ÿWPCº /UB¢ %äU.ên( 04+_w@g4§ 0J» 0T 0^Y 0h· 0r 0|‘ 0†  0“ 1u# 0d˜ U6ü 0@2 D3r B¥ B) DCë AM. { v~~ vÓü AQÏÆ  0Dæ 0D* D/n B<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiX%ä2¼A`ArialTT3|xõ«<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXxþ6X@ÉJQX@%ä2¼A`ArialTTt10cpiXXXä2¼P±ŠQXP%ä2¼A`ArialTTt10cpi„„…ä2¼P±ŠQ„P( ¤T$¡¡Ó  Ó ßDàDáâãäå eæÓ€òõäzz!2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(Courier New("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò""""'ÿÿdxd d% Line 7 d####7Border 1dd* $Cþÿ << Gÿÿ ùÝ ƒ!ÝÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ+"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€ÔÔ€ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€XÔÌÌò òJune€09,€1997ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó óPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò*+ ,-Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó..'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÝ  Ý›Ò ° ÒÒ X ÒÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÓ  ÓÔ€ÔÑ\R AØ'\ÑœÞ ÞÌIN›€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌAT€JACKSON̜ـ*ÙßR€%&$A1-j|!þ` Å `€€@ÿRß›ÌMAY€1996€SESSIONÌÓ  ÓÌÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà à€€APPELLEE,à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àNo.€02„C„01„9506„CC„00167Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àHardeman€CountyÌv.à àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àJon€Kerry€Blackwood,€JudgeÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)à à(Murder€Second€Degree)ÌJAMES€IRVIN€HARVEST,à àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àAPPELLANT.à àà à)ÌÌÌÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à àà àà àà àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:ÌÌC.€Michael€Robbinsà àà àà àà àà àJohn€Knox€WalkupÌAssistant€Public€Defenderà àà àà àà àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÌP.O.€Box€700à àà àà àà àà à500€Charlotte€AvenueÌSomerville,€TN€38068à àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0497ÌÌDavid€S.€Stocktonà àà àà àà àà àKathy€MoranteÌAssistant€Public€Defenderà àà àà àà àDeputy€Attorney€GeneralÌP.O.€Box€700à àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌSomerville,€TN€38068à àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493ÌÌOF€COUNSEL:à àà àà àà àà àElizabeth€T.€RiceÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌGary€F.€Antricanà àà àà àà àà à302€Market€StreetÌDistrict€Public€Defenderà àà àà àà àSomerville,€TN€38068ÌP.O.€Box€700ÌSomerville,€TN€38068à àà àà àà àJames€V.€NorwoodÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà à302€Market€StreetÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àSomerville,€TN€38068ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:____________________________________ÌÌÌREVERSED€AND€REMANDED€FOR€A€NEW€TRIALÌÌÌJoe€B.€Jones,€Presiding€JudgeÌÑ7€ÒeXXdÈXXdÈ7ÑÌò òÓ  ÓÔ€„ÔO€P€I€N€I€O€Nó óÌÓ  ÓÔ€XÔÌÌÌÓÓà àà àThe€appellant,€James€Irvin€Harvest€(defendant),€was€convicted€of€murderÏsecond€degree,€a€Class€A€felony,€by€a€jury€of€his€peers.€€The€trial€court€found€theÏdefendant€was€a€mitigated€offender€and€imposed€a€Range€I€sentence€consisting€ofÏconfinement€for€fifteen€(15)€years€in€the€Department€of€Correction.