ÿWPCÌ …# VUNa %¯ 0(µw@Ý4 1 @ 0lH 0D´ 0Jø 0TB 0^– 0hô 0r\ 0|Î 0†J 0Ð 1u` 0dÕ U>9 BwB)”DC½U* AM*ìwv~cvÓá D3´ 0@ç AO'Æv 0D< D/€ B¯˜HP LaserJet 4 PlusHPPCL5MS,ð,,,,,ð0nLhÎ(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡ bUc[d[eDfDgUhUiUjKekÓ€Úƒç"?Ž3|xv((3üÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman d% Line 7 d####7Border 1dd< Œ 9p`(Arial€-$Cþÿ << Gÿÿ âÝ ƒ!ÝÔ€!ÔÝ  ÝÔ€%ÔÔ€%ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€%XÔÌÌò òOctober€22,€1997ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€%ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó óPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHØ(d'`Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  ion-F Geneva ÒÒ  ion-F Geneva Ò""""'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€!ÔÝ  Ý›Ò  ÒÒ ° ÒÒ  ÒÒ 8 ÒÑ\R AØ'\ќـ€ÙÓ  ÓÑ\R AØ'\ÑÔ€%ÔßR€&'$A1-j|` Å `€€@ÿRß›Þ ÞÌà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌà@ àAT€KNOXVILLEÌÌà@ àAPRIL€1997€SESSIONÌÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà à)à àC.C.A.€No.€03C01„9607„CC„00260Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àAppellee,à àà àà à)à àBLOUNT€COUNTYÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)ÌVS.à àà àà àà àà àà à)à àò òHON.€D.€KELLY€THOMAS,ÏJUDGEó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)ÌMICHAEL€W.€KAUFMANN,à àà à)à à(Aggravated€Burglary,€2€counts,Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)€€€€€€€€€€€Forgery,€Theft)ÌÒ  ÒÒ À Òà àà àAppellant.à àà àà à)ÌÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à àà àà àà àòòFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:ÌÌò òMACK€GARNERà àà àà àà àà àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPó óÌDistrict€Public€Defenderà àà àà àà àAttorney€General€and€ReporterÌ419€High€Streetà àà àà àÌMaryville,€TN€37801à àà àà àà àò òCLINTON€J.€MORGANÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àó óAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€Parkwayò òÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àó óNashville,€TN€37243„0493ò òÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àMIKE€FLYNNó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àò òPHILLIP€MORTONÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àó óAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà à363€Court€StreetÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àMaryville,€TN€37801ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌò òOPINION€FILED:€€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€ÌÌÌóóAFFIRMEDÌÌÌÌCHRIS€CRAFT,€ÌSPECIAL€JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌó óà@ àò òO€P€I€N€I€O€NÌÑ7€ü¦XdðXXdð7ÑÌÌÓÓó óà àThe€defendant,€Michael€Kaufmann,€appeals€as€of€right€from€a€sentenceÏimposed€by€the€Blount€County€Circuit€Court.€€He€entered€guilty€pleas€to€fiveÏindictments:€two€Aggravated€Burglary€indictments€(eight€years),€€Theft€over€$1,000Ï(four€years),€Theft€over€$500€(two€years)€and€Uttering€a€Forged€Instrument€(twoÏyears),€all€concurrent,€as€a€Range€II€Multiple€Offender,€in€the€custody€of€theÏDepartment€of€Correction.€€A€sentencing€hearing€was€then€held€for€the€soleÏpurpose€of€determining€whether€these€five€convictions€would€be€servedÏconcurrently€or€consecutively€to€unexpired€sentences€he€was€then€serving€forÏcrimes€committed€in€Loudon€and€Anderson€Counties,€totaling€five€years.€€TheÏdefendant€contends€that€the€trial€judge€erred€in€ordering€that€the€effective€eightÏyear€sentence€for€his€Blount€County€crimes€be€served€consecutively€to€hisÏprevious€five€year€sentences.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ìà àWhen€an€appeal€challenges€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€aÏsentence,€this€Court€conducts€a€de€novo€review€with€a€presumption€that€theÏdetermination€of€the€trial€court€was€correct.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d)Ï(1990).€However,€this€presumption€of€correctness€is€"conditioned€upon€theÏaffirmative€showing€that€the€trial€court€in€the€record€considered€the€sentencingÏprinciples€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances."€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2dÏ166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€In€the€event€that€the€record€fails€to€demonstrate€suchÏconsideration,€review€of€the€sentence€is€purelyòò€de€novoóó.òò€Idóó.€If€appellate€reviewÏreflects€that€the€trial€court€properly€considered€all€relevant€factors€and€its€findingsÏof€fact€are€adequately€supported€by€the€record,€this€Court€must€affirm€the€sentence.ÏòòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€€Ìà àThe€procedure€the€trial€court€must€follow€in€deciding€whether€or€not€aÏsentence€should€be€served€concurrently€or€consecutively€with€another€unexpiredÏsentence€is€set€out€in€Rule€32(c)(2)€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Criminal€Procedure,Ïas€follows:ò òÌÓÓó óà0 àSentence€When€Defendant€Has€Prior€Sentence€Not€Fully€Served.