ÿWPC9 …# VU:a %› 0(¡w@É4  0l, 0D˜ Ü 0Jä 0T. 0^‚ 0hà 0rH 0|º 0†6 0¼ 1uL 0dÁ U*%B)ODCx AM»ú±v~³vÓ1 B D3! 0@T AO”Æã 0D© D/í B˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 ,†r‰AZ‹"Arial RegularX($¡¡ ^P_E`a PbEcdEeEfgÓ€Ô¡¨ dÔXÔô3|xp((3üÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d!!!!7Border 1dd€-"Cþÿ << Gÿÿ ðÝ ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ ÔÝ  ÝÔ€ ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€ XÔÌÌOctober€8,€1996ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔ  Ôó ó §Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ ÔÝ  ÝÒ € ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€ ôÔÓ  Óà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóWe€only€consider€the€expiration€dates€of€his€current€sentence€because,€having€beenÏconvicted€of€committing€a€felony€while€on€parole,€Appellant€must€serve€the€rest€of€his€term€withoutÏparole€eligibility.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„28„123(b)(1)(1990).ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'@Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Geneva ÒÒ  BA Op Geneva Ò d))))'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ ÔÝ  ÝÒ € ÒÒ „ ÒÑ  ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ7€‡¯XdædÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÙ€€ÙßL€#$";+'h|` ç `€€Lß›à@ àòòIN€THE€COURT€OFÏCRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌà@ àAT€NASHVILLEÌÌà@ àMARCH€1995€SESSIONóóÌÌÌÌÌÌBILLY€NOBLE€FORRESTà àà àà à)ÌœAKA›€BILLY€œSALEEM›€EL„œAMIN,›à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àNO.€œ01C01›„9411„CC„00387Ìà àAPPELLANT,à àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àWAYNE€COUNTYÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌœVS›.à àà àà àà àà àà à)à àHON.€WILLIAM€B.€CAINÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àCIRCUIT€JUDGEà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌJOHN€œREES›,€œWARDEN€and›à àà à)à à(Habeas€Corpus)ÌSTATE€OF€œTENNESSEE,›à àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àœAPPELLEES.›à àà àà à)ÌÌÌÌòòÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:óóà àà àà àà àòòFOR€THE€APPELLEE:óóÌÌJ.€Douglas€œDicus›à àà àà àà àà àCharles€W.€œBurson›ÌAttorney€at€Lawà àà àà àà àà àAttorney€GeneralÌP.€O.€Box€1119à àà àà àà àà àÌœWaynesboro›,€TN€38485à àà àà àà àChristina€S.€œShevalier›Ì(On€Appeal€Only)à àà àà àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌœà àà àà àà àà àà àà àCriminal€Justice€Division›ÌWilliam€Brightà àà àà àà àà àœ450€James€Robertson€Parkway›ÌAssistant€Public€Defenderà àà àà àà àœNashville,€TN€37243„0493l›ÌP.€O.€Box€1208à àà àà àà àà àœ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€›ÌœPulaski›,€TN€38478à àà àà àà àà àœ€Mike€Bottomsà àà àà àà àà àà àà à€€à àà àà àÏDistrict€Attorney€General›Ì(At€Hearing€Only)à àà àà àà àà àœ€›Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àœ€James€G.€White,€II›Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àœ€Assistant€District€Attorney€General›Ìœà àà àà àà àà àà àà à€Lawrence€County€Courthouse›Ìœà àà àà àà àà àà àà à€Lawrenceburg,€TN€38464›ÌÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€___________________ÌÌÌÌJERRY€SCOTT,€SPECIAL€JUDGEÌÌÌÓ  ÓÓÓò òòòÔ€ „Ôà@ àO€P€I€N€I€O€Nó óóóÔ€ XÔÌÌà àThe€œAppellant›€filed€a€pro€œse›€petition€for€the€writ€of€habeas€corpus€in€theÏCircuit€Court€of€Wayne€County.€€Subsequently,€counsel€was€appointed€toÏrepresent€him,€and€an€amended€petition€was€filed.ÌÌà àAppellant€is€currently€serving€a€forty„five€year€sentence€for€robbery€with€aÏdeadly€weapon.