ÿWPC €„÷[ð-FGˆh¸µIœ”w¿»‰jÑ•®$䜄ûaIžÀP ;v(š#Äe™È§N­ÂfÌŸÝ‹všx|„Ð=¼¿µ²YäÚþÆãr¢‘ɬè‡à^ò¼â„|Rh€ýi;ûy#Œq5"Ïâ2Wœ&¢Ö¦…Ü4ÁÞ†‘èš#½R>Ìn°s[NIéoÚL2bŸ^HzŒÏ6Ä>Š&<}lµ‰2䪜³VDC»¨í-’>IŒù.¶JÇ•Lz¼´J«Œ'ªµZ8XnÛL e«·Í}cU5N3Ï]Æ*ïGp  ž±d¦Ù/Šz5<Å4膻³[gyÛ-^ôŒ»}Bü_ú¦ƒÎTÏY瓜ɼº¸1üýâáÀS…~$¨ûšà(ßðÛ¯ÆèÒ 0t¾JÑ®óFqGÝíäÌý'î]LQ †=fhñ“ùê`O}žáºó©ýé…õ¬çÿ:,CÍA@õÌ¥LÔÑt\Í#Q¾FÐÚÄõ' ÒªBc/C·žŽ»šÎ²«‘Ÿ×_œÃ¨¢…,<ʬŠ}‹äŒ¯ÝáúÇíFšÕŠ6:ÜÍP»á…óI·.¿ÑœßG4™ “Ia¸œÿxç5Ü*4ËŸÃãYк£Ö7èIçQ… %F U:L 0(† UN® ¸ü ž´ ]R ǯ w@v¶ m¸4Ï 0lã 0DO“¢æ³U:™ÓÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ Bããã D3 0D3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 AOwÆÆÆ 0DŒ D/Ð BÿX, øð AZ‹"Arial Regular($¡¡(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman Regular ®Ò°ÒÓ  ÓÝ ƒ úÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThis€Court's€policy€is€to€identify€minor€victims€of€sex€crimes€by€their€initials. ”Ý ƒ úÝ$Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThis€Court's€policy€is€to€identify€minor€victims€of€sex€crimes€by€their€initials. SÒ°ÒÓ  ÓÝ ƒ úÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ýð ðCommunications€between€a€patient€and€a€licensed€physician€when€practicing€as€aÐ ° Ðpsychiatrist€in€the€course€of€and€in€connection€with€a€therapeutic€counseling€relationship€.Ï.€.€are€privileged€in€proceedings€before€judicial€.€.€.€tribunals.€€Neither€the€psychiatrist€nor€anyÏmember€of€the€staff€may€testify€or€be€compelled€to€testify€as€to€such€communications€orÏotherwise€reveal€them€in€such€proceedings€without€consent€of€the€patient€exceptðð€under€veryÏlimited€circumstances. ½à  à¹Ò°ÒÓ  ÓÝ ƒ úÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€privilege€does€not€apply€ð ðto€any€situation€involving€known€or€suspected€childÐ œì Ðsexual€abuse.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€37„1„614(1996).€€As€set€forth€above,€however,€H.K.€wasÏnot€a€ð ðchildðð€at€the€time€of€the€alleged€offenses.€€We€also€note€that€the€indictment€in€this€caseÏdoes€not€allege€child€sexual€abuse. ’“[”•E–—D˜™DšU›Ó€ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀuM%Q¨((3úÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó3|x¤ Ò°ÒÓ  ÓÝ ƒ úÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝHowever,€when€such€evidence€is€admitted,€the€state€must€elect€the€specific€offenseÐ ° Ðfor€which€it€seeks€conviction.€€òò¢Shelton£óó,€851€S.W.2d€at€137. ÜÔ€X¯žXXXÔÔ€ªXX¯žÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X¯žXªÔÐ  ÐÌApril€30,€1999ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAMÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular  d'''''ÿÿdxd(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÔ€X¯žXXXÔÓ  ÓÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7€“KXXdìdÈ7ÑÑ  Ññ›ñ›ñ›ññ›ñßr€*<,(j 8` `€€@Eȱ` 8ttxP°ð  rß›ñ›ñà@˜ ˜ àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° ÐÌà@FF'àAT€NASHVILLEˆÌÌà@ÒÒ$àMARCH€1999€SESSIONˆÌÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,ó óà@÷÷-à)ˆÐ  ` Ðà@÷÷-à)ˆà p àò òNO.€¢01C01£„9804„CR„00192ó óÐ ü L  Ðà ` àAppellee,à@÷÷-à)ˆÐ è 8  Ðà@÷÷-à)ˆà p àò òSUMNER€COUNTYó óÐ Î  Ðò ò¢VS£.ó óà@÷÷-à)ˆÐ º  Ðà@÷÷-à)ˆà p àò òHON.€JANE€¢WHEATCRAFT£,Ð ¦ö  ÐMICHAEL€D.€KEEN,ó óà@÷÷-à)ˆà p àò òJUDGEó óÐ ’â  Ðà@÷÷-à)ˆÌà ` àAppellant.à@÷÷-à)ˆà p à(Incest)Ð d´ ÐÌÌÌÒ(ä „¸ @(#(#(Òò òòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:Ð üL ÐÌDAVID€A.€DOYLEÌó óDistrict€Public€Defenderò òÐ À Ðó ó117€East€Main€StreetÐ ¦ö ТGallatin£,€TN€€€37066„2801Ì(On€appeal)ÌÌò òJOHN€¢D.€PELLEGRIN£Ð >Ž Ðó ó113€West€Main€StreetÐ *z ТGallatin£,€TN€€€37066„3231Ì(At€trial)Ð ö F Ðò òòòFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:Ð üL ÐÌJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPó óÐ Ô$! ÐAttorney€General€and€ReporterÌÌò òELIZABETH€B.