ÿWPCÖT  ÚhYþ²ì1˜¢ú»sZgÈ îúÊ~ê%ýRN© „ò;­mÒFrت‡ý’«ƒàÌí°û¥È‹œŠ,†Y6¹“·JHl,ßí¹œöžf[N\m§Ã+6ÆÍÚ1eRø©ø!cJÞ“1ðiúdî†Ü’¢šŠ\â>px8šúƹ:NÇâPÛVzÖOm6ʤ(<ø¨ú¢ºO«;ö)¶¼Ïa…2\ǼZw 0$ÔŽ±¤û‰tÒ ³Y£ƒq'ZÙ›yq­&w>"CòÁBL§¢·ñ€»ÜÓt ØõMn7Ѥ—–$ðs¢*SÎŽõó„ûwpH÷¶¬Dô*g¨#Úüð°lgcå¢6‚‰(›Ðž°å€NìæË©ÕÅŒåÿ”ä6ù4}ÓÞŸb”aHí²{ßÇ’úI tABL/JÁZîhô­Ú¬\{‡%\Vy…-X\ƒ|J:Ö£»ØBŒ¿=_ˆt×^ìxÒ´’âówF, X$eoi3õøW`F:cXRÕâ»L‡ûŽû€S¾éŠÙ·ð[ô«àƒÆmSW ¸fÅ/¦ÎFýÔá›;« ð«Qβ.ûÈ»™_n8ßÛQ?¨/¾Éòj;ª#ªOÍìüÿv •?U.r % b¦dªè  n­ Á 0(É U:ñ w¸+ 4ã »÷ 0™² 0 DKU:(ÉñU:€Âº|U:Šñijµèh#U:P%Š%U:'ñS'U:D(~((„+ B¬.U:É.³/U:¶3¯ð3¯Ÿ4U:N5§ˆ5d/;U:“=ÂÍ=U:?&É?(ïDU:J%QJU:vO AQ°OÆP 0DÇP 0D Q 0DOQ D/“Q BÂQ(ßQ D3SU::S(tSU:œT<þ6X9`(CourierX ù ZÝ ƒ)Ô$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XäìXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú8Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€exhibits€received€at€these€hearings€that€were€initially€filed€with€thisÐ `  Ðcourt€are€(1)€pages€1€through€31€of€North's€deposition,€(2)€Section€A€of€theÏOctober€25,€1998€òòKnoxville€News€Sentinelóó,€and€(3)€copies€of€Sentinel's€Motion€toÐ , Ì ÐWithdraw€Records€from€the€Archives€of€the€Court€and€Presiding€Judge€GaryÏWade's€Order€allowing€the€withdrawal.€€As€discussed€below,€the€court€laterÏreceived€pages€32€through€45€of€North's€deposition€under€seal. Ý ƒ&„$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€X‰ÑXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý"[T]he€liberty€of€the€press€and€of€speech,€is€within€the€liberty€safeguardedÐ `  Ðby€the€due€process€clause€of€the€Fourteenth€Amendment€from€invasion€by€stateÏaction."€€òòNebraska€Press€Ass'n€v.€Stewartóó,€427€U.S.€539,€557,€96€S.€Ct.€2791,Ð , Ì Ð2801€(1976)€(quoting€òòNear€v.€Minnesota€ex€rel.€Olsonóó,€283€U.S.€697,€707,€51€S.Ð  ² ÐCt.€625,€628€(1931)). ÞÝ ƒ&„$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€X‰ÑXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€Sixth€Amendment€guarantees€defendants€in€federal€criminalÐ `  Ðprosecutions€"trial,€by€an€impartial€jury€.€.€.€."€€The€due€process€clause€of€theÏFourteenth€Amendment€extends€the€right€to€jury€trial€for€non„petty€offenses€toÏstate€criminal€prosecutions.€€òòSeeóó€òòDuncan€v.€Louisianaóó,€391€U.S.€145,€88€S.€Ct.Ð  ² Ð1444€(1968).3|xÖ;«<þ6X9`(CourierXôxþ6X@ɹ`7ûX@($¡¡, øð AZ"Arial Regular„;E…;†;E‡;ˆ;‰;EŠ;‹;DŒ;;EŽ;;U;%e‘;+’;+“;+”;+•;e–;D—;˜;E™;š;D›;ÕÁ; eÂ;Ã;EÄ;Å;Ó€Ñ;P9& ±Ý ƒBä$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€Xù†XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú11Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝIn€òòNew€York€Times€Co.€v.€United€Statesóó,€403€U.S.€713,€91€S.€Ct.€2140Ð `  Ð(1971)€("The€Pentagon€Papers€Cases"),€the€government€sought€a€prior€restraintÏagainst€media€entities€which€had€obtained€sensitive€documents€related€to€theÏViet€Nam€War.€€The€Supreme€Court€had€the€documents€before€it€and€reviewedÏthem€prior€to€making€its€ruling.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€òòNew€York€Timesóó,€403€U.S.€at€722„23,Ð ø ˜ Ðn.3,€91€S.€Ct.€at€2145„46,€n.3€(concurring€opinion€of€Douglas€and€Black,€JJ.)€("IÏhave€gone€over€the€material€listed€in€the€òòin€cameraóó€brief€of€the€United€States.");Ð Äd ÐòòNew€York€Timesóó,€403€U.S.€at€731,€91€S.€Ct.€at€2150€(concurring€opinion€of€WhiteÐ ªJ Ðand€Stewart,€JJ.)€("[A]fter€examining€the€materials€the€Government€characterizesÏas€the€most€sensitive€and€destructive€.€.€.€.").€€Just€as€the€Supreme€Court€wasÏafforded€the€opportunity€to€review€the€documents€over€which€prior€restraint€wasÏsought€in€òòThe€Pentagon€Papers€Casesóó,€we€must€have€the€same€opportunityÐ Bâ  Ðbefore€we€are€able€to€consider€whether€First€Amendment€rights€may€be€curtailedÐ (È  Á Ðin€the€name€of€protecting€a€competing€vital€interest.€€In€the€absence€of€theÏdocuments,€we€are€unable€to€adjudicate€the€issues€presented€in€the€parties'€RuleÏ10€appeals.(I(2&„$¤¤Ý ƒ !ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÔ€X‰ÑXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular Ý ƒ)Ô$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XäìXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝIn€an€affidavit€contained€in€the€appellate€record,€the€Chief€Deputy€Clerk€ofÐ `  Ðthe€Knox€County€Criminal€Court€Clerk's€office€asserts€that€Moncier's€recordsÏhave€always€been€under€lock€and€key€and€"that€Mr.€Moncier's€records€wereÏnever€copied€and€released€by€this€office€to€anyone€except€the€AdministrativeÏOffice€of€the€Courts€in€Nashville."€€The€affiant€concedes€that€for€a€time,€Isaacs'Ïrecords€were€in€the€public€file,€although€they€were€later€placed€under€lock€andÏkey.€€Further,€the€affiant€claims€that€the€records€represented€to€her€to€be€theÏones€from€North's€source€were€reduced€in€size,€which€is€contrary€to€theÏprocedure€for€copying€documents€in€that€office. …Ý ƒ)Ô$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XäìXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝIn€setting€forth€the€facts,€this€court€has€relied€largely€on€the€trial€court'sÐ `  Ðsummary€of€events€as€recited€in€the€transcript€of€the€October€28,€1998€hearing.€ÏAs€pertinent€to€our€factual€summary,€the€trial€court's€recitation€was€undisputed€byÏthe€parties.€,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular ¸Ý ƒ)Ô$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XäìXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú9Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€transcript€of€the€November€4,€1998€hearing€reflects€that€the€trial€courtÐ `  Ðordered€"the€balance€of€it€[the€North€deposition]"€would€be€filed€under€seal.€ÏHowever,€the€written€order€reflects€that€pages€32€through€45€of€the€NorthÏdeposition€are€sealed.€€There€is€no€mention€of€any€exhibits€to€the€deposition. Ý ƒBä$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€Xù†XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý"[T]he€liberty€of€the€press€and€of€speech,€is€within€the€liberty€safeguardedÐ `  Ðby€the€due€process€clause€of€the€Fourteenth€Amendment€from€invasion€by€stateÏaction."€€òòNebraska€Press€Ass'n€v.€Stewartóó,€427€U.S.€539,€557,€96€S.€Ct.€2791,Ð , Ì Ð2801€(1976)€(quoting€òòNear€v.€Minnesota€ex€rel.€Olsonóó,€283€U.S.€697,€707,€51€S.Ð  ² ÐCt.€625,€628€(1931)).,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular çÝ ƒ)Ô$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XäìXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝNorth's€deposition€was€offered€as€an€exhibit€at€the€October€28,€1998€andÐ `  ÐNovember€4,€1998€hearings. ©Ý ƒ)Ô$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XäìXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú6Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝFrankie€Lewis,€Clerk€of€the€Tennessee€Appellate€Courts,€declared€in€anÐ `  Ðaffidavit€that€the€documents€"accidentally"€provided€to€counsel€for€Sentinel€wereÏnot€a€part€of€the€appellate€record.