ÿWPC( Ë“wñÙ4i¶ þßÎKâ¼t¤°¦‘ÚÒÛ†ðL aYgéÁ”pb83µ0QT5>œ©6v;ëˆö©µz’èè\åM9‰RØùgçW½“ Üy£ú# >·éíÕÆ‹F˜J‰Â• XüUbÚCêÿ>š3”uÒÅ®^’ŠsÚø=u7å¼zN3N‡ÎuîîšÐñòÛ"Æ`’WI©¡h+ÃÜêêjÆŽ¿l>‡a·°ô€“??„¦‹Åª|Q-´/yܪ~b?åÿ‡ƒ§—YWµ®oêz¨.csíTnp‹àÁ³2ŽO²3]PHös®#Ó\ûSE7°5J³-²ãgßœP gVêYì©i=<´¯‡%çø…³|S^¿(“QÔpS<§ðÐÂ~‘ÿÎKàaÄäB ÍQ¦ãeO¤µ¿Î2ܬ <'–r,`ë…/w8U6ÆWß ÿðÝÖKÈnò˜ ú>qùù²af³|V›u`¬PÕ}Ç$oà:ø6JëñÍX/tŒwx¾Fçôõ„„Œ2›ß›kÒŸ=ŸØÖð¼P;o‡‰ô¾ÿ¬ô¯ÙtÀ$Pœé ˦"Tˆ¢´ÍÑAé›þ‹hв¥ð×GÃqŽìÝJyõÿUÚÑ÷*U.L %zb€U:„%¾¼ãŸ n­¯ \ 0(d U:Œ wÆ 4Ü ð 0™ 0Dž U:â  (% 0DM#!‘N²´^ »Ç mÉMà 0ä 0<øU>4 AQrÆÃ 0D‰ BÍ 0DêU:. D/h— Bž D3»U:î<þ6X9`(CourierX ù,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular Ý ƒ$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€X6†XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€Article€III€of€the€Act€provides€a€period€of€180€days€for€a€person€in€custodyÐ `  Ðof€a€party€state€to€be€tried€in€any€other€party€state€on€ð ðany€untried€indictment,Ïinformation€or€complaint€on€the€basis€of€which€a€detainer€has€been€lodgedÏagainst€the€prisoner.ðð€€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„31„101,€art.€III(a)€(1997).€€The€180„¼day€period€is€triggered€by€the€prisoner€ð ðhaving€caused€to€be€delivered€to€theÏprosecuting€officer€and€the€appropriate€court€of€the€prosecuting€officerððsÏjurisdiction€written€notice€of€the€place€of€the€personððs€imprisonment€and€requestÏfor€a€final€disposition€to€be€made€of€the€indictment,€information€or€complaint.ðð€€òòId.óó€Ð ªJ ÐIf€a€trial€does€not€occur€prior€to€the€return€of€the€prisoner€to€the€original€place€ofÏimprisonment,€the€court€shall€dismiss€with€prejudice€the€untried€indictment,Ïinformation€or€complaint.€€òòId.óó€at€art.€III(d). ²Ý ƒ$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€X6†XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€defendant€pleaded€guilty€to€count€1,€obtaining€money€under€falseÐ `  Ðpretenses,€and€no€mention€was€made€in€the€plea€agreement€about€theÏdisposition€of€count€2,€grand€larceny.€€Because€no€judgment€has€been€entered,Ïno€disposition€of€count€2€has€been€made.€€The€state€approved€the€count€1€pleaÏand€certain€sentencing€recommendations,€and€it€is€likely€that€the€partiesððÏagreement€included€€the€dismissal€of€count€2.€€We€point€out€to€the€trial€court€forÏits€information,€however,€that€count€2€is€still€pending€and€is€not€the€subject€of€aÏplea.3|x«<þ6X9`(CourierXôxþ6X@ɹ`7ûX@($¡¡, øð AZ"Arial RegularÓ€ {Z=' Ñ  Ñ(I(2„$¤¤Ý ƒ !ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÔ€X±XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular ÿÝ ƒd$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€X†FXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝòòSeeóó€n.1.€€A€withdrawal€of€the€guilty€plea€on€count€1€apparently€wouldÐ `  Ðleave€both€counts€of€the€indictment€unresolved.(3¯#$££Ý ƒ !ÝÝ  ݘHP LaserJet 8000 DN PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0 ýÝ ƒ!¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€$X6†XXXÔÔ€$_»X$X6†ÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€$X6†X$_»ÔÐ  ÐÌSeptember€22,€1999ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ós›#' ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ<llÿÿ:Default ParaÔ‡XXXÔÔS‡ô\  `&Times New RomanSÔÔS‡ô\  `&Times New RomanSÔÔ‡XXXÔ<ÿÿ:footnote refô\  `&Times New Roman !#(Cþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯#$¢¢Ý ƒ !ÝÝ  Ý d($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó,–ûyAZ‹"Arial Regular'''÷ÿ dxd ýÝ ƒ!¯#"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€)X±XXXÔÔ€)_ðX)X±ÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€)X±X)_ðÔÐ  ÐÌSeptember€20,€1999ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó óüÿP Pd""""'ÿÿdxd,–ûyAZ‹"Arial RegularÝ ƒ !ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ` °ÑÒ°ÒÓ  ÓÑTR[° AØ'Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€ X±XXXÔÑ8€ ± XXdædÈ8ÑÑ  ÑÑ€P¸Ññ ñññßr€(<,(j 8` `€€@EÈf ` ttx0` ð ærßñññ ññññ ñßr€&(<,(j 8` `€€@EÈf ` ttx0` ð ærßñ ñññÔ_ÔÌÑ€Ñò òññßt€&(>.*jx‚ÿÀ` `€€@EJ ` 8ttxP‚F ð À tßññà@˜ ˜ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ F æ ÐÌ€à@””(àAT€JACKSONˆÐ  ¾ ÐÌà@CC%àJULY€1999€SESSIONó óˆÐ ö – ÐÌÌÌò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à h àà À àà  àó ó)à p àÐ ”4  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àÐ €  Ðà ` àà ¸ àAppellee,à h àà À àà  à)à p àC.C.A.€No.€02C01„9902„CC„00075Ð f  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àÐ Lì  Ðvs.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àDyer€CountyÐ 2Ò  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àà È àÐ ¸  Ðò òJOSEPH€HART,€A.K.A,à h àà À àó óà  à)à p àHon.€Lee€Moore,€JudgeÐ þž  Ðò òALBERT€CROSSà  àà h àà À àà  àó ó)ò òÐ êŠ Ðó óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p à(Speedy€Trial€and€Interstateò òÐ Öv Ðó óà ` àà ¸ àAppellant.à h àà À àà  à)à p àCompact€on€Detainers)Ð ¼\ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à h àà À àà  àà p àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:Ð Tô ÐÌò òJOSEPH€ALBERT€HART€(pro€se)à  àà p àPAUL€G.€SUMMERS€à Ð àó óÐ  À ÐP.O.€Box€7001à  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAttorney€General€&€Reporter€Ð  ¬ ÐTaft,€CA€93268Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òPATRICIA€C.€KUSSMANó óÐ Ø!x Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àò òà  àó óà p à425€Fifth€Ave.€N.,€2d€FloorÐ ª#J Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òC.€PHILLIP€BIVENSó óÐ \&ü  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àò òà h àà À àà  àà p àó óDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÐ H'è! Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à115€E.€Market€StreetÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àP.O.€Box€EÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àDyersburg,€TN€38025„2005ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òà È àà  àà x àà Ð à¼à ` àÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:________________ÌÌó óÌò òAFFIRMED€IN€PART,€REVERSED€IN€PARTó ó€ò òAND€REMANDEDó óÐ ò4’+0 Ðò òÌÌJAMES€CURWOOD€WITT,€JR.,€JUDGEó óÐ ¶7V.3 ÐÌÌÌÐ T;ô17 ÐÓÓÐ °;P28ð Ðà@qq*àò òòòOPINIONó óóóˆÐ `  ÐÔ‡X6†XX X6†ÔÓ'X‚,¸ ˜X°œX'Óà ¸ àÔ#† X6†XXX6†f#ÔThe€defendant,€Joseph€Hart,€appeals€the€Dyer€County€Circuit€CourtððsÐ , Ì Ðdenial€of€his€motions€to€dismiss€the€1987€indictment€against€him€for€obtainingÏmoney€under€false€pretenses€and€grand€larceny.€€òòSeeóóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€39„3„Ð Äd Ð901,€„1101€(1982)€(repealed€1989).€Ô‡X6†XX X6†ÔThe€defendant€pleaded€guilty€to€obtainingÐ 0 Ðmoney€under€false€pretenses€on€December€5,€1990.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô#† X6†XXX6†#Ô€€The€trial€court€has€notÐ \ü  Ðimposed€a€sentence€on€the€defendant.€€In€this€appeal,€the€defendant€alleges€hisÏright€to€a€speedy€trial€has€been€violated€because€a€sentence€has€not€been€imposedÏduring€the€eight„year€period€since€his€guilty€plea.€€Additionally,€the€defendant€claims€Ïthe€indictments€against€him€should€be€dismissed€because€the€state€has€failed€toÏcomply€with€the€Interstate€Compact€on€Ô_ÔDetainersÔ_Ô€Act.׃À×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€After€a€review€of€the€record,Ð Xø Ðthe€briefs€of€the€parties,€and€the€applicable€law,€we€reverse€the€trial€courtððs€orderÏdismissing€the€defendantððs€speedy€trial€issue€and€remand€for€further€considerationÏconsistent€with€this€opinion,€and€we€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€order€dismissing€theÏdefendantððs€Interstate€Compact€on€Ô_ÔDetainersÔ_Ô€issue.