ÿWPCd" V# ÄU:Ï %  0 (w@74w‹š¢ 0Pª 0Jú 0TD 0”˜ 0D, 0^p 0hÎ 0r6 0|¨ 0†$ 0ª 1u: 0d¯ U. 0@A B) DCª AMí B: îW U>EƒÒ” fqê‰ Assòev~õvÓs AQF Æ— 0D]! 0D¡! D/å! B" D31"˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLHÎ,c½¬AZ‹"Arial RegularX($¡¡ ‘’“[”•–+—+˜+™€ešÓ€äzz!3|x¥((3/Q$««Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÔ d Ô2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô(D(2´¤$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ%ä2¼A`ArialTT("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò% Line 7 d((((7Border 1ddN')Cþÿ << Gÿÿ d äÝ ƒ!ÝÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒO"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€XÔÌÌò òJune€25,€1997ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$ÝÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓ  Óà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝIt€is€the€policy€of€this€Court€not€to€identify€the€minor€victims€of€sexual€abuse.€Ì ÈÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$ÝÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓ  Óà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€trial€court€required€the€state€to€provide€more€information€to€the€defendantÏabout€the€specifics€of€the€acts€alleged.€The€state€apparently€wrote€a€letter€to€theÏdefendantððs€attorney.€The€letter€is€not€included€in€the€record,€but€references€are€madeÏto€it€in€the€record.Ì Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$ÝÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓ  Óà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€defendant€is€most€likely€referring€to€victim€ð ðCðð€in€òòSheltonóó.Ì Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$ÝÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓ  Óà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThis€letter€is€not€included€in€the€record.€€The€defendant€agrees€he€received€thisÏletter.Ì àÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$ÝÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓ  Óà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€supreme€court€was€critical€of€this€approach:€ð ðThe€disturbing€factor€in€thisÏlawsuit€is€that€the€State€precipitated€this€problem€by€declining€to€call€an€availableÏwitness€and€then€attempting€to€piggy„back€her€testimony€into€the€record€through€twoÏlisteners.ðð€òòJonesóó,€598€S.W.2d€at€223.Ì'yúÿ  <<= 8ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ iÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$ÝÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓ  Óà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€record€indicates€that€no€instruction€was€given€when€the€tapes€were€playedÏfor€the€jury.€€The€instructions€given€at€the€conclusion€of€the€proof€were€not€included€inÏthe€record.€Ì †Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$ÝÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓ  Óà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€òòJonesóó€court€concluded€that€the€confrontation€issue€did€not€arise€becauseÏthe€full€opportunity€was€given€and€used€to€cross„examine€the€witnesses€who€testifiedÏto€the€statements€made€by€the€defendant.€ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒNO'PQCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óRR'÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd++++'ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÝ  Ý›Ò  ÒÒ ° ÒÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ќـNÙÓ  ÓÑ\R AØ'\ÑßR€*,)A1-j|` Å `€€@ÿRß›Þ ÞÌIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌAT€JACKSONÌÌSEPTEMBER€1996€SESSIONÌÌÌÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à àNo.€02„C„01„9604„CC„00117Ìà àAppellee,à àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à àFayette€CountyÌv.à àà àà àà àà à)à àà àÌà àà àà àà àà à)à àJon€Kerry€Blackwood,€JudgeÌROY€DON€GIBSON,à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à à(Rape€of€a€Child)Ìà àAppellant.à àà àà à)ÌÌÌÌÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à àà àà àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:ÌÌJ.€Thomas€Caldwellà àà àà àJohn€Knox€WalkupÌAttorney€at€Law€€€€€à àà àà àà àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÌ114€Jefferson€Streetà àà àà à500€Charlotte€AvenueÌRipley,€TN€€38063à àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€€37243„0497ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àDeborah€A.€TullisÌà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌà àà àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àElizabeth€T.€RiceÌà àà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà à302€Market€StreetÌà àà àà àà àà àà àSomerville,€TN€€38068ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àChristopher€S.€MarshburnÌà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà à302€Market€StreetÌà àà àà àà àà àà àSomerville,€TN€€38068ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àJames€W.€Freeland,€Jr.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà à302€Market€StreetÌà àà àà àà àà àà àSomerville,€TN€€38068ÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€____________________________ÌÌÌCONVICTIONS€AFFIRMED,€REMANDED€FOR€RESENTENCINGÌÌÌJoe€B.€Jones,€Presiding€JudgeÌÌÇÓÓò òÓ  ÓÑ7€ÚÄXXdæXXdæ7ÑÔ€¼ÔO€P€I€N€I€O€NÔ€XÔÔ€-Ôó óÌÌÓ  Óà àÔ€ÔThe€appellant,€Roy€Don€Gibson€(defendant),€was€convicted€of€four€counts€ofÏrape€of€a€child,€a€Class€A€felony,€by€a€jury€of€his€peers.€The€trial€court,€finding€theÏdefendant€was€a€standard€offender,€imposed€a€Range€I€sentence€consisting€ofÏconfinement€for€twenty„one€(21)€years€in€the€Department€of€Correction€for€eachÏoffense.€He€was€also€fined€$25,000€for€one€conviction€involving€penile€penetration.€ÏThe€trial€court€ordered€that€the€sentences€are€to€be€served€concurrently.€The€judgeððsÏsentencing€order€stated€Gibson€will€serve€30€percent€of€his€term€before€he€is€eligibleÏfor€release€classification.Ìà àGibson€presents€six€issues€for€review.€Gibson€contends€the€evidence€isÏinsufficient,€as€a€matter€of€law,€to€support€the€convictions€for€rape€of€a€child.€He€alsoÏcontends€the€court€erred€by€(a)€failing€to€require€the€state€to€file€a€bill€of€particulars;€(b)Ïfailing€to€compel€a€physical€and€psychiatric€examination€of€the€victim;€(c)€failing€toÏallow€him€to€review€Department€of€Human€Services€records€pertaining€to€the€victim;€(d)Ïallowing€into€evidence€and€playing€for€the€jury€two€audio€tapes€containingÏincriminating€conversations€between€the€defendant€and€his€ex„wife;€and€(e)€allowingÏthe€child„victim€to€testify€while€holding€a€teddy€bear.Ìà àThe€state€also€raises€an€issue€on€appeal.€The€state€contends€the€court€erredÏwhen€it€ordered€that€Gibson€would€be€eligible€for€release€after€serving€30€percent€ofÏhis€21„year€sentence.€Gibson€was€convicted€of€four€counts€of€child€rape,€a€statuteÏwhich€went€into€effect€July€1,€1992.€€Prior€to€the€enactment€of€the€new€statute,€the€sameÏoffense€was€prohibited€under€the€aggravated€rape€statute.€Under€the€child€rape€statuteÍa€defendant€serves€100€percent€of€his€sentence.€€From€the€evidence€presented€at€trial,Ïonly€one€of€his€four€convictions€could€have€occurred€prior€to€the€effective€date€of€theÏchild€rape€statute.€€The€record€establishes€three€offenses€occurred€after€the€effectiveÏdate.