€€In€this€Court,€theÏdefendant€raises€numerous€issues.€€After€a€thorough€review€of€the€record,€the€briefsÏsubmitted€by€the€parties,€and€the€law€governing€the€issues€presented€for€review,€it€isÏthe€opinion€of€this€Court€the€trial€court€should€have€granted€the€defendant's€motion€forÏfunds€to€obtain€an€independent€psychiatrist€to€assist€the€defendant€in€the€presentationÏof€the€insanity€defense.€€Thus,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€reversed€and€this€causeÏis€remanded€to€the€trial€court€for€a€new€trial.Ìà àThe€defendant€has€suffered€from€mental€illness€since€he€was€14€years€of€age,Ïand€he€has€been€mentally€retarded€since€birth.€€His€mother€is€mentally€retarded€andÍwas€confined€to€Cloverbottom€Development€Center€for€years.€€As€a€result,€he€has€beenÏconfined€to€institutions€or€halfway€houses€most€of€his€life.€€He€has€been€confined€to€theÏJohn€Gaston€Hospital€(now€the€MED)€psychiatric€unit,€the€Memphis€Mental€HealthÏInstitute€(MMHI),€Arlington€Developmental€Center€(ADC),€the€Western€State€MentalÏHealth€Institute€(WSMHI),€and€the€Middle€Tennessee€Mental€Health€Institute€(MTMHI).Ìà àThe€defendant€was€first€confined€to€WSMHI€in€1970€and€escaped€later€that€year.€ÏHe€was€apprehended€by€the€Bolivar€Police€Department€shortly€after€the€escape.€€HeÏwas€subsequently€released€in€1971.€€The€defendant€was€determined€to€be€mentallyÏretarded.€€He€was€admitted€because€he€became€"totally€irrational,€extremely€explosive,Ïand€had€auditory€and€visual€hallucinations€telling€him€to€turn€over€tables€and€feel€likeÏkilling€himself."Ìà àIn€1972€the€defendant€was€taken€into€custody€by€officers€of€the€Memphis€PoliceÏDepartment.€€€Due€to€the€defendant's€conduct,€the€defendant€was€taken€to€the€MEDÏpsychiatric€unit.€€He€was€transferred€to€ADC.€€In€1973,€the€defendant€was€transferredÏbetween€ADC€and€MMHI.Ìà àThe€defendant€was€again€hospitalized€in€WSMHI€in€1975.€€He€exhibited€temperÏtantrums€and€was€hostile€towards€the€staff€and€patients€at€ADC.€€It€was€decided€theÏdefendant€needed€to€continue€in„patient€care€at€WSMHI€due€to€his€aggressiveÏbehavior€and€inability€to€handle€his€frustrations.€€He€stayed€at€WSMHI€until€MarchÏ1979€and€was€placed€in€a€halfway€house€later€that€year.Ìà àThe€defendant€was€returned€to€MMHI€in€1981.€€He€claimed€to€be€under€theÏinfluence€of€spirit€voices.€€His€behavior€was€described€as€destructive€and€grosslyÏpsychotic.Ìà àIn€1981€the€defendant€was€transferred€from€MMHI€to€WSMHI€because€he€wasÏviolent€and€physically€threatening€to€the€MMHI€staff.€€He€was€diagnosed€as€havingÏimpaired€memory€of€past€events,€being€mentally€retarded,€having€a€psychosis,€andÏexperiencing€auditory€hallucinations.€€He€attempted€to€commit€suicide€on€two€separateÏoccasions.€€He€was€released€in€1984€and€placed€in€a€halfway€house.Ìà àThe€defendant€was€again€hospitalized€at€WSMHI€in€1985.€€He€was€diagnosedÏas€suffering€from€acute€schizophrenia,€was€said€to€be€a€loner,€and€was€experiencingÏunpredictable€behavior.Ìà àThe€hospitalization€at€WSMHI€was€prompted€by€his€violent€behavior€at€aÏhalfway€house.€€While€staying€in€a€halfway€house,€the€defendant€threatened€the€otherÏresidents€and€the€staff.€€His€behavior€would€change€suddenly,€and€the€behavior€wasÏunpredictable.