WPC c$3)b ܍l$aI$3=20ꔵCO1Q9y[EÄ/.Fa5+IS5$WMiP;{z4M\&G7-sBd;VzYSE;VϨOBo5BM_cD@g$xUt(V@ >KD4LX,FVA,Eg}sŹp}2V @kmv#FK}TN%_ ,R/D1G%0P`Wa=t(Tjc`~7T*`ĢNCp&)5~pq%#2D e%-[`8y>EBjs?mCxYpI:3CyA@z4w)y$h/MagK*maU6N %n 0eG#!4 U:  w# N' ^ ) 5 m7 N V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V AQ 9 0 0 0D D3E Bx'`Boldface PSX3|n'`Boldface PSXn P[ʘ9XP(=]$  44XX:HP LaserJet 8000 DN PS0tpO',rAZ"Arial RegularVz[' U   ["  4|4XX:  4x^444|44x^  _  Ad FILEDX-X  October27,1999Cecil_Crowson_,Jr.AppellateCourt_ClerkdA _Z[\]_C<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(Y3$ ]!  4|4XX:  (Y3$ ]!  4|4XX:  ($$   1  ````'dxd d ]!  4|4XX:  _TR[A'Legal3'A' Legal3'TX4x^444|C44x^  _vY_@0,j:`  `@E` ttxR ov__@ D X-XCINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @rr-DATNASHVILLEo[X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?AXoKERRYD.LOVETT, h    D )  \  `     h    D ) p C.C.A.NO.01C019907CC00249 3   ` Appellant,   h    D ) p (No.1203012254Below)    `     h    D ) VS. `     h    D ) p CHEATHAMCOUNTY h   `     h    D ) p TheHon.RobertE.Burch ?   STATEOFTENNESSEE,0 h    D ) f h%h%  `     h    D ) p (DismissalofPetitionforJailCredits)   =   ` Appellee.    h    D )     `     h    D ) p AFFIRMEDPURSUANTTORULE20   @kk/DORDER   p  t: `  ThismatterisbeforetheCourtuponthestatesmotionrequestingthatthejudgmentintheabovestyledcausebeaffirmedpursuanttoRule20,TennesseeCourtofCriminalAppealsRules.Theappellantopposesthemotion.Uponreviewingtherecord,theappellantsbrief,thestatesmotion,andtheappellantsreply,wefindthatitisanappropriatematterforaffirmanceunderRule20. `  Fromtherecord,itappearsthattheappellantfiledamotiontoreceivejailcreditsonJanuary21,1999.Thereafter,onJune15,1999,thetrialcourtdismissedthemotionforlackofjurisdiction.Later,onAugust18,1999,thetrialcourtenteredanordergivingtheappellantcreditfortimeservedinjailpriortoandafterthejudgmentswereentered.Onappeal,thepetitionercontendsthatheisentitledto twoforonecreditsand behavioralcredits.SeeT.C.A.412123and4121236(e). &!)  `  Asageneralrule,onceaprisonerisinthecustodyoftheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrection,theproperavenuebywhichtoaddresssentencereductioncredits,includingpretrialjailcredits,isthroughtheAdministrativeProceduresAct.See '-w(1 T.C.A.45101,etseq.seealso,RussellKirbyv.State,No.03C01-9309-CR-00303, .*3 (Tenn.Crim.App.,atKnoxville,Aug.22,1994).ThisCourthasrecognizedthatwhereboth m0+5 thestateandthepetitionerareinagreementthatthepetitionerisentitledtothecredits,thetrialcourtsordergrantingthecreditsdoesnotrequirereversal.SeeMatthewP.Finlawv. 3/9 AndersonCountyJail,No.03C019212CR00448(Tenn.Crim.App.,atKnoxville,Aug. V50; 13,1993).Seealso,Statev.Henry,946S.W.2d833,834(Tenn.Crim.App.1997)(Held 6I2= thatwherecasereversedandremanded,trialcourtinbestpositiontocalculatepretrialcredits).Underthecircumstancesofthepresentcase,theappropriateavenuefortheappellantisthroughtheAdministrativeProceduresAct.SeeStatev.JamesAlphonso ;27C Vaughn,No.01C019308CR00258(Tenn.Crim.App.,atNashville,Feb.24,1994).     `  ITIS,THEREFORE,ORDEREDthatthestatesmotiontoaffirmthe F judgmentofthetrialcourtunderRule20,TennesseeCourtofCriminalAppealsRules,   isgranted,andthejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.Itappearingthatthe <  petitionerisindigent,costsoftheseproceedingsaretaxedtothestate.  /  t `     h    D  p _____________________________ %u   `     h    D  p JOHNH.PEAY,JUDGE 9  CONCUR: 5 _____________________________  JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE E _____________________________  THOMAST.WOODALL,JUDGE