€The€state€agrees€the€defendant€was€properly€sentenced€at€30€percent€for€oneÏcount.€€However,€for€the€remaining€three€convictions,€Gibson€should€be€required€toÏserve€100€percent€of€his€sentence.Ìà àThis€Court€remands€the€case€for€resentencing;€otherwise,€the€judgment€isÏaffirmed.€ÌÌà àThe€defendant€was€a€teacher€and€coach.€His€work€history€was€sporadic.€HisÏtenure€at€a€school€usually€lasted€only€a€year€or€two€and€he€moved€on.€He€also€workedÏnon„teaching€jobs€in€between€the€school€year.€The€defendant€first€befriended€BrendaÏWilbanks€in€1988€while€the€two€were€working€at€a€truck€stop€in€West€Memphis,ÏArkansas.€€The€relationship€progressed€and€eventually€Brenda€Wilbanks€and€her€twoÏyoung€daughters,€Elizabeth€Wilbanks€and€D.W.× ƒ. ××  ×€€moved€in€with€the€defendant€andÏlived€together€as€a€family.€€The€defendant€returned€to€coaching€and€teaching€in€1989Ïand€took€a€job€at€a€school€in€Tipton€County.€The€defendant€and€Brenda€Wilbanks€wereÏmarried€in€July€1990.€The€next€year€in€August€1991,€the€defendant€took€a€job€teachingÏand€coaching€at€Rossville€Academy€and€the€group€moved€to€a€double„wide€trailer€inÏFayette€County.€€The€coupleððs€relationship€was€tumultuous€at€best.€€A€daughter€wasÏborn€of€his€union€on€November€19,€1992.€In€October€1993€the€two€were€divorced.€ÏThey€reunited€in€March€1994€and€Brenda€Gibsonððs€two€girls€went€to€live€with€theirÍbiological€father.€€The€defendant€and€Brenda€Gibson€lived€together€with€their€daughterÏuntil€June€7,€1994.€€The€investigation€into€the€allegations€of€sexual€abuse€began€aÏshort„time€thereafter.Ì€€ÌÓ  Óà àò òSUFFICIENCY€OF€THE€EVIDENCEó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àGibson€contends€the€state€failed€to€prove€that€the€child€victim€was€penetratedÏvaginally€by€the€defendant€(Count€2),€she€engaged€in€fellatio€with€the€defendantÏ(Count€3)€and€she€was€digitally€penetrated€by€the€defendant€(Counts€6€and€7).ÌÌò òÓ  ÓA.ó óà àÌÌÓ  Óà àWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€convicting€evidence,€thisÏCourt€must€review€the€record€to€determine€if€the€evidence€adduced€during€the€trial€wasÏsufficient€ð ðto€support€the€finding€by€the€trier€of€fact€of€guilt€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.ððÏTenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(e).€This€rule€is€applicable€to€findings€of€guilt€predicated€upon€directÏevidence,€circumstantial€evidence,€or€a€combination€of€direct€and€circumstantialÏevidence.€òòState€v.€Matthewsóó,€805€S.W.2d€776,€779€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.Ïòòdeniedóó(Tenn.€1990).€Ìà àIn€determining€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€this€Court€does€not€reweigh€orÏreevaluate€the€evidence.€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.€1978).€€NorÏmay€this€Court€substitute€its€inferences€for€those€drawn€by€the€trier€of€fact€fromÏcircumstantial€evidence.€òòLiakas€v.€Stateóó,€199€Tenn.€298,€305€286€S.W.2d€856,€859Í(1956).€To€the€contrary,€this€Court€is€required€€to€afford€the€State€of€Tennessee€theÏstrongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€contained€in€the€record€as€well€as€allÏreasonable€and€legitimate€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€from€the€evidence.€€òòState€v.ÏHerrodóó,€754€S.W.2d€627,€632€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1988).€Ìà àQuestions€concerning€the€credibility€of€the€witnesses,€the€weight€and€value€toÏbe€given€the€evidence€as€well€as€all€factual€issues€raised€by€the€evidence€are€resolvedÏby€the€trier€of€fact,€not€this€Court.€€òòState€v.€Pappasóó,€754€S.W.2d€620,€623€(Tenn.€Crim.ÏApp.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1987).€€In€òòState€v.€Graceóó,€493€S.W.2d€474,€476€(Tenn.Ï1973),€the€Supreme€Court€said,€ð ðA€guilty€verdict€by€the€jury,€approved€by€the€trialÏjudge,€accredits€the€testimony€of€the€witnesses€for€the€State€and€resolves€all€conflictsÏin€favor€of€the€theory€of€the€State.ððÌà àSince€a€verdict€of€guilt€removes€the€presumption€of€innocence,€òòGraceóó,€493ÏS.W.2d€at€476,€the€accused€has€the€burden€in€this€Court€of€illustrating€why€theÏevidence€is€insufficient€to€support€the€verdict€returned€by€the€trier€of€fact.€€òòState€v.ÏTuggleóó,€639€S.W.2d€913,€914€(Tenn.€1982).€€This€Court€will€not€disturb€a€verdict€of€guiltÏdue€to€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€unless€the€facts€contained€in€the€record€and€theÏinferences€which€may€be€drawn€from€the€facts€are€sufficient,€as€a€matter€of€law,€for€aÏrational€trier€of€fact€to€find€the€accused€guilty€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòMatthewsóó,Ï805€S.W.2d€at€780.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓB.ó óà àÌÓ  Óà àÌà àThe€indictment€originally€charged€the€defendant€with€aggravated€rape€pursuantÍto€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„502.€€The€original€indictment€is€not€included€in€the€record.€ÏA€superseding€indictment€was€returned€charging€child€rape€pursuant€to€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€39„13„522.€€The€state€was€permitted€to€amend€the€new€indictment€before€theÏtrial€commenced.€€The€amendment€related€to€the€time€the€offense€occurred.Ìà àD.W.€provided€no€date€as€to€when€the€incident€for€Count€2€occurred€other€than€itÏoccurred€while€the€family€was€living€in€a€double„wide€trailer€in€Fayette€County.€€TheÏrecord€establishes€the€offenses€occurred€after€the€family€moved€into€the€trailer€inÏAugust€1991.€Therefore,€the€event€could€have€occurred€prior€to€the€July€1,€1992Ïeffective€date€of€the€child€rape€law.€ÌÌò òÓ  Ó(1)ó óÌÌÓ  Óà àThe€defendant€argues€€ð ðthe€proof€wholly€failed€to€show€an€offense€committedÏwhile€the€Child€Rape€Statute€was€the€Law€of€the€Laws.ððÌ€à àAggravated€rape,€the€initial€offense€charged,€is€ð ðunlawful€sexual€penetration€byÏthe€defendant€or€the€defendant€by€a€victim€accompanied€by€any€of€the€followingÏcircumstances:ðð€.€.€.€.€€(4)€The€victim€is€less€than€thirteen€(13)€years€of€age.ðð€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€39„13„502.€€Aggravated€rape€is€a€class€A€felony.€€The€offense€of€rape€of€a€childÏis€ð ðthe€unlawful€sexual€penetration€of€a€victim€by€the€defendant€or€the€defendant€by€aÏvictim,€if€such€victim€is€less€than€(13)€years€of€age.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„522.€ÏRape€of€a€child€is€a€class€A€felony.€€Ìà àSexual€penetration€means€ð ðsexual€intercourse€.€.€.€however€slight.ðð€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€39„13„501(7).Ìà àThe€only€difference€between€the€two€crimes€is€the€nature€of€the€sentenceÏimposed.€Under€the€child€rape€statute,€offenders€are€required€to€serve€every€day€ofÏtheir€sentence.€Under€aggravated€rape,€offenders€can€qualify€to€serve€a€percentage€ofÏthe€sentence.Ìà àSexual€penetration€with€a€child€under€the€age€of€thirteen€was€prohibited€by€€lawÏduring€the€entire€time€in€question.€€The€defendantððs€argument€as€to€this€subissue€isÏwithout€merit.Ìò òÓ  Ó(2)ó óÌÌÓ  Óà àGibson€also€argues€that€he€cannot€be€convicted€of€raping€a€child€because€theÏstate€failed€to€prove€penile€penetration€in€Count€2.€€He€argues€there€was€no€evidenceÏof€injury€or€penetration;€and€D.W.€did€not€complain€that€she€was€penetrated.