ÿWPC_  â»D÷»ce>N’íOösž›EèUªSsz«ç€ÙR¹íÍÝ(º~nÉ_-K«ðHBœõŒúÄðõ>W¸ð2E»ÔÈ€"I^Lï(ozœ¤=-ƒI×›YY¿R“ȯòC§C(>ÀhÎ5‡ºÕC r½Œë<%ýíX±×ŸM¶·jÌ­¢•wÁjú㪃¿ƒnË‚ñ™È±]íe E–0@Ç‚/µ£<´i:iT¡ÞPâc¹K>ý&Ôµc­mÒ% žFqV'wËžH™©þñÏ’<“ê³Oªy;Ÿ“pØb0ã“ó3«ƒ‡Ô…üx§¡¤ûɯBv® pjX?¯…2Rù¯&`d\õ^¢7¹Ëóº)ù<­UáYÀ÷'KÂs‘üâÀYþ(wå3c–îd²-ÙÑï1î„Ìê›þcYD?ºÉ¹åþ÷»ò|ú¼’Zï?‡Õoú|$Cáq"$¤gD?EÜýÉÕa£SâÞ·ûia~/¹ÓS!“j]ÿWE­ÓcÐ{sx+\ Îά>íÜ ’O纩e  ~åÍÊ1Èf®&®|\·øþs¢ ßéh‘ñU6¬a üNÉJ'I†™æË;šÏ*vužŒ¥¤Ik’×s÷ta#!NUNo %½ 0(ÃU:ëb% w- 41 E "T Nv ^ x „ m† † U U:ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò AQ, Æ} 0DC 0D‡ 0DË Ë D3 BB ˜HP LaserJet 8000 DN PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡,Ù¹6 AZ‹"Arial Regular- ù-tpO'3|xkidnappingzd'L ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ KÝ ƒ[¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€XÒÀXXXÔÔ€¢[XXÒÀÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€XÒÀX¢[ÔÐ  ÐÌÔ_ÔOcotberÔ_Ô€19,€1999ÌÌCecil€Ô_ÔCrowsonÔ_Ô,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAxÔó ó,Ù¹6 AZ‹"Arial RegularZ[\]_Cþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó````'ÿÿdxd dÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÑ` °ÑÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€Šô‹XXÔÔ€ŠêÅ‹‹ŠôÔÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ€ÑÑ8€57XXdìdÈ8ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÓ  Óò òÔ_ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÐ `  ÐÌßx€Y_B2.jz´ÿ­`  `€€@ÿEÔ ` 8ttxP d ð ­ xßAT€JACKSONÌÌMAY€SESSION,€1999ÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à À àà  à)à p àC.C.A.€NO.€02C01„9804„CC„00118Ð p Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àó óÐ r  Ðà ` àà ¸ àAppellee,ò òà h àà À àà  à)€€€€€Ð t  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àHARDEMAN€COUNTYÐ v  ÐV.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)€€€€€Ð x  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àHON.€JON€KERRY€BLACKWOOD,€Ð z  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àJUDGE€Ð | ÐALVIN€A.€HARRIS,€à h àà À àà  à)€€€€€ó óÐ ~ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àò òà  à)à p àó óÐ €  Ðà ` àà ¸ àAppellant.à h àà À àò òà  à)à p à(AGGRAVATED€ROBBERY)€Ð ‚" Ðó óÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à À àà  àà p àòòà È àFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:Ð x ÐÌò òJEANNIE€KAESSà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àPAUL€G.€SUMMERS€Ð p  Ðó ó520€Ridgeway€Drive€€à h àà À àà  àà p àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÐ r! ÐBolivar,€TN€38008Ìà ` àà ¸ àò òà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àPETER€M.€COUGHLANÐ j#  Ðó óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÐ l$  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à2nd€Floor,€Cordell€Hull€BuildingÌò òà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àó óà À àà  àà p à425€Fifth€Avenue€North€Ð d& Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àNashville,€TN€€37243ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òELIZABETH€T.€RICEÐ X)ø  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àó óDistrict€Attorney€General€Ð Z*ú ! ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òJERRY€W.€NORWOOD€Ð R,ò"# Ðó óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÐ T-ô#$ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à302€E.€Market€StreetÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àSomerville,€TN€38068€ÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED€________________________ÌÌAFFIRMED€ÌÌTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGEÐ  $9Ä/0ø ÐÓ  ÓÔ€°oÌ°‹ŠêÅÔò òòòOPINIONóóó óÔ€ŠêÅ‹°°oÌÔÐ `  ÐÓ  ÓÌÓÓÌà ` àOn€September€2,€1997,€the€Hardeman€County€Grand€Jury€indicted€AppellantÐ ´ ÐAlvin€A.€Harris€for€aggravated€robbery€and€aggravated€assault.€€After€a€jury€trial€onÐ ¤ ÐJanuary€9,€1998,€Appellant€was€convicted€of€aggravated€robbery€and€facilitation€ofÐ ô” Ðaggravated€assault.€€On€January€29,€1998,€the€trial€court€sentenced€Appellant€as€aÐ ä„  ÐRange€I€standard€offender€to€concurrent€€terms€of€eight€years€for€aggravated€robberyÐ Ôt  Ðand€two€years€for€facilitation€of€aggravated€assault.€€Appellant€challenges€hisÐ Äd Ðconvictions,€raising€the€following€issues:Ð ´T ÐÓÓà0 ` à1)€whether€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€when€it€allowed€the€State€toÐ ¤D Ðintroduce€a€photograph€into€evidence;Ðœ<` €%` €% ÐÌà0 ` à2)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€ruled€that€certain€out€of€courtÐ Œ, Ðstatements€were€inadmissible;Є$` €%` €% ÐÌà0 ` à3)€whether€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€when€it€denied€AppellantððsÐ t! Ðrequest€for€access€to€a€tape€recording€of€a€plea€hearing€in€juvenile€court;Ðl" ` €%` €% ÐÌà0 ` à4)€whether€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€when€it€denied€AppellantððsÐ \$ü Ðrequest€to€obtain€a€copy€of€a€petition€and€order€from€juvenile€court;€ÐT%ô` €%` €% ÐÌà0 ` à5)€whether€the€trial€courtððs€refusal€to€grant€Appellantððs€request€for€access€toÐ D'ä Ðrecords€from€juvenile€court€prevented€him€from€having€a€fair€trial;€andÐ<(Ü` €%` €% ÐÌà0 ` à6)€whether€the€evidence€was€sufficient€to€support€Appellantððs€convictions€forÐ ,*Ì ! Ðaggravated€robbery€and€facilitation€of€aggravated€assault.