€¢MARNEY£ó óÐ ŒÜ$ ÐAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌ¢Cordell£€Hull€Building,€2nd€FloorÌ425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÌNashville,€TN€€37243„0493ÌÌò òLAWRENCE€RAY€WHITLEYó óÐ ö F* ÐDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌò òSALLIE€W.€BROWNó óÐ ®#þ- ÐAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌ113€West€Main€StreetÌSuite€300Ì¢Gallatin£,€TN€€€37066„2803Ð L'œ"1 ÐÒ(ä „¸ @ìì(ÒÌÌÌÌÌÌò òOPINION€FILED:€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ |.Ì)7 ÐÌÌÌAFFIRMED€IN€PART;€REVERSEDÌAND€REMANDED€IN€PARTÌÌÌÌJOE€G.€RILEY,ÌJUDGEó óÐ  ´73A ÐÓÓÑ  Ñà@qq*àò òOPINIONó óˆÐ ° ÐÌà ` àA€Sumner€County€jury€convicted€defendant,€Michael€D.€Keen,€of€two€countsÏof€incest,€Class€C€felonies.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€him€as€a€Range€I€standardÏoffender€to€six€years€incarceration€for€each€conviction,€consecutive.€€On€this€appealÏas€of€right,€defendant€raises€the€following€issues:Ìœà ` àÓÓ1.à8 ¸ àwhether›€the€trial€court€erred€in€allowing€testimony€about€œother›Ð „Ô  Ðsex€crimes€allegedly€committed€by€him;Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌœà ` à2.à8 ¸ àwhether›€the€trial€court€erred€in€allowing€fresh€complaint€à @ì àÐ 6†  Ðtestimony;à h àÐl¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌœà ` à3.à8 ¸ àwhether›€the€trial€court€erred€in€allowing€his€psychiatrist€à @¸ àandÐ è8 Ðpsychiatric€social€worker€to€testify€about€certain€matters;Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌœà ` à4.à8 ¸ àwhether›€his€trial€counsel€was€ineffective;€andÐšê¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌœà ` à5.à8 ¸ àwhether›€his€sentence€is€excessive.Ðf¶¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌÓÓUpon€our€review€of€the€record,€we€REVERSE€AND€REMAND€for€retrial€one€ofÏdefendant's€convictions,€and€AFFIRM€the€other€conviction€and€sentence.ÌœÌÌ›à@ÎÎ+àò òFACTSó óˆÐ b"²! М̛à ` àThe€victim€in€this€case€is€defendant's€stepdaughter,€H.K.ñ˜ñœ×ƒ×ñ˜ññ˜ñ׃×ñ˜ñÝ ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×›€€She€testified€thatÐ &V!% Ðshe€initially€consented€to€have€sex€with€defendant€during€the€spring€of€1994€whenÏshe€was€fourteen€years€old.€€She€claimed€that€they€had€intercourse€œ"[p]robably›Ïanywhere€from€10€to€15"€times.€€She€did€not€specify€when€the€encounters€occurred.€ÏShe€testified€that€she€also€performed€oral€sex€on€defendant,€but€again€did€notÏspecify€when€these€incidents€occurred.€€H.K.€also€testified€that,€after€she€had€sexÏwith€defendant,€he€would€give€her€and€her€siblings€liquor€and€marijuana.€€HerÏdescription€on€direct€examination€about€the€last€time€she€and€defendant€had€sexÏwas€the€following:ÌÓÓà ` àœà ¸ àQ:à8  àDo›€you€remember€approximately€when€was€the€lastÐ 26‚17 Ðœtime€you›€and€Mr.€Keen€had€sex?Ð7h28Ð Ð  Ðœà ` àà ¸ àA:à8  àIt›€was€probably€a€month€and€a€half€before€I€told,€whichÐ ° Ðœwas›€April€œ23rd›€of€[1996].Ð Ð Ð  ÐÌœà ` àà ¸ àQ:à8  àSo›€sometime€during€March€of€that€year?Ðb²Ð Ð  ÐÌœà ` àà ¸ àA:à8  àYes.›€Ð. ~Ð Ð  ÐÌÓÓà ` àH.K.€initially€reported€her€allegations€to€her€mother,€Marilyn€Wood,€in€AprilÏ1996.€€Wood€took€her€children€out€of€the€house€and€when€she€returned,€defendantÏwas€gone.€€Wood€testified€that€defendant€called€her€the€next€day,€"crying,€telling€meÏhe€was€a€sick€man,€that€he€wanted€me€to€stick€by€him€and€help€him€get€help."€€SheÏfurther€testified€that€defendant€admitted€to€her€in€May€1996€that€he€"had€sex€withÏ[H.K.]€for€over€a€year."€€Ìà ` àOn€May€5,€1996,€defendant€was€admitted€into€a€hospital.