ÿWPC& ­nwÝÝÜÁ1˜’÷>L­ßáwfx8BzTòÒúÁÐ|ÚYUxÅ’nNaá#ŒžW2 ÿ¶!¢â ‚Eáïû&Úg¯YýÕ¾i›HL¼YÿlXN¢"Ÿ8À6sÌÝÿóÎqâ‡h²™$*½q(¨Ü^n7W‹Ûø´ßQ@\£güÕº†€ÆV¿Áu½zÝR>–XèCô°À„ 4¸oè:žüáO‹c4$)Uÿd)ÔªÁ ±´…S¦Ekùô#7¶J>££ÂàRð9-¯¦ „f#ç¶‹ ꬬK+¢XQŒCV ®—1Ê‚YÓ;H®Ì#|TØ/½$Ú8'ùÞŒOYLž4ž[tbâªÂo!( yf¨x´ƒµ8ËLð!Ì œ¢éÊÝ"~?'s²&E»Ýíhßî‰çÐð®o—¤ ¾ qà’§Ü© ªh̉»­tf 8‰ûʃ(»ÃMaj¼ü”©› WDà‰I÷’ØN‘Ÿ|œJ" ¡v×aõèE/– R¦UÜ.[›ŸAƬ–Ú‡®¬U?GÈl³Š¯ ˜ÃÕ=¾ŒKvÙ=+/LGâ£Å£î„ó|MñBò­fŸý §œ$`#!@UNa %¯ 0Gµüw 4  U:+ U:e úŸ N™ 0Ò› 0Dm ± U:³ mí ^ N AQVkkkkkkkkkkkkkk BÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÆÞ 0¤Æ# 0cé 0cL 0D¯¯ D3ó˜HP LaserJet 8000 DN PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX(D$¡¡Ô€ X¬ŠXXXÔtpO'½¬3|x,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular,†r‰AZ‹"Arial Regular ðÝ ƒ 5+$ÝÔ€ X†HXXXÔÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€ &»µ%X X†HÔÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€State€also€argues€the€trial€court€properly€applied€enhancement€factor€(6),€ð ðTheÐ ° Ðpersonal€injuries€inflicted€upon€or€the€amount€of€damage€to€property€sustained€by€or€taken€from€theÐ „Ô Ðvictim€was€particularly€great.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114€(6)€(1997).€€While€this€factor€was€notÐ X¨ Ðdiscussed€by€number€by€the€trial€court,€making€it€unclear€whether€it€was€applied,€based€upon€ourÐ ,| Ðòòde€novoóó€review,€we€have€applied€this€enhancement€factor.Ð P ÐÌà ` à€(‚(2%Â$¤¤Ý ƒD!ÝÔ€ Xá»XXXÔÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€ &¥%X Xá»ÔÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó„†r‰AZ‹"Arial RegularÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ¦¤›'L  Z[\]_Cþÿ<<Cÿÿ LÝ ƒ[ÑË"ÝÔ€ Xá»XXXÔÝ  ÝÔ€ èJçX Xá»ÔÓ  ÓÔ_Ôò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€ r€ç èJÔÐ  ÐÌDecember€27,€1999ÌÌCecil€Ô_ÔCrowsonÔ_Ô,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€Ô_ÔClerkÔdAxÔó óÔ_Ô dI, II,Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5N1*â.I, II,Uppercase RomanÚƒXÚÚ  Ú.Û€XÛà0 àƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(;3ÑË$¢¢Ý ƒD!ÝÔ€ Xá»XXXÔÝ  Ý(;3ÑË$££Ý ƒD!ÝÔ€ Xá»XXXÔÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó$$$$'ÿÿdxdÝ ƒD!ÝÔ€ Xá»XXXÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÓ  ÓÔ_Ôßv€_@0,j: `€€@ÿEð±Žtt¨¦(° WvßÔ_ÔÔ_ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÐ ° ÐÌAT€KNOXVILLEÌÌAUGUST€1999€SESSIONÌÌÌÌÌÓºÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à h àà À à)Ð Æ   Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àC.C.A.€No.€03C01„9809„CC„00332Ð ¬ ü  Ðà ` àAppellee,à  àà h àà À à)Ð ’â  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àCocke€CountyÐ xÈ  Ðv.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)Ð ^®  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àHonorable€Ben€W.€Hooper,€II,€JudgeÐ D”  ÐLONNIE€STEPHEN€DUNN,à À à)Ð *z  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  à(Sentencing)Ð ` Ðà ` àAppellant.à  àà h àà À à)Ð öF ÐÌÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à h àà À àà  àòòFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:Ð tÄ ÐÌTHOMAS€V.€TESTERMANà À àà  àPAUL€G.