WPC ?< JH̺̠]2zwiu0xA\14IlzgqK``e--ՎjP@> c~^dLD+Hn.tfܴeC/4M5g⢏aT+ A:|`yUN)7 QԠAk{s]/e,hrZ|`TOUxsʉ_*ɠ%E ܉ϼsԓ0G xDYZyFDs \w)w5!N( ݲ ]F|⻡2Q XAFoIwsR.-Aӕu#D^{}}䐓N=j1.cdKL"۵$mdj"H0'y p.Mo"N מ [")^P"Uw_4UH2J# F UNQ % 0( U: b 0 U : 0 U: w@ 4 - < U:gU:MMM B D3 0D AO#rr 0D8 D/| BHP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLh(hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($,|AZ"Arial Regular- -(AG$XXXX XX  0  ,  AZ"Arial Regular(*2h$ !   XXXX &&X X   `   0  ,  AZ"Arial Regular VUEEDӀuM%X 3|x   h$ XXXX &&X X   `   1    TheStatearguesthattheStatementofEvidencefiledbyDefendantfollowinghis `  NoticeofAppealisinsufficientunderTennesseeRuleofAppellateProcedure24(c).WefindthattheStatementwasfiledwiththetrialcourtwithinthe90dayperiodasrequired.DefendanthanddeliveredacopyoftheStatementtotheState.NoobjectionsbytheStateappearintherecord;andpursuanttoTennesseeRuleofAppellateProcedure24(f),theStatementbecamefinaluponinactionbythetrialcourt. ` Although,astheStateargues,theStatementhasnotbeenspecifically certifiedbyDefendantorDefendantscounsel,wefind(1)thatDefendanthassubstantiallycompliedwiththerequirementsofRule24,and(2)thattheproperplacefortheStatesobjectionswasinthetrialcourt,asthetrialcourtwastheproperarbiterofanyfactualdisputesbetweentheStateandDefendant.WeconsidertheStatementofEvidenceinlieuofatranscriptoftheevidence.  Q^$ XnXXX & &X Xn   `   2    Defendantwasconvictedtwiceforburglary,oncein1973andoncein1985.   Q^$X^XXX& &X X^   `   1    TheStatearguesthattheStatementofEvidencefiledbyDefendantfollowinghis `  NoticeofAppealisinsufficientunderTennesseeRuleofAppellateProcedure24(c).WefindthattheStatementwasfiledwiththetrialcourtwithinthe90dayperiodasrequired.DefendanthanddeliveredacopyoftheStatementtotheState.NoobjectionsbytheStateappearintherecord;andpursuanttoTennesseeRuleofAppellateProcedure24(f),theStatementbecamefinaluponinactionbythetrialcourt. ` Although,astheStateargues,theStatementhasnotbeenspecifically certifiedbyDefendantorDefendantscounsel,wefind(1)thatDefendanthassubstantiallycompliedwiththerequirementsofRule24,and(2)thattheproperplacefortheStatesobjectionswastheintrialcourt,asthetrialcourtwastheproperarbiterofanyfactualdisputesbetweentheStateandDefendant.WeconsidertheStatementofEvidenceinlieuofatranscriptoftheevidence.,  AZ"Arial Regular   Q^$ XnXXX & &X Xn   `   3    Defendanthasbeenconvictedtwicefordrivingonarevokedorsuspendedlicense, `  onceforpossessionofstolenproperty,onceforpossessionofdrugparaphernalia,oncefordisorderlyconduct,onceforresistingastopandfrisk,twicefortrafficoffenses,onceforcriminaltrespass,onceforrecklessendangerment,onceforpublicintoxication,twiceforshoplifting,threetimesforpossessionofdrugs,twicefordisturbingthepeace,andonceforaweaponsoffense. X3\ XXX  XX3\   Ad FILEDX3\ X   April20,1999CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerkdAM ,cAZ"Arial Regular d 'dxd(3$ !  -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd !  ` TXXTTR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7XXdd7      r*<,(j 8` `@Ef ` 8ttxP,`  rߛINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE `  ATNASHVILLEMARCHSESSION,1999  STATEOFTENNESSEE,  )  C.C.A.NO.01C019805CR00229 `  `     h   )  `  ` Appellee,   h   ) `   `     h   ) `     h   )  DAVIDSONCOUNTY `  VS. `     h   )   `   `     h   )  HON.SETHNORMAN,  `   CLINTONE.KEY,  h   )  JUDGE  `  `     h   )  `  ` Appellant.   