ÿWPC{  ŒüÈBp&ò#ÙI'é_KãÓ8a î²Aná‹Ü°1½f¯Ÿ=é(?Ž%&4ºMÄX³Ò+å®9ãËoHÔØTE?ˆbÉ ™0±Lzß §º @îl)æcœõ ×s]Ëeì'ýfˆçW}!~ƒùú€ó¥fr rVEÐ ‚1ÎDi7ˆ+D0·:u÷)·CÏE Z¬z¸ùšL!j°¥ÿÏÆuJì]â%E«— ;¶F`kÐñlžB¶t«‡ÍqóÏêú@§\ÊÜ%Èôùò} n½Ã:Ñô‡çüx#p½fÿëoE’€hk™¨‹Þ3·ÁnbÑ×öz>_3õ&¨)¼Oà¦WòÁÍÓ—¢ËÌ9/~©¿zï·s[FÌ3ÿ’›> ¸aî£Ø‘›ãVgf­lë@#MªUű{† »Ëøu»IøP¯QÍ7UpWT”‰T&’¹‡3Ú"…"‰± ’Ê7G)ò€Å¤ýÇ<'í:…A»Ìsf÷×^<4.z¦«èGU0‘¦œ²5 ™»i˜e¬±,²Ï2.d‘Ç®,# hUNs %Á 0(ÇU :ïb)w@14q…”&œU: Büü 0D D3]]]] AQÆá 0D§ 0Dë D// B^ ˜HP LaserJet 4HPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLÜÏ(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡,Ù¹6 AZ‹"Arial Regular- ù- ÷UøDùUúDûüDýDþÿDÓ€V&3|x  Ý ƒ(¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€ XKXXXÔÔ€ q X XKÔÓ  ÓÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€ XKX  qÔÐ  ÐÌò òApril€13,€1999Ð šš ÐÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ ô›˜ ôX XKÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular d(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý'ÿÿdxd'(!)*Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó++'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýññ›ññÑ` °ÑÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€ŠŸŠXXÔÔ€Š¦úŠŠŠŸÔÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ€ÑÑ7€u,XXdìdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÓ  Óò òññßr€& "<,(j 8` `€€@E f ` ttx$X` ð Úrß›ññIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÐ `  ÐÌAT€KNOXVILLEÌÌOCTOBER€SESSION,€1998ÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à À àà  à)à p àC.C.A.€NO.€03C01„9804„CR„00129Ð ` Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àó óÐ `  Ðà ` àà ¸ àAppellee,ò òà h àà À àà  à)à p àGREENE€COUNTYÐ `  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)ÌV.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)€€€€€€€à p àHON.€JAMES€E.€BECKNER,€JUDGEÐ `  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àÐ `  ÐBOBBY€DALE€FRANKLIN,€SR.à  à)à p à(AGGRAVATEDó ó€ò òSEXUAL€ó óÐ ` Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àò òà  à)ó óà p àò òBATTERY;€AGGRAVATED€RAPE;€ó óÐ ` Ѐà ` àà ¸ àAppellant.à h àà À àò òà  à)à p àRAPE€OF€A€CHILD)€Ð ` Ðó óÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à h àà À àà  àòòà p àFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:Ð Hè ÐÌò òGREG€W.€EICHELMANà h àà À àà  àà p àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUP€Ð 8Ø Ðó óDistrict€Public€Defenderà h àà À àà  àà p àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÐ 8 Ø ÐÌò òMICHAEL€A.€WALCHERó óà À àà  àà p àò òELIZABETH€B.€MARNEYÐ ("È Ðó óAssistant€Public€Defenderà À àà  àà p àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÐ (#È Ð1609€College€Park€Driveà h àà À àà  àà p à2nd€Floor,€Cordell€Hull€BuildingÐ  $À ÐMorristown,€TN€37813à h àà À àà  àà p à425€Fifth€Avenue€North€Ð %¸ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àNashville,€TN€€37243ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òC.€BERKELEY€BELL,€JR.Ð (  Ðó óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÐ )   Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òERIC€D.€CHRISTIANSENó óÐ ð*!" Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à109€South€Main€Street,€Suite€501Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àGreeneville,€TN€37743ÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED€________________________ÌÌAFFIRMED€AS€MODIFIED€ÌÌTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGEÐ  70./S ÐÓ  ÓÔ€°ð°ŠŠ¦úÔò òòòOPINIONóóó óÔ€Š¦úа°ðÔÐ `  ÐÌÌÌÓ  ÓÓÓà ` àThe€Defendant,€Bobby€Dale€Franklin,€appeals€as€of€right€his€convictions€forÏaggravated€sexual€battery,€aggravated€rape,€and€rape€of€a€child,€following€a€jury€trialÏin€the€Criminal€Court€of€Greene€County.€€The€convictions€are€as€follows:ÌÓÓÌà ` àòòOFFENSEóóà  à€à h àà À àà  àà p àòòDATE€OFóóà  àà x àòòSENTENCEóóÐ æ†  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àòòOFFENSEóóà  àÐ Þ~  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à(as€alleged€inÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àpresentment)à x àà Ð àÐ În ÐÌCount€One:€€€€aggravated€sexual€batteryà p àbetween€March€à x àtwelve€(12)€yearsÐ ¾^ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à1990€and€___Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à1992à È àÐ ®N ÐÌCount€Two:€€€€aggravated€sexual€batteryà p à___€1992à  àà x àtwelve€(12)€yearsÐ ž> ÐÌCount€Three:€€aggravated€rapeà  àà p àsummer€1992à x àtwenty„five€(25)€years€Ð Ž. ÐÌCount€Four:€€€€rape€of€a€childà À àà  àà p àbetween€___à x àtwenty„five(25)€yearsÐ ~! Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à1992€and€Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à___€1993ÌÌCount€Five:€€€€€rape€of€a€childà À àà  àà p àJune€3,€1995à x àtwenty„five€(25)€yearsÐ ^%þ ÐÌCount€Six:€€€€€€€rape€of€a€childà À àà  àà p àJune€4,€1995à x àtwenty„five(25)€yearsÐ N'î ÐÌCount€Seven:€€aggravated€sexual€batteryà p àbetween€June€5à x àtwelve€(12)€yearsÐ >)Þ  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àand€June€9,€1995ÌÌCount€Eight:€€€€aggravated€sexual€batteryà p àJune€29,€1992à x àtwelve€(12)€yearsÐ &,Æ"# ÐÓýÓÌThe€trial€court€ordered€his€four€convictions€for€rape€to€run€consecutively€with€eachÏother€and€concurrent€to€the€four€convictions€for€aggravated€sexual€battery,€for€anÏeffective€sentence€of€100€years.€€In€this€appeal,€Defendant€raises€the€following€sixÏ(6)€issues:€ÌÌâ âÓÓÐ ¾8^/0 Ðà8 ` àà ¸ àÔ‡R@RŠŠ¦úÔ€Ô#†Š¦úŠRR@g#Ô€I.à8` (#` (#àWhether€the€trial€court€erred€in€admitting€certainÐ `  Ðâ âtestimony;Ð Ð Ð  ÐÓ(ÓÓÓÌà8 ` àà ¸ àÔ‡,,ß,ŠŠ¦úÔ€Ô#†Š¦úŠ,,,ßt#Ô€II.à8` (#` (#àWhether€the€trial€courtððs€verdict€forms€were€€€€€€€€€€€€Ð ” 4 Ðimproper;Ð Ð Ð  Ðà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àÐ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðà8 ` àà ¸ àÔ‡,|‹,ŠŠ6ƒÔ€Ô#†Š6ƒŠ,,|‹ó#ÔIII.à8` (#` (#àWhether€Count€Four€should€be€dismissed€(CountÐ | ÐFive€of€the€presentment);Ð Ð Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà ¸ àIV.à8` (#` (#àWhether€the€trial€court€erred€in€excluding€certainÐ d  Ðtestimony;Ð Ð Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà ¸ à€V.à8` (#` (#àWhether€the€trial€court€erred€in€allowing€theÐ Lì  Ðtestimony€of€Dr.€Reardon€regarding€penetration;Ïand€Ð Ð Ð  Ðà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à€Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðà ` àà ¸ àVI.à8  àWhether€the€trial€court€committed€sentencing€errors.Ó®ÓÐ,Ì(#(# ÐÓÓÌÓÝÓAfter€a€careful€review€of€the€record,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.ÌÓÓÌÓWÓÓ  ÓòòSummary€of€the€FactsÐ üœ ÐóóÓÓÌÓ€ÓÓ»Óà ` àTestimony€at€trial€revealed€that€on€June€9,€1995,€the€twelve„year„old€victim,ÏT.S.€€(we€will€use€the€initials€rather€than€the€full€name€of€the€victim),€insisted€on€goingÏto€work€with€her€mother.€€While€the€mother€and€daughter€were€in€the€car,€the€victimÏstarted€crying€and€said€that€Defendant,€the€victimððs€stepfather,€had€raped€her.€€TheÏmother€immediately€notified€authorities€and€took€T.S.€to€the€hospital€emergencyÏroom€to€be€examined.ÌÓÓÌÓ» Óà ` àDr.€Donald€Verlin€Tucker,€Jr.€examined€T.S.€at€the€emergency€room€and€hisÏexamination€revealed€a€history€of€sexual€abuse€consistent€with€that€which€she€hadÏtold€him.€€He€testified€that€he€examined€the€victim€five€days€after€the€penileÏpenetration€had€allegedly€occurred.€€He€testified€that€the€genitalia€examination€wasÏnormal€except€for€the€absence€of€a€hymen.€€€Ìâ âÐ ,8Ì.0 Ðà ` àDr.