE<` A k     Thedefendantappealsthetrialcourtsrevocationofhisprobation,basedonhisfailingadrugscreen ` andhisdelinquencyinpayingcourtcosts.Weholdthattherecordisinsufficienttosupportthetrial F courtsfindingofdelinquentpayments.However,thefailingofthedrugscreenservedasa , sufficientbasisfortherevocation.Weaffirmthetrialcourtsorder.     Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed   BJohnEverettWilliams,J.#Xm#XmX.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidH.Welles,and Z JerryL.Smith,JJ.,joined. @ RobertH._Stovall_,Jr.,AssistantPublicDefender,Columbia,Tennessee,fortheappellant,JamesT.  \ Cooper. B PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter,ToddR.Kelley,AssistantAttorneyGeneral,T.  MichelBottoms,DistrictAttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee.  @55' OPINION #XXm#XmXԈ <##   Introduction  %X %    Thedefendant,JamesT.Cooper,receivedprobationandjudicialdiversionafterhepled &$"' guiltytoonecountofburglaryandonecountoftheft.Subsequentviolationsresultedinlossofthe ' #( possibilityfordiversion.Later,furtherviolationsledtothetrialcourtsrevokingprobation.The (#) defendantappealsthatrevocation. )$* #XXm #XmX  Background  R+&,    OnSeptember8,1997,afterthedefendantpledguiltytoburglaryandtotheftofproperty -n(. _valuedover$1000#XXm #XmX,theLawrenceCountyCircuitCourtsentencedhimtotwoyearsofprobation.  Thedefendantalsoreceivedjudicial diversion  #  1      ׀contingentonhissuccessfulcompletionofthe  probationaryterm.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035313.Aspartofthesentence,thetrialcourt | orderedthedefendanttomaketwomonthlypayments,$10 indiversionfeesand $25incourtcosts. b Theprobationorderexplicitlyrequiredthatthedefendantpayallrequiredfeesandthatherefrain H fromuseofintoxicantsanddrugs. . ~   ThedefendantwasindictedforfelonytheftofpropertyinJanuary1998,andaprobation  J revocationwarrantwasissuedinAugust1998.Inthiswarrant,ProbationOfficerBethLadner  0 attestedthatthedefendanthadbeensoindictedandthathelastpayedtheordereddiversionfeesin    February1998.Thedefendantpledguiltytothetheftcharge,andthetrialcourt revokedthe    probationandtheposttrialdiversion.Thatcourtthenagainimposedprobation,withoutaprovision   forjudicialdiversion,fortheremainderofthesentencefortheoriginaltwocharges,withcredit x  givenforthetimeservedonprobation,andimposedanadditionalconsecutivetwoyearsof ^  probationforthenewconviction. D    InJune1999, anotherprobationrevocationwarrantwasissued.Inthatwarrant,Ladner ` attestedthatthedefendanthadfailedadrugscreenformarijuanaonApril8,1999,andhadmade F nopaymentstotheCircuitCourtClerkforcostsandfeessinceAugust17,1998. ,   AttherevocationhearinginAugust1999,Ladnertestifiedthatthedefendanthad caught  uponhisearlierdelinquentdiversionfees,abasisforthefirstrevocation.Throughhertestimony,  thestateenteredanaffidavitregardingthedrugscreenanalysis.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035 t 311(c)(1). Z   Thedefendanttestifiedandadmittedthathehadfailedthedrugscreen.Unsureoftheexact &v statusofhispaymentsforthefeesandthecosts,hesaidthathehadbeenpayingthecourts alittle  \ bitofmoney.Hesaidthathisworkintheconstructionfieldwascontinentonfavorableweather, B thatwhenworkinghemadeapproximately $250perweek,andthat$110 perweekofthisamount ( wasobligatedtochildsupportforfourofhischildren.    Thetrialcourtfoundthathehadfailedthedrugscreenandhadwillfullynotmaintainedhis   payments,despiteadequatefinancialcapacity.Thatcourtrevokedprobationandsentencedthe p!  defendanttofouryearsintheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrection. V"!   Analysis  "$r# #XXm #XmX  Thedefendantappealstherevocationofhisprobation.Atrialcourtmayrevokeprobation %>!% andreinstatetheoriginalsentenceonfindingbyapreponderanceoftheevidencethatadefendant &$"& hasviolatedaconditionofprobation,andthisCourtreviewssuchrevocationunderanabuseof ' #' discretionstandard,anabuseevinced onlybyarecorddevoidofsubstantialevidencethataviolation  hasoccurred. S#XXmI#XmXeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035311(d);Statev.Harkins,811S.W.2d79,82(Tenn.  1991);Statev.Gregory,946S.W.2d829,832(Tenn.Crim.App.1997);Statev.Duke,902S.W.2d | 424,427(Tenn.Crim.App.1995)#XXm#XmX. b   Thedefendantassertsthattherecordshowsthathehadreportedeverymonthandhadpaid . ~ someamounteverymonthtowardhiscosts,fines,andfees.Heassertsthathewasnotwillfully  d refusingtopaycostsandfinesandthattheonlyvalidbasisofrevocationwashisfailingadrug  J screenformarijuana.Heassertsthatrevocationforthissolereasonwasnotjustifiedbythe  0   overwhelmingevidencethathehadreportedandpaidregularlyandthatheheldasteadyjoband    supportedfourchildren.       Regardingthefailuretopayfinesandcosts,suchfailuremayconstituteaviolationofthe x  termsofprobationifthetrialcourtdeterminesthatnonpaymentresultsfromwillfulrefusaltopay ^  orfailuretomakesufficientbonafideeffortstopay,SeeStatev.Dye,715S.W.2d36,40(Tenn. D  1986);Statev.Massey,929S.W.2d399,402(Tenn.Crim.App.1996)(citingBeardenv.Georgia, *z  103S.Ct.2064(1983)),butnonpaymentasaconsequenceofalegitimateinabilitytopaymaynot ` constitutethesolebasisforrevocationandsubsequentimprisonment,seeMassey,929S.W.2dat F 402. ,   Althoughthestateadvisedthetrialcourtthatthedefendanthadnotpaidhiscostssince  August1998,astatementconsistentwiththeallegationintheprobationrevocationwarrant,the  submittedrecorddoesnotestablishthatdelinquency.Thedefendanttestifiedthathehadbeen t regularlypayingatleastsomeamounttoacourt.Ladneralsotestifiedthatshehadreceivedreceipts Z fromthedefendant,indicatinghispaymentstothegeneralsessionscourt,althoughthecostsshould @ havebeenpaidtothecircuitcourtclerk.Further,neitherthestatenorthedefendantestablishedthe &v defendantsexpensesandbudgetfortheapproximate$140perweek,forthoseweeksheobtained  \ work,remainingafterpayingchildsupport.Wecannotconcludethattherecordcontainssubstantial B evidenceofwillfulnonpaymentandlackofabonafideefforttomaketherequiredpayments.See ( Statev.ReginaAnnOwen,No.03C019707CC00271(Tenn.Crim.App.filedJune22,1998,at  Knoxville).    Nevertheless,thedefendantsviolationregardingthedrugscreenisavalidbasisfor p!  revocation.Thedefendantsargument,thattherevocationwasnotjustifiedinconsiderationofhis V"! attemptedpayments,steadyemployment,andsupportofhischildren,wouldrequireabalancingtest <#" outsidethescopeofourreview.Wefindnoabuseofdiscretion,andthereforeweaffirmthe "$r# revocationorderfromthetrialcourt.#XXm# %X $    `     h     ______________________________ &*v%)    `     h     JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,JUDGE 4+&* Ї