€€œCalvily›€œEvonne›ÏœAllmon,›€the€psychiatric€social€worker€who€interviewed€him€upon€his€admission,Ïtestified€that,€œ"[a]ccording›€to€[her]€notes€[defendant]€admitted€to€sexual€abuse€withÏhis€stepdaughter."€€Dr.€Robert€A.€Jack,€the€psychiatrist€who€treated€defendant€at€theÏhospital,€testified€that€part€of€the€May€13,€1996,€discharge€plan€was€that€he€attendÏtreatment€at€a€sexual€perpetrators€program.Ìà ` àH.K.'s€allegations€were€not€reported€to€the€police€until€July€31,€1996,€whenÏshe€told€Detective€Susan€Morrow,€"that€her€stepfather€was€having€sexualÏintercourse€with€her€and€she€was€performing€oral€sex€on€him."€€Morrow€also€testifiedÏthat€H.K.€had€reported€defendant€giving€her€alcohol€and€marijuana€after€their€sexualÏencounters.Ìà ` àDefendant€testified€and€admitted€giving€H.K.€alcohol€and€marijuana.€€He€alsoÏadmitted€talking€with€H.K.€about€having€sexual€relations€with€her.€€He€denied,Ïhowever,€that€he€ever€had€sex€with€her.€€He€further€denied€having€told€Allmon€or€Dr.ÏJack€that€he€had€sexual€relations€with€her.€€He€testified€that€Wood€told€him€sheÏwanted€a€divorce€and€that€if€he€"messed€this€up€for€her€.€.€.€[she]€will€say€that€[he]Ïraped€[her]€daughter."€€ÌÌœÌÌÐ ²95; Лà@??#àò òELECTION€OF€OFFENSESˆÐ ° ÐÌà ` àó óAlthough€not€raised€by€defendant€on€this€appeal,€it€is€our€responsibility€toÐ `° Ðreverse€his€conviction€for€incest€under€Count€One€of€€the€indictment€because€theÏstate€failed€to€properly€elect€œan€offense,›€thereby€violating€defendant's€right€to€juryÏunanimity.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Waltonóó,€958€S.W.2d€724,€727„28€(Tenn.€1997).€€The€state'sÐ Ä   Ðomission€constitutes€plain€error.€€òòId.óó;€òòseeóó€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€52(b).€€Ð ”ä  Ðà ` àCount€One€of€the€indictment€provides€as€follows:€€"[Defendant]€heretofore€onÏor€about€the€Spring€of€1994,€.€.€.€did€unlawfully,€knowingly€and€feloniously€engageÏin€sexual€penetration€with€[H.K.],€a€person€he€knew€to€be€his€step„daughter."€€TheÏindictment€thus€covers€a€period€of€several€months€and€further€covers€all€acts€ofÏsexual€penetration,€which€include€both€sexual€intercourse€and€oral€sex.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.Ð ”ä ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€39„13„501(7).€€H.K.€testified€that€she€began€having€sex€with€defendantÏin€the€spring€of€1994,€that€they€had€intercourse€ten€to€fifteen€times,€and€that€theyÏalso€engaged€in€oral€sex.€€No€specific€time€frame€was€established€for€these€multipleÏsex€acts.€€Ìà ` àDuring€closing€argument€the€prosecutor€contended,€œ"ññ[ññtññ]ññhis›€happened€to€her€œÏ.›€.€.€over€a€period€of€.€.€.€two€years,€ending€in€March€of€1996."€€The€prosecutor€furtherÏstated€to€the€jury,€"it's€been€proven€to€you,€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt,€that€thisÏman,€Michael€D.€Keen,€had€sexual€intercourse€with€his€stepdaughter€[H.K.],€on,€òòatÐ ø&H"& Ðleastóó,€two€occasions,€as€in€the€indictment,€beginning€in€the€spring€of€1994€andÐ Ä($( Ðending€in€March€of€1996"€(emphasis€added).€Ìà ` àThe€evidence€in€this€case€suggests€that€defendant€committed€multiple€sexualÏoffenses€against€H.K.€during€the€time€period€covered€in€Count€One€of€theÏindictment.€€Accordingly,€the€trial€court€should€have€required€the€state€to€elect€theÏparticular€offense€for€which€it€was€seeking€a€conviction€in€order€to€ensure€that€theÏjury's€verdict€was€unanimous.€€òòSeeóó€òòWaltonóó,€958€S.W.2d€at€727.€€"This€requirementÐ Œ3Ü.4 Ðis€'fundamental,€immediately€touching€the€constitutional€rights€of€an€œaccused.'"›€€òòId.óóÐ \5¬06 Ðâ â(quoting€œòòBurlison›€v.€Stateóó,€501€S.W.2d€801,€804€(Tenn.€1973)).