WPCW  <!w[TпY^p=W[,)Qf*Ҷ.{O/!Xx\bg&CAZc`1iP0y|gX9O4C/OfPkg6|t%fr,cQHNɗ)bnNH@.UVQ-3(DC 5s|2|0ӉRl'ztێ$:䏛/8ObW/miЍ8%v:^H3K]sTٙFGɣWʂZ fYE jsU+D'!۸=OkBъDE^#eUܱ[ udV@rj@BM&|DҍEK4  z(m\E0=P4tTm͜hG#G3=na#!NUNo % 0(U:w% 4) = L U:T N ^  m 5 U: AQ$ u 0D; 0D 0D D3 B: HP LaserJet 8000 DN PS0(9 Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($,rAZ"Arial RegulartpO'3|x"Arial Regular d'L U + ["  _X XXXXX    Ad FILEDX X  October19,1999Cecil_Crowson_,Jr.AppellateCourtClerkdAx ,rAZ"Arial RegularZ[\]_C<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1  ````'dxd d !  _X XXX  TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T  8   XXdd8xY_B2.jz`  `@E` 8ttxP x_INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  ATJACKSON    AUGUST1999SESSION  `   TROYLEEGODWIN,  h     )  T  `     h     ) `  Appellant , h     ) C.C.A.No.02C019811CC00364   &   `     h     ) vs . `     h     ) GibsonCounty     `     h     ) STATEOFTENNESSEE, h     ) Hon.DickJerman,Jr.,Judge  z    `     h     ) f   `  Appellee . h     ) (PostConviction)  L  `     h     ) FORTHEAPPELLANT: h     FORTHEAPPELLEE: T  ROBERTW.NEWELL  h     PAULG.SUMMERS  & AttorneyAtLaw   h     AttorneyGeneral&Reporter  P.O.Box99Humboldt,TN38343 h     GEORGIABLYTHEFELNER   `     h     CounselforState z  `     h     425FifthAvenueNorth `     h     Nashville,TN37243 `    CLAYBURNPEEPLES h  `     h     DistrictAttorneyGeneral  T  `     h     BRIANFULLER  !&   `     h   Asst.DistrictAttorneyGeneral `     h 110SouthCollegeStreet,Suite200 `     h Trenton,TN38382 x   $#  ` OPINIONFILED:_____________  *(&*  AFFIRMED v.). JAMESCURWOODWITT,JR.,JUDGE  &2v-2   3H/4 _   @`  @  @  @h  @ OPINION      `  Thepetitioner,TroyLeeGodwin,appealstheGibsonCountyCircuit b Courtsdismissalofhispetitionforpostconvictionrelief.Thepetitionerraisestwo . ~ issues:(1)whetherhewasdenieddueprocessoflawandequalprotectionofthe  J lawbecausetheconvictingevidenceofaggravatedrapewasinsufficient,and(2)    whetherthetrialcourterredinnotdismissingthechargeofaggravatedkidnapping,   whichwasbaseduponatheoryofcomplicity,forinsufficiencyoftheconvicting ^  evidenceinviewofthedismissalofthechargeagainsttheprincipaloffender.See *z  Statev.Coleman,865S.W.2d455(Tenn.1993).Weaffirmthetrialcourts F judgment.   `  FollowinghisJune21,1989convictionsofarmedrobbery,aggravated Z rape,andaggravatedkidnapping,thepetitionersfirstdirectappealresultedinthis &v courtsremandforresentencing.Statev.TroyLeeGodwin,No.4(Tenn.Crim. B App.,Jackson,July25,1990)(GodwinI).Afterresentencingandasubsequent  appealofthesentencingorder,thiscourtagainreversedforresentencing.State   v.TroyLeeGodwin,No.02C019103CR00037(Tenn.Crim.App.,Jackson,Sept. V"! 18,1991)(GodwinII).Afterthethirdsentencingdetermination,thiscourtmodified "$r# thesentences.Statev.TroyLeeGodwin,No.02C019206CC00139(Tenn.Crim. %>!% App.,Jackson,Feb.3,1993)(GodwinIII).OnMay2,1996,thepetitionerfileda ' #' petitionforpostconvictionrelief,whichthetrialcourtdismissedastimebarred. )$) Thiscourtoverturnedthatrulingondirectappeal.TroyLeeGodwinv.State,No. R+&+ 02C019611CC00426(Tenn.Crim.App.,Jackson,Sept.19,1997)(GodwinIV). -n(- Afterremand,amendmentofthepetition,andahearingheldOctober15,1998,the .:*/ trialcourtdismissedthepetitionforpostconvictionrelief.Itisfromthisactionthat 0,1 thecurrentappealistaken. 2-3  `  The1989convictionsresultedfromthe1988robberyofashoestore 6j17 bythepetitionerandacodefendant,JohnD.Coleman.Colemanheldapistoland 7639 forcedafemaleclerktosurrendermoney,andthenColemanhadthepetitionerwait 95; nearthedoorwhileColemanrapedthefemaleclerkatgunpoint.GodwinI,slipop.  