€SUMMERSÐ @ Ð301€East€Broadwayà  àà h àà À àà  àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÐ &v ÐNewport,€TN€€37821Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àGEORGIA€BLYTHE€FELNERÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAL€C.€SCHMUTZER,€JR.Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à125€Court€Avenue,€Room€301„EÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àSevierville,€TN€€37862ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àWILLIAM€(BROWNLOW)€MARSH,€IIÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à339„A€East€Main€StreetÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àNewport,€TN€€37821ÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€______________________________ÌÌÌAFFIRMED€AS€MODIFIEDÌÌÌALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGEÌÌÐ  45„06 Ðò òÔ‡ ¼ðù»X X†HÔòòÓ  ÓÑ8€‹rXdðdÈ8ÑO€P€I€N€I€O€Nó óóóÔ#† X†HX» ¼ðùà #ÔÐ ° ÐÓå ÓÌÓÓÌÓ  Óà ` àThe€Cocke€County€grand€jury€indicted€the€defendant,€Lonnie€Stephen€Dunn,€onÐ vÆ Ðthree€counts€of€statutory€rape€pursuant€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„506€(1997).€€OnÐ B ’ ÐSeptember€12,€1997,€the€defendant€pleaded€guilty€to€all€three€counts.€€After€a€sentencingÐ  ^ Ðhearing,€the€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€to€two€years€on€each€of€the€three€countsÐ Ú *  Ðwith€the€sentences€on€counts€one€and€two€to€be€served€concurrently€and€that€on€countÐ ¦ö  Ðthree€to€be€served€consecutively.€€The€trial€court€ordered€the€defendant€to€serve€one€yearÐ r  Ðin€the€county€jail,€followed€by€three€years€of€probation.€€The€defendant€timely€appealed,Ð >Ž Ðarguing€the€trial€courtððs€sentence€was€excessive.€€Based€on€our€review€of€this€matter,€weÐ  Z Ðaffirm€the€sentence€of€two€years€in€each€count,€but€modify€the€judgment€of€the€trial€courtÐ Ö& Ðto€reflect€that€all€sentences€will€be€served€concurrently.€€Additionally,€we€modify€the€termÐ ¢ò Ðof€split€confinement€to€six€months.Ð n¾ ÐÌò òÓ  ÓFACTSó óÐ V ÐÓ)Óà ` àThe€victim€in€this€case€was€a€14„year„old€girl€with€whom€the€48„year„old€defendantÐ Þ. Ðestablished€a€relationship€in€December€1993.€€The€defendant€was€a€disc€jockey€at€a€radioÐ ª!ú  Ðstation€where€the€victim€called€to€make€song€requests.€€The€defendant€and€the€victim€metÐ v#Æ" Ðand€became€friends.€€In€October€1994,€the€defendant€and€the€victim€had€sexual€intercourseÐ B%’ $ Ðfollowed€by€two€additional€instances€of€sexual€intercourse.€€The€victim€became€pregnantÐ '^"& Ðwith€the€defendantððs€child€in€May€1995.€€The€child€was€born€February€17,€1996.Ð Ú(*$( ÐÌò òÓ  ÓI.€€LENGTH€AND€CONDITIONS€OF€SENTENCEó óÐ r,Â', ÐÓóÓà ` àWhen€an€appeal€challenges€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,Ð J.š). Ðthis€court€conducts€a€òòde€novoóó€review€with€a€presumption€that€the€determination€of€the€trialÐ 0f+0 Ðcourt€is€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-401(d)€(1997).€€This€presumption€is€"conditionedÐ æ16-2 Ðupon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencingÐ ²3/4 Ðprinciples€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169Ð ~5Î06 Ð(Tenn.€1991).€€€In€the€event€that€the€record€fails€to€demonstrate€such€consideration,€reviewÐ J7š28 Ðof€the€sentence€is€purely€òòde€novoóó.€€òòIdóó.