€€Ð ,7|28 Ðà ` àWith€respect€to€Count€One,€it€appears€that€the€state€was€attempting€toÏâ âconvict€defendant€for€the€first€time€he€had€sex€with€H.K.€€However,€the€proof€was€notÏso€limited.€€Rather,€it€included€testimony€about€multiple€sex€acts,€of€two€differentÏtypes,€with€no€specificity€as€to€events.€€Thus,€because€the€state€was€not€required€toÏelect€a€specific€offense€for€which€it€was€seeking€conviction,€there€is€no€assuranceÏthat€each€juror€relied€upon€the€same€evidence€in€convicting€defendant.€€Accordingly,Ïdefendant's€conviction€of€incest€under€Count€One€of€the€indictment€must€beÏreversed€and€remanded€for€a€new€trial.Ìà ` àDefendant's€conviction€under€Count€Two€of€the€indictment€does€not€sufferÏfrom€the€same€problem.€€That€count€provides:€€"[Defendant]€heretofore€on€or€aboutÏMarch,€1996€.€.€.€did€unlawfully,€knowingly€and€feloniously€engage€in€sexualÏpenetration€with€[H.K.],€a€person€he€knew€to€be€his€step„daughter."€€The€proofÏspecific€to€this€count€was€H.K.'s€testimony€that€the€last€time€she€had€sex€withÏdefendant€was€in€March€1996.€€Thus,€the€jury€did€not€have€the€same€"brimming€bagÏof€offenses,"€òò¢Tidwell£€v.€Stateóó,€922€S.W.2d€497,€501€(Tenn.€1996),€from€which€toÐ Ø( Ðchoose€in€deciding€to€convict€defendant€of€this€offense.€€Ì̛̜à@ïï$àò òEVIDENTIARY€ISSUESó óˆÐ %X $ Ðà@  &àò òA.€òòOther€Crimesó óóóˆÐ à&0"& Ðà ` àDefendant€asserts€that€the€trial€court€should€not€have€allowed€proof€aboutÏsex€crimes€other€than€those€for€which€he€was€indicted.€€The€state€responds€that€thisÏissue€is€waived€because€trial€counsel€did€not€contemporaneously€object.€€The€stateÏis€correct€in€this€regard.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€36(a).Ð .l). Ðà ` àFurthermore,€we€find€this€issue€to€be€without€merit.€€Defendant€is€correct€thatÏthere€is€no€"sex€crimes"€exception€to€the€general€rule€prohibiting€proof€of€anÏâ âaccused's€other€crimes.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€¢Rickman£óó,€876€¢S.W.2d£€824,€829€(Tenn.€œ1994);ñ‘ñÐ „3Ô.4 Ðñ‘ññ’ñÐ „3Ô.4 Ðñ’ñTenn.›€R.€¢Evid£.€404(b).€€However,€proof€of€other€sex€crimes€is€admissible€if€theyÏoccurred€during€the€time€period€covered€by€the€œindictment.׃×Ý ƒ%ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€òòId.ó󛀜€As›€set€forth€above,€œÐ |Ì Ðâ âthe›€state€elicited€testimony€from€H.K.€about€multiple€sex€acts€which€were€implied€asÏoccurring€during€the€several€month€period€covered€by€Count€One€of€the€indictment.€Ïà ` àHad€the€state€elicited€proof€of€sex€acts€occurring€after€the€Spring€of€1994€andÏbefore€the€final€episode,€its€admission€might€have€been€error.òò€€Id.óó€€The€proof€in€thisÐ °  Ðcase€was€not€so€specific.€€However,€to€the€extent€that€the€proof€can€be€soÏconstrued,€we€find€its€admission€to€have€been€harmless€error€with€respect€toÏdefendant's€conviction€under€Count€Two.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Duttonóó,€896€S.W.2d€114,Ð h Ð117€(Tenn.€1995).€€H.K.'s€testimony€about€her€last€sexual€encounter€with€defendantÏand€her€subsequent€decision€to€tell€her€mother€about€what€had€been€happening€wasÏclear€and€unequivocal.€€It€was€corroborated€by€her€mother's€testimony.€€DefendantÏadmitted€enough€of€H.K.'s€allegations€to€justify€the€jury€in€concluding€that€H.K.'sÏtestimony€was€credible€on€the€whole.€€Accordingly,€any€proof€of€sex€acts€that€did€notÏfall€within€the€indicted€period€did€not€"more€probably€than€not"€affect€the€judgmentÏof€conviction€on€Count€Two,€and€defendant€is€not€entitled€to€reversal€of€his€secondÏconviction€on€this€ground.òò€€Id.óó;€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€36(b).€€Ð |!Ì  М̛à@øø(àò òB.