ÿWPC! …# VU>a %Ÿ 0í¥UB’ 4Ô è n­÷ ¤ 0J¬ w@ö UF6 01| 0D­ 0Tñ 0^E 0h£ 0r  0|} 0†ù 0 1u 0d„ BèU6U.;U *iB)“ D3¼DCï AM2 0@l¿L+wv~‹vÓ  AOÜÆ+ 0Dñ D/5! Bd!˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 <èÀ( 9Z &Courier RegularX(ÅÕÐ$¡¡Ñ  ÑÑ7€'CXXdÈXXdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÓiU°X` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXiÓ<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpi©U!3|x—«<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXxþ6X@ÉJQX@2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô ƒU„E…P†‡DˆD‰Še‹ŒÓ€<à09Z ‹.Courier New Regular(á(3 ²$¤¤Ý ƒÕÐ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ7€®jXXdÈXXdì7ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÓiU°X` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXiÓÝ  Ýà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô  ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ d< Œ 9p`(Courier New< Œ 9p`(Courier< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d$$$$'ÿÿdxd))))7Border 1dd€-+Cþÿ << Gÿÿ("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò bÝ ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€&ÔÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÓ` °˜XÓÝ  ÝÔ€(ÔÔ€(ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€(XÔÌÌò òOctober€4,€1996ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€(ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó BÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€&ÔÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÓ` °˜XÓÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€(ÔÔ€(ôÔThe€stateððs€brief€says€that€no€hearing€was€held.Ì Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€&ÔÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÓ` °˜XÓÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€(ÔÔ€(ôÔWe€do€not€believe€that€we€can€cast€upon€the€petitioners€the€blame€of€an€inadequate€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ïrecord€in€this€case.€€With€the€trial€courtððs€order€being€entered€three€days€after€the€petitioners€had€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ïfiled€their€petition€and€with€that€order€asserting€facts€the€trial€court€found€to€exist€without€any€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ïindication€of€either€a€hearing€being€held€or€other€records€being€reviewed,€we€doubt€that€any€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ïadditional€record€exists€in€this€case.ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'@Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Geneva ÒÒ  BA Op Geneva Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€&ÔÑ  ÑÑ#€''Xd#ÑÑ#€''Xd#ÑÑ  ÑÓ` °˜XÓÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÑ  ÑÑ Ü ÑÓÓÑ\R AØ'\Ñ›Ñ7€²XXdÖXXdÈ7ÑÔ€(Ԝـ€ÙßL€,.+;+'h|` Å `€€Lß›à@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINALÏAPPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ à€€€€€€€€€AT€KNOXVILLEà@ à€€€€€€€€€Ìà@ àDECEMBER€1994€SESSIONÌÌÓÓDONALD€ESLICK€and€€à àà à)à àÌROBERT€RAPPUHN,à àà à)Ìà à€€€€€€€€€€à àà à)à àNo.€03C01„9409„CR„00351Ìà àAppellants,à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà à)à àMcMinn€CountyÌv.à àà àà àà à)€€€€€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà à)à àHon.€R.€Steven€Bebb,€Judge€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà à)ÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,€€€€€à à)à à(Denial€of€Expunction)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à àà àà àà à)€€€€€€€€Ìà àAppellee.à àà à)Ìà àà àà àÌÌÌÌòòFor€the€Appellantsóó:à àà àà àà àòòFor€the€Appelleeóó:ÌÌDonald€Eslick€and€à àà àà àà àCharles€W.€BursonÌRobert€Rappuhn,€òòProóó€òòSeóóà àà àà àAttorney€General€of€TennesseeÌR.M.S.I.,€Unit€6à àà àà àà àà àandÌ7475€Cockrill€Bend€Ind.€Blvd.à àà àMerrilyn€FeirmanÌNashville,€TN€37209„1010à àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€General€of€TennesseeÌà àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌà àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0485ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àJerry€N.€EstesÌà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà à203€E.€Madison€AvenueÌà àà àà àà àà àP.O.€Box€647Ìà àà àà àà àà àAthens,€TN€37303„0647ÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:_______________________ÌÌÌÌœREVERSED€AND€REMANDED›ÌÌJoseph€M.€TiptonÌJudgeÌÌÌÓÓà@ àòòò òÌÌÌà@ àO€P€I€N€I€O€NÌÌà àóóó óThe€petitioners,€Donald€Eslick€and€Robert€Rappuhn,€appeal€as€of€rightÏfrom€the€McMinn€County€Criminal€Courtððs€denial€of€their€petition€to€expunge€publicÏrecords€regarding€aggravated€rape€and€murder€charges€that€were€resolved€in€theirÏfavor.€€The€trial€court€concluded€that€the€record€of€those€charges€were€so€intertwinedÏwith€the€aggravated€kidnapping€convictions€received€by€the€petitioners€that€expunctionÏshould€not€occur.