WPCf =8v6ʬ7Fi _FXq o`3i6(D$՛ڿzUUzm]%*#/ >"p'0-p7Y3&A};Gچv i3I0(3#NeAs9?l40WKcȣ&'PPt`=>hbI(i7wؤOfSavhLE -Kb9 gE嵏iROQ0pxowd˂ $-GK+ 5l4ӺJ|f6!lsz#E3TEo,H1[}Ao5}E1N b$\oc:O%!VnSwSJ#a134Q :)bqKEƿs+ɤq,7~X\@|xLSQ/# F UNQ % 0( U: b w@ 4O c 0r 0D8 | a 7U:OU:@7zU:U: B----------- D3JJJ 0D}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} AO 0D D/ BIHP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLh(9 Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($,|AZ"Arial Regular- - 34U56U7e8D9:E;<ӀuM%\\\..`3|xE(v(2o$ !  XXgXXXXXg `   0  (#$  0   XgXXXR XXg   Ad FILEDXgX R  April8,1999CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerkdAM    '$XXc XXX  XXc `   1    Therationaleforthisconclusionisthatthe waiveroffitnessforprobation[containedin `  40-36-106(c)]ismeaningless,unlessthenormalstatutorycriteriaforprobationapplytosubsection(c)participants.Staten,787S.W.2dat936. -  '$XXc XXX  XXc `   2    AlthoughAppelleeconcedesthatheisnoteligiblefortheCommunityCorrectionsProgramunder `  existingstatutoryandcaselaw,AppelleeclaimsthatexcludinghimfromtheprogramviolateshisconstitutionalrighttodueprocessandcontravenestheintentthelegislaturehadwhenitenactedtheCommunityCorrectionsAct.However,Appelleehasfailedtocitetotherecordortoanyauthorityinsupportofthisconclusoryallegation,andweareunpersuadedthateitherthefederalorstateconstitutionsprohibitthelegislaturefromsettingtheeligibilitystandardsforthecommunitycorrectionsprograminthemannernowprovided.,cAZ"Arial Regular   '$XXc XXX  XXc `   1    Therationaleforthisconclusionisthatthe waiveroffitnessforprobation[containedin `  40-36-106(c)]ismeaningless,unlessthenormalstatutorycriteriaforprobationapplytosubsection(c)participants.Staten,787S.W.2dat936.,cAZ"Arial Regular -  '$XXc XXX  XXc `   2    AlthoughAppelleeconcedesthatheisnoteligiblefortheCommunityCorrectionsProgramunder `  existingstatutoryandcaselaw,AppelleeclaimsthatexcludinghimfromtheprogramviolateshisconstitutionalrighttodueprocessandcontravenestheintentthelegislaturehadwhenitenactedtheCommunityCorrectionsAct.However,Appelleehasfailedtocitetotherecordortoanyauthorityinsupportofthisconclusoryallegation,andweareunpersuadedthateitherthefederalorstateconstitutionsprohibitthelegislaturefromsettingtheeligibilitystandardsforthecommunitycorrectionsprograminthemannernowprovided.,cAZ"Arial Regular,cAZ"Arial Regular d'dxd(3$ !  -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd !  <77<` bXXXbTR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7XXdd7      <r *<,(j 8` `@Ef ` 8ttxP,`  rߛ<INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE `  ATNASHVILLENOVEMBERSESSION,1998  STATEOFTENNESSEE,  )  C.C.A.NO.01C019802CC00064 `  `     h   ) `  ` Appell8ee89ant9,   h   ) X   `     h   ) `     h   )  WILLIAMSONCOUNTY X  VS. `     h   )   X   `     h   )  HON.DONALDP.HARRIS  X   ANDREL.HENDERSON,   )  JUDGE  X   `     h   )  X  ` Appell:ant:;ee;.   h   )  (DirectAppealAggravatedRobbery) X      FORTHEAPPELLANT: h     FORTHEAPPELLEE: 8 LARRYD.DROLSUM h     JOHNKNOXWALKUP (  AssistantPublicDefender    AttorneyGeneralandReporter  ! 407C.MainStreet h  " P.O.Box68   h     DARYLJ.BRAND # Franklin,TN370650068    SeniorCounsel $  `     h     KIMR.HELPER `     h     LegalAssistant `     h     425FifthAvenueNorth `     h     Nashville,TN372430493 `     h     JOED.BAUGH,JR. `     h     DistrictAttorneyGeneral `     h     DEREKSMITH `     h     AssistantDistrictAttorney `     h     P.O.Box937 `     h     Franklin,TN370650937OPINIONFILED________________________REVERSEDANDREMANDEDJERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE  `8/0   pXOPINION #Xp} # `     ` OnNovember24,1997,AppelleeAndreL.Hendersonpledguiltytoonecountofaggravatedrobbery.FollowingatwodaysentencinghearingonJanuary9and20,1998,thetrialcourtsentencedAppelleeasaRangeIstandardoffendertoeightyearsintheCommunityCorrectionsProgram.OnJanuary22,1998,theStatefiledamotiontoreconsidersentence.Afterahearing,thetrialcourtdeniedthemotion.TheStatechallengesthedenialofitsmotion,raisingthefollowingissue:whetheradefendantwhoisconvictedofaggravatedrobberycanbesentencedtoatermintheCommunityCorrectionsProgram.Afterareviewoftherecord,wereversethejudgmentofthetrialcourt.