€If€theÏdefendant€has€additional€sentences€not€yet€fully€served€as€the€result€ofÏconvictions€in€the€same€court€or€in€other€courts€of€this€state€and€if€this€fact€isÏmade€known€to€the€court€prior€to€sentencing,€the€court€shall€recite€this€in€theÏjudgment€setting€sentence,€and€the€sentence€imposed€shall€be€deemed€toÏbe€concurrent€with€the€prior€sentence€or€sentences,€unless€it€affirmativelyÏappears€that€the€new€sentence€being€imposed€is€to€be€served€consecutivelyÏwith€the€prior€sentence€or€sentences.€The€judgment€to€make€the€sentencesÏconsecutive€or€concurrent€shall€explicitly€recite€the€judge's€reasons€therefor,Ïand€is€reviewable€on€appeal.Ì€ÌÓÓThis€Court€has€previously€held€that€the€exercise€of€discretion€given€the€trial€courtÏby€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€App.€32(c)(2)€essentially€involves€the€consideration€of€theÍconsecutive€sentencing€criteria€provided€in€Tenn.€Code€.Ann.€ððÏ40„35„115(b)(1990).€€Seeòò€State€v.€Lisa€Gaye€Copelandóó,€1997€Tenn.€Crim.€App.ÏLEXIS€453,€No.€03C01„9605„CC„00196,€Knoxville,€May€13,€1997,€and€òòState€v.ÏThomas€Edward€Cappsóó,€1996€Tenn.€Crim.€App.€LEXIS€125,€No.Ï01C01„9506„CC„00164€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Nashville,€February€29,€1996).€€TheÏtrial€court€has€the€discretion€to€run€sentences€consecutively€if€it€finds€any€of€sevenÏcriteria€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence.Ìà àTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(b)€states€in€relevant€part€that€ð ðthe€court€mayÏorder€sentences€to€run€consecutively€if€the€court€finds€by€a€preponderance€of€theÏevidence€that:€(1)€The€defendant€is€a€professional€criminal€who€has€knowinglyÏdevoted€himself€to€criminal€acts€as€a€major€source€of€livelihood;€€(2)€The€defendantÏis€an€offender€whose€record€of€criminal€activity€is€extensive,ðð€and€ð ð(6)€TheÏdefendant€is€sentenced€for€an€offense€committed€while€on€probation.ðð€€The€trialÏjudge€found€all€three€of€these€criteria€applicable€to€the€defendant,€and€his€findingsÏare€amply€supported€by€the€record.€€Ìà àThe€presentence€report€and€testimony€of€the€defendant€show€that€he€servedÏ19€months€of€a€3€year€sentence€in€1984€for€trafficking€in€cocaine.€€In€1988,€aÏwarrant€was€issued€for€him€for€five€counts€of€fraud€involving€felony€bad€checks,Ïwhich€was€served€on€him€in€1991,€resulting€in€convictions.€€He€then€becameÏpartners€in€crime€with€a€friend€he€met€in€prison,€crossing€the€country€on€interstateÏhighways,€burglarizing€houses€close€to€shopping€malls€and€expressway€exits,Ïstealing€checks€and€forging€and€cashing€them€before€moving€to€the€next€county€orÏstate,€repeating€the€same€crimes€there.€€The€defendant€began€this€in€1993,€usingÍhis€half€of€the€proceeds€to€pay€rent,€bills€and€to€buy€cocaine€for€himself€and€hisÏgirlfriend.€€Between€trips€he€testified€he€would€work€one€or€two€days€a€weekÏmaking€golf€videos.€€Eventually€he€gave€up€his€video€business€in€1994,€when€heÏwas€arrested€and€convicted€under€a€false€name€for€Forgery€in€Florida.€€TheÏauthorities€placed€him€on€probation€for€five€years,€€not€knowing€his€real€identity.€ÏWhen€he€was€released€from€jail€on€probation,€instead€of€reporting€to€the€probationÏoffice,€he€and€his€partner€left€Florida,€working€their€way€up€the€interstateÏcommitting€burglaries,€and€stealing€and€cashing€checks€as€his€sole€source€ofÏlivelihood,€until€finally€arrested€in€Loudon€County,€Tennessee.€€The€defendantÏadmitted€that€he€was€on€probation€from€Florida€at€the€time€of€these€crimes,€and€thatÏat€the€time€of€sentencing€there€was€a€hold€placed€on€him€by€the€Federal€authoritiesÏfor€counterfeiting.Ìà àThe€trial€judge€found€that€the€defendant€was€a€professional€criminal€whoÏhas€knowingly€devoted€himself€to€criminal€acts€as€a€major€source€of€livelihood,€thatÏhis€record€of€criminal€activity€was€extensive,€and€that€he€was€on€probation€when€allÏhis€Tennessee€crimes€were€committed.€The€record€supports€this€determination.ÏWhether€sentences€are€to€be€served€concurrently€or€consecutively€is€a€matterÏaddressed€to€the€sound€discretion€of€the€trial€court.€òòState€v.€Jamesóó,€688€S.W.2dÏ463€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1984).€€The€record€also€shows€clearly€that€the€consecutiveÏsentences€are€necessary€to€protect€the€public€from€further€misconduct€by€theÏdefendant,€and€reasonably€reflect€the€severity€of€the€offenses.€See€òòState€v.ÏWilkersonóó,€905€S.W.2d€933,€938€(Tenn.€1995).€€ÌÌÌà àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€AFFIRMED.ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àóóCHRIS€CRAFT,€SPECIAL€JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€ÌóóJERRY€L.€SMITH,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€ÌóóJOE€RILEY,€JUDGE