ÌÔ‡X6†XX X6†ÔÌà ¸ àThe€defendant€pleaded€guilty€to€obtaining€money€under€falseÐ  &À  Ðpretenses€on€December€5,€1990.€€At€that€time,€a€sentencing€hearing€was€scheduledÐ ø ˜ Ðfor€February€11,€1991.€€The€defendant€failed€to€appear€for€the€rescheduledÐ Äd Ðsentencing€hearing€on€February€28,€1991,€and€a€Ô_ÔcapiasÔ_Ô€was€issued.€€In€AugustÐ 0 Ð1991,€the€defendant€was€taken€into€federal€custody€where€he€has€remained€sinceÐ \ü  Ðthat€time.€€On€May€12,€1992,€the€defendant€demanded€a€speedy€trial€in€the€trialÐ (È  Ðcourt.€€In€1994,€1996€and€1997,€the€Dyer€County€Sheriffððs€Department€was€notifiedÐ ô”  Ðof€the€defendantððs€location€in€federal€prison€and€tentative€release€dates.€€OnÐ À` ÐNovember€4,€1997,€the€Dyer€County€Sheriffððs€Department€requested€a€Ô_ÔdetainerÔ_Ô€beÐ Œ, Ðplaced€on€the€defendant,€and€this€request€was€granted€on€November€18,€1997€byÐ Xø Ðthe€institution€where€the€defendant€resided.Ð $Ä ÐÌà ¸ àThe€defendant€filed€a€òòpro€seóó€Motion€to€Dismiss€Indictments€on€July€20,Ð ¼ \ Ð1998€and€alleged€a€violation€of€his€right€to€a€speedy€trial.€€On€September€22,€1998,Ð Œ", Ðthe€defendant€filed€aòò€pro€seóó€Motion€for€Speedy€Trial€or€Speedy€Disposition€ofÐ X$ø ÐWarrants,€Information,€Ô_ÔDetainerÔ_Ô,€Indictment.€€The€trial€court€denied€the€defendantððsÐ (&È  Ðmotion€to€dismiss€the€indictment€of€obtaining€money€by€false€pretenses€by€findingÐ ô'”" Ðthe€defendantððs€right€to€a€speedy€trial€had€not€been€violated€because€the€defendantÐ À)` $ Ðpleaded€guilty.€€Subsequently,€the€defendant€filed€a€motion€to€reconsider€which€wasÐ Œ+,"& Ðdenied€by€the€trial€court€on€February€5,€1999.€€The€defendant€filed€a€notice€ofÐ X-ø#( Ðappeal€on€February€19,€1999.Ð $/Ä%* ÐÌà ¸ àThe€first€determination€which€must€be€made€is€whether€theÐ ¼2\). Ðdefendantððs€appeal€is€properly€before€this€court€at€this€time.€€Because€there€hasÐ ˆ4(+0 Ðbeen€no€sentence€imposed,€there€is€no€judgment€of€conviction€to€appeal.€€òòSeeóóÐ T6ô,2 ÐTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3(b);€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€37(b);€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(e)€(ð ðA€judgmentÐ  8À.4 Ðof€conviction€shall€set€forth€the€plea,€.€.€.,€and€the€adjudication€and€sentenceðð).€€ThisÐ ì9Œ06 Ðcase€is€still€pending€in€the€trial€court€until€a€sentence€is€imposed€upon€theÐ `  Ðdefendant.€€Accordingly,€the€defendantððs€appeal€can€only€be€before€this€court€as€aÐ , Ì ÐRule€10€extraordinary€appeal.€€Ð ø ˜ ÐÌà ¸ àÔ#† X<XXX†FŒ#ÔThis€court€may€treat€an€improperly€filed€Rule€3€appeal€as€a€Rule€10Ð 0 Ðextraordinary€appeal.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔLeathÔ_Ôóó,€977€S.W.2d€132,€135€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð p  Ð1998);€òòState€v.€James€Doeóó,€No.€01C01„9102„CR„00046,€slip€op.€at€5„6€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð Pð  ÐApp.,€Nashville,€June€29,€1992).€€Tennessee€Rule€of€Appellate€Procedure€10(a)Ð 0Ð  Ðprovides€that€an€extraordinary€appeal€may€be€sought€ð ðif€the€lower€court€has€so€farÐ ° Ðdeparted€from€the€accepted€and€usual€course€of€judicial€proceedings€as€to€requireÐ ð Ðimmediate€review€.€.€.€.ðð€€In€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔWilloughbyÔ_Ôóó,€594€S.W.2d€388,€392€(Tenn.