€Ìà àThe€child„victim€testified€that€while€she,€her€sister,€and€mother€were€living€in€aÏdouble„wide€trailer€the€defendant€raped€her.€€D.W.€testified€the€act€occurred€in€ð ðRoyððsÏroom.ðð€€She€and€the€defendant€were€the€only€ones€home€at€the€time.€€The€girl€testified:Ïð ðHe€put€his€hand€on€my€private€and€then€he€put€his€private€on€mine,€and€it€went€in€aÏlittle€bit,€and€white€stuff€came€out€and€it€got€on€me,€and€I€wiped€it€off.ðð€€During€the€act€theÏdefendant€asked€her€to€say,€ð ðF„„„€m„.ðð€€She€refused.€€ð ðRoy€told€me€if€I€told€anybody€thatÏthey€would€be€mad€at€me.ððÌà àThe€defendant€met€with€his€ex„wife,€Brenda€Gibson,€on€two€occasions.€€She,Ïalong€with€a€Tennessee€Bureau€of€Investigation€agent,€secretly€recorded€theseÏconversations.€€The€tapes€were€played€for€the€jury.€€During€the€conversations,€€GibsonÏadmitted€touching€his€penis€to€the€childððs€genitals.€The€first€tape€recording€was€madeÍJuly€10,€1994€at€Panchoððs€in€West€Memphis,€Arkansas:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:€à0 àI€didnððt€touch€her€[that€much].€It€was€just€herÏhand€touching€me€down€there.€Thatððs€aboutÏthe€main€thing.€Thatððs€all€it€was.€Very€few€timesÏdid€my€thing€touch€her.€Very€few€times.€Ìà8 àà8 àBrenda€Gibson:€à0 àWhat€did€you€just€say?Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:€à0 àYou€know€what€I€said.€My€dick€did€not€touchÏher€down€there€but€maybe€ten€times€in€howÏmany€years€„€three€or€four€years€„€thatððs€all€„„Ïjust€touched€her€„„€thatððs€all....ÌÌÓ  Óà0 à*€*€*€*€ÌÌÓ  Óà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:€à0 àI€didnððt€touch€her€more€than€10€times€with€thatÏdown€there.€The€whole€time.€.€.€.Ìà8 àà8 àBrenda€Gibson:à0 àWith€what?Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àDick,€Brenda,€dick,€dick.€(Unintelligible).ÏShe€didnððt€like€that€Brenda.€Did€she€tellÏyou€that?Ìà8 àà8 àBrenda€Gibson:à0 àYes,€she€told€me€she€didnððt€like€it.Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:€à0 àIt€was€very€seldom.€Ìà8 àà8 àBrenda€Gibson:€à àShe€also€told€me€it€hurt€her.€Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àOnce€or€twice.€It€wouldnððt€fit€in€her,Ïthough€I€can€guarantee€you€that.ÏThereððs€no€way.€She€was€little€then.€ÌÌÓ  Óà0 à*€*€*€*ÌÌÓ  Óà8 àà8 àBrenda€Gibson:à0 àWhat€you€are€telling€me€is€you€touchedÏyour€penis€to€her€vagina.Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àJust€touched€it.€Just€touched€it.€It€neverÏwent€in.€It€couldnððt€go€in.€My€fingerÏcouldnððt€even€go€in.Ìà8 àà8 àBrenda€Gibson:€à0 àBut€you€attempted,€you€tried.Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àI€did€not€try.€It€would€hurt€her€Brenda.€IÏhave€a€lot€more€sense€than€that.€ItÏwould€hurt€her.€My€God€it€would€hurtÏyou.€No,€I€did€not€do€that.€No,€I€did€notÏtry€to€do€that.€I€just€touched,€is€thatÏenough?€It€was€mostly€jacking€off,€thatððsÏall.€(Unintelligible).ÌÓÓÌHe€also€confirmed€he€told€the€victim€if€she€told€anyone€what€was€occurring,€ð ðweððd€allÏget€in€trouble.ðð€€He€also€confirmed€he€asked€her€to€say€ð ðF„„„€m„ðð€when€he€wasÏcommitting€the€act.€Ìà àIn€a€second€conversation€recorded€July€18,€1994€at€Mazzioððs€Pizza€in€Memphis,Ïthe€defendant€again€admitted€to€the€act:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àI€never€went€inside€her,€with€my€fingerÏor€anything,€and€Iððll€take€a€test€to€that.Ìà8 àà8 àBrenda€Gibson:à0 àRoy,€thatððs€not€what€you€told€me€lastÏtime.Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àNo€itððs€not.€I€never€did.€I€canððt,€Iððm€tooÏfuckinðð€big,€how€could€I€do€that?€€Ìà8 àà8 àBrenda€Gibson:à0 àYou€attempted€to€Roy.Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àI€touched€her,€you€know€that€thingððsÏkinda€big,€it€probably€felt€bad€to€her.€IððmÏsorry,€if€she€said€it€hurt,€I€did€not€getÏnear€her.Ìà8 àà8 àBrenda€Gibson:à0 àRoy,€how€can€you€say€you€didnððt€getÏnear€her€when€you€just€said€.€.€.Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àAfter€she€said€it€hurt,€Brenda,€I€got€awayÏfrom€her.€Any€time.€ÌÌÓ  Óà0 à*€*€*€*ÌÌÓ  Óà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àI€did€not€try€to€rape€her,€how€couldÏanybody€say€that?€Thatððs€a€damn€lie.€IÏtouched€her€with€it,€and€thatððs€all€I€did.ÏShe€was€too€little,€sheððs€a€baby,€I€canððtÏdo€it,€thereððs€no€way€I€could€do€it.€YouÏought€to€know€that.€Any€time€she€saidÏanything€hurt€I€stopped.€Any€time.€€Ìà0 àÌÌÓÓà àDr.€Alan€Battle,€a€clinical€psychologist€who€briefly€treated€the€defendant,€saidÏthe€defendant€reported€about€20€instances€of€sexual€contact€with€the€victim€over€aÏthree€to€four€year€period.€The€defendant€told€the€doctor€no€penile€penetration€hadÏoccurred.Ìà àJo€Jones,€a€nurse€evaluator€from€Memphis€Sexual€Assault€Center,€testified€thatÏalthough€the€results€of€the€victimððs€exam€were€normal€and€her€hymen€was€intact,€aÏpenis€could€have€been€inserted€between€the€victimððs€labia€and€not€break€the€hymen.Ïà àSexual€penetration€is€sexual€intercourse€ð ðhowever€slight.ðð€€The€victim€who€wasÏborn€June€9,€1983,€would€have€been€less€than€13€years€of€age€when€the€act€occurred.Ìà àThus,€the€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓC.ÌÓ  ÓÌà àó óThe€defendant€next€contends€the€evidence€was€insufficient€to€support€theÏconviction€for€rape€of€child€involving€fellatio.€The€amended€indictment€charges€childÏrape€by€oral€penetration€of€the€victimððs€mouth€by€penis€between€June€1,€1991€andÏJune€1994€€(Count€3).Ìà àThe€child„victim€testified€that€while€the€family€was€living€in€the€trailer€ð ðhe€madeÏme€put€[his€sexual€organ]€in€my€mouth.ðð€€She€stated€that€Jamie,€her€half„sisterÏ(daughter€of€Brenda€Gibson€and€the€defendant),€had€been€born€when€this€occurred.ÏJamie€Gibson€was€born€in€November€1992.€€The€child€rape€statute€would€have€been€inÏeffect.Ìà àDr.€Battle€testified€that€the€defendant€said€the€11„year„old€would€ð ðmasturbate€hisÏpenis€until€he€achieved€orgasm,€and€one€or€two€times,€perhaps,€she€had€sucked€theÏpenis,€but€she€didnððt€like€it.ððÌà àIn€the€first€recorded€conversation€between€the€defendant€and€his€ex„wife,ò ò€ó ótheÏdefendant€admitted€to€committing€fellatio:€ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:€à0 àShe€did€it€with€her€mouth€a€few€times,€not€veryÏmany,€because€she€didnððt€like€to€do€that.€IÏnever€forced€her€to€do€it.€I€never€forced€her€toÏdo€anything.ÌÌÓ  Ó*€*€*€*ÌÌÓ  Óà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:€à0 àShe€used€her€mouth€sometimes.Ï(Unintelligible)€Did€she€tell€you€that?Ìà8 àà8 àBrenda€Gibson:à0 àShe€told€me€she€didnððt€like€any€of€it.Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àWell€thatððs€not€„„€well€you€can€believeÏthat,€and€I€want€to€believe€it€too,€but€sheÏdidnððt€act€like€that€sometimes.€I€thinkÏshe€did€like€some€of€it€at€firstÏ(unintelligible).ÌÌÌDuring€the€conversation€on€July€18,€1994:ÌÌà8 àà8 àBrenda€Gibson:à0 àShe€tells€me€you€made€her€have€oralÏsex€with€you.Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àI€didnððt€have€to€make€her,€Brenda.€IÏknow€you€didnððt€want€to€understand€it,Ïbut€I€didnððt€have€to€make€her€do€it.€IÏknow€you€donððt€want€to€understand€thisÏpart,€but€some€things€she€actuallyÏenjoyed€because€sheððs€young€andÏdidnððt€know€what€she€was€doing.€ButÏyou€donððt€want€to€understand€that,ÏBrenda,€I€didnððt€have€to€make€her€doÏanything.Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àIf€I€asked€her€to€do€that€and€she€didnððtÏwant€to€do€it,€she€didnððt€do€it.€She€wasÏnever€forced€to€do€it.Ìà8 àà8 àBrenda€Gibson:à0 àTo€do€what?Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àOral€sex,€Brenda,€oral€sex!€(Shouting)ÏHow€many€times€do€you€gotta€hear€theÏfuckinðð€shit.€.€.€.€.€€If€she€did€it,€it€wasÏbecause€she€wanted€to.€It€wasnððt€everyÏtime,€it€wasnððt€all€the€time.Ìà8 àà8 àBrenda€Gibson:à0 àWell€how€many€times€was€it€in€the€truck,Ïcan€you€tell€me€that?Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àNo,€I€canððt€tell€you€that.€I€didnððt€take€aÏfuckinðð€log€book€in€the€truck€and€write€itÍdown.Ìà8 àà8 àBrenda€Gibson:à0 àI€am€sure€you€didnððt€Roy,€but€my€Lord.Ìà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àà0 àIt€wasnððt€very€many,€the€whole€thingÏwasnððt€that€many.€I€donððt€think€it€was€20Ïtimes€the€whole€time,€the€whole€yearÏthat€youððre€talking€about.€Hell,€like€youÏsay,€one€timeððs€enough.€Iððm€guilty.̀̀€Ìà àThis€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓD.Ìó óÌÌÓÓÓ  Óà àThe€defendant€next€contends€the€evidence€was€insufficient€to€support€theÏconviction€of€rape€of€a€child€by€digital€penetration.€This€act€was€to€have€occurredÏbetween€June€1991€and€June€1994€(Count€6).€€In€a€letter€to€the€defendantððs€attorney,Ïthe€state€claimed€this€act€occurred€June€9€or€10,€1994€at€a€house€in€Moscow,€FayetteÏCounty.× ƒ/ ××  ×Ìà àThe€child„victim€identified€a€photograph€of€a€house€in€which€her€family€lived€inÏMoscow€which€is€located€in€Fayette€County.€€Her€older€sister€told€jurors€the€family€hadÏlived€in€the€house€for€a€short€time€in€the€Summer€of€1994.€€The€child„victim€knew€herÏsister€Jamie,€born€in€November€1992,€€lived€there€as€well.€€The€child„victim€also€saidÏthe€act€occurred€around€the€time€of€her€June€9th€birthday.€€Ìà àWhile€at€this€house,€she€said€the€defendant€came€into€her€room.€€He€put€hisÏhands€in€her€pants.€ð ðHe€started€moving€around,€and€he€said€something,€but€I€donððtÏrecall€what€he€said.ðð€She€said€he€touched€her€ð ðprivateðð€with€his€hand.€€She€said€heÍtouched€both€the€inside€and€outside€part€of€her€ð ðprivates.ððÌà àDuring€the€July€10,€1994€recorded€conversation€the€defendant€told€his€ex„wifeÏthat€the€contact€with€her€daughter€was€usually€just€touching.€From€comments€madeÏabout€his€finger,€a€jury€could€find€that€he€attempted€to€penetrate€using€his€finger.€€€ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àRoy€Gibson:à0 àI€didnððt€touch€her€[that€much].€It€was€just€herÏhand€touching€me€down€there.€Thatððs€aboutÏthe€main€thing.€Thatððs€all€it€was.€ÌÌà àà àà0 àà0 àà0 à*€*€*€*€ÌÌà àà0 àà0 àà0 àMy€finger€couldnððt€even€go€in.ÌÓÓà àÌDr.€Battleððs€testimony€indicated€the€defendant€admitted€to€20€instances€of€sexualÏcontact€with€the€child.Ìà àIn€his€brief,€the€defendant€argues€that€he€testified€at€trial€D.W.€was€not€at€hisÏhouse€in€June€1994.€This€is€totally€unsupported€by€the€evidence.€His€own€testimonyÏindicates€the€girls€were€at€his€house€in€June€although€they€may€not€have€spent€theÏnight.€Ìà àThe€defendant€testified€he€reunited€with€Brenda€Gibson€in€March€1994,€afterÏtheir€divorce.€They€lived€together€until€June€7,€1994.€€He€said€the€two€girls€lived€at€hisÏhouse€for€three€days€in€March€until€they€moved€to€Mississippi€with€their€natural€father.€ÏHe€testified€he€saw€the€girls€in€June€1994.€ð ðI€went€down€there€[to€Mississippi]€with€herÏ[Brenda€Gibson]€to€get€them€on€June,€the€1st.ðð€€ð ðThey€came€back€to€our€house,€but€theyÏwent€over€to€their€auntððs€and€stayed€over€there.ðð€€ð ðI€donððt€think€they€stayed€one€night.€IÏdonððt€remember€them€staying€one€night.ðð€€He€said€D.W.€went€to€her€auntððs€house€inÏMemphis€for€a€birthday€party€on€June€11.€€During€that€whole€time€he€said,€ð ðI€never€sawÍthem€again€when€they€went€over€at€their€auntððs,€except€when€they€came€back€on€theÏnight€of€the€7th.ðð€Ìà àThe€child€victim€testified€the€act€of€digital€penetration€occurred€near€her€birthdayÏon€June€9.€€The€child€victim€clearly€identified€this€act€as€one€occurring€at€theÏdefendantððs€house.€€The€evidence€offered€by€the€defendant€shows€he€was€in€contactÏwith€the€child„victim€around€the€time€of€her€birthday€in€June€1994.€The€act€could€haveÏoccurred€without€the€child„victim€spending€the€night.€Ìà àThe€defendant€also€argues€the€testimony€from€nurse€evaluator€Jones€indicatedÏthere€was€no€penetration€because€Jonesððs€evaluation€showed€an€intact€hymen€and€noÏsign€of€penetration;€the€exam€of€D.W.€was€ð ðnormal.ðð€€The€defendant€fails€to€note€thatÏJones€also€said€€the€finding€of€ð ðnormalðð€did€not€mean€the€touching€did€not€occurÏbecause€the€defendant€could€have€used€a€finger€and€just€penetrated€between€theÏchildððs€labia.€€Jones€testified€the€last€instance€of€sexual€assault€was€reported€as€JuneÏ10,€1994.€€She€said€she€would€not€expect€to€find€evidence€of€bruising€after€twenty€daysÏhad€passed.€€The€defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€held€this€testimony€wasÏinsufficient.€€The€record€does€not€support€the€defendantððs€assertions.€Ìà àThe€defendant€further€argues€this€case€is€analogous€to€òòState€v.€Sheltonóó,€851ÏS.W.2d€134€(Tenn.€1993),€in€which€the€supreme€court€reversed€a€sexual€batteryÏconviction€when€the€proof€was€non„specific€and€the€medical€evidence€was€lacking.€ÏòòSheltonóó€is€distinguished€from€this€case.€The€victim€in€òòSheltonóó€did€not€testify× ƒ0 ××  ×€as€thisÏchild„victim€did.€€In€òòSheltonóó,€the€only€incriminating€evidence€indicating€abuse€of€theÏchild„victim€came€from€two€other€child„victims€who€gave€non„specific€testimony.€€This€isÍclearly€distinguishable€from€the€present€case€which€includes€specific€testimony€fromÏthe€child„victim€and€admissions€by€the€defendant.€Ìà àð ðSexual€penetrationðð€means€sexual€intercourse,€cunnilingus,€fellatio,€analÏintercourse,€or€òòany€other€intrusion,€however€slightóó,€of€any€part€of€a€personððs€body€or€ofÏany€object€into€the€genital€or€anal€openings€of€the€victimððs,€the€defendantððs,€or€anyÏother€personððs€body,€but€emission€of€semen€is€not€required;ðð€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„501(7).€A€€rational€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€that€digital€penetration€occurred.€Ìà àThis€issue€is€without€merit.€Ìò òÓ  ÓE.€à0 àó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àThe€defendant€next€contends€the€evidence€was€insufficient€to€support€theÏconviction€of€rape€of€a€child€by€digital€penetration.€€This€act€was€to€have€occurredÏbetween€June€1990€and€June€1994€(Count€7).Ìà àThe€child€victim€testified€this€incident€occurred€at€the€trailer.€€Jamie€had€beenÏborn€at€that€time€indicating€this€act€occurred€after€November€1992.€€She€said€everyoneÏwas€present€at€the€trailer€when€this€occurred.€€She€and€her€sister€were€in€the€room€theyÏshared.€She€told€jurors€she€was€sleeping€on€the€floor;€her€sister€was€in€her€bed€asleep.ÏThe€defendant€entered€the€room€and€ð ðput€his€finger€in€my€private.ððÌà àThe€defendant€argues€the€child€was€under€the€influence€of€her€mother€whomÏthe€defendant€claims€was€attempting€to€extort€money€from€the€defendant.€€TheÏdefendant€also€argues€the€child€was€an€accomplice€and€a€conviction€cannot€be€upheldÏon€the€victimððs€unsupported€testimony.