h   )  (MisdemeanorSentencing)  `    ONAPPEALFROMTHEJUDGMENTOFTHECRIMINALCOURTOFDAVIDSONCOUNTY  FORTHEAPPELLANT: h     FORTHEAPPELLEE: 0  ̜MARYGRIFFIN   h     JOHNKNOXWALKUP  " AssistantPublicDefender    AttorneyGeneralandReporter # 1202StahlmanBuildingNashville,TN37201 h     CLINTONJ.MORGAN %  `     h     AssistantAttorneyGeneral `     h     425FifthAvenueNorth `     h     Nashville,TN37243̜ `     h     VICTORS.JOHNSON `     h     DistrictAttorneyGeneral `     h     PAMELAANDERSON `     h     AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral `     h     WashingtonSquare,Suite500 `     h     Nashville,TN372011649OPINIONFILED________________________AFFIRMEDDAVIDH.WELLES,JUDGE  5 ,-   jQ 7 dXXd7OPINION jQ `     ` TheDefendant,ClintonE.Key,appealshissentencesofthirtydaysfordisorderlyconduct;sixmonthsforresistingarrest;thirtydaysforcriminaltrespass;andelevenmonths,twentyninedaysforassault.Followingajurytrial,thetrialcourtorderedDefendanttoservethesentencesconsecutivelyintheϜcountyjail,withreleaseeligibilityatseventyfivepercent.Defendantarguesthatthetrialcourterredbyimposingthemaximumsentenceoneachconvictionandbyorderingthesentencesservedconsecutively. `  Althoughtherecorddoesnotcontainatranscriptoftheevidence > presentedtothejuryduringthetrial,theDefendantsubmittedastatementoftheevidence.# # G     1      כThesecrimesweretheresultoftwoseparateconfrontationswith !N policeofficers"oneinSeptemberof1996andtheotherinFebruaryof1997.Onbothoccasions,theDefendantapparentlyresistedtheeffortsofpoliceofficerstotakehimintocustody. ` Defendant,amultiplemisdemeanant,isnotentitledtothepresumptiveminimumsentence.Statev.Baker,966S.W.2d429,434(Tenn.Crim.App. -~$$ 1997);Statev.Combs,945S.W.2d770,774(Tenn.Crim.App.1996);Statev. `  Boyd,925S.W.2d237,244(Tenn.Crim.App.1995);Statev.Seaton,914 h  S.W.2d129,133(Tenn.Crim.App.1995);Statev.Williams,914S.W.2d940, p  949(Tenn.Crim.App.1995);Statev.Creasy,885S.W.2d829,832(Tenn.Crim. x App.1994). ` Inmisdemeanorsentencing,thetrialcourtretainstheauthoritytoplacethedefendantonprobationeitherimmediatelyorafteratimeofperiodicorcontinuousconfinement.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035302(e).Misdemeanorsentencingisdesignedtoprovidethetrialcourtwithcontinuingjurisdictionandagreatdealofflexibility.Furthermore,oursupremecourtrecentlystatedinState P v.Troutman,979S.W.2d271(Tenn.1998),thatthetrialcourtsfindingsonthe X issueofincarcerationneednotappearintherecord:8 ` [W]hilethebetterpracticeistomakefindingsontherecordwhenfixingapercentageofadefendantssentencetobeservedinincarceration,atrialcourtneedonlyconsidertheprinciplesofsentencingandenhancementandmitigatingfactorsinordertocomplywiththelegislativemandatesofthemisdemeanorsentencingstatute. ` !` ! Id.at274. *!!  ` Withrespecttoconsecutivesentencing,TennesseeCodeAnnotated4035115providesthatthetrialcourtmayordermultiplesentencestorunconsecutivelyifthe defendantisanoffenderwhoserecordofcriminalactivityisextensive.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035115(b)(2).  7--  ` AttheDefendantssentencinghearing,theonlyprofferedmitigatingproof relevanttosentencingwasDefendantstestimonythathehas turnedoveranewleafbycommittingmisdemeanorsratherthan grandfelonies.ThetrialcourtcommentedonitsconsiderationofDefendantspriorrecordofcriminalactivitycontainedinthepresentencereport,whichincludestwofelonyconvictions, G  2         nineteenmisdemeanorconvictions,j G  3      ׀andarrestsfortwentyeightadditional (  countsnotresultinginaconvictions.Thereportalsoreflectsthatapriorsentenceofprobationforhisfirstburglarywasrevoked.Atthesentencinghearing,theDefendantdemonstratedneitherremorsenorpotentialforrehabilitation,andheinfactsuggestedthepoliceofficersshouldbereprimandedforbringingthechargesagainsthim. ` WefindtheforegoingevidencesufficienttosupportboththelengthandmannerofserviceofDefendantssentencesfordisorderlyconduct,resistingarrest,criminaltrespass,andassault.Weaffirmthesentencesorderedbythetrialcourt. `     h    `     h   ____________________________________ `     h   DAVIDH.WELLES,JUDGE  0'' CONCUR:___________________________________JOEG.RILEY,JUDGE___________________________________JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,JUDGE