€€In€conducting€a€òòde€novoóó€review€of€a€sentence,€theÐ 9f4: Ðcourt€must€consider:€€(a)€the€evidence,€if€any,€received€at€the€trial€and€the€sentencingÐ ° Ðhearing;€(b)€the€presentence€report;€(c)€the€principles€of€sentencing€and€arguments€as€toÐ |Ì Ðsentencing€alternatives;€(d)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€the€criminal€conduct€involved;Ð H˜ Ð(e)€any€statutory€mitigating€or€enhancement€factors;€(f)€any€statement€that€the€defendantÐ  d Ðmade€on€his€own€behalf;€and€(g)€the€potential€or€lack€of€potential€for€rehabilitation€orÐ à 0 Ðtreatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40-35-102,€-103,€&€-210.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€735€S.W.2dÐ ¬ ü  Ð859,€863€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).€€If€appellate€review€reflects€that€the€trial€court€properlyÐ xÈ  Ðconsidered€all€relevant€factors€and€its€findings€of€fact€are€adequately€supported€by€theÐ D”  Ðrecord,€this€Court€must€affirm€the€sentence,€"even€if€we€would€have€preferred€a€differentÐ ` Ðresult."€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).Ð Ü, ÐÌà ` àIn€the€case€òòsub€judiceóó,€the€trial€court€found€the€existence€of€at€least€fiveÔ‡ X†HXX X†HÔ׃ ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô#† X†HXX X†H4#ÔÐ tÄ Ðenhancement€factors€listed€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114€(1997):Ð D” ÐÓ*X„X™ z À•X°œX*ÓÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(3)à8z ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àThe€offense€involved€more€than€one€(1)€victim;Ð`z z  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(4)à8z ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àA€victim€of€the€offense€was€particularly€vulnerableÐ Ü, Ðbecause€of€age€or€physical€or€mental€disability,Ð Â Ðincluding,€but€not€limited€to,€a€situation€where€theÐ ¨ø Ðdefendant€delivered€or€sold€a€controlled€substanceÐ Ž Þ Ðto€a€minor€within€one€thousand€feet€(1,000€ft.)€of€aÐ t!Ä  Ðpublic€playground,€public€swimming€pool,€youthÐ Z"ª! Ðcenter,€video€arcade,€low€income€housing€project,€orÐ @#" Ðchurch;Ð&$v#z z  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(7)à8z ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àThe€offense€involved€a€victim€and€was€committed€toÐ ò%B!% Ðgratify€the€defendant's€desire€for€pleasure€orÐ Ø&("& Ðexcitement;о'#'z z  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(15)à8z ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àThe€defendant€abused€a€position€of€public€or€privateÐ Š)Ú$) Ðtrust,€or€used€a€special€skill€in€a€manner€thatÐ p*À%* Ðsignificantly€facilitated€the€commission€or€theÐ V+¦&+ Ðfulfillment€of€the€offense;€andÐ<,Œ',z z  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(17)à8z ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àThe€defendant€committed€the€offense€while€onÐ .X). Ðschool€property.Ðî.>*/z z  ÐÌÌÌÓaÓà ` àThe€State€concedes€the€trial€court€improperly€applied€factors€(3)€and€(7),€but€arguesÐ †2Ö-3 Ðthe€trial€court€did€not€consider€factors€(4)€and€(17).€€Finally,€the€State€argues€the€trial€courtÐ ° Ðcorrectly€applied€factor€(15).