ÿWPCO …# VUNa %¯ 0(µbÝw@å4% 9 H 0JP 0Tš 0^î 0hL 0r´ 0|& 0†¢ 0( 1u¸ 0d- U>‘ U*Ï B)ù DC" AMe² BÉv~ævÓd D37 0@j AOªÆù 0D¿ D/ B2˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLlÎ(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡- ù- E  D DDDÓ€Úƒç"3|x2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d!!!!7Border 1dd€-"Cþÿ << Gÿÿ Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÔ€ ÔÔ€ ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€ XÔÌÌò òJuly€16,€1997ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó dPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò%%%%'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÝ  Ý›Ñ ` ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÔ€ŠÔÔ€ ÔÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ€ÑÑ7€•dXXdìdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÓ  Óò òÓ` °ˆXüÈ“XÓÞ ÞÌIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEE̜ـ€ÙßR€#$"A1-j|` Å `€€@ÿRß›ÌAT€KNOXVILLEÌÌFEBRUARY€SESSION,€1997ÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓJEFFREY€ALLEN€HUDSONà àà à)à àC.C.A.€NO.€03C01„9605„CC„00200Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àó óÌà àà àPetitioner/Appellant,ò òà à)à àBLEDSOE€COUNTYÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌV.à àà àà àà àà àà à)à àHON.€THOMAS€W.€GRAHAM,Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àJUDGEó óÌò òJAMES€BOWLEN,€WARDEN,à àà à)à àó óÌà àà àà àà àà àò òà à)à à(HABEAS€CORPUS/ó óÌà àà àAppellee.à àà àò òà à)à àAGGRAVATED€RAPE)Ìó óÌÌÌÓ  ÓÌòòÓ  ÓFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à àà àòòà àà àFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:ÌÌò òJEFFREY€ALLEN€HUDSON,€(pro€se)à àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUP€Ìó óSTSRCF,€Route€4€Box€600à àà àà àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÌPikeville,€TN€37367Ìà àà àà àò òà àà àà àà àSARA€M.€BRANCHÌó óà àà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àò òà àJAMES€MICHAEL€TAYLORÌà àà àà àà àà àà àó óà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àò òà àJAMES€W.€POPE,€IIIó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà à265€Third€Avenue,€Suite€300Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àDayton,€TN€€37321ÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED€________________________ÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGEÇò òòòÓ  ÓÔ€ °ÔOPINIONóóó óÔ€ ŠÔÌÌÌÌà àÓ  ÓÓÓà àà àThis€is€an€appeal€as€of€right€by€Jeffrey€Allen€Hudson€fromÏthe€trial€courtððs€order€dismissing€his€petition€for€writ€of€habeas€corpus.€€The€CircuitÏCourt€of€Bledsoe€County,€Tennessee€dismissed€the€petition€without€anÏevidentiary€hearing€based€upon€a€finding€that€the€judgment€of€conviction€wasÏfacially€valid.€€We€note€that€the€fifty€(50)€year€sentence€imposed€upon€PetitionerÏin€1987€has€not€yet€expired.€€The€Petitioner€raises€two€(2)€issues€in€his€appeal.€ÏHe€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€ruling€the€judgment€of€conviction€wasÏvoidable€rather€than€void€and€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€treating€his€writ€ofÏhabeas€corpus€as€a€petition€for€post„conviction€relief.€€We€find€no€merit€in€eitherÏone€of€the€Appellantððs€issues,€and€affirm€the€trial€court.ÌÌà àà àAppellant€was€convicted€in€the€Criminal€Court€of€Shelby€County€inÏ1987€for€the€aggravated€rape€of€a€twelve€(12)€year€old€child.€€He€filed€a€directÏappeal€from€his€conviction€to€this€court.€€On€his€direct€appeal,€he€did€notÏchallenge€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€to€sustain€the€conviction,€but€allegedÏreversible€error€caused€by€the€admission€into€evidence€of€ð ðother€crimesððÏevidence.€€This€court€found€no€reversible€error€and€affirmed€the€conviction.€€òòStateÏv.€Jeffrey€Allen€Hudsonóó,€No.€12,€Shelby€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Jackson,€filedÍNovember€16,€1988).€Subsequently,€Appellant€filed€a€petition€for€post„convictionÏrelief€in€the€Criminal€Court€of€Shelby€County,€attacking€his€conviction€forÏaggravated€rape.€€In€his€petition€for€post„conviction€relief,€he€alleged€ineffectiveÏassistance€of€counsel€during€the€prior€proceeding.€€The€trial€court€dismissed€theÏpetition€for€post„conviction€relief€and€this€court€affirmed.€€òòJeffrey€A.€Hudson€v.ÏStateóó,€No.€02C01„9308„CR„00183,€Shelby€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Jackson,Ïfiled€December€7,€1994),€òòpermóó.€òòtoóó€òòappealóó€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1995).€€€ÌÌà àà àIn€his€petition€for€writ€of€habeas€corpus€filed€in€the€Circuit€Court€ofÏBledsoe€County,€Appellant€did€not€allege€that€his€sentence€had€expired.€€He€didÏallege€that€the€conviction€was€void€because€the€Shelby€County€Court€lackedÏjurisdiction€to€enter€the€judgment€because€€the€crime€ð ðpetitioner€stands€convictedÏof€ò òdid€not€ó óoccur€in€Shelby€County,€Tennessee,€but€in€all€actuality€occurred€inÏDesoto€County,€Mississippi.