€1980),Ð Ðp Ðour€supreme€court€held€that€an€extraordinary€appeal€should€only€be€granted€whenÐ °P Ðit€is€established€that:€(a)€the€ruling€of€the€court€below€represents€a€fundamentalÐ 0 Ðillegality,€(b)€the€ruling€constitutes€a€failure€to€proceed€according€to€the€essentialÐ p! Ðrequirements€of€the€law,€Ô_Ô(c)Ô_Ô€the€ruling€is€tantamount€to€the€denial€of€either€party€ofÐ P#ð Ða€day€in€court,€(d)€the€action€of€the€trial€judge€was€without€legal€authority,€(e)€theÐ 0%Ð Ðaction€of€the€trial€judge€constituted€a€plain€and€palpable€abuse€of€discretion,€or€(f)Ð '°  Ðeither€party€has€lost€a€right€or€interest€that€may€never€be€recaptured.€€Ð ð(" ÐÌà ¸ àWe€find€the€defendantððs€appeal€is€an€appropriate€case€to€grant€a€RuleÐ °,P#& Ð10€extraordinary€appeal€because€the€defendant€has€lost€a€right€or€interest€that€mayÐ .0%( Ðnever€be€recaptured.€€While€this€court€and€our€supreme€court€have€consistently€heldÐ p0'* Ðthat€there€is€no€legal€right€to€parole,€òòsee,€e.g.,óó€òòState€v.€Bushóó,€942€S.W.2d€489,€503Ð P2ð(, Ð(Tenn.€1997);€òòÔ_ÔKaylorÔ_Ô€v.€Bradleyóó,€912€S.W.2d€728,€733€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995)Ð 04Ð*. Ð(citing€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„28„117(a)€which€states€parole€is€"a€privilege€and€notÐ 6°,0 Ða€right"),€we€find€that€the€defendant,€while€not€having€a€right,€has€an€interest€in€beingÐ ð7.2 Ðparoled€from€the€federal€charges,€which€he€is€losing€with€the€passage€of€time€whileÐ Ð9p04 Ðhe€remains€Ô_ÔunsentencedÔ_Ô.€€Accordingly,€òòvia€Rule€10óó,€we€will€review€the€merits€of€hisÐ `  Ðclaims.Ð @ à ÐÌÓ  Óò òI.€Speedy€Trialó óÐ   ÐÓ  Óà ¸ àFirst,€the€defendant€alleges€his€right€to€a€speedy€trial€has€beenÐ à€ Ðviolated€because€a€sentence€has€not€been€imposed€during€the€eight„year€periodÐ À`  Ðsince€his€guilty€plea.€€The€defendant€contends€that€the€sentencing€phase€is€includedÐ  @  Ðin€the€right€to€a€speedy€trial.€€The€state€contends€that€the€defendantððs€right€to€aÐ €  Ðspeedy€trial€ceased€once€he€pleaded€guilty.€€Alternatively,€the€state€further€contendsÐ ` Ðthat€if€the€right€to€a€speedy€trial€extends€to€sentencing,€the€defendantððs€right€to€aÐ @à Ðspeedy€trial€was€not€violated.€€Ð  À ÐÌà ¸ àThe€United€States€and€Tennessee€Constitutions€guarantee€theÐ à€ Ðcriminally€accused€the€right€to€a€speedy€trial€in€all€criminal€prosecutions.€U.S.€Const.Ð À!` Ðamends.€XI€&€XIV;€Tenn.€Const.€art.€I,€ðð€9.€€The€right€to€a€speedy€trial€is€alsoÐ  #@ Ðstatutory€in€Tennessee.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„14„101€(1997).€€Whether€the€rightÐ €%  Ðto€a€speedy€trial€includes€the€sentencing€phase€has€not€been€directly€addressed€byÐ `'  Ðthe€United€States€Supreme€Court.€€However,€Supreme€Court€decisions€provideÐ @)à" Ðsome€limited€guidance.Ð  +À!$ ÐÌà ¸ àIn€one€decision,€the€Supreme€Court€assumed€that€the€sentencingÐ à.€%( Ðphase€was€included.€€In€òòPollard€v.€United€Statesóó,€352€U.S.€354,€77€S.€Ct.€481Ð À0`'* Ð(1957),€the€defendant€pleaded€guilty€to€a€charge€of€embezzlement.€€òòId.óó€at€355,€77Ð  2@), ÐS.€Ct.€at€482.€€The€trial€court€failed€to€sentence€Pollard€while€he€was€in€theÐ €4 +. Ðcourtroom,€but€after€Pollard€left€the€courtroom€and€the€prosecutor€asked€the€trialÐ `6-0 Ðcourt€about€Pollard's€sentence,€the€trial€court€sentenced€Pollard€to€probationÐ @8à.2 Ðcommencing€after€his€release€from€an€unrelated€charge.€€òòId.óó€at€356,€77€S.€Ct.€Ô_ÔatÐ  :À04 Ð483.€€Because€the€sentence€was€imposed€after€the€defendant€had€left€theÐ `  Ðcourtroom,€it€was€void.€€òòId.óó,€77€S.€Ct.€at€483.€€Nearly€two€years€later,€Pollard€violatedÐ @ à Ðthe€terms€of€his€probation€and€was€brought€before€the€trial€court.€€òòId.óó€at€356„57,€77Ð  À ÐS.€Ct.€at€483.€€The€trial€court€set€aside€the€original€judgment€and€sentenced€PollardÐ   Ðto€two€years€imprisonment.€€òòId.óó€at€357,€77€S.€Ct.€at€483.€€Pollard€appealed€theÐ à€ Ðconviction,€and€the€Supreme€Court€considered€whether€his€Sixth€Amendment€rightÐ À`  Ðto€a€speedy€trial€was€violated.€€òòId.óó€at€359,€77€S.€Ct.€at€484.