€€Rather,€they€had€been€delivered€to€her€with€aÏSeptember€9,€1997€letter€from€the€trial€judge€identifying€the€records€as€"copies€ofÏthe€motions,€orders€and€fee€petitions€which€have€been€filed€with€[the€trial€court]Ïby€the€attorneys€for€Thomas€Dee€Huskey€and€placed€under€seal€in€the€trialÏcourt."€€The€letter€requested€that€Lewis€provide€the€records€"to€the€AppellateÏJudges€assigned€to€this€appeal€for€their€consideration."€€Lewis€did€not€place€theÏletter€or€documents€in€the€appellate€record;€rather,€she€retained€them€in€a€lockedÏfile€cabinet€in€her€office€until€an€appellate€court€judge€assigned€to€the€panelÏwhich€considered€the€case€requested€them.€€After€the€panel€made€its€decision,Ïthe€documents€and€the€appellate€record€were€returned€to€the€clerk's€officeÏtogether€in€one€box,€and€this€box€was€provided€to€Sentinel's€counsel€when€itÏwithdrew€the€appellate€record. ÞÝ ƒBä$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€Xù†XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€Sixth€Amendment€guarantees€defendants€in€federal€criminalÐ `  Ðprosecutions€"trial,€by€an€impartial€jury€.€.€.€."€€The€due€process€clause€of€theÏFourteenth€Amendment€extends€the€right€to€jury€trial€for€non„petty€offenses€toÏstate€criminal€prosecutions.€€òòSeeóó€òòDuncan€v.€Louisianaóó,€391€U.S.€145,€88€S.€Ct.Ð  ² Ð1444€(1968).,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular …Ý ƒBä$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€Xù†XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝIn€setting€forth€the€facts,€this€court€has€relied€largely€on€the€trial€court'sÐ `  Ðsummary€of€events€as€recited€in€the€transcript€of€the€October€28,€1998€hearing.€ÏAs€pertinent€to€our€factual€summary,€the€trial€court's€recitation€was€undisputed€byÏthe€parties.€,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular çÝ ƒBä$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€Xù†XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝNorth's€deposition€was€offered€as€an€exhibit€at€the€October€28,€1998€andÐ `  ÐNovember€4,€1998€hearings.,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular üÝ ƒ)Ô$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XäìXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú10Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝIn€North's€deposition,€the€documents€from€the€undisclosed€source€areÐ `  Ðdesignated€as€an€exhibit€to€the€deponent's€testimony,€but€counsel€for€HuskeyÏproposed,€"[L]et's€all€agree€that€we€are€going€to€keep€the€exhibits€in€our€privateÏpossession.€€I€don't€mean€to€make€.€.€.€them€part€of€the€public€record€any€moreÏthan€they€have€already€been€made."€€Counsel€for€Sentinel€agreed.€€While€weÏunderstand€Huskey's€counsel's€concern€for€keeping€the€records€private,€we€doÏnot€understand€why€there€was€no€request€that€the€deposition€exhibit€be€receivedÏby€the€trial€court€under€seal€along€with€pages€32€through€45€of€the€depositionÏtranscript. Ý ƒBä$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€#Xù†XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝIn€an€affidavit€contained€in€the€appellate€record,€the€Chief€Deputy€Clerk€ofÐ `  Ðthe€Knox€County€Criminal€Court€Clerk's€office€asserts€that€Moncier's€recordsÏhave€always€been€under€lock€and€key€and€"that€Mr.€Moncier's€records€wereÏnever€copied€and€released€by€this€office€to€anyone€except€the€AdministrativeÏOffice€of€the€Courts€in€Nashville."€€The€affiant€concedes€that€for€a€time,€Isaacs'Ïrecords€were€in€the€public€file,€although€they€were€later€placed€under€lock€andÏkey.€€Further,€the€affiant€claims€that€the€records€represented€to€her€to€be€theÏones€from€North's€source€were€reduced€in€size,€which€is€contrary€to€theÏprocedure€for€copying€documents€in€that€office. d,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular ©Ý ƒBä$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€%Xù†XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú6Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝFrankie€Lewis,€Clerk€of€the€Tennessee€Appellate€Courts,€declared€in€anÐ `  Ðaffidavit€that€the€documents€"accidentally"€provided€to€counsel€for€Sentinel€wereÏnot€a€part€of€the€appellate€record.€€Rather,€they€had€been€delivered€to€her€with€aÏSeptember€9,€1997€letter€from€the€trial€judge€identifying€the€records€as€"copies€ofÏthe€motions,€orders€and€fee€petitions€which€have€been€filed€with€[the€trial€court]Ïby€the€attorneys€for€Thomas€Dee€Huskey€and€placed€under€seal€in€the€trialÏcourt."€€The€letter€requested€that€Lewis€provide€the€records€"to€the€AppellateÏJudges€assigned€to€this€appeal€for€their€consideration."€€Lewis€did€not€place€theÏletter€or€documents€in€the€appellate€record;€rather,€she€retained€them€in€a€lockedÏfile€cabinet€in€her€office€until€an€appellate€court€judge€assigned€to€the€panelÏwhich€considered€the€case€requested€them.€€After€the€panel€made€its€decision,Ïthe€documents€and€the€appellate€record€were€returned€to€the€clerk's€officeÏtogether€in€one€box,€and€this€box€was€provided€to€Sentinel's€counsel€when€itÏwithdrew€the€appellate€record.,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular ¥Ý ƒ)Ô$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XäìXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú7Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThese€filings€include€the€affidavit€of€Frankie€Lewis. ¥Ý ƒBä$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€(Xù†XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú7Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThese€filings€include€the€affidavit€of€Frankie€Lewis.,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular Ý ƒ)Ô$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XäìXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú12Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝIn€òòNew€York€Times€Co.€v.€United€Statesóó,€403€U.S.€713,€91€S.€Ct.€2140Ð `  Ð(1971)€("The€Pentagon€Papers€Cases"),€the€government€sought€a€prior€restraintÏagainst€media€entities€which€had€obtained€sensitive€documents€related€to€theÏViet€Nam€War.€€The€Supreme€Court€had€the€documents€before€it€and€reviewedÏthem€prior€to€making€its€ruling.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€òòNew€York€Timesóó,€403€U.S.€at€722„23,Ð ø ˜ Ðn.3,€91€S.