Ð$+Ä!"` €%` €% ÐÌÓÓAfter€a€review€of€the€record,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð -´#$ ÐÌà@dd+Dàò òI.€€FACTSó óˆÐ ô0”'( ÐÌà ` àWilliam€Haas€testified€that€when€he€parked€his€truck€in€front€of€the€GrandÐ Ô4t+, Ðâ âJunction€Pharmacy€on€July€11,€1997,€he€noticed€a€black€Dodge€pickup€that€was€Ð Ä6d-. Ðparked€nearby.€€Haas€also€observed€that€there€were€two€black€males€in€the€truck€andÐ `  Ðâ âthe€male€sitting€in€the€passengerððs€seat€was€wearing€a€baseball€cap.€€Haas€€thenÐ P ð Ðentered€the€pharmacy€and€got€his€prescription€filled.€€When€Haas€left€the€pharmacyÐ @ à Ðfifteen€minutes€later,€the€black€truck€was€still€there.€€Haas€was€not€able€to€identify€theÐ 0Ð Ðtwo€occupants€of€the€black€truck.Ð  À ÐÌà ` àJoney€Buntyn,€Appellantððs€cousin,€testified€that€when€she€drove€by€the€GrandÐ    ÐJunction€Pharmacy,€she€saw€a€black€pickup€truck€with€red€letters€on€it€parked€in€frontÐ ð  Ðof€the€pharmacy.€€Buntyn€also€saw€that€Appellant€was€sitting€in€the€driverððs€seat€ofÐ à€ Ðthe€truck€and€Marlon€ð ðTonyðð€Embrey€was€standing€on€the€steps€of€the€pharmacy.€€Ð Ðp ÐIn€addition,€Buntyn€saw€Appellant€wave€to€her€when€she€drove€by.€€Buntyn€alsoÐ À` Ðtestified€that€she€knew€that€the€black€truck€was€owned€by€Embreyððs€father.€€Ð °P ÐÌà ` àLucy€Gaston€testified€that€on€July€11,€1997,€she€was€working€as€a€clerk€in€theÐ "0 Ðpharmacy.€€While€Gaston€was€waiting€on€a€customer€at€approximately€11:20€a.m.,Ð €$  Ðshe€looked€up€and€saw€a€young€black€male€pointing€a€pistol€at€her€head.€€The€youngÐ p& Ðmale€then€stated,€ð ðGive€me€your€money,ðð€and€Gaston€complied€by€giving€him€$150Ð `(  Ðfrom€the€cash€register.€€Shortly€thereafter,€the€robber€left€the€pharmacy.€€GastonÐ P*ð " Ðcould€not€identify€the€robber€because€he€was€wearing€a€mask€during€the€robbery.Ð @,à"$ ÐÌà ` àRobert€Horton€testified€that€he€was€also€working€at€the€pharmacy€on€July€11,Ð  0À&( Ð1997.€€At€approximately€11:30€a.m.,€Horton€saw€a€young€black€male€who€wasÐ 2°(* Ðholding€a€gun€enter€the€pharmacy.€€The€robber€then€pointed€his€gun€at€Horton€andÐ 4 *, ÐGaston,€walked€up€to€the€cash€register,€and€demanded€that€Gaston€give€him€theÐ ð5,. Ðâ âmoney.€€After€the€robber€took€the€money€and€left€the€pharmacy,€Horton€walked€to€the€Ð à7€.0 Ðfront€of€the€pharmacy€and€looked€out€the€window.€€Horton€believed€that€the€robberÐ `  Ðâ âhad€gone€to€the€back€of€the€store€because€he€could€not€see€the€robber€and€he€couldÐ P ð Ðnot€see€any€vehicles.Ð @ à ÐÌà ` àHorton€also€testified€that€he€could€not€identify€the€robber€who€came€in€theÐ  À Ðpharmacy€because€he€was€wearing€a€bandana€over€his€face€and€he€was€alsoÐ °  Ðwearing€sunglasses€and€a€baseball€cap.€€€€Ð    ÐÌà ` àMechelle€Ramey€testified€that€she€lives€in€a€house€that€is€directly€behind€theÐ à€ ÐGrand€Junction€Pharmacy.€€Ramey€testified€that€when€she€was€driving€to€her€homeÐ Ðp Ðat€approximately€11:30€a.m.€on€July€11,€1997,€she€saw€that€there€was€a€young€blackÐ À` Ðmale€who€was€wearing€a€baseball€cap€standing€on€her€porch.€€Ramey€becameÐ °P Ðfrightened€and€decided€to€drive€past€her€house€instead€of€stopping.€€At€this€point,Ð   @ ÐRamey€saw€the€young€black€male€leave€her€property€and€she€decided€to€follow€him.€Ð "0 ÐRamey€subsequently€saw€the€black€male€run€to€a€church€parking€lot€and€get€into€theÐ €$  Ðpassengerððs€seat€of€a€black€Dodge€pickup€truck€that€had€red€letters€on€it.€€ShortlyÐ p& Ðthereafter,€Ramey€saw€the€black€pickup€turn€around€and€drive€away.Ð `(  ÐÌà ` àChief€Thomas€Graves€of€the€Grand€Junction€Police€Department€testified€thatÐ @,à"$ Ðhe€investigated€the€robbery€at€the€Grand€Junction€Pharmacy.€€Graves€testified€thatÐ 0.Ð$& Ðhe€interviewed€Appellant€on€July€11,€1997,€and€Appellant€denied€that€he€had€anyÐ  0À&( Ðknowledge€of€the€robbery.Ð 2°(* ÐÌà ` àChief€Graves€testified€that€on€July€18,€1997,€Appellant€gave€a€statement€afterÐ ð5,. Ðhe€signed€a€waiver€of€rights€form.€€The€written€statement€contains€the€followingÐ à7€.0 Ðcolloquy:Ð Ð9p02 ÐÓÓà0 ` àà ¸ à[Graves]:€On€July€11„1997€did€you€robb€[sic]€Grand€Jct.€Pharmacyð"ðÐ` ` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Appellant]:€I€did€not€rob€nothing.ÐX ø` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Graves]:€Were€you€with€anyone€that€robbed€the€Grand€Jct.€PharmacyÐ P ð Ðon€July€11„1997.ÐH è` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Appellant]:€Yes€sir.Ð@ à` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Graves]:€Who€were€you€with.Ð8Ø` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Appellant]:€Tony€Embry.