€€Although€the€trial€court€discussed€the€application€of€all€fiveÐ |Ì Ðfactors,€the€record€does€not€reflect€upon€which€factors€the€trial€court€ultimately€based€itsÐ H˜ Ðdecision.€€For€this€reason,€we€will€review€the€application€of€each€factor€òòde€novoóó.€Ð  d ÐÌà ` àThe€defendant€argues,€and€the€State€concedes,€that€enhancement€factor€(3)€cannotÐ °  Ðbe€applied.€€The€trial€court€stated€that€the€child€produced€by€the€victim€and€the€defendantÐ |Ì  Ðcould€probably€be€considered€a€victim€for€purposes€of€enhancement.€€The€TennesseeÐ H˜  ÐSupreme€Court€has€held€the€term€ð ðvictimðð€as€used€in€the€statue€ð ðis€limited€in€scope€to€aÐ d Ðperson€or€entity€that€is€injured,€killed,€had€property€stolen,€or€had€property€destroyed€by€theÐ à0 Ðperpetrator€of€the€crime.€€Moreover,€giving€the€term€a€generic€meaning€would€deprecateÐ ¬ü Ðthis€factor€and€render€it€meaningless.ðð€€òòState€v.€Rainesóó,€882€S.W.2d€376,€384€(Tenn.Ð xÈ Ð1994).€€Although€the€child€may€suffer€because€of€the€circumstances€of€its€birth,€the€childÐ D” Ðmay€not€be€considered€a€victim€of€the€defendantððs€crime€for€enhancement€purposes.€€Ð ` ÐÌà ` àEnhancement€factor€(4)€was€discussed€but€not€applied€by€the€trial€court.€€Again,€theÐ ¨ø Ðdefense€argues,€and€the€State€concedes,€that€this€factor€would€not€have€applied.€€FactorÐ t!Ä  Ð(4)€can€be€applied€in€a€statutory€rape€case€if€the€State€shows€the€victim€was€suffering€fromÐ @#" Ðsomething€other€than€age€alone€that€caused€her€to€be€ð ðparticularly€vulnerableðð€to€the€crime.€Ð  %\ $ ЀòòState€v.€Adamsóó,€864€S.W.2d€31,€35€(Tenn.€1993).€€Enhancement€under€this€factor€ð ðrelatesÐ Ø&("& Ðmore€to€the€natural€physical€and€mental€limitations€of€the€victim€than€merely€the€victimððsÐ ¤(ô#( Ðage.ðð€€òòAdamsóó,€864€S.W.2d€at€35.€€ð ðParticularly€vulnerable"€in€this€context€means€incapableÐ p*À%* Ðof€resisting,€summoning€help,€or€testifying€against€the€perpetrator.€€òòId.óó€€The€State€bears€theÐ <,Œ', Ðburden€of€proving€the€victim's€limitations€rendering€him€or€her€particularly€vulnerable.€€€€AsÐ .X). Ðthe€State€concedes,€nothing€in€the€record€indicates€the€victim€was€particularly€vulnerableÐ Ô/$+0 Ðin€comparison€to€others€her€age.Ð  1ð,2 ÐÌà ` àBased€upon€our€review,€we€conclude€that€enhancement€factor€(7)€was€properlyÐ 85ˆ06 Ðapplied€by€the€trial€court.€€The€circumstances€of€the€crime,€including€the€age€differenceÐ 7T28 Ðbetween€the€defendant€and€the€victim,€his€continued€contacts€with€her,€andÐ Ð8 4: Ðcorrespondence€to€her,€support€the€application€of€this€factor.€€However,€it€is€not€entitled€toÐ ° Ðgreat€weight.Ð |Ì ÐÌà ` àEnhancement€factor€(15)€was€improperly€applied.€€Application€of€this€factor€requiresÐ  d Ða€finding,€first,€that€the€defendant€occupied€a€position€of€trust,€either€public€or€private.€€TheÐ à 0 Ðpositions€of€ð ðparent,€stepparent,€babysitter,€teacher,€coach€are€but€a€few€obviousÐ ¬ ü  Ðexamples.ðð€€òòKissingeróó,€922€S.W.2d€at€488.€€In€this€case,€the€trial€courtòòóó€found€the€defendantÐ xÈ  Ðoccupied€a€position€of€public€trust€as€a€radio€disc€jockey.€€The€existence€of€a€position€ofÐ D”  Ðtrust€does€not€depend€on€the€length€or€formality€of€the€relationship,€but€instead€dependsÐ ` Ðupon€the€nature€of€the€relationship.