€€òòHearsayó óóóˆÐ %h $ Ðà ` àDefendant€next€complains€about€the€trial€court's€admission€of€"freshÏcomplaint"€testimony.€€Specifically,€defendant€contends€that€Detective€MorrowÏshould€not€have€been€allowed€to€testify€about€what€H.K.€told€her.Ìà ` àMorrow€was€the€state's€first€witness€in€its€case„in„chief.€€She€testified,€œòòinter›Ð T,¤', Ðœaliaóó,›€that€H.K.€alleged€"that€her€stepfather€was€having€sexual€intercourse€with€herÐ $.t). Ðand€she€was€performing€oral€sex€on€him;"€that€defendant€was€H.K.'s€uncle€becauseÏhe€was€her€father's€half€or€full€brother;€and€that€defendant€would€buy€H.K.€alcoholÏâ âand€marijuana€after€having€sex€with€him.Ð Œ3Ü.4 Ðà ` àIn€òòState€v.€Kendricksóó,€891€S.W.2d€597,€606€(Tenn.€1994),€the€Court€Ð ° Ðâ âoverruled€the€longstanding€rule€announced€in€òòPhillips€v.€Stateóó,€28€Tenn.€(1€Hum.)Ð |Ì Ðœ246›€(1848),€which€allowed€both€the€fact€and€the€details€of€a€fresh€complaint€to€beÏadmitted€during€the€state's€case„in„chief.€€In€òòKendricksóó,€the€Court€held€that,€in€casesÐ  d Ðinvolving€adult€victims€of€sexual€crimes,€under€the€fresh€complaint€doctrine,€"the€factÏthat€a€complaint€was€made€is€admissible€in€the€state's€case„in„chief€to€rebut€theÏpossible€negative€inference€created€by€the€victim's€silence."€€òòKendricksóó,€891€S.W.2dÐ xÈ  Ðat€606.€€"Once€the€credibility€of€the€victim€has€been€attacked,€the€details€of€theÏcomplaint€are€admissible€to€show€that€the€victim€related€the€same€story€soon€afterÏthe€œincident."€›€œñ“ñòòñ“ñId.ñ“ñóóñ“ñ€€This›€testimony€is€admissible€only€as€corroborative€evidence,€notÐ Ü, Ðas€substantive€evidence.€€òòKendricksóó,€891€S.W.2d€at€606.€€Ð ¬ü Ðà ` àThe€complaint€must€be€timely,€but€need€not€be€contemporaneous€with€theÏevent.€€òòKendricksóó,€891€S.W.2d€at€606.€€This€court€must€consider€theÐ D” Ðreasonableness€of€the€delay€in€the€complaint€in€light€of€all€the€circumstances,Ïincluding€the€reasons€for€the€delay€and€the€age€and€mental€capacity€of€the€victim.€ÏòòId.óó;€òòState€v.€Lewisóó,€803€S.W.2d€260,€264€(Tenn€Crim.€App.€1990).€€Ð ¨ø Ðà ` àThe€òòKendricksóó€holding€is€limited€to€adult€victims.€€òòKendricksóó,€891€S.W.2d€atÐ x!È  Ð606.€€Fresh€complaint€evidence€is€not€admissible€in€cases€with€a€child€victim.€€òòStateÐ D#”" Ðv.€¢Livingston£óó,€907€S.W.2d€392,€394„95€(Tenn.€1995).Ð %` $ Ðà ` àIn€the€context€of€sex€crimes,€a€"child"€is€defined€as€under€thirteen€years€old.€ÏòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€œAnn.€ðððð›€39„13„504(a)(4)€and€39„13„522(a).€€H.K.€testified€that€herÐ ¨(ø#( Ðdate€of€birth€is€February€11,€1980.€€The€indictment€covers€the€time€period€"SpringÏof€1994"€and€"March,€1996."€€Therefore,€H.K.€was€fourteen€years€old€in€the€springÏof€1994,€an€"adult"€for€purposes€of€determining€the€admissibility€of€fresh€complaintÏtestimony.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€¢Schuller£óó,€975€S.W.2d€313,€321€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).€Ð Ü/,+0 ÐHowever,€she€did€not€make€her€statement€to€Morrow€until€July€31,€1996.€€This€wasÏat€least€four€months€after€the€last€alleged€incident€took€place,€more€than€threeÏmonths€after€H.K.€told€her€mother.€€Under€the€circumstances€of€this€case,€we€holdÏthat€H.K.'s€report€to€Morrow€was€not€sufficiently€timely€to€qualify€as€fresh€complaint.€ÏAccordingly,€the€trial€court€erred€in€admitting€this€evidence.€€However,€given€H.K.'sÐ Ü8,4: Ðtestimony€and€the€remaining€proof€in€the€record,€we€also€hold€that€the€error€wasÏharmless.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Speckóó,€944€S.W.2d€598,€602€(Tenn.€1997);€Tenn.€R.€App.Ð |Ì ÐP.€36(b).€€Therefore,€this€issue€is€without€merit.̛̜à@ªª!àò òC.