Ð0Ð` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Graves]:€Who€went€in€the€drug€store.Ð(È` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Appellant]:€Tony€Embry.Ð À` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Graves]:€What€did€you€do€when€Tony€Embry€went€in€drug€store.и ` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Appellant]:€I€drove€the€truck€a€Dodge€Ram€pickup€around€back€behindÐ °  Ða€church€behind€basketball€goal.Ш ` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Graves]:€After€the€robbery€where€did€you€go.Р ` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Appellant]:€I€drove€the€truck€to€Tony€Embry€house€and€I€went€to€townð"ðÐø˜ ` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Graves]:€What€kind€of€gun€was€used€in€robbery.Ðð ` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Appellant]:€38€pistol.Ðèˆ` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Graves]:€Where€is€the€pistol€now.Ðà€` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Appellant]:€I€donððt€know,€thatððs€his€stuffð"ðÐØx` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Graves]:€Whoððs€[sic]€idea€was€it€to€rob€the€drug€store.ÐÐp` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Appellant]:€Tom€[sic]€Embry.ÐÈh` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Graves]:€What€did€he€say€when€he€picked€you€up€that€morning.ÐÀ`` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Appellant]:€Letððs€go€to€the€store€and€we€went€to€drug€store.иX` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Graves]:€What€time€of€day€did€he,€Tony€Embry€pick€you€upð"ðаP` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Appellant]:€About€10€AM€or€11€AM€on€July€11„1997.ШH` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Graves]:€Did€you€get€any€of€the€moneyð"ðР @` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Appellant]:€Man€noð"ðИ!8` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà0¸ ` €%` €%àà0¸ €%¸ €%à.€.€.€.Ð"0€%€% Ðà0 ` àà0¸ ` €%` €%à[Graves]:€Anything€you€want€to€take€away€from€this€statementð"ðЈ#(¸ €%¸ €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à[Appellant]:€No€sir.€€I€lied€the€first€timeð"ðÓÓЀ$ ` €%` €% ÐÌà@ Dàò òII.€€ADMISSION€OF€A€PHOTOGRAPHó óˆÐ `(  ÐÌà ` àAppellant€contends€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€when€it€allowed€theÐ @,à"$ ÐState€to€introduce€a€photograph€of€the€pharmacy€into€evidence.€€Specifically,Ð 0.Ð$& ÐAppellant€contends€that€the€photograph€should€have€been€excluded€because€theÐ  0À&( ÐState€failed€to€comply€with€the€discovery€rules€and€because€the€probative€value€ofÐ 2°(* Ðthe€photograph€was€outweighed€by€its€prejudicial€effect.Ð 4 *, ÐÌà@˜˜)Dàò òA.€€Discoveryó óˆÐ à7€.0 ÐÐ Ð9p02 Ðà ` àAppellant€contends€that€the€photograph€should€have€been€excluded€becauseÐ `  Ðthe€State€failed€to€comply€with€Rule€16(1)(C)€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€CriminalÐ P ð ÐProcedure.€€Rule€16(1)(C)€provides:Ð @ à ÐÓÓà0 ` àUpon€request€of€the€defendant,€the€state€shall€permit€the€defendant€to€inspectÐ 0Ð Ðand€copy€or€photograph€books,€papers,€documents,€photographs,€tangibleÐ (È Ðobjects,€buildings€or€places,€or€copies€or€portions€thereof,€which€are€within€theÐ  À Ðpossession,€custody€or€control€of€the€state,€and€which€are€material€to€theÐ ¸  Ðpreparation€of€the€defendant's€defense€or€are€intended€for€use€by€the€state€asÐ °  Ðevidence€in€chief€at€the€trial,€or€were€obtained€from€or€belong€to€the€defendant.ÓI9ÓШ ` €%` €% ÐAppellant€argues€that€Rule€16(1)(C)€was€violated€because€the€State€did€not€show€theÐ ø˜  Ðphotograph€to€the€defense€until€morning€of€trial€on€January€9,€1998,€even€though€theÐ èˆ Ðtrial€court€issued€€an€order€on€September€3,€1997,€that€required€the€State€to€complyÐ Øx Ðwith€the€discovery€rules€and€Appellant€filed€a€formal€request€for€discovery€onÐ Èh ÐOctober€17,€1997.Ð ¸X ÐÌà ` àThe€record€indicates€that€the€photograph€was€taken€by€Chief€Graves€on€theÐ ˜!8 Ðmorning€of€trial.€€Clearly,€the€State€could€not€have€shown€the€photograph€toÐ ˆ#( ÐAppellant€before€the€day€of€trial€because€the€photograph€did€not€exist€before€thatÐ x% Ðtime.€€Because€Rule€16(1)(C)€only€applies€to€documents€and€tangible€objects€thatÐ h' Ðare€ð ðwithin€the€possession,€custody€or€control€of€the€state,ðð€Rule€16(1)(C)€was€notÐ X)ø! Ðviolated€in€this€case.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€òòState€v.€Hutchisonóó,€898€S.W.2d€161,€167ð!ð68€(Tenn.Ð H+è!# Ð1994)€(holding€that€where€the€State€did€not€have€certain€documents€in€its€control€untilÐ 8-Ø#% Ðthe€middle€of€the€trial,€introduction€of€the€documents€did€not€violate€Rule€16).€Ð (/È%' ÐAppellant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€this€issue.Ð 1¸') ÐÌà@¶¶)Dàò òB.€€Prejudiceó óˆÐ ø4˜+- Ðâ âÐ è6ˆ-/ Ðà ` àAppellant€also€contends€that€the€photograph€should€have€been€excludedÐ `  Ðâ âunder€Rule€403€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Evidence.