€€òòIdóó.€€ð ðThus,€the€court€should€look€to€see€whether€theÐ Ü, Ðoffender€formally€or€informally€stood€in€a€relationship€to€the€victim€that€promotedÐ ¨ø Ðconfidence,€reliability,€or€faith.€€If€the€evidence€supports€that€finding,€then€the€court€mustÐ tÄ Ðdetermine€whether€the€position€occupied€was€abused€by€the€commission€of€the€offense.ðð€Ð @ ÐòòIdóó.€€Although€the€defendant€and€the€victim€met€through€the€defendantððs€job€as€a€discÐ  \ Ðjockey,€the€record€does€not€indicate€that€the€defendant€used€his€position€to€commit€theÐ Ø( Ðoffenses€in€question€or€whether€the€position,€in€fact,€could€be€utilized€in€that€fashion.€Ð ¤ô ÐAbsent€such€a€finding,€enhancement€factor€(15)€cannot€be€applied.Ð p!À  ÐÌà ` àAlthough€the€trial€court€stated€that€it€could€ð ðprobably€be€saidðð€that€enhancementÐ %X $ Ðfactor€(17)€applied,€the€court€said€that€it€was€not€going€to€ð ðrely€particularlyðð€upon€this€factor.€Ð Ô&$"& ÐThe€State€concedes€that€it€would€have€been€erroneous€for€the€trial€court€to€apply€thisÐ  (ð#( Ðfactor.€€The€victim€testified€she€and€the€defendant€first€engaged€in€sexual€intercourse€at€theÐ l*¼%* Ðdefendantððs€home.€€The€record€does€not€indicate€where€the€other€two€instances€occurred.€Ð 8,ˆ', ÐNothing€in€the€record€indicates€any€of€the€three€offenses€occurred€on€school€property.€Ð .T). ÐTherefore,€this€factor€was€not€applicable.Ð Ð/ +0 ÐÌà ` àHaving€reviewed€the€record€òòde€novoóó,€we€hold€that€none€of€the€five€enhancementÐ h3¸.4 Ðfactors€discussed€by€the€trial€court€were€applicable.€€However,€using€our€power€of€òòde€novoóóÐ 85ˆ06 Ðreview,€we€hold€that€the€record€does€support€the€application€of€enhancement€factor€(6):Ð 7X28 Ðð ðThe€personal€injuries€inflicted€upon€or€the€amount€of€damage€to€property€sustained€by€orÐ Ô8$4: Ðtaken€from€the€victim€was€particularly€great.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114€(6)€(1997).€€ItÐ ° Ðis€undisputed€that€the€victim€became€pregnant€and€gave€birth€to€a€child€as€a€result€of€theÐ |Ì Ðsexual€relations€between€herself€and€the€defendant.€€This€court€has€held€"an€unwantedÐ H˜ Ðpregnancy€.€.€.€does€.€.€.€come€within€the€definition€of€personal€injury."€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€910Ð  d ÐS.W.2d€457,€461€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995)€(quoting€òòState€v.€Jonesóó,€889€S.W.2d€225,€231Ð à 0 Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòpermóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1994)).€€The€victim€testified€she€and€theÐ ¬ ü  Ðdefendant€discussed€having€children€when€she€reached€18€years€of€age,€but€the€pregnancyÐ xÈ  Ðthat€resulted€in€the€birth€of€their€child€was€unwanted.€€Therefore,€we€hold€that€factor€(6)€isÐ D”  Ðappropriate€for€enhancement€purposes.Ð ` ÐÌà ` àHowever,€in€our€òòde€novo€óóreview€of€the€sentences,€we€hold€that€the€that€the€trial€courtÐ ¨ø Ðerred€in€ordering€that€two€of€the€sentences€be€served€consecutively.€€None€of€the€requiredÐ xÈ Ðcriteria€are€present€for€the€sentences€to€be€served€consecutively.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„Ð D” Ð35„115€(1997).€€Thus,€we€modify€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€to€reflect€that€the€sentencesÐ ` Ðbe€served€concurrently.