ÿWPC— …# VU:a %› 0(¡w@É4  , 0”4 0DÈ 0J 0TV 0^ª 0h 0rp 0|â 0†^ 0ä 1ut 0dé U*MB)wDC  AMã B0ÖM #v~.vÓ¬ D3 0@² AOòÆA 0D D/K Bz˜HP LaserJet 4HPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLhÎ,c½¬AZ‹"Arial RegularX($¡¡ ÌÍÎÏDÐÑDÒ×eØÓ€äÚƒç"3|xæ(D(2´¤$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d!!!!7Border 1dd€-"Cþÿ << Gÿÿ d ÌÝ ƒ!ÝÔ€ ÔÝ  ÝÔ€ ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€ XÔÌÌò òAugust€21,€1997ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $ÝÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓ  Óà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€record€contains€discussions€about€the€prior€convictions€between€the€trialÏjudge€and€the€attorneys.€€However,€the€record€does€not€contain€copies€of€the€judgmentÏforms€or€a€presentence€report€indicating€prior€convictions.€€In€this€appeal,€however,€theÏdefendant€does€not€challenge€the€judgeððs€reliance€on€the€prior€convictions.ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò$$$$'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ ÔÝ  Ý›Ò  ÒÒ ° ÒÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÓ  ÓÑ\R AØ'\ÑÞ ÞÌIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEE̜ـ€ÙßR€#%"A1-j|` Å `€€@ÿRß›ÌAT€KNOXVILLEÌÌMAY€1997€SESSIONÌÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à àNo.€03„C„01„9607„CR„00251Ìà àAPPELLEE,à àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à àKnox€CountyÌv.à àà àà àà àà à)à àà àÌà àà àà àà àà à)à àRay€L.€Jenkins,€JudgeÌJEFFREY€EUGENE€DUNLAP,à à)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à à(Burglary)Ìà àAPPELLANT.à àà à)ÌÌÌÌÌÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à àà àà àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:ÌÌWilliam€C.€Talmanà àà àà àà àJohn€Knox€WalkupÌP.€O.€Box€506à àà àà àà àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÌKnoxville,€TN€€37901„0506à àà à500€Charlotte€AvenueÌ(On€Appeal€and€At€Trial)à àà àà àNashville,€TN€€37243„0497ÌÌLeslie€M.€Jeffressà àà àà àà àClinton€J.€MorganÌ1776€Riverview€Towerà àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌ900€South€Gay€Streetà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌKnoxville,€TN€€37902à àà àà àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493Ì(At€Trial)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àRandall€E.€NicholsÌà àà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àP.€O.€Box€1468Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àKnoxville,€TN€€37901„1468ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àRobert€L.€Jolley,€Jr.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àP.€O.€Box€1468Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àKnoxville,€TN€€37901„1468ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àSally€Jo€HelmÌà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àP.€O.€Box€1468Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àKnoxville,€TN€€37901„1468ÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€_________________________________ÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌÌJoe€B.€Jones,€Presiding€JudgeÇØØÙ  ÙÓÓò òÓ  ÓÔ€  ÔÑ7€ºéXXdæXXdæ7ÑO€P€I€N€I€O€NÌÔ€ XÔÌÓ  Óó óà àThe€appellant,€Jeffrey€Eugene€Dunlap€(defendant),€was€convicted€of€burglary,€aÏclass€D€felony,€by€a€jury€of€his€peers.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€toÏconfinement€for€twelve€(12)€years€in€the€Department€of€Correction€as€a€career€offender.€ÏIn€this€appeal,€the€defendant€claims€the€evidence€was€insufficient€to€support€hisÏconviction€and€the€sentence€imposed€was€excessive.€€As€both€contentions€are€withoutÏmerit,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ìà àOn€the€evening€of€May€16,€1993,€Patrolman€Kenneth€Robertson€responded€to€aÏcall€instructing€him€to€go€to€the€Mugford€Pharmacy€at€4013€Martin€Mill€in€Knoxville.€ÏWhen€Officer€Robertson€arrived€at€the€pharmacy,€he€saw€two€black€males€standingÏinside€the€pharmacy.€€A€bay€window€had€been€broken.€€The€men€were€holding€boxes.€ÏAs€soon€as€the€officer€arrived€at€the€pharmacy,€the€men€exited€the€building€and€fled€onÏfoot.€€Ìà àThe€officer€pursued€the€two€men.€€He€apprehended€the€defendant€behind€theÏbuilding.€€The€other€suspect€was€not€apprehended.€The€officer€testified€he€followed€theÏdefendant€from€the€time€he€fled€the€store€until€he€was€apprehended.€€He€never€lostÏsight€of€the€defendant.€€Ìà àApproximately€$1,000€worth€of€merchandise€had€been€placed€in€boxes.€€SomeÏof€the€merchandise€contained€in€the€boxes€was€inside€the€store.€€Other€merchandiseÏhad€been€moved€outside.€€The€manager€testified€approximately€$900€worth€of€pillsÏwere€found€outside€the€building€and€had€to€be€destroyed.€€The€manager€furtherÏtestified€he€did€not€authorize€anyone€to€break€out€the€bay€window€or€take€or€move€anyÍof€the€merchandise€in€question.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓI.ó óÌÓ  Óà àThe€appellant€contends€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€support€his€conviction.