€Peter€Reardon,€an€obstetrician/gynecologist,€took€a€medical€history€of€theÏâ âvictim€on€June€14,€1995,€which€included€her€statement€that€she€had€bled€for€twoÏdays€after€penile€penetration€on€Sunday,€June€4,€1995,€and€had€experienced€twoÏother€vaginal€penetrations,€one€digitally€and€one€orally.€€Dr.€Reardon€discovered€twoÏsmall€broken€areas€on€the€victimððs€hymen€when€doing€a€pelvic€examination,€butÏfound€no€recent€trauma€to€the€vagina€or€any€lacerations.€€Dr.€Reardon€said€that€a€Ïð ðrecent€traumaðð€to€the€hymen€takes€about€six€to€eight€days€to€heal€after€being€tornÏand€that€after€ten€days€it€would€look€like€a€healed€wound.€ÌÌà ` àThe€victim€testified€at€trial€about€various€types€of€sexual€abuse€inflicted€byÏDefendant,€described€the€circumstances€surrounding€each€incident€of€abuse,€andÏgave€approximate€dates€for€most€incidents€based€on€where€the€family€was€living,Ïwhat€car€the€family€was€driving,€and€birthdays€of€family€members.€€The€time€span€forÏDefendantððs€sexual€abuse€occurred€over€a€seven„year€period€beginning€when€T.S.Ïwas€five€and€ending€when€she€was€12.ÌÌà ` àT.S.€testified€that€her€family€moved€to€the€ð ðblockhouseðð€when€she€was€aboutÏfive€years€old€and€that€a€barn€was€located€on€the€property.€€While€the€family€lived€inÏthe€ð ðblockhouse,ðð€Defendant€took€the€victim€to€the€barn€to€feed€the€cats.€€In€the€barn,ÏDefendant€placed€her€on€stacked€bales€of€hay,€removed€her€panties,€and€fondledÏher.€€T.S.€€did€not€tell€her€mother€about€this€incident€before€June€9,€1995,€althoughÏshe€testified€that€she€believed€that€this€incident€occurred€in€1987.à Ð àà (# àÐ 2°(* Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àÌÌà ` àIn€1990,€when€the€victim€had€finished€the€second€grade,€the€family€moved€toÏa€house€on€Snake€Hollow€Road.€€At€that€time,€the€family€owned€a€red€Thunderbird.€Ð Ð9p02 ÐThe€victim€said€that€she€and€Defendant€were€in€the€red€Thunderbird€travelingÏtowards€the€familyððs€prior€residence,€the€ð ðblockhouse,ðð€when€Defendant€beganÏð ðplaying€with€himself,ðð€pulled€to€the€side€of€the€road,€and€stopped€the€car.€€DefendantÏthen€walked€to€the€passenger€side€of€the€car,€removed€the€victimððs€ð ðbottom€clothes,ððÏand€started€rubbing€her€vagina€and€masturbating.€€Defendant€ejaculated€on€T.S.€andÏwiped€the€ejaculate€off€with€his€bandana€handkerchief.€€The€victim€did€not€tell€herÏmother€about€this€incident€before€June€9,€1995,€because€she€was€afraid€thatÏDefendant€might€hurt€her€by€ð ðwhippingðð€her.€€Upon€objection€by€Defendant,€the€trialÏcourt€instructed€the€jury€to€disregard€the€victimððs€statement€about€DefendantÏð ðwhippingðð€her.€€Defendant€moved€for€a€mistrial€based€on€that€statement,€but€the€trialÏcourt€overruled€it.ÌÌà ` àT.S.€testified€that€while€she€and€Defendant€€were€riding€in€a€red€Buick€car€heÏhad€purchased€that€day,€Defendant€said€he€needed€to€go€to€his€employerððs€garageÏto€roll€up€the€windows€of€his€garbage€truck.€€Other€proof€showed€that€the€vehicle€wasÏpurchased€on€June€29,€1992.€€While€the€victim€was€sitting€in€the€Buick,€she€lockedÏthe€car€doors€because€she€was€afraid€that€Defendant€ð ðmight€try€something.ðð€€AfterÏDefendant€told€the€victim€to€unlock€the€doors,€he€took€her€out€of€the€car,€laid€her€onÏa€pallet,€removed€her€panties,€got€on€top€of€her,€and€began€rubbing€his€penis€againstÏher.€€When€the€victim€said€ð ðyou€promised€you€wouldnððt€do€this€again,ðð€Defendant€toldÏher€that€this€was€the€last€time.ÌÌà ` àSometime€before€her€brotherððs€August€22nd€birthday€in€an€unspecified€year,ÏDefendant,€the€victim,€and€her€brother€were€taking€items€to€the€garage€at€the€SnakeÏHollow€Road€residence.€€Defendant€sent€the€victimððs€brother€to€feed€the€chickens.€ÏWhen€Defendant€and€T.S.€were€alone€in€the€garage,€Defendant€rubbed€her€vagina,Ð Ð9p02 Ðmasturbated,€ejaculated,€and€wiped€the€ejaculate€off€her€with€his€bandanaÏhandkerchief.€€T.S.€stated€that€ð ðthis€happened€several€times,€about€four€or€fiveÏtimes.ððÌÌà ` àOn€another€occasion,€Defendant€was€standing€beside€the€Buick€with€his€pantsÏunzipped€and€his€penis€exposed€while€the€victimððs€mother€was€mowing€the€yard.€ÏDefendant€forced€T.S.€to€put€her€mouth€on€his€penis€and€to€perform€fellatio.€€ÌÌà ` àDuring€the€wintertime€after€the€year€1990,€Defendant€used€Vaseline€that€wasÏkept€on€the€victimððs€motherððs€dresser€to€penetrate€the€victim€digitally€in€the€adultsððÏbedroom.€ÌÌà ` àOn€the€Saturday€after€school€ended€in€1995,€Defendant€came€into€the€victimððsÏbedroom€while€victim€was€reading€a€book,€pulled€down€her€shorts€and€panties,€andÏsaid€he€was€checking€to€see€if€she€had€ð ðbeen€with€any€boys.ðð€€Then€he€performedÏcunnilingus€on€her.€€After€telling€her€he€was€going€to€do€what€he€ð ðusuallyðð€did,€heÏrubbed€her€vagina,€masturbated,€ejaculated,€and€wiped€the€ejaculate€off€with€hisÏbandana€handkerchief.€€Neither€the€victimððs€mother€nor€brother€were€at€home€duringÏthis€incident.ÌÌà ` àOn€June€4,€1995,€again€while€her€mother€and€brother€were€away€from€theÏhouse,€Defendant€penetrated€the€victim€with€his€penis€in€the€victimððs€bedroom.€ÏDefendant€told€T.S.€that€he€would€kill€her€if€she€told€anyone.€€The€victim€was€cryingÏand€bleeding€from€the€penetration€and€she€continued€to€bleed€for€two€days.Ìâ âÐ à7€.0 Ðà ` àOn€June€7,€1995,€Defendant,€the€victim,€and€her€brother€went€to€Kinser€Park.Ïâ âThey€had€been€on€their€way€to€visit€the€childrenððs€mother€at€work,€but€learned€thatÏthe€mother€could€not€get€off€to€see€them.€€As€the€victim€and€Defendant€walkedÏthrough€the€woods€at€Kinser€Park€looking€for€a€place€to€fish,€Defendant€beganÏplaying€with€the€victimððs€breasts€through€her€clothes.€€T.S.€said€that€she€tried€to€getÏaway,€but€Defendant€told€her,€ð ðIf€you€try€to€get€away€it€makes€me€want€you€more.ððÌÌà ` àAt€the€conclusion€of€the€victimððs€testimony€on€direct€examination,€counsel€forÏDefendant€objected€to€her€statement€that€Defendant€had€sexually€battered€her€fourÏor€five€times€in€the€Snake€Hollow€garage.€€The€basis€for€defense€counselððs€objectionÏwas€that€these€were€ð ðother€bad€actsðð€not€covered€by€the€Bill€of€Particulars.€ÏOverruling€the€motion€for€a€mistrial,€the€court€stated€that€the€charges€could€beÏdefined€specifically€enough€to€avoid€any€jury€confusion.ÌÌà ` àSamera€Zavaro,€a€forensic€scientist€with€the€TBI,€testified€that€the€fitted€bottomÏsheet€from€the€victimððs€bed€tested€positive€for€blood€and€semen.€She€further€testifiedÏthat€after€DNA€testing€on€the€bed€sheet,€Defendant€could€not€be€excluded€as€theÏcontributor€of€the€sperm€on€the€victimððs€bed€sheet.€ÌÌà ` àDefendant€testified€and€denied€that€he€had€molested€or€had€sex€with€hisÏstepdaughter.ÌÌà ` àThe€jury€found€Defendant€guilty€of€four€counts€of€aggravated€sexual€batteryÏand€four€counts€of€rape€of€a€child.€€As€reflected€in€the€judgment€form,€the€trial€courtÏchanged€one€of€the€child€rape€convictions€(Count€Three)€to€aggravated€rape€Ïbecause€the€State€was€not€able€to€establish€that€it€occurred€after€July€1,€1992,€theÐ Ð9p02 Ðeffective€date€of€the€ð ðrape€of€a€childðð€statute.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„522;Ð `  ÐòòState€v.€Caseóó,€884€S.W.2d€146,€147€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994).Ð P ð ÐòòÌà@u u DàI.€€Admissibility€and€Effect€of€Certain€TestimonyóóˆÐ 0Ð ÐÌà ` àDefendant€argues€in€this€issue€that€the€ð ðState€was€allowed,€over€objection,€toÏintroduce€irrelevant€prejudicial€uncharged€conduct.ðð€€Specifically,€DefendantÏcontends€that€the€victim€was€allowed€to€testify€about€an€incident€that€was€time„barredÏby€the€statute€of€limitations.