€€He€had€rapid€mood€swings.€€He€became€violent€without€provocation.€ÏThe€defendant€was€hearing€voices€that€"didn't€make€sense"€to€him,€and€"somethingÏhad€control€of€[his]€brain."€€He€was€again€diagnosed€as€suffering€from€paranoidÏschizophrenia€with€acute€exacerbation.€During€this€hospitalization,€the€defendantÏkilled€his€roommate.€€He€was€charged€with€murder.Ìà àThe€defendant€was€sent€to€MTMHI,€forensic€services€division,€to€determine€if€heÏwas€competent€to€stand€trial€and€whether€an€insanity€defense€could€be€supported.€€HeÏwas€confined€at€MTMHI,€a€secure€facility,€from€1986€to€1990.€€The€defendant€wasÏthought€to€be€a€threat€to€other€patients,€and€he€was€given€a€private€room.€€Experts€inÏthe€forensic€section€concluded€the€defendant€did€"not€possess€the€capacity€toÏappreciate€the€wrongfulness€of€his€alleged€offense€and€to€conform€his€conduct€to€theÏrequirements€of€the€law."€€It€was€their€opinion€the€defendant€was€not€competent€toÍstand€trial,€and€an€insanity€defense€could€be€supported.Ìà àThe€defendant€appeared€in€the€Circuit€Court€of€Hardeman€County.€€After€aÏbench€trial,€the€court€found€the€defendant€was€not€guilty€by€reason€of€insanity.Ìà àThe€defendant€was€subsequently€returned€to€WSMHI€notwithstanding€aÏprevious€finding€he€was€a€danger€to€himself€and€other€patients.€€On€the€night€of€April€9,Ï1994,€the€defendant€killed€the€victim€in€this€case.€€The€forensic€section€found€theÏdefendant€was€competent€to€stand€trial,€and€determined€an€insanity€defense€could€notÏbe€supported.€Ìà àThe€defendant€filed€his€motion€for€funds€to€hire€a€psychiatrist€after€discoveringÏthe€experts€opined€the€defendant€was€competent€to€stand€trial€and€the€evidence€wouldÏnot€support€an€insanity€defense.€€The€trial€court€denied€the€motion€on€the€ground€suchÏassistance€was€only€available€in€death€penalty€cases.€€In€ruling,€the€court€said:ÌÓÓÌÒ ¸ ÒÒ X ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ  ÒòòI€agree€with€you,€Mr.€Robbins,€that€these€reports€areÏinexplicable€or€at€least€confounding€to€the€Courtóó.€€€TheÏrecord's€going€to€indicate€or€at€least€for€the€purpose€of€theÏrecord,€the€Court€will€recall€in€September,€1986,€Mr.€HarvestÏwas€first€brought€before€the€Court€in€Case€No.€4875€inÏwhich€he€was€charged€with€another€first€degree€murderÏcase.€€Shortly€after€that,€in€September,€Western€MentalÏHealth€at€that€time€filed€€a€report€which€indicated€at€that€timeÏhe€was€incompetent€to€stand€trial€and€pursuant€to€thatÏevaluation,€he€was€judicially€hospitalized€for€a€period€of€sixÏmonths€wherein€the€Department€of€Mental€Health€was€toÏreport€periodically€regarding€his€competency€as€well€asÏinsanity€at€the€time€€of€the€commission€of€the€offense.ÌÌSome€time€later,€in€October€of€1988,€the€authorities€atÏWestern€Mental€Health€or€the€authorities€at€„„€in€the€mentalÏhealth€departments,€concluded€that€his€competency€hadÏbeen€restored€to€him€and€he€was€returned€to€court€but€it€wasÏtheir€considered€opinion€at€that€time€that€even€though€he€„„Íthey€had€restored€or€Mr.€Harvest€had€been€restored€toÏcompetency,€the€defense€of€insanity€could€still€be€supportedÏand€at€that€time,€the€Court€conducted€a€bench€trial€and,Ïbased€upon€the€records,€found€Mr.