ðð€€œ(Emphasis›€in€original).ÌÌà àà àAppellant€requests€relief€by€writ€of€habeas€corpus€based€uponÏallegations€that€the€convicting€court€in€Shelby€County€lacked€venue€andÏjurisdiction€to€hear€the€case.€€In€òòArcher€v.€Stateóó,€851€S.W.2d€157€(Tenn.€1993),€Ìthe€court€held:ÌÓÓà8 àÌà8 àœà àHabeas›€corpus€relief€is€available€in€Tennessee€only€when€ð ðitÏappears€upon€the€face€of€the€judgment€or€the€record€of€theÍproceedings€upon€which€the€judgment€is€renderedðð€that€a€convictingÏcourt€was€without€jurisdiction€or€authority€to€sentence€a€defendant,Ïor€that€a€defendantððs€sentence€of€imprisonment€or€other€restraintÏhas€expired.ÌÌÌòòArcheróó,€851€S.W.2d€œat€164.€ÌÌÓÓÌà àà àAll€that€is€contained€in€the€record€on€appeal€in€this€case€is€theÏPetition€for€Writ€of€Habeas€Corpus,€without€any€attachments€thereto,€the€trialÏcourtððs€order€dismissing€the€petition,€and€the€Appellantððs€Notice€of€Appeal.€ÏHowever,€from€the€opinion€of€this€court€in€the€direct€appeal€by€Appellant€from€hisÏconviction,€we€note€that€he€was€convicted€following€a€jury€trial€in€the€ShelbyÏCounty€Criminal€Court.€€We€may€therefore€presume€that€venue€of€the€offense€inÏShelby€County€was€satisfactorily€proven,€and€jurisdiction€was€also€proven€thatÏthe€crime€had€occurred€in€the€State€of€Tennessee€and€not€in€Mississippi.€€InÏòòBomar€v.€State,€ex€rel.€Stewartóó,€201€Tenn.€480,€300€S.W.2d€885€(1957),€aÏdefendant€pled€guilty€to€kidnapping,€armed€robbery,€and€grand€larceny€in€theÏCriminal€Court€of€Montgomery€County€for€offenses€which€were€committed€whenÏthe€defendant€was€a€juvenile.€€There€was€no€hearing€in€juvenile€court€to€transferÏthe€case€for€the€defendant€to€be€tried€as€an€adult.€€However,€at€the€defendantððsÏarraignment€in€criminal€court,€he€informed€his€attorney,€the€district€attorney,€andÏthe€trial€court€that€he€was€eighteen€(18)€years€of€age.€€The€defendantÏsubsequently€filed€a€petition€for€writ€of€habeas€corpus€alleging€that€the€criminalÍcourt€was€without€jurisdiction€to€enter€€a€judgment€of€conviction€when€he€wasÏnot€an€adult.€€He€specifically€alleged€that€the€judgments€were€void€on€their€face.€ÏThe€trial€court€sustained€the€petition€after€hearing€the€proof€of€the€defendantððsÏage€at€the€time€of€the€offenses.€€The€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€reversed€andÏdenied€the€petition€for€writ€of€habeas€corpus.€€In€so€doing,€that€court€held:ÌÓÓÌà8 àIn€the€present€case€the€jurisdiction€of€the€criminal€court€over€StewartÏdepended,€in€so€far€as€pertinent€here,€upon€a€certain€fact,€to„wit,Ïhis€age.€€The€Trial€Court€made€inquiry€as€to€that€fact,€and€foundÏthat€Stewart€was€eighteen€years€old.€€This€finding€was€basedÏupon€Stewartððs€own€statement€to€his€Court€appointed€attorneyÏand€to€the€district€attorney.€€Such€being€the€situation,€the€CourtððsÏfinding€in€the€matter€is€conclusive€on€collateral€attack,€according€toÏthe€weight€of€authority.ÌÌÌòòBomaróó,€300€S.W.2d€at€889.ÌÓÓÌà àà àWe€conclude€that€the€original€trial€of€Appellant€which€led€to€hisÏconviction€of€aggravated€rape€necessarily€included€a€finding€by€the€trial€courtÏand€the€jury€that€venue,€and€by€necessity€jurisdiction,€of€the€offense€wasÏappropriately€in€Shelby€County,€Tennessee.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÌà àà àIn€his€other€issue,€Appellant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€byÏtreating€the€petition€for€habeas€corpus€as€a€petition€for€post„conviction€relief€andÏthereby€dismissing€it€due€to€being€filed€after€the€statute€of€limitations€had€expired.ÌÌà àà àThe€record€itself€reflects€that€this€issue€is€totally€without€merit.€€In€itsÏorder,€the€trial€court€found€that€at€most,€the€judgment€of€conviction€was€not€void,Ïbut€voidable,€and€therefore€the€petition€for€writ€of€habeas€corpus€should€beÏdenied.€€The€trial€court€merely€noted€that€it€had€authority€under€Tennessee€CodeÏAnnotated€section€40„30„205€to€treat€the€habeas€corpus€petition€as€a€petition€forÏpost„conviction€relief€under€proper€circumstances.€€However,€the€trial€courtÏspecifically€found€that€it€could€not€treat€the€Appellantððs€petition€as€one€for€post„conviction€relief€because€it€was€not€filed€within€the€statute€of€limitations€periodÏand€it€was€not€filed€in€the€court€of€the€county€of€conviction.€€ÌÌà àà àFinding€both€of€Appellantððs€issues€to€be€without€merit,€we€affirm€theÏjudgment€of€the€trial€court.ÌÓÓÇÌÌ›à àà àà àà àà à____________________________________à àà àà àà àà àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JudgeÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌJOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€JudgeÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌJERRY€L.€SMITH,€Judge