ÿWPCÀ ?3K«Ç2¬úê–Ðø „$GÃÑ.³ìe¦iHûRh{Gý/¦Y}a…O”LÞi¨N0Ü Èj´àš¸´!Iè]qCöËÂâ@ÿñ1SÖÜÒs¤@åÉ»Ñö*mÓ@$Ë5€P…‡ÈsözÛ™@ƒ’¸É [“D%ø“ý›H‡Ê¡eN!ÖVI2¥áåQ‰ai«º,ô [èÇe,T[ŸAÅÇuÛ¼õ>„ÈþîFˆ‘´ÆÕP5Óˆ©Oœüo™^y÷fqÀï+މsY`Jßu¼Z0–lîkù30j¾0Þ¬nÑ^‚÷?3¾ßZ(påÛãÎ/–}ÕªÀ“Gˆ£!™“ÊÛº£÷Í+‘T¡YO’úM*-žDt^¨]›¾ðëÉ—ìS[]ŒYçˆÊ´:‡·> S›œÏ½qWZ›ùŠ€|5·ôømøl9OÇyle´Ã·¡Ÿèd´Í¸Œ`‚qo€«½øë>ƒ.©Ý~Ô!æ{—ŒÁ>¬% ú[)?(µ¹æ£L¢h’kQî}‡žØLëÍ$ŸŠ© ›ë0³¼ÏÕ^ÍÇ%§˜bìBÅÄ–_¥—›ç¨Qƒ*F4/Árzm¬ñ2c|RK)ÕºôrîVÐ\üÖ°Ÿ|Ab#Á\ % ^ # 0ˆ/ UN· w 4 z Ò— i x mz z Æ‘ ÆW Æ Æã ã N©««E³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³bµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµ 0ë½½½½ B¨¨ 0¤Å D3i D-œ 0KÉÉ ASÆg 0¤- 0DÑ A«˜HP LaserJet 4,ü,,,,,ü0»¹s¹(˜ (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularq\;'ê:i¢Ø+00 ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 - ù-(|G2ª9$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ªL»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€X¤kX»»Ô d(|3A$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ªL»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3A$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ªL»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ªL»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€¼ªL»»»ÔÑ8€¤kXXdð»»d8Ñà@HHìàIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@””$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEˆÐ È ÐÔ‡X¤kX»¼ªLÔÌò òÔ#†¼ªL»XX¤kk#ÔÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€ROBERT€LEE€DAYÔ‡X¤kX»¼ªLÔó óÐ Ð  ÐÓ±ÓÌà@„ „ ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Blount€CountyˆÐ Ø ( Ðà@= = ìàNos.€C„11464,€11465€€D.€Kelly€Thomas,€Judge€ˆÐ È  ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<— ` A߈Ð ˜ è  ÐÌà@  ìàNo.€E1999„01380„CCA„R3„CD€„€Decided€ˆÐ —ç  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h à€€€€€€€May€25,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ÔÌßA€V) °°` dE<v` AßÐ wÇ  Ðó óÌÌThe€defendant,€Robert€Lee€Day,€having€a€lengthy€history€of€driving€offenses,€is€not€entitled€toÐ f¶  Ðimmediate€probation€on€a€one„year€sentence€for€violation€of€the€Motor€Vehicle€Habitual€Offender'sÐ V¦ ÐAct.€€Ð F– ÐÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€Affirmedó óÐ &v ÐÌòòWade,€P.J.,€Ô#†¼ªL»àX¤ká#ÔÔ‡X¤kX.¼ªLÔóó€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòTipton€óó€and€òòWitt,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð V ÐÌJulie€A.€Rice,€Contract€Appellate€Defender€(on€appeal),€Knoxville,€Tennessee,€and€Stacey€Nordquist,Ð æ6 ÐAssistant€District€Public€Defender€(at€trial),€Maryville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Robert€Lee€Day.€Ð Ö& ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter,€Patricia€C.€Kussman,€Assistant€Attorney€General,Ð ¶ Ðand€John€Bobo,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.€€Ð ¦ö ÐÌà@55'ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼ªL»XX¤kí#ԈР†Ö ÐÌÔ€X¤kX»¼ªLÔà  àà ` àThe€defendant,€Robert€Lee€Day,€pled€guilty€to€criminal€impersonation€and€violationÐ Ž!Þ  Ðof€the€Motor€Vehicle€Habitual€Offender's€Act.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€€39„16„301,€55„10„616.€€TheÐ ~"Î! Ðtrial€court€imposed€a€sentence€of€one€year€for€the€habitual€motor€vehicle€offender€violation,€with€90Ð n#¾" Ðdays€in€jail€on€work€release€and€the€balance€on€supervised€probation.€€A€consecutive€three„monthÐ ^$®# Ðsentence,€to€be€served€on€probation,€was€imposed€for€the€criminal€impersonation.€€In€this€appeal€ofÐ N%ž $ Ðright,€the€defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€imposing€the€90„day€jail€sentence.€€TheÐ >&Ž!% Ðjudgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð .'~"& ÐÌà  àà ` àOn€January€3,€1999,€the€defendant€was€stopped€by€police€for€a€registration€violation.€Ð )^$( ÐBecause€the€defendant€did€not€have€a€valid€driver's€license,€he€informed€Officer€Rick€Arnold€thatÐ þ)N%) Ðhis€name€was€John€William€Day.€€The€defendant€also€provided€a€false€date€of€birth.€€Ð î*>&* ÐÌà  àà ` àAt€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€defendant,€an€unemployed€painter€and€constructionÐ Î,(, Ðworker,€explained€that€he€provided€a€false€name€because€he€"didn't€want€to€[go]€to€jail€and€lose€[his]Ð ¾-)-ý Ðjob."