€€Rule€403€provides:Ð P ð ÐÓÓà0 ` àAlthough€relevant,€evidence€may€be€excluded€if€its€probative€value€isÐ @ à Ðsubstantially€outweighed€by€the€danger€of€unfair€prejudice,€confusion€of€theÐ 8Ø Ðissues,€or€misleading€the€jury,€or€by€considerations€of€undue€delay,€waste€ofÐ 0Ð Ðtime,€or€needless€presentation€of€cumulative€evidence.ÓÓÐ(È` €%` €% ÐÌà ` àAppellant€argues€that€the€photograph€of€the€pharmacy€has€no€probative€valueÐ ¨  Ðbecause€it€was€taken€from€an€angle€and€thus,€it€does€not€clearly€show€the€street€inÐ ø˜  Ðfront€of€the€pharmacy€where€the€black€pickup€was€parked.€€Despite€AppellantððsÐ èˆ Ðcontention,€the€photograph€has€obvious€probative€value.€€Horton€used€theÐ Øx Ðphotograph€to€aid€his€description€about€seeing€the€robber€exit€the€pharmacy€and€turnÐ Èh Ðleft.€€Haas€used€the€photograph€to€explain€where€his€truck€and€the€black€pickup€truckÐ ¸X Ðwere€parked.€€In€addition,€Chief€Graves€used€the€photograph€to€aid€his€descriptionÐ ¨H Ðof€the€land€and€other€buildings€that€were€next€to€the€pharmacy.€€Thus,€theÐ ˜!8 Ðphotograph€of€the€pharmacy€was€clearly€probative.Ð ˆ#( ÐÌà ` àAppellant€argues€that€the€photograph€was€unfairly€prejudicial€because€it€wasÐ h' Ðtaken€at€an€angle€that€makes€the€street€in€front€of€the€store€appear€to€be€wider€thanÐ X)ø! Ðit€actually€is.€€However,€Horton€testified€that€the€photograph€was€an€accurateÐ H+è!# Ðdepiction€of€the€pharmacy.€€In€addition,€Horton€testified€that€the€street€in€front€of€theÐ 8-Ø#% Ðpharmacy€is€approximately€twenty„five€to€thirty€feet€wide€and€the€street€becomesÐ (/È%' Ðwider€as€it€approaches€the€area€where€the€photograph€was€taken.€€We€simply€cannotÐ 1¸') Ðsee€how€this€photograph€was€unfairly€prejudicial.€€Indeed,€it€appears€that€AppellantððsÐ 3¨)+ Ðmain€complaint€is€that€the€State€introduced€this€photograph€that€was€taken€at€anÐ ø4˜+- Ðangle€rather€than€a€photograph€that€was€taken€from€directly€in€front€of€the€pharmacy.€Ð è6ˆ-/ ÐAs€long€as€a€proper€foundation€is€presented€for€admission€of€a€photograph€intoÐ Ø8x/1 Ðevidence,€a€defendant€cannot€complain€successfully€that€the€photograph€isÐ `  Ðinadmissible€simply€because€a€ð ðbetter€pictureðð€would€have€been€more€helpful€to€theÐ P ð Ðdefendantððs€theory€of€the€case.Ð @ à ÐÌà ` àð ðThe€admission€of€evidence€is€largely€discretionary€with€the€trial€judge,€and€herÐ  À Ðdiscretion€will€not€be€disturbed€on€appeal€unless€there€is€clearly€an€abuse€of€thatÐ °  Ðdiscretion.ðð€€òòState€v.€Grayóó,€960€S.W.2d€598,€606€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).€€In€thisÐ    Ðcase,€we€see€no€reason€to€disturb€the€trial€courtððs€ruling.€€Appellant€is€not€entitled€toÐ ð  Ðrelief€on€this€issue.Ð à€ ÐÌà@``!Dàò òIII.€€OUT€OF€COURT€STATEMENTSó óˆÐ À` ÐÌà ` àAppellant€contends€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€when€it€ruled€thatÐ   @ Ðcertain€out€of€court€statements€made€by€Embrey€were€inadmissible€hearsay.€Ð "0 ÐSpecifically,€Appellant€contends€that€the€statements€Embrey€made€to€police€andÐ €$  Ðmade€during€a€juvenile€plea€hearing€were€admissible€as€admissions€of€a€partyÐ p& Ðopponent€under€Rule€803(1.2)€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Evidence.€€Rule€803(1.2)Ð `(  Ðprovides:Ð P*ð " ÐÓÓà0 ` àThe€following€are€not€excluded€by€the€hearsay€rule:Ð@,à"$` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà0¸ ` €%` €%àAdmission€by€Party-Opponent€-€A€statement€offered€against€a€party€thatÐ 8-Ø#% Ðis€.€.€.€(B)€a€statement€in€which€the€party€has€manifested€an€adoption€orÐ 0.Ð$& Ðbelief€in€its€truth€.€.€.€An€admission€is€not€excluded€merely€because€theÐ (/È%' Ðstatement€is€in€the€form€of€an€opinion.€Statements€admissible€under€thisÐ  0À&( Ðexception€are€not€conclusive.Ð1¸')¸ €%¸ €% ÐÌÓÓAppellant€argues€that€the€State€adopted€any€statements€that€Embrey€made€to€policeÐ 3¨)+ Ðor€made€during€his€juvenile€plea€hearing€when€the€State€accepted€his€guilty€plea.Ð ø4˜+- Ðâ âÐ è6ˆ-/ Ðà ` àAppellant€has€cited€no€authority€for€his€unique€proposition€that€the€StateÐ `  Ðâ âadopts€a€defendantððs€statements€whenever€that€defendant€pleads€guilty€to€theÐ P ð Ðcommission€of€a€crime.€€Indeed,€we€reject€this€proposition.€€Presumably,€whenÐ @ à Ðdefense€counsel€attempted€to€question€the€State€witnesses€about€what€Embrey€hadÐ 0Ð Ðsaid€during€his€interview€with€police€and€during€the€juvenile€plea€hearing,€counselÐ  À Ðwas€hoping€the€witnesses€would€say€that€Embrey€claimed€that€Appellant€had€noÐ °  Ðknowledge€that€Embrey€was€going€to€rob€the€pharmacy.€€Besides€the€fact€that€thereÐ    Ðis€no€proof€in€the€record€that€Embrey€ever€made€such€a€statement,€there€isÐ ð  Ðabsolutely€no€proof€in€the€record€that€the€State€ever€manifested€a€belief€that€such€aÐ à€ Ðstatement€was€true.€€In€short,€there€is€no€evidence€that€the€State€ever€adopted€anyÐ Ðp Ðstatement€of€Embrey€as€its€own.