€Ct.€at€2145„46,€n.3€(concurring€opinion€of€Douglas€and€Black,€JJ.)€("IÏhave€gone€over€the€material€listed€in€the€òòin€cameraóó€brief€of€the€United€States.");Ð Äd ÐòòNew€York€Timesóó,€403€U.S.€at€731,€91€S.€Ct.€at€2150€(concurring€opinion€of€WhiteÐ ªJ Ðand€Stewart,€JJ.)€("[A]fter€examining€the€materials€the€Government€characterizesÏas€the€most€sensitive€and€destructive€.€.€.€.").€€Just€as€the€Supreme€Court€wasÏafforded€the€opportunity€to€review€the€documents€over€which€prior€restraint€wasÏsought€in€òòThe€Pentagon€Papers€Casesóó,€we€must€have€the€same€opportunityÐ Bâ  Á Ðbefore€we€are€able€to€consider€whether€First€Amendment€rights€may€be€curtailedÏin€the€name€of€protecting€a€competing€vital€interest.€€In€the€absence€of€theÏdocuments,€we€are€unable€to€adjudicate€the€issues€presented€in€the€parties'€RuleÏ10€appeals. ZÝ ƒBä$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€+Xù†XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú8Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€exhibits€received€at€these€hearings€that€were€initially€filed€with€thisÐ `  Ðcourt€are€(1)€pages€1€through€31€of€North's€deposition,€(2)€Section€A€of€theÏOctober€25,€1998€òòKnoxville€News€Sentinelóó,€and€(3)€copies€of€Sentinel's€Motion€toÐ , Ì ÐWithdraw€Records€from€the€Archives€of€the€Court€and€Presiding€Judge€GaryÏWade's€Order€allowing€the€withdrawal.€€As€discussed€below,€the€court€laterÏreceived€pages€32€through€45€of€North's€deposition€under€seal.,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular ¸Ý ƒBä$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€-Xù†XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú9Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€transcript€of€the€November€4,€1998€hearing€reflects€that€the€trial€courtÐ `  Ðordered€"the€balance€of€it€[the€North€deposition]"€would€be€filed€under€seal.€ÏHowever,€the€written€order€reflects€that€pages€32€through€45€of€the€NorthÏdeposition€are€sealed.€€There€is€no€mention€of€any€exhibits€to€the€deposition.,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular Ý ƒ)Ô$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€XäìXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú11Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝIndeed€without€one€of€the€parties€filing€the€detailed€time€sheets€in€theÐ `  Ðtrial€court€as€an€exhibit€to€Northððs€deposition,€there€appears€little€else€we€can€doÏto€create€a€record€complete€enough€to€allow€our€consideration€of€this€appeal€onÏthe€merits.€€This€Court€cannot,€pursuant€to€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(e),€orderÏsupplementation€of€the€appellate€record€with€material€that€is€not€otherwiseÏproperly€includable€in€the€record.ÌÌà ` àNeither€party€filed€the€detailed€time€sheets€in€this€appeal€of€the€corollaryÏproceeding€to€the€criminal€prosecution.€€In€addition€the€time€sheets€do€notÏappear€to€be€part€of€the€record€in€the€criminal€prosecution€itself.€€Once€theseÏdocuments€are€sent€to€the€Administrative€Office€of€the€Courts€the€trial€court€clerkÏhas€no€control€over€them.€(See€Affidavit€of€Chief€Deputy€Clerk€of€the€Knox€Co.ÏCriminal€Court).€€These€detailed€time€sheets€are€confidential€administrativeÏrecords€of€the€court€systemððs€indigent€defense€payment€system€rather€thanÐ ®   Ðsubstantative€records€in€the€criminal€case.€€Indeed,€in€òòHuskeyóó€the€trial€judge€hadÐ `  Ðto€request€return€of€detailed€time€sheets€from€A.O.C. Ý ƒ!$$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€0X¤¶XXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú11Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝIndeed€without€one€of€the€parties€filing€the€detailed€time€sheets€in€theÐ `  Ðtrial€court€as€an€exhibit€to€Northððs€deposition€there€appears€little€else€we€can€doÏto€create€a€record€complete€enough€to€allow€our€consideration€of€this€appeal€onÏthe€merits.€€This€Court€cannot,€pursuant€to€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(e),€orderÏsupplementation€of€the€appellate€record€with€material€that€is€not€otherwiseÏproperly€includable€in€the€record.ÌÌà ` àNeither€party€filed€the€detailed€time€sheets€inthe€corrollary€proceeding€toÏthe€criminal€prosecution€which€this€appeal€represents.€€In€addition€the€timeÏsheets€do€not€appear€to€be€part€of€the€record€in€the€criminal€prosecution€itself.€ÏOnce€these€documens€are€sent€to€the€Administrative€Office€of€the€Courts€the€trialÏcourt€clerk€has€has€no€control€over€them.€(See€Affidavit€of€Chief€Deputy€Clerk€ofÏthe€Knox€Co.€Criminal€Court).€€These€detailed€time€sheets€are€confidentialÏadministrative€records€of€the€court€systemððs€indigent€defense€payment€systemÐ ®   Ðrather€than€records€in€the€criminal€case.€€Indeed,€in€òòHuskeyóó€the€trial€judge€had€toÐ `  Ðrequest€return€of€detailed€time€sheets€from€A.O.C.,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular Ý ƒ)Ô$ÝÒ°ÒÔ€2XäìXXXÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú11Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝIndeed€without€one€of€the€parties€filing€the€detailed€time€sheets€in€theÐ `  Ðtrial€court€as€an€exhibit€to€Northððs€deposition€there€appears€little€else€we€can€doÏto€create€a€record€complete€enough€to€allow€our€consideration€of€this€appeal€onÏthe€merits.€€This€Court€cannot,€pursuant€to€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(e),€orderÏsupplementation€of€the€appellate€record€with€material€that€is€not€otherwiseÏproperly€includable€in€the€record.ÌÌà ` àNeither€party€filed€the€detailed€time€sheets€in€the€corollary€proceeding€toÏthe€criminal€prosecution€which€this€appeal€represents.€€In€addition€the€timeÏsheets€do€not€appear€to€be€part€of€the€record€in€the€criminal€prosecution€itself.€ÏOnce€these€documents€are€sent€to€the€Administrative€Office€of€the€Courts€theÏtrial€court€clerk€has€no€control€over€them.€(See€Affidavit€of€Chief€Deputy€Clerk€ofÏthe€Knox€Co.€Criminal€Court).€€These€detailed€time€sheets€are€confidentialÏadministrative€records€of€the€court€systemððs€indigent€defense€payment€systemÐ ®  Á Ðrather€than€records€in€the€criminal€case.€€Indeed,€in€òòHuskeyóó€the€trial€judge€had€toÐ `  Ðrequest€return€of€detailed€time€sheets€from€A.O.C.,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular45678Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ !ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ !ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó99'÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd Ý ƒ5¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€<X‰ÑXXXÔÔ€<”jX<X‰ÑÔÓ  ÓÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€<X‰ÑX<”jÔÐ  ÐÌò òFebruary€1,€1999Ð šš ÐÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€<ô›— ôX<X‰ÑÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó""""'ÿÿdxd,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular Ý ƒ5¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€>X‰ÑXXXÔÔ€>”jX>X‰ÑÔÓ  ÓÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€>X‰ÑX>”jÔÐ  ÐÌò òJanuary€29,€1999Ð šš ÐÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€>ô›— ôX>X‰ÑÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial RegularÝ ƒ !ÝÝ  ÝñÁ;ñ›ñÁ;ññÁ;ññ•;ñ›ñ•;ññÁ;ññ•;ññ;ñ›ñ;ññ•;ññ;ñ›ñ;ñÑ` °ÑÒ°ÒÓ  ÓÔ€ XòUXXXÔÑ7€ òU XXdðdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ€Ñò òñÑ;ñœßr€3=;<,(j 8` `€€@EÈf ` ttx$` ð ÚrßñÑ;ñ›ñÑ;ñßr€3:;<,(j 8` `€€@EÈf ` ttx$` ð ÚrßñÅ;ñœñÅ;ññÑ;ññÅ;ññÅ;ñà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÌÌ€à@::'àAT€KNOXVILLEˆÐ @ à ÐÌà@88àSPECIAL€DECEMBER€1998€SESSIONó óˆÐ  À ÐÌò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,€à À àà  àó ó)Ð   Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àÐ ð Ðvs.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àCCA€No.€03C01„9811„CR„00410Ð à€ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àÐ Ðp  Ðò òTHOMAS€DEE€HUSKEY,ó óà h àà À àà  à)à p àKnox€CountyÐ À`  Ðà ` àAppellee/Cross€Appellant,ò òà À àà  àó ó)à p àò òÐ °P  Ðó óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àHon.€Richard€Baumgartner,€JudgeÐ  @  Ðvs.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àÐ 0  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p à(Prior€Restraint€of€Media)Ð €  Ðò òTHE€KNOXVILLE€NEWS„SENTINEL,ó óà  à)Ð p Ðà ` àAppellant/Cross€Appellee.à À àà  à)Ð ` ÐÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à h àà À àà  àà p àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:Ð @à Ðò òRICHARD€L.€HOLLOWà h àà À àà  àà p àHERBERT€S.€MONCIERÐ 0Ð ÐNATHAN€D.€ROWELLà h àà À àà  àà p àó óAttorney€at€Lawò òÐ  À Ðó óAttorneys€at€Lawà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àSuite€775€NationsBank€CenterÐ ° ÐP.O.€Box€131à  àà h àà À àà  àà p à550€Main€Ave.Ð   ÐKnoxville,€TN€€37901„0131à À àà  àà p àKnoxville,€TN€€37902Ð ð ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òGREGORY€P.€ISAACSÐ Ð p Ðó óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAttorney€at€LawÐ À!` Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àOne€Centre€SquareÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à620€Market€St.,€Ste.€280Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àKnoxville,€TN€€37902ÌFOR€AMICUS€CURIAE:ò òà h àà À àà  àà p àó óÐ €%  ÐòòThe€Tennessean,€The€TennesseeÐ p& ÐPress€Association,€The€Society€ofÌProfessional€Journalists€and€ÌThe€Middle€Tennessee€Chapter€ofÌThe€Society€for€Professional€ÌJournalistsóóÐ  +À!$ Ðò òALFRED€H.€KNIGHTÐ ,°"% Ðó óAttorney€at€LawÐ - #& Ð215€Second€Ave.,€NorthÌNashville,€TN€€37201ÌÌòòMemphis€Publishing€CompanyóóÐ À0`'* Ðò òLUCIAN€T.€PERAó óÐ °1P(+ Ðò òKATHY€LAUGHTER€LAIZUREó óÐ  2@), Ðò òKIMBERLY€D.€BROWNó óÐ 30*- ÐAttorneys€at€LawÌ80€Monroe€Ave.,€Ste.€700ÌMemphis,€TN€€38103„2467ÌÌò òOPINION€FILED:________________Ð @8à.2 ÐÌñ;ñœñ;ñAPPEALS€DISMISSEDñ;ñ›ñ;ñÌÌJAMES€CURWOOD€WITT,€JR.,€JUDGEó óÐ < 26t Ðà@qq*àò òòòOPINIONó óóóÓӈР`  Ðà ` àà ¸ àIn€this€novel€case,€we€are€called€upon€to€consider€the€competingÏinterests€of€a€media€entity's€rights€under€the€First€Amendment€of€the€United€StatesÏConstitutionñ‘;ñ׃×ñ‘;ññ‘;ñ׃×ñ‘;ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€and€article€I,€section€19€of€the€Tennessee€Constitution€against€aÐ   Ðcriminal€defendant's€due€process€rights€to€a€fair€trial€under€the€Sixth€Amendment€ofÏthe€federal€constitutionñ‘;ñ׃×ñ‘;ññ‘;ñ׃×ñ‘;ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€and€article€I,€section€9€of€the€state€constitution.€€This€caseÐ À`  Ðcomes€to€us€from€the€Knox€County€Criminal€Court,€which€issued€an€order€restrainingÏThe€Knoxville€News„Sentinel€("Sentinel")€from€publishing€detailed€records€of€court„¼appointed€defense€counsel's€fees,€experts€and€other€expenses€while€the€case€ofÏòòState€v.€Thomas€Dee€Huskeyóó,€a€four„count€capital€prosecution,€œñÃ;ñwañÃ;ññÄ;ñiñÄ;ñs›€pending.€€WeÐ @à Ðgranted€Sentinel's€application€for€permission€to€appeal€and€Huskey's€application€forÏcross€appeal€pursuant€to€Rule€10,€Tennessee€Rules€of€Appellate€Procedure.€€TheÏprimary€issue€is€whether€the€lower€court's€injunction€is€impermissible€under€the€stateÏand€federal€constitutions.€€ñ;ñœñ;ñIn€a€cross„appeal,€Huskeyñ;ñ›ñ;ñ€has€raised€several€non„¼constitutional€issues€regarding€the€propriety€of€the€ñ;ñœñ;ñinjunction.ñ;ñ›ñ;ñ€€Having€heard€andÏconsidered€the€oral€arguments€of€counsel€for€Sentinel€and€ñ;ñœñ;ñHuskey€and€havingÏreviewed€the€record€which€was€filed€on€the€day€of€argument,€as€supplemented,€weÏdismiss€as€improvidently€granted€the€Rule€10€appeals€of€both€parties.ñ;ñ›ñ;ñÌñ;ñœñ;ñÌÐ  - #& Ðñ;ñ›ñ;ñà@77àò òI.€€Facts€and€Procedural€Historyó óˆÐ `  Ðà ` àà ¸ àWe€begin€with€a€recitation€of€the€facts€pertinent€to€this€appeal.ñ‘;ñ׃×ñ‘;ññ‘;ñ׃×ñ‘;ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð 8 Ø ÐThomas€Dee€Huskey€stands€accused€of€four€counts€of€capital€murder.€€At€theÏpresent€time,€he€is€on€trial€in€the€Knox€County€Criminal€Court€for€his€alleged€crimes.€Ï€The€legal€proceedings€leading€up€to€the€trial€have€spanned€several€years€and€haveÏreceived€considerable€media€attention.€€ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àHuskey€is€indigent.€€Throughout€these€proceedings,€he€has€beenÏrepresented€by€two€court„appointed€attorneys,€Herbert€Moncier€and€Gregory€Isaacs.€ÏMoncier€and€Isaacs€have€submitted€documentation€to€the€trial€court€and€theÏAdministrative€Office€of€the€Courts€("AOC")€seeking€payment€from€the€state€for€theirÏservices€and€the€services€of€experts.€€In€earlier€litigation,€Sentinel€sought€to€discoverÏthe€amount€of€public€funds€expended€for€the€defense€of€Huskey€as€reflected€inÏcounsel's€detailed€time€records,€which€were€ordered€held€under€seal.€€The€trial€courtÏand€this€court€allowed€Sentinel€access€to€summaries€of€defense€counsel's€timeÏrecords€but€denied€it€access€to€the€detailed€records.€€òòKnoxville€News€Sentinel€v.Ð `$ ÐThomas€Dee€Huskeyóó,€No.€03C01„9708„CR„00331€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,Ð ,&Ì  ÐFeb.€24,€1998),€òòperm.€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1998)€("Huskey€I").