€€Defendant€asserts€that€the€count€of€the€presentmentÏcharging€this€offense€had€already€been€dismissed.€€He€also€contests€the€victimððsÏtestimony€that€Defendant€ð ðwhipped€her€hardðð€and€that€he€sexually€assaulted€her€ð ðfourÏor€five€timesðð€in€the€garage€at€the€Snake€Hollow€residence.€€Finally,€he€argues€thatÏit€was€improper€for€the€victimððs€mother€to€testify€that€Defendant€had€threatened€to€killÏher€and€to€hurt€the€victim.€ÌÌà ` àFirst,€Defendant€contends€that€the€victim€was€allowed€to€testify€to€an€allegationÏof€aggravated€sexual€battery€that€was€dismissed€as€being€time„barred€by€the€statuteÏof€limitations.€€This€incident€allegedly€occurred€in€1987€when€the€victim€was€œaboutñôññôññ÷ñÌñ÷ññøññôñÐ  @,à"$ Ðñôññøññõñ›€ñõñfive›€years€old.€€The€victim€testified€that€Defendant€took€her€to€the€barn€to€feed€theÏcats,€and€there€he€removed€her€panties€and€fondled€her.€€First€of€all,€Defendant€hasÏwaived€this€claimed€error€on€appeal€because€he€did€not€enter€a€contemporaneousÏobjection€to€the€testimony.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€36(a);€òòState€v.€Killebrewóó,€760€S.W.2dÐ 2°(* Ð228,€235€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1988).€€However,€evenÐ 4 *, Ðif€this€issue€is€addressed,€it€is€without€merit.€€The€record€does€not€indicate€whatÏhappened€to€this€particular€count,€so€we€cannot€say€whether€this€count€wasÏdismissed€or€severed.€€There€should€be€no€uncertainty€regarding€the€status€of€œañùññùññûñÐ Ð9p02 ÐñûññüññùñÐ Ð9p02 Ðñùññüññúñ›€ñúñcount›€of€a€presentment,€and€it€should€be€noted€that€it€is€the€responsibility€of€theÏappellant€to€present€an€adequate€record€for€review€on€appeal.€€Regardless,€thisÏcharge€would€not€œbe€time„barred,›€as€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„2„¼101(d)€and€(e)€which€became€effective€in€1985,€is€applicable€to€this€charge.€€òòSeeóóÐ 0Ð ÐòòMorgan€v.€Stateóó,€847€S.W.2d€538,€540€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1992)€(òòcitingóó€1985€Acts,Ð  À Ðch.€478,€ðð€21).€This€statute€states€that€prosecution€for€aggravated€sexual€battery,Ïamong€other€offenses,€had€to€commence€no€later€than€the€date€the€child€attains€theÏage€of€majority€or€within€four€(4)€years€after€the€commission€of€the€offense,Ïwhichever€occurs€later.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„2„101(d).€€Therefore,€prosecutionÏwould€have€had€to€commence€in€1991€or€before€the€victim€reached€the€age€of€18.€ÏIn€the€instant€case,€commencement€of€prosecution€for€this€offense€occurred€in€1997Ïat€which€time€the€victim€was€only€14€or€15€years€old.ÌÌà ` àSecond,€Defendant€has€also€waived€any€objection€to€the€victimððs€testimonyÏthat€Defendant€took€her€to€the€Snake€Hollow€garage€and€sexually€battered€her€ð ðfourÏor€five€timesðð€because€Defendant€again€made€no€contemporaneous€objection€to€thisÏtestimony.€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€36(a);€òòKillebrewóó,€760€S.W.2d€at€235.€€At€the€œconclusionñýññöñÐ  `(  ÐñöññýññþñÐ `(  Ðñþññÿñ›Ð `(  Ðñÿñof›€the€victimððs€testimony€on€direct€examination,€defense€counsel€did€object€to€thisÏstatement€and€asked€for€a€mistrial.€€The€court€said€that€the€charges€could€be€definedÏspecifically€enough€to€avoid€any€jury€confusion.€€€The€trial€court€did€give€a€juryÏinstruction€explaining€the€limited€purpose€of€the€evidence€and€explained€that€anyÏevidence€that€Defendant€had€committed€a€crime€or€crimes€other€than€those€chargedÏcould€not€be€considered€to€prove€his€disposition€to€commit€the€charged€crimes.€€TheÏjury€is€deemed€to€have€followed€the€courtððs€instruction,€and€we€find€the€instructionÏsufficient€to€cure€any€prejudice€to€Defendant.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Harrisóó,€839€S.W.2d€54,Ð à7€.0 Ð72€(Tenn.€1992).€€€Ð Ð9p02 Ðà ` àÌà ` àNext,€Defendant€did€make€a€contemporaneous€objection€to€the€victimððsÏtestimony€that€she€was€afraid€of€Defendant€because€he€ð ðwhipped€her€hard.ðð€€In€theÏpresence€of€the€jury,€defense€counsel€asked€for€an€instruction€concerning€theÏtestimony€about€the€whipping,€and€the€court€instructed€that€ð ðthe€jury€should€disregardÏthat€and€not€consider€it€for€any€purpose.ðð€€The€jury€is€presumed€to€have€followed€theÏtrial€courtððs€instruction.€€òòIdóó.€€Moreover,€this€testimony€by€the€witness€does€notÐ p& Ðð ðaffirmatively€appear€to€have€affected€the€result€of€the€trial€on€the€merits.ðð€€Tenn.€R.ÏCrim.€P.€52(a).€€Accordingly,€any€error€that€occurred€as€a€result€of€this€victimððsÏunsolicited€statement€was€harmless.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€36(b).ÌÌà ` àFinally,€Defendant€states€that€the€victimððs€mother€should€not€have€beenÏallowed€to€testify€that€Defendant€had€threatened€to€kill€her€and/or€hurt€the€victim.€ÏDefendant€did€not€make€a€contemporaneous€objection.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€36(a).€Ð 4 *, ÐIn€any€event,€we€do€not€find€this€evidence€to€have€affected€the€result€of€this€trial.€ÏTenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€52(a).€€This€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÐ Ð9p02 ÐòòÓ  ÓII.€€Verdict€FormsóóÐ P*ð " ÐÓ†SÓñðñœñðñœÌ›à ` àIn€his€second€issue,€Defendant€claims€that€the€trial€courtððs€verdict€formsÏconstituted€improper€commentary€on€the€facts.€€The€verdict€forms€submitted€to€theÏjury€specified€the€eight€charged€crimes€as€follows:ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à[Count€One]€after€the€parties€moved€to€Snake€HollowÏRoad€(after€March,€1990)€and€before€the€partiesÏpurchased€a€Buick€automobile€(June,€1992),€when€theÏdefendant€and€the€victim,€[€],€were€in€a€red€FordÏThunderbird€and€were€going€to€their€former€residence,€theÏblock€house;Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÐ Ð9p02 Ðà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à[Count€Two]€at€the€Snake€Hollow€Road€residence€in€theÏsummer€of€1992€during€daylight,€in€the€garage;Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à[Count€Three]€by€forcing€[€],€the€victim,€to€perform€fellatioÏon€[Defendant]€at€the€home€on€Snake€Hollow€Road€afterÏJune€29,€1992,€the€date€of€purchase€of€the€BuickÏautomobile€and€at€the€back€of€the€Buick;Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à[Count€Four]€by€the€digital€penetration€of€[the€victim],€whichÏoccurred€in€the€fall€of€1993€and€before€Thanksgiving€DayÏin€the€defendantððs€bedroom;Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à[Count€Five]€by€cunnilingus€on€June€3,€1995€of€[the€victim]Ïin€her€bedroom€at€the€Snake€Hollow€Road€residence;Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à[Count€Six]€in€her€[the€victimððs]€bedroom€on€Sunday,€JuneÏ4,€1995;Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à[Count€Seven]€on€Wednesday,€June€7,€1995€at€KinserÏPark€while€[Defendant]€and€the€victim,€[€],€were€walking€inÏthe€woods;Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à[Count€Eight]€at€the€Snake€Hollow€Road€residenceÏbetween€March,€1990€and€June€9,€1995€and€while€theÏdefendant€and€the€victim,€[€],€were€test„driving€the€BuickÏ(purchased€on€6„28„92)€and€in€the€garage€of€theÏdefendantððs€employer.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌÌÓºTÓà ` àAfter€reviewing€the€verdict€forms,€we€find€that€the€trial€court€did€not€offerÏunnecessary€commentary€on€the€facts€as€alleged€by€Defendant.€€Rather,€the€formsÏcontain€enough€specific€information€to€comply€with€the€requirement€that€the€StateÏelect€the€particular€offenses€for€which€convictions€were€sought.€€òòSeeóó€òòStateóó€òòv.Ð H+è!# ÐSheltonóó,€851€S.W.2d€134€(Tenn.