ÿWPCû ÂL²ÐÜ—dÚÍÞâØ ‰&`Þa§†„gö—¯Óö”ï:äñÿÂ`)å‡S™¦rhЃ‹S×”=J·”ßât±Hx Žlò¬>üÛ%°ßI{›èW´—äXE"v˜Cˆ”½tŒJ:CàJ³Ø£Èw.ŸŒÝ+Ýr¿ØèÒF~Ç,%ð‡Ó]æŠ TwmtóyÞd—†C“ œÌŽW›;6#BoÏÃì<’Á* °ŒÐÙ}1ÈþqEƒœÇ'¤ô挱æÈ 9‡ëÿµ½N"Ñçe%~¤HŸ› rß½(IbqJWvy4ZôñµHr] 3˜-ƒêjVM»®} Ïkœ¼„ÁÉߣÀŽ*d„ŒM©Bz5¾F±<«¢C;¦j¬3© Ô6e«vûT‘7Å¡(!X-Qºì*¦„GVé‡w¯áÝŸª dÄŽýcy=D¾ò¿Í&3Ùâi¨Ê®bePgZÏæÝL¯:Š„ÐþŸ»}ß ¡mžzª$Ž=ÛÅdIz¹Áqh`ltÉvsü¦MŠ¡Md5Ô×ì,lÜCˆSPT¿•²ô=õU½8AÙ€W&5…Äcüõ"%|\$þ%ÌÖ°¤:É©{)ºØÐ7šVÀNÆEÜ{/Êav¦Za×äZ`} ,# hUNs %Á 0(Çw@ï4/CR 0”ZU:î ( 0DHU:Œ ÆU:æ UN bn  v U:– UNÐ $ D3B U:u u u u u u u u u u 0D¯ Bó ó ó ó AQÆa 0D' 0Dk D/¯ BÞ˜HP LaserJet 4HPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLÜÏ(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡ DD+eeÓ€ø‚&3|x'(D(2´¤$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó,ó‚ AZ"Arial Regular Ý ƒ ´¤$ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ‡ X¯XXXÔThis€child€was€born€while€the€appellant€was€serving€one€of€the€ninety„dayÐ ° Ðsentences.€Ô#†X\ÿXX X¯k#Ô(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular Ý ƒ ´¤$ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ‡X¯XXXÔThis€child€was€born€while€the€appellant€was€serving€one€of€the€ninety„dayÐ ° Ðsentences.€Ô#†X\ÿXX X¯k#Ô,ó‚ AZ"Arial Regular(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular- ù- Ý ƒ ´¤$ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ‡X¯XXXÔThis€child€was€born€while€the€appellant€was€serving€one€of€the€ninety„dayÐ ° Ðsentences.€Ô#†X\ÿXX X¯k#Ô,ó‚ AZ"Arial Regular(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular Ý ƒ(¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€X XXXÔÔ€ŸQXX ÔÓ  ÓÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X XŸQÔÐ  ÐÌò òMay€28,€1999Ð šš ÐÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ôË ôXX ÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó""""'ÿÿdxd,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý d'(!)*Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó++'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýññ›ññññññ›ññññññ›ññÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€ XŸpXXXÔÓ  Óññœßr€&<,(j 8` `€€@E ±` ttx$X°ð Õrß›ññIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÐ ° ÐÌAT€KNOXVILLEÌÌFEBRUARY€1999€SESSIONÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓÌÌÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à h àà À àà  à)Ð `  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àC.C.A.€No.€03C01„9801„CC„00017Ð P  Ðà ` àAppellee,à  àà h àà À àà  à)Ð ð@  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àBlount€CountyÐ à0  Ðv.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àà È àÐ Ð  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àHonorable€D.€Kelly€Thomas,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ À ÐLOWELL€CLAYTON€GREDIG,€JR.,à  à)Ð ° Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p à(Probation€Revocation)Ð  ð Ðà ` àAppellant.à  àà h àà À àà  à)Ð à ÐÌÌÌÌÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à h àà À àà  àà p àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:Ð 0€ ÐÌNatalee€S.€Hurleyà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àJohn€Knox€WalkupÐ ` ÐAssistant€Public€Defenderà h àà À àà  àà p àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÐ P Ð419€High€Streetà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÐ ð@ ÐMaryville,€TN€€37804à h àà À àà  àà p àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493Ð à0 Ð(At€Trial)Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àMichael€J.€Fahey,€IIÌGerald€L.€Gulleyà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÐ °"  ÐP.€O.€Box€1708à  àà h àà À àà  àà p à425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÐ  #ð! ÐKnoxville,€TN€€37901„1708à À àà  àà p àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493Ð $à" Ð(On€Appeal)Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àMichael€L.€FlynnÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à363€Court€StreetÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àMaryville,€TN€€37804„5906ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àLisa€McKenzieÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à363€Court€StreetÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àMaryville,€TN€€37804„5906ÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€_____________________________________ÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌÌL.€T.€LAFFERTY,€SENIOR€JUDGEÌÐ   :p59 ÐÔ‡ ¼‘¼X XŸpÔòòò òÓ  ÓÑ€ÑÑ7€ Ÿp XXdðXXdð7ÑO€P€I€N€I€O€Nó óóóÔ#† XŸpX¼ ¼‘#ÔÐ ° ÐÓÂÓÓÓÌà ` àThe€appellant,€Lowell€Clayton€Gredig,€Jr.,€appeals€as€of€right€from€the€revocationÏof€his€probation.€The€appellant€challenges€both€the€revocation€and€the€denial€of€anÏalternative€sentence,€insisting€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€revoking€his€probation€and€inÏsentencing€him€to€incarceration€in€lieu€of€imposing€an€alternative€sentence.€€After€a€carefulÏreview€of€the€entire€record,€briefs€and€arguments€of€the€parties,€and€applicable€law,€weÏaffirm€the€trial€courtððs€judgment.€ÌÌÓ  Óò òI.Ð Æ ÐPROCEDURAL€BACKGROUNDÌÌó óÓ  Óà ` àOn€December€5,€1994,€the€Blount€County€grand€jury€indicted€the€appellant€in€CauseÐ f¶ ÐNo.€8668€for€statutory€rape,€occurring€in€November,€1994.€€On€October€1,€1996,€theÏappellant€entered€a€plea€of€guilty€to€statutory€rape€and€was€sentenced€to€eighteen€monthsÏin€the€Blount€County€Jail.€€The€sentence€was€suspended,€and€the€appellant€was€placed€onÏimmediate€supervised€probation.€€Special€conditions€of€probation€were€imposed€by€the€trialÏcourt.€ÌÌà ` à€On€February€11,€1997,€the€trial€court€issued€a€violation€of€probation€warrant€for€theÏappellant.€€The€warrant€was€premised€upon€the€appellantððs€failure€to€notify€his€probationÏofficer€of€his€arrests€for€assault€and€public€intoxication€on€February€7€and€10,€1997;€failureÏto€maintain€employment;€failure€to€notify€his€probation€officer€of€his€change€of€address;€aÏviolation€of€court€imposed€curfew;€failure€to€attend€AA€or€GED€classes€as€instructed;€andÏfailure€to€pay€court€costs.€ññœññ€Onññ›ññ€April€8,€1997,€the€appellant€stipulated€to€the€violations.€€TheÏtrial€court€revoked€the€appellantððs€probation€and€ordered€the€appellant€to€serve€ninety€daysÏin€the€Blount€County€Jail€and€then€be€released€to€intensive€probation€for€the€balance€of€theÏsentence.€ÌÌà ` àOn€April€28,€1997,€the€Blount€County€grand€jury€indicted€the€appellant€for€assaultÐ F:–59 Ðin€Cause€No.€10214.€€On€August€1,€1997,€the€appellant€pled€guilty€to€assault€and€wasÏsentenced€to€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days,€to€run€consecutively€to€the€statutoryÏrape€conviction€in€Cause€No.€8668.€€The€trial€court€suspended€the€sentence€and€placedÏthe€appellant€on€immediate€supervised€probation.€€The€trial€court€entered€a€supplementalÏprobation€order€enlarging€on€the€special€conditions€of€probation€to€be€performed€by€theÏappellant.ÌÌà ` àOn€May€27,€1997,€the€trial€court€issued€a€warrant€for€violation€of€probation,€CauseÏNo.€8668,€ññœññññbyññññ›forññññ›ññ€the€appellant€based€upon€his€arrest€for€simple€assault€on€May€26,€1997.€ÏAgain,€the€appellant€stipulated€to€the€violation€of€probation.€€The€trial€court€revokedÏprobation,€requiring€the€appellant€to€serve€ninety€days€and€then€be€re„released€on€intensiveÏprobation.€€Additionally,€the€trial€court€ordered€the€appellant€to€reside€in€a€halfway€houseÏfor€a€minimum€of€six€months€as€a€condition€of€probation.€ÌÌà ` àOn€November€21,€1997,€the€trial€court€issued€another€warrant€for€the€appellant€forÏviolation€of€probation€in€Cause€Nos.€8668€and€10214.€€The€warrant€alleged€the€appellantÏwas€arrested€on€November€7,€ññœññ1997ññ,ññññ›ññ€for€public€intoxication€and€resisting€arrest;€failed€toÏadvise€his€probation€officer€about€his€residence€or€employment;€ññœññññthe›€appellant›€ññusedññ›ññ€alcohol;€failed€toÏreside€at€a€halfway€house;€failed€to€report€to€his€probation€officer€since€November€4,€1997;Ïand€failed€to€pay€court€costs.€ÌÌà ` àAfter€the€conclusion€of€a€revocation€proceeding,€the€trial€court€entered€orders€onÏboth€causes€on€January€9,€1998.€€The€trial€court€revoked€the€appellantððs€probation€inÏCause€No.€8668,€allowing€the€appellant€236€days€jail€credit.€€In€Cause€No.€10214,€the€trialÏcourt€revoked€the€appellantððs€probation€for€assault,€modifying€the€judgment€to€elevenÏmonths€and€twenty„nine€days€in€jail,€fifty€percent€release€eligibility€prior€to€release€onÏprobation,€and€zero€percent€release€eligibility€in€all€other€areas.€€The€court€allowed€theÏappellant€62€days€jail€credit.ÌÐ 09€48 ÐÓ  Óò òII.€Ð ° ÐVIOLATION€OF€PROBATIONÌÌó óÓ  Óà ` àFirst,€the€appellant€argues€the€trial€court€erred€in€revoking€his€probation€on€theÐ P   Ðgrounds€there€was€no€substantial€evidence€to€support€the€trial€courtððs€decision€to€revokeÏprobation,€and€the€trial€court€considered€only€the€nature€and€character€of€the€offense,Ïthereby€constituting€ð ðtoo€narrow€a€viewðð€of€the€relevant€factors.€€The€state€submits€thereÏis€ample€evidence€in€the€record€to€support€the€trial€courtððs€decision.ÌÌà ` àA€trial€court€may€revoke€probation€and€order€the€imposition€of€the€original€sentenceÏupon€a€finding€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€a€person€has€violated€theÏconditions€of€probation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„311.€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€court€willÏnot€be€disturbed€on€appeal,€unless€it€appears€that€there€has€been€an€abuse€of€discretion.ÏFor€an€appellate€court€to€be€warranted€in€finding€an€abuse€of€discretion€in€a€probation€case,Ïit€must€be€established€that€the€record€contains€no€substantial€evidence€to€support€theÏconclusion€of€the€trial€judge€that€a€violation€of€the€conditions€of€probation€has€occurred.ÏòòState€v.€Harkins,€óó811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.€1991).€ññœññññ€ññññ›Ð °"  ЛÐ °"  Лà È àññTheññ›ññ€evidence€at€the€revocation€hearingÐ °"  Ðneed€only€show€that€the€trial€court€exercised€a€conscientious€and€intelligent€judgment€inÏmaking€its€decision€to€revoke€probation.€òò€State€v.€Leach,€óó914€S.W.2d€104,€106€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð p&À!$ ÐApp.€1995).ÌÌÓ  Óò òA.€Ð ,`'* ÐRevocation€ProceedingÌÌó óÓ  Óà ` àMarcus€Miller,€probation€officer,€testified€that€the€appellant€began€probationaryÐ °1-0 Ðsupervision€on€October€1,€1996,€with€Probation€Officer€Carolyn€Brewer.€€The€appellantÏviolated€this€period€of€probation€by€being€arrested€for€new€offenses,€assault€and€publicÏintoxication.€€The€appellantððs€probation€was€thereafter€revoked,€and€he€received€a€ninety„¼day€sentence€in€jail€along€with€intensive€probation.€€Shortly€thereafter,€the€appellant€wasÐ 09€48 Ðarrested€for€simple€assault.€€Following€a€hearing,€the€appellant€was€ordered€to€serveÏanother€period€of€ninety€days€and€was€released€on€intensive€probation,€with€the€specialÏcondition€that€he€enter€a€halfway€house€for€six€months.€€The€appellant€failed€to€comply€withÏthis€special€condition.€€Miller€also€testified€that€the€appellant€failed€to€pay€his€court€costs,Ïfailed€to€attend€the€Anger€Management€Program,€and€failed€to€report€since€October,€1997.€ÏDuring€the€appellantððs€second€period€of€intensive€probation,€the€appellant€had€three€newÏarrests.ÌÌà ` àMiller€testified€that€the€appellant€was€arrested€twice€for€public€intoxication€andÏresisting€arrest€in€November,€1997.€€In€December,€1997,€the€appellant€was€convicted€ofÏtheft€of€property€over€$500€for€taking€his€motherððs€car€and€wrecking€the€same.€€He€wasÏsentenced€to€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days.€€Miller€agreed€he€had€not€contactedÏany€halfway€houses€to€determine€the€appellantððs€attendance€or€lack€thereof.€€The€appellantÏinformed€Miller€he€had€been€denied€acceptance€at€Stepps€House€for€failure€to€pay€backÏrent.