€€Ð ø'˜" ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àDespite€the€outcome€of€the€earlier€proceeding,€Sentinel€obtained€fromÏan€undisclosed€source€copies€of€detailed€time€sheets€of€Attorneys€Moncier€andÏIsaacs€for€the€years€1992€through€1995.€€John€North,€a€reporter€for€Sentinel,Ïâ âclaimed€in€deposition€testimony€that€he€received€these€records€in€approximatelyÐ ô0”', ÐMay€1998.ñ’;ñ׃×ñ’;ññ’;ñ׃×ñ’;ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€He€understood€the€origin€of€the€records€to€be€the€Knox€County€CriminalÐ `  Ðâ âCourt€Clerk's€office.ñ’;ñ׃\×ñ’;ññ’;ñ׃!\×ñ’;ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð , Ì ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àOn€October€1,€1998,€counsel€for€Sentinel€withdrew€the€record€of€theÏprevious€appeal€from€the€archives€of€this€court.€€Later€that€same€day,€according€toÏthe€North€deposition,€Sentinel's€attorneys€and€North€discovered€that€the€documentsÏprovided€by€the€clerk€of€the€appellate€courts€included€detailed€time€records€ofÏdefense€counsel€and€other€information€pertaining€to€authorizations€for€expertÏservices€which€were€more€extensive€than€the€information€which€North€had€alreadyÏreceived€from€his€undisclosed€source.€€North€believed€this€information€wasÏ"accidentally"€provided,€and€the€documents€were€returned€to€the€court.ñ’;ñ׃: ×ñ’;ññ’;ñ׃$: ×ñ’;ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú6Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð Xø ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àOn€Thursday,€October€22,€1998,€North€notified€Moncier€that€he€hadÏthe€detailed€time€sheets€from€the€undisclosed€source.€€North€advised€Moncier€thatÐ ¼ \ ÐSentinel€intended€to€publish€an€article€about€the€information€on€October€25,€1998Ïand€inquired€whether€Moncier€would€comment.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àMoncier€and€Isaacs€filed€an€application€for€temporary€restraining€orderÏand€injunction€against€Sentinel€on€Friday,€October€23,€1998.€€They€soughtÏprohibition€of€publication€of€any€information€in€the€detailed€time€records€and€returnÏof€all€copies€of€the€time€records€in€Sentinel's€possession.€€The€trial€court€entered€aÏtemporary€restraining€order€prohibiting€publication€of€information€contained€in€theÏrecords.€€Based€upon€the€belief€the€order€was€invalid€on€its€face,€Sentinel€defied€theÏtrial€court's€order€on€Sunday,€October€25,€1998€by€publishing€an€article€whichÏutilized€some€of€the€information€from€the€records.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àOn€October€26,€1998,€Sentinel€moved€to€dissolve€the€temporaryÏrestraining€order€and€to€dismiss€all€ñ;ñœñ;ñproceedings€challengingñ;ñ›ñ;ñ€publication€of€theÏinformation€obtained€by€Sentinel.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àThereafter,€on€October€28,€1998€and€November€4,€1998,€the€trial€courtÏconducted€hearings€on€Sentinel's€motion€to€dissolve€the€temporary€restraining€orderÏand€on€Huskey's€motion€to€convert€the€temporary€restraining€order€to€a€temporaryÏinjunction.€€After€receiving€evidence€and€hearing€the€arguments€of€counsel€forÏSentinel€and€Huskey,€the€trial€court€entered€an€order€on€November€4,€1998Ïenjoining€Sentinel€"from€the€publication€or€dissemination€in€any€manner€of€anyÏinformation€contained€in€the€detailed€time€records€and/or€from€any€other€sealedÏdocuments€which€it€gained€access€to€through€the€review€of€the€appellate€courtÏrecord."€€The€order€further€required€Sentinel€to€turn€over€all€copies€of€"the€sealedÏrecords"€in€its€possession€to€Attorney€Hollow€for€confidential€safekeeping€"until€theÏconclusion€of€this€case."€€ÌÐ ä9„06 Ðà ` àà ¸ àAfter€we€granted€Sentinel's€application€for€extraordinary€appeal€onÏDecember€16,€1998,€we€received€an€application€from€Huskey€which€challenged€theÏinjunction€in€four€respects.€€The€issues€raised€in€Huskey's€application€are€(1)Ïwhether€the€detailed€time€records€are€protected€by€attorney/client€privilege,€the€workÏproduct€doctrine,€Rules€of€the€Tennessee€Supreme€Court,€or€the€Tennessee€RulesÏof€Criminal€Procedure,€(2)€whether€the€trial€court€had€original€jurisdiction€to€hearÏevidence€and€make€rulings€with€respect€to€the€appellate€court€clerk's€release€of€theÏdetailed€time€records,€(3)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€Huskey's€requestÏfor€an€injunction€requiring€Sentinel€to€return€the€detailed€time€records€to€Huskey'sÏattorneys,€and€(4)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€designating€Hollow€as€custodianÏof€the€detailed€time€records€in€Sentinel's€possession.€€Because€these€issues€wereÏclosely€intertwined€with€Sentinel's€appellate€issue,€we€granted€Huskey's€application.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àThis€case€presented€a€very€unique€situation€in€that€the€normal€timeÏframe€for€consideration€of€Sentinel's€appeal€would€result€in€it€losing€a€right€it€wouldÏnot€be€able€to€recover€in€the€event€Sentinel's€appeal€was€meritorious.€€Accordingly,Ïwe€departed€from€the€usual€practice€of€receiving€briefs€and€heard€oral€argumentsÏon€December€31,€1998.€ÌÌà@66#àò òII.€€Record€on€Appealó óˆÐ „+$"& Ðà ` àà ¸ àDue€to€the€expedited€nature€of€this€appeal,€assembly€of€the€record€onÏappeal€has€been€somewhat€anomalous.€€The€record€before€this€court€includes:ÌÓÓà8 ` à(1)à0¸ ` Ð ` Ð àpleadings€filed€and€order€of€the€trial€court€relative€to€Sentinel'sÐ ô0”', Ð1997€attempt€to€obtain€access€to€sealed€documents,Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðà ` à(2)à8 ¸ àpleadings€filed€and€orders€dated€October€23,€1998€throughÐ À2`). ÐNovember€4,€1998,ñ“;ñ׃&×ñ“;ññ“;ñ׃'×ñ“;ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú7Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ц3F*/¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðâ âà ` à(3)à8 ¸ àtranscripts€and€exhibits€from€the€hearings€on€the€temporaryÐ Œ4,+0 Ðinjunction€from€October€28,€1998€and€November€4,€1998,ñ“;ñ׃×ñ“;ññ“;ñ׃*v×ñ“;ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú8Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð` ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðâ âà8 ` à(4)à0¸ ` Ð ` Ð àpleadings€filed€in€the€trial€court€after€the€temporary€injunctionÐ F æ Ðwas€entered€on€November€4,€1998,Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðà ` à(5)à8 ¸ àtranscripts€of€the€hearings€on€a€motion€to€dismiss€onÐ  ² ÐDecember€1,€1998€and€December€3,€1998,Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðà ` à(6)à8 ¸ àmotions,€affidavits,€order,€and€other€pleadings€filed€in€1996Ð Þ ~ Ðrelative€to€entomological€evidence€and€discovery,Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðà ` à(7)à0 ¸ àsentencing€memoranda€filed€in€1995€and€1996,€andЪJ¸ (#¸ (# Ðà ` à(8)à8 ¸ àmotions€filed€in€1996€relative€to€the€disclosure€of€informationÐ 0 Ðabout€the€defendant's€mental€health€records€and€statementÏduring€mental€health€evaluation.