€1993);€òòBurlison€v.€Stateóó,€501€S.W.2d€801€(Tenn.Ð 8-Ø#% Ð1973).€€Since€the€victim€did€testify€to€many€sexual€crimes€committed€by€Defendant,Ïthe€trial€court€ensured€unanimity€in€the€juryððs€decision€by€being€specific€in€the€verdictÏforms.€€òòSeeóó€òòSheltonóó,€851€S.W.2d€at€137.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.à Ð àÐ 3¨)+ ÐñðñœñðñÓ  ÓòòÓÓÌIII.€€Dismissal€of€Count€FouróóÐ ð5,. Ðâ âÓ¨^ÓÓ·^ÓÐ è6ˆ-/ Ðà ` àIn€his€third€issue,€Defendant€claims€that€Count€Four€should€be€dismissedÏâ âbecause€the€victimððs€testimony€as€to€when€the€digital€penetration€occurred€did€notÏspecify€a€year.€€Defendant€contends€that€without€a€specific€year€the€jury€could€notÏdetermine€if€the€digital€penetration€was€ð ðan€alleged€aggravated€rape€or€a€child€rape.ðð€ÏWe€note€that€the€count€Defendant€is€contesting€is€Count€Five€in€the€presentment€andÏCount€Four€on€the€verdict€form€and€judgment.€ÌÌà ` àDefendant€fails€to€cite€any€authority€to€support€his€argument,€and€therefore€thisÏissue€should€be€waived.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€27(a)(7);€òòState€v.€Dickersonóó,€885Ð à€ ÐS.W.2d€90,€93€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1993).€€However,Ð Ðp Ðeven€if€this€issue€is€addressed,€it€is€without€merit.€€ÌÌà ` àThe€count€in€the€presentment€Defendant€contests€alleges€the€following:ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à[Defendant],€between€___,€1992,€and€___,€1993,Ïunlawfully€committed€the€offense€of€rape€of€a€child€byÏknowingly€engaging€in€unlawful€sexual€penetration€ofÏ[victim],€a€child€less€that€thirteen€years€of€age,€by€stickingÏhis€finger€inside€her€vagina;€a€class€A€felony€in€violation€ofÏT.C.A.€39„13„522,€and€against€the€peace€and€dignity€of€theÏState€of€Tennessee.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÓóbÓñðñœñðñà ` àPrior€to€July€1,€1992,€the€unlawful€sexual€penetration€of€a€victim€less€thanÏthirteen€(13)€years€of€age€was€designated€as€aggravated€rape.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÏ39„13„502(a)(4)(1991).€€That€portion€of€the€€aggravated€rape€statute€referring€toÏvictims€under€thirteen€(13)€years€of€age€was€then€ð ðmoved€to€ðð€39„13„522.ðð€ÏSentencing€Commission€Comments,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„502.€€In€fairness€toÏDefendant,€panels€of€this€Court€have€indicated€that€it€was€codified€ð ðas€a€separate,Ïnew€crimeðð€at€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„522.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Banesóó,€874€S.W.2d€73,Ð ø4˜+- Ð78,€n.4€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1994).€€However,Ð è6ˆ-/ Ðthe€elements€of€aggravated€rape€of€a€child€less€than€13€years€of€age€are€identical€toÐ Ø8x/1 Ðthe€elements€of€rape€of€a€child.€€The€classification€of€the€offense€as€an€A€felonyÏremained€the€same.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€39„13„502(b)€and€„522(b).€€The€onlyÐ P ð Ðsignificant€difference€is€that€each€sentence€for€convictions€of€an€offense€occurringÏon€or€after€July€1,€1992,€must€be€served€undiminished€by€sentencing€credits.€€òòSeeóóÐ 0Ð ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„523.€€The€undiminished€sentencing€provision€of€rape€ofÏa€child€requires€a€showing€that€the€penetration€occurred€on€or€after€July€1,€1992,Ïbefore€one€can€be€convicted€of€the€offense€designated€as€rape€of€a€child.€€If€thereÏis€insufficient€proof€that€the€offense€occurred€on€or€after€July€1,€1992,€one€could€onlyÏbe€convicted€of€aggravated€rape.€This€situation€is€akin€to€one€where€a€sentence€forÏa€specified€crime€increases€after€a€certain€date.€€Under€such€circumstances,€aÏperson€must€be€sentenced€within€the€parameters€of€the€sentence€existing€at€the€timeÏof€the€òòoffenseóó,€not€the€time€of€òòsentencing.óóÐ °P ÐÌà ` à€€€At€trial,€the€victimððs€testimony€did€not€specify€when€the€offense€occurred.€ÏTestimony€in€regards€to€this€count€was€as€follows:ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àœState:à0h¸ Ð ¸ Ð àIððve›€asked€the€court€officer€to€pass€to€youÐ p& ÐExhibit€#16.€€Would€you€look€at€that,€please?€ÏDo€you€recognize€that?Ð hÐ hÐ  Ðà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àÐ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àVictim:à h àYes.ÐP*ð "¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àState:€à h àWhere€was€that€jar€of€Vaseline€kept?Ð@,à"$¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àVictim:à h àOn€my€motherððs€dresser.Ð0.Ð$&¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ЀÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à.€.€.€Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àœState:à0h¸ Ð ¸ Ð àDid›€you€ever€have€occasion€to€be€inÐ 2°(* Ð[Defendantððs]€bedroom?Ð hÐ hÐ  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àVictim:à h àYes.Ðø4˜+-¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àœState:à0h¸ Ð ¸ Ð àDid›€you€ever€have€occasion€to€.€.€.€.€excuseÐ è6ˆ-/ Ðme,€let€me€ask€the€question€this€way.€€On€anÏoccasion€that€you€were€in€his€bedroom€did€itÏinvolve€Exhibit€#16,€that€jar€of€Vaseline?ÐÐ9p02hÐ hÐ  Їà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àVictim:à h àYes.Ð` ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àState:à h àDo€you€remember€when€that€occurred?ÐP ð¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àVictim:à h àI€know€it€was€in€the€winter.Ð@ ภР¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àœState:à0h¸ Ð ¸ Ð àDo›€you€know€whether€or€not€it€was€before€orÐ 0Ð Ðafter€Thanksgiving€Day?Ð hÐ hÐ  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àVictim:à h àI€believe€it€was€before.и ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àState:€à h àDo€you€know€what€year€it€was?Ш ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àVictim:à h àI€cannot€recall.Ðø˜ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àœState:à0h¸ Ð ¸ Ð àWas›€it€there€at€the€Snake€Hollow€RoadÐ èˆ Ðresidence?Ð hÐ hÐ  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àVictim:à h àYes.ÐÐp¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àœState:à0h¸ Ð ¸ Ð à[D]o›€you€remember€whether€it€was€before€orÐ À` Ðafter€the€purchase€of€the€Buick?Ð hÐ hÐ  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àVictim:à h àI€donððt€recall.ШH¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àœState:ñêñà0h¸ Ð ¸ Ð àñêñWould›€you€tell€the€ladies€and€gentlemen€ofÐ ˜!8 Ðthe€jury€what€happened€on€the€occasionÏinvolving€the€jar€of€Vaseline?Ð hÐ hÐ  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àœVictim:ñëñà h àñëññìñà0h¸ Ð ¸ Ð àñìñIt›€was€in€his€bedroom€and€my€motherððs€roomÐ x% Ðand€[Defendant]€had€took€[sic]€the€jar€ofÏVaseline€and€put€it€on€his€finger€and€pulledÏmy€pants€down€and€he€stuck€his€finger€in€myÏvagina€and€I€told€him€that€it€hurt€me.€€HeÏpulled€his€finger€back€out€and€told€me€to€getÏup.Ð hÐ hÐ  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àState:à h àDid€you€tell€your€mother€about€that?Ð8-Ø#%¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àVictim:à h àNo,€I€did€not.Ð(/È%'¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÓ²lÓÌà ` àThe€foregoing€testimony€demonstrates€that€the€State€did€not€establish€theÏexact€date€that€this€particular€incident€occurred.€€The€only€time€frame€the€victim€couldÏtestify€to€was€that€it€occurred€after€they€moved€to€the€Snake€Hollow€residence€whichÏwas€earlier€established€as€being€sometime€in€the€year€1990.€€The€count€in€theÏpresentment€dealing€with€the€digital€rape€states€that€Defendant€stuck€his€fingerÐ Ð9p02 Ðinside€the€victimððs€vagina€ð ðbetween€___,€1992,€and€___,€1993.