WPCP ,pͼ:&g2ԣ OD&9?V%* |P6\)˜gLN?|戢-C* n)4y2Qgq5J#|?X[ @rl"?ap|exTt7y-ּ}O9GoNmj;\kxf8UDa1Łk\ 쨩&9O jb %\^ b 0nwUN4H\ zk m # UN   k 1U,@N7 1u9 72E 0cbEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 0MMMM B88 0U D3 D-, 0KYY AS 0 0Da A) (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularJ~'m3|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptUHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 60(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(9 Z(Times New Roman 3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)(;3$2#  0  .3  0  - -(|G2hV$ !.8B0dd8         0  X<X d(|3t$ !.8B0dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3t$ !.8B0dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8B0dd8     _B08<XXdd8@HHINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @$ATNASHVILLE    FEBRUARY2000SessionX<XB0   #B0XX<̌#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.X<XB0 #B0XX<#SHERMAN_DUNLAP_X<XB0  * @@  AppealasofRightfromtheCircuitCourtforCoffeeCounty   @@ No.28,329JohnW.Rollins,Judge   @@*AV) ` dE<e ` A f   @@ No.M199900325CCAR3CDFiledAugust4,_2000_Ԁ [  AV) ` dE<&` A 'w     Sherman_Dunlap_ԀappealshissentenceafterpleadingguiltyintheCoffeeCountyCircuitCourt#B0XX<~#X<XB0Ԁto l  facilitationoftheftover$10,000,aclassDfelony.Thetrialcourtsentencedtheappellant,asa R  RangeIImultipleoffender,tofouryearsincarcerationintheTennesseeDepartmentof 8 Correction,requiringtheappellanttoserveoneyearofhissentenceincontinuousconfinement.  Onappeal,theappellantpresentsthefollowingissueforreview:whetherthetrialcourterredin  denyinghimfullprobationor,inthealternative,indenyinghimanopportunitytoservehis  sentenceinperiodicconfinement.Followingareviewoftherecordandthepartiesbriefs,we  affirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. f Ѐ Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtisAffirmed.  2 NormaMcGeeOgle,#B0X!% offenderconvictedofaclassC,D,orEfelonyispresumedtobeafavorablecandidatefor &$"& alternativesentencing.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035102(6)(1997).Becausetheappellantisa ' #' RangeIIoffender,he#X<XXX<&'#X<XXX<#B0XX<'#X<XB0Ԁdidnotqualifyforthepresumptionofalternativesentencing.See#B0XX<̡)#X<XB0#X<XXX<_)#X<XXX<ԀTenn. (#( CodeAnn.4035105(a)(1)(1997).#X<XXX-##B0XX<̀-#X<XB0ԀTheappellantmustdemonstratethatprobationwill subservetheendsof  justiceandthebestinterestofboththepublicandthe[appellant]inordertomeetthisburden.  Statev.Dykes,803S.W.2d250,259(Tenn.Crim.App.1990).Indeterminingtheappellants | suitabilityforfullprobation,thetrialcourtmustconsider(1)whetherasentenceoffull b probationwouldundulydepreciatetheseriousnessoftheoffense;(2)thenatureand H circumstancesofthecriminalconductinvolved#B0XX!% S.W.2dat455#B0XX!%    `     h   NormaMcGeeOgle,Judge