€€Twenty„six€years€old€at€the€time€of€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€defendant€is€single€and€residesÐ ° Ðwith€his€mother,€his€stepfather,€and€a€stepbrother.€€Although€he€dropped€out€of€school€in€the€tenthÐ  ð Ðgrade,€the€defendant€has€since€obtained€his€Graduate€Equivalent€Diploma.€€Ð à ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€defendant,€who€last€held€employment€with€a€paint€contractor€but€quit€due€to€aÐ pÀ Ðdisagreement€with€his€supervisor,€has€several€prior€offenses€which€include€theft€of€less€than€$500Ð ` ° Ðin€1999,€driving€on€a€revoked€license€in€1997,€and€possession€of€marijuana€in€1996.€€OtherÐ P   Ðconvictions€between€1991€and€1995€include€possession€of€burglary€tools,€driving€on€a€suspendedÐ @  Ðlicense,€and€three€counts€of€driving€on€a€revoked€license.€€In€1994,€he€was€convicted€of€four€separateÐ 0 € Ðtraffic€offenses:€€two€instances€of€speeding,€one€reckless€driving€offense,€and€one€offense€ofÐ  p  Ðdisregard€of€a€red€traffic€signal.€€The€defendant€reported€that€he€was€arrested€for€possession€ofÐ `  Ðmarijuana€as€a€juvenile.€€Ð P  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€defendant€reported€having€consumed€alcohol€regularly€since€the€age€of€13.€Ð à0  ÐWhile€he€denied€using€marijuana,€he€tested€positive€for€marijuana€in€a€drug€screen€conducted€priorÐ Ð  Ðto€the€sentencing€hearing.€€He€described€himself€as€in€good€mental€health€and€without€anyÐ À Ðdependence€upon€drugs€or€alcohol.€€Other€than€having€a€problem€with€his€right€knee,€the€defendantÐ ° Ðis€in€good€physical€health.€€He€recently€recovered€from€a€broken€foot.€€At€the€sentencing€hearing,€theÐ  ð Ðdefendant€explained€that€he€was€driving€his€vehicle€because€he€had€no€other€means€of€transportationÐ à Ðto€and€from€his€place€of€employment.€€The€defendant€was€on€bail€for€theft€charges€when€he€wasÐ €Ð Ðarrested€on€these€offenses.€€Ð pÀ ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€trial€court€found€two€enhancement€factors:€€that€the€defendant€had€a€previousÐ P  Ðhistory€of€criminal€convictions€in€addition€to€those€necessary€to€establish€the€proper€range€and€thatÐ @ Ðthe€defendant€had€demonstrated€an€unwillingness€to€comply€with€conditions€of€a€sentence€involvingÐ 0€ Ðrelease€into€the€community.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1),€(8).€€As€mitigating€factors,€theÐ  p Ðtrial€court€observed€that€the€defendant's€conduct€neither€threatened€nor€caused€injury€and€that€theÐ ` Ðdefendant€had€committed€the€crimes€due€to€his€desire€to€provide€for€his€family.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€CodeÐ P ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„113(1),€(7).€€The€trial€court€imposed€a€jail€sentence€due€to€the€defendant's€lack€ofÐ ð@ Ðcandor,€his€poor€rehabilitative€prospects,€and€his€prior€criminal€history.€€Ð à0 ÐÌà  àà ` àAmong€the€factors€applicable€to€probation€consideration€are€the€circumstances€of€theÐ À! Ðoffense,€the€defendant's€criminal€record,€social€history€and€present€condition,€and€the€deterrent€effectÐ °"  Ðupon€and€best€interest€of€the€defendant€and€the€public.€€òòState€v.€Grearóó,€568€S.W.2d€285€(Tenn.1978).€Ð  #ð! ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€our€view,€the€trial€court€did€not€commit€error.€€At€a€relatively€young€age,€theÐ €%Ð # Ðdefendant€has€a€number€of€prior€criminal€offenses,€most€of€which€are€traffic„related.€€He€continuedÐ p&À!$ Ðto€drive€despite€having€lost€his€driving€privileges€several€years€prior€to€these€offenses.€€He€apparentlyÐ `'°"% Ðdid€so€for€some€time€before€he€was€caught.€€His€explanation€to€the€trial€court€when€asked€why€heÐ P( #& Ðtested€positive€for€marijuana€in€a€drug€screen,€taken€just€before€his€sentencing€hearing,€€was€that€heÐ @)$' Ðhad€"walked€through€a€room€with€marijuana€smoke€in€it."€€The€trial€court€determined€that€theÐ 0*€%( Ðresponse€was€not€a€candid€explanation€of€the€circumstances.€€The€evidence€does€not€preponderateÐ  +p&) Ðagainst€that€conclusion.€€Ð ,`'* Їà  àà ` àAccordingly,€the€judgment€is€affirmed.€€Ð ° ÐÌ