ðð€€The€Bill€ofÏParticulars€states€that€the€single€incident€of€digital€penetration€occurred€beforeÏThanksgiving€Day€of€1993.€€However,€contrary€to€the€Stateððs€argument,€this€is€notÏenough€to€satisfy€the€Stateððs€burden€of€proving€that€the€incident€occurred€after€JulyÏ1,€1992,€in€order€to€establish€rape€of€a€child.€€These€documents€were€not€admittedÏinto€evidence€and€it€was€the€Stateððs€burden€to€clearly€establish€through€evidence€atÏtrial€when€the€alleged€incident€occurred.ÌÌà ` àHowever,€to€dismiss€this€count€altogether€would€be€an€extreme€misplacementÏof€form€over€substance.€€The€act€of€ð ðunlawful€sexual€penetration€of€a€victimðð€who€ð ðisÏless€than€thirteen€(13)€years€of€age,ðð€did€not€cease€being€a€crime€at€midnight€onÏJune€30,€1992;€it€merely€ceased€being€codified€at€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„502.€ÏòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„522(a).€€Again,€the€elements€of€aggravated€rape€andÐ   @ Ðrape€of€a€child€are€the€same€and€the€State€did€prove€beyond€a€reasonable€doubtÏDefendantððs€guilt€of€the€unlawful€sexual€penetration€of€a€child€less€than€thirteen€yearsÏof€age.€€However,€since€the€State€did€not€clearly€establish€when€the€incidentÏoccurred,€we€hold€that€Defendant€is€guilty€of€aggravated€rape€instead€of€rape€of€aÏchild€in€Count€Four€(Count€Five€of€the€presentment).€€The€judgment€must€beÏmodified€accordingly.ÌÓ  ÓòòÌIV.€€Excluded€TestimonyÌÓŽÓÌà ` àóóIn€this€issue,€Defendant€contends€that€he€was€prevented€from€presenting€aÐ 4 *, Ðdefense€when€the€trial€court€excluded€testimony€that€the€victim€had€contact€with€ð ðsexÏâ âtoys,ðð€that€she€appeared€to€engage€in€sexual€conduct€with€her€brother,€€that€herÐ à7€.0 Ðbrother€had€raped€a€cousin,€and€that€she€had€knowledge€of€the€male€anatomy€andÏphysiology.òòÐ P ð Ðâ âà ` àÌà ` àóóEvidence€of€a€victimððs€sexual€behavior€other€than€the€sexual€act€or€acts€atÐ 0Ð Ðissue€is€governed€by€Tennessee€Rule€of€Evidence€412.€€Rule€412€does€apply€toÏcases€involving€the€rape€of€a€child.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Terrell€Dion€Cowansóó,€C.C.A.€No.Ð °  Ð02C01„9610„CC„00359,€Henry€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Jackson,€Nov.€20,€1997),Ð    Ðòòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1998).€€The€rule€limits€the€admissibility€of€evidenceÐ ð  Ðof€specific€acts€of€sexual€conduct€of€the€victim,€as€well€as€evidence€of€the€victimððsÏsexual€reputation.òòÐ Ðp ÐÌà ` àóóAt€issue€is€the€provision€which€may€permit€the€admission€of€sexual€behaviorÐ °P Ðof€the€victim€with€persons€other€than€Defendant€ð ðto€prove€or€explain€the€source€ofÏsemen,€injury,€disease,€or€knowledge€of€sexual€matters.ðð€€Tenn.€R.€Evid.Ï412(c)(4)(ii).€€ð ðKnowledge€of€sexual€mattersðð€is€often€sought€to€be€introduced€in€childÏsexual€abuse€cases.€€Where€the€Stateððs€proof€suggests€that€the€child€victimððsÏknowledge€of€sexual€matters€resulted€solely€from€the€incident€with€the€defendant,€theÏdefendant€is€permitted€to€show€that€the€victim€acquired€the€familiarity€from€sexualÏactivity€with€third€persons.€Advisory€Commission€Comments,€Tenn.€R.€Evid.€412.ÌÌà ` àHowever,€before€evidence€regarding€a€victimððs€ð ðknowledge€of€sexual€mattersððÏis€admissible,€the€trial€court€must€first€determine€that€the€probative€value€of€theÏevidence€outweighs€its€unfair€prejudice€to€the€victim.€€Tenn.€R.€Evid.€412(d)(4).€€InÏholding€that€the€evidence€was€inadmissible,€the€court€stated€the€following:ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àNone€of€that€is€admissible€except€.€.€.€I€guess€maybeÏunless€I€should€have€said,€specific€instances€of€conduct.€ÏSo€what€you€have€to€first€have€is€a€specific€instance€of€aÐ Ð9p02 Ðvictimððs€sexual€behavior,€is€it€admissible€unless€submittedÏin€accordance€with€such€and€such?Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àConsent€is€not€an€issue.€€If€it€were€someone€other€than€theÏaccused€it€can€only€be€used€to€rebut€or€explain€scientific€orÏmedical€evidence€which€is€not€the€case.€€To€prove€orÏexplain€the€source€of€semen,€injury,€disease€or€knowledgeÏof€sexual€matters,€which€is€not€the€case.€€Or€to€proveÏconsent,€which€is€not€an€issue.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ЀÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à.€.€.€Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àSomebody€playing€with€.€.€.€I€donððt€think€playing€with€aÏvibrator€would€ever€be€admissible,€that€I€can€conceive.€ÏSeeing€someone€attempting€to€have€sex€would€not€beÏadmissible.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÓ"ŠÓÓÓÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àThe€only€evidence€that€I€have€ever€seen€that€could€comeÏin€and€I€think€if€you€read€all€of€412€itððs€clear,€is€.€.€.€haveÏyou€read€the€definition€of€sexual€behavior?€€It€meansÏsexual€activity€of€the€alleged€victim€other€than€the€sexualÏact€thatððs€the€issue€in€the€case.€€Sexual€activity€is€defined,Ïisnððt€it?€€Letððs€look€at€it.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àThe€definition€of€sexual€behavior€is€sexual€activity€ofÏsomeone€other€than€the€defendant,€and€to€be€admissibleÏit€has€to€be€a€specific€instance€of€a€victim€of€sexualÏbehavior€for€the€purpose€of€proving€consent€which€is€notÏan€issue,€medical€evidence€which€is€not€an€issue,€behaviorÏof€the€accused€which€is€not€an€issue€.€.€.€.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àThe€only€thing€Iððve€seen€a€court€let€in€are€where€one€said,ÏððYes,€I€had€consensual€sex€with€her,ðð€and€then€youððve€gotÏto€remember€it€says€.€.€.€for€knowledge€of€sexual,€the€factÏthat€someone€may€have€attempted€to€have€sex€with€theÏvictim€or€the€victim€may€have€played€with€a€so„called,Ïquote,€sex€toy,€does€not€impute€knowledge€of€copulation.ÏI€donððt€believe€any€court€would€stretch€it€that€far.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àÐ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à.€.€.€Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àI€just€donððt€believe€under€any€stretch€of€the€imaginationÏthat€any€court€would€ever€allow€those€submissions€toÏcome€in€under€Rule€412.òòÐ3¨)+¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÓBŽÓÌóóà ` àBy€comments€the€trial€court€made€in€holding€the€evidence€inadmissible,€it€isÐ ð5,. Ðapparent€that€the€court€below€found€the€incidents€had€no€probative€value.€€We€agreeÏwith€the€trial€courtððs€conclusion.€€A€decision€regarding€Rule€412€will€not€beÐ Ð9p02 Ðoverturned€absent€a€showing€that€the€determination€was€an€abuse€of€the€trial€courtððsÏdiscretion.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Shelineóó,€955€S.W.2d€42,€46€(Tenn.€1997).€€Defendant€hasÐ P ð Ðfailed€to€show€how€denying€the€evidence€was€an€abuse€of€the€trial€courtððs€discretion.€ÏThis€issue€is€without€merit.ÌœñìñœñìñòòñíñÌñíññðñ›ñðññíñÌñíññðñ›ñðññíñÌñíññðñ›ñðññîñÌñîñ›à ` àà ¸ àÌÓ  ÓV.€Admissibility€of€Dr.€Reardonððs€TestimonyóóÐ Ðp ÐÓd—ÓÌà ` àIn€this€issue,€Defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€allowing€Dr.ÏReardon€to€testify€as€to€his€impression€concerning€penetration€and€in€allowing€theÏintroduction€of€Exhibit€30€which€was€Dr.€Reardonððs€complete€examination€of€theÏvictim.ÌÌà ` àDefendant€fails€to€cite€any€authority€in€support€of€this€issue€and€it€shouldÏtherefore€be€treated€as€waived.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€27(a)(7);€òòDickersonóó,€885€S.W.2dÐ P*ð " Ðat€92„93;€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòKillebrewóó,€760€S.W.2d€at€231„32.