ÿWPC8  ?Yvv¨±ÑÝ‚2Ј®ÃaìÀ²ƒÐ›ªU‚¾ŽT3 ŽÌ2ŽaqÍÏ-†êÿŠFi1eŽ›Àæ~%eåv.CNNY›®ë"àvWÿ¤ j‚iÃäÃÌÚËÇX9Æ·»¬íîµ?Æ$½(p8ËoŽpÖ|døe#¼vHv ¦ÜZ”'‰D$8Nâj»GÐZ :ºº\ªû~)§c«øôAw»¿ËÔ¿ªÏ0´ÏðÄ”×,xmÒG6CÓ5ŠÙúÇ„·”hb •µ±¼Š[ê»4G^ð:'ïš8øDìÄe¦{<͵\a6`6µC‰m@Õ,vÅRöu¾ËãχùrMQO»V¹!‡:÷ÑUÇ¢þK×.Ð ŠhŽ´QíñÚf®U(W@y°-+ì‹UÚ| >ƒu–¡¶&= Úßf[$ÐPÖ\Çÿ|‚ >„}\ª‚qWúç5ry–⟒Ï4ðÉlÑ*'Í&c“@èÊúº( ’m£ÍBà,¦þßw) ¶ÛòZcMhúUüµ‚ák6E†ë{>.Þ?¾êû!?øoÜêØsÿz=, 8Èn\ƒªÇAýëýýz[Kl {¯±÷ ƒ0[ˆÚÃågìºeªðä¯oMa#!NU>o %­ 0í³UB  4â ö n­ U:² fì R "Z w| N€ ^ ‚ Ž m § ʯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ AQy ÆÊ 0  0 š 0D¤¤ D3è B˜HP LaserJet 8000 DN PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0<èÀ( 9Z &Courier RegularX(ÅÕÐ$¡¡Ñ  ÑÑ7€'CXXdÈXXdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÓiU°X` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXiÓ<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpitpO'3|x«<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXxþ6X@ÉJQX@,†r‰AZ‹"Arial Regular \Ñ\R AØ'ÿ Legal\Ñ Ñ Ü ÑÑ  ÑÕ‘R'L ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ  ÀÝ ƒ[¥J"ÝÓ  ÓÓiU°X` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXiÓÝ  ÝÔ€ X ·XXXÔÔ€ èç'çX X ·ÔÓ  ÓÔ_Ôò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€ ?’ç èç'ÔÐ  ÐÌOctober€18,€1999ÌÌCecil€Ô_ÔCrowsonÔ_Ô,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€Ô_ÔClerkÔdAíÔó óÔ_ÔZ[\]_Cþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(â3¥J$¢¢Ý ƒÕÐ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ8€øXXdêdê8ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÓiU°X` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXiÓÝ  Ý(â3¥J$££Ý ƒÕÐ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ8€øXXdêdê8ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÓiU°X` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXiÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó````'ÿÿdxd dÝ ƒÕÐ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ8€øXXdêdÈ8ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÓiU°X` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXiÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔѰÑÑܰÑÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÓÓÑ€ †ÑÑ€ í:ÑÔ€ X ·XXXÔÑ8€  · XXdæXXdê8ÑÔ_Ô€à8 ¸ àà@Ñ Ñ D¸ Ð ¸ Ð àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ  Ðà@~~%DàAT€KNOXVILLEà@@66-Rà€€€€€€€€€ˆÌßv€Y_@0,j: `€€@ÿEð¡ Žtt¨¦(  Wvßà ¸ àà  à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€AUGUST€1999€SESSION€€€ÌÌÓÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à h àà À à)à  àÐ 80 Ѐà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)Ð   Ðà ¸ àAppellee,€à h àà À à)à  àNo.€03C01„9802„CR„00062Ð ü  Ðà ¸ à€€€€€à  àà h à€€à À à)Ð êâ  Ðà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àWashington€CountyÐ ÐÈ  Ðv.à ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)€€€€€€€€€Ð ¶®  Ðà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  à€Honorable€Arden€L.€Hill,€Judge€€€€€Ð œ”  Ðà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)ÌTOMMY€S.€FRANKLIN,€€à h àà À à)à  à€(Driving€Under€the€Influence„€aiding€and€Ð h` Ðà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  à€abetting)Ð NF Ðà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)€€€€€€€€Ìà ¸ àAppellant.à h àà À à)Ð  Ðà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àÌÌòòFor€the€Appellantóó:à  àà h àà À àà  àòòFor€the€Appelleeóó:Ð ÌÄ ÐÌDebbie€Huskinsà  àà h àà À àà  àPaul€G.€SummersÐ ˜ ÐAssistant€Public€Defenderà h àà À àà  àAttorney€General€of€TennesseeÐ ~v ÐPost€Office€Box€996à h àà À àà  àà p àandÐ d\ ÐJohnson€City,€TN€37605à h àà À àà  àTodd€R.€KelleyÐ JB Ð(AT€TRIAL)à ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€Attorney€General€of€Tennessee€Ð 0 ( Ðà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à425€Fifth€Avenue€Northà x àà Ð àÐ ! Ðà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àNashville,€TN€37243ÌJulie€A.