€€In€addressing€this€issue,Ð  @  Ðthe€Supreme€Court€assumed€"òòÔ_ÔarguendoÔ_Ôóó€that€Ô_Ôsentenc[ingÔ_Ô]€is€part€of€the€trial€forÐ €  Ðpurposes€of€the€Sixth€Amendment."€€òòId.óó€at€361,€77€S.€Ct.€at€486.€€The€SupremeÐ ` ÐCourt€affirmed€the€sentence€and€held€that€the€trial€court€promptly€corrected€its€errorÐ @à Ðand€that€any€delay€was€not€purposeful€or€oppressive.€€òòId.óó€at€361„62,€77€S.€Ct.€atÐ  À Ð486.Ð   ÐÑ  ÑÌÑ  Ñà ¸ àMany€state€and€federal€courts€have€concluded€that€sentencingÐ À!` Ðproceedings€are€part€of€the€Sixth€Amendment€speedy€trial€provision.€€€The€courtsÐ  #@ Ðthat€found€sentencing€to€be€included€in€the€speedy€trial€protection€have€relied€onÐ €%  ÐòòPollardóó.€€òòSee,óó€òòe.g.,óó€òòÔ_ÔBurkettÔ_Ô€v.€Cunninghamóó,€826€F.2d€1208,€1220€(3d€Cir.€1987);Ð `'  ÐòòPerez€v.€Sullivanóó,€793€F.2d€249,€253€(10th€Cir.€1986);€òòUnited€States€v.€Reeseóó,€568Ð @)à" ÐF.2d€1246,€1252„53€(6th€Cir.€1977)€(court€analyzed€sentencing€delay€as€speedy€trialÐ  +À!$ Ðviolation€without€explicitly€finding€that€the€sentencing€phase€was€included€in€speedyÐ - #& Ðtrial€protection);€òòJuarez„Ô_ÔCasaresÔ_Ô€v.€United€Statesóó,€496€F.2d€190,€192€(5th€Cir.€1974);Ð à.€%( ÐòòUnited€States€v.€Ô_ÔTortorelloÔ_Ôóó,€391€F.2d€587,€589€(2d€Cir.€1968)€(per€Ô_ÔcuriamÔ_Ô);€òòGonzalesÐ À0`'* Ðv.€Stateóó,€582€P.2d€630,€632„33€(Alaska€1978).€€òòBut€seeóó€òòState€v.€Johnsonóó,€363€So.2dÐ  2@), Ð458€(La.€1978).Ð €4 +. ÐÌà ¸ àOur€supreme€court€has€considered€the€scope€of€proceedingsÐ @8à.2 Ðencompassing€the€right€to€a€speedy€trial.€€òòSeeóó€òòAllen€v.€Stateóó,€505€S.W.2d€715Ð  :À04 Ð(Tenn.€1974).€€In€òòAllenóó,€the€defendant,€incarcerated€on€another€conviction,Ð `  Ðexperienced€a€two„and„one„half€year€delay€before€his€probation€revocation€hearing.€Ð @ à ÐòòId.óó€at€716„17.€€In€deciding€that€the€defendant's€right€to€a€speedy€trial€included€theÐ  À Ðprobation€revocation€hearing,€our€supreme€court€held€that€the€probation€revocationÐ   Ðproceeding€is€a€continuation€of€the€original€criminal€prosecution.€€òòId.óó€at€719.€Ð à€ ÐÌà ¸ àBecause€sentencing€must€occur€before€a€probation€revocationÐ  @  Ðhearing,€the€constitutional€right€to€a€speedy€trial€necessarily€includes€the€sentencingÐ €  Ðphase.€€Accordingly,€we€apply€the€constitutional€speedy€trial€provision€to€theÐ ` Ðpending€sentencing€procedure€in€the€present€case.Ð @à ÐÌà ¸ àIn€determining€whether€a€criminal€defendantððs€right€to€a€speedy€trialÐ   Ðhas€been€violated,€the€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€has€adopted€the€approachÐ à€ Ðannounced€by€the€United€States€Supreme€Court€in€òòBarker€v.€Ô_ÔWingoÔ_Ôóó,€407€U.S.€514,Ð À!` Ð92€S.€Ct.€2182€(1972).€€Under€the€òòBarkeróó€analysis,€four€factors€determine€whetherÐ  #@ Ða€defendantððs€right€to€a€speedy€trial€has€been€violated.€€The€factors€are€(1)€theÐ €%  Ðlength€of€the€delay,€(2)€the€reason€for€the€delay,€(3)€whether€the€defendant€assertedÐ `'  Ðhis€right€to€a€speedy€trial,€and€(4)€whether€the€defendant€has€suffered€prejudice€fromÐ @)à" Ðany€delay.€€òòState€v.€Bishopóó,€493€S.W.2d€81,€84€(Tenn.€1973).€€On€appellate€review,Ð  +À!$ Ðthe€trial€courtððs€determination€in€this€regard€is€subject€to€review€for€abuse€ofÐ - #& Ðdiscretion.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Jeffersonóó,€938€S.W.2d€1,€9€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€Ð à.€%( ÐÌà ¸ àDelays€of€more€than€a€year€automatically€trigger€further€inquiry€underÐ  2@), Ðthe€other€òòBarkeróó€factors.€€òòState€v.€Utleyóó,€956€S.W.2d€489,€494€(Tenn.€1997),€òòStateÐ €4 +. Ðv.€Vickersóó,€985€S.W.2d€1,€5€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€(1997).