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌÌÓÓà ` àà ¸ àObviously,€our€review€of€the€record€is€guided€by€our€determination€of€Ïwhich€portions€of€the€record€are€relevant€to€the€issues€presented.€€Because€theÏheart€of€this€case€is€the€propriety€of€the€temporary€injunction,€the€pleadings€andÏorders€filed€from€October€23,€1998€through€November€4,€1998,€as€well€as€theÏtranscripts€and€exhibits€from€the€hearings€on€October€28,€1998€and€November€4,Ï1998€are€of€paramount€importance.€€The€earlier€filings€and€orders€of€the€trial€courtÏare€relevant€to€establish€the€background€leading€up€to€the€present€appeal.€€At€theÏOctober€28,€1998€hearing,€the€trial€court€took€judicial€notice€of€the€prior€proceedingsÏin€the€case;€however,€our€knowledge€of€prior€proceedings€is€limited€to€the€filingsÏactually€preserved€in€the€appellate€record.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àOn€the€other€hand,€we€deem€anything€filed€òòafteróó€the€trial€court€enteredÐ Ò(r# Ðthe€temporary€injunction€on€November€4,€1998€not€relevant€to€this€appeal.€€òòSeeóóÐ ž*>!% ÐòòNebraska€Press€Ass'n€v.€Stewartóó,€427€U.S.€539,€562,€96€S.€Ct.€2791,€2804€(1976)Ð j, #' Ð(appellate€court€must€"examine€the€evidence€before€the€trial€judge€when€the€orderÏwas€entered"€to€determine€propriety€of€prior€restraint).€€Accordingly,€we€have€notÏconsidered€the€parties'€filings€after€entry€of€the€order€on€November€4,€1998€and€theÐ Î1n(- Ðtranscripts€of€the€December€1€and€3,€1998€hearings.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àNotably,€the€record€on€appeal,€which€has€been€designated€by€theÏparties€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Rule€of€Appellate€Procedure€24(a),€does€not€includeÏthe€detailed€time€sheets€which€Sentinel€obtained€from€North's€source€and€whichÏwere€the€basis€for€the€October€25,€1998€article€it€published.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àFollowing€oral€argument,€the€court€determined€that€the€deposition€ofÏJohn€North€had€been€filed€as€an€evidentiary€exhibit€to€the€October€28,€1998€andÏNovember€4,€1998€hearings.€€The€deposition€was€filed€in€two€parts€„„€pages€1Ïthrough€31€were€filed€as€exhibit€1,€and€the€remainder€of€the€deposition€was€filed€asÏexhibit€5.€€Exhibit€5€was€placed€under€seal€by€the€trial€court.€€Moreover,€exhibit€5Ïwas€not€transmitted€by€the€trial€court€clerk€with€the€appellate€record.€€On€review€ofÏthe€first€31€pages€of€the€North€deposition,€it€was€apparent€that€the€detailed€timeÏrecords€North€received€from€the€source€were€made€an€exhibit€to€the€deposition.€€WeÏdetermined€that€the€remainder€of€the€deposition€and€the€documentary€exhibit€to€theÏdeposition€were€necessary€in€order€to€"convey€a€fair,€accurate€and€completeÏaccount€of€what€transpired"€in€the€trial€court.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(a).€€As€such,Ð ì'Œ" Ðwe€entered€an€order€compelling€the€trial€court€clerk€to€transmit€exhibit€5€to€theÏappellate€court€clerk.€€The€trial€court€clerk€promptly€complied€by€providing€us€withÏexhibit€5€and€the€trial€court's€order€sealing€that€exhibit.€€Upon€review€of€exhibit€5,€weÏdiscovered€that€the€detailed€time€records,€although€an€exhibit€to€the€NorthÏdeposition,€were€not€contained€therein.€€On€review€of€the€trial€court's€order€sealingÏexhibit€5,€it€became€apparent€that€the€trial€court€had€not€received€the€detailed€timeÏrecords€as€part€of€the€filed€deposition€as€we€originally€inferred€from€the€record.ñ”;ñ׃×ñ”;ññ”;ñ׃,×ñ”;ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú9Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€òòSeeóóÐ €4 +0 ÐTenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(a)€(unless€designated€by€a€party,€depositions€and€otherÏdiscovery€materials€are€not€included€in€record€on€appeal).€€ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àWe€declined€to€order€any€further€supplementation.€€Although€the€trialÏcourt€has€recited€that€it€is€familiar€with€Huskey's€lawyers'€time€sheets€and€althoughÏthe€record€in€the€trial€court€may€contain€some,€if€not€all,€of€such€time€sheets,€theÏtime€sheets€at€ñÁ;ñœñÁ;ñissueñš;ñsñš;ññÁ;ñ›ñÁ;ñ€in€this€case€are€the€time€sheets€North€received€in€May€1998.€ÏNorth's€deposition€reflects€that€both€parties€had€copies€of€the€time€sheets,€whichÏthey€agreed€to€keep€in€their€possession€rather€than€surrendering€them€to€the€courtÏreporter€to€be€maintained€with€the€deposition€transcript,€despite€Huskey's€counselÏidentifying€them€at€the€deposition€as€"exhibit€number€1"€to€the€deposition.׃ ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú10Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€In€lightÐ Xø Ðof€the€parties'€deliberate€abridgement€of€the€record€and€this€court's€unfulfilledÏattempt€to€supplement€the€record,€we€declined€to€initiate€further€steps€to€constructÏa€record€that€we€would€consider€to€be€"fair,€accurate€and€complete."€€Tenn.€R.€App.ÏP.€24(a).ñÁ;ññ›;ñœñ›;ññÁ;ññ›;ññÁ;ññÂ;ñœ×ƒ.¦ ×ñÂ;ññÂ;ñ׃1¦ ×ñÂ;ññÁ;ññÁ;ñ׃/¦ ×ñÁ;ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú11Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×›ñ›;ññÁ;ññ›;ñ›ñ›;ññÁ;ñÐ ˆ"( Їà@¸¸#àò òIII.€€Prior€Restraintó óˆÐ `  Ðà ` àà ¸ àThis€case€involves€two€of€the€rights€our€state€and€federal€constitutionalÏframers€held€in€highest€regard€„„€freedom€of€the€press€and€the€right€of€an€accusedÏto€a€fair€trial.€€On€the€one€hand,€freedom€of€the€press€is€guaranteed€by€the€FirstÏAmendment€to€the€United€States€Constitution€and€article€I,€section€19€of€theÏTennessee€Constitution.€€On€the€other€hand,€a€criminal€defendant's€right€to€a€fairÏtrial€is€guaranteed€by€the€federal€Sixth€Amendment€and€article€I,€section€9€of€ourÏstate€constitution.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àThe€framers€of€the€federal€and€state€constitutions€did€not€establish€aÏhierarchy€for€the€enforcement€of€the€rights€of€the€press€and€rights€of€the€criminalÏdefendant€in€the€case€of€competing€interests.€€When€the€United€States€SupremeÏCourt€has€been€presented€with€the€opportunity€to€consider€these€two€rights€inÏcompetition€with€one€another,€it€has€specifically€declined€to€impose€a€òòper€seóó€rule€ofÐ È h Ðpriority.€òòSeeóó€òòNebraska€Pressóó,€427€U.S.€at€561,€96€S.€Ct.€at€2804.€Ð ”"4 ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àThat€said,€the€United€States€Supreme€Court€has€recognized€that€theÏFirst€Amendment€freedom€is€fundamental€to€our€society.