€€Thus,€Embreyððs€statements€were€not€admissibleÐ À` Ðas€the€statements€of€a€party€opponent.€€Appellant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€thisÐ °P Ðissue.Ð   @ ÐÌà@îîDàò òIV.€€TAPE€RECORDING€OF€A€PLEA€HEARING€IN€JUVENILE€COURTó óˆÐ €$  ÐÌà ` àAppellant€contends€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€when€it€failed€toÐ `(  Ðgrant€his€request€for€access€to€a€tape€recording€of€Embreyððs€plea€hearing€in€juvenileÐ P*ð " Ðcourt.Ð @,à"$ ÐÌà ` àThe€record€indicates€that€only€two€days€before€trial,€Appellant€filed€a€motionÐ  0À&( Ðin€which€he€asked€the€trial€court€to€authorize€him€to€listen€to€a€tape€recording€ofÐ 2°(* ÐEmbreyððs€plea€hearing€in€juvenile€court.€€During€a€hearing€held€the€day€before€trial,Ð 4 *, Ðthe€trial€court€denied€the€motion.€€The€trial€court€found€that€under€Tennessee€CodeÐ ð5,. Ðâ âAnnotated€section€37„1„153,€the€tape€recording€was€a€confidential€record€and€itsÐ à7€.0 Ðinspection€could€only€be€authorized€by€the€juvenile€court.€€Section€37„1„153Ð `  Ðprovides,€in€relevant€part:Ð P ð Ðâ âÓÓà0 ` àExcept€in€cases€arising€under€ðð€37-1-146,€all€files€and€records€of€the€court€inÐ @ à Ða€proceeding€under€this€part€are€open€to€inspection€only€by:€€Ð8Ø` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà0¸ ` €%` €%à(1)€The€judge,€officers€and€professional€staff€of€the€court;€€Ð0и €%¸ €% Ðà0 ` àà0¸ ` €%` €%à(2)€The€parties€to€the€proceeding€and€their€counsel€and€representatives;€Ð (È Ð(3)€A€public€or€private€agency€or€institution€providing€supervision€orÐ  À Ðhaving€custody€of€the€child€under€order€of€the€court;€€Ð¸ ¸ €%¸ €% Ðà0 ` àà0¸ ` €%` €%à(4)€A€court€and€its€probation€and€other€officials€or€professional€staff€andÐ °  Ðthe€attorney€for€the€defendant€for€use€in€preparing€a€presentence€reportÐ ¨  Ðin€a€criminal€case€in€which€the€defendant€is€convicted€and€who€priorÐ    Ðthereto€had€been€a€party€to€the€proceeding€in€juvenile€court;€and€€Ðø˜ ¸ €%¸ €% Ðà0 ` àà0¸ ` €%` €%à(5)€With€permission€of€the€court€any€other€person€or€agency€orÐ ð  Ðinstitution€having€a€legitimate€interest€in€the€proceeding€or€in€the€workÐ èˆ Ðof€the€court.€€Ðà€¸ €%¸ €% ÐÌÓÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€37„1„153(a)€(1996).Ð Ðp ÐÌà@'Dàò òA.€€Applicabilityó óˆÐ °P ÐÌà ` àInitially,€Appellant€contends€that€the€trial€court€should€have€granted€his€motionÐ "0 Ðbecause€the€Legislature€did€not€intend€for€section€37„1„153(a)€to€apply€to€recordsÐ €$  Ðsuch€as€tape€recordings€of€juvenile€plea€hearings.€€However,€section€37„1„153(a)Ð p& Ðexpressly€states€that€its€confidentiality€provisions€apply€to€ð ðall€files€and€records€of€theÐ `(  Ðcourt€in€a€proceeding€under€this€part.ðð€€Thus,€it€is€clear€that€the€Legislature€intendedÐ P*ð " Ðfor€section€27„1„153(a)€to€apply€to€all€records€of€juvenile€court€proceedings,€includingÐ @,à"$ Ðplea€hearings.€€Appellant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€this€issue.Ð 0.Ð$& ÐÌà@88'Dàò òB.€€Jurisdictionó óˆÐ 2°(* ÐÌà ` àAppellant€also€contends€that€the€trial€court€should€have€granted€his€motionÐ ð5,. Ðbecause€the€trial€court€has€jurisdiction€to€order€the€release€of€juvenile€court€recordsÐ à7€.0 Ðto€any€person€with€a€ð ðlegitimate€interestðð€in€the€proceeding.Ð Ð9p02 Їà ` àRegardless€of€whether€Appellant€was€a€person€with€a€ð ðlegitimate€interestðð€inÐ `  ÐEmbreyððs€plea€hearing,€we€conclude€that€the€trial€court€correctly€ruled€that€it€did€notÐ P ð Ðhave€jurisdiction€to€grant€access€to€the€tape€recording.€€Subsection€37„1„153(a)(5)Ð @ à Ðstates€that€ð ðall€files€and€records€of€the€court€in€a€proceeding€under€this€part€are€openÐ 0Ð Ðto€inspection€only€.€.€.€[w]ith€permission€of€the€court€any€other€person€or€agency€orÐ  À Ðinstitution€having€legitimate€interest€in€the€proceeding€or€in€the€work€of€the€court.ðð€Ð °  ÐAlthough€not€expressly€stated,€the€clear€implication€of€this€subsection€is€that€theÐ    Ðð ðcourtðð€that€must€grant€permission€to€view€the€records€or€files€is€the€ð ðjuvenile€courtðð.€Ð ð  ÐThus,€we€conclude€that€the€trial€court€was€correct€when€it€ruled€that€it€did€not€haveÐ à€ Ðjurisdiction€to€grant€access€to€the€tape€recording.€€Appellant€is€not€entitled€to€reliefÐ Ðp Ðon€this€issue.Ð À` ÐÌà@hh)Dàò òC.€€Mandamusó óˆÐ   @ ÐÌà ` àAppellant€contends€that€as€an€appellate€court€over€the€juvenile€court,€theÐ €$  Ðcircuit€court€should€have€issued€a€writ€of€mandamus€that€ordered€the€juvenile€courtÐ p& Ðto€produce€the€tape€recording€for€inspection€by€Appellant.Ð `(  ÐÌà ` àA€writ€of€mandamus€is€"a€summary€remedy,€extraordinary€in€its€nature."Ð @,à"$ ÐòòPeerless€Constr.€Co.€v.€Bassóó,€158€Tenn.€518,€522,€14€S.W.2d€732,€733€(1929).€Ð 0.