ò òÌà àó óThere€is€nothing€in€the€record€to€support€the€defendantððs€claims€the€child€was€anÍaccomplice€except€for€his€own€feeble€suggestion€that€she€enjoyed€performing€some€ofÏthe€acts.€€This€issue€was€not€raised€during€the€trial€and€was€not€raised€in€the€motion€forÏnew€trial,€therefore,€it€is€waived.Ìà àThe€defendant€by€his€own€admission€acknowledges€touching€the€girl.€€€€à àÌà àThe€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓBILL€OF€PARTICULARS€ó óÌò òÓ  ÓÌà àó óThe€defendant€contends€the€trial€court€committed€error€of€prejudicial€dimensionÏby€failing€to€require€the€state€to€provide€the€defendant€with€a€bill€of€particulars.€€TheÏdefendant€argues€he€was€prejudiced€by€the€lack€of€specifics€in€the€indictment.€€HeÏfurther€argues€he€was€denied€access€to€witnesses€in€the€case€who€could€haveÏprovided€more€information.€€Finally,€he€argues€he€was€charged€with€an€offense€whichÏtook€place€prior€to€the€enactment€of€the€law€he€was€alleged€to€have€violated.ÌÌò òÓ  Ó(1)ó óÌ€ÌÓ  Óà àThe€defendant€asserts€that€having€a€bill€of€particulars€would€be€the€only€way€heÏcould€have€properly€investigated€the€charges€against€him.€€The€original€indictmentÏcharged€the€defendant€with€seven€counts€of€aggravated€rape€occurring€between€JuneÏ1990€and€June€1994.€€An€amended€indictment€charged€the€defendant€with€sevenÏcounts€of€child€rape€occurring€between€June€1991€and€June€1994.€€The€child€rapeÏstatute€went€into€effect€July€1,€1992.€€Thus,€the€defendant€argues€he€was€alleged€toÍhave€committed€an€act€before€it€was€made€illegal€pursuant€to€the€child€rape€statute.Ìà àTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€39„13„502€prohibiting€aggravated€rape€andÏTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„522€prohibiting€child€rape€proscribe€the€same€behavior€„„Ïthe€rape€of€a€victim€under€the€age€of€13.€€Both€are€Class€A€felonies.€€The€onlyÏdifference€between€the€two€statutes€is€the€sentences€imposed€following€a€conviction.€ÏIn€prosecutions€pursuant€to€the€aggravated€rape€statute,€the€defendant€becomesÏeligible€for€release€on€the€release€eligibility€date.€€In€prosecutions€pursuant€to€the€childÏrape€statute,€the€defendant€must€serve€100€percent€of€his€sentence.Ìà àThe€defendant€was€not€prejudiced€by€the€fact€that€the€time€period€indicated€inÏthe€indictment€covered€a€period€before€the€enactment€of€the€child€rape€law.€€The€actionÏwas€still€prohibited€under€the€aggravated€rape€statute€which€was€the€original€indictedÏcharge.€The€defendant€had€adequate€notice€of€the€allegation.€€The€state€agrees€one€ofÏthe€convictions€occurred€before€the€effective€date€of€the€child€rape€statute.ÌÌÓ  Óà àò ò(2)Ìó óÌÓ  Óà àThe€defendant€argues€he€was€not€allowed€to€speak€with€the€child€victim€orÏBrenda€Gibson,€the€childððs€mother;€nor€was€he€given€statements€made€by€these€twoÏwitnesses.Ìà àà àà àThe€defendant€filed€a€motion€seeking€any€statements€made€by€the€victim€onÏApril€12,€1995€but€he€did€not€file€a€motion€seeking€access€to€or€interviews€with€theÏvictim,€her€sister,€or€their€mother.€€The€record€is€devoid€of€any€evidence€thatÏdemonstrates€the€defendant€was€denied€access€to€the€witnesses.€He€has€notÍdemonstrated€how€he€was€prejudiced€by€lack€of€access.€Ìà àFurthermore,€the€legal€custodian€for€a€minor€child„victim€has€an€absolute€right€toÏrefuse€a€defense€attorneyððs€request€for€an€interview.€òòState€v.€Michael€Scott€Baroneóó,ÏDavidson€County€No.€01C01„9008„CR„00196€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€Nashville,€October€2,Ï1991),€òòrevððdóó€òòinóó€òòpartóó€òòonóó€òòotheróó€òògroundsóó,€852€S.W.2d€216€(Tenn.€1993);€òòState€v.€JamesÏDisonóó,€Sevier€County€No.€03„C01„9602„CC„00051€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,ÏJanuary€31,€1997).€€€à àÌà àThis€subissue€is€without€merit.Ìò òÓ  ÓÇ(3)Ìó óà àÌÓ  Óà à€The€defendant€filed€a€motion€for€bill€of€particulars€on€April€12,€1995.€€TheÏdefendant€contends€the€court€erred€by€not€requiring€the€state€to€file€a€bill€of€particulars.ÏThe€trial€court€considered€the€motion€on€April€26,€1995.Ìà àThe€trial€judge€decided€to€reserve€ruling€on€the€issue.€€Instead,€he€decided€toÏwait€and€see€what€material€the€state€provided€the€defendant€in€discovery€and€if€he€wasÏprovided€enough€information€to€prepare€a€defense.€€The€court€said€in€ruling:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àIn€this€discovery€that€Mr.€Caldwell€is€going€to€be€allowed,€if€itÏdelineates€enough€of€the€particular€acts€in€the€charge€forÏhim€to€prepare€a€defense,€then€the€Court€will€deny€the€bill€ofÏparticulars;€but€if€it€doesnððt€do€that,€then€the€Court€thinks€thatÏa€bill€of€particulars,€specifying€as€best€what€the€StateÏintends€to€prove€on€each€of€these€particular€elements,Ïshould€be€required.ÌÌÌÓÓà àDefense€counsel€filed€a€motion€to€dismiss€the€prosecution€on€May€30,€1995Ïafter€the€state€failed€to€disclose€particulars€of€the€charges€as€ordered€by€the€trial€court.ÏThe€state€apparently€sent€defense€counsel€a€letter€dated€June€2,€1995.× ƒ1 ××  ×€€The€stateÏprovided€more€specifics€regarding€the€offenses€and€stated€some€of€the€offenses€tookÏplace€at€the€defendantððs€trailer€in€Fayette€County.€€The€defendant€argues€the€letterÏlimited€the€offenses€to€June€1991.€€However,€the€quoted€portion€of€the€letter€in€theÏdefendantððs€motion€to€strike€merely€indicates€the€defendant€took€a€teaching€job€in€JuneÏ1991€and€moved€to€a€trailer€at€that€time.€€The€quoted€material€does€not€indicate€theÍoffense€occurred€in€June€1991.€€The€indictment€provided€the€time€period€for€theÏoffense€was€June€1990€and€June€1994.€Ìà à€The€letter€also€stated€that€in€March€1994€Brenda€Gibson€moved€in€with€theÏdefendant€in€a€house€in€Moscow.€€The€letter€stated€the€defendant€fondled€the€child„victimððs€vagina€with€his€hands€at€this€house.€€This€occurred,€according€to€the€state,€atÏthe€time€of€the€childððs€eleventh€birthday.€Ìà àIn€the€defendantððs€motion€to€strike,€he€argued€that€except€for€two€specificÏcharges€all€others€should€be€stricken.€€It€should€be€noted,€the€defendant€failed€to€makeÏthe€letter€a€part€of€record.€€He€merely€relies€on€his€own€recitation€of€certain€parts€of€theÏstateððs€letter€for€his€argument.Ìà àDuring€the€hearing€on€the€motion€for€a€€bill€of€particulars,€the€defendant€hadÏreceived€two€audio€tapes€containing€the€defendantððs€admissions€to€penile„vaginalÏpenetration,€fellatio,€and€digital€penetration€of€the€victim.€€The€defendant€also€had€aÏtwo„page€report€prepared€by€Dr.€Alan€Battle,€a€clinical€psychologist,€who€would€testifyÏabout€the€defendantððs€statements.€€The€report€indicated€that€the€defendant€hadÏadmitted€to€sexual€contact€with€the€child„victim.€€The€defendant€also€had€the€indictmentÏwhich€detailed€seven€allegations€of€sexual€penetration€between€June€1990€and€JuneÏ1994.€Ìà àThe€well„established€law€in€Tennessee€does€not€require€an€exact€date€or€yearÏof€an€offense€unless€the€date€ð ðis€a€material€ingredient€in€the€offense.ðð€€òòState€v.€Byrdóó,Ï820€S.W.2d€739,€740€(Tenn.€1991).€€The€state€only€needs€to€allege€the€offense€wasÏcommitted€prior€to€filing€of€the€indictment.€€òòByrdóó,€820€S.W.2d€at€740.Ìà àThe€Constitutions€of€Tennessee€and€the€United€States€provide€that€criminalÍdefendants€have€a€right€to€know€the€nature€of€the€crime€charged.