€€The€petitioners€contend€that€the€records€pertaining€to€the€dismissedÏor€acquitted€charge€are€to€be€expunged€pursuant€to€T.C.A.€ðð€40„32„101€even€thoughÏthey€are€convicted€upon€another€charge€arising€from€the€same€indictment.€€Also,€theyÏcontend€that€the€trial€judge€should€have€recused€himself€from€this€case€because€heÍwas€the€assistant€district€attorney€who€prosecuted€them€for€the€relevant€criminalÏcharges.€€The€state€acknowledges€that€a€remand€for€further€consideration€may€beÏappropriate,€but€it€makes€no€response€to€the€recusal€claim.€€We€agree€that€a€remand€isÏin€order€and€the€issue€of€recusal€should€be€addressed€in€the€trial€court.ÌÌà àThe€record€in€this€appeal€is€scant.€€The€petition€seeking€expunction€wasÏfiled€on€May€6,€1994,€and€the€trial€courtððs€order€denying€relief€was€filed€on€May€9,Ï1994.€€The€order€does€not€indicate€if€or€when€any€hearing€was€held,× ƒ/ ××  ×€but€it€contains€anÏaccount€of€the€petitionersðð€relevant€case€history.€€The€order€is€as€follows:ÌÓ  ÓÓÓà8 àà àThe€petitioners€Rappuhn€and€Eslick€were€jointlyÏindicted€with€two€other€defendants€in€a€four€countÏindictment,€all€offenses€growing€out€of€the€same€action€ofÏcriminal€conduct.€€The€first€two€counts€were€consolidatedÏand€charged€all€four€defendants€with€felony€murder€of€theÏvictim.€€The€third€count€charged€all€four€defendants€withÏaggravated€kidnapping€of€the€same€victim,€and€the€fourthÏcount€charged€only€the€petitioners€with€aggravated€rape€ofÏthe€same€victim,€and€the€fourth€count€was€dismissed€by€theÏstateððs€motion.€€The€cases€were€jointly€tried€by€jury€on€AprilÏthe€28th,€29th,€and€30th,€1982,€resulting€in€the€acquittal€ofÏtwo€of€the€defendants€on€all€counts,€and€an€acquittal€of€theÏpetitioners€on€the€murder€count€and€resulting€in€theÏconviction€of€the€petitioner[s]€on€the€offense€of€aggravatedÏkidnapping.ÌÌà8 àà àAlthough€technically€the€petitioners€may€be€entitledÏto€expungement€of€the€records€relative€to€the€aggravatedÏrape€charge€and€the€murder€charge,€the€Court€is€of€theÏopinion€and€finds€that€the€records€of€those€two€charges€areÍso€entwined€with€the€offense€of€aggravated€kidnapping€thatÏthe€records,€including€the€District€Attorneyððs€files,€the€policeÏdepartment€files,€court€records,€and€all€other€documentsÏconcerning€these€charges,€cannot€be€expunged€withoutÏdestroying€substantive€data€affecting€the€charge€for€whichÏthey€were€convicted,€and€thus€the€petition€for€expungementÏis€hereby€denied.ÌÌÓ  ÓÌÓÓà àOrdinarily,€the€trial€court€has€no€discretion€relative€to€expunging€publicÏrecords€for€charges€resulting€in€a€dismissal€or€an€acquittal.€€òòState€v.€McCaryóó,€815ÏS.W.2d€220,€221„22€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€Obviously,€some€records€that€relate€toÏseveral€charges,€some€resulting€in€convictions€and€others€resulting€in€acquittals,€mayÏbe€of€such€a€character€that€it€is€impractical€to€redact€the€part€dealing€with€the€dismissedÏcharges.€€However,€the€mandatory€nature€of€the€expunction€statute€means€that€anyÏexception€to€it€must€be€for€cause€shown.€€In€this€respect,€a€blanket€refusal€to€expungeÏany€records€relating€to€a€dismissed€charge€is€inherently€suspect€and€it€is€incumbentÏupon€the€opponent€of€expunction€to€insure€that€the€record€justifies€less€than€fullÏredaction€of€relevant€records.€€In€fact,€this€court€has€previously€ordered€the€expunctionÏof€public€records€of€dismissed€counts€even€though€a€conviction€was€obtained€for€oneÏcount€in€a€multi„count€indictment,€noting€that€the€state€could€not€prohibit€expunction€byÏclaiming€that€the€records€for€the€dismissed€and€convicting€counts€are€intertwined€whenÏit€is€in€the€stateððs€power€to€decide€if€multiple€charges€are€to€be€brought€in€a€singleÏindictment.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Terrence€Liddleóó,€No.€01C01„9508„CR„00280,€Wilson€Co.Ï(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€May€24,€1996).ÌÌà à€We€have€before€us€an€insufficient€record€to€determine€what€may€beÏexpunged.× ƒ0 ××  ×€€Thus,€as€the€state€suggests,€we€remand€the€case€to€the€trial€court€forÏreconsideration€about€whether€redaction€can€be€performed€upon€the€records€withoutÏdestroying€documents€necessarily€relevant€to€the€offenses€for€which€the€petitionersÏwere€convicted.€€To€the€extent€that€redaction€is€found€not€to€be€feasible,€the€recordÏshould€contain€sufficient€evidence€to€show€that€such€a€finding€is€justified.€€Also,€theÏissue€of€recusal€of€the€trial€judge€should€first€be€addressed€to€the€trial€court€forÏappropriate€consideration.€€ÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà à______________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àJoseph€M.€Tipton,€Judge€ÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ_________________________ÌGary€R.€Wade,€JudgeÌÌÌÌ_________________________ÌRobert€E.€Burch,€Special€JudgeÌÌ