Ð$& ÐIndeed,€the€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€has€stated:€€Ð  0À&( ÐÓÓà0 ` àMandamus€generally€will€not€be€issued€if€the€petitioner€has€a€legal€remedyÐ 2°(* Ðthat€is€equally€convenient,€complete,€beneficial,€and€effective,€but€the€remedyÐ 3¨)+ Ðwhich€would€preclude€mandamus€must€be€equally€as€convenient,€complete,Ð 4 *, Ðbeneficial,€and€effective€as€mandamus,€and€must€also€be€sufficiently€speedyÐ ø4˜+- Ðto€prevent€material€injury.€Although€the€writ€is€more€often€addressed€toÐ ð5,. Ðministerial€acts,€rather€than€discretionary€acts,€the€writ€may€be€addressed€toÐ è6ˆ-/ Ðdiscretionary€acts€when€the€act€is€done€in€an€"arbitrary€and€oppressiveÐ à7€.0 Ðmanner"€or€where€there€has€been€a€"plainly€palpable"€abuse€of€discretion.ÐØ8x/1` €%` €% ÐÐ Ð9p02 ÐòòÓÓMeighan€v.€U.S.€Sprint€Communications€Co.óó€,€942€S.W.2d€476,€479€(Tenn.€1997)Ð `  Ð(internal€quotations€omitted).Ð P ð ÐÌà ` àWe€conclude€that€it€would€have€been€improper€for€the€trial€court€to€issue€a€writÐ 0Ð Ðof€mandamus€in€this€case€because€Appellant€had€ð ða€legal€remedy€that€[wa]s€equallyÐ  À Ðconvenient,€complete,€beneficial,€and€effective.ðð€€As€previously€stated,€the€properÐ °  Ðprocedure€for€obtaining€the€tape€recording€would€have€been€to€petition€the€juvenileÐ    Ðcourt€for€it.€€Although€there€is€nothing€in€the€record€that€explains€why€Appellant€failedÐ ð  Ðto€petition€the€juvenile€court€for€the€tape€recording,€Appellant€indicates€in€his€briefÐ à€ Ðthat€he€did€not€petition€the€juvenile€court€because€it€ð ðwould€cost€valuable€time€thatÐ Ðp Ðis€necessary€to€prepare€for€.€.€.€trial.ðð€€This€is€not€a€sufficient€basis€for€attempting€toÐ À` Ðbypass€the€juvenile€court.€€If€the€information€on€the€tape€recording€was€important,Ð °P ÐAppellant€should€have€petitioned€the€juvenile€court€for€the€tape€and€if€this€causedÐ   @ Ðdelay,€he€could€have€requested€a€continuance€from€the€trial€court.€€Appellant€is€notÐ "0 Ðentitled€to€relief€on€this€issue.Ð €$  ÐÌÌà@‚‚%Dàò òV.€€JUVENILE€PETITIONó óˆÐ P*ð " ÐÌà ` àAppellant€contends€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€when€it€failed€toÐ 0.Ð$& Ðgrant€his€request€for€permission€to€obtain€a€copy€of€the€juvenile€petition€and€orderÐ  0À&( Ðfinding€that€Embrey€had€committed€the€delinquent€act€of€aggravated€robbery.Ð 2°(* ÐÌà ` àThe€record€indicates€that€two€days€before€trial,€Appellant€filed€a€motion€inÐ ð5,. Ðwhich€he€asked€the€trial€court€to€give€him€permission€to€obtain€a€copy€of€the€juvenileÐ à7€.0 Ðpetition€and€order€finding€that€Embrey€had€committed€the€delinquent€act€ofÐ Ð9p02 Ðaggravated€robbery.€€During€a€hearing€held€the€day€before€trial,€the€trial€court€deniedÐ `  Ðthe€motion€after€it€found€that€it€did€not€have€jurisdiction€over€the€matter.Ð P ð ÐÌà ` àAppellant€contends€that€under€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€37„1„Ð 0Ð Ð153(b),€the€petition€and€order€are€not€confidential€and€he€was€entitled€to€view€them.€Ð  À ÐSection€37„1„553(b)€provides:Ð °  ÐÓÓà0 ` àNotwithstanding€the€provisions€of€subsection€(a),€petitions€and€orders€of€theÐ    Ðcourt€in€a€delinquency€proceeding€under€this€part€shall€be€opened€to€publicÐ ø˜  Ðinspection€and€their€content€subject€to€disclosure€to€the€public€if:€€Ðð ` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà0¸ ` €%` €%à(1)€The€juvenile€is€fourteen€(14)€or€more€years€of€age€at€the€time€of€theÐ èˆ Ðalleged€act;€and€€Ðà€¸ €%¸ €% Ðà0 ` àà0¸ ` €%` €%à(2)€The€conduct€constituting€the€delinquent€act,€if€committed€by€anÐ Øx Ðadult,€would€constitute€first€degree€murder,€second€degree€murder,Ð Ðp Ðrape,€aggravated€rape,€aggravated€robbery,€especially€aggravatedÐ Èh Ðrobbery,€kidnapping,€aggravated€kidnapping€or€especially€aggravatedÐ À` Ðkidnapping.€€Ð¸X¸ €%¸ €% ÐÌÓÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€37„1„153(b)€(1996).€€Appellant€argues€that€under€this€statute,€theÐ ¨H Ðpetition€and€order€were€not€confidential€because€Embrey€was€sixteen€years€old€atÐ ˜!8 Ðthe€time€of€the€delinquent€act€and€he€pled€guilty€to€a€delinquent€act€that€would€haveÐ ˆ#( Ðbeen€aggravated€robbery€if€committed€by€an€adult.Ð x% ÐÌà ` àWe€conclude€that€the€trial€court€was€correct€when€it€ruled€that€it€did€not€haveÐ X)ø! Ðthe€jurisdiction€to€grant€Appellantððs€motion.€€When€section€37„1„153(b)€is€consideredÐ H+è!# Ðin€context€with€section€37„1„153(a),€it€is€evident€that€even€though€a€petition€and€orderÐ 8-Ø#% Ðthat€meet€the€specified€requirements€may€be€public€records,€they€must€be€obtainedÐ (/È%' Ðfrom€the€juvenile€court.€€Indeed,€because€the€juvenile€court€is€the€court€that€hasÐ 1¸') Ðcontrol€over€these€records€and€because€the€juvenile€court€is€the€court€that€can€mostÐ 3¨)+ Ðeasily€determine€whether€the€specified€requirements€have€been€satisfied,€it€is€onlyÐ ø4˜+- Ðâ âlogical€that€a€defendant€should€petition€the€juvenile€court€in€order€to€view€the€recordsÐ è6ˆ-/ Ðor€subpoena€the€records€from€the€juvenile€court.€€Appellant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€onÐ `  Ðthis€issue.Ð P ð Ðâ âÌà@,,(Dàò òVI.