€€òòNew€York€Times€v.Ð ø'˜" ÐSullivanóó,€376€U.S.€254,€269,€84€S.€Ct.€710,€720€(1964).ò ò€ó ó€Moreover,€the€court€hasÐ Ä)d $ Ðrecognized€the€main€purpose€of€the€First€Amendment€to€be€prevention€of€priorÏrestraints€on€publications.€€òòPatterson€v.€Colorado€ex€rel.€Att'y€Generalóó,€205€U.S.€454,Ð h-$( Ð462,€27€S.€Ct.€556,€558€(1907)€(citation€omitted).€€The€court€has€characterized€so„¼called€"prior€restraints"€as€"the€most€serious€and€the€least€tolerable€infringement€onÏFirst€Amendment€Rights."€€òòNebraska€Pressóó,€427€U.S.€at€559,€96€S.€Ct.€at€2803.€€TheÐ Ì2l). ÐTennessee€Supreme€Court€has€said€that€article€I,€section€19€of€the€state€constitutionÏaffords€protection€which€is€"at€least€as€broad"€as€the€First€Amendment.€€òòLeech€v.Ð d6-2 ÐAmerican€Booksellersóó,€582€S.W.2d€738€(Tenn.€1979).€€Ð `  ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àThe€other€side€of€the€coin€is€that€the€United€States€Supreme€Court€hasÏopined€that€the€right€of€a€defendant€to€a€fair€trial€is€"the€most€fundamental€of€allÏfreedoms€„„€[which]€must€be€maintained€at€all€costs."€€òòEstes€v.€Texasóó,€381€U.S.€532,Ð 0 Ð540€85€S.€Ct.€1628,€1632€(1965);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòPress„Enterprise€Co.€v.€Superior€Courtóó,Ð \ü  Ð464€U.S.€501,€508,€104€S.€Ct.€819,€823€(1984)€("No€right€ranks€higher€than€the€rightÏof€an€accused€to€a€fair€trial.");€òòShepherd€v.€Floridaóó,€341€U.S.€50,€53,€71€S.€Ct.€549,Ð ô”  Ð550€(1951)€(concurring€opinion€of€Jackson€and€Frankfurter,€JJ.)€("Newspapers,€inÏthe€enjoyment€of€their€constitutional€rights,€may€not€deprive€accused€persons€ofÏtheir€right€to€fair€trial.").€€Further,€in€the€context€of€a€capital€prosecution,€the€highÏcourt€has€said€that€a€defendant€facing€the€prospect€of€the€ultimate€penalty€of€deathÏis€entitled€to€heightened€due€process€protection.€ò ò€ó óòòWoodson€v.€North€Carolinaóó,€428Ð ð ÐU.S.€280,€305,€96€S.€Ct.€2978,€2991€(1976).€€In€the€present€case,€Huskey€arguesÏthat€the€detailed€time€sheets€contain€defense€secrets€which€otherwise€would€not€beÏdiscoverable€under€Tennessee€Rule€of€Criminal€Procedure€16(b).ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àThe€United€States€Supreme€Court€has€said€that€where€the€SixthÏAmendment€rights€of€an€individual€accused€of€a€crime€are€in€conflict€with€the€FirstÏAmendment€rights€of€a€media€entity,€the€court€must€consider€"(a)€the€nature€andÏextent€of€pretrial€news€coverage;€(b)€whether€other€measures€would€be€likely€toÏmitigate€the€effects€of€unrestrained€pretrial€publicity;€and€(c)€how€effectively€aÏrestraining€order€would€operate€to€prevent€the€threatened€danger."€€òòNebraska€Pressóó,Ð ô0”', Ð427€U.S.€at€562,€96€S.€Ct.€at€2804.€€The€precise€terms€of€the€restraining€order€bearÏcareful€consideration,€as€does€the€extent€to€which€the€record€supports€the€impositionÏof€the€extraordinary€entry€of€a€prior€restraint€on€publication.€òòNebraska€Pressóó,€427Ð X6ø,2 ÐU.S.€at€562,€96€S.€Ct.€at€2804.€€ÌÐ ð906 Ðò ò€ó óÔ‡XäìXX XäìÔà ` àà ¸ àñ;ñœñ;ñIn€òòHuskey€Ióó,€this€court€recognized€the€right€of€Sentinel€to€have€accessÐ `  Ðto€and€to€publish€information€from€the€summary€pages€of€the€ñ;ñtimesheetsñ;ññ;ñtime€sheetsñ;ñ.€€At€theÏpresent€juncture,€weñ;ñ›ñ;ñ€feel€compelled€to€express€our€concern€for€the€rights€andÏabilities€of€this€and€other€indigent€criminal€defendants€to€be€represented€by€counselÏand€to€receive€compensation€for€the€individuals€who€provide€them€with€legal€andÏother€expert€services€without€nondiscoverable€information€being€made€public€via€theÏFirst€Amendment.€€In€support€of€its€order€in€òòHuskey€Ióó,€the€trial€court€found€that€theÐ 4Ô  Ðforms€approved€by€AOC€for€use€by€counsel€in€submitting€claims€for€fees€andÏexpenses€required€detailed€and€specific€information.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€Sup.€Ct.€13,€ððÐ Ìl Ð6(a).€The€court€noted€that€the€AOCððs€forms€required€counsel€to€set€forth€ð ðthe€natureÏof€the€work€that€is€performed,€the€individuals€that€are€òòinterviewed€and€consultedóó,€theÐ d Ðinvestigative€and€research€efforts€that€have€been€made,€along€with€the€dates€theseÏservices€were€rendered€and€the€amount€of€time€spent€on€each€activity.ðð€€(EmphasisÏadded.)€€The€trial€court€also€referred€to€the€information€defense€counsel€must€submitÏin€order€to€obtain€the€trial€courtððs€authorization€for€payment€for€expert€services.€ÏòòSeeóóTenn.€R.€Sup.€Ct.€13,€ðð€5(b).€€The€trial€court€in€òòHuskey€Ióó€found€thatÐ `$ Ðð ðunrestrained€public€access€to€such€information€before€trial€could€be€anÏunacceptable€invasion€of€a€defendantððs€constitutional€right€to€a€fair€and€impartialÏtrial.ðð€€We€agree€that€the€disclosure€of€information€that€could€be€contained€inÏdefense€counselððs€application€for€fees,€expenses€and€authorizations€couldÏimpermissibly€impair€a€defendantððs€right€to€a€fair€trial.€€Moreover,€we€are€concernedÏthat€the€procedure€mandated€in€Supreme€Court€Rule€13€for€claiming€and€approvingÏcompensation€and€fees€in€cases€of€indigency€may€imperil€the€right€to€a€fair€trial€onlyÏfor€indigent€defendants.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àRule€of€Criminal€Procedure€16(b)€provides€for€the€disclosure€of€certainÏdefense€information€to€the€prosecution,€including,€under€the€proper€preliminaryÏcircumstances,€ð ðany€results€or€reports€of€physical€or€mental€examinations€and€ofÐ ð906 Ðscientific€tests€or€experiments,ðð€but€only€when€ð ðthe€defendant€intends€to€introduceÏ[them]€as€evidence€in€chief€at€trial€or€which€were€prepared€by€a€witness€whom€theÏdefendant€intends€to€call€at€the€trial€when€the€results€or€reports€relate€to€the€witnessððÏtestimony.ðð€€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€App.€16(b)(1)(B).€€A€request€for€authorization€for€expertÏservices€under€Supreme€Court€Rule€13,€section€5€might€include€services€which€areÏnot€intended€to€result€in€trial€evidence€or€testimony,€such€as€in€the€case€of€a€mereÏconsultation.€€A€consultation€or€investigative„type€conversation€might€also€beÏdivulged€on€an€attorney€fee€claim€form€through€the€itemization€of€the€time€spent€byÏcounsel.€€Evidence€of€such€consultations,€even€though€it€may€not€be€discoverableÏunder€Rule€of€Criminal€Procedure€16,€might€be€nevertheless€ð ðdiscoveredðð€throughÏpublication€that€is€based€upon€the€assertion€of€First€Amendment€rights.€€To€theÏextent€that€Rule€13€creates€the€procedure€by€which€this€disclosure€or€ð ðdiscoveryððÏcould€occur,€it€is€a€risk€visited€only€upon€indigent€defendants.