€Harvest€to€be€not€guiltyÏby€reason€of€insanity€based€upon€the€expert€opinions€thatÏwere€rendered€and€their€evaluation€by€the€mental€healthÏexperts.€€He€was€judicially€committed€in€1989€as€a€regard€„„Ïregarding€that€evaluation€which€found€him€to€be€not€guiltyÏby€reason€of€insanity.€€And,€presumably,€he€remained€thereÏin€a€judicial€commitment€posing€a€danger€to€himself€and€toÏothers.€€Now€we€have€„„€now,€we€have€another€charge€inÏ5734€and€reviewing€the€report€here,€the€report€is€that€he€isÏcompetent€and€he€is€„„€and€a€defense€of€insanity€could€notÏbe€supported€on€the€present€charge€of€5734.€€And€I'm€notÏsure€what€the€gist€of€the€rest€of€their€recommendation€isÏregarding€the€standard€of€judicial€commitment€on€the€oldÏcharge€at€4875.€€I€don't€know€whether€their€opinion€is€if€heÏno€longer€is€committable€under€the€section€which€finds€himÏto€be€a€danger€to€himself€or€others,€or€what€it€is,€but€òòitÏappears€to€be€a€myriad€of€contradictionsóó.ÌÌBut€the€problem€that€the€Court€has,€quite€frankly,€is€that€thisÏstatute€applies€to€capital€cases,€but€this€is€not€a€capital€case.€ÏAnd€the€State€has€provided€this€mental€evaluation€at€StateÏexpense€for€Mr.€Harvest€and€I€don't€know€of€any€authorityÏthat€the€Court€has€to€order€a€second€evaluation€at€StateÏexpense€absent€this€being€a€capital€case.€€òòI€donððt€know€„„€I€Ïknow€that€this€Mr.€„„€dealing€with€this€gentleman€since€1986,ÏI€think€it's€incumbent€upon€this€Court€more€than€any€otherÏcase€I€probably€have€ever€sat€on,€to€listen€to€this€proof€as€aÏ13th€juroróó.€€€€€€€€ÌÌÌÒ  ÒÒ  ÒÒ  ÒÒ X Òà àThe€trial€ensued.€€The€defendant€was€convicted€of€murder€second€degree.ÌÌÌÌò òÓ  ÓI.ó óÌÌÓ  ÓÌÓÓà àHistorically,€the€right€to€funding€to€obtain€an€independent€psychiatrist€to€assistÏthe€accused€in€evaluating€the€accused,€to€assist€in€the€preparation€of€defense,€and€toÍtestify€as€an€expert€witness€was€limited€to€capital€cases.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Williamsóó,€657ÏS.W.2d€405,€411€(Tenn.€1983),€òòcertóó.€òòdeniedóó,€465€U.S.€1073,€104€S.Ct.€1429,€79ÏL.Ed.2d€753€(1984).€€In€1995€the€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€extended€the€right€toÏindependent€psychiatric€assistance€to€non„capital€cases.€€òòState€v.€Barnettóó,€909€S.W.2dÏ423€(Tenn.€1995).€€The€court€said€in€òòBarnettóó:ÌÓÓÒ ¸ ÒÒ X ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ  ÒÌ[T]he€due€process€principle€of€fundamental€fairnessÏrequires€that€a€State€which€prosecutes€an€indigentÏdefendant€assure€that€defendant€of€a€fair€opportunity€toÏpresent€his€defense.€€It€is€axiomatic€that€fairness€cannotÏexist€where€an€indigent€defendant€is€deprived€by€poverty€ofÏa€meaningful€opportunity€to€defend€when€his€liberty€is€atÏstake.€€The€due€process€principle€of€fairness€applies€to€allÏcriminal€prosecutions,€and€does€not€rest€upon€the€severityÏof€the€sanction€sought€or€imposed.ÌÌÌÒ  ÒÒ  ÒÒ  ÒÒ X Ò909€S.W.2d€at€428.ÌÌÌÓÓà àIn€this€case,€the€defendant€is€indigent.€€He€has€been€and€is€being€representedÏby€a€public€defender.€€Consequently,€the€defendant€is€entitled€to€the€benefit€bestowedÏby€òòBarnettóó€if€he€can€meet€the€threshold€requirements€mandated€by€òòBarnett.Ìò òÓ  ÓóóÌII.ÌÓ  ÓÌÓ  ÓA.