at23.Thepetitionerwasconvictedofthreeoffenses:armedrobbery,forwhich | hereceivedasentenceoftenyears,aggravatedrape,forwhichhereceiveda H sentenceof25years,andaggravatedkidnapping,forwhichhereceivedasentence  d offifteenyears.ThesesentencesarerunningconcurrentlyasaresultofGodwin  0 IIandGodwinIII.     `  InGodwinscodefendantscase,Statev.Coleman,oursupreme D  courtheldthatColemansaggravatedkidnappingwasincidentaltothecommission ` oftheotherfeloniesandreversedtheconvictionbaseduponStatevAnthony. , SeeColeman865S.W.2dat957.Anthonyholdsthatdueprocessrequirements  forbidakidnappingprosecutionwhentheconfinement,movementordetentionof t thevictimis essentiallyincidentaltotheaccompanyingfelony.Statev.Anthony, @ 817S.W.2d299,306(Tenn.1991).  \  `  InGodwinI,thepetitionerargued thattheevidenceisnotsufficient  beyondareasonabledoubttoconvicthimofthecrimescharged.GodwinI,slipop. p!  at10.Thiscourtheldthattheevidencewassufficienttoconvictthepetitioner as <#" aiderandabettorinthecommissionofaggravatedkidnappingandaggravatedrape, %X $ ...andjointlyguiltywithColemanofthecrimeofrobberywithadeadlyweapon. &$"& Id.at11.Thepetitionerdidnotseekthesupremecourtspermissiontoappealthis (#( decision. l*%*  `  Inthepresentcase,thetrialcourtdeniedpostconvictionreliefviaan .T). orderwhichdoesnotspecifythegroundsforthecourtsaction;however,thestate / +0 arguedthatthepetitionersclaimswerewaivedand,duringthepostconviction 1,2 hearing,thecourtindicatedthatatleastpartofthepetitionersclaims shouldhave h3.4 beenaddressedon...directappeal. 4506  `  Bothofthepetitionersappellateissuesarepredicateduponaclaim 84: ofinsufficiencyoftheconvictingevidence.Becausethesufficiencyoftheevidence  wasraisedandresolvedondirectappealinGodwinI,weconcludethatall | sufficiencyoftheevidenceissueshavebeeneitherpreviouslydeterminedor H waived.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4030206(f),(g),(h)(1997).Accordingly,the  d issuesraisedonthisappealassufficiencyissueswereproperlydismissed.  0  `  Wehaveconsideredwhetherthepetitionerssecondissue,whichis x  groundedupontheresultinColeman,althoughnotnowcognizableasasufficiency D  issue,mightbereviewedasastraightforwardissueofconstitutionalerror.Atthe ` timethiscourtfileditsopinioninGodwinI,Anthonyhadnotbeendecided. , Moreover,thereapparentlyhadneverbeenahearinginthepetitionerscaseonthe  Anthonyissue,andaccordingly,theAnthonyconstitutionalissuehadnotbeen t previouslydeterminedinsofarasthepetitionerisconcerned.SeeTenn.CodeAnn. @ 4030206(h)(1997).  \  `  However,weareconstrainedtoconcludethatthisissuehasbeen  waived.Anissueis waivedifthepetitionerpersonallyorthroughanattorneyfailed p!  topresentitfordeterminationinanyproceedingbeforeacourtofcompetent <#" jurisdiction.Tenn.CodeAnn.4030206(g)(1997).Anexceptionisprovided %X $ whentheclaimisbaseduponaconstitutionalrightthat wasnotrecognizedas &$"& existingatthetimeoftrial.Tenn.CodeAnn.4030206(g)(1)(1997).The (#( problemforthepetitionerinavoidingthewaiverruleisthat,inStatev.Denton,938 l*%* S.W.2d373(Tenn.1996),oursupremecourtsaidthatAnthonydidnotcreatea 8,', newlyrecognizedconstitutionalright.Denton,938S.W.2dat377.Inlightofthis .T). determination,thefailuretoraisetheAnthonyissueondirectappealconstitutes / +0 waiver. 1,2  `  Forthereasonsexplainedabove,weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrial 7P28 court. 84: Ї `     h     _________________________________   `     h     JAMESCURWOODWITT,JR.,JUDGE  CONCUR:  d _______________________________   DAVIDH.WELLES,JUDGE x  _______________________________ F JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE