WPCe ƥğ,IPV#nK1ާT}%1ƾ`srm_ļj%*|'6 >zʡpѢ ]^NX}c̑|/D|ϼ5]fi] }2U=EtӬt%R:s(^Gnxxk*] %MV86Hi&Bb}@ 6vuժבr!ŗ1ho"M@RXB5וr;&j+Wܹe&`[dj0`suTl7Xܭ6A:ݑDLbaimjQ":hR) >A9{`T R)Ji!uSU_zz*C#c' Gʅ86n7p?ut N!#B# F U:Q % 0G w@ 4 , $; _ 0g 0D 6 > GF U:qGU: B,,,,,,,, D3III 0D|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AO 0D D/ BHHP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLh,  AZ"Arial RegularX(,$XoXXX  E  E  E   (e ӀuM%x3|x    XXXX `   1    Theofficertestifiedthat,uponinvestigation,hedeterminedthatthe  defendantdidnotresideintheareabutlivedaquartertoonehalfmileaway.(;(3$ ,!XXXX      0  (#$  0   =  XXXX `   2    Therecordinunclearwhethercasenumber37849alsoincluded  convictionsforaggravatedassaultandaggravatedburglary.Theindictmentinthatcaseapparentlyincludedthesecharges. XXXXH XX   Ad FILEDXXH   June1,1999CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerkdAM ,cAZ"Arial Regular =  XXXX `   2    Therecordinunclearwhethercasenumber37849alsoincluded  convictionsforaggravatedassaultandaggravatedburglary.Theindictmentinthatcaseapparentlyincludedthesecharges.,  AZ"Arial Regular d""""'dxd(3$ !  -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd ,!XXXX     TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T  7Xdd7   r*<,(j 8` `@E` 8ttxP  rߛ INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  ATNASHVILLE    APRIL1999SESSION  `   STATEOFTENNESSEE,  h     )  T  `     h     ) `  Appellee , h     ) C.C.A.No.01C019806CC00263  &   `     h     )    vs . `     h     ) MontgomeryCounty     `     h     ) CALVINEUGENEHEAD, h     ) HonorableRobertW.Wedemeyer  z    `     h     ) f   `  Appellant . h     ) 򀀀(PossessionofCocainewith L  `     h     ) IntenttoSell)  8  `     h     ) `     h     ) FORTHEAPPELLANT: h     FORTHEAPPELLEE: &  MICHAELR.JONES  h     JOHNKNOXWALKUP   19thDistrictPublicDefender    AttorneyGeneral&Reporter  110SixthAvenue,WestSpringfield,TN37172 h   ELIZABETHB.MARNEY  `  `     h     AssistantAttorneyGeneral `     h     425FifthAvenueNorth `     h     Nashville,TN  37243    `        h        񀀀 JOHNWESLEY  CARNEY  ,JR.   4  `     h   District  AttorneyGeneral   `     h   HELENO.YOUNG  #"  `     h     AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral `     h   204FranklinStreet,Suite200 `     h     Clarksville,TN  37040 x   T&!%  `     `      h     STEVE  GARRETT     (p#'  `     h       AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral   )\$(  `     h 500SouthMainStreet   )H%)  `     Springfield,TN37172  *4&*  `   `      OPINIONFILED:_____________ AFFIRMED 41,1 JAMESCURWOODWITT,JR.,JUDGE  3H/4  .;~6< Ї  vXX OPINION     `  XXv `  Thedefendant,CalvinEugeneHead,appealsfrom  his    Montgomery ( CountyCircuitCourt  conviction    andfromtheresultingsentence  by    thetrialcourt.  A    juryconvictedthedefendantoftheClassCfelonyofpossessionofcocainewithintenttosell,andafterasentencinghearing,thetrialcourtimposedaRangeIsentenceoffiveyearsconfinementintheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrectionandorderedthesentencetobeservedconsecutivelytoa  tenyear     sentencepreviously    imposeduponthedefendantinanunrelatedMontgomeryCountyrobberycase.Inthisappeal,thedefendantchallengesthesufficiencyoftheconvictingevidenceandassertsthatthetrialcourterredinsentencinghimtoa  fiveyear    sentencetobeservedconsecutivelytotheprevious  tenyear    sentence.Afterareviewoftherecord,theapplicablelaw,andthebriefsoftheparties,weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. `  Atabout9:30p.m.onAugust31,1995,aClarksvillepoliceofficerobservedthedefendantandacompanionstandinginastreetculdesac  near    alowincomehousingproject  in    Clarksville.Theofficerobservedthedefendantandhiscompanion flaggingatpassingvehiclesanddescribed flaggingasameansofsolicitingcustomersfordrugsales.Theneighborhoodwasknownfordrugtrafficking.Afterobservingthedefendantandhiscompanionflagginganumberofvehicles,theofficerradioedthreefellowofficerswhowereparkednearby.Inresponsetotheradiocall,thethree  officersdrovetotheculdesac  inanunmarked,detectivetypepolice  car.    Asoneofficeremergedfromthecar,heshinedaflashlightontothedefendantandhiscompanion,identifiedhimselfasapoliceofficer,andaskedtospeakwiththem.Theofficerwasclothedinapolice identificationjacketwithyellowlettering,woreabadgebelt,andaserviceweapon.Thedefendantandhiscompanionhadbeguntowalkawayfromthescenebut  ran    whentheofficersaid police.Thedefendantandhiscompanion  didnot    stopwhentheofficeryelled, Policeofficer,stop.Theofficerspursuedandthenapprehended \94: boththedefendantandhiscompanion.Theofficershandcuffedthedefendantandsearchedhis  clothing.In    hisleft  frontpants    pocket,theyfoundsomebillsofcurrencytotaling  $68    wrappedaroundafoldedpieceoffoil.Insidethefoil,theofficersfoundfourteenpiecesofcrackcocaineweighing0.5grams. `  Theofficerwhoinitiallyaccostedthedefendanttestifiedthatthemanagementofthehousingauthorityinthe  neighborhoodpreviously    hadprovidedthepolicedepartmentwithcopiesof criminaltrespasslettersandhadsolicitedthedepartmentsassistanceincurtailingcrimeintheareabyriddingthehousingprojectsoftrespassers.Theofficer,whodidnotpersonallywitnessthedefendants flaggingactivity,testifiedthathedesiredtospeaktothedefendantinordertodetermineifhelivedintheadjacenthousingproject.  %  1       `  `  Thedefendantdidnottestifyandofferednowitnessesinhisdefense.OnAugust28,1996,  after    theAugust1995commissionofthedrug  offensenowunderreview,  thedefendantcommittedtheaggravatedrobbery  that  waschargedin  Montgomery    CountyCircuitCourtcase  number    37849.HewasthenconvictedinthepresentcaseonFebruary20,1997.In  number    37849,hepleadedguiltyandreceivedaconvictiononJuly28,1997.HewasthensentencedinthepresentcaseonApril7,1998.Thedefendantreceivedaneffectivesentenceoftenyearsincase  number    37849andwasintheprocessofservingthatsentencewhenhewassentencedinthepresentcase. `  Atthesentencinghearingbelow,thetrialcourtdeterminedthedefendanttobeaRangeI,standardoffender,forwhichtheClassCpunishment p504 rangeisthreetosixyears.Thetrialcourt  enhanced    thesentencepursuanttoTennesseeCodeAnnotated  section    4035114(1)(thatadefendanthasapriorhistoryofcriminalconvictionsorcriminalbehaviorinadditiontothosenecessarytoestablishtherange).Thecourtannouncedthatitaccordedsomemitigatingweighttothedefendants  youth.Hewas    nineteenyearsofage  whenhecommitted    the  offense;  however,theenhancementfactoroutweighedthemitigatingfactorandresultedinthecourtimposingasentenceoffiveyearstobeservedintheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrection.Thecourtimposedthissentencetorunconsecutivelytotheeffectivetenyearsentenceincase  number    37849.  I.SufficiencyoftheEvidence. p    `  Inthedefendantsfirstissue,hearguesthattheevidenceis 0 insufficienttoestablishthatthedefendanthadanyintenttosellcocaine. `  Itiswellestablishedthatajuryverdict,approvedbythetrialjudge,accreditsthetestimonyofthewitnessesforthestateandresolvesallconflictsinfavorofthetheoryofthestate.Statev.Hatchett,560S.W.2d627,630(Tenn. $" 1978);Statev.Townsend,525S.W.2d842,843(Tenn.1975).Onappeal,thestate p&!