ÌÓ  ÓÌó ó€à àBefore€an€accused€is€entitled€to€the€assistance€of€an€independent€psychiatricÏexamination,€the€accused€must€establish€that€his€or€her€sanity€at€the€time€of€the€offenseÍis€a€significant€factor€at€trial.€€òòBarnettóó,€909€S.W.2d€at€430.€€This€requires€the€accused€toÏestablish€what€is€referred€to€as€a€"particularized€need."€€In€òòBarnettóó€the€supreme€courtÏset€forth€what€the€accused€must€establish€to€fulfill€the€"particularized€need"Ïrequirement:ÌÓÓÌÒ ¸ ÒÒ X ÒÒ ¸ ÒÒ  ÒTo€establish€particularized€need,€the€defendant€must€showÏthat€a€psychiatric€expert€is€necessary€to€protect€his€right€to€aÏfair€trial.€€Unsupported€assertions€that€a€psychiatric€expert€isÏnecessary€to€counter€the€State's€proof€are€not€sufficient.€ÏThe€defendant€must€demonstrate€by€reference€to€the€factsÏand€circumstances€of€his€particular€case€that€appointment€ofÏa€psychiatric€expert€is€necessary€to€insure€a€fair€trial.ÌÌÌÒ  ÒÒ  ÒÒ  ÒÒ X Ò909€S.W.2d€at€431.ÌÌÌÓÓà àWhen€making€the€determination€of€"particularized€need,"€the€"trial€court€shouldÏconsider€all€facts€and€circumstances€known€to€it€at€the€time€the€motion€for€expertÏassistance€is€made."€òòBarnettóó,€909€S.W.2d€at€431.€€In€this€case,€the€trial€court€hadÏknowledge€of€the€defendant's€mental€health€history.€€The€court€sat€in€judgment€of€theÏdefendant€in€1988€when€it€was€determined€he€was€not€guilty€by€reason€of€insanity.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓB.ó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àIn€the€context€of€this€case,€the€defendant€established€"particularized€need"Ïwarranting€the€providing€of€funds€for€the€defendant€to€obtain€the€services€of€aÏpsychiatric€expert€to€evaluate€him,€to€assist€in€the€preparation€of€the€insanity€defense,Ïand,€if€possible,€to€testify€in€support€of€the€insanity€defense.€€There€are€several€reasonsÍwhy€this€Court€reaches€this€conclusion.Ìà àAs€previously€noted,€the€defendant€has€been€institutionalized€at€several€mentalÏhealth€facilities€since€he€was€14€years€of€age.€€He€was€38€years€of€age€when€theÏoffense€in€question€occurred.€€The€nature€of€the€defendant's€mental€illness€is€set€forthÏhereinabove.€€In€summary,€he€has€been€diagnosed€through€the€years€as€beingÏmentally€retarded.€€He€has€been€diagnosed€as€having€an€impairment€of€his€long„termÏmemory,€auditory€and€visual€hallucinations,€and€a€psychosis.€€He€has€been€diagnosedÏas€a€paranoid€schizophrenic€with€acute€exacerbation.€€He€is€prone€to€unpredictableÏaggressive€behavior€resulting€from€sudden€mood€swings€and€can€become€violentÏwithout€provocation.€€He€has€also€suffered€from€other€minor€illnesses.€€His€soleÏdefense€in€the€case€òòsubóó€òòjudiceóó€was€insanity€at€the€time€he€committed€the€offense€inÏquestion.€€Thus,€the€defendant's€sanity€at€the€time€the€offense€was€committed€was€aÏhighly€significant€factor€during€the€trial€of€this€case.Ìà àWhen€the€defendant€murdered€a€roommate€in€1986,€the€experts€found€theÏdefendant€was€incompetent€to€stand€trial,€and€the€medical€proof€would€support€anÏinsanity€defense.€€When€the€defendant€was€found€to€be€competent,€he€was€tried€by€theÏtrial€court€without€the€intervention€of€a€jury,€and€the€court€found€the€defendant€was€notÏguilty€by€reason€of€insanity.€€€According€to€the€medical€records,€the€defendant's€mentalÏhealth€did€not€change€between€1986€and€1994.