€€òòPsychiatric€Privilegeó óóóˆÐ ä 4 Ðà ` àIn€his€next€issue,€defendant€contends€the€trial€court€committed€plain€error€inÏadmitting€Dr.€Jack's€and€Allmon's€testimony€about€what€he€told€them€while€at€theÏhospital.€€Defendant€is€correct€that€patient„psychiatrist€communications€areÏprivileged.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€24„1„207.׃×Ý ƒ%ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€However,€he€concedes€that€thisÐ  p Ðissue€is€waived€because€he€did€not€raise€this€issue€in€his€motion€for€new€trial.€€òòSeeóóÐ ð@ ÐTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3(e).€€Hence,€his€reliance€is€on€"plain€error."Ìœà ` àAn›€error€which€has€affected€the€substantial€right€of€a€defendant€may€beÏnoticed€at€any€time€in€the€discretion€of€the€appellate€court€where€necessary€to€doÏsubstantial€justice.€€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€52(b).€€ð ðPlain€errorðð€or€ð ðfundamental€errorðð€isÏrecognized€under€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€52(b).€€òòState€v.€Stephensonóó,€878€S.W.2d€530,Ð ð@ Ð553„54€(Tenn.€1994);€òòState€v.€Adkissonóó,€899€S.W.2d€626,€639€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð ¼  Ð1994).€€Plain€error€is€an€egregious€error€that€strikes€at€the€ð ðfairness,€integrity€orÏpublic€reputation€of€judicial€proceedings.ðð€€òòUnited€States€v.€Rodriguezóó,€882€F.2dÐ T#¤" Ð1059,€1064€(6th€Cir.€1989);€òòState€v.€Adkissonóó,€899€S.W.2d€at€639„40.€€Some€errorsÐ  %p $ Ðare€so€fundamental€and€pervasive€that€they€require€reversal€without€regard€to€theÏfacts€or€circumstances€of€the€particular€case.€€òòDelaware€v.€Van€Arsdallóó,€475€U.S.Ð ¸($( Ð673€(1986).Ìà ` àIn€determining€whether€the€admission€of€Dr.€Jack's€and€Allmon's€testimonyÏconstitutes€plain€error,€we€must€consider€whether€each€of€the€following€requirementsÏis€met:ÌÓÓœà ` à1.›à8 ¸ àthe€record€clearly€establishes€what€happened€in€the€trial€court;д1-2¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÐ š2ê-3 Ðœà ` à2.›à8 ¸ àa€clear€and€unequivocal€rule€of€law€was€breached;а¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌœà ` à3.›à8 ¸ àa€substantial€right€of€defendant's€was€adversely€affected;Ð|̸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌœà ` à4.›à8 ¸ àdefendant€did€not€waive€the€issue€for€tactical€reasons;€andÐH˜¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌœà ` à5.›à8 ¸ àconsideration€of€the€error€is€'necessary€to€do€substantialÐ  d Ðœjustice.ðð›Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌÓÓòòAdkissonóó,€899€S.W.2d€at€641„42€(citations€omitted).Ð Æ   Ðà ` àIn€this€case,€the€record€clearly€establishes€the€admission€of€the€privilegedÏcommunications.€€Moreover,€a€clear€and€unequivocal€rule€of€law€„„€the€patient„¼psychiatrist€privilege€„„€was€breached.׃×Ý ƒ%ÃÝòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€state€concedes€that€the€issue€was€notÐ *z  Ðwaived€for€tactical€reasons.€€Thus,€we€must€determine€whether€the€error€adverselyÏaffected€one€of€defendant's€substantial€rights€and,€if€so,€whether€consideration€ofÏthe€error€is€necessary€to€do€substantial€justice.Ìà ` àDr.€Jack's€testimony€included€the€following€privileged€communications:ÌÓÓà ` àœà ¸ à1.›à8  àdefendant€reported€that€"he€had€propositioned€one€ofÐ &v Ðhis€stepdaughters,€and€she€had€reported€this€to€herÏmother;"€andÐ Ð Ð  ÐÌà ` àœà ¸ à2.›à8  àpart€of€defendant's€discharge€plan€was€that€he€attend€aÐ ¾ Ðsexual€perpetrators€program.Ð Ð Ð  ÐÌà ` àAllmonððs€testimony€included€the€following€privileged€communications:ÌÌà ` àœà ¸ à1.›à8  àdefendant€reported€"that€his€wife€took€the€children,€twoÐ <#Œ" Ðstepdaughters,€ages€15€and€16,€and€their€son,€and€leftÏœ.›€.€.€.