$ isentitledtothestrongestlegitimateviewoftheevidenceandallreasonableorlegitimateinferenceswhichmaybedrawntherefrom.Statev.Cabbage,571 0*%( S.W.2d832,836(Tenn.1978). `  Moreover,averdictagainstthedefendantremovesthepresumptionofinnocenceandraisesapresumptionofguiltonappeal,Statev.Grace,493S.W. 1-0 2d474,476(Tenn.1973);Anglinv.State,553S.W.2d616,620(Tenn.Crim.App. 3.2 1977),whichthedefendanthastheburdenofovercoming.Statev.Brown,551 p504 S.W.2d329,331(Tenn.1977). 0948  `  Mostsignificantly,wherethesufficiencyoftheevidenceischallenged,therelevantquestionforanappellatecourtiswhether,afterreviewingtheevidenceinthelightmostfavorabletotheprosecution,anyrationaltrieroffactcouldhavefoundtheessentialelementsofthecrimebeyondareasonabledoubt.Jacksonv. P  Virginia,443U.S.307,  324,99    S.Ct.2781,  279192    (1979);TennR.App.P.  13;     0    see    also,Statev.Williams,657S.W.2d405(Tenn.1983).Thisruleappliesto `  findingsbased  upon    bothdirectandcircumstantialevidence.Statev.Thomas,755 @  S.W.2d838,842(Tenn.Crim.App.1988).Circumstantialevidencealonemaybesufficienttoconvictoneofacrime.Statev.Boling,840S.W.2d944,947(Tenn.  Crim.App.1992). `  TennesseeCodeAnnotatedSection3917417makesitanoffensetoknowinglypossess  cocaine,  aScheduleIIcontrolled  substance,withtheintenttosell.    Tenn.CodeAnn.3917417(a),(c)(1)(1997). `  Inthelightmostfavorabletothestate,  the    defendant  andanother    youngmalewerestandinginthe  culdesacat    approximately9:30p.m.inalowincomehousingprojectareathatwasknowntobeahighcrimeareawheredrug  trafficking,inparticular,    wasafrequentoccurrence.Themanagementofthehousingassociationhadcomplained  ofnonresidents    trespassinginthearea  and    hadaskedforpoliceassistanceinprotectingtheresidentsfromnonresidentsbentonmischief.Againstthisbackdrop,anexperiencedofficer,whohadwitnessed flaggingactivityonnumerousoccasionsinhispreviousnarcoticsinvestigations,sawthedefendantandhiscompanion flaggingcarswhichpassedtheculdesac.Believingthatthedefendantandhiscompanionwereattemptingtoselldrugs,theofficerradioedhisfellowofficerswhowerestationednearbyinapolicecar.Althoughthiscardidnotbearpoliceinsignia,theproofshowedthatitwasreadilyidentifiedbypersonsinthecommunityasbeingapolicevehicleandwasequippedwithgovernmentlicenseplatesandradio  antennae.    Whentheofficersinthiscar 0948 arrivedattheculdesac,oneoftheofficersemergedfromthecarwearingapolice  identification     jacket    onwhichtheword  policeappeal    inyellowletters.He litthedefendantandhiscompanionwithaflashlight,identifiedhimselfasanofficerandstatedhewishedtospeaktothem.Thedefendantandhiscompanionbegantowalkawayandthenrandespitethe  officers     command,    Policeofficer,stop.Afterapprehendingthedefendantfollowingafootchase,theofficerssearchedthedefendantspocketsandfoundfourteenrocksofcrackcocaineinsideapieceoffoilwhichwaswrappedinside$68incurrency.Whenthecocainewasdiscovered,thedefendantbegantocomplainloudlytoonlookinghousingresidents  that    theofficershadplantedthecocaineonhim.Thedefendant,whohadnocracksmokingparaphernaliaonhisperson,wasinanareaapproximately  onequarter    toonehalfmilefromhisresidence.Thefourteenrocksofcocainefoundinhispockettotaled0.5gramsinweight.Someoftherockswereofasizetocommandastreetpriceof$10to$20each. `  Weholdthatthesefactsamplysupportafindingthatthedefendantknowinglypossessed  crackcocainewith    intentto  sell.      II.Sentencing. p&!$    `  Thedefendantarguesthatthetrialcourterredinimposingafiveyear 0*%( sentenceandimposingthesentencetorunconsecutivelytotheeffectivetenyearsentenceimposedincase  number    37849. `  Whenthereisachallengetothelength,range,ormannerofserviceofasentence,itisthedutyofthiscourttoconducta  de    novo    reviewoftherecord 3.2 withapresumptionthatthedeterminationsmadebythetrialcourtarecorrect.Tenn.CodeAnn.  4035401(d)  (1997).Thispresumptionis conditionedupontheaffirmativeshowingintherecordthatthetrialcourtconsideredthesentencing 0948 principlesandallrelevantfactsandcircumstances.Statev.Ashby,823S.W.2d  166,169(Tenn.1991). Theburdenofshowingthatthesentenceisimproperisupontheappellant.Id.  In    theeventtherecordfailstodemonstratetherequired p considerationbythetrialcourt,reviewofthesentenceispurelydenovo.Id.  If     P  appellatereviewreflectsthetrialcourtproperlyconsideredallrelevantfactorsanditsfindingsoffactareadequatelysupportedbytherecord,thiscourtmustaffirmthesentence, evenifwewouldhavepreferredadifferentresult.Statev.Fletcher,805 @  S.W.2d785,789(Tenn.Crim.App.1991). `  Inmakingitssentencingdetermination,thetrialcourt,atthe conclusionofthesentencinghearing,determinestherangeofsentenceandthendeterminesthespecificsentenceandtheproprietyofsentencingalternativesbyconsidering(1)theevidence,ifany,receivedatthetrialandthesentencinghearing;(2)thepresentencereport;(3)theprinciplesofsentencingandargumentsastosentencingalternatives;(4)thenatureandcharacteristicsofthecriminalconductinvolved;(5)evidenceandinformationofferedbythepartiesontheenhancementandmitigatingfactors;(6)anystatementsthedefendantwishestomakeinthedefendantsbehalfaboutsentencing;and(7)thepotentialforrehabilitationortreatment.Tenn.CodeAnn.  4035210(a),    (b)(1997);Tenn.CodeAnn.  4035103(5)(1990);  Statev.Holland,860S.W.2d53,60(Tenn.Crim.App.1993). P(#&  `  Therecorddemonstratesthatthetrialcourtconsideredtherelevantprinciplesandfactorsandmadefindingsoffact.Accordingly,wereviewitssentencingdeterminationswithapresumptionofcorrectness. `  Thepresentencereportwasmadeanexhibittothesentencehearingandreflectsthatthedefendantsprevioushistoryofcriminalbehaviorincludedan extensivehistoryofusingmarijuanaandajuvenileadjudicationforjoyriding.ThedefendantsMontgomeryCircuitCourtrecordincase  number    37849,whichthetrial 0948 courtjudiciallynoticed,showedthat,priortosentencinginthepresentcase,thedefendantcommittedaggravatedrobbery.      %  2         SeeStatev.ChadDouglas    Poole   ,No.      02C01   9506CC00178,slipop.at  56    (Tenn.  Crim  .  App  .,Jackson,Jan.31,1996)(    sentencer   mayconsidercriminalconvictionsorbehaviorwhichoccurred priortothesentencinghearingasconstitutingaprevioushistoryofcriminalconvictionsorcriminalbehavior,regardlessofwhethertheconvictionsorbehavioroccurredbeforeorafterthecriminalconductunder  consideration),      affdonothergrounds,945   @    S.W.2d  93  (Tenn.1997).    Therecord,therefore,amplysupportstheenhancementofthedefendantsRangeIsentencepursuanttoTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035114(1).Thetrialcourtproperlyappliedthisenhancementfactor. `  Thetrialcourtapparentlyappliedmitigatingfactor(6).Tenn.CodeAnn.4035113(6)(1997)(defendantlackedsubstantialjudgmentbecauseofyouthoroldage).Ifso,thetrialcourtactedbeneficentlytowardthedefendantbecausewediscernnobasisintherecordfordeterminingthatthedefendant,duetohisyouth,lackedjudgment.SeeStatev.Adams,864S.W.2d31,33(Tenn.   1993).Nevertheless,evengivingthedefendantthebenefitofthetrialcourtslargess,thepresenceofenhancementfactor(1)significantlyoutweighsthemitigatingfactorandsupportsthelessthanmaximumfiveyearsentence. `  ThetrialcourtimposedconsecutivesentencesbaseduponitsdeterminationthatconsecutivesentencesweremandatorypursuanttothetermsofTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4020111andTennesseeRuleofCriminalProcedure32(c).Codesection4020111(b)provides: Inanycaseinwhichadefendantcommitsafelonywhilesuchdefendantwasreleasedonbail...andthedefendantisconvictedofbothsuchoffenses,thetrialjudgeshallnothave 3.2 discretionastowhetherthesentenceshallrunconcurrentlyor 4/3 cumulatively,butshallorderthatsuchsentencesbeserved p504 cumulatively.   