€€In€his€petition,€œAppellant›€contends€that€his€forty„five€yearÏsentence€expired€in€1986€and€that€he€is€currently€being€held€illegally.€€He€alsoÏœalleges›€that€the€State€was€improperly€granted€the€hearing€at€which€his€petition€forÏhabeas€corpus€was€denied.€€The€trial€judge€dismissed€his€petition€finding€thatÍœAppellant›€must€œserve›€the€portion€of€his€sentence€from€his€escape€in€1980€to€hisÏextradition€from€New€York€in€1992.ÌÌà àWe€affirm€the€dismissal€of€œAppellantððs›€petition€for€œthe€writ›€of€habeas€corpusÏand€find€that€œAppellant›€must€complete€the€remainder€of€his€forty„five€yearÏsentence.ÌÌà@ àò òòòFACTSó óóóÌÌà àœIn›€January€œ1964,›€œAppellant›€was€sentenced€to€serve€forty„five€years€inÏprison€for€robbery€with€œa€deadly›€weapon.€€Under€the€terms€of€œthat›€sentence,€theÏœAppellant›€would€have€been€eligible€for€parole€as€early€as€1984,€and€his€sentenceÏwould€have€expired€in€1986.€€Upon€the€recommendation€of€the€Board€of€œPardons›Ïand€œParole,›€Governor€œWinfield›€Dunn€commuted€his€sentence€to€twenty€years€onÏDecember€œ15,›€1971.€€ÌÌà àœAppellant›€was€released€on€parole€on€December€20,€1972.€€The€conditionsÏof€his€parole€included€that€he€would,€ð ðlead€the€life€of€a€good€œcitizen;›€obey€all€theÏlaws€of€the€nations,€states€and€œmunicipalities;›€and€shall€not€be€guilty€of€otherÏconduct,€in€the€opinion€of€the€œGovernor›€improper€and€illegal.ðð€€Violation€of€œany€ofÏthe›€conditions€would€result€in€the€revocation€of€the€commuted€sentence.€€TheÏGovernor€would€be€the€sole€determiner€of€whether€œany€of€the›€conditions€had€beenÍviolated.€€Under€œthe€terms€of€his€parole,›€€œAppellant›€resided€at€the€OpportunityÏHouse€in€Davidson€County€and€worked€at€the€Nashville€Painting€Corporation.ÌÌà àOn€August€5,€1973,€œAppellant›€was€arrested€and€charged€with€armedÏrobbery,€carrying€a€weapon,€and€possession€of€marijuana.€€A€parole€violationÏwarrant€was€issued€two€days€later.€€On€August€29,€a€preliminary€hearing€was€heldÏto€determine€if€there€was€probable€cause€to€believe€that€œAppellant›€had€beenÏinvolved€in€the€incident.€€Ultimately,€œAppellant›€was€not€charged€with€œa€parole›Ïviolation€because€œit›€was€unclear€if€he€had€been€involved€with€one€or€six€armedÏrobberies€and€because€the€parole€warrant€had€been€issued€to€prevent€œAppellant›Ïfrom€making€bond.ÌÌà àœAppellant›€attempted€to€contact€his€parole€counselor€on€August€31,€1973,Ïbut€was€told€to€telephone€again€because€his€œcounselor›€was€not€available.€ÏœAppellant›€did€not€contact€his€œparole€officer›€again.€€The€Board€of€Probation€andÏParoles€declared€him€delinquent€on€January€25,€1974.€€He€was€arrested€for€hisÏabsconding€status€on€February€œ3,€1974.›ÌÌà àIn€his€preliminary€hearing€on€March€6,€œAppellant›€first€claimed€that€heÏthought€his€commuted€sentence€expired€in€August€1973.€€He€later€admitted€thatÏhe€was€aware€his€sentence€did€not€expire€until€January€20,€1975.€€The€hearingÍofficer€concluded€that€probable€cause€œexisted€to›€œbelieve›€that€œAppellant›€violatedÏhis€parole€by€absconding€to€avoid€parole€supervision.ÌÌà àœAppellantððs›€parole€revocation€hearing€was€held€May€22,€1974.€€At€theÏconclusion€of€the€hearing€the€Board€told€the€œAppellant›€it€would€recommend€toÏGovernor€Dunn€that€his€parole€be€revoked.€€Revocation€would€result€in€a€paroleÏdate€in€1985€and€a€sentence€expiration€date€in€1986.€€Governor€œWinfield€Dunn›Ïœrevoked›€œthe›€œAppellantððs€commutation›€on€October€28,€1974.