€€This€followed€the€oldest€daughter€telling€herÏmother€that€[he]€had€propositioned€her;"€Ð Ð Ð  ÐÌà ` àœà ¸ à2.›à8  àhe€"admitted€to€sexual€abuse€with€his€stepdaughter;"€Ðº' #'Ð Ð  ÐÌà ` àœà ¸ à3.›à8  àhe€informed€her€that€he€didn't€know€if€he€was€"evil€orÐ †)Ö$) Ðsick;"€andÐ Ð Ð  ÐÌà ` àœà ¸ à4.›à8  àhe€was€open€to€referral€to€the€sexual€perpetratorsÐ 8,ˆ', Ðœprogram.›Ð Ð Ð  ÐÌÓÓIn€light€of€defendant's€own€admissions€on€the€stand€about€discussing€with€the€victimÏâ âtheir€having€sexual€relations,€and€in€light€of€the€remaining€proof€in€the€record,€weÐ ¶0,1 Ðhold€that€the€admission€of€this€testimony,€while€error,€does€not€rise€to€the€level€ofÏplain€error€requiring€reversal.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.Ìâ âà ` àIn€a€related€issue,€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€allowingÏAllmon€to€testify€that€defendant€€told€her€he€sexually€abused€his€stepdaughter.€€HeÏargues€it€was€not€relevant€or,€alternatively,€any€relevance€was€substantiallyÏoutweighed€by€the€danger€of€unfair€prejudice,€confusion€of€the€issues,€or€misleadingÏthe€jury.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€¢Evid£.€402,€403.€€Allmon€was€unable€to€clarify€œthe›€time€periodÐ xÈ  Ðto€which€defendant€referred,€making€the€testimony€œñ”ñquestñ”ññ•ññ”ñoñ”ññ•ññ–ñionable€ñ–ññ—ñvirtually›€useless›€ñ—ñas›€proof€of€theÏparticular€crimes€with€which€he€was€charged.€€Moreover,€the€record€establishes€thatÏdefendant€had€two€stepdaughters.€€Allmon€did€not€identify€which€girl€defendantÏallegedly€abused.€€Finally,€Allmon€did€not€specify€what€conduct€was€meant€byÏ"sexual€abuse."€€Regardless,€we€find€that€its€admission€did€not€so€prejudiceÏdefendant€as€to€require€reversal.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.Ì̛̜à@F F àò òINEFFECTIVE€ASSISTANCE€OF€COUNSELó óˆÐ ¨ø М̛à ` àIn€conjunction€with€the€foregoing€issues,€defendant€complains€that€his€trialÏcounsel€was€ineffective.€€This€Court€reviews€a€claim€of€ineffective€assistance€ofÏcounsel€under€the€standards€of€òòBaxter€v.€Roseóó,€523€S.W.2d€930€(Tenn.€1975),€andÐ ä&4"& ÐòòStrickland€v.€Washingtonóó,€466€U.S.€668,€104€S.Ct.€2052,€80€L.Ed.2d€674€(1984).Ð °($( ÐDefendant€has€the€burden€to€prove€that€(1)€the€attorneyððs€performance€wasÏdeficient,€and€(2)€the€deficient€performance€resulted€in€prejudice€to€the€defendantÏso€as€to€deprive€him€of€a€fair€trial.€€òòStrickland€v.€Washingtonóó,€466€U.S.€at€687,€104Ð .d). ÐS.Ct.€at€2064;€òòGoad€v.€Stateóó,€938€S.W.2d€363,€369€(Tenn.€1996);€òòOverton€v.€Stateóó,Ð à/0+0 Ð874€S.W.2d€6,€11€(Tenn.€1994);€òòButler€v.€Stateóó,€789€S.W.2d€898,€899€(Tenn.€1990).Ð ¬1ü,2 Ðà ` àBecause€we€find€that€none€of€the€errors€complained€of€resulted€in€prejudiceÏwhich€deprived€defendant€of€a€fair€trial,€this€issue€has€no€merit.€€Defendant'sÏâ âcontention€that€all€of€the€trial€court's€errors,€combined€with€trial€counsel's€allegedÐ 7`28 Ðmistakes,€prejudiced€the€judicial€process€is€likewise€without€merit.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.Ð ° ÐApp.€P.€36(b).€€Ìâ âœñ™ñÌñ™ñ›œñšñÌñšñÌ›à@ˆˆ(àò òSENTENCINGˆÐ ä 4 Ðœó óÌ›à ` àFinally,€defendant€contends€that€his€sentence€on€each€conviction€isÏexcessive,€and€service€of€those€sentences€should€not€be€consecutive.€€DefendantÏwas€convicted€of€two€Class€C€felonies.€€The€range€of€sentence€for€these€felonies€forÏa€standard€offender€is€three€to€six€years.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„112(a)(3).€€TheÏtrial€court€enhanced€each€of€defendant's€sentences€to€the€maximum€of€six€years€onÏthe€basis€of€one€enhancement€factor:€€he€had€a€previous€history€of€criminalÏconvictions€in€addition€to€those€necessary€to€establish€the€range.