€€Tennessee€Code€AnnotatedÐ `6-0 Ðsection€40„35„209€requires€the€trial€court€to€conduct€a€sentencing€hearing€ð ðwithoutÐ @8à.2 Ðunreasonable€delay,€but€in€no€event€more€than€forty„five€(45)€daysðð€after€acceptanceÐ  :À04 Ѐof€a€guilty€plea.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40„35„209(a)€(1997).€€Ð `  ÐÌà ¸ àA€review€of€the€existing€record€shows€that€the€defendant€hasÐ  À Ðpresented€a€claim€upon€which€relief€might€be€granted€if€the€claim€is€established€byÐ   Ðproof€upon€a€hearing.Ð à€ ÐÌà ¸ àThe€defendant€entered€a€guilty€plea€on€December€5,€1990,€withÐ  @  Ðsentencing€set€for€February€1991.€€The€defendant€had€not€yet€been€sentenced€atÐ €  Ðthe€time€the€trial€court€denied€his€motion€to€dismiss€for€lack€of€a€speedy€trial€inÐ ` ÐJanuary,€1999.€€Therefore,€the€delay€in€sentencing€is€about€eight€years.€€This€factorÐ @à Ðwould€€weigh€against€the€state.Ð  À ÐÌà ¸ àThe€reason€for€the€delay€can€be€partially€attributed€to€the€defendant.€Ð à€ ÐHe€failed€to€appear€for€sentencing€in€February€1991.€€He€was€taken€into€federalÐ À!` Ðcustody€in€August€1991€on€an€unrelated€charge.€€He€filed€his€first€demand€for€aÐ  #@ Ðspeedy€trial€in€May€1992.€€The€reason€for€the€delay€in€sentencing€for€the€time€inÐ €%  Ðwhich€the€defendant€failed€to€appear€for€sentencing€until€he€requested€a€speedy€trialÐ `'  Ðmust€be€attributed€to€the€defendant.€€He€cannot€now€complain€of€not€receiving€aÐ @)à" Ðspeedy€trial€for€the€time€in€which€he€was€at€fault€for€avoiding€the€court.€€òòSeeóó€òòe.g.óó,Ð  +À!$ ÐòòState€v.€Tayloróó,€771€S.W.2d€387,€399€(Tenn.€1989)€(no€speedy€trial€violationÐ - #& Ðbecause€the€delay€was€the€result€of€defendantððs€action).Ð à.€%( ÐÌà ¸ àThe€reason€for€the€delay€after€the€defendant€was€incarcerated€and€firstÐ  2@), Ðrequested€a€speedy€trial€in€1992€is€not€clear€from€the€record.€€The€state€was€awareÐ €4 +. Ðof€the€defendantððs€federal€incarceration€because€it€was€in€contact€with€federal€Ð `6-0 Ðofficials€regarding€the€defendantððs€tentative€release€date€from€as€early€as€1994.€€AtÐ @8à.2 Ðthis€juncture,€the€state€offers€no€explanation€for€failing€to€transport€the€defendant€toÐ  :À04 ÐÑP¸ Ñâ âÑ  Ñâ âÑ  ÑTennessee€in€order€for€a€sentencing€hearing€to€be€conducted;€however,€at€aÐ `  Ðhearing,€the€state€would€have€the€opportunity€to€prove€justification€or€excuse€for€theÐ @ à Ðdelay.€Ð  À ÐÌà ¸ àThe€defendant€asserted€his€right€to€a€speedy€trial€in€1992€and€againÐ à€ Ðin€1998.€€As€the€òòBarkeróó€court€noted,€the€ð ðdefendantððs€assertion€of€his€speedy€trialÐ À`  Ðright€.€.€.€is€entitled€to€strong€evidentiary€weight€in€determining€whether€theÐ  @  Ðdefendant€is€being€deprived€of€the€right.ðð€€òòBarkeróó,€407€U.S.€at€531„32,€92€S.€Ct.€atÐ €  Ð2192„93.€€The€state€was€aware€that€the€defendant€wanted€to€have€a€sentencingÐ ` Ðhearing€and€finish€these€proceedings€in€1992.€€The€Supreme€Court€has€declaredÐ @à Ðthat€the€state€has€ð ða€constitutional€duty€to€make€a€diligent,€good„faith€effort€to€bringÐ  À Ðhim€[to]€trial.ðð€€òòSmith€v.€Hooeyóó,€303€U.S.€374,€383,€89€S.€Ct.€575,€579€(1969).€Ð   ÐÌà ¸ àThe€defendant€asserts€that€he€has€been€prejudiced€by€this€delay€inÐ À!` Ðsentencing.€€However,€because€the€trial€court€decided€the€defendantððs€motionsÐ  #@ Ðwithout€a€hearing,€the€defendant€was€not€afforded€the€opportunity€to€presentÐ €%  Ðevidence€of€prejudice.€€Our€supreme€court€has€held€that€showing€prejudice€is€theÐ `'  Ðmost€important€part€of€the€òòBarkeróó€weighing€process.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Woodóó,€924Ð @)à" ÐS.W.2d€342,€348€(Tenn.€1996).€Ð  +À!$ ÐÌà ¸ àThe€defendant€is€currently€serving€a€sentence€in€a€federal€prison.€€HeÐ à.