€€Additionally,€we€hold€that€although€the€lengths€of€the€defendantððsÐ Ü, Ðsentences€were€proper,€the€defendant€cannot€be€made€to€serve€one€year€of€actualÐ ¨ø Ðconfinement,€followed€by€three€years€of€probation,€as€ordered€by€the€trial€court.€€AlthoughÐ t!Ä  Ða€defendant€receiving€split€confinement€ordinarily€may€be€made€to€serve€up€to€one€year€inÐ @#" Ðthe€local€jail,€followed€by€probation,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„306(a),€inmates€such€as€thisÐ  %\ $ Ðdefendant,€with€felony€sentences€of€two€years€or€less€ð ðshall€have€the€remainder€of€theirÐ Ø&("& Ðoriginal€sentence€suspended€upon€reaching€their€release€eligibility€date,ðð€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð ¤(ô#( Ððð€40„35„501(a)(3),€unless€the€district€attorney€general€files€a€petition€requesting€denial€ofÐ p*À%* Ðthe€suspension€of€the€sentence€based€upon,€òòinter€aliaóó,€disciplinary€infraction€occurringÐ <,Œ', Ðwhile€the€defendant€was€incarcerated.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„501(a)(6).€€ApplyingÐ  .\). Ðthese€statutes,€this€court€has€ruled€that€the€period€which€a€defendant€is€ordered€to€serveÐ Ø/(+0 Ðin€split€confinement€cannot€exceed€what€would€otherwise€be€the€release€eligibility€date.€Ð ¤1ô,2 ÐòòState€v.€Glynnon€Bradshawóó,€No.€01C01„9810„CR„00439,€Wilson€County,€1999€WLÐ p3À.4 Ð737871,€at€*2€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€Sept.€22,€1999).€€Since€the€release€eligibilityÐ <5Œ06 Ðdate€for€a€Range€I€standard€offender€is€7.2€months,€minus€sentence€credits,€this€defendant€Ð 7X28 ÐÐ Ô8$4: Ðcannot€be€ordered€to€serve€one€year€of€a€two„year€sentence,€because€such€a€sentenceÐ ° Ðwould€exceed€his€release€eligibility€date.€€Thus,€as€did€the€court€in€òòBradshawóó,€we€set€theÐ |Ì Ðlength€of€split€confinement€at€six€months.€€€€€€€Ð H˜ ÐÌà ` àThe€defendant€has€also€assigned,€as€error,€the€fact€that€the€trial€court€did€not€utilizeÐ à 0 Ðalternative€sentencing€in€this€matter.€However,€since€the€defendant€was€convicted€ofÐ ¬ ü  Ðstatutory€rape,€a€crime€against€the€person,€he€was€not€eligible€for€placement€in€aÐ xÈ  Ðcommunity€corrections€program.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„36„106(a)(2),€39„13„506.Ð D”  ÐÌà ` àThe€defendant€has€argued,€as€well,€that€he€should€have€been€granted€probation€forÐ Ü, Ðhis€entire€sentence,€rather€than€having€split€confinement€imposed.€€€The€burden€was€on€theÐ ¨ø Ðdefendant€to€establish€that€he€was€a€suitable€candidate€for€probation.€Tenn.€Code.€Ann.Ð tÄ Ððð€40„35„303(b).€€To€meet€this€burden,€he€must€show€that€probation€will€ð ðsubserve€the€endsÐ @ Ðof€justice€and€the€best€interest€of€both€the€public€and€the€defendant.ðð€€òòState€v.€Binghamóó,Ð  \ Ð910€S.W.2d€448,€456€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòpermóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1995)€(quoting€òòStateÐ Ø( Ðv.€Dykesóó,€803€S.W.2d€250,€259€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1990)).€€According€to€òòBinghamóó,€theÐ ¤ô Ðsentencing€court€should€utilize€the€following€considerations€in€assessing€a€defendantððsÐ p!