€RiceÌPost€Office€Box€426à h àà À àà  àJoe€C.€CrumleyÐ È#À  ÐKnoxville,€TN€37901„0426à h àà À àà  àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÐ ®$¦! Ð(ON€APPEAL)à  àà h àà À àà  àà p àandÐ ”%Œ" Ðà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àMichael€LaguardiaÌà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€District€AttorneyÌà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àPost€Office€Box€38Ìà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJonesborough,€TN€37659ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:____________________ÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌJoseph€M.€TiptonÌJudgeÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÐ >:639 Їà@õõ)Dàòòò òO€P€I€N€I€O€Nóóó óˆÐ  ÐÌÌÌÓÓà ¸ àThe€defendant,€Tommy€S.€Franklin,€appeals€as€of€right€from€his€convictionÐ ¦ ž Ðby€a€jury€in€the€Washington€County€Criminal€Court€for€driving€under€the€influence€(DUI)„Ð r j Ðaiding€and€abetting,€a€Class€A€misdemeanor.€€He€was€sentenced€to€eleven€months€andÐ >6 Ðtwenty„nine€days,€of€which€five€days€were€to€be€spent€in€the€county€jail€with€theÐ    Ðremainder€on€probation.€€He€was€fined€fifteen€thousand€dollars.€€On€appeal,€theÐ ÖÎ  Ðdefendant€contends€that€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€support€his€conviction.€€WeÐ ¢š  Ðaffirm€the€judgment€of€conviction.€Ð nf ÐÌà ¸ àAt€trial,€Johnson€City€Police€Officer€Mike€Butler€testified€that€on€JanuaryÐ þ Ð27,€1996,€he€responded€to€an€accident€involving€the€defendant€at€about€10:30€p.m.€€HeÐ ÒÊ Ðsaid€that€upon€arrival,€he€saw€a€truck€that€had€been€hit,€and€the€driver€stated€thatÐ ž– Ðanother€vehicle€had€hit€him€and€stopped€further€up€the€road.€€Officer€Butler€said€heÐ jb Ðfound€the€defendantððs€car€up€the€street.€Ð 6 . ЀHe€testified€that€EMS€workers€were€examining€the€defendant€at€a€nearby€apartment.€Ð "ú ÐHe€said€the€defendant€stated€that€ð ðtheyðð€hit€him.€€Officer€Butler€said€the€defendant€hadÐ Î#Æ  Ðhis€car€keys€in€his€pocket.Ð š%’" ÐÌà ¸ àOfficer€Butler€testified€that€the€defendant€was€very€intoxicated.€€He€saidÐ 2)*"& Ðthe€defendant€was€staggering,€had€slurred€speech€and€was€glassy„eyed.€€He€said€thatÐ þ*ö#( Ðthe€defendantððs€blood€alcohol€content€was€.34€and€that€the€defendant€failed€the€fieldÐ Ê,Â%* Ðsobriety€tests.€€Officer€Butler€said€that€as€he€prepared€to€administer€a€blood€alcohol€test,Ð –.Ž', Ðthe€defendant€told€him€that€he€had€not€been€driving€the€car.€€Officer€Butler€stated€thatÐ b0Z). Ðthe€defendant€went€back€and€forth€on€the€issue€of€who€was€driving€the€car.€€He€said€theÐ .2&+0 Ðdefendant€initially€stated€that€he€was€driving.€€He€said€the€defendant€later€said€he€hadÐ ú3ò,2 Ðconsumed€too€much€alcohol€to€be€driving.€€He€said€the€defendant€could€not€name€orÐ Æ5¾.4 Ðdescribe€the€person€who€was€driving.Ð ’7Š06 Їà ¸ àThe€defendant€testified€that€he€draws€disability€for€alcoholism.€€HeÐ  Ðadmitted€that€he€had€a€previous€conviction€for€aggravated€robbery.€€He€said€that€onÐ ÔÌ ÐJanuary€27,€he€drove€to€the€Silver€Spur€and€drank€with€some€men.€€He€said€he€becameÐ   ˜ Ðtoo€intoxicated€to€drive,€and€he€asked€one€of€the€men€to€drive€him€home.€€When€askedÐ l d Ðif€he€knew€the€driver,€the€defendant€stated€that€ð ða€drunk€is€a€drunk,€and€I€donððt€knowÐ 80 Ðwho€he€was.ðð€€The€defendant€said€that€on€their€way€home,€his€car€was€sideswiped.€€TheÐ ü  Ðdefendant€said€he€exited€his€car€and€went€to€an€apartment€to€telephone€for€help.€€HeÐ ÐÈ  Ðsaid€that€the€man€driving€his€car€ran€off€and€that€he€had€not€seen€him€again.€Ð œ”  ÐÌà ¸ àThe€defendant€testified€that€the€men€with€whom€he€was€drinking€wereÐ 4, Ðdrinking€harder€than€he€was.€€He€admitted€to€letting€a€drunk€person€drive€his€car,€but€heÐ ø Ðlater€stated€that€the€driver€looked€fine.