€€In€addition,€the€record€revealsÐ @,à"$ Ðthat€Defendant€did€not€make€a€contemporaneous€objection€to€the€testimony€of€Dr.ÏReardon€or€any€objection€to€the€admission€of€Exhibit€30€and€this€issue€should€beÏwaived€for€these€reasons€as€well.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€36(a).€ÌÌà ` àDefendantððs€motion€in€limine€requested,€in€pertinent€part,€that€the€trial€courtÏâ âredact€ð ð[a]ny€oral€statement€made€by€the€child€in€this€case€to€physicians€that€is€[sic]Ð à7€.0 Ðnot€for€purposes€of€diagnosis€and€treatment.ðð€€It€should€be€noted€that€the€recordÏcontains€no€Order€disposing€of€this€motion.€€Ìâ âÌà ` àHowever,€even€addressed€on€the€merits,€Defendantððs€argument€must€fail.€€OnÏdirect€examination,€Dr.€Reardon€testified€that€he€took€a€medical€history€from€theÏvictim,€that€the€history€was€important€for€purposes€of€diagnosis€and€treatment,€andÏthat€the€victim€had€told€him€of€three€specific€incidents€of€penetration.€€Dr.€ReardonÏsaid€that€his€physical€examination€led€him€to€conclude€that€partial€penetration€by€aÏmale€penis€of€the€victim€was€possible€and€was€consistent€with€the€history€that€theÏvictim€gave€him.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÌÓ  ÓòòVI.€€SentencingóóÐ °P ÐÓ~žÓÌà ` àIn€this€issue,€Defendant€argues€that€the€court€erred€in€finding€threeÏenhancement€factors,€finding€no€mitigating€factors,€and€in€ordering€the€sentences€onÏthe€four€rape€convictions€to€be€served€consecutively.ÌÌà ` àWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€length,€range,€or€the€manner€of€service€ofÏa€sentence,€this€court€has€a€duty€to€conduct€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€of€the€sentence€withÐ @,à"$ Ða€presumption€that€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€This€presumption€is€"conditioned€upon€the€affirmativeÏshowing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencing€principles€andÏall€relevant€facts€and€circumstances."€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.Ð 4 *, Ð1991).Ìâ âÐ à7€.0 Ðà ` àIn€conducting€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€of€a€sentence,€this€Court€must€consider€theÐ `  Ðâ âevidence€adduced€at€trial€and€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€presentence€report,€theÏprinciples€of€sentencing,€the€arguments€of€counsel€relative€to€sentencingÏalternatives,€the€nature€of€the€offense,€and€the€defendantððs€potential€forÏrehabilitation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210;€òòState€v.€Parkeróó,€932€S.W.2d€945,€955„Ð  À Ð56€(Tenn.€Crim€App.€1996).Ìà ` àÌà ` àIf€our€review€reflects€that€the€trial€court€followed€the€statutory€sentencingÏprocedure,€imposed€a€lawful€sentence€after€having€given€due€consideration€andÏproper€weight€to€the€factors€and€principals€set€out€under€the€sentencing€law,€and€thatÏthe€trial€court's€findings€of€fact€are€adequately€supported€by€the€record,€then€we€mayÏnot€modify€the€sentence€even€if€we€would€have€preferred€a€different€result.€€òòState€v.Ð °P ÐFletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€Upon€review€of€the€record,Ð   @ Ðwe€find€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€proper€sentencing€principles€and€stated€itsÏreasons€and€findings€on€the€record.€€Therefore,€review€by€this€court€is€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€withÐ €$  Ða€presumption€of€correctness.€€However,€even€though€trial€court€considered€theÏproper€sentencing€principles,€we€hold,€as€specified€below,€that€the€court€erroneouslyÏapplied€two€enhancement€factors€and€failed€to€consider€one€mitigating€factor.ÌÌòòA.€€Length€of€SentencesóóÐ 0.Ð$& Ðà ` àThe€trial€court€found€that€three€enhancement€factors€were€applicable€to€allÏoffenses€for€which€Defendant€had€been€convicted:ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(a)€The€personal€injuries€inflicted€upon€the€victim€wereÏparticularly€great;Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àÐ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(b)€The€offense€involved€a€victim€and€was€committed€toÏgratify€the€defendantððs€desire€for€pleasure€or€excitement;Ïand€Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àÐÐ9p02¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(c)€The€defendant€abused€a€position€of€private€trust.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÓ¦¨ÓÌòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(6),€(7)€and€(15).Ð H è ÐÌà ` àIn€applying€enhancement€factor€(6),€the€trial€court€stated€the€following:ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àNow,€weððve€had€no€evidence€in€the€case€fromÏpsychologists€or€psychiatrists€about€the€consequences€ofÏthe€defendantððs€criminal€acts€upon€her,€although€she€wasÏvery€young,€and€the€evidence€was€that€the€defendantððsÏabuse€of€her€sexually€began€at€age€five.€€But€I€did€observeÏher€demeanor€while€she€was€testifying€and€she€was€veryÏdistraught€throughout€her€testimony,€she€cried€and€sobbedÏalmost€throughout€her€testimony.€€Certainly€theÏobservation€this€Court€would€make,€in€looking€at€her€asÏcompared€with€other€victims€of€similar€age€who€haveÏtestified€in€this€court€in€other€cases€over€a€period€of€time,Ïis€that€she€obviously€suffers€greatly€from€the€things€thatÏhave€been€done€to€her€and€I€think€that€#6€is,€in€fact,€anÏenhancement€factor€in€the€case.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÓŠ«Óà8 ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àÐ ` (#` (# Ðà ` àThe€term€ð ðpersonal€injuryðð€as€used€in€enhancement€factor€(6)€is€broad€enoughÏto€embrace€the€emotional€injuries€and€psychological€scarring€sustained€by€the€victimÏof€a€sexual€offense.€€òòSee€e.g.óó,€òòState€v.€Melvinóó,€913€S.W.2d€195,€203€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð x% ÐApp.),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1995);€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€891€S.W.2d€922,€930Ð h' Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1994).€€However,€before€thisÐ X)ø! Ðfactor€may€be€used€to€enhance€a€sentence€within€the€appropriate€range,€the€StateÏmust€establish€that€the€emotional€injuries€and€psychological€scarring€are€ð ðparticularlyÏgreat.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(6);€òòseeóó€òòState€v.€Lorenzo€Puente€Salazaróó,Ð (/È%' ÐC.C.A.€No.€02„C„01„9105„CR„00098,€Shelby€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Jackson,ÏJan.€15,€1992).€€In€òòSalazaróó,€this€Court€held€the€following:Ð 3¨)+ ÐÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àClearly,€rape€is€injurious€òòper€seóó€to€the€body€and€mind€ofÐ ø4˜+- Ðthe€victim.€€In€this€regard,€the€legislature€has€seen€fit€toÏenhance€the€offense€to€aggravated€rape€if€a€child€isÏinvolved.€€In€consideration€of€this€automatic€enhancement,Ïit€is€questionable€that€a€trial€court€is€entitled€to€rely€solelyÏupon€the€age€of€the€victim€as€a€basis€to€find€that€theÐ Ð9p02 Ðmental€trauma€is€ððparticularly€great.ðð€€Further,€the€record€isÏtotally€devoid€of€any€evidence€from€which€the€trial€courtÏcould€determine€that€the€mental€disturbance€shown€in€theÏrecord€was€greater€than,€less€than,€or€equivalent€to€thatÏwhich€is€ordinarily€involved€with€this€serious€offense.€€Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÓé²ÓÌòòIdóó.€at€7„8.€€à ¸ àÐ (È ÐÌà ` àThe€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€in€òòState€v.€Kissingeróó,€922€S.W.2d€482,€487„88Ð ¨  Ð(Tenn.