ÿWPC …# VUNa %¯ 0(µw@Ý4 1 @ 0JH 0T’ 0^æ 0hD 0r¬ 0| 0†š 0 1u° 0d% U>‰ U*Ç B)ñ DC AM]êª B”v~±vÓ/ D3 0@5 AOuÆÄ 0DŠ D/Î Bý˜HP LaserJet 4M PlusHPPCL5MS,ð,,,,,ð0nLhÎ(uHš Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡ £E U!£"#P$>e%Ó€}€Ð"Vf>ff\3|x02 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d!!!!7Border 1dd€-"Cþÿ << Gÿÿ àÝ ƒ!ÝÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÔ€ ÔÔ€ ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€ XÔÌÌò òMarch€24,€1998ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó dPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿáùEG(üHHØ(d'`Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  ion-F Geneva ÒÒ  ion-F Geneva Ò%%%%'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÒ ¼ ÒÒ ° ÒÙ€€ÙÓ  ÓÑ\R AØ'\ÑÔ€ Ôò ò›œßR€#$"A1-j|` Å `€€@ÿRß›Þ ÞÌIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌAT€KNOXVILLEÌÌMARCH€1998€SESSIONÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà à)à àC.C.A.€03C01„9609„CR„00350Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)€à àANDERSON€COUNTYÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àAppellant,à àà àà à)à àHon.€James€B.€Scott,ÏJudgeÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìvs.à àà àà àà àà àà à)à à(DRIVING€UNDER€THE€à àà àà àà àà àà à€€€à à)à àÏINFLUENCE)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àNos.€95CR063€&Ï95CR0284ÌMICHAEL€D.€LEACH,à àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àAppellee.à àà àà à)ÌÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à àà àà àà àòòFOR€THEÏAPPELLEEóó:ÌÌCHARLES€W.€BURSONà àà àà àà àMICHAEL€G.ÏHATMAKERÌAttorney€General€&€Reporterà àà àà àP.O.€Box€417,€571ÏMain€StreetÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àJacksboro,€TN€37757ÌSANDY€R.€COPOUSÌAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌ450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌNashville,€TN€37243ÌÌJAMES€N.€RAMSEYÌDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌJAN€HICKSÌAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌ127€Anderson€County€CourthouseÌClinton,€TN€37716Ìà àà àà àà àÌÌOPINION€FILED:_______________ÌÌÌREVERSED€AND€REMANDEDÌÌÌÌCORNELIA€A.€CLARKÌSpecial€JudgeÌÌó óÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓòòOPINIONÌÌÓ  ÓÓÓóóà àThe€State€of€Tennessee€appeals€from€the€action€of€the€AndersonÏCounty€Criminal€Court€dismissing€the€indictment€against€the€appellee€forÏdriving€under€the€influence€of€an€intoxicant.€€The€trial€court€held€thatÏdefendantððs€prosecution€violated€his€right€against€double€jeopardy.€€TheÏjudgment€of€the€trial€court€is€reversed.Ìà àThe€procedural€history€of€this€case€is€complicated.€€On€October€2,€1994,€Ïpursuant€to€a€valid€warrantless€arrest,€€the€defendant€Michael€D.€Leach€wasÏcharged€with€driving€under€the€Influence€of€an€Intoxicant.€€The€arresting€officerÏused€a€citation€form€identifying€the€defendant,€the€vehicle,€the€date€and€time€ofÏthe€offense,€€the€name€of€the€offense,€and€the€fact€that€defendant€registered€aÏblood€alcohol€level€of€.20.€€The€citation€did€not€set€out€any€narrative€facts€ofÏthe€offense.€It€was€apparently€issued€in€violation€of€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40„7„118.€€Ìà àOn€January€3,€1995,€the€arresting€officer€filed€an€Affidavit€of€ComplaintÏin€the€Anderson€County€General€Sessions€Court.€€That€affidavit€set€forth€theÏdate€of€the€offense,€the€charge€for€which€the€defendant€was€arrested,€theÏdefendantððs€blood€alcohol€level,€and€a€narrative€of€the€facts€underlying€theÏarrest.€€The€affidavit€did€not€state€the€name€of€the€defendant,€but€did€contain€aÏnotation€to€ð ðsee€cit,ðð€apparently€referring€to€the€citation€issued€on€the€night€ofÏthe€arrest.€€Ìà àThe€defendant€waived€his€right€to€trial€by€jury,€entered€a€plea€of€notÏguilty,€and€commenced€the€trial€of€his€case€in€general€sessions€court.€€ByÏagreement€with€the€State,€defendant€waived€the€right€to€a€òòde€novoóó€appeal€onÏthe€merits,€but€reserved€the€right€to€appeal€any€technical€defects.