€ÌÌà ` àThe€appellant€testified€he€is€married€and€has€a€four„month„old€child.ññññ׃ ×ññññ׃×ññññññ׃×ññÝ ƒ %ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Prior€to€hisÐ °"  Ðarrest,€the€appellant€was€employed€with€Burris€Wood€Company,€making€hardwood€floors.€ÏThe€appellant€described€his€income€ð ðas€not€much.ðð€€Upon€release€for€his€second€intensiveÏprobation€period,€the€appellant€attempted€to€enter€Cornerstone,€a€halfway€house,€but€hisÏbed€had€been€given€away.€€The€appellant€then€contacted€Stepps€House,€which€told€himÏhe€could€sleep€on€a€couch€if€there€was€no€bed€available.€€However,€Stepps€House€refusedÏto€honor€this€commitment€and€denied€him€acceptance€for€non„payment€of€back€rent.€ÌÌà ` àAs€to€failure€to€report,€the€appellant€testified€that€he€knew€he€was€in€violation€for€notÏentering€a€halfway€house€and€was€too€scared€to€report.€€The€appellant€admitted€he€wasÏarrested€in€November,€1997,€for€public€intoxication€and€resisting€arrest.€€This€incident€aroseÐ p5À04 Ðover€an€argument€with€his€ññœññmother„in„law.ññ€ññññ›ññ€As€to€the€theft€of€his€motherððs€car,€the€appellantÏtestified€he€was€drinking,€got€the€car€keys€from€his€mother,€went€looking€for€his€wife,Ïblacked€out€and€wrecked€the€car,€overturning€it€three€times.€€The€appellant€testified€he€isÏan€alcoholic€and€cannot€control€his€drinking,€although€he€attempted€treatment€in€1993.€ÏDuring€the€appellantððs€many€arrests,€he€has€never€been€sober.€ÌÌà ` àIn€revoking€the€appellantððs€probation,€the€trial€court€found€clear€evidence€that€theÏappellant€violated€the€terms€of€probation.€€The€trial€court€found€the€appellant€continued€toÏengage€in€the€same€criminal€activity€since€October,€1996,€the€original€probation€term.€€InÏcommenting€on€the€appellantððs€prior€revocations,€the€trial€court€held,€ð ðThereððs€no€questionÏthat€alcohol€is€a€problem€in€Mr.€Gredigððs€life,€but€the€other€problem€is€that€nothing€can€beÏdone€about€that€if€he€wonððt€cooperate€and€keeps€violating€the€law.€€And€thatððs€what€heÏdoes.ðð€ÌÌà ` àWe€find€there€is€substantial€evidence€in€this€record€to€support€the€trial€courtððsÏrevocation€of€the€appellantððs€probation.€€There€is€no€merit€to€this€issue.ÌÌÓ  Óò òB.€Ð $à" ÐAlternative€SentenceÌÌó óÓ  Óà ` àThe€appellant€contends€the€trial€court€was€in€error€for€not€considering€an€alternativeÐ 0*€%( Ðsentence,€such€as€community€corrections€program€or€split€confinement.€Further,€theÏappellant€contends€the€trial€court€made€no€findings€regarding€the€suitability€of€alternativeÏsentencing.€€The€state€does€not€specifically€address€this€issue€in€its€brief.ÌÌà ` àThe€dilemma€in€this€cause,€as€to€this€issue,€is€the€record€of€the€revocationÏproceedings€does€not€reflect€that€the€issue€to€the€appropriateness€of€an€alternativeÏsentence€was€ever€addressed€to€the€trial€court.€€The€record€does€not€contain€argumentsÏof€the€parties€as€to€whether€the€trial€court€should€consider€such€remedy,€nor€does€the€trialÐ 09€48 Ðcourt€address€any€question€of€the€viability€of€an€alternative€sentence€in€its€ruling.€€Thus,€thisÏissue€has€been€waived€by€the€appellant.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€27€(a)(7);€òòState€v.€David€ññœññGlenñ ñnñ ñññ›ññññññÐ pÀ ÐHaynes,€óóNo.€03C01„9602„CC„00075,€ññœññññ1998€WL€125560€ññ(Tenn.ññ›ññññññ€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,Ð P   ÐMarch€23,€1998).€ÌÌà ` àThe€trial€courtððs€judgment€is€affirmed.ÌÌÔ‡ XÕêXX X¯_ÔÓÓà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à________________________________________Ð ° Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àL.€T.€LAFFERTY,€SENIOR€JUDGEÌÌññœññññ̛Р b² Ðññññ›ññññññÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌJERRY€L.€SMITH,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌ___________________________________Ô#† X¯_XX XÕêp@#ÔÐ ^® ÐTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌòòÌóóÌññœññÌ