ÿWPCd  X$Ѱ!¡™z–ÿdW¤BŠ;9P½0zV>¨ v uú³¹A%ê«>½ý!}«ªfÁ¦æEmH6¹ÿX8¼Äñì³E~9íé®Ú'BïrÑoà¾Xy´€ïcÿ*KÔ!ØyÙ5Y_IÒ#a ªüåf‡Jx|U*ÒsÏNfJJxí=«UW¡ŒA[©msô\ß½n’¿E@ù8Œî=¤³Q× ð]ÁÈ"È,ñMOìl\4vÅZÊ)v1,šî$4‚î#7¿L„á0o,ñcû™ú:$–½ÚúPN/—BI2=ÄŸØ_ }†TŠlC=Jà´ûåW•²¨ò¢ÊsˆåìϤ¸åýë*V…HžË,PS”½‹B”D,T²ãšp2ê¬ÆÜ4ÕÒŽðs "\=ƒ‡ø¢OrVvvðœzc⚇°‰¿L¦üÌÏTÐ4=ïÕ†ÞfJ[üxûÏòKÙý`^\Ëï¼ÝõûôöΕ—÷ýËEp”™%ÇMn„—·=AIUL‘’”»Áó×om¢pµ{oôjÌX5âÍ´cÂvI2úñxf³+‡`GwX×zìIÜk%eïÛ IpQYÓ’QŸ¿@cEüEKa*’b %\^ b 0ˆnUNöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ ‘ Æ™ Æ_ Æ% Æë ë N± 0D³³E÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷ D1ùù B*******bGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG 0ýOOOO BLL 0¤i D3  D-@ 0Kmm AS¸Æ  0¤Ñ 0Du A«¹»2¬)L (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular¬sp'H£\^¥3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0 Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó'')÷ÿ! dxdxüÿP Pd- ù-(82Îè$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€`»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÓ °œX°œXÓòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€Xc X»»Ô d(|3g$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€`»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3g$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€`»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€`»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ€¼`»»»ÔÑ8€c XXdæ»»d8Ñà@HHìàIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@''%ìàAT€JACKSONˆÐ ¾ ÐÔ‡Xc X»¼`ÔÌò òÔ#†¼`»XXc y#ÔÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€REGGIE€Ô_ÔRAMONTÔ_Ô€JONESÔ‡Xc X»¼`Ôó óÐ ² ÐÓ¿ÓÌà@¼ ¼ ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Ô_ÔHaywoodÔ_Ô€CountyˆÐ ¦ ö Ðà@( ( ìàNo.€3071€€€€€€William€B.€Ô_ÔAcreeÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€JudgeˆÐ Œ Ü ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<= ` A߈Ð > Ž  ÐÌà@G G ìàNo.€W1999„00898„CCA„R3„CD€„€Decided€August€18,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ԈР3ƒ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<þ` AßÐ ÿO  Ðó óÌThe€defendant€was€found€guilty€of€aggravated€robbery,€theft€over€$10,000€and€felonious€escape.€€TheÐ ôD  Ðtrial€court€merged€the€theft€conviction€into€the€aggravated€robbery€conviction.€€Ô#†¼`»XXc #ÔÔ‡Xc X»¼`ÔDefendant€receivedÐ Ú*  Ða€ten„year€sentence€for€aggravated€robbery€and€a€consecutive€one„year€sentence€for€felonious€escape.€Ð À ÐThe€defendant€raises€the€following€issues€for€review:€€(1)€whether€the€defendant's€prosecution€inÐ ¦ö ÐÔ_ÔHaywoodÔ_Ô€County€for€aggravated€robbery,€€following€an€acquittal€for€the€same€offense€in€federalÐ ŒÜ Ðcourt,€violated€double€jeopardy;€€(2)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€failing€to€grant€a€new€trial€whenÐ r Ðit€was€discovered€that€a€juror€had€a€prior€felony€conviction;€and€€(3)€€whether€the€defendant€wasÐ X¨ Ðimproperly€convicted€of€both€aggravated€robbery€and€the€lesser„included€offense€of€theft.€€Upon€aÐ >Ž Ðreview€of€the€record,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€€Ð $t ÐÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmed.ó óÐ ð@ ÐÌòòRileyÔ#†¼`»àXc #ÔÔ‡Xc X.¼`Ôóó,€J.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòÔ_ÔTiptonÔ_Ôóó€and€òòWilliams,€JJ.,óó€joined.Ð ¼  ÐÌDavid€W.€Camp,€Jackson,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Reggie€Ô_ÔRamontÔ_Ô€Jones.Ð ˆØ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Mark€E.€Davidson,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð T¤ ÐÔ_ÔClayburnÔ_Ô€L.€Ô_ÔPeeplesÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Theodore€H.€Neumann,€Assistant€DistrictÐ : Š  ÐAttorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð  !p! ÐÌÌà@55'ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼`»XXc Ÿ #ÔÔ‡Xc X»¼`ԈРÒ#"$ ÐÌÓ  Óòòò òFACTSÐ ž%î & ÐÌóóó óÓ  ÓÌà  àOn€December€22,€1997,€Carlton€Shaw€and€Alex€Jones,€defendantððs€brother,€entered€theÐ P( #) ÐVolunteer€Bank€in€Brownsville,€Tennessee.€€Witnesses€testified€that€the€men€were€wearing€longÐ 6)†$* Ðtrench€coats,€masks,€hats€and€gloves.€€A€teller€at€the€bank€testified€that€Jones€reached€around€aÐ *l%+ Ðcustomer€and€pointed€a€gun€at€her€and€demanded€money.€€After€Shaw€and€Jones€were€given€money,Ð +R&, Ðthey€fled€the€bank€and€ran€across€the€parking€lot€near€Church€Street.€€Agent€Adams€of€the€TennesseeÐ è+8'- ÐBureau€of€Investigation€found€two€coats,€several€hats,€a€pink€stocking€and€pieces€of€a€dollar€bill€inÐ Î,(. Ðthe€alley€near€the€bank.€€The€bank€manager€testified€that€the€total€amount€stolen€was€$14,€292.€Ô#†¼`»XXc ‰ #ÔÔ‡Xc X»¼`ԀР´-)/ý7 ÐÔ_Ô‡€à  àAnother€teller€testified€that€a€strange€man,€later€identified€as€Carlton€Shaw,€entered€the€bankÐ ° Ðearlier€in€the€day€and€was€ð ðlooking€around.ðð€€Shaw€asked€her€where€he€could€get€a€hair€cut€and€thenÐ –æ Ðexited€the€bank.€Ô#†¼`»XXc E#ÔÐ |Ì ÐÔ€Xc X»¼`ÔÌà  àFollowing€an€extensive€investigation,€the€authorities€interrogated€the€defendant.€€TheÐ H˜ Ðdefendant€told€F.B.I.€Agent€Lewoczko€that€he€received€a€call€from€his€brother,€Alex€Jones,€on€theÐ . ~ Ðday€of€the€robbery.€€He€stated€his€brother€asked€him€to€pick€up€Shaw€and€him€on€Church€Street.€€TheÐ  d Ðdefendant€stated€that€when€he€arrived€at€Church€Street,€neither€his€brother€nor€Shaw€was€there.€€HeÐ ú J Ðthen€received€a€call€on€his€cell€phone,€and€his€brother€told€him€to€come€to€Shawððs€residence.€€He€saidÐ à 0 Ðthat€when€he€picked€the€two€men€up€at€Shawððs€house,€they€informed€him€they€had€just€robbed€theÐ Æ   ÐVolunteer€Bank€and€had€worn€womenððs€clothing,€which€they€discarded€in€the€alley€near€the€bank.€Ð ¬ ü  ÐThe€defendant€stated€that€he€drove€the€men€to€Jackson€and€rented€a€room€at€the€Ramada€Inn.€€A€nightÐ ’â  Ðclerk€at€the€Ramada€Inn€identified€a€receipt€indicating€the€defendant€rented€the€room.€€The€defendant€Ð xÈ  Ðtold€Agent€Lewoczko€he€received€$500€that€evening,€and€that€he€later€received€$490€from€hisÐ ^®  Ðbrother.€€At€trial,€however,€the€defendant€denied€giving€much€of€the€information€contained€in€theÐ D”  Ðalleged€statement.€€Ð *z  ÐÌà  àThe€most€damning€testimony€came€from€Carlton€Shaw,€who€testified€that€the€defendant€andÐ öF Ðdefendantððs€brother€planned€the€robbery.€€He€stated€his€job€was€to€go€in€and€check€the€bank€outÐ Ü, Ðbefore€the€robbery€and€then€rob€the€bank€with€Alex€Jones,€who€would€be€armed.€€He€further€statedÐ Â Ðit€was€the€defendant€who€suggested€the€two€dress€in€womenððs€clothing,€and€that€the€clothing€he€andÐ ¨ø ÐAlex€Jones€used€belonged€to€the€defendantððs€deceased€mother.€€He€testified€that€the€defendant€tookÐ ŽÞ Ðhim€to€the€bank€so€that€he€could€ð ðcheck€it€out.ðð€€Afterwards,€he€and€Alex€Jones€robbed€the€bank,€ranÐ tÄ Ðto€Church€Street,€and€hid€until€the€defendant€picked€them€up.€€Shaw€testified€that€the€defendant€thenÐ Zª Ðdrove€them€to€Jackson;€defendant€rented€a€hotel€room€at€the€Ramada€Inn;€and€the€three€men€split€theÐ @ Ðmoney€from€the€robbery.Ð &v ЀÌà  àDefendant€was€first€indicted€on€federal€bank€robbery€charges€and€was€acquitted€after€a€trial.€Ð òB ÐShortly€thereafter,€the€defendant€was€arrested€on€the€subject€state€charges.€€While€at€the€policeÐ Ø( Ðstation,€the€defendant€fled€and€escaped€custody.€€He€was€apprehended€approximately€fifteen€minutesÐ ¾ Ðlater.€€Ð ¤ô ÐÌà  àThe€jury€found€the€defendant€guilty€of€aggravated€robbery,€theft€over€$10,000€and€feloniousÐ p!À  Ðescape.€€He€received€a€ten„year€sentence€for€aggravated€robbery€and€a€consecutive€one„year€sentenceÐ V"¦! Ðfor€felonious€escape.€€The€trial€court€merged€the€theft€conviction€into€the€aggravated€robberyÐ <#Œ" Ðconviction.€Ð "$r# ÐÌÓ  Óòòò òI.€DOUBLE€JEOPARDYóóó óÐ î%>!% ÐÌÓ  Óà  àThe€defendant€first€argues€that€his€prosecution€for€aggravated€robbery,€following€his€acquittalÐ º' #' Ðin€federal€court€for€bank€robbery,€violated€the€principles€of€double€jeopardy.€€He€contends€theÐ  (ð#( Ðevidence€presented€at€both€trials€was€virtually€the€same.€€Therefore,€he€argues€the€state€prosecutionÐ †)Ö$) Ðwas€a€ð ðsham,ðð€and€the€dual€sovereignty€doctrine€does€not€apply.€€Ð l*¼%* ÐÌà  àWe€first€note€that€we€do€not€have€the€record€of€the€federal€prosecution€before€us.€€Neither€theÐ 8,ˆ', Ðfederal€indictment€nor€a€transcript€of€the€federal€proceeding€is€in€the€record.€€Several€state€witnessesÐ ° Ðstated€that€they€testified€in€the€federal€prosecution€where€defendant€was€acquitted.€€Without€a€properÐ –æ Ðrecord,€however,€we€are€unable€to€make€any€meaningful€determination€as€to€the€evidence€presentedÐ |Ì Ðat€the€federal€trial.€€The€failure€to€present€an€adequate€record€precludes€relief.€€òòState€v.€Ballardóó,€855Ð b² ÐS.W.2d€557,€560€(Tenn.€1993);€òòState€v.€Robertsóó,€755€S.W.2d€833,€836€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988).€€Ð H˜ ÐÌà  àNevertheless,€even€if€we€could€make€that€determination,€we€find€the€dual€sovereigntyÐ  d Ðdoctrine€is€applicable€to€the€state€prosecution.€€The€long„standing€doctrine€regarding€prosecution€byÐ ú J Ðdual€sovereignties€is€expressed€in€òòUnited€States€v.€Wheeleróó,€435€U.S.€313,€98€S€Ct.€1079,€55€L.Ed.2dÐ à 0 Ð303€(1978).€€ð ð[A]€federal€prosecution€does€not€bar€a€subsequent€state€prosecution€of€the€same€personÐ Æ   Ðfor€the€same€acts,€and€a€state€prosecution€does€not€bar€a€federal€one€.€.€.€[P]rosecutions€under€the€lawsÐ ¬ ü  Ðof€separate€sovereigns€do€not€.€.€.€subject€[the€defendant]€for€the€same€offence€to€be€twice€put€inÐ ’â  Ðjeopardy.ðð€€òòIdóó.€at€317.€€Tennessee€courts€specifically€uphold€and€adhere€to€this€doctrine.€€òòSee,€e.g.,Ð xÈ  ÐóóòòLavon€v.€Stateóó,€586€S.W.2d€112,113„14€(Tenn.€1979);€òòState€v.€Holmesóó,€995€S.W.2d€135,€139€(Tenn.Ð ^®  ÐCrim.€App.€1998).€€Ð D”  ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€cites€òòBartkus€v.€Illinoisóó,€359€U.S.121,€79€S.Ct.