ÿWPCR ¤ZÛÎ0¦³FqHþÞR• ‚Cm Ó¥ÈR#”ªòŠl1DÜàPF—C·Wä-8uk'r—“¡öýœKmÚáæ<º?SEªÔïEysMîžÙýDmR¡wieþÝE¦ªò‰.×Þ’°)¹=ˆƒ§_£°£Ê'¿  Ĩ/ 3´E™½a;ý 5Mxî·Î uÚÔgt&«1unX4 ù ¼Š'ýã*Ê eFD½§”4"ËTf¹ùøFoühÌç ó‚q\½ÿýák5€ê/áÀÂn‚ñQ²ˆñÈäþ¬“Ü«?l`ÕÅ<µÑéðr0pê{˜I6¼×­¾Ø–ýÒ† .#¢“ÞuÛŽ?>ØÛ‰iþh´ ä4I¶@Ðcèî­Š^ŠÍU¾bÝð_)àqý»oMjµ+¶ »•»óóo(צçm…Åœ»~;.c,j•¿vý…7N­r}1f%˜ I"ñÏn.–èjÊõmî+6;W¾ù ÞŒ±s¬Ö®ÒBѹ "ü;XãaýÅÂî«Æ`>CȘ=—¡oβ°å$€¥LÀ-7GÜÙÐëújÚŒ¾¥ö2fæéê3^8åÛ;AÑQ ÀM¢|3øŸØNÊrk‚4àŽø¡ô¢*Çåù‰s…# F UNQ %Ÿ 0(¥ U!:Í L w@S 4“ § ¶ i¾ 0Æ' 0 Dí1B5©wU: Zp‚‹†U: ‹K ÇÖ$l)ð ,U:ù/30ð72U:'6‹a6U:ì:2&;U :X>ð’> B‚BðŸBðFU:J¹JU:×K D3LLðDL 0D4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P AOxPÆÇPÇP 0DQ D/ÑQ BR˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLÐ(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡, øð AZ"Arial RegularC:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT ä#Då#æ#ç#+è#+é#Dê#î#ï#Dð#Ó€ýhµ&3|xû# _Ò4°ÒÒX°ÒÔ‡X¼XXXÔÔ‡ôcÆôXX¼ÔÝ ƒ %TÿÝÒ44ÒÒXXÒÔ€'ôcÆôôôcÆÔÔ€'ôcÆôô'ôcÆÔà Œ àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝWhile€the€petitioner€claims€that€this€was€the€sole€issue€at€the€first€habitual€criminal€trial€andÐ `  Ðthat€the€same€evidence€was€presented€in€both€habitual€criminal€proceedings,€the€petitioner€did€notÏchallenge€his€prior€convictions€during€the€second€proceeding.€€Ô#†ôMX ôô'ôcÆ#ÔÔ‡ôcÆô ôôMXÔAlso,€as€noted€earlier,€at€the€post„Ð ž > Ðconviction€hearing€the€petitioner€testified€that,€at€the€time€of€his€trials€in€this€case,€his€record€did€in€factÏinclude€the€fourteen€prior€convictions€relied€upon€by€the€State.€Ô#†ôMX ôôôcÆ2#Ô(v(2+Ö$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€'Xj¾XXXÔÔ€'ô5üôX'Xj¾Ôà Œ àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó úÝ ƒ %TÿÝÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€'X¼XXXÔÔ€'ôcÆôX'X¼Ôà Œ àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€record€reflects€that€the€Honorable€John€J.€Duncan,€Judge,€presided€over€the€petitionerððsÐ `  Ðtrial€for€the€substantive€offenses€and€the€petitionerððs€first€three€habitual€criminal€trials.€€The€HonorableÏRandall€E.€Nichols,€Judge,€conducted€the€petitionerððs€final€habitual€criminal€trial,€which€resulted€in€hisÏconviction. 8Ò4°ÒÒX°ÒÔ‡X¼XXXÔÔ‡ôcÆôXX¼ÔÝ ƒ %TÿÝÒ44ÒÒXXÒÔ€'ôcÆôôôcÆÔÔ€'ôcÆôô'ôcÆÔà Œ àòòÚ  Ú6Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝWe€note€that,€with€respect€to€this€issue,€the€petitionerððs€brief€contains€inadequate€citation€toÐ `  Ðauthority€Ô#†ôMX ôô'ôcÆ#ÔÔ‡ôcÆô ôôMXÔpursuant€to€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€27€and€Ct.€of€Crim.€App.€Rule€10,€rendering€the€task€of€thisÐ Ö v Ðcourt€more€difficult.