€€An€indictment€mustÏprovide€notice€of€the€offense€to€the€defendant,€provide€the€court€with€adequate€groundÏupon€which€to€enter€a€proper€judgment,€and€provide€protection€against€doubleÏjeopardy.€òòByrdóó,€820€S.W.2d€at€741.Ìà àThe€purpose€of€the€bill€of€particulars€is€to€provide€the€accused€with€sufficientÏinformation€about€the€offense€alleged€in€the€indictment€to€permit€the€accused€(a)€toÏprepare€a€defense€to€the€offense,€(b)€to€avoid€prejudicial€surprise€at€trial,€and€(c)€toÏenable€the€accused€to€preserve€a€plea€of€double€jeopardy.€òòByrdóó,€820€S.W.2d€at€€741;ÏòòState€v.€Campbellóó,€904€S.W.2d€608,€611€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995);€òòState€v.€Perkinsonóó,Ï867€S.W.2d€1,€5€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1992),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1993).€€In€òòState€v.ÏByrdóó,€the€supreme€court€recognized€that€in€most€child€sex€abuse€cases€the€state€isÏunable€to€offer€the€specific€date€when€an€alleged€offense€occurred.€€òòByrdóó,€820€S.W.2dÏat€741.€Nevertheless,€a€trial€court€should€require€the€state€to€furnish€what€information€itÏmay€have€in€its€possession€concerning€the€time€when€the€alleged€offense€wasÏcommitted.€€òòByrdóó,€820€S.W.2d€at€741;€òòseeóó€òòCampbellóó,€904€S.W.2d€at€611„12.€ÏDescriptive€information€can€narrow€the€time€frame€of€the€offense€alleged€in€theÏindictment.€€òòByrdóó,€820€S.W.2d€at€742.€When€the€state€lacks€information€to€narrow€theÏtime€frame€with€descriptive€references,€an€accusedððs€conviction€may€be€affirmed€if€itÏappears€the€defense€of€the€accused€was€not€hampered€by€the€lack€of€specificity€of€theÏindictment.€€òòByrdóó,€820€S.W.2d€at€742;€òòState€v.€Andersonóó,€748€S.W.2d€201,€204€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1985).Ìà àThe€record€reflects€the€state€gave€the€defendant€the€information€it€had.€TheÏtaped€conversations€between€the€defendant€and€his€ex„wife€provided€the€specifics€ofÍmany€of€the€acts.€In€fact,€the€statements€indicated€there€were€more€crimes€committedÏthan€those€indicted.€The€psychologistððs€report€also€indicated€the€defendantÏacknowledged€sexual€contact€with€the€child„victim.€The€only€thing€the€defendant€didÏnot€have€were€statements€made€by€the€child„victim€and€her€sister.€€Her€sisterððsÏtestimony€helped€to€provide€the€time„frame€when€the€family€lived€in€the€trailer€and€thenÏin€the€Moscow€house.€€This€was€information€€the€defendant€obviously€knew.€ThisÏinformation€was€provided€to€the€defendant€in€the€stateððs€letter.Ìà àThe€original€indictment€limited€the€offenses€to€a€period€between€June€1990€andÏJune€1994;€the€amended€indictment€limited€the€offenses€to€a€period€between€JuneÏ1991€and€June€1994.€This€protected€the€defendantððs€double€jeopardy€rights.€Given€theÏinformation€furnished,€the€defendant€was€provided€with€notice€of€the€charges;€the€courtÏwas€provided€with€adequate€grounds€upon€which€to€enter€a€judgment;€and€theÏdefendant€was€protected€from€being€placed€in€double€jeopardy.€€The€state€wouldÏð ðobviously€be€estopped€from€initiating€subsequent€prosecutions€for€any€similarÏoffenses€against€the€same€victims€occurring€within€the€same€time€period.ðð€€òòByrdóó,€820ÏS.W.2d€at€741.€Ìà àFurthermore,€the€defendant€was€neither€prejudiced€nor€surprised€at€trial.€HisÏdefense€was€not€hampered€by€the€lack€of€specificity€in€the€indictment.€Ìà àThe€defendant€took€the€stand€and€denied€all€of€the€offenses.€€He€attempted€toÏdiscredit€Brenda€Gibson€by€testifying€that€she€had€been€unfaithful€to€him;€he€alsoÏclaimed€to€be€under€her€control.€He€said€he€was€so€in€love€with€her,€that€he€wouldÏhave€done€anything€to€keep€her.€She€did€not€testify,€so€his€testimony€wentÏunchallenged.Ìà àThe€defendant€claimed€Brenda€Gibson€threatened€him€a€month€before€sheÏsecretly€recorded€her€conversation€with€him.€€He€testified€Gibson€told€him€that€if€heÏwould€admit€to€sexually€molesting€one€of€the€girls,€she€and€Jamie,€their€daughter,Ïwould€move€back€in€with€him.€€Otherwise,€he€would€not€see€his€daughter€again.€ÏAccording€to€the€defendant,€she€also€told€him€he€had€to€attend€counseling€with€her.€ÏHe€also€testified€she€told€him€that€if€he€provided€her€with€his€Bronco,€$5,000€cash,€aÏwasher/dryer,€some€furniture,€and€$400€a€month€child€support€she€would€not€claim€thatÏhe€sexually€abused€her€daughter.€€He€also€said€his€ex„wife€aroused€him€sexually€andÏthen€stopped.€€She€said€until€he€did€what€she€wanted€she€would€go€no€further.€€Ìà àRegarding€the€conversations€on€the€tapes€and€his€admissions,€the€defendantÏtestified€€he€was€too€drunk€and€he€did€not€remember€making€any€of€those€statements.€ÏAs€for€his€conversation€with€Dr.€Battle€and€those€admissions,€he€said€he€was€ð ðtooÏupsetðð€at€the€meeting€and€did€not€remember€making€those€statements.€€While€he€didÏnot€remember€making€the€statements,€he€testified€he€made€them€because€of€herÏthreats.€€Gibson€said€he€would€do€anything€his€ex„wife€had€asked€because€he€wantedÏher€back.Ìà à€The€defendant€was€able€to€tell€jurors€his€full€story€and€was€not€hampered€by€aÏlack€of€a€bill€of€particulars.€Ìà àThis€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓADMITTANCE€OF€AUDIO€TAPESÌ€ó óÌÓ  Óà àThe€defendant€contends€the€trial€court€committed€error€of€prejudicial€dimensionÍby€admitting€into€evidence€two€audio€tapes€containing€conversations€with€his€ex„wife.Ìà àOne€tape€was€recorded€on€July€10,€1994€at€Ponchoððs€Mexican€Restaurant€inÏWest€Memphis,€Arkansas.€€A€second€tape€was€recorded€July€18,€1994€at€MazzioððsÏPizza€in€Memphis.€The€conversations€lasted€several€hours.€€Brenda€Gibson€wore€aÏconcealed€microphone.€€Tennessee€Bureau€of€Investigation€agents€recorded€theÏconversations€on€audio€tape.€During€the€€conversation,€Brenda€Gibson€engaged€theÏdefendant€in€conversation€about€the€sexual€assaults€on€her€daughter.€€She€asked€theÏdefendant€for€more€specific€information€as€to€what€occurred€and€when.€Ìà àThe€defendant€admitted€to€sexually€abusing€the€young€girl.€€His€language€wasÏoften€raw€and€lewd.€€He€said€the€victim€masturbated€him€and€a€ð ðfew€timesðð€performedÏoral€sex€on€him.€€He€also€admitted€to€penile€penetration€of€the€victim€saying€ð ðvery€fewÏtimes€did€my€[penis]€touch€her.ðð€€He€estimated€it€was€not€more€than€ten€times.€€HeÏadmitted€telling€the€victim€if€she€told€anyone€about€what€had€been€occurring€ð ðweððd€allÏget€in€trouble.ðð€Ìà àDuring€the€July€18€conversation€Gibson€said,€€ð ðIt€wasnððt€very€many.€€The€wholeÏthing€wasnððt€that€many.€€I€donððt€think€it€was€20€times€the€whole€time,€the€whole€year€youÏare€talking€about.€€Hell,€like€you€say€one€timeððs€enough€Iððm€guilty.ððÌà àThe€defendant€attempted€to€suppress€the€tapes.€€He€argued€he€was€tricked€andÏentrapped€into€making€the€incriminating€statements,€and€his€statements€were€notÏvoluntary.€He€claimed€the€statements€were€taken€in€violation€of€his€constitutional€rightsÏagainst€self„incrimination,€right€to€counsel,€and€due€process.€The€defendant€objectedÏto€the€admissibility€of€the€tapes€based€upon€the€authentication€of€the€tapes€byÏTennessee€Bureau€Investigation€Agent€Terrell€McLean.€€He€argued€what€AgentÍMcLean€heard€was€hearsay.€€On€appeal€he€argues€playing€the€tape€containing€BrendaÏGibsonððs€accusations€in€the€presence€of€the€jury€violated€his€rights€to€confront€theÏwitnesses€against€him.€€Brenda€Gibson€was€not€called€by€the€state€to€testify€during€theÏtrial.