Ìà àIn€this€case,€the€defendant€murdered€a€second€roommate€in€1994.€€Although€theÏstate€of€his€mental€health€had€not€changed€during€the€ensuing€eight€years,€the€MTMHIÏforensic€division€found€the€defendant€competent€to€stand€trial,€and€found€the€medicalÏevidence€would€not€support€an€insanity€defense.€€The€report€seems€to€trivialize€someÍof€the€defendant's€mental€health€problems,€places€no€emphasis€on€serious€mentalÏhealth€problems,€and€makes€several€findings€which€are€inconsistent€with€prior€findingsÏof€medical€doctors€and€psychologists.€The€trial€court€called€the€report€"inexplicable"Ïand€"confounding."€€The€court€further€stated€the€report€"appear[ed]€to€be€a€myriad€ofÏcontradictions."€€Based€upon€the€history€of€mental€illness€known€to€the€court,€the€courtÏstated€it€was€"incumbent€upon€[the]€Court€more€than€any€other€I€probably€have€ever€satÏon,€to€listen€to€this€proof€as€a€13th€juror."€€This€is€sufficient€to€support€the€need€forÏindependent€psychiatric€assistance.Ìà àThere€is€an€appearance€of€impropriety€and€conflict€of€interest€when€one€stateÏmental€health€facility€evaluates€the€patient€of€another€state€mental€health€facility,Ïespecially€when€someone€has€been€killed€at€the€resident€facility.€€The€public€couldÏperceive€the€mental€health€facilities€wanted€to€rid€themselves€of€the€defendantÏbecause€he€posed€a€serious€problem€to€the€resident€facility.€€He€needed€to€be€placedÏin€a€secure€facility,€and€he€must€be€housed€in€a€room€by€himself.€€In€short,€he€posed€aÏserious€threat€to€other€patients,€staff,€and€himself€since€he€had€attempted€to€commitÏsuicide€on€more€than€one€occasion.€€The€public€could€also€perceive€the€change€in€theÏevaluation€may€be€to€protect€the€mental€health€facility€where€the€killing€occurred€fromÏliability.€€Providing€funds€for€the€employment€of€a€psychiatrist€to€assist€the€defendant€toÏcounter€this€new€finding€would€remove€the€appearance€of€an€impropriety€and€conflictÏof€interest.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓCONCLUSIONó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àInsanity€was€the€only€defense€asserted€by€the€defendant,€and,€based€upon€hisÏprior€history€of€mental€illness,€the€defense€was€a€significant€factor€during€the€trial€of€thisÏcase€on€the€merits.€€Furthermore,€the€defendant€established€"particularized€need."€ÏTherefore,€the€trial€court€should€have€authorized€the€expenditure€of€state€funds€for€aÏpsychiatrist€to€evaluate€the€defendant,€assist€in€the€insanity€defense,€and€testify€at€theÏtrial€if€called€by€the€defendant.Ìà àWhile€this€Court€has€not€addressed€the€other€issues€raised€by€the€defendant,Ïthe€law€of€the€case€shall€not€apply.€€The€expert€selected€by€the€defendant€may€haveÏevidence€to€admit€in€pretrial€motions€and€the€trial€which€may€alter€the€rulings€of€the€trialÏcourt.ÌÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà à________________________________________Ì€à àà àà àà àà àà à€€€€€€€JOE€B.€JONES,€PRESIDING€JUDGEÌÌÌÇCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌÌ_______________________________________Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€DAVID€G.€HAYES,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌ_______________________________________Ì€€€€€DAVID€R.€FARMER,€SPECIAL€JUDGE€