€€Generally,€this€deficiency€results€in€waiver€of€the€issue€before€this€court.€€Ct.€ofÏCrim.€App.€Rule€10(b).€€Nevertheless,€in€the€interests€of€justice€and€in€order€to€afford€the€petitioner€aÏfull€hearing,€we€will€address€the€merits€of€this€issue.€€ ŸÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€X¼XXXÔÔ€ôcÆôXX¼ÔÝ ƒ %TÿÝÒ44ÒÒXXÒÔ€'ôcÆôôôcÆÔÔ€'ôcÆôô'ôcÆÔà Œ àòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€post„conviction€court€additionally€neglected€to€address€this€issue€in€its€memorandumÐ `  Ðopinion€dismissing€the€petition€for€post„conviction€relief., øð AZ"Arial Regular Ñ d Ñ Ý ƒ ÕåÿÝÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€'XL XXXÔÔ€'ôóùôX'XL Ôà Œ àòòÚ  Ú8Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€state€constitutions€of€Indiana€and€Maryland€provide€that€jurors€are€judges€of€law€and€fact.€Ð `  ÐTherefore,€trial€courts€in€those€states€instruct€jurors€on€the€ð ðprerogativeðð€of€nullification€andÏpresumably€defense€counsel€argues€accordingly.€€òòPeople€v.€Douglasóó,€680€N.Y.S.€2d€145,€150€n.1Ð ð  Ð(N.Y.€App.€Div.€1998). úÝ ƒ WÿÝÔ€X\RXXXÔÔ€ôãÎôXX\RÔÒ4°ÒÒX°Òà Œ àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€record€reflects€that€the€Honorable€John€J.€Duncan,€Judge,€presided€over€the€petitionerððsÐ `  Ðtrial€for€the€substantive€offenses€and€the€petitionerððs€first€three€habitual€criminal€trials.€€The€HonorableÏRandall€E.€Nichols,€Judge,€conducted€the€petitionerððs€final€habitual€criminal€trial,€which€resulted€in€hisÏconviction. Ý ƒ %TÿÝÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€'X¼XXXÔÔ€'ôcÆôX'X¼Ôà Œ àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝWe€note€that,€although€the€post„conviction€court€concluded€generally€that€the€petitionerÐ `  Ðreceived€the€effective€assistance€of€counsel,€the€post„conviction€court€did€not€explicitly€address€theÏpetitionerððs€collateral€estoppel€issue€in€its€memorandum€opinion€dismissing€the€petition€for€post„¼conviction€relief.€€Tenn.€Code.€Ann.€40„30„118(b)€(1991)€required€that€the€post„conviction€court€setÏforth€in€an€order€or€written€memorandum€of€the€case€òòallóó€grounds€presented€and€state€the€findings€ofÐ €  Ðfact€and€conclusions€of€law€with€regard€to€each€such€ground.€€However,€failure€to€abide€by€thisÐ H è  Ðrequirement€does€not€always€mandate€a€reversal€of€the€post„conviction€courtððs€judgment.€€òòRickman€v.Ð `  ÐStateóó,€972€S.W.2d€687,€692€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).€€We€conclude€that€the€record€of€the€post„Ð ( È Ðconviction€proceedings€is€sufficient€to€effectuate€meaningful€appellate€review.€€òòId.óó€€, øð AZ"Arial Regular Ý ƒ WÿÝÔ€X