ÌÌà àAlmost€one€year€later,€on€September€9,€1975,€œAppellant›€was€convicted€ofÏrobbery€with€a€deadly€weapon,€the€crime€being€committed€while€on€parole.€€OnÏOctober€28,€œ1975€he›€received€a€five€to€seven€year€sentence€for€that€crime.€€TheÏcourt€stated€that€the€sentence€ð ðshall€run€at€the€expiration€of€present€sentence€nowÏbeing€œservedðð›€by€the€œAppellant.›ÌÌà àOn€July€4,€1980,€œAppellant›€escaped€from€the€Tennessee€StateÏPenitentiary,€and€a€warrant€for€his€arrest€was€issued.€€He€remained€on€escapeÏstatus€until€he€was€extradited€from€New€York€and€returned€to€custody€on€April€8,Ï1992.€€The€Department€of€Correction€calculated€that€he€lost€4,296€days€during€hisÏescape.€€He€will€be€eligible€for€probationary€parole€on€January€23,€1999€andÏregular€parole€on€January€23,€2000.€€His€sentence€will€expire€on€July€24,€2000.ÌÌà@ àò òòòDISCUSSIONó óóóÌà@ àò òA.€Dismissal€of€Petition€for€Writ€of€Habeas€Corpusó óÌÌà àœAppellant›€raises€three€issues€concerning€the€dismissal€of€his€petition€ofÏhabeas€corpus€„„€whether€the€petition€was€proper€and€sufficient€under€theÏcircumstances;€whether€the€trial€court€erred€by€dismissing€the€writ€without€aÏbenefit€of€a€full€evidentiary€hearing;€and€whether€the€œAppellant›€is€beingÏincarcerated€for€an€ð ðalleged€escape.ððÌÌà àà àThe€remedy€of€state€habeas€corpus€is€limited€in€scope€to€casesÏwhere€the€judgment€is€void€or€the€term€of€imprisonment€or€other€œrestraint›€hasÏexpired.€€òòArcher€v.€Stateóó,€851€S.W.2d€157,€164€(Tenn.€1993).€€Under€Article€I,ÏœSection›€15€of€the€Tennessee€œConstitution,›€œa€habeas€corpus›€petition€is€proper€atÏany€time€while€œthe›€œprisoner€is›€œincarcerated€€to€contest€a€void€judgment€or€anÏillegal€confinement.›€€œòòId.ó󛀀The€petitioner€has€the€burden€of€proof€œto›€œshow›€that€theÏterm€of€imprisonment€has€expired.€€òòState€ex€rel.€œKuntz›€v.€œBomar›óó,€œ214€Tenn.€500,Ï381›€S.W.2d€œ290,€291„292›€(Tenn.€1964).€€If€the€œpetitioner›€can€establish€by€aÏpreponderance€of€the€evidence€that€his€sentence€has€expired,€he€is€entitled€toÏimmediate€release.€€òòœPassarella›€v.€Stateóó,€891€S.W.2d€619,€627€(Tenn.€œCrim›.€App.Ï1994).ÌÌà àà àœAppellant›€has€failed€to€establish€that€his€term€of€imprisonment€hasÏexpired.€€According€to€the€Tennessee€Sentences€Dates€Inquiry,€œAppellantððs›€termÏwas€to€expire€on€June€10,€1986.€€This€Court€has€repeatedly€held€that,€by€statute,Ïcredit€is€only€available€for€prison€time€œserved›€that€ð ðarises€out€of€theðð€offense€forÏwhich€the€credit€is€claimed.€€òòE.g.óó,€òòSmith€v.€McWherteróó,€1987€WL€6069€(Tenn.€œCrim›.ÏApp.€1987).€€When€œAppellant›€escaped€from€custody€on€July€4,€1980,€he€stoppedÏreceiving€credit€toward€his€sentence.€€That€œAppellant›€was€never€charged€œwith€or›Ïconvicted€for€his€escape€has€no€bearing€on€whether€his€sentence€has€expired.€ÏòòœCf›.óó€òòState€v.€œAbbott›,óó€617€S.W.2d€172,€œ173„74›€(Tenn.€œCrim›.€App.€1981)(finding€thatÏan€escaped€felon€who€was€not€charged€with€the€escape€was€required€to€serve€theÏremainder€of€his€incomplete€sentence.)ÌÌà àà àœAppellant›€also€argues€that€he€was€denied€a€full€evidentiary€hearing.€ÏThe€trial€court€is€not€required€as€a€matter€of€law€to€grant€the€writ€and€conduct€anÏinquiry€into€the€allegations.€œ€Rather€a€petition€that€fails€to€state€a€cognizable€claimÏmay€be€summarily€dismissed€by€the€trial€court.€€òòPassarella›óó,€891€S.W.2d€at€627.€€AÏhearing€is€not€warranted€when€the€facts€alleged€in€the€petition,€even€if€true,€wouldÏnot€serve€as€the€basis€for€œrelief.€€òòde€la€Beckwith€v.€Evattóó,€819€S.W.2d€453,€458Ï(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991)€citing€òòRussell›€v.