Tenn.CodeAnn.4020111(b)(1997)(emphasisadded).Rule32(c)(3)provides: Whereadefendant...hadadditionalsentencesnotyetfullyservedastheresultoftheconvictionsinthesameorothercourtandthelawrequiresconsecutivesentences,thesentenceshallbeconsecutivewhetherthejudgmentexplicitlysoordersornot.Thisruleshallapply: 0  ...(c)Toasentenceforafelonywherethedefendantwas `  releasedonbailandthedefendantisconvictedofboth P  offenses;... @   Tenn.R.Crim.P.32(c)(3)(emphasisadded). `  Theseprovisionsmandatethetrialcourtsimpositionofconsecutivesentences.Thetrialcourtfoundthatthedefendantwasonbailforthepresentcasewhenhecommittedtheoffenseoroffenseswhichresultedinthechargesincase  number    37849.Itis irrelevantwhethertheconvictionforthefirstoffense,releasingthedefendantonbail,occurspriortotheconvictionforthesecondoffense,occurringwhilethedefendantisonbail.Statev.Blanton,926S.W.2d  953,    961 @ (Tenn.Crim.App.1996). [    I]t   isimmaterialwhethersentenceoneisconsecutivetosentencetwo,orviceversa,asthesentencesareconsecutiveineithercase.Id. "   `  Inpassing,wenotethatthetrialcourtbasedcertainfindingsuponitsjudicialnoticeofitsownrecordincase  number    37849.Thetranscriptreflectsthatthetrialjudgereviewedtheoriginal37849fileduringthesentencinghearing,andbyoralannouncementhemadespecificfindingsabouttheconvictionandsentencein37849andaboutthechronologyofeventsinthatcaseascomparedtotheeventsinthepresentcase.Basedonhisfindings,thetrialjudgeconcluded,withoutcontroversyfromthedefendant,thatthedefendantwasonbailinthepresentcasewhentheoffensechargedin37849wascommitted.Tobesure,thetrialcourtwasallowedtotakejudicialnoticeofitscourtrecords,Statev.RichardDouglasLowery, p504 No.  03C01  9604CC00146,slipop.at1113(Tenn.Crim.App.,Knoxville,May19  1997)perm.  app  .denied(Tenn.1998)   (defendants    priorconviction  recordfromthe 0948 sentencingcourt    judiciallynoticeableinsentencinghearing,pursuanttoTennesseeRuleofEvidence201(b)(2),(c),(f),andasfacilitatedbyTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035202(a)  (1997))  ;    however,therecordsnoticeddidnotfindtheirwayintothetrialrecordbeloworatleastintotherecordonappeal.Thebetterpracticeisforthetrialcourttoexhibittothe  hearing    copiesoftheportionsofthenoticed,originalrecordswhichthecourtreliedupon. `  Nevertheless,inasmuchastheappellaterecorddoesreflectthatthetrialcourttookjudicialnoticeandthatitentereditsfindingsfromthatnoticeontherecord,seeRichardDouglasLowery,slipop.at12,andfurtherthatthosefindings  werenotcontradictednorchallengedbydefendanteitherinthetrialcourtoronappeal,wedeemtherecordsufficienttosupportthetrialcourtsfindingsof(1)criminalrecordbaseduponthe37849convictionand(2)thedefendantsonbailstatuswhenthe37849offenseswerecommitted.Seeid.Underthefactsofthis ` case,  should    thejudiciallynoticedrecords  not    supportthetrialcourtsfindings,itbehoovedthedefendant,astheappellant,toassureanappellaterecordthatdemonstratedhisclaim. Whenanappellantoranypartyseeksreviewofissuesbefore[thiscourt],thatpartymustpreparearecordwhichconveysafairandcompleteaccountofwhattranspiredinthetrialcourt.Statev.Locust,914S.W.2d p&!$ 554,557(Tenn.Crim.App.  1995);seeTenn.R.App.P.24.In    theabsenceofsuch P(#& arecord,thiscourtmust conclusivelypresumethatthejudgmentofthetrialcourtwascorrect.   Id  Lo  x   cus  ru   t  ,914S.W.2dat557.  u   x   .     ,`'*  `  Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed. `     h     _______________________________ `     h     JAMES  CURWOOD   WITT  ,JR.,Judge  :p59 ЇCONCUR:____________________________JOHNH.  PEAY  ,Judge____________________________DAVIDH.  WELLES  ,Judge `