€1996),€looked€for€medical€or€psychological€proof€to€determine€if€the€victimððsÏinjuries€were€ð ðparticularly€great.ðð€€Finding€none,€the€court€determined€that€applicationÏof€enhancement€factor€(6)€was€inappropriate.ÌÌà ` àIn€the€instant€case,€the€State€did€not€present€any€evidence€as€to€the€childððsÏpsychological€injuries.€€No€psychiatrists€or€psychologists€testified€as€to€any€emotionalÏscarring€the€victim€had€suffered,€and€no€evidence€was€presented€that€the€victimÏrequired€counseling€for€her€emotional€injuries.€€òòButóó€òòseeóó€òòcontraóó,€òòState€v.óó€òòJohn€ClaudeÐ ˆ#( ÐWells,€IIIóó,€C.C.A.€No.€01„C„01„9505„CR„00146,€Davidson€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,Ð x% ÐNashville,€June€6,€1997),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1998);€òòState€v.€Robert€J.Ð h' ÐBurton,€Sr.óó,€C.C.A.€No.€02C01„9507„CC„00193,€Weakley€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,Ð X)ø! ÐJackson,€June€10,€1996),€òòperm.€to€appealóó€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1996).€€The€evidence€ofÐ H+è!# Ðphysical€injury€to€the€victim€in€this€case€was€a€partial€tear€to€her€hymen€and€herÏtestimony€that€she€bled€for€two€days€following€penetration.€€òòButóó€òòseeóó€òòcontraóó,€òòState€v.Ð (/È%' ÐJames€Lloyd€Julian,€IIóó,€C.C.A.€No.€03C01„9511„CV„00371,€Loudon€County€(Tenn.Ð 1¸') ÐCrim.€App.,€Knoxville,€July€24,€1997),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1998);€òòState€v.Ð 3¨)+ ÐRoy€L.€Sherrodóó,€C.C.A.€No.€02„C„01„9510„CR„00331,€Shelby€County€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð ø4˜+- ÐApp.,€Jackson,€July€26,€1996),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1997).€€Accordingly,Ð è6ˆ-/ Ðwe€find€that€although€the€victim€certainly€suffered€injuries,€those€injuries€were€notÐ Ø8x/1 Ðð ðparticularly€greatðð€as€contemplated€by€the€statute€for€enhancement€purposes.€ÏTherefore,€enhancement€factor€(6)€should€not€have€been€applied€to€any€of€theÏconvictions.Ìà ` àÌà ` àRelative€to€enhancement€factor€(7),€Defendant€argues€that€there€is€nothing€inÏthe€record€to€show€that€he€committed€the€offenses€to€gratify€his€desire€for€pleasureÏor€excitement.€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-114(7).€€€In€applying€this€factor€to€theÐ    Ðconvictions,€the€trial€court€stated€the€following:ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àThe€character€of€rape€has€many€faces.€€It€can€be€one€ofÏoppression,€of€male€dominance,€of€punishment,€or€it€canÏbe€for€pleasure€and€excitement.€€I€think€the€evidence€inÏthis€case€clearly€show€that€it€was€to€gratify€the€defendantððsÏdesire€for€pleasure€or€excitement,€and€I€think€thatÏdistinguishes€this€case€in€an€enhancement€way,€and€so€IÏbelieve€that€is€a€valid€enhancement€consideration.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÓ³¿Óà ` àÌà ` àInitially,€we€note€that€a€necessary€element€of€aggravated€sexual€battery€asÏcharged€is€sexual€contact€which€is€defined€as€the€intentional€touching€of€an€intimateÏpart€or€the€clothing€over€such€intimate€part€"for€the€purpose€of€sexual€arousal€orÏgratification."€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€€ðð€39-13-501(6);€òòseeóó€òòKissingeróó,€922€S.W.2d€atÐ h' Ð489-90€(Tenn.€1996).€Because€a€factor€cannot€be€applied€if€it€is€also€an€essentialÏelement€of€the€offense€as€charged€in€the€indictment,€enhancement€factor€(7)€isÏinapplicable€to€the€four€aggravated€sexual€battery€convictions.€€ÌÓÓÌÓýÃÓà ` àHowever,€factor€(7)€is€not€an€essential€element€of€aggravated€rape€or€rape€ofÏa€child€and€may€be€considered€as€an€appropriate€enhancement€factor.€€òòSeeóó€òòStateÐ 2°(* Ðv.€Adamsóó,€864€S.W.2d€31,€34-35€(Tenn.€1993).€€In€òòKissingeróó,€our€supreme€court€Ð 4 *, Ðrecognized€the€difficulties€in€establishing€factor€(7):€€ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àEnhancement€factor€(7),€unlike€most€of€the€otherÏsentencing€factors,€calls€into€question€a€defendant'sÏreasons€for€committing€a€crime.€Human€motivation€is€aÐ Ð9p02 Ðtangled€web,€always€complex€and€multifaceted.€To€proveÏdefendant's€motives€will€always€be€a€difficult€task.€But€theÏlegislature,€in€its€wisdom,€has€placed€that€obligation€on€theÏstate€when€the€state€seeks€an€enhanced€sentence.€Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌ922€S.W.2d€at€491.€ÌÌÌÓ’ÅÓà ` àWe€are€of€the€opinion€that€the€State€met€its€burden€of€proof€in€this€case€thatÏthe€rape€was€sexually€motivated€to€gratify€Defendantððs€desire€for€pleasure€orÏexcitement.€€There€were€several€instances€of€sexual€conduct€by€Defendant€with€theÏvictim€occurring€on€different€occasions.€Defendant€penetrated€the€victim€by€insertingÏhis€penis€in€the€victim's€vagina,€the€victim€performed€fellatio€on€Defendant,€andÏDefendant€performed€cunnilingus€on€the€victim.€€The€victim€testified€as€follows€aboutÏone€incident:ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à[Defendant]€pulled€down€my€shorts€and€panties€and€heÏtold€me€that€he€had€to€check€and€see€if€I€had€been€withÏany€boys.€€Then€he€stuck€his€tongue€in€my€vagina.€€Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà ` àà ¸ à.€.€.ÌÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à[A]fter€he€got€done€he€told€me,€he€said,€ððNo,€you€havenððtÏbeen€with€any€boys,ðð€and€then€he€said,€ðð[victim€],€Iððm€goingÏto€do€what€I€usually€do,ðð€and€then€he€started€rubbing€myÏvagina€and€masturbating€and€then€he€ejaculated€on€meÏand€then€he€wiped€it€off€with€a€handkerchief.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌÓ¦ÉÓIn€regards€to€the€incident€of€penile€penetration,€the€victim€testified€that€she€asked€theÏvictim€to€stop€and€he€asked€her,€ð ðDo€you€want€me€to€hurry€up€and€get€done,ðð€and€sheÏtold€him€that€she€did.€€€ÌÌà ` àAlthough€orgasm€is€insufficient,€in€and€of€itself,€to€establish€that€DefendantÏcommitted€rape€to€gratify€his€desire€for€pleasure€or€excitement,€when€that€fact€isÏviewed€along€with€other€circumstances€in€the€case,€we€find€this€factor€to€beÏappropriate.€€òòSeeóó€òòKissingeróó,€922€S.W.2d€at€490„91.€Despite€Defendant's€denial€thatÐ à7€.0 Ðhe€committed€the€offenses,€the€evidence€supports€the€application€of€factor€(7)€by€aÐ Ð9p02 Ðpreponderance€of€the€evidence.€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Carteróó,€908€S.W.2d€410,€413€(Tenn.Ð `  ÐCrim.€App.),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1995)€(preponderance€of€the€evidenceÐ P ð Ðstandard€applies€to€factual€determinations€necessary€for€enhancement€factor).ÏFurthermore,€the€jury€concluded€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€the€defendant'sÏintentional€touching€was€for€the€purpose€of€sexual€arousal€or€gratification€to€convictÏthe€defendant€of€four€counts€of€aggravated€sexual€battery.€Under€theseÏcircumstances,€we€hold€that€the€record€supports€the€application€of€factor€(7)€inÏsentencing€Defendant€for€the€aggravated€rape€and€rape€of€a€child€convictions.€€ÌÌà ` àThe€court€also€found€as€an€enhancement€factor€the€Defendant€abused€aÏposition€of€private€trust.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(15).€€We€note€that€DefendantÏdoes€not€specifically€contest€the€application€of€this€factor€on€appeal.€€We€believe€thisÏenhancement€factor€clearly€applies,€and€obviously€the€trial€court€gave€it€great€weight.€ÏDefendantððs€status€as€stepfather€while€living€with€the€victimððs€mother€is€a€sufficientÏbasis€for€sentence€enhancement€under€factor€(15).€€òòAdamsóó,€864€S.W.2d€at€34.€€AÐ €$  Ðmore€serious€violation€of€private€trust€is€hard€to€imagine.