€676,€3€L.Ed.2d€684€(1959),Ð ` Ðcontending€that€where€a€state€prosecution€is€influenced€and€controlled€by€the€federal€authorities,€€theÐ öF Ðtrial€does€not€represent€an€action€by€a€separate€and€distinct€sovereign;€therefore,€it€is€barred€byÐ Ü, Ðdouble€jeopardy.€€He€claims€that€the€cooperation€between€the€Federal€Bureau€of€Investigation€andÐ Â Ðstate€law€enforcement€authorities€indicates€the€state€prosecution€was€a€ð ðsham€and€a€cover€for€[the]Ð ¨ø Ðfederal€prosecution.ðð€òòId.óó€at€124.€€Ð ŽÞ ÐÌà  àDefendant€has€not€established€that€the€state€prosecution€was€a€sham€or€a€cover€for€the€federalÐ Zª Ðprosecution.€€The€fact€that€similar€testimony€was€given€at€both€trials€and€the€arrest€occurred€only€aÐ @ Ðfew€days€after€the€federal€acquittal€is€not€determinative€of€the€double€jeopardy€issue.€€This€issue€hasÐ &v Ðno€merit.€€Ð  \ ÐÌÓ  Óò òòòII.€€JUROR€DISQUALIFICATIONóóó óÐ Ø( ÐÌÓ  Óà  àDefendant€contends€one€of€the€jurors€who€served€in€the€case€was€a€convicted€felon€and,Ð ¤ô Ðtherefore,€not€qualified€to€sit€as€a€juror.€òò€Seeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€22„1„102(a)(1).€€Defendant€seeksÐ Š Ú Ða€new€trial€based€upon€this€alleged€error.€€We€conclude€defendant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€thisÐ p!À  Ðissue.€€Ð V"¦! ÐÓæ+ÓÌà@@ííìàò òA.€€Factual€BackgroundÐ "$r# Ðó óÓ  ÓÌà  àSubsequent€to€trial,€defense€counsel€learned€that€one€of€the€jurors€had€a€prior€felonyÐ î%>!% Ðconviction.€€Evidence€adduced€at€the€hearing€on€the€motion€for€new€trial€indicated€that€the€jurorÐ Ô&$"& Ðcompleted€the€appropriate€juror€questionnaire€upon€being€summoned€for€jury€service€in€HaywoodÐ º' #' ÐCounty.€€The€juror€indicated€on€the€questionnaire€that€he€had€a€1983€conviction€for€joyriding.€Ð  (ð#( ÐJoyriding€was€a€felony€at€that€time.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„5„104.€€However,€the€juror€was€neverÐ †)Ö$) Ðadvised€that€he€was€disqualified€from€jury€service€and€was€ultimately€chosen€on€the€panel.€€ThereÐ l*¼%* Ðis€no€indication€that€the€juror€misled€the€court€as€to€his€qualifications,€nor€is€there€any€indication€thatÐ R+¢&+ Ðthe€juror€falsely€answered€or€was€even€asked€any€questions€during€òòvoir€direóó€concerning€priorÐ 8,ˆ', Ðconvictionsòòóó.€€€€Ð ° ÐÓÓ-ÓÌà@@ôô$ìàò òB.€€Analysisó óÐ |Ì ÐÌÓ  Óà  àChallenges€to€juror€qualifications€generally€fall€into€two€categories;€namely,€òòpropterÐ H˜ Ðdefectum€óóand€òòpropter€affectumóó.€€òòPartin€v.€Hendersonóó,€686€S.W.2d€587,€589€(Tenn.€App.€1984).€Ð . ~ ÐObjections€based€upon€general€statutory€disqualifications€are€considered€òòpropter€defectum€óóandÐ  d Ðgenerally€must€be€challenged€prior€to€the€return€of€the€jury€verdict.€€òòState€v.€Akinsóó,€867€S.W.2d€350,Ð ú J Ð355€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€On€the€other€hand,€objections€based€upon€bias€and€partiality€towardÐ à 0 Ða€party€are€classified€as€òòpropter€affectumóó€and€may€be€made€after€the€return€of€the€verdict.€€òòDurhamÐ Æ   Ðv.€Stateóó,€182€Tenn.€577,€582,€188€S.W.2d€555,€559€(1945);€òòState€v.€Furloughóó,€797€S.W.2d€631,€652Ð ¬ ü  Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1990).€€In€the€case€at€bar,€the€objection€based€upon€the€statutory€disqualificationÐ ’â  Ðof€a€prior€felony€is€considered€in€the€category€of€òòpropter€defectumóó.€€Ð xÈ  ÐÌà  àAlthough€òòpropter€defectumóó€challenges€are€generally€considered€waived€if€not€raised€prior€toÐ D”  Ðthe€verdict,€there€are€exceptions.€€Waiver€does€not€occur€if€bias€is€shown€to€exist,€or€if€the€jurorÐ *z  Ðanswered€falsely.€€òòState€v.€Dickóó,€872€S.W.2d€938,€946€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€Ð ` ÐÌà  àA€similar€scenario€was€presented€in€òòState€v.€Joseph€D.€Bishopóó,€CCA€No.€01C01„9309„CR„Ð Ü, Ð00333,€Davidson€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€filed€September€1,€1994,€at€Nashville),€òòperm.€to€app.Ð Â Ðdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1995).€€There€a€convicted€felon€served€on€the€jury;€however,€this€was€not€known€orÐ ¨ø Ðraised€until€after€the€verdict.€€Finding€no€bias€or€false€answers€given€by€the€juror,€this€courtÐ ŽÞ Ðconcluded€the€failure€to€raise€the€issue€prior€to€the€verdict€precluded€any€relief.€€Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àWe€distinguish€the€case€at€bar€from€òòState€v.€Bondurantóó,€4€S.W.3d€662€(Tenn.€1999),€and€òòStateÐ @ Ðv.€Lynnóó,€924€S.W.2d€892€(Tenn.€1996).€€These€two€cases€involved€flagrant,€unreasonable€andÐ &v Ðunnecessary€deviations€from€the€statutory€procedures€relating€to€jury€selection.€€òòBondurantóó,€4€S.W.3dÐ  \ Ðat€668„69;€òòLynnóó,€924€S.W.2d€at€898.€€Such€deviations€are€not€present€in€the€case€at€bar;€thus,€thereÐ òB Ðis€no€presumption€of€prejudice€to€the€judicial€process.€€Ð Ø( ÐÌà  àUnder€the€general€rule,€the€failure€of€the€defendant€to€challenge€this€juror€prior€to€the€juryÐ ¤ô Ðverdict€waives€the€right€to€challenge€the€juror€thereafter.€€Furthermore,€neither€exception€to€theÐ Š Ú Ðgeneral€rule€applies.€€There€is€absolutely€no€showing€or€any€indication€that€the€juror€was€biased€orÐ p!À  Ðpartial.€€Furthermore,€there€is€absolutely€no€indication€that€the€juror€answered€any€questions€falselyÐ V"¦! Ðwith€regard€to€the€prior€conviction.€€For€these€reasons,€the€defendant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€thisÐ <#Œ" Ðissue.€€Ð "$r# ÐÓ2Óòòò òIII.€€THEFT€CHARGEÐ %X $ ÐÌÓ  Óóóó óà  àThe€defendant€argues€that€theft€of€property€over€$10,000€is€a€lesser„included€offense€ofÐ Ô&$"& Ðaggravated€robbery;€thus,€he€can€not€be€convicted€of€both€offenses.€€Ð º' #' ÐÌà  àThe€record€reveals€the€trial€court€properly€merged€the€defendantððs€conviction€for€theft€ofÐ †)Ö$) Ðproperty€over€$10,000€with€his€conviction€for€aggravated€robbery.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€William€JasonÐ l*¼%* ÐMcMahanóó,€C.C.A.€03C01„9707„CR„00262,€Knox€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€filed€March€31,€1999,Ð R+¢&+ Ðat€Knoxville).€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€court€only€reflects€convictions€for€aggravated€robbery€andÐ 8,ˆ', Ðescape.€€Furthermore,€the€sentencing€hearing€reveals€the€defendant€was€only€sentenced€for€these€twoÐ ° Ðoffenses.€€€€Ð –æ ÐÌà@¥¥#ìàò òòòIV.€CONCLUSIONó óóóˆÐ b² ÐÌà  àIn€summary,€we€conclude€(1)€there€has€been€no€double€jeopardy€violation;€(2)€defendant€isÐ . ~ Ðnot€entitled€to€relief€based€upon€juror€disqualification;€and€(3)€the€trial€court€properly€merged€theÐ  d Ðtheft€conviction€into€the€aggravated€robbery€conviction.€€Thus,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€isÐ ú J Ðaffirmed.€€