€%( Ðclaims€that€he€has€been€prejudiced€because€he€is€subject€to€an€increased€securityÐ À0`'* Ðclassification;€he€has€been€incarcerated€with€violent€offenders,€even€though€he€hasÐ  2@), Ðnot€committed€any€violent€crime;€he€has€been€denied€access€to€rehabilitativeÐ €4 +. Ðprograms;€and€he€has€been€denied€federal€parole.€€Additionally,€he€correctly€statesÐ `6-0 Ðthat€the€possibility€of€concurrent€state€and€federal€sentences€is€being€lost€as€heÐ @8à.2 Ðnears€completion€of€his€current€federal€incarceration.€€Ð  :À04 ÐÔ_Ô‡à ¸ àThe€defendant€also€asserts€that€until€he€is€sentenced,€he€can,€uponÐ `  Ða€showing€of€any€fair€and€just€reason,€withdraw€his€guilty€plea.€€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.Ð @ à Ð32(f).€€If€he€were€to€withdraw€his€plea,€he€would€be€subject€to€a€trial€on€the€charge.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ׀Р À ÐConsidering€that€the€defendant€has€not€been€afforded€an€opportunity€to€presentÐ   Ðevidence€supporting€his€claims,€the€weight€of€the€factor€of€prejudice€cannot€beÐ à€ Ðdetermined.€Ð À`  ÐÌà ¸ àAfter€considering€these€factors,€we€conclude€that€the€defendant€hasÐ €  Ðstated€a€presentable€claim€for€consideration€of€a€deprivation€of€speedy€trial€rights.€Ð ` ÐWe€reverse€the€trial€courtððs€order€dismissing€the€defendantððs€speedy€trial€claimÐ @à Ðwithout€a€hearing€and€remand€this€case€to€the€trial€court€so€that€either€party€may€Ð  À Ðoffer€evidence€on€this€issue.€€Ð   ÐÌà ¸ àThe€defendant€raised,€but€did€not€provide€appellate€argument€on,€theÐ À!` Ðissue€of€a€due€process€violation€because€of€the€delay€in€sentencing.€For€purposesÐ  #@ Ðof€this€appeal,€that€issue€has€been€waived.€€We€leave€it€to€the€defendant€to€developÐ €%  Ðany€due€process€violation€claim€on€remand.Ð `'  ÐÌÓN1Ü,X„ÜŒ ä <”ìDœôL¤ü!X‚,¸ ˜XNÓÓ  Óò òII.€Interstate€Compact€on€Detainersó óÐ  +À!$ ÐÓ  Óà ¸ àThe€defendant€contends€the€indictments€against€him€should€beÐ - #& Ðdismissed€because€the€state€failed€to€comply€with€the€Interstate€Compact€onÐ à.€%( ÐDetainers€Act€(the€"Act").€€The€Act€is€an€agreement€between€the€United€States€andÐ À0`'* Ðthe€states€which€have€adopted€the€Act€and€among€the€individual€states€which€haveÐ  2@), Ðadopted€it.€€The€purpose€of€the€Act€is€ð ðto€encourage€the€expeditious€and€orderlyÐ €4 +. Ðdisposition€of€[outstanding]€charges€and€determination€of€the€proper€status€of€anyÐ `6-0 Ðand€all€detainers€based€on€òòuntriedóó€indictments,€informations€or€complaints.ðð€€Tenn.Ð `  ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„31„101,€art.€I€(1997)€(emphasis€added).€€Article€III€of€the€ActÐ @ à Ðrequires€that€if€a€person€has€any€"pending€.€.€.€untried€indictment,€information€orÐ  À Ðcomplaint€.€.€.,€the€person€shall€be€brought€to€trial€within€one€hundred€eighty€(180)Ð   Ðdays€after"€requesting€a€final€disposition.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„31„101,€art.€IIIÐ à€ Ð(1997).Ð À`  ÐÌà ¸ àThe€Supreme€Court€has€held€that€Article€III€of€the€Act€does€not€applyÐ €  Ðto€detainers€based€on€probation€violation€charges.€€òòCarchman€v.€Nashóó,€473€U.S.Ð ` Ð716,€734,€105€S.€Ct.€3401,€3410„11€(1985).€€The€Court€relied€on€the€plain€languageÐ @à Ðof€the€Act€in€reaching€its€conclusion.€€òòId.óó,€105€S.€Ct.€at€3410„11.€€Article€III€appliesÐ  À Ðto€any€pending€"untried€indictment,€information€or€complaint."€€òòId.óó€at€718„19,€105€S.Ð   ÐCt.€at€3402„03.€€The€natural€interpretation€of€this€language€is€that€Article€III€appliesÐ à€ Ðonly€to€matters€that€can€be€brought€to€a€full€criminal€trial,€that€is,€pending€criminalÐ À!` Ðcharges€or€charges€being€prosecuted.€€òòId.óó€at€724„25,€105€S.€Ct.€at€3405„06.€€TheÐ  #@ ÐòòCarchmanóó€majority€held€that€a€probation€violation€fell€outside€Article€III€because€theÐ €%  ÐArticle€III€language€applied€to€the€guilt€phase€of€criminal€trials.