€€After€the€firstÏwitness€was€sworn€the€defendant€filed€a€motion€to€dismiss€based€on€theÏinsufficiency€of€the€charging€instrument.€€The€€judge€denied€the€motion,€heardÏthe€proof€in€the€case,€and€found€the€defendant€guilty€of€driving€under€theÏinfluence€of€an€intoxicant.€€The€defendant€appealed€his€case€to€the€AndersonÏCounty€Criminal€Court.ÌÓ  Óà à2ÌÓ  Óà àOn€June€23,€1995,€the€trial€court€conducted€a€òòde€novoóó€hearing€on€theÏÑ X Ñsufficiency€of€the€charging€instrument.€€The€trial€court€ruled€that€the€citation€didÏnot€constitute€a€legal€charging€instrument.€€The€court€further€found€that€theÏAffidavit€of€Complaint,€which€constituted€the€charging€instrument,€wasÏinsufficient€because€it€did€not€contain€the€name€of€the€defendant.€€On€July€11,Ï1995,€the€trial€court€entered€an€order€dismissing€the€charge€against€theÏdefendant.€€No€appeal€was€taken€from€that€decision.€€Ìà àOn€August€1,€1995,€the€State€submitted€the€case€to€the€grand€jury,€andÏthe€grand€jury€returned€the€indictment€in€this€case€charging€the€defendant€withÏdriving€under€the€influence€of€an€intoxicant.€€The€defendant€again€filed€aÏmotion€to€dismiss,€asserting€that€prosecution€was€barred€based€on€principlesÏof€double€jeopardy.€€He€claimed€that€jeopardy€initially€attached€in€generalÏsessions€court.€€A€hearing€was€conducted€July€15,€1996€and€the€trial€courtÏagreed€with€his€position€and€dismissed€the€indictment€in€this€case.Ìà àThe€law€is€well€settled€that€jeopardy€generally€attaches€in€a€court€ofÏcompetent€jurisdiction€when€the€first€witness€in€a€bench€trial€is€sworn.€€òòState€v.ÏDanielsóó,€531€S.W.€2d€795€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1975).€€However,€no€validÏprosecution€can€occur€if€the€charging€instrument€is€insufficient.€€òòState€v.ÏMorganóó,€598€S.W.€2d€796€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1979).€€Therefore,€if€a€chargingÏinstrument€is€insufficient,€€no€offense€has€been€charged€and€any€subsequentÏproceedings€on€the€instrument€are€a€nullity.€€òòState€v.€Perkinsonóó,€867€S.W.€2dÏ1,€6€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1992).€€Ìà àOur€decision€in€this€case€is€governed€by€òòState€v.€Campbellóó,€641€S.W.Ï2d€890€(Tenn.€1982).€€In€that€case€the€defendant€was€convicted€in€generalÏsessions€court€of€the€offense€of€driving€while€intoxicated.€€On€appeal€to€theÏCriminal€Court,€the€defendant€filed€a€motion€to€dismiss€on€the€grounds€that€theÏarrest€warrant€was€void€because€it€lacked€a€magistrateððs€signature.€€The€trialÏcourt€agreed.€€The€State€then€obtained€a€grand€jury€presentment€on€the€sameÏcharge.€€The€defendant€filed€a€motion€to€dismiss€the€presentment€on€double€ÌÌÓ  Ó3ÌÓ  Ójeopardy€grounds.€€The€trial€court€agreed€and€dismissed€the€presentment.€ÍThis€court€affirmed€the€decision€of€the€trial€court.€€The€Supreme€CourtÏreversed,€holding€that€since€the€initial€warrant€was€void,€all€the€proceedingsÏand€the€judgment€that€followed€were€invalid.€€The€Court€concluded€that€ð ðin€aÏcase€where€the€defendant€seeks€and€obtains€the€invalidation€of€the€judgmentÏand€dismissal€is€based€on€technical€or€procedural€grounds,€there€is€no€formerÏjeopardy€problem€in€retrial.ðð€€€òòCampbellóó,€641€S.W.€2d€at€893.à àTheÏdecision€in€òòCampbellóó€controls€this€case.€€Neither€party€contends€that€the€initialÏcharging€instrument€was€valid.€€Because€that€instrument€was€void,€allÏproceedings€instituted€under€it€were€invalid.€€Jeopardy€has€not€attached€in€thisÏcase,€and€the€subsequent€indictment€is€valid.€€Ìà àFor€the€reasons€set€forth€above,€we€reverse€the€decision€of€the€trialÏcourt.€€The€case€is€remanded€for€further€proceedings€consistent€with€thisÏopinion.ÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà à_____________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àCORNELIA€A.€CLARKÌà àà àà àà àà àà àSPECIAL€JUDGEÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ____________________________ÌJOHN€H.€PEAYÌJUDGEÌÌÌ____________________________ÌPAUL€G.€SUMMERSÌJUDGEÌÌ€€ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÓ  Ó4ÌÌÌÌÌÌ