@II, FACTS   !  ` OnJune11,1997,AppelleeenteredtheHamptonInnandSuitesinFranklin,Tennessee,wearingastockingoverhisheadandconcealingoneofhisarmswithatowelandtheotherarmwithasock.Appelleethengrabbedoneoftheemployeesbythearmandpulledheroverbythecashregister.TheemployeethenopenedthecashregisterbecauseshebelievedthatAppelleehadagunandwouldshoother.Aftertheemployeeopenedthecashregister,Appellanttookmoneyfromthedrawerandfledthesceneinavehicle.Appelleewasapprehendedshortlythereafter.; ; \8.0 Ї@* ANALYSIS  `   ` TheStatecontendsthatthetrialcourterredwhenitsentencedAppelleetoCommunityCorrections.Specifically,theStatecontendsthatAppelleewasstatutorilyineligibletoparticipateintheCommunityCorrectionsProgram.Weagree. ` EligibilityfortheCommunityCorrectionsProgramisgovernedbysection4036106whichstates,inrelevantpart:330 ` (a)Anoffenderwhomeetsallofthefollowingminimumcriteriashallbeconsideredeligibleforpunishmentinthecommunityundertheprovisionsofthischapter: ` T$` T$ 0 ` 0 ` T$` T$0 T$ T$.... T$T$ 0 ` 0 ` T$` T$(2)Personswhoareconvictedofproperty-related,ordrug/alcohol-relatedfelonyoffensesorotherfelonyoffensesnotinvolvingcrimesagainstthepersonasprovidedintitle39,chapter13,parts1-5;  T$ T$ 0 ` 0 ` T$` T$(3)Personswhoareconvictedofnonviolentfelonyoffenses;4  T$ T$ 433Tenn.CodeAnn.4036106(a)(Supp.1998).ThereisnoquestionthatbecauseAppelleepledguiltytotheviolentfelonyoffenseofaggravatedrobberyunderTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection3913402,AppelleeisnoteligiblefortheCommunityCorrectionsProgramunder4036106(a). ` However,anoffenderwhodoesnotmeettheminimumcriteriaunder40-36-106(a)maystillbeeligibleforCommunityCorrectionsunder40-36-106(c),whichstates:550 ` (c)Felonyoffendersnototherwiseeligibleundersubsection(a),andwhowouldbeusuallyconsideredunfitforprobationduetohistoriesofchronicalcohol,drugabuse,ormentalhealthproblems,butwhosespecialneedsaretreatableandcouldbeservedbestinthecommunityratherthaninacorrectionalinstitution,maybeconsideredeligibleforpunishmentinthe communityundertheprovisionsofthischapter.8/1` T$` T$ 55Tenn.CodeAnn.4036106(c)(Supp.1998).ThisCourthaspreviouslystated thatinordertobeeligiblefortheCommunityCorrectionsProgramunder4036106(c),adefendantmustfirstbestatutorilyeligibleforprobation.Statev. @  Grigsby,957S.W.2d541,546(Tenn.Crim.App.1997);Statev.Boston,938 0 S.W.2d435,438(Tenn.Crim.App.1996);Statev.Staten,787S.W.2d934,936   (Tenn.Crim.App.1989).7 777  #  1      ׀TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035303(a)   expresslystatesthat adefendantshallnotbeeligibleforprobationundertheprovisionsofthischapterifthedefendantisconvictedofaviolationof...3913402....Tenn.CodeAnn.4035303(a)(1997).Thus,thereisnoquestionthatAppelleewasnoteligiblefortheCommunityCorrectionsProgramunder4036106(c).7777  #  2      ׀ `  ` Inshort,AppelleewasclearlyineligiblefortheCommunityCorrectionsProgramunderboth4036106(a)and(c).Accordingly,wereversethejudgmentofthetrialcourtandweremandthiscaseforfurtherproceedingsconsistentwiththisopinion./&#Xc XX X&_#&/0&#k XXcP#&0   `     h   ____________________________________ `     h   JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE66  0&( CONCUR:___________________________________GARYR.WADE,PRESIDINGJUDGE___________________________________JOHNH.PEAY,JUDGE