À  Ðsuitability€for€probation:Ð <#Œ" ÐÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(1)€à8z ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àð ðthe€nature€and€[circumstances]€of€the€criminalÐ %X $ Ðconduct€involved,ðð€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð î%>!% Ð210(b)(4)€(1990€Repl.);ÐÔ&$"&z z  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(2)€à8z ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àthe€defendantððs€potential€or€lack€of€potential€forÐ  (ð#( Ðrehabilitation,€including€the€risk€that€during€theÐ †)Ö$) Ðperiod€of€probation€the€defendant€will€commitÐ l*¼%* Ðanother€crime,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(5)Ð R+¢&+ Ð(1990€Repl.);Ð8,ˆ',z z  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(3)€à8z ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àwhether€a€sentence€of€full€probation€would€undulyÐ .T). Ðdepreciate€the€seriousness€of€the€offense,€Tenn.Ð ê.:*/ ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(B)€(1990€Repl.);€andÐÐ/ +0z z  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(4)€à8z ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àwhether€a€sentence€other€than€full€probation€wouldÐ œ1ì,2 Ðprovide€an€effective€deterrent€to€others€likely€toÐ ‚2Ò-3 Ðcommit€similar€crimes,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð h3¸.4 Ð103(1)(B)€(1990€Repl.).ÐN4ž/5z z  ÐÌòòóó910€S.W.2d€at€456.Ð 6j17 ÐÌÌÌÓÓÐ ²95; Ðà ` àThe€trial€court€may€deny€probation€when€the€circumstances€of€the€offense€are€ð ðofÐ ° Ðsuch€a€nature€to€outweigh€all€other€factors€which€might€favor€probation.ðð€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,Ð |Ì Ð805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€In€the€case€of€this€defendant,€in€additionÐ H˜ Ðto€the€approximate€thirty„four„year€age€difference€between€the€defendant€and€the€victim,Ð  d Ðhe€persisted€in€having€contact€with€the€victim,€sending€cards€and€letters€to€her.€€TheseÐ à 0 Ðcontacts€with€the€victim€continued€even€after€the€defendant€was€charged€with€three€countsÐ ¬ ü  Ðof€statutory€rape.€€In€view€of€this,€we€conclude€that€the€defendant€has€failed€to€carry€hisÐ xÈ  Ðburden€of€showing€that€he€is€entitled€to€total€probation,€and€affirm,€as€modified,€the€trialÐ D”  Ðcourtððs€ordering€that€a€portion€of€his€sentence€be€served€in€confinement.Ð ` ÐÌà@¤¤*Dàò òCONCLUSIONó óˆÐ ¨ø Ðà ` àWe€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€sentencing€the€defendant€to€two€years€in€each€count,€butÐ €Ð Ðmodify€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€to€reflect€that€the€sentences€be€served€concurrently€Ð Lœ Ðand€that€the€period€of€actual€confinement€be€six€months.€€This€matter€is€remanded€to€theÐ h Ðtrial€court€for€entry€of€a€judgment€in€accord€with€this€opinion.Ð ä4 ÐÌÌÓÓÔ‡X†HXX X†HÔà ` àà ¸ àà ™ àà z àà À àà  à________________________________________Ð H#˜" Ðà ` àà ¸ àà ™ àà z àà À àà  àALAN€E.€€GLENN,€JUDGEÐ .$~# ÐÌCONCUR:Ð ú%J!% ÐÌÌÌÌ____________________________________Ð x*È%* ÐJOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€JUDGEÐ ^+®&+ ÐÌÌÌÌ____________________________________Ð Ü/,+0 ÐJOHN€EVERETT€WILLIAMS,€JUDGEÐ Â0,1 Ðà ` àÔ#† X†HXXX†H¦Z#Ô