€€He€said€the€only€thing€he€could€remember€aboutÐ ÌÄ Ðthe€driver€was€that€he€had€long€brown€hair.€€He€said€he€did€not€go€back€to€the€SilverÐ ˜ ÐSpur€to€try€to€find€the€driver€because€he€would€be€tempted€to€drink.€€Upon€the€foregoingÐ d\ Ðproof,€the€defendant€was€convicted€of€DUI„€aiding€and€abetting.Ð 0 ( ÐÌà ¸ àThe€defendant€contends€that€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€support€hisÐ È#À  Ðconviction.€€He€argues€that€the€state€did€not€prove€that€the€person€who€drove€his€carÐ ”%Œ" Ðwas€intoxicated.€€The€state€contends€that€the€evidence€is€sufficient.Ð `'X $ ÐÌà ¸ àOur€standard€of€review€when€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€is€questionedÐ ø*ð#( Ðon€appeal€is€ð ðwhether,€after€viewing€the€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€theÐ Ä,¼%* Ðprosecution,€òòanyóó€rational€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€the€essential€elements€of€theÐ .ˆ', Ðcrime€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.ðð€€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€319,€99€S.€Ct.Ð \0T). Ð2781,€2789€(1979).€€This€means€that€we€do€not€reweigh€the€evidence€but€presume€thatÐ (2 +0 Ðthe€jury€has€resolved€all€conflicts€in€the€testimony€and€drawn€all€reasonable€inferencesÐ ô3ì,2 Ðfrom€the€evidence€in€favor€of€the€state.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Sheffieldóó,€676€S.W.2d€542,€547Ð À5¸.4 Ð(Tenn.€1984);€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.€1978).€Ð Œ7„06 ÐÑ í:Ñâ  âÑÜÜÑÑÑâ  âÑ  Ñà ¸ àThe€statute€prohibiting€DUI€provides€as€follows:Ð  ÐÓÓÓ  Óà8 ¸ àIt€is€unlawful€for€any€person€to€drive€or€to€be€in€physical€controlÐ ÔÌ Ðof€any€automobile€or€other€motor€driven€vehicle€on€any€of€theÐ º ² Ðpublic€roads€and€highways€of€the€state,€or€on€any€streets€orÐ   ˜ Ðalleys€.€.€.€while:І ~¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ¸ à(1)€Under€the€influence€of€any€intoxicant€.€.€.;€orÐR J¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ¸ à(2)€The€alcohol€concentration€in€such€personððs€blood€or€breathÐ   Ðis€ten„hundredths€of€one€percent€(.10%)€or€more.€Ðü ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÓ«$ÓÌÓÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„401(a).€€Pursuant€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„201,€anyÐ ÐÈ  Ðperson€who€aids€or€abets€in€the€commission€of€driving€while€under€the€influence€of€anÐ œ”  Ðintoxicant€as€a€principal,€agent€or€accessory€is€guilty€of€DUI.Ð h` ÐÌà ¸ àThe€defendant€contends€that€the€state€did€not€prove€that€the€driver€of€theÐ ø Ðdefendantððs€car€was€intoxicated.€€However,€at€trial,€the€defendant€admitted€that€he€let€aÐ ÌÄ Ðdrunk€person€drive€his€car.€€He€stated€that€ð ða€drunk€is€a€drunk,€and€I€donððt€know€whoÐ ˜ Ð[the€driver]€was.ðð€€He€stated€that€the€men€with€whom€he€was€drinking€were€drinkingÐ d\ Ðharder€than€he€was.€€The€jury€obviously€accredited€this€portion€of€the€defendantððsÐ 0 ( Ðtestimony.€€In€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€state,€we€hold€that€the€evidence€isÐ ü!ô Ðsufficient.€€òòSeeóó€òòWilliams€v.€Stateóó,€352€S.W.2d€230,€230€(Tenn.€1961)€(holding€that€theÐ È#À  Ðdefendant€ð ðwas€the€owner€of€the€car,€was€present€on€the€front€seat€with€[the€driver],Ð ”%Œ" Ðpermitted€him€to€drive€the€car,€knowing€he€was€drunk,€and€thus€was€guilty€of€[DUI].ðð).Ð `'X $ ÐÌà ¸ àIn€consideration€of€the€foregoing€and€the€record€as€a€whole,€we€affirm€theÐ ø*ð#( Ðjudgment€of€conviction.Ð Ä,¼%* ÐÌÓÓà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àÌà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àà È à_________________________Ð B1:*/ Ðà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àJoseph€M.€Tipton,€JudgeÐ (2 +0 ÐÌÌÌÌÌÌÐ r8j17 ÐCONCUR:Ð  ÐÌÌÌ__________________________Ð   ˜ ÐJohn€Everett€Williams,€JudgeÐ † ~ ÐÌÌÌ___________________________Ð   ÐAlan€E.€Glenn,€JudgeÐ ü  Ð