€€Objection€is€also€made€to€Brenda€Gibsonððs€statements€regarding€what€herÏdaughter€told€her.€€The€defendant€also€argues€Brenda€Gibsonððs€statements€areÏhearsay€and€her€statements€as€to€what€her€daughter€said€constitute€double€hearsay.Ìà àWhen€the€recordings€were€made€the€defendant€had€not€been€arrested.€He€wasÏmerely€a€suspect€in€the€sexual€abuse€of€his€wifeððs€daughter.€Therefore,€his€rightsÏagainst€self„incrimination,€to€counsel,€and€due€process€were€not€violated.Ìà àThis€case€is€analogous€to€òòState€v.€Jonesóó,€598€S.W.2d€209,€222„23€(Tenn.Ï1980),€in€which€transcripts€of€taped€conversations€between€a€defendant€and€a€non„testifying€witness€were€presented€to€a€jury€by€the€agents€who€monitored€them.× ƒ2 ××  ×€€LikeÏGibson,€Jones€raised€the€confrontation€issue.€€The€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€inÏòòJonesóó€said€that€it€was€neither€a€confrontation€nor€hearsay€problem.€Ìà àBrenda€Gibsonððs€statements€on€the€tapes€were€not€hearsay€because€herÏstatements€were€not€offered€for€the€truth€of€the€matter€asserted.€Tenn.€R.€Evid.€801(c);Ïòòseeóó€òòJonesóó,€598€S.W.2d€at€223.€Her€statements€were€not€offered€or€intended€to€beÏsubstantive€evidence.€The€purpose€of€her€comments€was€to€elicit€statements€from€theÏdefendant.€€As€in€òòJonesóó,€the€state€did€not€ask€the€jury€to€believe€what€she€said€on€theÏtapes.€€The€stateððs€primary€objective€was€to€bring€before€the€jury€the€statements€madeÍby€the€defendant.€€See€òòJonesóó,€598€S.W.2d€at€223.Ìà àThe€issue€of€confrontation€does€not€apply€to€the€statements€made€by€BrendaÏGibson.€Likewise,€what€the€court€said€in€òòJonesóóis€applicable€here.€ð ðThe€issue€ofÏconfrontation€does€not€arise€as€to€her.€The€mere€fact€that€cross„examining€her€wouldÏhave€been€a€defense€lawyerððs€delight,€and€that€this€opportunity€did€not€present€itself,Ïdoes€not€operate€to€add€a€constitutional€dimension€to€the€situation.ðð€òòJonesóó,€598ÏS.W.2d€at€223.€€Even€though€she€did€not€testify,€the€defendant€attacked€her€credibilityÏwhen€he€testified.€€Moreover,€her€conversation€added€nothing€to€the€case€in€light€of€theÏdefendantððs€own€admissions€on€the€audio€tapes,€those€made€to€his€psychologist€andÏin€light€of€the€victimððs€testimony.€Ìà àThe€òòJonesóócourt€held€tape€recordings€may€be€presented€by€any€witness€whoÏwas€present€during€the€recording€or€any€witness€who€monitored€the€recording€as€longÏas€he€can€identify€the€declarant€with€certainty€and€his€testimony€comports€with€theÏother€rules€of€evidence.€598€S.W.2d€at€223.€€The€court€continued,€ð ðIn€all€such€cases€theÏjury€should€be€instructed€that€only€the€statements,€admissions€and€declarations€of€theÏdeclarant€may€be€considered€in€the€question€of€guilt€or€innocence.€Further€anyÏstatement€made€by€a€nontestifying€party€to€the€conversation€which€tends€to€beÏprejudicial€to€the€defendant€must€be€redacted,€unless€admissible€under€some€otherÏrule€of€law.ðð€€òòJonesóó,€598€S.W.2d€at€223.€€In€òòJonesóó€the€court€found€that€full€opportunityÏwas€given€to€cross„examine€the€agent€who€presented€the€transcripts€to€the€jury.€òòJonesóó,Ï598€S.W.2d€at€224.€Ìà àWhile€it€is€true€Brenda€Gibson€was€a€nontestifying€party€and€the€record€indicatesÍno€instruction€was€given€in€this€case€when€the€tapes€were€played€for€the€jury,× ƒ4 ××  ×€herÏstatements€were€not€prejudicial€compared€with€those€made€by€the€defendant.× ƒ5 ××  ×€Ìà àIf€the€defendant€desired€a€limiting€instruction€regarding€the€statements€made€byÏBrenda€Gibson€contained€on€the€tapes,€he€should€have€moved€the€trial€court€to€giveÏsuch€an€instruction.€€Tennessee€Rules€of€Evidence€105€places€the€burden€of€triggeringÏa€request€for€a€limiting€instruction€upon€the€party€who€seeks€or€is€entitled€to€theÏinstruction.€€Tennessee€Rules€of€Evidence€105€states:€€ð ð[T]he€court€upon€request€shallÏrestrict€the€evidence€to€its€proper€scope€and€instruct€the€jury€accordingly.ðð€€The€failureÏto€request€a€limiting€instruction€results€in€the€waiver€of€the€issue.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.Ï36(a).ÌÌò òÓ  ÓACCESS€TO€DHS€RECORDSÌó óÌÓ  Óà àThe€defendant€next€contends€the€trial€court€erred€by€denying€him€access€to€theÏchildððs€records€from€the€Department€of€Human€Services.€He€argues€the€records€mayÏhave€contained€exculpatory€information€and€evidence,€namely€the€child€madeÏcontradictory€statements€and€past€claims€of€sexual€abuse.€€Ìà àThe€record€indicates€the€trial€court€planned€to€review€the€records€òòinóó€òòcameraóó€toÍdetermine€whether€there€was€exculpatory€information€contained€in€the€report€€andÏwhether€there€was€support€for€the€court€to€order€a€psychological€and€physicalÏexamination€of€the€child.€€€The€record€includes€no€further€mention€of€what€the€courtÏfound€as€to€the€contents€of€the€records.Ìà àIt€is€the€duty€of€the€defendant€to€prepare€a€record€which€conveys€a€fair,€accurateÏand€complete€account€of€what€transpired€in€the€trial€court€with€respect€to€the€issuesÏwhich€form€the€basis€of€his€appeal.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€p.€24(b);€òòState€v.€Bunchóó,€646ÏS.W.2.d€158,€160€(Tenn.€1983);€òòState€v.€Hopperóó,€695€S.W.2d€530,€537€(Tenn.€Crim.ÏApp.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1985);€òòState€v.€Wallaceóó,€664€S.W.2d€301,€302€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1983).€€When€the€record€is€incomplete,€or€doesÏnot€contain€the€proceedings€relevant€to€an€issue,€this€Court€is€precluded€fromÏconsidering€this€issue.€òòHopperóó,€695€S.W.2d€at€537;€òòState€v.€€Mortonóó,€639€S.W.2d€666,Ï668€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1982);€òòState€v.€Hoosieróó,€631€S.W.2dÏ474,€476€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1982).€Furthermore,€this€Court€must€conclusively€presumeÏthat€the€ruling€of€the€trial€court€was€correct€in€all€particulars.€€òòState€v.€Tayloróó,€669ÏS.W.2d€694,€699€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1983),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1984);€òòState€v.ÏBaronóó,€659€S.W.2d€811,€815€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1983);€òòStateÏv.€Jonesóó,€623€S.W.2d€129,€131€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1981).€€€€€Ìà àAdditionally,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€37„1„612€makes€all€reports€of€child€sexualÏabuse€confidential.€Through€enumerated€exceptions,€the€statute€provides€access€toÏthe€following€(a)€law€enforcement€officers€investigating€child€sexual€abuse,€(b)€theÏdistrict€attorney€general,€(c)€grand€jurors€through€power€of€a€subpoena,€(d)€thoseÏengaged€in€genuine€research€and€audits,€(e)€probation€officers€or€the€like€charged€withÍpresenting€information€in€judicial€or€administrative€proceedings,€and€(f)€those€treatingÏthe€child.Ìà àThose€accused€of€child€sexual€abuse€are€not€among€the€exceptions€to€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€37„1„612.€€Furthermore,€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€16(a)(2)€prohibits€discoveryÏand€inspection€of€reports€and€other€internal€documents€made€by€state€agents€inÏconnection€with€the€investigation€and€prosecution€of€the€case.€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.Ï16(a)(2).€See€also€òòState€v.