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ïðð€40„35„114(1).€€The€trial€court€made€a€specific€finding€of€no€mitigating€factors.€ÏDefendant€contends€that€the€court€should€have€applied€as€mitigating€factors€that€hisÏconduct€neither€caused€nor€threatened€serious€bodily€injury,€and€that€heÏacknowledged€his€guilt€and€expressed€remorse.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113€(1)Ïand€(13).€€The€State€disagrees€and€further€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€inÏrefusing€to€apply€two€additional€enhancement€factors:€€the€offenses€were€committedÏto€gratify€his€desire€for€pleasure€and€excitement;€and€he€abused€a€position€of€privateÏtrust.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(7)€and€(15).€€Ìà ` àThis€Courtððs€review€of€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€is€òòde€novoóó€withÐ |*Ì%* Ða€presumption€of€correctness.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€This€presumptionÏis€conditioned€upon€an€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€judgeÏconsidered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.€ÏòòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€If€the€trial€court€fails€to€complyÐ °1-2 Ðwith€the€statutory€directives,€there€is€no€presumption€of€correctness€and€our€reviewÏis€òòde€novoóó.€€òòState€v.€Pooleóó,€945€S.W.2d€93,€96€(Tenn.€1997).Ð H5˜06 Ðà ` àWe€turn€first€to€the€application€of€mitigating€and€enhancement€factors.€€WeÏagree€with€the€state€that€the€enhancement€factor€for€abuse€of€a€private€trust€wasÐ ä844: Ðapplicable€in€this€case,€and€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€refusing€to€apply€it.€ÏDefendant€was€H.K.'s€stepfather.€€Contrary€to€defendant's€argument,€abuse€of€aÏprivate€trust€is€not€an€essential€element€of€the€crime€of€incest.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€RobertÐ H˜ ÐL.€Milleróó,€C.C.A.€No.€03C01„9502„CR„00037,€Blount€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€filedÐ  h ÐSeptember€25,€1997,€at€Knoxville).€€Ìà ` àWe€further€agree€with€the€state€that€the€defendant€committed€these€acts€toÏgratify€his€desire€for€pleasure€and€excitement.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð |Ì  Ð114(7).€€Again,€this€is€not€an€essential€element€of€incest.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Billy€JoeÐ Lœ  ТPruitt£óó,€C.C.A.€No.€¢01C01£„9304„CR„00123,€Wilson€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€filedÐ l ÐMarch€31,€1994,€at€Nashville).€€Accordingly,€even€if€defendant€is€correct€that€the€trialÏcourt€should€have€applied€two€mitigating€factors,€we€find€that€the€number€andÏseverity€of€the€applicable€enhancement€factors€is€sufficient€to€support€the€maximumÏsentence€within€the€range.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.Ìà ` àBecause€we€have€reversed€defendant's€conviction€under€Count€One€of€theÏindictment,€he€is€entitled€to€a€new€trial€on€that€charge€and,€if€convicted,€a€newÏsentencing€hearing.€€The€issue€of€consecutive€sentences€is,€therefore,€moot€and€weÏdecline€to€address€it.Ì̛̜à@xx(àò òCONCLUSIONó óˆÐ à&0"& М̛à ` àFor€the€reasons€set€forth€above,€defendant's€conviction€of€incest€under€ÏCount€One€of€the€indictment€is€reversed,€and€that€charge€is€remanded€for€a€newÏtrial.€€In€all€other€respects,€the€judgment€below€is€affirmed.ÌÓÓ̜Р Î0,1 ÐÌÌÌÌÌ›à€èè/(#à____________________________ˆÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGEó óÐ  d ÐÌÌÌœò òCONCUR:›Ð ²   ÐÌœó óÌÌÌ______________________________ò ò›Ð <Œ  ÐDAVID€H.€WELLES,€JUDGEÌÌÌœó óÌÌ______________________________ò ò›Ð ² ÐJOHN€EVERETT€WILLIAMS,€œJUDGEó ó›