WPC *u˽i!\>+7xpMTӄ=TͺeZ1DԘke y:*aA/6#[;lV<>2K$\ʟҘz<Ѽ{ĺB:Ԟe1mvKYi>~Mظ Y4lKȜ4*+A9"荇P"'ve] WPonQ'3h3z#l'v)'3v h6q qB"AbM |]<Ҟ_*H%*!?"M#iawN|aoTkJ|3I1"~pM,Z$D07>qu-KĐRbvL ģ@[7U@"REN͇Y/A8'nՒW Ҁ|n*Cp z~qd e-KQ%]{X;U 4F %z b  n 0E 4' U:; # u  w@  0& 0DU: BUUUUUUUUUUU D3rrr 0D AO88 0D D/B Bq<6X9`(Courier 10X- -3|x<6X9`(Courier 10Xx6X@29X@($  TR[A'LEGAL3'A' Legal3'T  X XXXX XXX uM%-^AZ"Arial RegularHP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLh EEfDeӀ XXXX'~XX   Ad FILEDXX'~  December18,1998CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerkdAM ((3n$ !  TR[A'LEGAL3'A' Legal3'T  XXXXXXXX      0  (#$  0  ,cAZ"Arial Regular d'dxd(3$ !  -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd !  TR[A'LEGAL3'A' Legal3'T  XXXXXXXX  7XXdd7  XNXX*INr *<,(j 8` `@E ` 8ttxPX  rߛ@ D XX*IINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @rr)DATNASHVILLEo[X` hDp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?ACXoELISEOHERNANDEZ, h    D ) t  `     h    D ) p C.C.A.NO.01C019805CR00228 `   ` Appellant,   h    D ) p (No.95B770Below) L   `     h    D ) p DAVIDSONCOUNTY  8  VS. `     h    D ) $ t  `     h    D ) p TheHon.SethNorman(byinterchange)  ` STATEOFTENNESSEE, h    D )  L    `     h    D )  p (DismissalofPostConvictionPetition)   8   ` Appellee.   h    D ) $   `     h    D ) p AFFIRMEDPURSUANTTORULE20   @kk+DORDER     `  ThismatterisbeforetheCourtuponthestatesmotionrequestingthatthejudgmentintheabovestyledcausebeaffirmedpursuanttoRule20,TennesseeCourtofCriminalAppealsRules.Thepetitioneropposesthemotion. `  ItappearsthatinJune1995,thepetitionerpledguiltytoaggravatedburglaryandreceivedasentenceofthreeyearsasaRangeI,standardoffender.ThepetitionerfiledhispostconvictionpetitiononMarch23,1998.Subsequently,onApril13,1998,thetrialcourtdismissedthepetitionasoutsidethestatuteoflimitation.Weaffirm. `  PursuanttoT.C.A.4030206(a),apetitionermustpetitionforpostconvictionreliefwithinoneyearofthedateofthefinalactionofthehigheststateappellatecourttowhichanappealwastaken.UnderT.C.A.4030202(b),acourtdoesnothavejurisdictiontoconsiderapetitionforpostconvictionreliefifitwasfiledoutsidetheoneyearstatuteoflimitationunless(1)theclaiminthepetitionisbaseduponafinalrulingofanappellatecourtestablishingaconstitutionalrightthatwasnotrecognizedasexistingatthetimeoftrial,ifretrospectiveapplicationofthatrightisrequired;(2)theclaiminthepetitionisbaseduponnewscientificevidenceestablishingthatsuchpetitionerisactuallyinnocentoftheoffenseoroffensesforwhichthepetitionerwasconvicted;or(3)theclaiminthepetitionseeksrelieffromasentencethatwasenhancedbecauseofapreviousconvictionandsuchconvictioninthecaseinwhichtheclaimisassertedwasnotaguiltypleawithanagreedsentence,andthepreviousconvictionhassubsequentlybeenheldtobeinvalid. `  Inthepresentcase,thepetitionerfiledhispetitionforpostconvictionrelief ;47= outsidethestatuteoflimitationsetforthinT.C.A.4030202(a),andhehasfailedtoshowthatanyofhisclaimsfallwithinoneoftheexceptionssetforthinT.C.A.4030202(b).Inhisresponse,thepetitionercitestoSandsv.State,903S.W.2d297(Tenn. H 1995),fortheargumentthatthestatuteoflimitationshouldnotbestrictlyapplied.InSands,ourSupremeCourtwasaddressingthepreviousPostConvictionAct.Underthe  0 newAct,theexceptionsareexplicitlysetforthaddressedinT.C.A.4030202(bqaa),andaspreviouslystated,thepetitionerhasfailedtoshowthatanhisclaimsfallwithonwithinoneoftheseexceptions. `  ITIS,THEREFORE,ORDEREDthatthestatesmotiontoaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtunderRule20,TennesseeCourtofCriminalAppealsRules,isgranted,andthejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.Itappearingthatthepetitionerisindigent,costsoftheseproceedingsaretaxedtothestate. `     h    D  p _____________________________ `     h    D  p JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGECONCUR:_____________________________ V"! JOHNH.PEAY,JUDGE_____________________________DAVIDH.WELLES,JUDGE