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àOur€concern€about€this€issue€is€not€squarely€addressed€by€Sentinel.€ÏIn€òòNebraska€Pressóó€and€in€other€cases€cited€by€Sentinel,€the€court€was€faced€with€theÐ T$ô Ðchallenge€of€rampant€pretrial€publicity€that€might€influence€potential€jurors.€€òòSeeóó,Ð  &À  Ðòòe.g.óó,€òòHunt€v.€NBCóó,€872€F.2d€289€(9th€Cir.€1989);€òòJoseph€Lyle€Menendez€v.€FoxÐ ì'Œ" ÐBroad.€Co.óó,€22€Media€L.€Rep.€(BNA)€1702,€No.€94€2339€R€(C.D.€Cal.€Apr.€19,€1994).€Ð ¸)X $ ÐIn€òòNebraska€Pressóó,€the€Supreme€Court€indicated€that€there€are€various€alternativesÐ „+$"& Ðfor€dealing€with€pretrial€publicity€and€that€prior€restraint€is€essentially€a€last€resort.€ÏIn€the€present€case,€however,€the€public€impact€of€pretrial€publicity€does€not€appearÏto€be€the€primary€evil.€€Rather,€this€case€presents€a€different€concern„„that€ofÏprejudice€to€the€òòdynamicsóó€of€the€defense€via€the€prosecution€gaining€otherwiseÐ ´2T). Ðnondiscoverable€information.€€In€this€situation,€less€restrictive€alternatives„„otherÏthan€sealing€the€records€involved„„are€not€as€apparent.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€Record€Co.€v.Ð L6ì,2 ÐSouth€Carolinaóó,€322€S.C.€346,€„„„,€504€S.E.2d€592,€597„95€(S.C.€1997)€(priorÐ 8¸.4 Ðrestraint€of€publication€of€surreptitiously€recorded€conversation€between€capitalÐ ä9„06 Ðdefendant€and€his€attorney€upheld,€based€not€only€upon€the€threat€of€pretrialÏpublicity€to€ñ;ñœñ;ñdefendant'sñ;ñ›ñ;ñ€right€to€a€fair€trial,€but€also€upon€jeopardy€to€defendantððsÏright€to€effective€assistance€of€counsel)€(Toal,€J.,€concurring€and€dissenting),€òòpet.Ð ø ˜ Ðfor€cert.€filedóó€(U.S.€Dec.€23,€1998).€€Accordingly,€we€anticipated€a€heightenedÐ Äd Ðvigilance€for€the€indigent€criminal€defendantððs€rights€in€the€case€before€us,€providedÏthe€peril€to€those€rights€is€readily€apparent€from€the€proof€of€record.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àObviously,€any€analysis€of€the€constitutional€rights€of€Huskey€asÏjuxtaposed€to€the€constitutional€rights€of€Sentinel€must€include€an€understanding€ofÏthe€precise€nature€and€extent€of€the€threat€to€Huskeyððs€rights.€€In€this€case,€theÏnature€and€extent€of€this€threat€can€only€be€determined€upon€an€examination€of€theÏdetailed€time€sheets„„the€very€materials€that€Sentinel€has€been€restrained€fromÏpublishing€and€which€serve€as€the€basis€for€Huskeyððs€claims€of€risk.€€Nevertheless,Ïwe€are€amazed€to€find€that€the€record€on€appeal,€even€as€supplemented€by€thisÏcourtððs€order,€contains€no€detailed€time€sheets€nor€any€portion€of€such€documents.€ÏDespite€Huskeyððs€protestations,€which€may€be€well„founded,€we€do€not€know€whatÏthe€detailed€time€sheets€contain.€€Consequently,€we€are€unable€to€review€theÏconstitutionality€of€the€prior€restraint€on€its€ñ;ñœñ;ñmerits.€€Neither€are€we€able€to€review€theÏmerits€of€Huskey's€appellate€issues.ñ;ñ›ñ;ñÌÌÔ#† XäìXXXäì#\#Ôà ` àà ¸ àñ;ñœñ;ñTo€illustrate€the€futility€of€any€attempt€to€resolve€this€case,€we€point€outÐ P-ð#( Ðthat€we€could€not€determine€any€preciseñ;ñ›ñ;ñ€contours€for€an€injunction,€ñ;ñœñ;ñwere€we€toñ;ñ›ñ;ñÏñ;ñœñ;ñconcludeñ;ñ›ñ;ñ€that€a€narrowly€drawn€restraint€was€justified.€€The€lack€of€the€pertinentÏdetailed€time€records€denies€this€court€any€basis€for€a€surgical€order€that€mightÏserve€to€protect€the€worthy€constitutional€interests€of€both€parties.€€Without€theÏspecific€records,€any€such€order€would€have€to€be€generalized,€such€as€to€ban€theÏpublication€of€any€information€that€would€not€be€discoverable€by€the€state€underÏRule€of€Criminal€Procedure€16(b).€€Obviously,€such€an€order€would€be€unsatisfactoryÐ ä9„06 Ðand€would€invite€subsequent,€if€not€successive,€rounds€of€ñ;ñœñ;ñlitigationñ€;ñ.ñ€;ññ;ñ›œñ;ññ;ñ€ñ;ññ‚;ññ;ñoriñ;ññ‚;ññ„;ññƒ;ñopñƒ;ññ„;ññ…;ñprompted€byÏdisagreements€añ…;ññ‰;ññ…;ñtñ…;ññ‰;ññŠ;ñsñŠ;ññ…;ñ€to€whether€specific€datñ…;ññ†;ññ…;ñeñ…;ññ†;ññ‡;ña€ñ‡;ññ‰;ñ›ñ‰;ññˆ;ñfañˆ;ññ‹;ññˆ;ñkkñˆ;ññ‹;ññŒ;ñllñŒ;ññˆ;ñ€wñˆ;ññ;ññˆ;ñuñˆ;ññ;ññŽ;ñiñŽ;ññˆ;ñthin€the€scope€of€Rule€16(B).ñˆ;ññ;ñ›ñ;ñÌÌà@DD&àò òIV.€€Conclusionó óˆÐ Äd Ðà ` àà ¸ àWhen€we€granted€the€parties'€applications€for€Rule€10€extraordinaryÏappellate€review,€we€anticipated€being€called€upon€to€address€vital€constitutionalÏissues€based€upon€a€review€of€the€actual€detailed€time€records€which€Sentinel€isÏprohibited€from€publishing€and€which€form€the€basis€for€Huskey's€claims€that€a€fairÏcriminal€trial€is€jeopardized.€€These€records€are€not€only€central€to€the€case,€they€òòareóóÐ Ìl Ðthe€case.€€Yet,€upon€reviewing€the€appellate€record€as€constituted€by€the€parties€viaÏRule€of€Appellate€Procedure€24(a),€substantial€portions€of€which€were€filed€on€theÏday€of€oral€argument€before€this€court,€we€find€the€necessary€time€records€areÏabsent.€€During€oral€argument,€we€implored€the€parties€to€give€careful€attention€toÏthe€record,€and€we€asked€that€immediately€after€argument€counsel€take€theÏopportunity€to€examine€the€transcript€and€transcript€exhibits€filed€that€morning.€€WeÏmade€an€attempt€to€have€the€record€supplemented€in€a€way€that€we€anticipatedÏwould€bring€the€necessary€records€from€North's€source€into€the€record€òòthrough€theÐ ,&Ì  Ðtrial€court€recordóó.€€We€were€frustrated€in€this€attempt.Ð ø'˜" ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àñÁ;ñœñÁ;ññ–;ñIt›€is›€sheer›€folly›€for›€this›€courñ–;ññ—;ñWe€are€ñ—;ññ˜;ññ—;ñyañ—;ñt›€ñ˜;ññ™;ñunable€ñ™;ñtoñÁ;ñ›ñÁ;ñ€adjudicate€important€constitutional€rights€which€areÏdetermined€by€the€contents€of€documents€which€are€not€before€ñ;ñœñ;ñus.ñ;ñ׃)×ñ;ññ;ñ׃×ñ;ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú12Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€òòSeeóó€òòNebraskaÐ \-ü#( ÐPressóó,€427€U.S.€at€562,€96€S.€Ct.€at€2804€(careful€consideration€should€be€given€toÐ `  Ðextent€to€which€record€supports€the€extraordinary€imposition€of€€a€prior€restraint€onÏpublication).€ñ;ñ›ñ;ñ€Accordingly,€we€conclude€that€the€Rule€10€appeals€of€both€partiesÏwere€improvidently€granted,€and€the€same€are€hereby€dismissed.€€òòSeeóó€òòDianaÐ Äd ÐWalker€Lynch€v.€Charles€Drew€Lynchóó,€No.€02A01„9405„CV„00126€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.,Ð 0 ÐWestern€Section,€Dec.€14,€1995)€(opinion€and€order).Ìñ;ñœñ;ññ;ñÌñ;ññ;ñ›ñ;ñÌÓÓà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à________________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJAMES€CURWOOD€WITT,€JR.,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌ_______________________________ÌJERRY€L.€SMITH,€JUDGEÌÌÌ_______________________________ÌNORMA€McGEE€OGLE,€JUDGEÌÌ