€€Accordingly,€we€find€thatÏthis€enhancement€factor€appropriate€for€all€convictions.ÌÌà ` àIn€conclusion,€we€find€that€enhancement€factor€(6)€is€inapplicable€to€all€eightÏconvictions,€enhancement€factor€(7)€is€only€applicable€to€the€four€rape€convictions,Ïand€enhancement€factor€(15)€is€applicable€to€all€eight€convictions.ÌÌà ` àWith€respect€to€mitigation,€Defendant€merely€mentions€that€a€few€mitigatingÏfactors€should€have€been€applied€which€include€no€prior€criminal€record,€hisÏemployment€record,€his€limited€education,€and€his€financial€assistance€to€his€family.€ÏThe€pre„sentence€report€reveals€that€a€search€was€conducted€for€prior€criminalÐ Ð9p02 Ðoffenses€in€Greene€County€and€none€were€found.€€We€find€the€absence€of€a€criminalÏrecord€to€be€applicable€in€mitigation,€although€little€weight€should€be€afforded€it.€€ThisÏCourt€has€also€held€that€where€Defendant€was€convicted€of€sex€offenses€involvingÏminors,€favorable€consideration€based€upon€his€family€contributions€and€work€ethicÏwas€not€appropriate.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€McKnightóó,€900€S.W.2d€36€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð  À Ð1994),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1995).€€Further,€we€find€no€evidence€in€theÐ °  Ðrecord€as€to€how€his€limited€education€affected€his€actions€against€his€stepdaughterÏin€this€case,€so€this€factor€will€not€be€applied.€€ÌÌà ` àIn€summary,€we€believe€one€mitigating€factor,€Defendant's€lack€of€a€priorÏcriminal€record,€should€be€considered€relative€to€the€length€of€the€sentencesÏimposed.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€€40-35-113(13).€€However,€although€this€factorÐ °P Ðshould€be€considered,€we€do€not€believe€it€is€entitled€to€significant€weight€in€theÏcontext€of€this€case.€ÌÌà ` àEven€though€the€trial€court€inappropriately€applied€one€enhancement€factor€asÏto€the€aggravated€sexual€battery€convictions€and€one€enhancement€factor€as€to€allÏconvictions€and€failed€to€apply€one€mitigating€factor,€we€find€that€the€proof€supportsÏa€€twelve€(12)€year€sentence€for€each€aggravated€sexual€battery€conviction€and€aÏtwenty„five€(25)€year€sentence€for€each€aggravated€rape€and€rape€of€a€childÏconviction.€€Defendant€is€not€entitled€to€a€reduction€in€sentence€merely€because€weÏconclude€on€appeal€that€the€trial€court€incorrectly€applied€sentencing€and€mitigatingÏfactors.€òòState€v.€Hayesóó,€899€S.W.2d€175€S.W.2d€175,€€186-87€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),Ð 4 *, Ðòòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1995).€€Ð ð5,. ÐÌÐ Ð9p02 МñóññòñÐ  `  Ðñòññóñ›à ` àIn€òòHayesóó,€a€panel€of€this€Court€stated€the€following:€Ð `  ÐÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à[E]ven€if€we€determine€that€fewer€factors€should€apply€thanÏused€by€the€trial€court,€this€does€not€mean€that€the€lengthÏof€the€sentence€is€automatically€reduced.€That€is,€if€theÏsame€degree€of€culpability€and€negative€circumstancesÏrelate€to€the€remaining€applicable€factors,€the€originalÏenhancement€may€still€be€appropriate.€Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÓEÞÓÌòòIdóó.€€Such€is€the€case€here.€The€defendant€was€charged€with€the€care€and€control€ofÐ °  Ðthe€victim,€yet€he€abused€that€position€of€trust.€€We€find€the€length€of€the€sentencesÏimposed€by€the€trial€court€to€be€appropriate.ÌòòÌB.€Consecutive€Sentencesóó€Ð Ðp Ðà ` àNext,€the€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erroneously€imposedÏconsecutive€sentences.€€In€imposing€consecutive€sentences€to€the€aggravated€rapeÏand€rape€of€a€child€convictions,€the€court€stated€the€following:ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àThe€defendant€qualifies€for€consecutive€sentencing€underÏTennessee€Code€Annotated€[section]€40„35„115€whichÏwas€in€effect€when€all€of€these€offenses€are€charged,€andÏit€says€this,€that€the€defendant€can€be€sentenced€toÏconsecutive€sentences€for€convictions€if€the€defendant€isÏconvicted€of€two€or€more,€and€here€itððs€eight€statutoryÏoffenses€involving€sexual€abuse€of€a€minor,€withÏconsideration€of€the€aggravating€circumstances€arisingÏfrom€the€relationship€between€the€defendant€and€victim€orÏvictims€since€she€was€five,€time€span€of€defendantððsÏundetected€sexual€activity,€the€nature€and€scope€of€theÏsexual€acts€pervasive€and€extent€of€residual,€physical€andÏmental€damage€to€the€victim€which€seems€significant.€€InÏaddition€to€that€the€child€rape€statue€now€would€bolsterÏthat.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à.€.€.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àThe€right€thing€for€the€right€reasons€seems€to€me€to€beÏthis,€that€œñññtñññhis›€defendant,€for€the€things€that€heððs€done€toÏthis€child€over€a€long€period€of€time,€should€not€be€in€aÏposition€to€be€released€from€custody.€€Thatððs€harsh,€thatððsÏhard€for€me,€but€I€think€itððs€the€truth€.€.€.€.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÓ÷áÓÐ Ø8x/1 Ðà ` àIn€this€case,€Defendant€was€convicted€of€a€total€of€eight€offenses€involvingÏsexual€abuse€of€his€stepdaughter.€Defendant's€conduct€occurred€over€a€long€periodÏof€time€and€the€nature€and€scope€of€the€defendant's€sexual€acts€were€extensive.ÏAlthough€we€did€not€find€there€to€be€ð ðparticularly€greatðð€injury€to€the€victim,€weÏcertainly€believe€that€there€was€enough€physical€and€emotional€damage€to€justify€theÏapplication€of€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(b)(5).€€However,€a€finding€of€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(5)€does€not€end€our€inquiry€into€the€validity€of€consecutiveÏsentencing.€€Instead,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115€requires€further€review€ofÏwhether€consecutive€sentences€are€necessary€to€protect€the€public€from€theÏdefendantððs€possible€future€criminal€conduct€and€whether€the€aggregate€sentenceÏis€reasonably€related€to€the€severity€of€the€defendantððs€present€offenses.€€SentencingÏCommission€Comments,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115;€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(c)(1);Ð °P Ðòòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòState€v.€Wilkersonóó,€905€S.W.2d€933€(Tenn.€1995).€€From€our€òòdeóó€òònovoóóÐ   @ Ðreview€of€the€record,€we€conclude€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€imposingÏconsecutive€sentences.€€The€trial€court€found€that€the€confinement€was€necessaryÏto€protect€the€public€and€the€victim€from€future€criminal€conduct€of€Defendant.€ÏFurthermore,€because€the€progressive€egregious€nature€of€Defendantððs€eightÏconvictions€occurred€over€a€significant€span€of€time€with€his€own€stepdaughter,€theÏconsecutive€sentences€are€reasonably€related€to€the€severity€of€the€crimes.€ÏDefendant€has€failed€to€carry€his€burden€to€show€that€the€trial€courtððs€sentence€wasÏimproper.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.€€ÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓòòConclusionÐ à7€.0 ÐóóÐ Ð9p02 ÐÓüíÓà ` àThe€judgment€of€Count€Four€is€modified€to€reflect€a€conviction€of€aggravatedÏrape€rather€than€rape€of€a€child.€€In€all€other€aspects,€the€judgments€are€affirmed.Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àÌÌÓÓà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à____________________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JudgeÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌGARY€R.€WADE,€Presiding€JudgeÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌDAVID€H.€WELLES,€Judgeà0 À àаPÀ€%À€% Ð