€Claboóó,€905€S.W.2d€197,€201€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.Ïòòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1995).€€As€in€òòClaboóó,€Gibson€wanted€access€to€the€DHS€records€toÏestablish€inconsistencies€in€the€victimððs€statements€and€to€gain€access€to€informationÏto€impeach€the€victim.€Ìà àThe€defendant€is€not€entitled€to€the€records.€The€issue€is€without€merit.Ìò òà àÓ  ÓREQUEST€FOR€EXAMINATIONó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àThe€defendant€also€contends€the€trial€court€committed€error€of€prejudicialÏdimension€because€the€court€refused€to€require€the€victim€to€submit€to€a€psychologicalÏevaluation€and€physical€examination.€This€Court€is€of€the€opinion€the€trial€court€did€notÏabuse€its€discretion€in€denying€the€defendantððs€motion.Ìà àA€trial€court€should€not€require€a€sex€abuse€victim€to€undergo€a€psychologicalÏexamination€unless€the€ð ðmost€compelling€of€reasonsðð€are€established€by€the€accused.ÏòòForbes€v.€Stateóó,€559€S.W.2d€318,€321€(Tenn.€1977);€òòState€v.€Ballardóó,€714€S.W.2d€284,Ï287€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1986).€The€phrase€ð ðcompellingÏreasonsðð€includes€situations€ð ðwhere€substantial€doubt€is€cast€upon€the€victimððs€sanity,Ïor€where€there€is€a€record€of€prior€mental€disorders€or€sexual€fantasies,€or€where€theÍstory€is€incredible,€and€even€in€these€situations,€only€if€there€is€little€or€no€corroborationÏto€support€the€charge.ðð€€Consequently,€a€trial€court€should€exercise€its€discretionÏsparingly€when€ruling€upon€a€motion€to€require€a€victim€to€undergo€a€psychologicalÏexamination€in€a€sexual€abuse€prosecution.€€òòForbesóó,€559€S.W.2d€at€321.€€In€this€case,Ïthe€trial€court€correctly€found€that€there€was€no€ð ðcompelling€reasonðð€to€require€the€childÏvictim€to€undergo€a€psychological€evaluation.Ìà àThe€defendant€also€filed€a€motion€requiring€the€child€to€be€examined€by€aÏqualified€medical€doctor.€The€examination€would€show,€the€defendant€argues,€theÏchild€had€not€sustained€any€penetration;€this€evidence€would€be€exculpatory€andÏexonerate€the€defendant.€€The€analysis€for€determining€whether€to€compel€a€physicalÏexamination€is€the€same€analysis€discussed€in€òòForbesóó€for€determining€whether€aÏpsychological€examination€should€be€compelled.€€òòState€v.€Baroneóó,€852€S.W.2d€216,Ï221€(Tenn.€1993).€€The€defendant€must€show€a€compelling€need€for€the€examination.€ÏòòBaroneóó,€852€S.W.2d€at€222.€Concerns€of€traumatizing€and€embarrassing€the€victimÏshould€be€balanced€against€the€likelihood€that€the€exam€will€provide€substantialÏmaterial€evidence€for€the€defendant.€In€this€case€an€examination€was€performed€at€theÏMemphis€Sexual€Abuse€Center€and€the€results€were€made€available€to€the€defendant.€ÏIn€fact,€the€defendant€called€Jo€Jones€the€nurse€evaluator€to€testify.€€She€said€her€examÏrevealed€no€evidence€of€sexual€abuse€although€she€qualified€her€answer€saying€thatÏthe€lack€of€evidence€did€not€mean€that€the€sexual€abuse€did€not€occur.€€The€defendantÏcould€have€placed€his€penis€or€finger€in€her€genital€area€without€disturbing€the€hymen.€ÏShe€also€said€she€would€not€expect€to€find€evidence€of€bruising€or€touching€in€that€Ïarea€twenty€days€after€the€last€reported€incident.€€The€defendant€failed€to€establish€aÍcompelling€reason€to€order€another€examination.Ìà à€Thus,€this€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓVICTIMððS€TEDDY€BEARÌ€ó óÌÓ  Óà àThe€defendant€also€complains€the€trial€court€allowed€the€child€to€testify€whileÏholding€a€teddy€bear.€The€defendant€contends€the€bear€was€a€prop€and€it€prejudicedÏthe€defendant€by€making€the€girl€look€pitiful.€Ìà àA€trial€court€has€broad€discretion€in€controlling€the€conduct€of€a€trial.€€€òòPique€v.ÏStateóó,€480€S.W.2d€546,€550„51€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1971),€òòcertóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1972).€ÏThe€court€is€responsible€for€every€aspect€of€the€trial.€€òòState€v.€McCrayóó,€614€S.W.2d€90,Ï93€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1981).€€€Exercise€of€that€discretion€will€not€be€disturbed€exceptÏwhere€an€abuse€is€clearly€demonstrated.€€òòCole€v.€Stateóó,€512€S.W.2d€598,€602€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.),€òòcertóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1974).€€The€defendant€has€failed€to€demonstrate€theÏtrial€court€abused€its€discretion€by€allowing€the€child€witness€to€hold€the€bear€whileÏtestifying.Ìà àThe€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓSENTENCINGÌÌÓ  Óà àó óThe€state€appeals€Gibsonððs€sentences€and€claims€error€in€sentences€for€threeÏcounts€of€child€rape€(Counts€3,€6,€and€7).€€Gibson€did€not€file€a€response€to€this€issue.€Ìà àThe€trial€court€found€the€defendant€to€be€a€standard€offender€and€sentencedÍGibson€to€a€Range€I€sentence€consisting€of€confinement€for€twenty„one€(21)€years€inÏthe€Department€of€Correction€for€each€of€the€four€offenses.€The€trial€court€ordered€thatÏthe€sentences€are€to€be€served€concurrently.€€The€effective€sentence€is€21€years.€TheÏorder€stated€Gibson€will€serve€30€percent€of€all€the€sentences€before€he€is€eligible€forÏrelease€classification.€€It€is€apparent€€the€trial€court€sentenced€Gibson€under€theÏaggravated€rape€statute€for€all€counts€which€allows€for€the€possibility€of€release€afterÏserving€a€portion€of€the€sentence.€Ìà àThe€state€argues€that€for€three€of€the€four€convictions€(Counts€3,€6,€and€7),€theÏdefendant€should€have€been€sentenced€under€the€child€rape€statutes,€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€ðð€39„13„522€(Supp.€1996)€and€39„13„523€(Supp.€1996),€which€went€into€effectÏJuly€1,€1992.€€The€defendant€was€indicted€under€the€child€rape€statute€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€39„13„522€for€all€four€charges.€€As€the€state€notes,€only€the€offense€in€count€2Ïoccurred€prior€to€the€effective€date€of€the€child€rape€law€July€1,€1992.Ì€à àTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€39„13„523(b)€provides:€ÌÓÓà8 àà8 à(b)€Notwithstanding€any€other€provision€of€law€to€theÏcontrary,€a€multiple€rapist€or€child€rapist,€as€defined€inÏsubsection€(a),€shall€be€required€to€serve€the€entireÏsentence€imposed€by€the€court€undiminished€by€anyÏsentence€reduction€credits€such€person€may€be€eligible€toÏearn.€.€.€.€ÌÓÓÌà àThe€proof€at€trial€established€three€of€the€offenses,€Counts€3,€6,€and€7,€occurredÏafter€July€1,€1992.€€The€victimððs€testimony€and€the€timetable€provided€by€her€sisterÏindicated€those€three€offenses€occurred€after€their€half„sister,€Jamie,€was€born€inÏNovember€of€1992.€€This€would€place€the€offenses€after€the€effective€date€of€the€statute.€Ìà àFor€this€reason,€the€defendant€should€have€been€sentenced€under€Tenn.€CodeÍAnn.€€ðð€39„13„523(b)€for€Counts€€3,€6,€and€7.€€Therefore,€this€case€is€remanded€to€theÏtrial€court€for€resentencing€in€accordance€with€this€opinion.€ÌÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà à________________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à€€€€€€€€JOE€B.€JONES,€PRESIDING€JUDGEÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ_____________________________________Ì€à àDAVID€H.€WELLES,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌ_____________________________________Ìà à€€JERRY€L.€SMITH,€JUDGE