€ÏHe€argues€the€state€did€not€prove€he€had€actually€stolen€merchandise€or€intended€toÏsteal€any€merchandise€from€the€pharmacy.Ìà àWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€convicting€evidence,€thisÏCourt€must€review€the€record€to€determine€if€the€evidence€adduced€at€trial€is€sufficientÏð ðto€support€the€finding€by€the€trier€of€fact€of€guilt€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.ðð€€Tenn.€R.ÏApp.€P.€13(e).€€This€rule€is€applicable€to€findings€based€upon€direct€evidence,Ïcircumstantial€evidence,€or€a€combination€of€direct€and€circumstantial€evidence.€€òòStateÏv.€Dykesóó,€803€S.W.2d€250,€253€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1990).€€Ìà àIn€determining€the€sufficiency€of€the€convicting€evidence,€this€Court€does€notÏreweigh€or€reevaluate€the€evidence.€€òòState€v.€Matthewsóó,€805€S.W.2d€776,€779€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1990).€€Nor€may€this€Court€substitute€itsÏinferences€for€those€drawn€by€the€trier€of€fact€from€circumstantial€evidence.€€òòLiakas€v.ÏStateóó,€199€Tenn.€298,€305,€286€S.W.2d€856,€859,€òòcertóó.€òòdeniedóó,€352€U.S.€845,€77€S.Ct.Ï39,€1€L.Ed.2d€49€(1956).€€To€the€contrary,€this€Court€is€required€to€afford€the€State€ofÏTennessee€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€contained€in€the€record€asÏwell€as€all€reasonable€and€legitimate€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€from€theÏevidence.€€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.€1978).Ìà àQuestions€concerning€the€credibility€of€witnesses,€the€weight€and€value€to€beÏgiven€the€evidence,€as€well€as€all€factual€issues€raised€by€the€evidence€are€resolvedÍby€the€trier€of€fact,€not€this€Court.€€òòCabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€at€835.€€In€òòState€v.€Graceóó,€493ÏS.W.2d€474,€476€(Tenn.€1973),€our€Supreme€Court€said:€ð ðA€guilty€verdict€by€the€jury,Ïapproved€by€the€trial€judge,€accredits€the€testimony€of€the€witnesses€for€the€State€andÏresolves€all€conflicts€in€favor€of€the€theory€of€the€State.ðð€Ìà àSince€a€verdict€of€guilt€removes€the€presumption€of€innocence€and€replaces€itÏwith€a€presumption€of€guilt,€the€accused,€as€the€appellant,€has€the€burden€in€this€CourtÏof€illustrating€why€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€support€the€verdict€returned€by€the€trierÏof€fact.€€òòState€v.€Tuggleóó,€639€S.W.2d€913,€914€(Tenn.€1982).€€This€Court€will€not€disturbÏa€verdict€of€guilt€due€to€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€unless€the€facts€contained€in€theÏrecord€are€insufficient,€as€a€matter€of€law,€for€a€rational€trier€of€fact€to€find€that€theÏaccused€is€guilty€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòTuggleóó,€639€S.W.2d€at€914.Ìà àIn€this€case,€the€state€was€required€to€prove€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€(a)€theÏdefendant€entered€a€building€other€than€a€habitation,€which€was€not€open€to€the€public,€Ï(b)€with€the€intent€to€commit€larceny.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€€ðð€39„14„402.€€The€defendantÏwas€seen€inside€a€building€which€was€not€open€to€the€public.€€The€manager€of€theÏbuilding€testified€he€had€given€no€one€permission€to€enter.€€The€defendantððs€intent€toÏcommit€larceny€may€be€inferred€from€the€surrounding€circumstances.€€òòSeeóó€òòDuchac€v.ÏStateóó,€505€S.W.2d€237,€240€(Tenn.€1973),€òòcertóó.€òòdeniedóó,€419€U.S.€877,€95€S.Ct.€141,€42ÏL.Ed.2d€117€(1974).€€€Packaging€items€which€the€defendant€neither€owned,€nor€hadÏpermission€to€take€from€the€pharmacy,€in€the€middle€of€the€night,€in€front€of€a€brokenÏwindow€constitute€circumstances€from€which€an€intent€to€commit€larceny€may€be€fairlyÏdrawn.€€Some€of€the€merchandise€had€been€placed€outside€the€building.€€Additionally,Ïthe€defendantððs€flight€is€evidence€from€which€a€conclusion€of€guilt€may€be€drawn.€ÍòòState€v.€Zagorskióó,€701€S.W.2d€808,€813€(Tenn.€1985),€òòcertóó.€òòdeniedóó€478€U.S.€1010,€106ÏS.Ct.€3309,€92€L.Ed.2d€722€(1986).Ìà àThis€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓII.ó óÌÓ  Óà àThe€defendant€contends€the€sentence€is€excessive.€€The€court€found€theÏdefendant€had€at€least€eleven€prior€felony€conviction.€€Since€the€offense€was€a€Class€DÏfelony,€the€defendant€was€properly€sentenced€as€a€career€offender€to€the€maximumÏRange€III€sentence,€twelve€years.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð40„35„108(a)(3)€and€„108(c).× ƒ& ××  ×€€No€presentence€report€appears€in€the€record.€€The€lack€of€a€report€impairs€thisÏCourtððs€ability€to€conduct€a€full€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€of€the€sentence€imposed.ÌÌÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà à_____________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à€€€€€€€JOE€B.€JONES,€PRESIDING€JUDGEÌÇCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ__________________________________Ì€€€€€€€€€JOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌ__________________________________Ì€€€€€€€€€€€CURWOOD€WITT,€JUDGE