€€FAIR€TRIALó óˆÐ 0Ð ÐÌà ` àAppellant€contends€that€the€trial€courtððs€refusal€to€grant€his€request€to€obtainÐ °  ÐEmbreyððs€juvenile€records€prevented€him€from€having€a€fair€trial.€€Specifically,Ð    ÐAppellant€contends€that€the€trial€courtððs€actions€deprived€him€of€a€fair€trial€becauseÐ ð  Ðhe€was€unable€to€call€Embrey€as€a€witness€without€the€assurance€that€he€couldÐ à€ Ðimpeach€Embrey€with€the€statements€he€made€during€the€juvenile€plea€hearing.Ð Ðp ÐÌà ` àAs€previously€stated,€if€the€records€of€Embreyððs€juvenile€plea€hearing€wereÐ °P Ðimportant,€Appellant€should€have€petitioned€the€juvenile€court€for€access€to€theÐ   @ Ðrecords.€€Any€detriment€that€resulted€from€not€having€access€to€Embreyððs€recordsÐ "0 Ðwas€clearly€the€product€of€Appellantððs€own€failure€to€follow€the€statutory€procedureÐ €$  Ðfor€obtaining€the€records.€€In€short,€the€trial€courtððs€actions€did€not€prevent€AppellantÐ p& Ðfrom€having€a€fair€trial.€€Appellant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€this€issue.Ð `(  ÐÌà@¦¦Dàò òVII.€€SUFFICIENCY€OF€THE€EVIDENCEó óˆÐ @,à"$ ÐÌà ` àAppellant€contends€that€the€evidence€was€insufficient€to€support€hisÐ  0À&( Ðconvictions€for€aggravated€robbery€and€facilitation€of€aggravated€assault.Ð 2°(* ÐÌà ` àWhen€an€appellant€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€this€Court€isÐ ð5,. Ðobliged€to€review€that€challenge€according€to€certain€well-settled€principles.€€A€verdictÐ à7€.0 Ðof€guilty€by€the€jury,€approved€by€the€trial€judge,€accredits€the€testimony€of€theÐ Ð9p02 ÐStateððs€witnesses€and€resolves€all€conflicts€in€the€testimony€in€favor€of€the€State.€Ð `  ÐòòState€v.€Cazesóó,€875€S.W.2d€253,€259€(Tenn.€1994).€€Although€an€accused€isÐ P ð Ðoriginally€cloaked€with€a€presumption€of€innocence,€a€jury€verdict€removes€thisÐ @ à Ðpresumption€and€replaces€it€with€one€of€guilt.€€òòState€v.€Tuggleóó,€639€S.W.2d€913,€914Ð 0Ð Ð(Tenn.€1982).€€Hence,€on€appeal,€the€burden€of€proof€rests€with€Appellant€toÐ  À Ðdemonstrate€the€insufficiency€of€the€convicting€evidence.€€òòId.óó€€On€appeal,€ð ðthe€[S]tateÐ °  Ðis€entitled€to€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€as€well€as€all€reasonableÐ    Ðand€legitimate€inferences€that€may€be€drawn€therefrom.ðð€€òòId.óó€€Where€the€sufficiencyÐ ð  Ðof€the€evidence€is€contested€on€appeal,€the€relevant€question€for€the€reviewing€courtÐ à€ Ðis€whether€any€rational€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€the€accused€guilty€of€everyÐ Ðp Ðelement€of€the€offense€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.Ð À` Ð307,€319,€99€S.Ct.€2781,€2789,€61€L.Ed.2d€560€(1979).€€In€conducting€our€evaluationÐ °P Ðof€the€convicting€evidence,€this€Court€is€precluded€from€reweighing€or€reconsideringÐ   @ Ðthe€evidence.€€òòState€v.€Morganóó,€929€S.W.2d€380,€383€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€Ð "0 ÐMoreover,€this€Court€may€not€substitute€its€own€inferences€ð ðfor€those€drawn€by€theÐ €$  Ðtrier€of€fact€from€circumstantial€evidence.ðð€€òòState€v.€Matthewsóó,€805€S.W.2d€776,€779Ð p& Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1990).€€Finally,€Rule€13(e)€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€AppellateÐ `(  ÐProcedure€provides,€ð ðfindings€of€guilt€in€criminal€actions€whether€by€the€trial€court€orÐ P*ð " Ðjury€shall€be€set€aside€if€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€support€the€findings€by€the€trierÐ @,à"$ Ðof€fact€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.ððÐ 0.Ð$& ÐÌà ` àUnder€Tennessee€law,€ð ð[r]obbery€is€the€intentional€or€knowing€theft€of€propertyÐ 2°(* Ðfrom€the€person€of€another€by€violence€or€putting€the€person€in€fear.ðð€€Tenn.€CodeÐ 4 *, ÐAnn.€ðð€39„13„401(a)€(1997).€€Further,€aggravated€robbery€is€a€robbery€which€isÐ ð5,. Ðð ð[a]ccomplished€with€a€deadly€weapon€or€by€display€of€any€article€used€or€fashionedÐ à7€.0 Ðto€lead€the€victim€to€reasonably€believe€it€to€be€a€deadly€weapon.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð Ð9p02 Ððð€39„13„402(a)(1)€(1997).€€In€addition,€ð ð[a]€person€is€criminally€responsible€for€anÐ `  Ðoffense€committed€by€the€conduct€of€another€if€.€.€.€[a]cting€with€intent€to€promote€orÐ P ð Ðassist€the€commission€of€the€offense,€or€to€benefit€in€the€proceeds€or€results€of€theÐ @ à Ðoffense,€the€person€solicits,€directs,€aids,€or€attempts€to€aid€another€person€toÐ 0Ð Ðcommit€the€offense.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„402(2)€(1997).€€Under€TennesseeÐ  À Ðlaw,€ð ð[a]€person€commits€assault€who:€.€.€.€[i]ntentionally€or€knowingly€causes€anotherÐ °  Ðto€reasonably€fear€imminent€bodily€injury.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„101(a)(2)Ð    Ð(1997).€€A€person€commits€aggravated€assault€when€the€person€intentionally€orÐ ð  Ðknowingly€commits€an€assault€by€using€or€displaying€a€deadly€weapon.€€Tenn.€CodeÐ à€ ÐAnn.€ðð€39„13„102(a)(1)(B)€(1997).