€Willisóó,€œ222€Tenn.€486,€437›€S.W.2d€529,Ï531€œ(1969)€and€òòState€ex€rel.€Kuntz€v.€Bomaróó,€supra.€€The›€only€facts€in€dispute€areÏthe€dates€of€œAppellantððs›€release.€€However,€the€evidence€œAppellant›€presents€in€hisÏappeal€clearly€shows€that€he€failed€to€serve€the€last€six€years€of€his€1964Íconviction€and€that€he€is€not€entitled€to€be€released.€€Assuming€that€all€theÏdocumentation€œAppellant›€placed€in€his€brief€had€merit,€œAppellant›€would€not€beÏentitled€to€relief€and,€consequently,€an€evidentiary€hearing€is€not€warranted.€ÏHowever,€attachments€to€briefs€are€not€evidence€and€will€not€be€considered€byÏthe€appellate€courts.€€Appellant€is€to€remain€incarcerated€until€he€serves€theÏremainder€of€his€sentence€for€his€1964€conviction.ÌÌà àà àAccording€to€the€1975€conviction€for€armed€robbery,€œAppellant›€is€toÏserve€five€to€seven€years€ð ðat€the€expiration€of€present€sentence€now€beingÏœserved.ð𛀀This€is€consistent€with€Tenn.€R.€œCrim›.€P.€œ32(c)(3)(A),›€which€œprovides›€thatÏa€felon€convicted€œof›€committing€a€felony€while€on€parole€must€serve€œthe›€œsentence›Ïœfor€that€offense€consecutively.›€€Appellant€argues€that€the€record€is€confusing€as€toÏwhether€the€sentence€is€concurrent€or€consecutive€because€the€TennesseeÏœDepartment€of€Correction›€set€release€dates€on€the€1975€conviction€concurrent€toÏthat€of€the€1964€conviction.€€Although€the€œDepartment€determines›€the€length€of€aÏprisonerððs€sentence€by€statute,€it€may€not€alter€sentences€imposed€by€the€Court.€ÏAppellant€is€to€serve€the€term€of€his€1975€conviction€at€the€expiration€of€his€currentÏsentence€on€July€24,€2000.œ× ƒ% ××  ×›ÌÌà@ àò òB.€€Motion€to€Reconsider€under€Tenn.€R.€œCiv›.€P.€60.02ó óÌÌà àà àAppellant€argues€that€the€Court€improperly€granted€the€StateððsÏmotion€to€reconsider€under€Tenn.€R.€œCiv›.€P.€60.02€on€the€grounds€that€the€motionÏwas€ð ðinadequate€and€improper.ðð€€An€adequate€motion€under€60.02€must€state€theÏfacts€justifying€the€invocation€of€the€ð ðextraordinary€reliefðð€provided€by€œthat›€motion.€ÏòòTurner€v.€Turneróó,€776€S.W.2d€88,€92€(Tenn.€App.€1988).€€The€Stateððs€motionÏreads,€in€its€entirety,ÌÒ 0 ÒÒ  ÒÓÓð ðComes€now€the€œState›€of€Tennessee,€by€and€through€MikeÏBottoms,€District€Attorney€General€for€the€Twenty€SecondÏJudicial€District€in€the€above€styled€cause€and€wouldÏrespectfully€move€this€œHonorable›€Court€to€correct€theÏjudgment€under€rule€60.02€of€the€rules€of€civil€procedure.ððÌÌÌÒ € ÒÒ „ ÒÓÓà àà àAlthough€the€motion€is€arguably€deficient,€œAppellant›€failed€to€raiseÏœthat›€issue€œon›€May€œ19€and€June€23,›€1994,€when€the€trial€court€entertained€oralÏarguments€on€the€motion.€€œAppellate›€courts€are€not€required€to€grant€relief€whereÏthe€party€requesting€relief€failed€to€take€actions€that€were€reasonably€available€toÏnullify€or€prevent€the€harmful€effect€of€an€error.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€36(a).€€BecauseÏœAppellant›€had€the€opportunity€to€raise€this€issue€œduring€oral›€arguments€on€May€19Ïand€June€23,€œ1994,€his›€failure€to€make€a€contemporaneous€objection€œserved›€as€aÏœwaiver€of€the€issue€of€the€motionððs€adequacy.›€€òòState€v.€Thomasóó,€818€S.W.2d€œ350,›Ï364€(Tenn.€œCrim›.€App.€1991).ÌÌà àà àœThe›€judgment€of€the€trial€court€œis€affirmed.›ÌÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà àà à_____________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àJERRY€SCOTT,€SPECIAL€JUDGEÌœÌÌCONCUR:›ÌÌÌœÌ_____________________________›ÌJOSEPH€M.€œTIPTON›,€JUDGEÌÌÌœÌ_____________________________›ÌDAVID€G.€HAYES,€œJUDGEÌ›