€€òòId.óó€at€725„26,€105Ð `'  ÐS.€Ct.€at€3406.€€The€Court€found€that€a€probation€violation€hearing€would€determineÐ @)à" Ðwhether€the€probation€conditions€should€be€modified€or€the€probationer€should€beÐ  +À!$ Ðresentenced.€€òòId.óó,€105€S.€Ct.€at€3406.€€In€either€case,€the€probationer€would€not€beÐ - #& Ðentitled€to€"the€panoply€of€due€process€rights€accorded€a€defendant€at€a€criminalÐ à.€%( Ðtrial.ðð€€òòId.óó,€105€S.€Ct.€at€3406.€€Ð À0`'* ÐÌà ¸ àThe€dissent€in€òòCarchmanóó€felt€that€Article€III's€reference€to€"trial"Ð €4 +. Ðembodied€the€broad€concept€of€"final€disposition,"€òòId.óó€at€744,€105€S.€Ct.€at€3416Ð `6-0 Ð(Brennan,€J.,€dissenting),€but€we€agree€with€the€òòCarchmanóó€majority€that€Article€IIIÐ @8à.2 Ðapplies€only€to€untried€criminal€charges.€€Although€òòCarchmanóó€did€not€Ô_ÔspecificallyÐ  :À04 Ðaddress€at€which€point€a€criminal€charge€becomes€untried,€we€hold€that€after€theÐ `  Ðguilt€phase€is€completed,€the€charges€are€no€longer€untried€for€purposes€of€ArticleÐ @ à ÐIII.€€This€position€is€consistent€with€the€finding€in€òòÔ_ÔCarchmanÔ_Ôóó€that€the€resentencingÐ  À Ðfunction€of€probation€revocation€is€outside€the€ambit€of€Article€III.€€òòId.óó€at€725„26,€105Ð   ÐS.€Ct.€at€3406.€€Ð à€ ÐÌà ¸ àThe€above€position€is€consistent€with€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔEvittsÔ_Ôóó,€915€S.W.2d€468Ð  @  Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995),€where€this€court€held€the€Act€did€not€apply€to€a€defendantÐ €  Ðwho€had€pleaded€guilty,€received€judicial€diversion,€violated€the€terms€of€hisÐ ` Ðdiversion,€and€was€awaiting€sentencing.€€The€defendant€in€òòÔ_ÔEvittsÔ_Ôóó€was€in€jail€inÐ @à Ðanother€jurisdiction€when€he€sought€to€invoke€Article€III€of€the€Act€and€be€sentencedÐ  À Ðwithin€180€days€of€his€request€for€final€disposition.€€òòId.óó€at€469„70.€€This€court€heldÐ   Ðthat€the€remaining€proceeding€against€the€defendant€was€not€an€"untried€indictment,Ð à€ Ðinformation,€or€complaint."€€òòId.óó€at€470€(quoting€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„31„101,€art.Ð À!` ÐIII(a)).€€òòSeeóó€òòalsoóó€òòState€v.€Hillóó,€875€S.W.2d€278€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).Ð  #@ ÐÌà ¸ àWe€also€note€that€the€proceedings€which€constitute€a€trial€for€theÐ `'  Ðconstitutional€right€to€a€speedy€trial€are€not€necessarily€the€same€proceedings€toÐ @)à" Ðwhich€Article€III€applies.€€While€there€is€some€similarity€in€purposes€and€policyÐ  +À!$ Ðbehind€the€constitutional€and€statutory€rights,€there€is€not€enough€to€warrant€theÐ - #& Ðbroad€definition€of€trial€as€required€for€the€constitutional€right.€€Ð à.€%( ÐÌà ¸ àIn€this€case,€the€defendant€pleaded€guilty€in€1990€to€the€indictment€forÐ  2@), Ðobtaining€money€by€false€pretenses.€€Accordingly,€this€indictment€was€no€longerÐ €4 +. Ðð ðuntried.ðð€€The€state€lodged€a€Ô_ÔdetainerÔ_Ô€on€the€defendant€in€1997€for€the€purpose€ofÐ `6-0 Ðsentencing.€€The€Interstate€Compact€on€Ô_ÔDetainersÔ_Ô€does€not€apply€to€the€defendantððsÐ @8à.2 Ðsentencing€Ô_ÔdetainerÔ_Ô.Ð  :À04 Їà ¸ àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€dismissing€the€speedy€trial€claim€isÐ `  Ðreversed.€€Otherwise,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€€The€case€isÐ @ à Ðremanded€to€the€trial€court€for€further€proceedings.Ð  À ÐÌÓÓà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à________________________________Ð à€ Ðà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJAMES€CURWOOD€WITT,€JR.,€JUDGEÐ Ðp  ÐÌÌÌCONCUR:Ð 0  ÐÌÌÌ_______________________________Ð Pð ÐJOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€JUDGEÐ @à ÐÌÌ_______________________________Ð ° ÐJOHN€EVERETT€WILLIAMS,€JUDGE