€€In€addition,€ð ð[a]€person€is€criminally€responsibleÐ Ðp Ðfor€the€facilitation€of€a€felony€if,€knowing€that€another€intends€to€commit€a€specificÐ À` Ðfelony,€.€.€.€the€person€knowingly€furnishes€substantial€assistance€in€the€commissionÐ °P Ðof€the€felony.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„403(a)€(1997).€€Ð   @ ÐÌà ` àIn€this€case,€there€is€no€dispute€that€the€State€established€that€EmbreyÐ €$  Ðcommitted€the€offense€of€aggravated€robbery€by€taking€money€from€Gaston€whileÐ p& Ðpointing€a€gun€at€her€and€that€Embrey€committed€the€offense€of€aggravated€assaultÐ `(  Ðby€pointing€a€gun€at€Horton€and€putting€him€in€fear€for€his€safety.€€Essentially,€theÐ P*ð " Ðonly€dispute€is€whether€the€evidence€was€sufficient€to€establish€beyond€a€reasonableÐ @,à"$ Ðdoubt€that€Appellant€was€guilty€of€aggravated€robbery€because€he€was€criminallyÐ 0.Ð$& Ðresponsible€for€the€aggravated€robbery€committed€by€Embrey€and€that€Appellant€wasÐ  0À&( Ðguilty€of€the€facilitation€of€the€aggravated€assault€committed€by€Embrey.Ð 2°(* ÐÌà ` àAppellant€argues€that€the€evidence€was€insufficient€to€support€his€convictionsÐ ð5,. Ðbecause€the€State€failed€to€establish€that€he€knew€that€Embrey€was€planning€to€robÐ à7€.0 Ðthe€pharmacy€or€commit€an€assault€when€he€drove€Embrey€to€that€location.€Ð Ð9p02 ÐHowever,€we€conclude€that€when€the€evidence€is€viewed€in€the€light€most€favorableÐ `  Ðto€the€State,€the€evidence€was€sufficient€for€a€rational€jury€to€find€beyond€aÐ P ð Ðreasonable€doubt€that€Appellant€was€guilty€of€aggravated€robbery€and€facilitation€ofÐ @ à Ðaggravated€assault.€€Ð 0Ð ÐÌà ` àFirst,€we€conclude€that€when€the€evidence€is€viewed€in€the€light€most€favorableÐ °  Ðto€the€State,€the€evidence€clearly€established€that€Appellant€aided€EmbreyððsÐ    Ðcommission€of€the€aggravated€robbery€and€provided€substantial€assistance€in€theÐ ð  Ðcommission€of€the€aggravated€assault.€€It€is€undisputed€that€Appellant€drove€EmbreyÐ à€ Ðto€the€pharmacy€where€Embrey€committed€these€offenses€and€then€provided€aÐ Ðp Ðmeans€for€Embrey€to€escape€by€picking€him€up€in€the€church€parking€lot€and€drivingÐ À` Ðhim€home.Ð °P ÐÌà ` àSecond,€we€conclude€that€when€the€evidence€is€viewed€in€the€light€mostÐ "0 Ðfavorable€to€the€State,€the€evidence€was€sufficient€for€a€rational€jury€to€find€beyondÐ €$  Ða€reasonable€doubt€that€Appellant€knew€that€Embrey€was€planning€to€commit€theÐ p& Ðaggravated€robbery€and€aggravated€assault.€€We€also€conclude€that€the€evidenceÐ `(  Ðwas€sufficient€for€a€rational€jury€to€find€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€AppellantÐ P*ð " Ðacted€with€intent€to€promote€the€commission€of€the€aggravated€robbery€or€share€inÐ @,à"$ Ðthe€proceeds€and€knowingly€furnished€substantial€assistance€in€the€commission€ofÐ 0.Ð$& Ðthe€aggravated€assault.€€The€evidence€showed€that€Appellant€drove€Embrey€to€theÐ  0À&( Ðpharmacy€and€then€Appellant€and€Embrey€waited€in€the€parking€lot€for€at€least€fifteenÐ 2°(* Ðminutes€while€Haas€entered€and€subsequently€left€the€pharmacy.€€The€evidence€alsoÐ 4 *, Ðshowed€that€when€Embrey€entered€the€pharmacy,€Appellant€drove€to€the€churchÐ ð5,. Ðparking€lot€and€Embrey€knew€exactly€where€to€meet€Appellant€after€he€robbedÐ à7€.0 ÐGaston€and€assaulted€Horton.€€In€addition,€Appellant€admitted€in€his€statement€toÐ Ð9p02 ÐGraves€that€he€drove€Embrey€to€the€pharmacy,€he€drove€the€truck€to€the€churchÐ `  Ðparking€lot€where€he€met€Embrey€after€the€robbery,€and€he€then€drove€EmbreyÐ P ð Ðhome.€€Further,€Appellant€stated€that€it€was€Embreyððs€idea€to€rob€the€pharmacy€andÐ @ à ÐAppellant€admitted€that€he€knew€that€Embrey€had€used€a€.38€to€commit€the€robbery.€Ð 0Ð ÐFinally,€Appellant€admitted€that€he€had€lied€when€he€originally€stated€that€he€did€notÐ  À Ðknow€anything€about€the€robbery.€€A€rational€jury€could€reasonably€and€legitimatelyÐ °  Ðinfer€from€this€evidence€that€Appellant€knew€that€Embrey€planned€to€rob€theÐ    Ðpharmacy€and€assault€anyone€who€might€be€in€the€pharmacy,€that€Appellant€andÐ ð  ÐEmbrey€drove€to€the€pharmacy€and€waited€for€customers€to€leave,€that€Appellant€andÐ à€ ÐEmbrey€agreed€on€a€place€to€meet€after€the€robbery,€and€that€Appellant€and€EmbreyÐ Ðp Ðsubsequently€carried€out€their€plans.Ð À` ÐÌà ` àIn€short,€we€conclude€that€when€the€evidence€is€viewed€in€the€light€mostÐ   @ Ðfavorable€to€the€State,€the€evidence€was€sufficient€to€support€Appellantððs€convictions.€Ð "0 ÐAppellant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€this€issue.Ð €$  ÐÌà ` àAccordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€AFFIRMED.Ð `(  ÐÓ  ÓÌÓÓà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à____________________________________Ð @,à"$ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JudgeÐ 8-Ø#% ÐÌÌÌÌCONCUR:Ð 2°(* ÐÌÌÌ___________________________________Ð ð5,. ÐJOHN€H.€PEAY,€Judgeà h àÐ è6ˆ-/ ÐÌÌ___________________________________Ð Ð9p02 ÐJOE€G.€RILEY,€Judge